MAKS in KSP

[@VitlXGaming]

Государственное Предприятие "Антонов" пренадлежит Украине, А это значит что данный самолёт также. Но почему-то вы сказали что в СОВЕТСКОЙ РОССИИ Был этот самолёт, а также он был уничтожен той же Россией. State Enterprise "Antonov" belongs to Ukraine, which means that this aircraft also. But for some reason, you said that in SOVIET RUSSIA there was this plane, and it was also destroyed by the same Russia.

[@FunBotan]

I agree. Unfortunately, the best I can do to fix this is to add the correction to the description and pin the comment, since KZbin has disabled all other ways of issuing corrections post-upload.

[@fsbis]

Разрабатывали этот самолёт инженеры со всего союза, самолёт принадлежал народу одной страны. Но жадные люди разгромили страну, а ее людей и разработки присвоили себе. Мне очень грустно, что из за буржуазии теряются прорывные разработки советского государства...

[@VitlXGaming]

@@fsbis ну и да одновременно но и нет 乁⁠(⁠ ⁠•⁠_⁠•⁠ ⁠)⁠ㄏ

[@_l7pocto_4udo_66]

А то что собирали запачасти для самолетов что Ан-22, что 124 что 225 по всему союзу (в основном авиазавод в Ташкенте) не хочешь вспомнить?) Что весь союз работал над созданием этих самолетов, от разработки сплавов до создания и поставки компонентов на авиазавод Антонова для финальной сборки. Лишь бы хрюкнуть оскорбление, я тебе удивляюсь.

[@homescience8946]

Ну ты и тварь, самолет делался инженерами всего СССР а не "независимой" "украины". И уничтожена была его самоцель именно в Украине

[@zerstorer5006]

М - многофункциональная А - аэро К - космическая С - система M - multipurpose A - aero K - space (kosmicheskaya) S - system

[@thenooscoper64]

tnx comrade :)

[@paper6405]

Benito I thought you wee Italian not Russian

[@kekkodance]

@@paper6405 ye mussolini is the shit that allied with hitler

[@humppi.2304]

@@kekkodance Bruh you never know when he change sides

[@Buran1494]

Orales un tipo escribiendo en ruso e inglés

[@lward98]

The space shuttle attached to the An-225 looks like a huge RPG round with a shuttle strapped on the rear. Very kerbal and Russian at the same time.

[@ЕгориАлинаГрибенюк]

Edward Lo СССР RULEZ лол, он не знает что я сказалл....

[@takaluki1749]

Егор и Алина Грибенюк , я, кстати, тоже.

[@indicus9075]

My therapist: soviet kerbals dont exist they cant hurt u Soviet kerbals:

[@VitlXGaming]

Soviet kerbals: repeat that!!! And you'll....

[@tyorca5854]

I love how in the infomertial it says "Low on budget?" When the aircraft/spaceplane looks ridiculously expensive.

[@FunBotan]

Well, on paper, this should have become the cheapest space launch system available (per-launch, obviously).

[@SRmcjax]

Socialist?

[@jesusramirezromo2037]

Compares to the Shuttle and Buran?, It woulf of bean cheap af

[@LKokos]

Lol tried to time warp a video.... im smart

[@lewismassie]

I've tried to drag the camera angle round before XD

[@yoavmor9002]

_Squad should see this_

[@yoriichitsugikuni2100]

Fuck you all fuck

[@t65bx25]

You can now!

[@gemizu4874]

Yeah annoying when watching KSP videos right after playing, I Always attempt to rotate the camera or click the screen XDDD

[@Gremlinke96]

Multi Purpose Kommunistic System

[@thelennipede9382]

Nomadeu multi person kerbal sacrificematic 69000

[@jim4671]

Nomadeu I like it.

[@Near_Void]

In Russian communist is коммунист [kommunist]

[@iceboygamer944]

Nomadeu หำมันแย่ไง

[@iceboygamer944]

Joseph Stalin 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🇹🇭🛫🛫🛫

[@АлексейФилин-р8ч]

В Жуковском на открытой площадке Пантелеимоновского Прихода (Учебно-просветительский аэро-космический центр им. И.П.Волка) стоит учебно-тренеровочный самолет ""Молния-1 " созданный для подготовки экипажей МАКС в НПО "Молния"

[@MephLeo]

Would be the ideal way to service the ISS and ferry crew or supplies with a lower cost. The only non reusable part is the tank, and it could even be made recoverable. A pity how the project didn't quite _took off_.

