Matt Finn: Theories of Everything | Thunderbolts

[@hoptoads]

It's so refreshing to hear someone say the obvious - " we just don't know " when it comes to the age and beginning of the universe, instead of instantly resorting to " current theory ".

[@andyman8630]

we *DO* know! it's right under our nose! simply apply Occams' Razor! it is perfectly described by the first law of thermodynamics (aka the law of conservation of energy) the Universe *is eternal*

[@brokenmess9921]

Please tell me if this is accurate: Mathematics is a precise language. Very precise, but as with all language you can say impossibilities . "I was on a set of stairs, no matter how many steps I took, in whichever direction, I just kept going up" impossibility

[@andyman8630]

@@brokenmess9921 maths is a very precise language which can describe both fantasy and reality equally well e.g. Unicorns are mathematically possible *but they don't exist*

[@ArchonOne]

andyman said it as well as I could. I'd invite you to go watch someone break down the strength of the Incredible Hulk, and how much he could lift to watch the exact language of math being used to describe fiction. Or even better; go listen to someone describe the physics of black holes. Oddly though it's worse than that. It's almost like a priest class with their own secret language they know, but you don't... and if you don't, you get no voice. Well, Stephen Crothers learned their language and points out how ridiculous and fake it is. Diving by 0 and assigning physical characteristics to it is the only way we know black holes are real. Think about it for a second. This truly is the treason of the intellectual. No wonder these guys were hanging out on a certain island. @@brokenmess9921

[@ArchonOne]

This is Matt, the narrator. Hope you all enjoyed the show! Thanks for watching and spread the word!

[@stevenpipes1555]

Ive been spreading these words ever since i discovered the work of Wall Thornhill, rest his soul, many years ago. Unlike any other theory I've ever come across, this one just keeps becoming clearer and clearer the deeper i dig. Thank you for bearing the weight of the heavier shovel fulls. I have found so many whom i now count among my great heroes through this set of ideas and studies. Id like to add David Talbot whos "Remembering the end of the world" led me to Wall, and the EU, in the first place. Also Rupert Sheldrake whos work may not be considered part of the electric universe theory, i believe they are deeply intertwined and will be remembered as such. The more i learn about the electric universe, the more standard cosmology just seems like Ancient Aliens or flat earth.

[@corkygoss7403]

Love your voice and "tude. May I suggest MFMP on YT. The synergies are purely wonderful. I can die happy.

[@ArchonOne]

I’ll look

[@dennisburt4614]

Great job mattalways interested in listening to anyone that starts with the so called experts

[@reefsroost696]

I enjoy the video greatly. Gives me a bit to ponder. Thanks.

[@nobigbang825]

The universe is breathtaking, but the assertion they know its age and when it will end with a haughty straight-face is even more breathtaking. Thanks for a brilliant video.

[@Admiral8Q]

Quite honestly it's almost as dumb as the 5000 year old universe theory. 😉

[@marcv2648]

I really like these Matt Finn videos. I also like his style.

[@Admiral8Q]

I particularly like his sarcastic humour.

[@sonenstahl]

I absolutely love this video. 40+ years ago in highschool I knew there was something wrong with the idea of a speed limit of light. It just seemed wrong. The EU has really expanded my understanding. Then came the realization that Newton's force equations include gravity but doesn't have a time variable really validated it. I absolutely love this group and the thought provoking discussions. "Black holes are where God divided by zero," made me giggle.

[@Admiral8Q]

I got in trouble in high-school for asking, "If two spaceships are traveling towards each other at 99.9% the speed of light, and one turns on it's high beams (headlights) Then how fast is the light going when the other ship sees it?" My teacher sent me to the counselor. 🙄 Needless to say I "failed" that class for always asking questions rather than doing what what was drilled into me.

[@jerrywalls8866]

The rope analogy was awesome. Such a great explanation of the difference between light and gravity.

[@skepticalgenious]

Really? I thought it was not a close enough representation. I mean the rope still has slack, torsion and elasticity or tensile strength. But I can't find any closer expression. For adding more complexity stumps me. So I guess it is pretty decent.

[@multi_misa72]

So awesome. Thank you. A guru once said, " what's wrong with saying: i don't know, in realisation of not knowing, there's possibility of learning, otherwise you are just beliveing something that you made up.."..i'm parrafrasing..anyway, thanks again.

[@keithnorris6348]

It always puts a smile on my face to hear / see the real scientific world pushing back against the madness of scientium. Great stuff as always Mr Finn and I am looking forward to more thank you.

[@quasimojo7399]

Superb! A Sunday morning treat to wake up to….. REAL science! Thanks to all involved for your efforts.

[@ckatheman]

Nice to see someone point out what has been obvious to me forever - that this whole gravity bending light was just simple optical refraction.

[@saucepanbach]

thanks - excellent presentation laced with humour. Cheers

[@ArchonOne]

Cheers!

[@philosophicaltool5469]

@@ArchonOne love your style and sense of (at times savagely sarcastic) humor! A song on the last album by Faith No More comes to mind, called "The gentle art of making enemies" (which, when taking the rest of the lyrics with a punny mindset, is scarily on point for the content of your presentation too 😂)

[@robhannum]

Thanks for posting!

