Marilyn Monroe vs. Kim Kardashian & the dress to end all dresses

Marilyn Monroe vs. Kim Kardashian & the dress to end all dresses. At the MET gala 2022, Kim wore the original "Mr President" dress, which Marilyn wore on JF Kennedy's birthday in 1962. This video explains the backlash, the idea behind the creation of the dress, Kim's PR strategy & what I think about the Ripley critics.
👉 WHAT I AM WEARING:
Silver hoop earrings + silver ring: bit.ly/2TngX9G
Black dress: Helmut Lang (from a past season)
Lipstick: MAC
👀 SEEN OR MENTIONED IN THIS VIDEO:
Kim's shapewear line, the "Kimono" controversy: • The Kim Kardashian sha...
My review of the MET gala 2022: • MET GALA 2022 red carp...
📽 MORE VIDEOS:
My video series on building a capsule wardrobe: bit.ly/2WuSB2L
New to the channel? Start with this playlist: bit.ly/3rBa5pC
💍 Shop my jewelry collection: bit.ly/2TngX9G
(Ethically & sustainably made, with recycled Sterling silver & 24K gold)
👗 Shop my clothing collection: bit.ly/2YqAxEz
(Yarns & fabrics sourced from the best European mills, production 100% in Europe)
💌 Register for my newsletter (max. 3x / month) + free capsule wardrobe checklist: www.justineleconte.com/newsle...
🥰 WHERE TO FIND ME:
Instagram: / justineleconte
Facebook: / justinelecontefashion
Pinterest: www.pinterest.de/jleconteberlin
Twitter: / justineleconteo
Business requests only:
[e-mail]
🎼 The music I use for my videos (free trial if you use this link)*: share.epidemicsound.com/snFtr
✂ MY FASHION DESIGN TOOLS*:
amzn.to/2GMeAHy
🎬 MY VIDEO EQUIPMENT*:
iPad: amzn.to/3e5qaOI
Screen protector for iPad (which feels like drawing on actual paper!): www.paperlike.com/justine
Pen for iPad: amzn.to/3AQoEK6
Main camera (newer version than mine): amzn.to/3k8iWNK
Main camera objective: amzn.to/2P9KAN8
Small camera: amzn.to/3hzboSp
Main microphone: amzn.to/3slAkjv
Small microphone: amzn.to/3rmXx3e
**************************
* Legal disclosure: these links are affiliate links. There are here for you to see the products and prices. If you buy a product through these links, I get a small share of the price (without the product being more expensive for you). You don’t have to use those links. It is up to you :-)
This video is not sponsored.
#fashion #METgala #marilynmonroe #kimkardashian

[@angelaa.9915]

“I wish people cared that much about where their own clothes come from.” Talk about an icon! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

[@calmbeforethestorm9498]

This is when I clapped. I love Justine.

[@angelaa.9915]

@@calmbeforethestorm9498 serious mic drop, she’s incredible!

[@celucero2]

Yes!

[@ValentinaFilic]

An absolute MIC DROP moment.

[@jessicabey275]

that's why I have decided to sew my own wardrobe. I can choose where and who makes the fabric. Ethically made labels are expensive and I cant afford it unfortunately, but I can support those who handweave on a loom loom from small villages and cities then I will

[@jauntydamemusic]

"Marilyn is perfect because she's gone, and every passing decade makes her even more perfect in the collective memory." YES. The dress was a publicity stunt, and now it's a publicity stunt again.

[@justineleconte]

that sums it up well

[@jeanlaubenthal698]

Marilyn is perfect because she was authentic.

@@jeanlaubenthal698 Sadly she wasn't. She was a very intelligent woman who admitted in her journal that she hated that men didn't take her seriously and only regarded her as an ornament. She was what the world wanted her to be and it broke her.

[@taylorphoe]

@ where is this journal :O

[@corimi7341]

It isnt about being perfect. We simply adore her AND the place in history she holds. Sure some things may be more important. This doesn't negate the fact that I don't want someone else in 2022 wearing it and certainly not being carless with it. Maybe not everyone thinks of it this deeply. I didn't know MM after all but she has a part in and a place in women's history. Its the Juxtaposition of KK for me. One women's struggle, achievement, art Aside someone with less esteem.

[@CatherineSews]

This is the most intelligent, thorough, thoughtful and balanced coverage of this dress that I have seen. It really helped me understand the whole phenomenon. So many good points, and all well explained. Thanks, Justine!

[@Chaotic_Pixie]

You should watch Abby Cox video for an in-depth discussion of why this is a problem and why it shouldn’t have happened. Extremely intelligent and thought out statements made by someone with the credentials to back it up. Clothing and textile history is her whole entire career.

[@Nelly-J]

@@Chaotic_Pixie I watched that one but seeing this video with the explanation of it being a copy I'm not sure it's such an issue as it was made out to be.

[@katiaiovine]

Le verità sono due. La prima è che il vestito di Marylin è caduto in mani sbagliate. La seconda è che alla kardashan stava malissimo. Brutto ma brutto assai..

[@mik20241]

@@Nelly-J Justine just explained that it’s NOT a copy. It was the original and didn’t actually fit her. The back had to be left open. That’s why she has the white stole covering her back side.

[@fredrika27]

@@Chaotic_Pixie Read my statement above! This happens more often than you think. I have a friend who worked for the Royal Opera House in London and Paris Opera. Both theaters have huge costume collections dating back several hundred years. For special events, these costumes are taken out, worn and even danced in. It's a huge honor to wear the same robes as Beverly Sills and Luciano Pavarotti!