[@FunBotan]

Yep, that's the point. Also it would make space factories profitable, which means by now we could have 60 GHz GaAs-based processors and who knows what else.

[@MephLeo]

FunBotan Russia should revive the old Soviet project and make it fully automated like the Buran (even the carrier plane, who knows)

[@davidamaral3397]

i don't know, i wouldn't use the word ideal... compare it with modern projects: dragon v2 + falcon 9 (spacex) - precision landing (retro propulsion) is better than runway landing - or even the dream chaser (sierra nevada corporation) - which is a spaceplane too. seems pretty hard to make the tank reusable, so not an entirely reusable concept. doesn't seem like the project is worth reviving, it's old technology and there's already good projects like the ones i mentioned under development and test flights. cool concept though, it's smart to launch payloads from higher altitudes as less mass is required to launch the payload, which in turn can be bigger.

[@FunBotan]

+David Amaral SpaceX setup is even less reuseable due to the second stage, and dream chaser is nothing more than an upper stage for a conventional rocket (copied from old soviet shuttle projects btw).

[@MephLeo]

David Amaral Ok. _IDEAL_ would be a space elevator. Which isn't feasible, at least not yet. Given the current tech level and the specs a ship needs to attain in order to effectively run routine missions to service the ISS, this project is worthy of attention, still. The tank can be recovered with some minimal effort and the whole thing is the closest one can get, in concept, to a SSTO like Skylon, which is much more worth of attention as a LEO ferry than SpaceX and Dream Chaser, but it depends on the British to make that sexy ass engine to work. While they develop it, I would give this project a careful look. Old technology? Well, the 60's Soviet engines are the best ones already developed, are still in use and even power some American rockets. Being old doesn't necessarily mean being useless. If I had the decision-making power, I would revisit this, if only as research material. But I bet, if revisited, it would end up being much more than that.

[@weatheranddarkness]

any landing you walk away from is a good landing 6:15

[@sfsaviation]

Ethan Barr you forgot getting eaten by the kraken

[@PaulRakoczi]

I love music from Stellaris

[@cristalPL]

Me too mah Polish friend :D

[@lukefreeman828]

Just wish that damned 1.3 update would release already!

[@dosmastrify]

Luke Freeman 1.2 just came out dude

[@lukefreeman828]

1.3 is a reference to 1.3 of Stellaris (that's why I said it under a Stellaris comment) not a reference to KSP.

[@Oliepolie]

dosmastrify of the closet

[@stephenstephanov245]

Watched the entire thing, have never played this game. This is some really good content. Music and gameplay is really inspiring. Thanks for making this :D

[@lewismassie]

Wow, this is absolutely stunning. You might have just earned a sub

[@lewismassie]

***** yes, why?

[@lewismassie]

I did at first, but after a while I ended up focussing on other stations that I built from scratch. You?

[@lewismassie]

Makes sense. I just start a new station which I build up until I run out of ideas and then build another. I usually end up with several strewn about the system

[@lifeisonlyoptional2215]

Thekker3b I know I'm insanely late, but you could have a few drilling modules that take ore to the station for refining, and some deployable/recoverable sats. to scan for ore. Just an idea. I've never even been able to land OR crash anything on the moon, even less get large payloads into orbit, so the idea is useless to me. I have (somehow) gotten a small satellite with very small amounts of fuel and a small engine from Kerbin orbit to a ginormous orbit around the sun, using a small rocket to get it into an unstable orbit. At the time didn't know how to use maneuvers, so just did a burn out into space before burning up in the atmosphere and ended up orbiting the sun.

[@Radzaification]

Original purpose of the plane was for the transport of the similar Buran program on it's back, hence the split tail. The An-225 is also the heaviest and longest plane ever made, with the longest going to the Spruce Goose from many years ago.

[@doesitmatter1667]

Radzaification not with the longest wingspan or height, though

[@FireStillPlays]

love the music. From stellaris, yes?

[@Misterixmax]

Stellaris)

[@Marqan]

makes me want to play it agian

[@gamertimefriend1286]

Marqan I'm waiting for the new dlc for super space structures. Utopia

[@Gordon_Workshop]

awesome

[@paprika7x153]

Makc Gordon привет макс. я твой подписчик.

[@Gordon_Workshop]

привет

[@АрахисовоеМасло-я3я]

Привет

[@gamermantap2422]

Gordon's workshop awesome

[@ruron3494]

"Space was invented by the Russians, you know." --Chekov

[@rossmoney]

nice video! you really put in the time on this one. appreciated the space-appropriate music as well :)

[@XiaosChannel]

so the k stands for space?