[@brianmcnish1835]

Thank you!

[@kjharky]

Thanks Matt love your work

[@flightofarrow]

The EU model always beautiful and hopeful

[@velikovskysghost]

@flightofarrow That's one of the things I love about the thunderbolts/EU the extension of hope it gives to all of us in the connection to this electrified plasma universe.

[@jamesdude4220]

great expressions of the known unknown is not knowing anything but experiencing everything

[@protector808]

Another beautiful video! I loved the narration style, plain language, and summarized coverage of all the compelling EU points.

[@ArchonOne]

I’m glad you liked it! Thanks for watching and the nice words

[@georgewesler]

Thanks, Matt. Perfectly explained. We and everything in the Universe are electric entities.

[@philosophicaltool5469]

As one of the Hermetic principles states; "As above, so below"

[@Admiral8Q]

"Gravity" is most likely electro-magnetic.

[@silvergreylion]

@@Admiral8Q Yep. It's due to longitudinal light.

[@richardleigh4003]

Funnily enough everything in the universe is a spiritual entity at its core. The order is: God, spirit, matter. Spirit is s spiritual substance, an emanation from God. Matter is the physical ether, a singular 'field' that creates a kind of dualistic tension between electricity (male direct) and di-electricity (female static). The ether has the property of reacting to spirit, whereas matter is 'dead', reacting to nothing.

[@asiseeit...6915]

My new favorite channel!

[@raycar1165]

Welcome to your Electric Universe Much ❤ Love 🌎🌏🌍☯️⚡️ World🌞Peace

[@Snailmailtrucker]

Welcome aboard @asiseeit...6915 .... we've been waiting for you ! *FJB !*

[@ArchonOne]

This is Matt, the narrator. You just made my day. Welcome aboard and share the message!

[@asiseeit...6915]

@@ArchonOne At 4:15 and 4:45 you have illustrated an interconnected mesh for the aether. Kudos! You have shown that it is dynamic and a non-contact 'structure' that permeates all of "vacuum space", including the "vacuum space" within all matter. Do you agree then that 'mass determination' simply happens because the nucleons in atoms 'displace' or thin out small chunks of the aether? Is it appropriate at this time to conclude that gravity is a push from the entire universe? And that this same 'push' that holds matter together will also do quite nicely to hold the nucleus in atoms together? Are we to the right point with the right team of viewers to discuss such topics??

[@ArchonOne]

@@asiseeit...6915 I know that Wal considered gravity a push not a pull, but I couldn’t grok why.

[@anpier926]

I enjoy those views, they are the path to knowledge. Thank You. I most admit are hard to share with most people

[@GregoryBirulkin]

Chuck missler is the one that directed me to your KZbin channel. Thank you!

[@ArchonOne]

Thanks Chuck, and welcome aboard! I hope you enjoyed it! Spread the word!

[@AdahLael]

I wish this was the theory taught in schools, even if it was taught in parallel with the standard theory. Until that day comes, at least one person is learning this amazing science. Keep teaching us.

[@deborahsloan3224]

Love your expalinations. Fun. Much love and gratitude to you and yours♥🥰

[@ArchonOne]

Thanks Debrah! I love your taste in cosmology. :)

[@ThomasSmith-os4zc]

Thank You.

[@ArchonOne]

You are welcome!

[@MadZax33]

This video is gold. Puts so many scientist life work to shame.

[@velikovskysghost]

@MadZax33 They put their work to shame by not exploring other ideas Matt just helped exposed them.

[@ArchonOne]

Ya I don't want to make fun of anyone, but man we've tried reason. It's not working. Someone needs to point out the Emperor has no clothes. I'm starting to think Big Space is just another dumb government psyop; which is probably why their trolls come here every episode to insult and belittle everyone who watches these shows. @@velikovskysghost

[@Projacked1]

No they absolutely don't HAHAHAHA This is not science, it's religion. Some idiots convince the uneducated.....->yup must be true! Using a lot of fancy words, ...yup must be true, he sounds like a professor! The Thunderbolts Project is not there for YOU. It's there for monetary gains. He 'exposes' without needing to prove it? If this was true, trust me scientists, would revere the project. All science is wrong, yet there isnothing but words LOL. Well, that's easy huh? Also presenting only partly scientific facts, to fit a narrative, keeping YOU in the dark. If science is wrong then look up the data, and then tell yourself it's wrong. You won't because you are too lazy, and watching a Powerpoint video is way easier, right?

[@Admiral8Q]

A real scientist does not 'believe' or go 'fanatic'. A real scientist questions everything.

[@corkygoss7403]

Plasmoids, aye? Malcolm Bendall, anyone? Or Ken Shoulders, or Matsumoto, or Bob Greenyer? Know your EVOs, champs. Much love. Excellent presentation.

[@aperinich]

Love Bob's videos when I get a spare ten hours...