[@scorpiomoon2535]

You brought up a lot of points I hadn’t even considered! Very thought provoking video. Personally, I didn’t have any moral outrage about the dress being lent out, I was just irritated with Kim for wearing the dress and damaging it. I’ve never been a fan of hers, I don’t really think her style is all that interesting, and I saw her choosing to wear Marilyn’s dress as a cheap move for the press, which as you aptly said, is “how the Kardashians operate”.

[@AA-hy6nb]

Kardash just proved one more time, what everybody has already known: she is just a vulgar rich woman, who has to "borrow" somebody's glory in order to shine in this reflected light. Marilyn was a great actress with a very tragic life & death. She was real, and so was her passion and her pain. And Kardash is just a simple moneybag, which cares only about profit.

[@violettababenko4847]

exactly, you just trashed her because you don't like her.

[@anastan5445]

I agree. If someone was to wear the dress, without altering it... That would have been ok, or ok-ish. But she had it modified Which... Not so great

[@jiminycricket6428]

She's like most people at the 'top', their self absorbed borderline 'narcissists'. That's why they are where they are, because they always want more and nothing they currently have is good enough. I think that's why people kick off about small things like this dress. It's not the dress, it's the excessiveness and self centered ego we can't stand. Especially in a time where excessiveness is causing so much destruction.

[@AA-hy6nb]

@@jiminycricket6428 Very well said! Thank you!

[@tuukkap601]

If this ain’t one of the most perfectly executed videos of 2022, I do not know what is. 0 nonsense, 0 clickbait, just hard facts. Keep it up, sister. ❤️‍🔥

[@justineleconte]

Thank you!!

[@jackietheall9307]

Thank you Justine for the history of the dress. You are right about, we need to be VERY CONCERNED about where WE OURSELVES are getting our clothes made. 😔

[@chenanigans]

That was a great point that shut it all down 😆. No one can point fingers cuz most of us have 3 pointing back! And also her other zinger was pointing out how Marylin gets more perfect as the decades go on. It reminds me of a quote "mean people never die". You can substitute any unsavory word. But point is we make people out to be so angelic and perfect once they pass. Marylin was prob just as scandalous as Kim lol. No need to be so emotionally distraught them two were kinda cut from the same cloth 🤣🤣(pun absolutely intended) 💁.

[@justineleconte]

@@chenanigans I liked your pun 😄

[@chenanigans]

@@justineleconte hey thanks! 😄😍

[@marylkap6498]

@@chenanigans No. They were NOT cut from the same cloth.

[@tanyas6643]

I was shocked that Kim… who had a different body type and skin tone… wanted to wear the original, because it didn’t fit… and she didn’t wear it as well (without undies) like Marilyn did. She also had a better fitting copy made, that she wore for the rest of the gala. Why not just wear that, for the red carpet too… and just mention it being “like Marilyn’s”? Probably because she wanted the “media drama” and perhaps the “I am important enough that I can get whatever I want.” 🤷🏻‍♀️

[@politereminder6284]

Of course she wanted the drama, and she got what she wanted. Same with Marilyn . She wore that dress purely to show off her hoeing around tendencies. (I mean Marilyn)

[@hmtqnikitashakur3399]

elite Hollywood narcissist at its finest!!

[@Peppermintytea]

"I wish people cared that much about where their own clothes come from." Yes! Stellar point and so well said. Not a fan of any of the K fam at all and still don't think she should have worn it but your video massively puts it all into perspective. Well done. Merci.

[@annaswanson5903]

💯

[@alkaloitongbam6684]

No gossip, no unnecessary backlash just straight to point!

[@mooreandless]

Exactly! She's a gorgeous straight talking smart French woman.

[@mimimimimi928]

Abby Cox did a video on this as well, from her perspective as a dress historian, and she explains really well why Kim Kardashian wearing this dress - even if it's just for four minutes - is a really big deal for dress and pop culture history. Most dress history departments in museums also don't have big budgets at all (people tend not to know how little money most museums have at their disposal, except the big ones of course), and the Met doesn't provide funding for their's at all. That's the whole reason why the Met Gala is even a thing in the first place. To secure funding. Unfortunately, only Ripley had the funds to buy this dress.

[@jchur7128]

Thanks for that background.

[@Silrielmavi]

+

[@kayelle8005]

I enjoyed Abby’s analysis too

[@nanda483]

This is really important information. Justine talked as if people who care about history didn't care about buying it when they had the opportunity forgetting that not all museums have the same money as the Louvre.

[@MsDeepAndDark]

@@nanda483 when you do research, there's always more things to uncover and more angles to be explored. It's likely that in preparation for the video Justine didn't have enough time to look into which museums could realistically afford to buy the dress. Alternatively, the info on museums' budgets might not be publicly available, hence impossible to compare.

[@rainfire632]

I would like to add to the comments recommending the video that Abby Cox put out about this dress and the reasons why museums may not have been able to purchase the dress even though they very likely would have if it had been possible. She does a fantastic breakdown of all of the points brought up here in this video as well, the social issues, the dress history, and down to in depth knowledge about the damage to the dress itself. I feel like possibly many people have not understood the trouble that clothing and costume historians and departments of museums have in accessing pieces. Justine pointed out the exact problem here too which is that people don't count it as an artform and something that should be value. As such museums get little to no funding for those departments and are struggling constantly to change the public's perception, interest, and value in this topic.

[@user-no2mz9hl4f]

It’s strange, because I find costume exhibits more interesting than paintings and sculpture. Clothes tell one so much about history and life from a time period.

[@DewelynC]

I don't think historical clothing should be worn by anyone. Period.

[@LindySellsHomes]

I wonder if Ripley’s understands that Kim wearing it REDUCED the value of the dress?

