Make your novel better with AI | Tips for creative human-AI collaboration

[@HelloKolla]

Well, that first one escalated quite quickly 😄 And the 2nd one 💀

[@BookFurnace]

Yeah, this model is not holding back, haha:)

[@BookFurnace]

I only scratched the surface of what we can do and left a lot "as an exercise to the viewer." If you'd like to see more videos on the topic - please let me know!:) I've played around with the model quite a bit and have some fun examples and use cases to share.

[@BookFurnace]

@@HANNAHXLIEBE probably not with this model, but generally AI for drug discovery is a huge research topic right now.

[@undernetjack]

And this is how we destroyed book writing... Anyone who has spent time on Kindle - and other like sites- has run into books written by non english speakers that used bad translation software. These books are written as a service for someone who then floods the web trying to make money with this garbage. Now we have the same dirtbags, who do not even read a book, let alone write one, using AI software to write books and further flood the markets with trash. I am not alone surfing the web, and finding search results that seem promising until you click on the page or blog and spend several minutes reading the most superficial and general sentences strung together with a few keywords, all to get your clicks and eyeballs on Ads. Or half understandable 'word salad' also a scam website. Use of AI to write text or sing, make music, - all that 'the arts' is a slippery slope that will end badly. Even IF it gets to the point where AI can write masterpieces, It should not be allowed on moral grounds. I vote for punishments to include being staked to the ground on top of an ant pile....

[@undernetjack]

Or for the participating AI , slow degaussing or having their code altered by non programmers...

[@BookFurnace]

Well I think I might make a separate video on the impact of AI on art in general. On the one hand, I agree, that it's a slippery slope, and that the risks of flooding the market with autogenerated trash increase exponentially nowadays. On the other hand, if, in the future, AI actually becomes better than humans in creating art, and, generally, in being a decent type of being with laudable ambitions - maybe we, as humans, should accept our defeat. If, from the idealistic standpoint, AI is better in pursuing truth and beauty - what moral ground do we have to deny it this pursuit? If we, as humans, degrade so much as to have nothing of value to add to AI creations - I think we'd get what we deserve by passing into history.

[@BookFurnace]

In the extreme, I'd rather the world be populated with machines seeking beauty than humans wallowing in poor taste and mass produced slop.

[@BookFurnace]

That being said, the flood of low-effort publications is unfortunate. It's not AI's fault, but a consequence of a lack of basic work ethics on part of those who release such books. Traditional publishing is a way to guard against it and ensure some quality standards, but it's plagued with its own issues. I think some "independent author associations" should form, to issue some sort of guarantee that a given self-published book is fully edited and proofread. Maybe if this channel grows, I'll have the leverage to start this and other initiatives to better the situation.