Maududi on Jinnah

What did Islamic political parties in pre-partition India say about Jinnah, Muslim League, and Pakistan? You may be shocked to discover that the vast majority of religious parties and leaders in pre-partition India were totally opposed to the Muslim League and Jinnah. Maududi, in particular, was the most vicious against Pakistan and Jinnah. His principal criticism was that Jinnah knows nothing about Islam, understands Islam only through a secular lens, and is actually creating a secular state. Listen and be amazed :)
For references please see:
chagataikhan.bl...

[@shahidmahmood5309]

From research I also found that MAOLANA was against muslim league. The reason is that literally Muslim league was not an islamic party. Its struggle was based on nationalism .That's reality u r right.

[@Alburr250]

Also that many of them were feudal land lords and aristocrats. Most educated in the UK.

[@whiteholeeducationcenter]

Nationalism on what nationalism. Sindhi, Punjabi?

[@attaurrehman2818]

Struggle begins with 2 nation theory .... Hindu-Muslim distinction....then it become the idiology of Pakistan...so how can you say that the struggle was not on Muslim base?

[@waqarali7]

he was right.

[@usamasaleh351]

You always feel pain because, Maudidi defeated red revolution with his movement

[@Taimur_Laal]

Usama Saleh Maududi didn’t. USA did.

[@lalasehraye1]

@@Taimur_Laal You can feel more now.

[@challengeworld8559]

@@lalasehraye1 Digesting truth is next to impossible for JI and its blind followers

[@lalasehraye1]

@@challengeworld8559 You know what, You should do the survey on all his comments on this video and you will get the outcome that what kind of credibility Taimoor Rehman has. No proof,

[@talhagaming7204]

kaisa diya nah diya acha Laal ny

[@ops176]

Words may get bitter, but practically molana was right, and today we can see this practically, opinion may differ but it must be accepted that molana forcasted it, As a suggestion instead of sharing con's try to share pros as well, so listners can get balanced approach. Another suggestion, try to read his books like khilafat o malokiat,. Shahadat e haq, and many more. Respect !

[@EngineerMuhammadAsif]

"اسلام اور سیاسی کشمکش" کو پڑھیں۔ یہ باتیں [جو بیان کی گئی ہیں] مولانا مودودی کی ہیں ہی نہیں۔

[@syedabishosainrizvi7817]

certainly India is a safe haven for muslims, isn't it? Our favourite secular utopia where muslims are not persecuted for being muslim

[@simple6138]

There is no contradiction between secularism and Islam. Original version of Islam accommodates every human with open heart. This is what I have extracted through original teachings; I might be wrong.

[@arslananwar6155]

And what about those secular communists who were also against the creation of Pakistan? (Bacha Khan and Wali Khan),you as a communist support them

[@Taimur_Laal]

Arslan Anwar Bacha Khan and Wali Khan were not communists but nationalists. Communists supported them in the struggle against “One Unit” and Ayub’s dictatorship. But on Pakistan CPI has a different position.

[@MrSalahshamsi]

Yes, the tongues of these ignorants get paralysis, to speak the truth but the whole trurh, nothing except the truth. Secondly, Maulana Maududi's opinion before creation of pakistan about Muslim League and opportunists who were flocking to ML was real doubt, those who have no knowledge and concept of Islam and Ialamic regime, how they are going to eatablish Islamic law in a new State. Time proved his suspicion was right. After 73 years, we are still waiting to see our dream to come true. Thirdly, Syed Maududi not only migraded to Pakistan but all his life struggled to see the destined Islamic State of pakistan.

[@mr.teachsmart2377]

FIRST you have to study about them, they are the real heroes for muslims, they don't want to dissect the muslim unity where they governed for decades And bacha khan is a staunch supporter of muslim unity rather to aloof them as Quid did

[@majeedullahkhan8634]

Taimur Bhai.. I am doubtful about the "style of writing you read". If possible share its pdf version so that we can confirm it from Mansora. Hope You will cooperate.

[@naeembakkhar9788]

He will never cooperate because he is a decided liar

[@shaoorehsan9114]

@@naeembakkhar9788 like you a JI and modudi andh bhakt without thinking mindset.

[@abdullahtariq8639]

I appreciate your work Mr. Taimur, i really do. But tbh my grandfather has spent time with Maulana Maududi, he knew him personally i mean my grandfather really admired the guy because he helped my grandfather find faith again, my grandfather's a former Marxist himself. He said Maududi Sahb was pro Pakistan, i mean let's actually ask people from the people who actually know the guy instead of the internet. No disrespect towards ur work tho. Thank you

[@aunthegeek5788]

Well I'm sorry to say but your grandfather was lying because that's wrong on so many levels and in accordance to his own published works. Ignorant to say the least.