[@goofygrandlouis6296]

lol

[@seabreeze4559]

Sartorial necromancy. Very creepy and almost trying to steal her limelight. MM was degraded in her own time and now can't even have the one dress designed exactly for her. It's shameful another woman did this to her. Copycats should still be respectful and she had a replica ready to go. Should've made it match her own skin for same effect, as homage, not rip-off.

[@kellylappin5944]

Wonderful analogy! I couldn’t agree more!

[@marylkap6498]

She was not ALONE to do this. It was ...collaboration...

[@plumafina]

I call it sacrilege.

[@aesyamazeli8804]

Who cares? You don't own it not your problem.

[@MsElinorh]

I think you mean necrophilia. Necromancy is magic.

[@christa3224]

Wow, Justine. You did a terrific job of researching this topic and giving a fair and dispassionate assessment of the controversy. Great job! Personally, I don’t understand why she chose to wear the dress in the first place. She should have known it wouldn’t fit per proportions, no matter how much weight she lost. It also doesn’t flatter her skin tone. I think it’s always better to wear something that suits you rather than squeeze into something just because you think it’s pretty.

[@myladycasagrande863]

She had to wear the real one for the attention. Wearing a more flattering copy would have been completely forgettable and for a manufactured celebrity's lifestyle, attention is oxygen.

[@emapelikanova478]

@@myladycasagrande863 Like I get the need for attention but the dress didn't suit her nor fit her (dieting this way is kinda ...concerning). And if she was changing literally four minutes later, she could've had a more flattering version for herself, since the original was made with intention to look like nude dress. 🤷‍♀

[@traceyc130]

Justine said it well, it’s about the attention/publicity and in today’s 🌍 that equals $$$$

[@AA-hy6nb]

Kardash just proved one more time, what everybody has already known: she is just a vulgar rich woman, who has to "borrow" somebody's glory in order to shine in this reflected light. Marilyn was a great actress with a very tragic life & death. She was real, and so was her passion and her pain. And Kardash is just a simple moneybag, which cares only about profit.

[@molamolalaaa2968]

For attention, and publicity. That’s how their whole family business run.

[@anitraduke3616]

From what I understand, the Met, Winter have to approve the dresses. People are angry that they allowed it. Not just Ripley's.

[@hypatiakovalevskayasklodow9195]

That's what I am seeing to - but I do follow mostly people knowledgeable in historical costume and fashion - people are not against the actions of just Kim or just Ripley's, but the whole situation where something like this can even happen so easily for clout and profit

[@anitraduke3616]

@@hypatiakovalevskayasklodow9195 Exactly!

[@politereminder6284]

People are complaining that they want the dress in a museum. Kim wears it to a museum and people get all mad and huffy! 🙄

[@kobaltkween]

Just speaking as someone who went to graduate school with archivists (both professors and students), no, it's not a question if she damaged the dress. She did. Even if she was exactly Monroe's size and it was made of durable linen or cotton, just putting it on her body with her sweat and body oils and exposing it to light would have damaged it. But worse, this was a very delicate, one of a kind dress that didn't fit her at all. So the only question is how extensive and extreme is the damage she did. She had a replica that she wore most of the time, making wearing the most expensive dress in human history (literally) at all just an unnecessary stunt. Frankly, the situation is pretty simple. The owners of a priceless historical artifact allowed a celebrity to do irreparable damage to said historical artifact, for reasons that didn't outweigh the risk. Glen Close's clothes from her movies have been better cared for, and they are less valuable and only have historical relevance in terms of media history. Monroe's dress is relevant to US history or world history, depending on how you see JFK and that aspect of his life. Oh, and just because archivists and curators were horrified doesn't mean they were ever in a position to do anything to prevent it. Being in charge of curating doesn't mean you have all the funds you want. As commented, even the Met's clothing curators don't get funded enough to do that. I get your point, but it's not fair to assume the preservationists who care about this are the same people who control funds.

[@professorbutters]

100%. Thanks for pointing that out! Also, curators frequently don’t have that much power. They can say, “please don’t take that out of its low light controlled humidity storage,” but if someone with money and power wants to, they have to sit on the sidelines and worry.

[@Readyteddygo]

I couldn’t agree more

[@bev9708]

EXCELLENT points Justine!!! Scientifically, it is impossible that the dress was not damaged JUST in her putting it on whether or not the damage is visible!! I absolutely cannot agree that KK is comparable to MM as a cultural icon, however, no!!! It is this illusion that KK is so obviously trying to cultivate by wearing the dress!

[@theprousteffect9717]

Just because you can loan out an iconic piece of fashion history doesn't mean you should. Part of the value of that dress was that Marilyn was the last (and only) person to ever wear it. It was hers, and it was even her wish that she be the only one to wear it. Kim should have worn the replica she had made the entire night, and made a donation to Ripley's. She still could have generated buzz for herself, Ripley's, and introduced Marilyn to a younger generation of people without damaging a piece of iconography.

[@luzdeld]

It just a dress. All material things get destroy at some point. Its more important that we dont destroy earth because we live on it.

[@andreaandrea6716]

@@luzdeld I agree that the Environment is WAY WAY WAY more important!! In fact, it's EVERYTHING! Apropos the dress... I think a lot of the indignation has to do with people being bothered by the fact that ALL KK seems to care about is herself. It's the narcissism that bothers me. What do you think? I personally don't care about Marilyn Monroe one way or another. But I do care about Art and Fashion (that it transform itself into an Ethical industry). And I DO care that KK walks around doing whatever she likes 'BECAUSE SHE CAN' without any thought given to anyone else. I don't like that she is 'an influencer' because her values are questionable. That's my objection; The promotion of selfishness.