[@nadahere]

🔶A nice summary of where we've been and a portend of where we're going. Great job and thank you everyone 🔶

[@ArchonOne]

Thanks so much. Glad you enjoyed it.

[@brokenmess9921]

Ur awesome Matt. Keep it up

[@ArchonOne]

Thanks! It would be my pleasure.

[@dasraiser]

Fix one end of a string and start winding it up, watch the string fold on itself a few times, then unwind the stepped Z red shift. Great video as always, love the cone solar system, hehe.

[@madincraft4418]

More please. Excellent series

[@ArchonOne]

Thanks. Can’t wait to do another.

[@TheCaywood3]

Thank you

[@ArchonOne]

No thank you for watching.

[@donaldlococo954]

This is simply the best and most informative video I've seen on this channel. Nothing like a good synthesis to blow your mind. Thank you. You've made my day.

[@ArchonOne]

You’re so welcome. Wal Thornhills papers are amazing.

[@velikovskysghost]

At 3:03 Matt says "relativity busted" and I believe it was the late Wallace (Wal) Thornhill who quoted NPA member Don Hotson "everyone who believes in relativity also believes in a direction in which one cannot point"... Time; the first one who sends me a box of seconds, a bag, can or hat full of seconds I will pay them a billion dollars! Time is motion measured nothing more just like Matt says "chronological order of events"... "Black holes" are actually the spaces in between the ears of those who invented them "John Wheeler comes to mind and Wal described the centers of galaxies as "plasmoids" where a concentrated amount of electrical energy becomes a "plasmoid", I have this in an email from Wal, and it makes sense to me. Lastly the idea of the big bang becomes really questionable when one considers the amount of galaxies, 2 trillion known, in this "electrified plasma universe" the late Wallace Thornhill, Dr. C J. Ransom, and James M. Kenyon, and how impossible it would be to stuff all that material, let alone electricity, into nothing! Thanks again Matt for doing such a great job again Wal would be so proud of the work you do!

[@ArchonOne]

Well I hope so and thanks for the comment. It was a joy to read.

[@silvergreylion]

Additionally, according to calculations, the apparent loss of energy from redshifting of light (EM waves) in a cube of 1 billion lightyears on each side, is exactly equal to the force of gravity for the amount of matter contained in that cube. That seems like an awfully big coincidence.. Since we EU theorists assume electrical fields around all cosmological bodies, and we know that the "empty vacuum" of space has permittivity = electric dipoles, those fields polarize "empty vacuum" in a gradient around those bodies, which is equal to those bodies having a gradient of refractive index around them. We also know that a material with a (positive) refractive index bends light when it enters and exits it. Hmm, might one suspect, that this bending of light also causes a stretching of light? That stretching is equal to a loss of energy, but as we know, energy is never "lost". If so, what might that (transverse) light be converted into? Longitudinal light? - hmm, what would the properties of such light be? It would have to be awfully fast, actually about as fast as the propagation speed of gravity.. Hmm, so what if, just if, that other type of light is the cause of gravity? Seems like even mainstream acknowledges, that light can impart a force on matter, an effect known as "Radiation pressure". Nah, couldn't be. That would be too simple, right?

[@benwinter2420]

The plasmoids are nodes black holes heart of darkness that connect galaxies, asked how many rotating & how small the heart of darkness

[@benwinter2420]

Hollow cores of massive Birkeland currents , main arteries in brain

[@abighairyspider]

Yay, Sheldrake. Nice

[@TheyCallMeSir_H]

Great stuff! Keep 'em coming!

[@ArchonOne]

Your wish is my command.

[@attilapalmai1593]

If there is no time, there is no begining nor end... it just that it IS.. no such thing as was or will be... its only a state of things in the 'moment'. Thats how so beautifull it is.

[@maxiglad1624]

There would be no dimension one if there was no time point to start and to become a linear direction just as a spreadsheet might have many dimensions to a cell and the first entry always starts at the beginning.Einsteinium religion puts time over us like a lid but time is the substrate

[@sirgoatofcheese]

I loved it when Wal would make fun of the standard model and I love Matt's snarky tone and comments. If anyone has any doubt about the aether, please read M&M actual lab report. It is exactly as Matt described it.

[@ArchonOne]

Thanks! The funny part is there are so many experiments like this that disprove the standard model. They just ignore them. It’s insane. Such fraud.

[@Dracula-sn3so]

14:21 thanks Matt and everyone else at TP for keeping the dream alive to some day see this beautiful idea become a reality I’m sure Tesla would be thrilled too bad it took so long¥

[@ArchonOne]

Thanks for watching, caring and helping spread the word!

[@scottorgan2255]

Time is a mathematical theory that uses imaginary numbers to explain life the universe and everything

[@poppabearskitchen1769]

The Light of Life by Michael Clarridge posits that we all are vital components in the universe. This video answered my question about how the universe was started, how it is powered. Back down the rabbit hole! Everyone have a safe weekend.

[@ArchonOne]

That video is mind blowing. One of my all time favs.

[@jryer1]

Excellent presentation. Plasmoidism!

[@ArchonOne]

Plasmoidism. Haha.