[@SaleemAhmad-pp5gh]

Moulana Modidi how responded to Pakistan ,shows in his books and which could not be erased .pl do not masukh tareekh

[@deltaop1reload]

Before penning this misleading comment, did you even care to read what Maududi says about Pakistan in his own books?

[@SaleemAhmad-pp5gh]

Hassaan M Jamaat Islami has tried his very best to hide those comments in his books about Pakistan and Qaid Azaz. Pl read his book Muslman aur Siasi kasmakash. Further Moulana Moududi has not participated in any activity In support of Pakistan before 1947,with Muslim league or Without Muslim league. After Pakistan created Moududi sahib suddenly came out from his isolation and mukhalfat ,raced and jumped in Pakistan and self acclaimed that now Pakistan created so We will give Pakistan tha way ahead agendas. Koshish aur Struggle Muslim league and Quad Azam na ke thee Pakistan bananey ka liyaa.moulanaa beath ker Tamasha dekhtay rahaa. Aur jub Pakistan Ben gayaaa tu Halwaa khanay juldi sa aa ghay 😳

[@artistscientist2848]

@Yasir Arif How many times does the word 'Islam' or the word "Madina' or the word 'Muslims' occur in Jinnah's speech on the 11th of August? Why is there no actual recording existing now? Is it remotely possible that you might be biased yourself? Out of the need to justify present day Pakistan from the lens of Jinnah? No intention of pissing you off, just trying to present a perspective different from that one that is firmly entrenched in your brain. Bro, it is alright if things in the past weren't the way you want them to be. Jinnah did NOT give a fuck about Muslims that were going to be left in India. Even if he did, he had no plans whatsoever for them. Maulana Ahmad Madani of Deoband had pointed this out quite strongly. Do you think by putting 1/3rd of the population of the country in the devil's lair and saving their own asses, Jinnah and company did great service to Islam? Matlab, agar 3 bhai jungle mein khud ko darinde ke saamne paaye, toh do ne ek ko nicha gira ke bhaagle, taake darinda unko maarne mein busy ho jaaye, aur baaki ke 2 nikal le. What happened, happened. You can't change that. But when you start defending what happened is when questions will be raised on your Iman. Is this what Islam teaches?

[@saleemuddka]

All misquoted reference , Facts are: 1. The only book 'Two Nation Theory' use by Muslim league in Independent struggle was written by M. Maududi. 2. Maulana Maududi was assigned to give lectures on Radio Pakistan for Islamic Government by Quaid-e-Azam. 3. Allama Iqbal has referred Maulana Maududi for muslim spiritual future and asked to come to Punjab from Hyderabad. 4. In the Shaitani world any group struggle to for right ideology will be opposed. 5. There was a bigger picture for muslims as a large population will remain in India; and there are many points which shows that your analysis is wrong.

[@muhammadhassanahmad5002]

ye baat sach hai lkn baat pak bannay k baad ki hai quaideazam pak banana chahtay thay is liye two nation theory ki support lazmi thi

[@SaleemAhmad-pp5gh]

Pl do not masukh tareekh aur Modidi sahib ke kitaboon jo likhaaaa ha sub Pakistan ka khilaaf ha,app bhee kisee book ka ref den .

[@princehamza890]

But he was against Pakistan because he believed jinnah is secular. & what bigger picture? Without پاکستان it would be slavery & humiliation for Muslims.

[@intikhabalam1416]

Wow just read my comment. Believe me I've mentioned all this without reading Ur comment which means this d real truth and professor taimoor is misleading people

[@shammo2225]

I was born in Pakistan. I have completed my graduation in Pakistan. Mr jinnah was my hero and I admired him a lot. Few years back I came to USA and I studied more history about tahreek e Pakistan and their leaders. After studying history, I realized that Mr jinnah was good politician , but he wasn’t that good. The partition of subcontinent was planned by England. They had too many reasons for that . Amir of Afghanistan, Amir abdur rehman khan wrote a book named “ taaj ul tawa’reekh” According to him, british were planning to divide subcontinent in to two parts. This book was written 47 years before the independence of Pakistan. How he knew it ?

