‘Mako’ Multi-Mission Hypersonic Missile Unveiled | US Aims To Arm Jets, Subs With “Missile Of 13s”

Lockheed Martin and CoAspire unveiled their Mako Multi-Mission Hypersonic Missile during the Sea Air Space 2024. The emerging hypersonic munitions promise to revolutionise modern warfare and shape the outcome of future conflict. The munition, named after the Mako shark, will be used by the US Navy and can be matched with aircraft, including the F-35 Lightning II stealth fighter jet. According to Naval News, the munition will have multiple guidance methods, and it will also be able to hold several targets at risk. Watch the video to know more about the Mako Multi-Mission Hypersonic Missile.
#makohypersonicmissile #defencenews #armsnews
00:00 - INTRODUCTION
02:35 - FIRST HYPERSONIC WEAPON COMPATIBLE WITH 5TH-GEN AIRCRAFT
04:16 - THE MAKO MULTI-MISSION HYPERSONIC MISSILE
05:27 - HYPERSONIC MUNITIONS - BENEFITS & CHALLENGES
n18oc_world n18oc_crux
CRUX is your daily video news guide to the big events that are shaping our world. We track news, geopolitics, diplomacy and defence strategies and explain how they shape national policies. Crux makes sense of global developments, and analyses their impact on daily lives.
Follow CRUX on Telegram: bit.ly/3fnlLua
Follow CRUX on Instagram (@crux.india): bit.ly/3qSFx1K
Follow CRUX on Facebook: bit.ly/2Lte7iF
#GetCloserToTheNews with latest headlines on politics, sports and entertainment on news18.com bit.ly/2Y4QccL
Also watch:
Crux Decode: bit.ly/3MjzIoG
Crux+ : bit.ly/35mm97B
Crux Most Watched: bit.ly/3KhJ8iX

[@juanfermin8173]

the Bear (Russia) & the Dragon( China) are pushing the Eagle (America) to innovate , to not be left behind. GJ America. 👍

[@user-dx1dt2tn4g]

The world where one man think for the rest will never surpase the one where everyone can collectively built the futur...🧠

[@juanfermin8173]

@@user-dx1dt2tn4g agreed 👍🏻.

[@brandenjoseph604]

The US isn't trying to keep up. They are trying to stay ahead. Everyone is chasing the leader.

[@pleasemisguideme345]

United States had hypersonic weapons programs in 1970’s but abandoned them due to cost and the fact that no one else was capable of developing them nor was there a threat.

[@meshackomukaga8948]

What I believe is that the US is more advanced than what they display putting the black bird technology in consideration....

[@limuelquiachonaguilar1483]

F22 raptor💪💪💪🔥🔥🔥

[@mat_j]

Junk

[@johnvannisselroy6197]

@@mat_j Punk.

[@mat_j]

@@johnvannisselroy6197 lol

[@Vicari0usly]

@@mat_j…💀 sure thing my man

[@shawnwhitter5968]

The exact speed of the Mako is unknown but it's at least Mach 5 or more. It's definitely a game changing missile considering the platform versatility, affordability, as well as being a convention multi role missile. Imagine an F35 firing one and enemy Sam nets see a hypersonic shot from nowhere

[@user-wb1wk8uz8x]

I did not see it, how much does each one cost? Thanks.

[@shawnwhitter5968]

@@user-wb1wk8uz8x Supposedly $3 million

[@shawnwhitter5968]

@@user-wb1wk8uz8x Reportedly $3 million

[@hertzwave8001]

@@user-wb1wk8uz8x 62 cents, the fuel is more though

[@stinkbla5928]

@@user-wb1wk8uz8xunknown but probably a little under 10 million a unit

[@jember2001]

Beautiful

[@ajaybenjamin]

American Defence Manufacturers know how to Innovate and make amazing weapons & delivery platforms.

[@user-bp9cu6ry7q]

😂

[@stevevojtek8856]

😹😿👎😪🥵😡

[@richmike2033]

​@@user-bp9cu6ry7q, and C.h.iNa makes tofu weapons via stolen technology. The US of A will continue to innovate while C.hI.nA will continue to steal and/or copy tech. Check out their easily-broken-down EVS. 😂😂😂

[@ExceptionalLibra]

I see the bots jumped in to give their opinions with emojis!

[@glenatgoogle4393]

Might want to check your graphic at 4:36. The numbers don't stack right. (The missile weighs 13 pounds -- really?)