[@emdeejay5515]

@@andreaandrea6716 I agree with all you say but I would add in my case I do “care about Marilyn Monroe one way or another.” (Long story there: for one thing, I am old enough to remember her and remember when she died) - What you say about the promotion of the value of selfishness is spot on, and a sad thing in our present world. I did enjoy this video of Justine’s very much. Justine, your knowledge and your charm pull me back to your videos time and again! Thank you! 💛💜

[@tara7550]

but Kim wearing her replica would have negated the whole point , to basically pick on an American icon and destroy the memory of Marilyn being the ONLY one to have warn the dress which was her intention. The dress was personal as was the relationship she had with the Kennedy family. Totally agree with your point, just because you own a dress that's iconic doesn't mean you should lend it out to whomever. I wonder how folk would feel if say the Picasso painting was lent out to someone who wanted to use for a party back drop or the Queen's wedding dress used at an end of year school play. Owners of iconic history pieces have a responsibility to respect their collection and what it means to history and it's impact on culture, hence historical building guidelines for those who buy castles and old colonial homes. Ripley abused their commercial right over the dress and basically trashed its history and its emotional meaning to the American people. The whole affair just highlights how some elites feel entitled so long as they donate money to something, their behaviour is inexcusable. Some things are worth more than publicity and money.

[@jchur7128]

@@andreaandrea6716 I watched maybe 20 seconds of a short video where Kim is taking the viewer through her refurbished private jet, where her fresh flowers had to match the a colour scheme! Her mindset is revolting- it is brutish and uncivilised.

[@sadiedavenport]

I don't think it's hypocritical for museums to be upset that an artifact was damaged just because they didn't purchase it. There could be a lot of reasons for that other than that they didn't want it or that they don't value fashion as high art.

[@pbtraveler694]

Right. Museums are interested in historic artifacts, that is their expertise, so naturally they have strong opinions about such things.

[@corimi7341]

I think this review by Justine (I respect you but I do not agree on this one ) is over simplified

[@hotjanuary]

@@corimi7341 this. We have photographic evidence of the dress being stretched out with some stones missing. We have so many textile conservationists talking about how the dress would have been damaged even if someone smaller than Marylin wore it because of body oils, movement, and UV exposure. The cotton gloves were a terrible choice because they catch on the material. Conservationists say the dress should have only been handled with nitrile gloves. “I wish people cared this much about where their own clothes came from.” Justine makes the mistake of thinking people can’t do both, and because this was her focus, she didn’t bother doing more research.

[@RudesMom]

Many (probably most) museums have a "scope of interest" when collecting and preserving. A textile museum won't collect an Apple computer. A glass museum glass won't be interested in collecting baseballs. The museum of the American Revolution isn't going to be in the business of collecting JFK political memorabilia or 19th century Chinese export pottery. That doesn't mean that they don't care or "should have bought it" if they cared. This is a reminder that private collectors are have no obligation to actually care for the items in their collections. That said, I'm not sure a museum would ever be interested in hiring whatever "experts" went along with this stunt.

[@dinky..]

@@corimi7341 I agree with you!

[@Alicja237]

Ms Kardashian is like Cindirellas's sister, trying to fit the beautiful shoe that was not hers. Wanted to be iconic too😂

[@goofygrandlouis6296]

Haha, that's a good metaphor actually. 😉

[@michelleduncan9965]

And Kim ALWAYS FAILS MISERABLY to be even a bit above verage, much less "iconic."

[@clockwatch5222]

I've heard the expression of stepping into someone else's shoes. Kim stepping into Monroe 's dress and butchering it, shows she is no original. 🤷‍♀️

[@hypatiakovalevskayasklodow9195]

"I would like to address the dress" awwh you're so proud of that rhyme and I'm proud of you for it!

[@justineleconte]

hehehe English isn't my mother tongue so I'm not so good at puns... 😅

[@itsdonuttime7729]

@@justineleconte it was funny lmao. You are very good at English.

[@ad6417]

What's interesting is nobody says that Kim Kardashian is fat yet many people falsely believe Marilyn Monroe was plus size. Even after a starvation diet Kim couldn't fit into that dress.

[@kellyvaters1689]

From the perspective of fashion historians, the sins committed were many and egregious - and they could have serious ramifications for the Met's Costume Institute, in support of which the Met Gala is held each year. Can the Institute maintain its integrity as a museum dedicated to the conservation and research into historical dress when, it appears, it depends for its funding on donations from elites who may then turn around and borrow historically-significant garments to wear, in direct violation of its mission. Worse yet is that Kim was enabled in this by the Met Gala board itself (headed by Anna Wintour), furnished with a room in which she could change into the replica. While there has been a long association between modern fashion media and the Met Gala (Diana Vreeland had headed the Board before Wintour), there seems to be a growing conflict in motive between the organizers of the Gala and the Institute that the event is intended to benefit. It does not help that Wintour has paid an inordinate degree of attention to the Kardashian-Jenner clan, perhaps beyond what would be appropriate for the editor-in-chief of the world's most famous fashion magazine.

[@user-oj5bw7sl8p]

My sentiments exactly!

[@clarafawzy6009]

Thank you Justine, you are just a practical, knowledgeable person and I do enjoy watching the videos you make because I know I will benefit something out it.