[@dond668]

Thank you!

[@andrewhall8604]

Beautifully done. Glad you explained the M-M experiment and the drift. Proof of the ether has been right in front of us all along. EU is the only cosmology that actually uses real physics.

[@raycar1165]

Good to see you. I’ve been sculpting my channel into an electric universe glossary and dissident researcher resource. Very cool things happening with anti gravity and material transmutation. Thank you for your inspiration. Much ❤️ Love 🌎🌏🌍☯️⚡️ World🌞Peace

[@EgoPersequorErgoSum]

I define time as “ the application of consciousness upon the unfolding of creation.”

[@ArchonOne]

That is a brilliant line.

[@benwinter2420]

Time has already occurred . . think about your growing body , what has been planned , like an ant

[@ArchonOne]

Ya, I suspect this is some kind of simulation and God is like the dev outside the server who sees the entire thing from start to finish, unaffected by linear time. However this could also be a product of having perfect recollection. A being whose memory is perfect wouldn't have a sense of time. Everything they know, they would know at all times as if it were currently happening I would think.@@benwinter2420

[@TheDemonation13]

this was a good ride ty guys

[@johnselle4018]

I'm going to add a link to this video on my website, designed to hawk my 3-book, fictional series. So much of this one video mirrors what I wrote in the books. Very well done.

[@ArchonOne]

Awesome. We should trade sites. I’ve got my own fiction series coming out too!

[@johnselle4018]

@@ArchonOne Sounds good. Thanks for reaching out and I congratulate you on pushing yourself to write. Getting to the point of publishing your work is a fantastic achievement indeed.

[@chloewinkworthartist]

dipole electro magnetic charge resulting from resonant frequency interactions...

[@benwinter2420]

Heart of negative darkness

[@timothyblazer1749]

I'd recommend looking at Haralick, and his work on decomposing Maxwell's original equations into bi-quaternion form. He shows that there is a scalar field, and that its units are webers/meter^2. The aether may not be physical. It may be a scalar magnetic flux density field.

[@o0kiki0o21]

Bravo! You just mirrored the same hypotheses I have formed. A computer is only as good as the computations and information fed into it. Hard to do when working with incomplete data and knowledge.

[@ArchonOne]

Garbage in. Garbage out. By the truckload.

[@thedarkmoon2341]

I do believe that AI will eventually be better than just the information put into it. We have to make sure though that it is working for all our benefits and not those who presently control it.

[@Snailmailtrucker]

Made my day again Matt... Thanks for the dose of Sanity ! *FJB !*

[@madincraft4418]

It's been an amazing series

[@ArchonOne]

Thank you so much.

[@wordbird711]

Well said.

[@JJ33438]

such great education. thank you for this video.

[@simon2636]

Honest question: How is this "Impossible gravity delay if sun is rocketing around the galactic center" argument different from a flatearther's "impossible not to feel the 1000 miles per hour" argument against a rotating globe - except inverted?

[@pirogronianus]

You are right. But it's a fail done by the narrator, not original author of the idea. They have already partially corrented it.

[@ArchonOne]

Yes that was more my thing. Though call me crazy but I still don’t see how it’s wrong. Please keep in mind I said it wouldn’t do that, because it wouldn’t work at all. But if you start from 0 velocity the sun will have moved up from the ecliptic by the time the first gravity waves reach the planets and begin dragging them. Please understand I don’t believe in gravity waves, so I understand that wouldn’t occur. But in order for relative motion to keep a tight ecliptic, wouldn’t the planets need to already be moving with the sun even though they haven’t received the suns original vector position yet? It seems me that would be putting the cart before the horse, especially when planets are captured rather than being ejected into the system by a gas giant. A captured planet would be pulled toward the source of the gravity wave, not the sun which has already moved on. How am I mistaken?

[@simon2636]

​@@ArchonOne Ok. But thats hypothesizing about what if a star just appear out of nowhere and provoked the movement of nearby planets from 0 velocity - would it be instant or not? Or what if our Sun just suddenly started skyrocketing around the galaxy? We don't know any of that because we found everything already moving with a constant speed. If you tied a ball to a string or a rubber band and started spinning it like a helicopter - you would see the end of the string with the ball being dragged whenever you walked (accelerated) somewhere. But the moment you turn acceleration into constant speed (even if you were running very fast), the spinning ball would stop dragging and spinned the same way as if you stood in place. Isn't it analogous to this skyrocketing around the galaxy?

[@dustinrose361]

In the EU model it is hard to measure how old our infinite universe could possibly be

[@ChristopherWheatley]

In fact as Matt said, EU model makes no claims on age. So then why assume it is "old"? This is falling in to the same trap that we complain about for those not even open to EU theory is it not? We are all often blinded by our own assumptions and do not consider alternatives.

[@ArchonOne]

Ya we don’t pretend to know. Could be brand new for all we know.

[@coneyisland4568]

This was an excellent narration that even a child could understand. And yet, when I try to speak to those I know about this realistic way of looking at the universe, they won't even look at the evidence. Confirmation bias is like a cancer in today's science.