[@YellowGun114]

With this news, Putin's caviar became sour in his mouth. 🤣😂

[@user-bp9cu6ry7q]

Путин давно использует такие ракеты а Байден только мечтает😂

[@YellowGun114]

@@user-bp9cu6ry7q To what effect? Kinzhal is Patriot's little errand boy. 🤣😂

[@khanaliqasim1757]

Even iskander can destroy patriot let alone kinzhal

[@justarandomguy5993]

@khanaliqasim1757 Not a single battery has been confirmed through concrete evidence to be destroyed, a flash off in the distance in the missile of the night filmed on a iPhone camera is not sufficient evidence, Patriot has destroyed multiple kinhzals and islanders.

[@jeromemarasigan6739]

Atlast

Will they come with Wi-fi ?

[@JkDibine]

Since Russia wanna play the hypersonic game, US made time now to play. ☺️ 🇺🇸🇺🇦 ⬜🟦⬜

[@unknowncitizen282]

Still USA is not a competition for Russia lol they have all kinda hypersonic missile whereas USA has nothing only icbm with hypersonic capabilities whereas Russia has hypersonic glide vehicle (hgv) avangrad hypersonic cruise missile ( hcm) zircon

[@JkDibine]

​@@unknowncitizen282 US been making hypersonics since the late '40s, even the 70s.... But gave up on giving em to much thrust. 😁😄 There's a reason for it, but who the hell knows 🤷🏿‍♂️

[@unknowncitizen282]

@@JkDibine dude there is a limit to lie but blatantly lying saying USA tested hypersonic in 40s isn't something believable if USA was really testing hypersonic in 40s ans 70s why are they struggling to induct a hypersonic weapon in their arsenal oh the good 'o' Obama eh lol dude literally systematically lied and bluffed thr entire America making them further more dumber

[@YellowGun114]

@@unknowncitizen282 And how does that help Russia? it's retirees still earn 150$ a month and the weapons couldn't even help Russia take Kyiv in 3 days.

[@steveb890]

@@unknowncitizen282 Russia still think Kinzhal is a new hypersonic weapon , Zircon and Avanguard yet to be seen .... most likley propaganda as usual !

[@quitehat7819]

China and Russia fires hypersonic missiles from ballistic platforms. While US fires from its fighters. Big significant change. Yeah may not have the range as a big hypersonic but it can fire more than 1 missile from a fighter!

[@b21raider27]

Very nice. Speed vs maneuverability vs range, compromises. In atmosphere going high speed = much less maneuverable. Less maneuverable = much easier to shoot down. Path is predictable. Germany scrapped their super torpedo (300mph+) due to limited range and lack of maneuverability. Speed isn’t everything. Space combat, speed would be insanely important.

[@robertcuellar4132]

Hay is it reliable since only 29% of the f 35 is even mission capable

[@apuuvah]

Will fit inside F-35A only. Cost 3M. Warhead about the same as 155 mm shell. So, against (mobile) high value soft targets only. Mainly against enemy ground based air defence (radars) and missile launchers. Still good, if accurate and "impossible" to defend against.

[@ViceCoin]

An air-breathing missile, with no booster, needs to be launched at supersonic speed. F35 melts after 30 seconds at Mach. 1..

[@jamclancy9335]

Yeah. I think MAKO's value would be that becoz of its speed & maneuverability, it would be hard to intercept. So even only a few of these missiles launch from F-35's would be able to get thru even the most densed enemy integrated air defense & be able to take out the enemy air defense radars. With the enemy radars being eliminated, it would clear the way for non-stealthy fighters & bombers to get close to enemy high value targets & launch subsonic missiles and ordnance like JASSM, JSOW, SDB, JDAM, etc.

[@johnsilver9338]

It fits inside both F-35A and F-35C. Plus NG will also be submitting their own version for the SiAW competition so that too will also be interesting.

[@ViceCoin]

@@jamclancy9335 Another invincible weapon. LOL

[@ViceCoin]

Drones can can carry 55mmm dhells.

[@jamiemoore1056]

Can it go faster than mach 8?🎉

[@Someguy12796]

Most likely

[@wendelldig591]

AGM hypersonic mach9

[@justarandomguy5993]

No, that’s not the point. That’s speeds for AGM-183A

[@JDurand888]

God bless America

[@user-bp9cu6ry7q]

Боже хорони омерику

[@user-bp9cu6ry7q]

Бог не может хранить извращенцев🌈🐓почитай Библию☝️

[@stevevojtek8856]

Není nikdo na světě a vesmíru kdo.by ještě měl chuť pomoci agresorum a ničitelům demokracie a využívání státu k svému obohacení

[@chillypalmer3458]

This must the changer of all game changers..