[@scalylayde8751]

In the US, a lot of museums separate their budgets by department. Many museums didn't even have an art history department until recently (if they even do now) that could have tried to buy the dress. Fashion history departments that/have existed are often really underfunded compared to the other departments in their institution because the field is so devalued. Also, clothing and fabric is a particularly vulnerable type of artefact. Clothes rarely live more than a couple hundred years, especially ones made with already delicate fabrics. I personally think the outrage has been kind of amazing, because fashion historians have been struggling to have their field taken seriously for so long, that getting this public attention in viewing a garment as a historical artefact is an amazing win for the field. As for people caring about where their own clothes come from... I take your point, and I'm 100% on the same page as you on this issue at large, but I don't think it's a fair comparison to make in this situation. This is more about history, art, and curatorial ethics than it is about clothing. The artefact just happens to be a dress, is all.

[@weitingtam]

Great content, Justine! 💛 What a world of knowledge you have about fashion. Been following your content since 2015 (long time fan 💖)

[@ronjakh]

Marilyn Monroe should have been the last person to ever wear this dress. But just look at how they are manhandling the dress whilst trying to close it over her behind! That is so irresponsible. Ripley are the owners but they clearly have no respect for the items in their collection. Fashion items are rated lower than others because they are in the female realm. You will find that across all hobbies or collectables. Female interests are seen as superficial, fluff, a waste of time and money.

[@naomania3619]

The V&A in London and Dundee do have occasional exhibitions of dresses. I visited on such exhibition a few years ago. All the dresses on display had been worn by famous women. A number of award winning actresses and the late Diana, Princess of Wales. The exhibition was well curated and presented but I found it all rather sad. Without the beautiful women to wear them, the dresses lost something of their lustre. Despite being exquisitely made, of the finest fabrics, they looked sad. They reminded me of Victorian frames of butterflies pinned to a board. Their wings dusty and dull. Dresses are meant to be worn

[@theplaylister]

Then MM's estate should not have sold it or under strict conditions. The dress never had a zipper. It was very carefully handled by professionals and only worn for 4min.

[@ronjakh]

@@naomania3619 Yes! The V&A have amazing collections, and they do these types of exhibits once in a while, but they are the exception and not the rule. Collectables exclusively in the female realm are still not valued as highly as items men typically collect, this is a fact. If you look around a bit you will see it for yourself.

[@ronjakh]

@@theplaylister Nope. They shouldn’t have sold it but Ripley also have a responsibility towards the artifacts they own and display. You can literally see a clip in this video that they are pulling the dress really vigorously trying to close it over Kim’s rear end, but failing! Such a fragile fabric should never be handled like that. Period.

[@asthenamesuggests9513]

@@ronjakh did you not watch the video? It's literally privately owned, it's theirs. Sure it's history, but it's theirs. Buy the dress if you want to protect it so much :)

[@patriciacinea3097]

Thank you for the clarity on this topic.

[@lanef58]

Always informational and delightful to watch your videos! Thank you for the breakdown of the dress!

[@thetrillianaire]

While I personally don't care much about the dress specifically, a lot of people do. If someone bought a cherished painting by Rembrandt (or someone of equivalent historical significance) and stabbed it all over with a knife, in our current system it's completely legal for them to do so, but that doesn't make it okay. Legal and moral are different concepts. Some things are part of our shared human history. More and more people are angry about the wealth inequality inherent in capitalism and seeing how the super-rich can buy widely-cherished unique historical items for themselves and trash them understandably emphasizes the immense unearned power and privilege of the ruling class. They're doing the same thing to the Earth, a thing that surely should belong to all of us.

[@Turtletoots3]

I believe no one was meant to ever wear that dress after MM. Kind of takes a dump on the whole point of the dress.

[@SILVIATHEGIRLS]

Huge thumb up for this video Justine 💕 I didn't know any of this story! It is always great to hear such stories from you. You explain things very well and very objectively , with such depth and intelligence, so glad I have watched it! Thank you so much for this video 🙏🏻 Love, Sil x

[@angelaberke5476]

Thanks for this! The most sensible video on this topic I've seen or heard!

[@YamIa3gypsy]

Hi Justine, Fabric is art and so is the designs of how to wear it! I frequent thrift stores to find amazing fabrics to repurpose. Not all Americans follow the Kardashians, tell the world!!! You look so content and happy, and I am happy for you that you have found your home at last. 🌸

[@brandyjean7015]

I too prefer thrifting. I call it my urban hunting.

[@TheBaumcm]

I prefer thrift as well for many reasons The fabric has likely been washed, which means I know how it will wear. It is less expensive if you gain or lose weight or need temporary clothing, which also reduces the demand for fast fashion. Things cost less so then I don’t feel compelled to hold on to them forever if someone else can use them. You can find some really luxe and nicely tailored items, like Brooks Brothers pants, several higher end dresses (including a Halston from Bergdorf Goodman), and cashmere sweaters.

[@jisforjae]

This is such a great analysis on the Marilyn vs Kim dress controversy. I initially thought it was a wild idea for Marilyn's dress to be loaned to Kim, however, you've brought up a lot of great points and counterarguments that I think the collective society should think about. I think the biggest takeaway (that you touched on) is we should regard fashion as a true art form, if we want to keep iconic pieces from pop culture sacred. Also, we should feel the same away about the fashion we consume (*cough* fast fashion *cough*). All in all, a great video as always, Justine!

[@AD-wm9if]

Based on the fact that she caused tears in the dress, I'm good with her being excommunicated from popular culture.

[@justineleconte]

Note: the before/after close-ups on the dress were a) poorly lit and b) out of focus. Hardly a good basis for comparison ;-)

[@luzdeld]

@@AD-wm9if It just a dress. All material things get destroy at some point. Its more important that we dont destroy earth because we live on it.