[@silvergreylion]

Yeah, and the After Skool channel has a very on-the-nose video about it.

[@ArchonOne]

One we get that 5 to 10% on board the rest will follow. Keep spreading the word.

[@duotronic6451]

Time is an abstract. That they plug time into equations = deeply corrupt.

[@klikklakis]

At some point in time a wise philosopher said that "we will know everything about physics once we know the structure of the electron".

[@silvergreylion]

I'm actually doing a 3D model of that structure, might be done and putting a short video of it out before April.

[@klikklakis]

Looking forward to seeing it.

[@silvergreylion]

@@klikklakis Small update; I wasted a full week trying to learn Blender, but that program is massively unintuitive, so I'll be drawing the model(s) instead, by hand. I also realized I had to make a video about the ether/aether first, so that's my current task. I created a channel for it: Dual Medium Physics.

[@BreakingphysicsbeyondtheSMOPP]

The Theory of Everything is here and it shows that the electron is a vortex, pushed by its own spin like a propellored engine and is the one and only constituent of matter, what we perceive as "particles":quarks, mesons, heavy bosons etc are electrons caught in manifold loops in the spacetime fabric pulling it in so shapes, neutrinos are ripples in the fabric detected perpendicular to electrons when electrons pass through . It unifies and fixes everything into one quantum field"the spacetime fabric"with one force pressure. Charge is the pull and push of the ether by electrons inside the lattice. It begins by solving the double slit experiment showing that matter always emanates out in spherical waves, the measurement problem is that we can only detect those waves in one dimension giving the illusion of single particles. It consistently annoys big bang Theorists because it destroys the big bang, black holes, time travel even the particle model itself. Big bang space kadet physicists keep trying to remove it from online, most recently the channel with 4 years of work and over 160 videos was closed without any valid reason. It is up again on my new channel "Science not Dogma" with multiple new EXPERIMENTS waiting to be tested and 2 famous mathematical proofs the proof to the Goldbach conjecture and proof a loop is impossible in the Collatz Conjecture solved by me and explained in 3 minutes and 6 minutes respectively for anyone doubting my ability to understand and solve mathematical problems. Watch it while you can and probably best to download the videos in case it's taken down again, the mathematicians who persecuted Aristarchus and Galileo are still around and dislike anyone who opposes the cult of the big bang. on my channel and ToE. Well done to the Thunderbolts Project, you are the closest to the truth by far. I have the absolute truth, simple, intuitive and classical sense made out of the quantum realm.

[@ArchonOne]

This was a good read. Keep up the fight.

[@StephenGoodfellow]

Excellent presentation. As mentioned, space - everywhere in the Universe - is not empty, It follows that there is nowhere you can roll two balls of different mass, where the larger mass does not arrive sooner than the lesser - providing you make the ramp distance long enough to see the effect. This holds true for the vacuum ball and feather experiment, provided the ball and feather are released a significant distance, say 10,000miles, from a gravitational target. We will observe a measured difference in arrival time of the two objects, ball arriving before the feather, as both objects and subject to the interference of space, the lesser mass of the feather will be affected by space to a greater degree, Consequently, our laws of motion are a useful sketch for practical purposes, but at distance, Galilean/Newtonian/Einstinian physics break down over sufficiently longer distances.

[@evawilldrive]

BTW o/ Hi it's me. The words time and weather are interchangeable in some/different languages. There are also cycles and progression.

[@ArchonOne]

I’ve actually heard this. I used the concept in my fiction series for telling time in a world without sun or moon. Protosaturn.

[@mmdurfee]

But in order to know what we don't know, requires us to be open minded and consider the idea without immediately dismissing it if it doesn't fall neatly into an established paradigm.

[@ArchonOne]

Bingo

[@valentinmalinov8424]

Very good statement. Would you consider with open mind the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"?

[@silvergreylion]

@@valentinmalinov8424 Would you consider taking a look at my Dual-Medium Hypothesis/Theory with an open mind? I've just put out revision 0.76 today. It's on the thunderbolts forum under New Insights and Mad Ideas.

[@timothy8426]