[@Richvibe604]

I hope you are joking😜

[@user-bp9cu6ry7q]

Гипперпук от янки😂

[@justarandomguy5993]

@user-zp2gk4tg6v How is it a joke, a hypersonic missile that is relatively cheap and can fit inside a F-35 is a game changer, Lockheed said it is also ready to be deployed.

[@Richvibe604]

@@justarandomguy5993 if you don't know govt always write it in paper but in reality it never exist😔

[@mastermariner490]

@@Richvibe604Lol its actually the opposite,live with it

[@piotrkijak1774]

Actually it's not said mach 5 it's speed is unknown some predicted that because its so light it can go even mach 12+

[@cristianmorar5558]

Marketing vs reality

[@thomasschweiker7259]

Does it work

[@raffaeledelvecchio5204]

How many years after?

[@robertscott961]

After what ??No other country has an true air launched hypersonic missile...

[@el7105]

IS ANYONE GOING TO TELL HIM? USA HAD THIS TECHNOGLOGY BACK IN THE 1950/60 THEY JUST SCRAPPED IT BECAUSE IT WAS TOO EXPENSIVE AT THE TIME. USA HAS HAD THIS TECH FOR DECADES MY FRIEND

[@nathanielalaburgDelhi]

It’s not an arching fly path and can change course and go any direction it wants unlike all the other “hyper Sonic’s “

[@jaylenflanagan1295]

We had this for decades goofball

[@mohameddiaby835]

The US has had the technology for a while now. It had been at least 60 years. But it was expensive then to commission. So it was scrapped and shelved.

[@user-tk2jy8xr8b]

Air-breathing solid fuel? Eh?

[@drgonzo305]

I’m pretty sure it weighs more than 13 pounds

[@andrycam6708]

And, finally, US TAKES THE LEAD! Mako is certainly an ordinary "glide vehicle missile", but it is extraordinarily small in size despite having an acceptable range (especially if installed on F35s) and, therefore, has better fuel than those of Russia and China (enormous). Furthermore, the US is in the lead when it comes to the real evolution: air-breathing cruise missiles. Lockeed and Ratheon's years of studies are beginning to bear fruit.

[@meshackomukaga8948]

Not new the US made it long time ago....if you consider the black bird technology.

[@Bootsystem66]

Business is on the up for Mr L H Martin at the same rate as deaths..

[@NesconProductions]

Interesting to hear the Lockheed project manager say the weapon system is ready now 🤨. Unclear from this video if this missile has every been tested yet in powered flight 🤔 (no test flight video was supplied here & making a successful hypersonic missile design has proven very difficult in the past)? Curious if a bit of reverse engineering has been utilized from captured / fallen hypersonic munitions used by Russia against Ukraine? Such munitions have proved highly effective & very difficult to shot down.

[@jmbaka007]

It has. They said it is ready for use

[@shawnsweet5557]

13 pounds...??? With a 130 pound warhead.....

[@user-wb1wk8uz8x]

I can't rap my head around it. 13LBS? I must be missing something.

[@shawnsweet5557]

@@user-wb1wk8uz8x I know lol, don't they have editors that screen these before they put them on KZbin?

[@michaelcalibri3620]

At the rate of advance of technology they'll be 20 nuclear armed nations in less than 20 more years.

[@JkDibine]

WW3 won't wait 20 more yrs

[@manofcultura]

Nuclear weapons aren’t that easy to make. The problem isn’t the technology but the time and money to operate enrichment facilities. Think of it as launching a rocket. We’ve been doing that since the 50s, but it really hasn’t gotten much cheaper. Even reusable rockets like SpaceX have is still expensive

[@michaelcalibri3620]

@@manofcultura I think yes in many respects but have you heard of SILEX laser refinement which was 30+ years ago. Enrichment isn't stuck in the centrifuge only reality you're led to believe. In a world where AI over-promises it's still unwise to pretend it will take 50 years and the Manhattan Project to create things. You bypass a great many alternatives that have become available. The technology for Havana Syndrome has existed for 40+ years yet you only start seeing it alleged now. Why? Don't mistake a lack of proliferation for difficulty. The biggest prohibition is always withholding or incomplete knowledge which any number of powers today can provide. Bangladesh is getting a reactor via rubbish. A backwater third world nation. Besides if other nations get the mechanics right Russia/China/North Korea could always open backdoor trading of pre-refined product. The number one move the so called axis could take is dilution of accountability by massive proliferation. If North Korea masters Davy Crockett nuke level portability they can enable this.