[@atuvera9021]

@@luzdeld we can use that argument on everything historical so. A painting of Leonardo Da Vinci got destroyed "oh, its just a painting", the church of Nothre Dame caught con fire "it was an old church anyways"... Idk about that... I think we should care about historical artifacts as well as how fast fashion is having an impact on earth. History is important to share how was life in diferent eras. We need to preserve the few things that hold value to be able to learn from our predesesors. Edit: typo. Oops.

[@helycrisea8189]

@@atuvera9021 Thank you very much for your comment, you are quite right.

[@lynnpetti3817]

I really appreciated your perspective. Informative and helpful. Thanks

[@jessee7303]

My first time here! I appreciate your balanced approach to this topic! Thank you for your research!

[@Chaotic_Pixie]

1. Ripley’s has been applying for museum accreditation for years. They’ll never get it now. 2. That’s the point of the controversy. The MET gala exists because the fashion history portion doesn’t get allocated funding. The Met has set back the credibility of fashion history by being complicit. 3. Please watch Abby Cox’s video. She’s a historian on fashion and textile history. She explains why this is a massive issue and why we should be angry and outraged and why we should be funding clothing history. 4. She may have gotten press and publicity but it was in the worst way possible. So many people have unfollowed her and sworn off supporting her. 5. The real losers here are women and women’s work and our contributions to society because that’s what’s being scoffed at… by Ripley’s and Kim.

[@politereminder6284]

Women are losing? 👀😳 HOW? Y'all are just too much. Too many feelings!

[@60Airflyte]

Nonsense.

[@michaeltoolin8468]

The designer of the dress is Bob Mackie; he sketched the dress in 1962 for Jean Louis. Amazingly he had only recently graduated from college. It would be interesting to know his point of view on the situation. I think for many people this boils down to a matter of respect and understanding. Even if one knows or cares nothing about fashion history or design, demonstrating a level of respect and appreciation for the passion and effort others put into their craft is always classy.

[@lizziebkennedy7505]

Respect is to understand how the industry works. Designers’ staff don’t get credit. You work your apprenticeship and build your know,she and skills. Design don’t freestyle; if you look at Jean Louis’ ranges at that time, the fabrication and adornment are all consistent. Mackie was 23 years old and working to a brief. To inflate his role is just disrespectful. Do we know the name of every junior designer who worked for Mackie when he was dressing Cher? Of course not, nor should we.

[@michaeltoolin8468]

@@lizziebkennedy7505 Wow, you really took what I said out of context. I neither meant to overinflate Bob Mackie nor insult Jean Louis, I erroneously assumed that everyone knew that such was the case in the industry without getting offended if someone pointed it out. I'm sure you haven't gone on Twitter to tell Bob Mackie off for posing with his sketches next to the dress at Ripley's. And yes, there are people who know and care about the work of junior designers who work for major designers and/or at major fashion houses. When I spoke of what Bob Mackie's opinion might be and respect for the work of others I wasn't referring to Bob Mackie or Jean Louis and the designing of the dress but the situation in general that is being discussed which includes the dress and by extension the fashion industry. Showing respect for the work of others can be applied to all people and in all types of disciplines.

[@beatemyburgh824]

You are so knowledgeable. Thank you for always bringing a high-quality video.

[@shathahaemeed8694]

Love the way you have tackled the comparison between the two.well done

[@LumyTheQueen]

I always thought the dress was indeed loaned from a museum. Knowing it was from a private collection puts a completely new perspective on this story and I thank you for making such a well informed video.

[@patgentry7268]

Great to hear an extended discussion of the place of fashion in culture and history, along with a current controversy! Lots in your talk I did not know, so thank you for all that research. Making the point about people caring where their own clothes come from is GREAT! We don’t think about the harm to nature we do as we choose our clothes. All the best from SF, and hope your new house is coming along according to plan.

[@wendyjomendy]

At any rate you have done a thorough job at answering any questions i wouldve had! Great job inspector!

[@galeocean4182]

Justine, there was so much more to this story than I imagined! thanks for the in-depth scoop.

[@allthingswavy6420]

Your excellent commentary actually allowed me to focus on what my own gripe with KK wearing the dress had been. I realized that I have had the impression that she does whatever she can for press, without much awareness of what the real cost (other than financial) to others may be. That is only my impression; I do not know her personally. But this video made me think about my initial response more deeply. Thank you!!

[@annescholten9313]

Thank you for sticking/focussing on the facts!!!!

[@anhpham6506]

Thank you for the careful research and analysis. Always love to hear your thought.

[@NatariSaito]

Love the lighting in this new setup!

[@sharon339]

Good points Justine! My takeaway from all this is that we should always wear clothes in the correct size that fits us correctly. 🤭

[@speyerliebe]

I really loved this video! Thanks for again providing informed analysis, and giving all the angles 👍🏼

[@VT-wq9dj]

Great video! Thanks for a lot of interesting facts I have not heard/read about !

[@klf153]

Totally enjoyed this post, Justine!!

[@bluejay5531]

thank you for your intelligent in depth analysis, which makes a lot of sense, of course, rationally. It does not make me feel better about somehow ruining something precious, a memory...I am nostalgic, romantic, in love with vintage retrò style, old movies and the like, and beyond all the cold facts, press/money/etc aspects, it just pained me because Marilyn is special to me while the other woman I consider a symbol of so much that is simply trash in our modern culture, including of course "the way they function" and the fact that money can buy and destroy anything... bisous...looking forward to your nest house updates!

[@slporter722]

I love your topics and your analysis. So interesting and insightful.

[@annaswanson5903]

💯lots of people made similar videos but the analysis sets it apart

[@mimideolloqui-turner1209]

You are wonderful! Thank you for your perfect research. Mimi

[@bonniek356]

Excellent well-rounded perspective!

