I believe the first resultant equation's end should be -kx, shouldn't it?
@backbench3rs6593 жыл бұрын
in equation (2) two terms cancel out because of same value but opposites in sign ... and BTW excellent way of teaching thanks
@aliozturk577 жыл бұрын
You had a sign mistake in the second equation (for pendulum). Some terms could have been canceled at there!
@ismailtageldin54358 жыл бұрын
thank you very much for this, really appreciate the effort you put in your videos :)
@prettyd315 жыл бұрын
the pause at 9:57 is awesome
@SayedMohameds2 жыл бұрын
Hello Rhett, I highly appreciate your work, It is really helpful. I have a technical question, if the whole system rotate around Z-axis, how can I update the equations of motion. If you have a reference that it might help. I would be really grateful. Thank you
@hostkakamay25773 жыл бұрын
Nice explanation, but I get stuck with The natural frequency of the systems
@chaimaak99497 жыл бұрын
what if we had an other pendulum atteched to the first one :/ HOW CAN WE FIND THE LAGRANDE ? I DID IT BUT IT WASS SO LONG
@bckahraman8 жыл бұрын
Can someone tag me on a problem like this one solved in a book ? I am searching but I can not find an equation of motion solution of this kind of problem..
@anirbandas61226 жыл бұрын
Thanks,, it was very helpful
@TrueValueResearch8 жыл бұрын
Why is it that your potential for the pendulum is not mgL(1-cos(theta))?
@Sapien_by_chance5 жыл бұрын
guess he has made a mistake there. should be mgl(1-cos (theta)).
@alejandromoreira98964 жыл бұрын
IT IS CORRECT, U=0 at y2=0 , x=0 . -m2*g*L(1-cos(theta)) when U=0 at y2=-L , x=0 .
@michaelreynolds48497 жыл бұрын
you dropped the 2 in the original equation for T in the part 2*L*X_dot*Theta_dot*cosTheta