[@michaelcalibri3620]

@@manofcultura Very odd. I absolutely responded to this a few hours ago and the entire response is gone. This is the second time in less than two weeks. I see you Google/KZbin. Let those who deliberately install governors on cars and other deliberate hindrances understand that progress has no loyalty, no nation lasts 4 billion years and that critical thinking undermines maintenance of central dependency structures. Sorry respondent for catching you up in this but Mr. KZbin seems not to have liked my response to you mentioning SILEX enrichment.

[@michaelcalibri3620]

@@manofcultura I tried to respond to this twice and it was removed via Google's "Here are a few reasons why your comment might not show: Automatic removal: Our automatic detection systems constantly scan comments to find whether they violate our Community Guidelines. If our system detects that your comment violates our Community Guidelines, then the comment is removed." I see you KZbin, this is worse censorship than Yahoo's. At least Yahoo says your comment is rejected, here you absorb the answer into some black hole log and make it look as if the response was never written. Big Sister at work.

[@armchairgeneral7557]

Is it true the mako fits inside the f-22? Because I don’t think that is factually correct. The f-22 can’t carry 2000 lb bombs like the f-35 and only has space for 1000 lb bombs. I don’t see the f-22 ever carrying mako if mako makes it to production. The f-22 should remain dedicated to air superiority and the f-35 be responsible for dropping bombs and kicking down the door. We only have 185 or so f-22 and it will be replaced in 10 years with NGAD. Definitely not worth cost or effort.

[@omvinodjadhav1484]

Usa is entirely focusing on hypersonic missiles sssiles because it knows about their importance

[@niweshlekhak9646]

It's not entirely focusing on hypersonic, they are also working on two 6th generation fighters, next generation missiles AIM-260 JATM and Peregrine missiles, next gen SSBN, new ICBM, missile systems.

[@yaqob3275]

Because they still don't have hypersonic missiles 😂 30 years behind china, Russia and iran

[@omvinodjadhav1484]

@@yaqob3275 who said you thirty years behind, you are saying about that russian hypersonic missiles which had been shot down by Ukranians and that chinese missile who have filled with water and that Iranian missile which don't have any capability to destroy anything. Patriot missile defense has the capability to shoot down hypersonic missiles. Many us programs are in development only they are yet to deploy.

[@jaylenflanagan1295]

@@yaqob3275none of them have effective hypersonic missiles clown 🤡

[@yaqob3275]

@@omvinodjadhav1484 That's called a claim and propaganda...all BS 😂 Remember when NATO started Ukraine war, they were saying Ukraine was winning and Russia's military capability was depleted 😂 few weeks ago it's the opposite 😂 Btw shooting hypersonic missiles down doesn't mean you have hypersonic missiles. That's some dumb propaganda 😂

[@user-bp9cu6ry7q]

Все что есть у америки это огромный госдолг😂🎉

[@goodie7082]

🤡🤡🤡🤡

[@chernyyvolk423]

😂😂😂

[@johnvannisselroy6197]

What a shame these are unlikely to be supplied to Ukraine. russia could do with several of these up its jacksy.

[@stevevojtek8856]

Ha ha ha😂😢

[@Wafak896]

I think rassia now is panic😅😅😅

[@Biden_has_dementia]

Copium 😂

[@mat_j]

another gemachanger weapon lol...cope

[@raynierjob8488]

The tankies and the vatniks lost their ability to say "we got hypersonics" lolz

[@user-bp9cu6ry7q]

Нам насрать на этот хлам от янки😂

[@Biden_has_dementia]

@@raynierjob8488 the yankees are desperate to make people believe that they have a hypersonic weapon even though they have failed multiple times in testing their previous hypersonic missile lol !

[@krystalmae5557]

Wow finally they have a hypersonic missile, btw only mach 5? Damn thats slow compared to chinas and Russia's

[@unknowncitizen282]

Nope they don't Lockheed just unveiled plans for hypersonic missile for f-35 it is still on papers only

[@marz6526]

But they can fit it in fighter jets

[@hate-chan4369]

Russia doesn’t have a hypersonic missile. Why do Russians keep insisting they do? China even laughed at Russia saying they have hypersonic missiles lol

[@el7105]

@@unknowncitizen282 ARRW HAS BEEN SUCCESFULLY TESTED MY FRIEND. TRY AGAIN

[@unknowncitizen282]

@@el7105 arrw failed my friend last time they fired was a month back from South China Sea to provocate china but USA hasn't disclosed the result of launch the previous launches were disclosed as failure pls try again may be you might get successful

[@leesenger3094]

Slavic bots just don't get it

[@peterlangan1181]

No! Rational people don’t accept lies from the U.S. MIC! Only the gullible US fan boys believe it!