[@GBSA09]

Justine… this is your best video yet!! I LOVED your take on the whole situation and putting things into perspective. And seeing the bigger picture. Also assessing who benefited from all this drama and free publicity… it was spot on! Look forward to updates from your home refurb

[@maryl.8417]

P. S. I loved hearing the detailed history of the dress. I vaguely remember her singing this song to him. How scandalous it was then, even without the internet. 😇

[@justineleconte]

ooooh yes, it was on the first page of pretty much all newspapers and co.

[@susansawatzky3816]

I remember seeing it on tv

[@jchur7128]

@@justineleconte I am sure the newspapers’ circulation skyrocketed. Marilyn Monroe remains spectacular in terms of physical beauty, to name one of her attractions. Celebrities today have millions of dollars at their disposal for Botox, fillers, wigs, padded dresses, makeup and hair artists, stylists, dieticians and physical trainers etc., yet no-one comes close to diminishing or superseding the beauty of Marilyn Monroe. In contrast to greedy, materialistic Hollywood Marilyn Monroe lived a modest lifestyle. According to Marilyn Monroe’s housekeeper she had a small personal wardrobe and could often be seen in the same dress. There are many profoundly moving and disturbing facts about the life of Marilyn Monroe - her profound vulnerability and sensitivity are palpable. But Marilyn was loved in her lifetime and achieved greatness in her work.

[@iratedwithfrauds5592]

@@jchur7128 the original face of Norma Jean was altered to become MM. Her greatest sorrow was her inability to conceive a much desired child. Arthur Miller pointed out to her about the extreme power she had over men. Yet, being childless destroyed her.

[@schizonya]

Very very smart analyze! ALways love your sharp and witty POV, Justine :)

[@yvettemor7282]

What a refreshing point of view. Thank you for speaking up!

[@tihanaharrison6728]

What a fantastic job you did of getting all the relevant points across as well as call out all the museum's who 'weren't there' when the dress was being sold at a public auction. Brilliantly researched, beautifully presented, as always, and I cannot give this video enough likes! Thank you, Justine, for another great video!

[@ljupkan3873]

Jeeej, I love Justine's investigative videos 😊❤️

[@beajaro4186]

Fantastic and informative video, Thank you Justine👍

[@c.r.reayhutchinson2504]

Terrific research, Justine. Very informative. Thank you.

[@sonadvorakova1458]

It wouldn’t be such a big deal if MM herself hadn’t specifically expressed her wish that the dress wouldn’t be worn by anyone else ever again.

[@larkmacgregor3143]

If she felt that way, truly, why didn't she have it destroyed after she wore it?

[@sonadvorakova1458]

@@larkmacgregor3143 Why would she do that? The dress is a masterpiece. It would be a crime to destroy it.

[@froggy9191]

@@larkmacgregor3143 she probably didn't take into account that someone would be fame hungry enough to disrespect those wishes.

[@larkmacgregor3143]

@@sonadvorakova1458 Is it really? Then why did none of the big museums with a lot of money behind them phone up some of their donors and say "The fabric equivalent of the Mona Lisa is up for auction - won't you help us acquire it?" Because if it really was more than just a scandalous pop culture moment, and worth saving no matter who had worn it or why, then legitimate museums should have been doing their best to add it to their collections. Not one of them, even the Smithsonian, bid on it.

[@sonadvorakova1458]

@@larkmacgregor3143 I don’t even know how to respond to that. It is one of the most beautiful and most famous dresses in the world, made specifically for Marilyn Monroe. That’s a fact. Deal with it. The owner of the dress should have respected her wish. Why they didn’t, is beyond me.

[@laurab8450]

Question: Who wore it better? My opinion is MARILYN wore it better! Kim shouldn't have horned in on another's fame, she should get her own iconic dress if she wants one.

[@paular6547]

Short and sweet, thanks Justine!

[@clANAnett]

I LOVED this video and learned so much!!

[@garssympa500]

I don't know how you can compare a woman who is famous for simply being famous and Marilyn, a critically-acclaimed actress whose beauty will go down in history. Kim? Not so much.

[@sarahwatts7152]

I like the point that other institutions had ample opportunity to buy the dress themselves, that hasn't been widely discussed in my circles. What I didn't know was that Ripley's price was a steal in that market! It all just looks like big numbers to me.

[@brooke9297]

Just because they had the opportunity, doesn’t mean they had the funding.

[@flowermeerkat6827]

Super, thoughtful commentary! Thank you Justine!

[@anitas5817]

Excellent analysis Justine! Very interesting!

[@gorejs8396]

Merci, Justine! As usual, I learned something from your video. Excellent overview of the MM dress issue. I'm bored by KK & her relentless clickbait stunts, but the dress's owner allowed her to wear it, even though she's bigger & shaped differently than MM. As you say, brilliant publicity on Ripley's part, & pretty good coverage (pun intended) for KK as well. I'm glad she only wore it for mere minutes to get up those stairs & didn't (I hope!) sit down in it at any point. And thank you for pointing out how the dress was constructed. Even if that garment spends all its time on a static mannequin, those rhinestones will eventually pull out of the oh, so delicate fabric as it deteriorates over time. Wearing clothing gives them life, so it's nice that MM's party dress got to attend one more party. I hope Ripley's leaves it on the mannequin after this, however, because it's a historical artifact & part of an interesting & rather sad story. The night out with KK just added a rather bizarre appendix to that story, I guess.

[@selectiveoutrage6617]

The designer, Jean Louis, made a very similar dress years before, worn by Marlene Dietrich for her Las Vegas cabaret act. She also wore it on TV for a special which I remember watching as a child. She basically stood in one spot for nearly an hour while she sang and talked because she had been sewn into that sparkly dress.