[@FunBotan]

yep

[@waffleonquaffle]

Kosmos

[@Gentleman...Driver]

For Kerbal...

[@gavib4246]

Xiao'sChannel the k stands for k

[@herlax2]

MAKS is Russian name, so he added one more letter to make it as name.

[@oscarsalomonsson1093]

Nice antonov

[@delayed_control]

You would get better results if you disabled pitch in flaps... you've flown the Mriya effectively with spoilers out

[@FunBotan]

Stock aerodynamics works in mysterious ways. Somehow the spoilers helped me with control authority instead of messing it up. Probably because of high AoA.

[@Near_Void]

They. Are Ailerons m4ti140. Not Flaps

[@MrRoman238]

Thank you very much for this video and for historical information about that stopped project. Greetings from Russia.

[@garyteano3026]

The music is as atmospheric as that plane...

[@kaiasorensen5178]

Beautiful vessels :) Very impressive. Great music. Best part was "nobody saw that" xD

[@ValentineC137]

i feel really sad inside after that ending

[@EvilNeonETC]

Bob kerman towards the end looks like he's having quite a bit of fun 😂

[@Karen-lh6xy]

That stellaris music makes this even better

[@peaceene789]

Душевно ^_^

[@АлексейКармазин-с2ж]

Точно.

[@josichstaler4909]

CYKA

*This is really cool. An airplane that sends a rocket straight into space to stay in orbit or reach the chosen destination.*

[@guidosarducci166]

Waidaminnut... Wasn't the AN-225 developed to carry the Buran?

[@FunBotan]

Yep, but not only for that. After all its maximum load was like 3 Burans.

[@guidosarducci166]

True. It is one hell of a heavy lift transporter!

[@benkerby4827]

It was developed to transport the Buran and the Energia boosters. MAKS was only proposed after the AN-225 had already been built.

[@orinpolansky386]

Not really, it was also built to carry Spiral system. It was quite similar to what has been shown in this video. Maximum load capability was more than it needs to carry Buran but enough to not fall apart after launch of booster of Spiral system. This what it supposed to look like. www.buran.ru/images/gif/spiral1.gif Unfortunately USSR has fall apart and only space fighter and AN-225 has been built. Booster module has never seen this world.

[@ryanfrogz]

Antonov a-225 anyone?

[@OfficialKittenNation]

Rïan Yes, it is an AN-225

[@TylerSmith-hd8tb]

Also known as Big Boris

[@mineclone9488]

thicc plane

[@redrickschuchart6425]

This is "Мрiя" (мрия ; mriya) This jet transporting "Buran" Sorry for my english

[@atomskate4882]

Antanov a-225 mriya *

[@ArtMonator]

Awesome! Now you can see the original rear part of the orbital plane "Molnia" in museum of the Cosmonautics and Aviation Center in Moscow. I work there :)

[@АлексейФилин-р8ч]

Гениально-красивый проект генерала звездных войск "Гнева Евгеньевича" Лозино-Лозинского!Могу смотреть и коментировать для учеников/слушателей весь процесс полета МАКСа пока не охрипну!

[@ericbluschke8773]

stellaris music!!

[@davidholmen]

Cool video! I can see you put a lot of effort into this :)

[@szubareg7485]

Nice, you transported This blyatplane by the Blyantonov Ab-225, nice, *BLYATIFUL*

[@roslozynskyy]

Plane is An-225 "Mriya" (ukr. Ан-225 "Мрія"), and is actually Ukrainian (Antonov factory in Kyiv, Ukraine), not Russian. It is still operating. Now there is a plan to produce modernized An-225 in cooperation with China.

[@VladHarsh]

Да хрен там. Разрабатывали и создавали его всем Союзом, а в одиночестве Украина не смогла собрать ни одного даже из тех частей, что у неё были в наличии... да и КБ больше нет, в общем-то.

[@rparker069]

I love the Multipurpose Aerospace Ka-System

[@nikenn8484]

K means Космос - Space

[@absolutelynoone2349]

1:35 Russian pilots: *WE PAID FOR THE WHOLE RUNWAY, WE WILL USE THE WHOLE RUNWAY*

[@michaelladd4049]

Excellent choice in music, Stellaris rules!

