RIP Marcel. Thanks for another cracking episode with Mark!
@oleksijm7 ай бұрын
The problem with the French fleet is European Union regulations, which tacitly aim at getting rid of nuclear energy in the EU altogether.
@FixItStupid7 ай бұрын
No Matter What It's The Biggest Cancer Lotto Nuclear Is ALL LIES If You Look @ 41 CPM
@lv31847 ай бұрын
And what are those regulations?
@FernandoWINSANTO7 ай бұрын
Decontamination, decommissioning of old reactors is not " low cost " by any means.
@factnotfiction59157 ай бұрын
@@FernandoWINSANTO however, the cost - high or low - is not the major issue; the major issue is the return on investment, the value of the plant. In the US, the cost of decommissioning is factored into the wholesale price, and as nuclear has one of the lowest prices ... we can see that the 'high cost' is not %-wise all that significant.
@asabriggs64266 ай бұрын
@@FernandoWINSANTO A lot of decommissioning can be *made* more expensive by dredging up fears of radioactivity. Search for "T. Rockwell. What's wrong with being cautious?" and read up on the expense caused by a dribble. Leave the reactors for 60 years and let things become less active. Then deal with it after performing a cost/benefit analysis. Even better, keep the reactors running for that time.
@jwestney28597 ай бұрын
Very informative video from Chris and Mark. THANK YOU!
@microburn7 ай бұрын
So excited for another mark episode. Thanks for the hot drop
@doniehurley93967 ай бұрын
This is the best of the best of the best educational youtube channel just pure class
@Zgembo1217 ай бұрын
Mark Nelson #1 🎉
@shawnnoyes46207 ай бұрын
Nice overview of Marcel Boiteux - Mark :)
@kowalityjesus7 ай бұрын
I was really surprised to learn that these are not in fact the same person
@scottmedwid18187 ай бұрын
Don't get me wrong, I have found most every Decouple Podcast video extremely informative. This, Mark Nelson explainer was extremely eye-opening for me. I learned a lot keep up the great work!
@TheSiphap7 ай бұрын
Thanks for your inspiring tell of one of our great man, he is frankly unknown to the great public. I hope some French media can help popularize Marcel Boiteux's story and determination. When I hear Mark, I feel really bad about the last 20 years and how we bought everything from the anti nuclear movement. Hearing it from a foreigner is important, nobody in French medias fought for nuclear until 2020.
@briancam_20007 ай бұрын
MSM which is generally ANTI-NUCLEAR popularize Marcel Boiteux's story, NO WAY
@diogovalada15226 ай бұрын
Where are the links for the reading material? They're not in the description?
@jasonneugebauer53102 ай бұрын
Excellent interview. We need to remember that safe nuclear power plants can be built quickly, reliably, and at a reasonable cost.
@sstachura7 ай бұрын
Mark speaks like a revolutionary. We are lucky he has taken such a sensible cause
@FixItStupid7 ай бұрын
Nuclear IS A RIP OFF & Cancer Lotto
@zwhitehead4037 ай бұрын
Well said
@stefanbernardknauf4677 ай бұрын
When I worked at Electrabel they flattered themselves to be the world's best Nuclear operator, with capacity factor above 95%! Even then EDF was only at around 75% if I remember well. Problem is that it is hampered a lot by public politics, for decades. It's a much bigger problem than the recent anti-nuclear feeling.. this is just another symptom of its political dependance in my opinion. But you're totally right, the capacity factor of the French nuclear fleet is a shame!
@FernandoWINSANTO7 ай бұрын
Why ... aging of industrial equipement is not a shame.
@stefanbernardknauf4677 ай бұрын
@@FernandoWINSANTO I admit that I'm not following the issues in French Nuclear power stations, but I doubt very much that it has to do with ageing. Rather major deficiencies in maintenance management.
@VarieTea7297 ай бұрын
@@stefanbernardknauf467 Yeah, EDF's maintenance schedules alternate between a refuelling and a more thorough inspection, every 12 months for the 3-loops and every 18 months for the 4-loops. That's normal, what's not normal is that the former take 6 weeks and the latter 3 entire months, if nothing goes wrong that is. And then every 10 years there's a license renewal inspection that lasts at the very least 6 months. I don't think such long maintenance periods are common anywhere else. The 3-loops in neighbouring Spain are also close to 40 years old but run at a 85% load factor.
@factnotfiction59157 ай бұрын
@@stefanbernardknauf467 The low c.f. is mostly about running the NPPs in load-following mode. Storage will make these reactors even more valuable.
@stefanbernardknauf4677 ай бұрын
@@factnotfiction5915 hm, I don't know about that. There is some load-following for sure but France does most of load-following with hydro and some conventional. Though France also increased its renewable fleet, requiring more load following. Going down to 50% is due to outages in any case.
@wired_toast7 ай бұрын
Not everything is great about our capacity factor; it's also slightly lower due to load tracking, which has its own merits
@volta2aire7 ай бұрын
55:55 The Shah of Iran-French nuclear connection.
@FernandoWINSANTO7 ай бұрын
Attack against his appartment in 1977.
@Petriiik7 ай бұрын
france is operating their nuclear fleet in load following mode, therefore they have low capacity numbers...if it is the only reason, is an another story.
@chapter4travels7 ай бұрын
Capacity factor is a terrible metric to judge electricity production. It makes unreliable sources look much better than they really are and reliable sources worse.
@chapter4travels7 ай бұрын
I couldn't sit through the whole thing but I can't imagine a scenario where electricity is too cheap.
@jeffbenton61837 ай бұрын
You're probably right. Clean electricity can get cheaper, but we're probably not going to reach a point where cost of electricity is negligible. On another note, I like to listen to these things while doing something else. It saves time and makes it easier to "sit through" (because I'm not sitting)
@louismechler43387 ай бұрын
it can become too cheap to pay for the system
@davieb82167 ай бұрын
It's crazy that you need a hero to build nuclear and can't just get it done by your regular engineer and accountants.
@fastSPX_906 ай бұрын
Although Mark Nelson provides informative insights, i often find his positions too black-and-white, not nuanced enough to accurately depict reality
@jasonneugebauer53102 ай бұрын
Bureaucracy over time can destroy any efficiency to the point of complete ruin. The only question is how long or short the span will be. Nuclear which should be our lest expensive most reliable electrical production system is often affected by bureaucracy and special interests to the point that it is impossible to build or even maintain and run a nuclear power plant at a profit. Bureaucracy and special interests have destroyed or made unprofitable most industries here in the United States. Examples: auto manufacturering, aluminum production, most mining, aerospace industries, nuclear power plant production, new petroleum processing plants, and most physical non agriculture products. Excluding weapons, we are great at producing weapons to be used elsewhere and also excluding software and technology design driven by profitability. To think that American bureaucracy can reshore the industry driven out of the US to a large extent by special interests and bureaucracy is an odd concept. I think the plan is to just redistribute wealth and have the bureaucrats manage the reindusrialisation. What could go wrong? 😢
@jenniferpatton5108Ай бұрын
They stupid #ToeRogaine quote needs to be retired because it is misogynistic and reactionary and spoils a good interview.