[@sophiegoarin2903]

intéressant ! je n'avais pas vu ça sous cet angle, merci 😊👍

[@littlemissfrany]

Passionnant ! merci Justine pour toutes ces précisions !

[@mallorywidmark]

Can you make a video about Marilyn Monroes fashion? I would love to see that 😊

[@carolinacarvalho2351]

Yesss, please do that Justine😽😽😽

[@karensykas3809]

The Channel "The Ultimate Fashion History" has that done very well!

[@lee-annebarrett366]

Thank you for explaining. Unfortunately Kim Kardashian has a massive ego and thinks she can do what ever she likes, because of her money and celebrity status. It should never have been worn by anyone. Is someone now, going to want to wear her Some like it Hot dress. I hope not.

[@TMB62]

You definitely bought up points I hadn't considered. Thanks for this new insight.

[@AnonyMous-uy4hk]

Love that this channel is so unbiased - good quality content with just facts!

[@Caritasaveritas]

Thank you for researching and filming this post. Very thoughtful and logical.💕

[@msamios.321]

Thank you. The fact that they keep calling Ripley’s a museum drives me nuts!

[@varduhi81]

Ohhhh. Best coverage of this story. Interesting, intelligent. Thank you ❤️

[@virginiagarner8436]

Fabulous video and analysis ...as always, Justine!

[@AMarie_USA]

Thank you for the concise breakdown on the dress itself. I have very mixed feelings especially due to this being an historical garment and the overall fragility of a museum-worthy piece being worn decades later. I almost wish Kim had had a dress made specifically for her (by perhaps a new designer/different dress), just as Marilyn did.

[@danyf.1442]

She wore a copy for the rest of the evening, which makes ruining the original even worse.

[@justineleconte]

she wore a copy of another Marilyn dress, a dark green one.

[@danyf.1442]

@@justineleconte that was for the after party, for the event proper it looks like she wore a copy of the nude dress.

[@reikun86]

I wonder if there are other dresses made of satin souffle that are still out there. It sounds like a really interesting type of fabric.

[@susansheldon2033]

Just to clear up one point: in the USA you cannot take any tax benefits for a charitable donation made in your name. The person who gave the actual donation gets the tax break and the donation must be to a charity recognized by the IRS. Kim gets the tax credit for the 2 donations she made to Orlando charities, not Ripley's.

[@JR-jd3xm]

Thank you Justine ! You are so smart ! 🎉❤

[@JaneDoe-ci3gj]

An excellent video as always!👍 A very insightful video! I agree with you on all points! There's a lot of echo in the room where you're sitting, makes it a bit hard to hear sometimes!

[@nightsky6413]

Loved this video. Straight to the point and very informative. ❤️

[@janfranklin2114]

Her videos always are. No rambling, gets to the point and always well thought out and pertaining to the topic.

[@geniej2378]

Really great video! I think some of the outrage was that the dress wasn't even on theme and Kim was using it purely to create a "viral moment" aka free press. It was disrespectful to the event and the garment at once.

[@colettebelier9970]

Thank you for this enlightment. Very interesting. Love it.

[@hannamay1177]

Great discussion. Thank you so much Justine!

[@bellebb8673]

Very interesting points. What I found shocking about K wearing that dress has nothing to do with fashion. If, for example, she had worn Marilyn's iconic white "steam grate" dress I would not have given it a second thought. It was the juxtaposition of this dress and the Madison Square event with the political historical context of that time that really makes this more than about fashion, or actually not about fashion at all. M's affairs with the Kennedy brothers, the FBI scrutiny of that, the rumors of a dove-tailing of Hollywood, politics, and organized crime, the changing nature of what was taboo to the press, the over- the- top sexuality of the dress basically confirming the affairs, not to mention Jackie being in the audience, the beginnings of a sexual revolution in the US, all added up to a very unique turning point in US politics which was occurring at that time. Kim K may be a somethimg of a cultural phenomenon now but her influence doesnt come close to how this dress symbolized a critical historical time. It's like K tried to piggyback that for more exposure and just miserably failed. In a hundred years, that event at Madison Square Garden will still be historically and politically significant while the Kardashians will be a footnote along with 80s aerobic knee socks and plastic 70s dresses.

[@user-oj5bw7sl8p]

My sentiments exactly! Kardash-flock should have kept their greedy hands away from Marilyn's dress.

[@PlantagenetRose]

It’s a bad business move as well. The last and only person to wear that dress was Marilyn. Her measurements, her one night wearing of the dress. It was iconic. It’s value is basically destroyed by being worn more than once and by another person.

[@justineleconte]

I bet that the dress will be worth more now, from a collector's perspective ;-)

[@klmjtr]

@@justineleconte I would think that it would have gone down in value as it seems “tarnished” now.

[@purpurina5663]

Apart from being fitted for Marilyn, it was made to match her skin tone, so she would appear nude and covered in diamonds. That effect was of course lost on Kim.

[@blktauna]

@@purpurina5663 a lot of things are lost on that K person

[@rayneforresy640]

@@klmjtr well i wouldn't know since I'm no collector. But the fact it made a buzz and garnered interests immediately is enough to make people remember that someone (aka Ripley) have such a valuable art piece.

[@lisetvillalta9678]

Thank you for bringing this topic back to earth

[@deborahhanna4397]

Excellent commentary, Justine!

[@MultiStephanator]

Thank you Justine.. very informative and interesting… I respect you so much in your research and decision to do a video on this topic… and that you are concerned about the rest of the people caring more about where our clothing comes from.. very important message there.. Aloha