[@flare242]

Bob HATED this flight. With a passion! :-D

[@reyszha17]

actually in the late 2000 around 2008-2010, Roscosmos and Lapan made early agreement to turn Biak, in Indonesia to be Space Launch Site with Antonov as the main carrier, i saw the brochures, but i never heard later news about that agreement

[@Northstar1989]

I wonder how this would've compared on a cost-basis to reusable Falcon 9's? The Falcon 9 Full Thrust has a published payload of 22.8 tons and about the same flight cost ($100 mil) for military contracts (only around $60 mil for civilian payloads), as well as being designed for about the same number of re-uses (a bit over 100 when fully operational), so I'm guessing it would be a bit cheaper- but it throws away its upper stage at the moment (whereas the MAKS only threw away a drop tank) so I'm guessing not that much less...

[@tamburlaineman]

Great reentry. Very well controlled.

[@brawo_1671]

Kerbal space program, music from Stellaris and Soviet An-225. This is the best crossover

[@charlieallensworth8380]

Origional Purpose was to do a SSTO ship that would replace the space shuttle. We now use rockets

[@vriskaserket8058]

You mean to say "we went back to using rockets" Shuttle was cool and all but financially expensive in the long run. better to stick with big focused boom rods.

[@ReynardFuchsmann]

Vriska Serket *at least until we think of something better

[@vriskaserket8058]

Xortsa yup

[@themosh54]

Love the Twin Peaks music at the beginning

[@AhriMedia]

Amazing Job with everything

[@thatoneguymccool1469]

The fuel tank may be expensive to replace everything is recoverable except that expensive to build for the first time tho could hold high altitude experiments inside the transport plane tho that would earn you a lot and would pay of the lost fuel tank unless you could somehow get a helicopter to recover that

[@johnallardyce4164]

Another Soviet project that never saw the light of day :(

[@Near_Void]

D:

[@nikolaskostenko9526]

Ну, как бы спираль была построена, но в космосе не была.

[@xXGamingFactorXx]

Who else is excited for EM 1 and 2 and the Space X moon mission coming up in 2018?

[@Brendan9300]

The starting a video is gold

[@lesliechow4719]

Antonov was only used to transport the shuttle from the factory to the launch site.

[@hatman4818]

You're thinking of the Buran space shuttle. The Maks shuttle was SPECIFICALLY designed to launch from the back of the AN 225 at high altitude, allowing the shuttle to get to space without the use of separable boosters.

[@Purparmalm]

6:22 What are you talking about "nobody saw that" ?

[@feynthefallen]

nicely done. And _I_ remember the original purpose of this plane, mate. The russians may have a lot of faults, but boy, can they do engineering! I love the simplicity of russian engineering.

[@weatheranddarkness]

I'm impressed at how little fuel you can use to orbit with a payload. Smart little kit that one. I thought it was canned because while it looked nice on paper it wouldn't actually achieve orbital velocity.

[@FunBotan]

Nope, the reasons were way less fancy. I also wonder how it would work IRL since my craft is barely enough for Kerbin, but apparently there are serious papers confirming its capability.

[@weatheranddarkness]

I guess in terms of apparent payload fraction it makes sense. But the 225 wasn't really modified for altitude all that much, more to carry the mass and be stable so even then it's surprising because it wouldn't stage at really stratospheric levels. I'm going to have to read up more on this.

[@djdm2603]

Is that an Antov 225? Looks alot like it. great video!

[@doesitmatter1667]

Stormforce VII Antonov*, and Hell. Yes.

[@icrafterchips]

In soviet Russia, the solution has you.

[@piranha031091]

That landing was brutal! GG for nailing it!

[@sephirotic87]

That was actually an awful landing.

[@Near_Void]

Better than blowing up

[@kabanostv262]

Multipurpose aerospace KERBAL system rhats right

[@redvor2486]

Space. In russian космическая (kosmicheskaya)

[@КомандаОтбитые]

Спасибо за Мрию и Буран старина) Thx for "Mria" and "Buran" old bo)

[@GameplayReviewUK]

Really cool video man, Good Job :D

[@QuartzFox]

the K represents the "adding K to every word" splash in ksp

[@FunBotan]

Herobrine2515 Gaming brilliant

[@QuartzFox]

ayyy!

[@bjovers1]

really cool video and very informative!! 😊

[@ramirowendler]

stellaris soundtrack!

[@wanlaphatarn7916]

11:33 Its PROBABLY to not waste alot of fuel whilst lifting off.

[@noahcheckman8542]

I remember the original purpose of the plane: Military Transport.

[@IllusionGDP]

i.... PLAY DAT GAME 🙋🙌😏

[@redgamer821]

Very nice replica, but you can center the wheels a little higher since the wheels on a real Antonov 225 are really close to the fuselage.