This channel is the closest thing to the reality of the observable universe. Magnetism bonding force of pressure known as frequencies of electronic fields grounding or bonding force of unification of unidirectional flow cycling circulation patterns of mass in equalization to pressure throughout space as dark energy outside of entanglement of mass. Renewable energy singularities exchanging points in mass and space itself as a force of magnetism of magnification of force flow cycling circulation patterns as magnetic fields of internal magnetic fields grounding surface mass towards the greater magnetic field. External magnetic fields disrupt internal magnetic fields and don't ground quatum magnetic fields. Mass decays around external magnetic fields. Magnification of frequencies produces better visibility, heat resonating waves, and light amplification. Magnetism bonding or grounding force of pressure known as synchronized flow of pressure known as weight towards the greater magnetic field generators. Occupational space as mass interactions of exchanges of pressure as friction of heat exchanging energy striking mass. Atmospheres act like filaments in stars, atmospheres everywhere. Dark energy outside of entanglement of mass throughout space from stars distance and near pass through space and mass at the cosmic speed limit in resistance until resistance is overcome by open space itself. Distance is reduced by redirected trajectories of singularities passing through mass as entanglement as magnetic fields cycling circulation patterns. Hydrogen has the strongest magnetic field of occupational space as mass as the minimum cycling circulation patterns in distance. Helium occupies more space than hydrogen, and as mass expands, its magnetic field weakens. Less pressure to expand liquidity of illusionary solidity of liquidity cycling circulation patterns. Outward pressure of force is always equalization to distance of traveling through space in atmospheres and space itself. The cosmic speed limit is constant in and out of entanglement of mass. Distance is reduced as equalization to pressure within and without entanglement of mass. The greater occupation of mass has more repulsion within and without in equalization. More outward force of pressure known as weight is more likely to increase impacts than something that has the same size but not the same outward force of pressure known as weight. Impacts of distances according to their outward force of pressure. Force equalization of pressure in equalization to distance of perpetual motion as equalization to pressure within and without mass as equal.

[@MadZax33]

This comment is way too long..

[@ArchonOne]

Wow!

[@fastradioburst253]

Easy for you to say, Tim.

[@Flachickenman]

That is why a bird can fly...light mass and wing flapping force overcomes the magnetic draw of the universe making ether it's comrade. Just the same with butterflies and even planes...stop the inertia, they all fall due to magnatism

[@krislarsen1224]

The qoutes done in an accent crack me up

[@_spacegoat_]

I'm unclear on something. If relativity is "busted", then what explains the time dilation observed with communications satellites? The speed of the onboard clocks has to be adjusted to match clocks on the ground because of the satellites' speed. If this adjustment isn't made, and the clocks are synced only on the ground, GPS location data wanders. Can someone please explain which effect in the EU model accounts for this?

[@yoh6161]

Wait didn't LIGO actually confirmed aether instead gravitational waves? Or am I mixing things up?

[@silvergreylion]

If they actually published the delay between detecting a gravity wave and the burst of EM radiation, it would be far too obvious, that the gravity waves they detect are generated locally, ca. 1.7 seconds or about 508,000 km away, which is the range of the joint electrical field of the Earth-Moon system.

[@yoh6161]

@@silvergreylion So what did they detect? Can you dumb it down for me?

[@silvergreylion]

@@yoh6161 Sure. When an energetic event happens somewhere, it releases a burst of EM radiation. A pulse, if you will, which travels through space at roughly the speed of light in vacuum; c. What we commonly call light, or in general, EM waves, are transverse waves - they swing at a right angle to the direction they travel in. When such a pulse enters the electric field around a cosmological object; a star, a planet, or a moon, a tiny fraction of the energy in that pulse is converted to a longitudinal EM wave, or pulse. It swings in the same direction it travels in. Such a pulse travels at 1.5x10^33 m/s, or about 5x10^24 c, so hits the Earth in a time too short to measure, and the transverse EM pulse, which generated it, arrives ~1.7 seconds later. Longitudinal EM waves are the cause of gravity. They specifically impart a force on the protons in matter.

[@yoh6161]

@@silvergreylion Thank you for the explanation now I understand it.

[@bentuovila5296]

Whats the EU explanation for gravitational wave experiments?

[@michaelstiller2282]

There are videos out there that say the experiment has flaws. Cherry picking the data.

[@ArchonOne]

I’ll bet there’s a paper on them over on holosciece. Wal wrote hundreds of papers on such things.

[@roberthawthorne8396]

Synthetic standards meshed up based on some algorithm. So essentially, a fake pile of poo.

[@DegreesOfThree]

Someone farted in the control room, and they said 'By golly we found one! We're gonna need another hundred million in research funding to be sure though.' 🤷

[@michaelstiller2282]

There is a video where a guy who had worked on the experiment for 20 years was interviewed. When they received a positive strong result. He didn't even believe the results himself. His first thought was the experiment was sabotaged to give a false positive. That someone on the team did it. If you watch him talk about it, you can tell he's not convinced of the results. It took the other team members to convince him to say the test succeeded. But he sounds very skeptical that it did.

[@critical-thought]

You said so many things that are taboo in scholarly circles in one short video. Hats off to you sir!

[@critical-thought]

@@ianw7898 Did anyone say you were allowed to crawl out from under your rock? No. Go away.