[@raphael3620]

US and hypersonic missile is an oxymoron 😂

[@parlaxbonife2347]

Goodbye Iran! 😂

[@ViceCoin]

Its only a mockup. No engine, warhead, or sensors.

[@niweshlekhak9646]

they said it's ready for production.

[@bygcbg]

Mach 5? 😅😂🤣

[@el7105]

You do know russia only has its hypersonic missile mounted on an ICBM right? so does china. They can only use thiers in an event of a nuclear exchange while the Americans just perfected a samller missle that can be used everyday to destroy those icbms.

[@raphael3620]

Didn’t know hypersonic missile is this small… I smell another lie from the US.. i can bet my last cash that US doesn’t have hypersonic missile

[@JkDibine]

first hypersonic missile us ever made "The first manufactured object to achieve hypersonic flight was the two-stage Bumper rocket, consisting of a WAC Corporal second stage set on top of a V-2 first stage. In February 1949, at White Sands, the rocket reached a speed of 8,290 km/h (5,150 mph), or about Mach 6.7."

[@unknowncitizen282]

Yes they don't have they tested many times from b-52 but failed all the times

[@el7105]

@@unknowncitizen282 LIES, ARRW IS ABOUT TO GO INTO SERVICE WITH THE USA AIRFORCE. TRY AGIAIN

[@nathanielalaburgDelhi]

The people who invented the atomic bomb, fastest and highest flying aircraft to date ,computational communication and the damn internet all of which you are using to even look at this video can’t make a hypersonic? Single digit IQ anyone?? lol

[@niweshlekhak9646]

@@unknowncitizen282 this is not the same as the one tested on B-52, B-52 tested ARRW missile and this MAKO missile.

[@mat_j]

looks fake

[@user-dx1dt2tn4g]

No that Russia we don't bullshit!! Faillures is always a way to learnt !😛🇺🇸🏋️‍♂️🧠❤

[@mat_j]

@@user-dx1dt2tn4g like the invincible Abrams lmfao...

[@jamclancy9335]

Yeah. F-22 & F-35 look fake as well.

[@user-dx1dt2tn4g]

@@mat_j lmfao Russia are the one calling things invincible cause Russia can't failed like the Titanic....🧠🤡🙃

[@wendelldig591]

Lol

[@peterlangan1181]

The emerging hypersonic missiles…..you mean like the ones Russia has production items of? The U.S. keeps producing ….soon to be weapons…..tell us when it’s operational guys.

[@noahbutler9180]

Russia isn’t in production of anything they took a ground launched ballistic missile and put it on a fighter. When looking at hypersonic missiles being developed by serious militaries you are talking about glide vehicles and cruise missiles that’s it. Russia is a joke.

[@mastermariner490]

Its ready for production,live with it Igor

[@kinglight9863]

Here we go again you saying what you got but you told the Senate subcommittee you have hypersonic missiles did you said the eight fleet to Taiwan without any hypersonic missile let’s stop the lies

[@victoravila7581]

To late to expensive... even Iran got better Hyper sonics than this crap! Ask Israel what happened in Nevatim Air Base.

[@mastermariner490]

Iran lol hows the Iranian weapons doing on Ukraine,clown

[@pedrosoc7609]

mach 5 is barely above normal supersonic missile witch goes to 4.5-4.9 mach roflmao what a piece of crap to put it in context even iranian crappy hypersonic missile goes 6-6.5mach chinese that goes 8+mach and russian that goes 10mach+ russians can shoot these crappy new american missile even with s-300 rockets that goes 5.5-6machs

[@Wvavy]

Thinking this is the only thing America has is insane. You realize you only find out when they want you to, right? Lol this entire time the US has been lesding in hypersonic technology but your weird hate for America clouds your judgment.

[@raphael3620]

@@Wvavy how many times has US hypersonic missile failed?😂

[@bygcbg]

🤣🤣🤣

[@Wvavy]

@raphael3620 less times than Iranian, Russian and Chinese, that's for sure. You have to realize the US doesn't jjst show everything off to the world lol.

[@marz6526]

But US can fit it on jets means it's an air to air/surface missile. And I think Russian hypersonic are launched from ground only ?? Am I right ?

[@pedrosoc7609]

slow crappy american missile

[@JkDibine]

😆

[@sumerbc7409]

ok what r ur GPS coordinates again? ok thanks got it. fire!

[@el7105]

mojado...

[@jaylenflanagan1295]

Stand in front of it🤡

[@pedrosoc7609]

@@jaylenflanagan1295 u gonna get yours