[@FunBotan]

Yeah then i'll probably lose half the engines on landing

[@drewitts2804]

I like how u chose to use the T H I C C O N O V

[@anarchismconnoisseur2892]

Are you using music from Stellaris?

[@FunBotan]

Yep. I've linked everything in the description.

[@pianoshark9247]

0:02 Hey Sally! They know de wae! Man.

[@pulseplaza6887]

you are an actual legend

[@FunBotan]

wat.

[@S3V3N_]

Wow this Video was very nice. Thank you for this cool Entertainment👍

[@crazyanarchist5809]

The o.g video of this is Jeb's Junkyard on the front

[@Rayan-bj8wn]

"low on budget"

[@Greater98er]

5:40 did you just do a split s with an an-225?

[@gazehound]

How does no one know the purpose of this? It seems pretty clear

[@gavinj2908]

good job ，you are the future of human ，but landing looks so dangerously 。

[@MrKERTAK]

Многоцелева́я авиацио́нно-косми́ческая систе́ма (verbatim: Multipurpose avia kosmos system) - Multipurpose aerospace system

[@Aaquashl]

I never knew that it was a real project!

[@ЕгориАлинаГрибенюк]

Lapis Gaming , we have a CRYSTAL channel in russia

[@ПумБаюн]

www.buran.ru/htm/molniya.htm

[@OvercookedSteak]

You have a wild/crazy/epic/awesome imagination!!!!! Nice job!!!!

[@Jorropo]

You have a lot of mods and wich mods you used for "Spliting time line" or rec action and redo it but on author vessel like 5:25 please

[@FunBotan]

Flight manager for reuseable stages

[@Jorropo]

ok thx

[@rubemjr9623]

5:40 Wasn't it just easier to put ailerons on the damn thing?

[@FunBotan]

It has ailerons lol Problem is that the vertical angle of wings make rolling hard as fuck, at least in KSP.

[@rubemjr9623]

Now it makes sense

[@WHITELAZER-ip5df]

FunBotan I see EVERYTHING

[@WHITELAZER-ip5df]

you just won a sub

[@ZVLIAN]

And the Plane? Does it crash?

[@MaartenOosterbaan]

The original original purpose of that plane was the Buran, not this system....

[@FunBotan]

Although its max payload capacity is equivalent to 3 Burans, so it was designed with future applications in mind

[@WinVisten]

MAKS is so cute. I love it.

[@HIvanchuk]

This is MRIA or hope and shuttle BURAN

[@Skwisgar2322]

could have saved a bit of fuel if you had inverted and jettisoned the external tank behind you.

[@Skwisgar2322]

lol, also, only Jeb could get away with that return flightpath.

[@івантеслер]

but this is mriya the most biggest plane in the world

[@івантеслер]

and also its ukrainien

[@henrikt.183]

love that stellaris musik

[@numbers_rus1951]

Those guus who have name max: Oh woah this craft named like my name.

[@dallzerz]

You must have more mods than just that one surely

[@lennyman3629]

ok well antonov SOO DO U REALLY BUILD HEAVY WEIGHTS?

[@interzoneboy]

Неужели АН 225, мог так вертикально развернуться в реальности?

[@FunBotan]

Нет, но в реальности самолет с отрицательным поперечным V может поворачивать по крену.

[@interzoneboy]

Не знал про отрицательный. А большие самолёты так не могут из-за своих размеров, я прав?

[@FunBotan]

interzoneboy Их просто порвет перегрузкой

[@Near_Void]

славных друзей

[@onemutant]

ага и в ангаре, лечь на другой бочек. :)

[@alfromwork]

Thank God this project didn't work out, because who knows what kind of shenanigans the Soviets would use this for.

[@Northstar1989]

I wonder how this would've compared on a cost-basis to reusable Falcon 9's? The Falcon 9 Full Thrust has a published payload of 22.8 tons (compared to 9.8 tons for the MAKS in its unmanned configuration) and about the same flight cost (about $100 mil vs estimated $113 mil) for military contracts (only around $60 mil for F9 civilian payloads), as well as being designed for about the same number of re-uses (a bit over 100 when fully operational), so I'm guessing it would be cheaper- but F9 throws away its upper stage at the moment (whereas the MAKS only threw away a drop tank) so I'm guessing not that much lower a price...

[@raulrodriguezmendez655]

stellaris music

[@applepie55555]

Woah dude is this the same music used as in stellaris?