[@iyasusholeman4115]

Greetings Matt Can you please reconcile your findings with those of the Tychos Geoaxial Binary Solar System research ??? There are some issues with your findings and that research that don't seem to agree. Thank you

[@cpfeiffer42]

There is a problem with at least one of the arguments made in the video. Right at the beginning, the narrator states that, in 8 minutes (i.e. the time it takes light (and the effects of gravity) to move from the Sun to the Earth), the Sun moves about 110,000 miles. That's just shy of 13% of the Sun's diameter. (Sun's diameter = 864,938 miles). Extrapolating the numbers for Jupiter, the Sun will have moved 591,250 miles away from the point that Jupiter believes the Sun to be gravitationally. That's just over 68% of the Sun's diameter (i.e. not 50 times or 20 times or even 2 times but less than 1 times the diameter of the Sun.) Do you know how small the Sun looks to Jupiter; how wide across the Sun would look to an observer in Jupiter's orbit? The Sun is just over .5° across in the sky here on Earth and Jupiter is 5 times further away from the Sun than we are. Jupiter is 484 million miles from the Sun, if the Sun moves 591250 miles in the time it takes for Jupiter to feel the Sun's gravity then you can do a little math using the Pythagorean Theorem and determine the change in the angle of the Sun's apparent position vs. its actual position relative to Jupiter. www.calculator.net/right-triangle-calculator.html Side a = 591250 (Miles that the Sun travels in the 43 minutes it takes for Jupiter to feel the Sun's gravity.) Side b = 484000000 (Aprox. miles from the Sun to Jupiter) This yields an angle at ∠α of .07° (change in actual position vs. apparent position of the Sun at Jupiter.) A whole whopping .07° of arc. That's 7% of 1 degree of arc! Okay, so the solar system turns out to be a cone that is so flat that you couldn't detect the slope of it's sides if your life depended on it. It seems that no matter how fast the Sun is moving through space, it's no match for the speed of light, which is the speed gravity has been physically measured to travel at. This sort of argument, I think, is the Achilles heel of the Electric Universe Theory. If they want to be taken seriously then they ought not make arguments such as this. They say things like "cone shaped solar system" and that convinces people because the solar system isn't shaped like the dunce cap that the people making the argument should be forced to wear as punishment for having made the argument.

[@cpfeiffer42]

@@ianw7898Saying it doesn’t make it so.

[@silvergreylion]

"the speed gravity has been physically measured to travel at" - no, that is an assumption, based on _one_ gravity wave detection event from the LIGO project. The gravity wave they detect is actually generated locally, as the EM radiation from some energetic event enters the joint electric field of the Earth-Moon system, causing a delay of ca. 1.7 seconds between the gravity wave (which is about 24 orders of magnitude faster), and the burst of EM radiation which generated it. So, every gravity wave detection event will have that same delay, which is why the LIGO project doesn't publish that particular piece of information.

[@pirogronianus]

You are right. But it's a fail done by the narrator, not original author of the idea. They have already partially corrented it.

[@cpfeiffer42]

@@pirogronianus You mean that it was the narrator who took it upon himself to suggest that the solar system would be cone shaped? I very much doubt that is the case and even if it happens to be true, it’s not like the person who narrated the video is some sort of new comer to the EUT and is more or less mindlessly reading copy given to him by the real scientists. In all likelihood, the narrator wrote every word of that script himself. You say that they corrected the error. Can you tell me where that has been done?

[@cpfeiffer42]

@@silvergreylion The measurement of the speed of gravity has exactly nothing at all to do with the LIGO project. Zero, zip, zilch, nada.

[@idealchanful]

The title was a little clicbait, but in fact this video is a must watch

[@philoso377]

When observation disagrees with expectation, there will be no conclusion. Because we don’t know for sure which one is real. In M&M experiment we vote in favor of the expectation (Aether wind) and broke the physics inadvertently.

[@tomahawkskipper8308]

We only detect fast moving neutrinos. I always wondered if there is a whole bunch of slow or stationary neutrinos we can’t detect. Ether?

[@Healitnow]

I have a question. In school, we all remember our teacher setting up a series of steel balls, then taking the end one and pulling it back and letting it hit the next ball. The ones in the middle never moved, but the force is transferred to the one at the other end, making it instantly move away from the rest. It then comes back and repents the procedure. Could energy transfers like this be happening on levels so small we do not recognize them? Could this type of energy transfer account for the quantum moving of information at faster than light speed??? I am not a scientist. This is just a thought.

[@WolfieSmith-j7f]

A conclusion is just where you stopped thinking.

[@Riaining7]

The origin of the electric charge, and the original electric force, is no mystery to me. It's God, and always has been the God of Israel to be more precise. Thanks for this excellently written and explained exposition!

[@stevenborham1584]

Stuck on a point you made here: You implied that light transmission speed would cause gravity to lag and cause the solar system to fall apart. I've not heard the SM state that gravity is transmitted via light and therefore isn't beholden to light velocity limitations. However your later conclusion of space as an eather, therefore instantaneously transmits information as a special density medium to me is a valid one. Gravity is obviously some combination of eather and energy properties by your definitions. P.S. I am not a science guy, just keen to understand.

[@silvergreylion]

You are welcome to ask me. I've put my Dual-Medium Hypothesis up on the thunderbolts forum, but I'll answer as plainly as possible too.

[@mrtailor2010]

Amazing. Thank you for the exciting and eloquent narrative. Thoroughly enjoyed it.

[@jeffr3773]

I'm on your side, but can you please start posting sources to the claims made in videos? A lot of this stuff is surprising because it's hidden from us by academia and I'd like to learn more about each point. For example the interconnectedness of neutrinos

[@valentinmalinov8424]

I am not sure about the "Interconnectedness of neutrinos" because there is no scientific instrument able to study them. Probably you can learn more from the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

[@silvergreylion]

@@valentinmalinov8424 Can you give a brief summary of what the theory in that book is based on?

