Mainstream Ignorance and Stupidity is the only way I can begin to comprehend "infinity".

[@NewCalculus]

If you can find an error, then state the error - I show you that you are wrong. If you write garbage, the I will delete your comment and block you. Resist the urge to be your moronic, ignorant selves. I know that stupidity cannot be cured, but ignorance can! Try removing head from butt in order to get a less smelly perspective. You're welcome morons!!! Link to ChatGPT dialogue: chatgpt.com/share/676a8edf-d944-8007-b8b2-15b90c8ad317 Proving a bijection is possible between real numbers and N: Assuming a decimal tree, I can assign a unique integer to each node as follows: 0-9 in the first column. 0-99 in the second column. 0-999 in the third column. 0.3 would therefore be assign the value 3. 0.01 would be assigned the value 22 (10+10+1+1). 0.004 would be assigned the value 155 (10+100+40+1+1+1+1+1). Therefore, the unique label 3-22-155 can be written as a unique integer 322155. So, I can find 322155 by traversing the decimal tree. Conversely, I can also find 0.314 by searching for the label 3-22-155. Therefore, I have a bijection. Your objection might be that I can't do this for an infinite decimal expansion, but my retort is that neither can you! For however many digits you give me, I can return a number. Since you can't complete infinity, you can't say that I should be able to. Join here to get access to Members Only Channel: kzbin.info/door/lBbBVLs3M-d3dNgU4Vop_Ajoin

[@BreezeTalk]

John is an interesting character in these videos. I don’t have any notion of being part of the audience he calls morons because it’s simply interesting to watch and listen to his videos.

[@ProjectionProjects2.7182]

Interesting. It seems the problem that people are having is that infinity is being treated as if it was just any other number when its not really a number but more of a idea (An idea thats often pretty counter intuitive in math in general). The whole thing of pi/2*infinity seems to be pretty meaningless.

[@NewCalculus]

Most people are incorrigibly stupid. I am just throwing these pearls of knowledge out perchance some souls with uninfected brains can learn before they fall ill with the infinity virus of Cantor.

[@BreezeTalk]

Couldn’t you be happy with both your way and the current way? They both seem very provable? I’m not attached to any either, just asking why.

[@NewCalculus]

No. My way is correct. The mainstream way is not and it's provably flawed as I have shown many times.

[@paulmejer653]

Why r u so angry

[@NewCalculus]

Am not. You are misinterpreting fervour for anger.

[@paulmejer653]

@ calling everyone ignorant and a moron makes you seem like an angry person

[@infinitesimotel]

@@paulmejer653 Hes referring to academics and mathmaticians that are festering in their malindoctrination both through ignorance and volition.

[@alexmantzoros3500]

:') 1)The mean value theorem is used to prove the fundamental theorem of calculus over a small interval of a partition of the whole interval, and not the whole interval of integration. Nowhere in the proof of the fundamental theorem it is applied to the whole interval. Your point is void :) Seems like you have some big problems with limits

[@NewCalculus]

:') 1)The mean value theorem is used to prove the fundamental theorem of calculus over a small interval of a partition of the whole interval, JG: More precisely over an interval where f ' (x) is smooth. and not the whole interval of integration. JG: The limits are taken over the entire interval (-oo, oo). Nowhere in the proof of the fundamental theorem it is applied to the whole interval. JG: The mean value theorem (mvt) IS the fundamental theorem of calculus (ftc), you dimwit! The ftc is derived in one step from the mvt. Your point is void :) JG: Your understanding is void since you haven't made any coherent point. Seems like you have some big problems with limits JG: Seems like you're an argumentative idiot and this will be your last comment.