[@TheAnarchitek]

I've long wondered why our traditional history fizzles out sometime before about 5,000 years ago. The Egyptians and the Sumerians rise out of the darkness around that time, although the Sphinx may predate them. The story gets chaotic, pretty quick, and things seem to change, from century to century, down the long dark ages of ancient history, until about 2,750 years ago, when civilization picked up, again.

[@PaulMarostica]

Matt: I thought the measured speed of all neutrinos was approximately the speed of light. You seem to be suggesting instead that neutrinos form a lattice. What is actually measured?

[@ArchonOne]

I’m not sure. Wal described them as a lattice. I’m just narrating his papers and trying to make them a little more accessible to the average Joe. But he does say that ever square centimeter is teeming with them. If they are in motion or stationary I can’t say, though it seems motion is the trend?

[@PaulMarostica]

@@ArchonOne Okay. Thank you. Maybe you should say every cubic cm instead of every square cm.

[@ArchonOne]

@@PaulMarostica good point

[@thenikso]

Lately I've discovered "energy wave theory" that, among other things, explains what could be the nature of the electric force. I think you'd find it interesting!

[@lando9238]

This is like listening to a flat earth video… the earth is traveling around the galaxy along with the sun dip$hit

[@pirogronianus]

You are right. But it's a fail done by the narrator, not original author of the idea. They have already partially corrented it.

[@arcmode]

Is the aether only made of neutrinos? I wonder about Mendeleev two extra species before hydrogen, what could be the other one?

[@dantheman9135]

Much appreciated Crush on....

[@DANTHETUBEMAN]

Great video on some basic truth's. 😊

[@jdehaan001]

What an excellent, riveting presentation! Thank you! I forwarded the link to many friends and family.

[@mdarbygr]

I love people who are not embarrassed to criticize the consensus even though they know they will be dismissed by the popular kids.

[@Admiral8Q]

😆 Yes.

[@7ebr830]

Time dilation effect (tde) has been observed. Clocks on GPS satellites require adjustment for tde. Not that easy to dismiss Einstein.

[@silvergreylion]

It's because it was never considered, that all processes could slow down at higher velocity, instead of time itself.

[@gw7157]

Ever try to give a load baring cable on a bridge a "quick whip" there's no sag to whip. If you touch it it's going to be felt instantly like a spider web. I understand the analogy but the rope whip or pull is a bad one. It's more like a spider web telling the spider a bug is caught.

[@benwinter2420]

Hope James Kenyon in good health

[@carlwest5671]

What has no beginning has no end.

[@richardleigh4003]

It's all very beautiful to have these models, cosmological constructions and super-microscopic adventures, but remember: No one ever saw a star or a galaxy or a neutrino or a gravity wave. Such things are outside the purview of real science since they have no observer base. Instead they have a grand build up of opinion that gets so heavy that people mistakenly believe that that is the weight of truth.

[@sunroad7228]

"Externally-powered rather than self-held"; "In any system of energy, Control is what consumes energy the most. No energy store holds enough energy to extract an amount of energy equal to the total energy it stores. No system of energy can deliver sum useful energy in excess of the total energy put into constructing it. This universal truth applies to all systems. Energy, like time, flows from past to future"(2017).

[@maxiglad1624]

I postulate that the neutrino field has a ‘thickness’ and as such it becomes a lense and over very long distance things appear even further than they are. Not andromeda but further out the gradual distortion. If we can calculate that ‘thickness’ we would be able to move light years in our knowledge of the cosmos

[@aperinich]

At the end of Thunderbolts Proj. videos, I still expect to hear that baroque ditty which used to be the closing music. I'm thankful it's gone, as it was irritating... but on the other hand, it reminds me of the part used in "As Good As New" by ABBA, who I love dearly. So I'm torn. The new closing music is a bit of a nothing burger.

[@pirogronianus]

I'm persnally involved in EU for years, but around 1:00 there is something oversimplified or just false. Sun's orbit around galactic center seems to be so big, that its motion, for some relatively large period of time, can be viewed as linear (author clearly means that). And linear motion is relative, it's equivalent of stationary state (unless we have implicit introduction of absolute motion concept). Sun isn't pulling planets around galaxy with its gravity, the galaxy itself does it.

[@ryandarger2755]

Awesome video. I agree with everything except the neutrinos. The aether is an incommensurable fluid made up of aether itself, not of particles. It is the only true fluid. There is nothing smaller than a proton. An electron is a wave or perturbation of the aether, not a particle. I hope this helps.

[@WorksopGimp]

I keep asking the same question if light is both a particle and a wave at the same time what is the wave travelling through, I get called a flat earther or worse

[@evawilldrive]

Do they ever show anything else = another astronomical body/phenomena going into = merging with the central plasmoid = Sagittarius A?

[@quantumcomata105]

It's Meowgical! 🐈 🪄