[@whiteholeeducationcenter]

Unfortunate, Pakistan is a fake state. It's full of corruption. Pls pray for us. Pray for reunification of lndian subcontinent

[@janbhatti7259]

Your references are incomplete, please elaborate these references , I didn't find one of these quotations correctly. I'm waiting for your reply Sir

[@fadingtraditionsandculture4278]

you shud read modudi's book Musalmaan aur mojooda siyaasi kashmakash

[@janbhatti7259]

@@fadingtraditionsandculture4278 plz highlight those references

[@fadingtraditionsandculture4278]

@@janbhatti7259 Read the whole book. It is abt movement of Pakistan

[@janbhatti7259]

Can i find those stuff which has been stated in the video

[@fadingtraditionsandculture4278]

@@janbhatti7259 yes, 95 %

[@acrobat6217]

I am not a Jamaat guy nor do I appreciate Maududi. However, he was right, that in the Muslim League, people were not at all Muslim in their personal characteristics and were in fact non-Muslims. The entire party was a creation of wealthy landlords and businessmen who were absolutely westernized in nature(Aga Khan/Jinnah). Grassroot activism was very low as compared to the Congress party. This is the reason why there is a class conflict in Pakistan even today.

[@mumtaz4327]

Absolutely correct brother This is the reason of Pakistan's backwardness even today As Pakistan is in the clutches of those elite class and army generals at times

[@magma9000]

Funny story my uncle when he was living in Pakistan he was liberal when he went to south Africa and UK he become a very conservative Muslim

[@fatimarana7880]

I want to highlight three points, 1)Yes, some religious parties and their leaders opposed partition and Jinnah. It was not only Ulama but also many non-Ulama/mainstream Muslim leaders who opposed Jinnah and partition. Why are we only targeting Ulama ? What does Ulama's opposition prove ? Opinions of parties, individuals and groups are based on their analysis of situation, which can prove wrong or inappropriate. It happens quite often in our own lives as individuals. We have seen many political parties in Pakistan or elsewhere who have committed mistakes/blunders and many of them accept it. What is wrong in it :) 2)You are also missing the point that there were religious parties and many ulama/mashaikh who supported Pakistan like Shabir Ahmed Usmani, Azad Subhani, Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi, MufitShafi, Maulaha Muhammad Ibrahim Sialkoti, Pir Ghulam Mujaddid Sirhindi, Amin-ul-Hasnant Pir Sahib of Manki Sharif, Pir Sahib Zakori Sharif, Pir Jamat Ali Shah, Maulana Sanaullah Amritsari. 3) Your quote from Ali Usman Qasmi's book re Tafhimul Quran is absolutely incorrect. It is not in the book of Mr Qasmi. It creates doubts about your other references as well.

[@lillyaslam9296]

Thank youu ms nida to mention my forefather moana Ibrahim sualkoi.he fully sported the Pakistan movement under the quad e azam leadership.

[@khalilullah3032]

Hazrat Mujadid Alf Sani “If Muslims want to live like a live nation then they will have to get rid of all those paganism. They will have to live separately from Hindus. If this consciousness of separate nationalism is not produced among the Muslims then the fear is that they would be swept away in the flood of one-nationhood.”

[@mdsaifurrahman9462]

Maulana Maududi was a fascist when he ordered his party in 1971 to form paramilitary to support Pakistan Army in East Pakistan just to grab power and his people committed genocide in the name of Islam. This clearly showed his real character, he was worse than any other political leaders in Paksitan.

[@AliHassan-uw5in]

in this hard world, some things are pretty harder. for instance, understanding the mindset of people call themselves researchers and "the prudent", but unable to pick the difference between "tarjuman ul quran" and "tafheem ul Quran". some people are deliberate liers, well so-called "the wise". There is a big difference between truth and propaganda and you are a propagandist. people who have read Maulana Maududi can understand the language of Maulana, and most of your excerpts are utterly not of Maulana. there can be ideological differences with any movement, surely he had.

[@kashmirispakistan]

IKR If you're going to slander under the pretence of research, at least put some effort into it. One has to be extremely biased or hopelessly gullible to take this guy seriously.

[@AssadAli7]

@@kashmirispakistan I second you both..only gullible and naive are going to believe this liar..جھوٹ کا کوئی سر پیر نہیں ہوتا ۔۔

[@EngineerMuhammadAsif]

No doubt

[@jisooskywalker4022]

You people don't have any evidence of your own so just going around hurling insults. Sorry if your spiritual grandfather was not the man you think he is 😂

[@tazeenhasan]

ترجمان القرآن کتاب نہیں۔ یہ لینگویج مولانا مودودی کی نہیں۔ جلد پندرہ کس کتاب کی ہے?? پورا ریفرینس دیں

[@AssadAli7]

Jhoot ka koe sir paon hota hai bhala? Jahilon ne Esa he batain aur jhoot gharna hota hai bhai..

[@princehamza890]

@@AssadAli7 tumhara modudi jhoota hy

[@Zeeshan2609]

Reference aur video se related material hamesha video ke DESCRIPTION mei mil jata. Waha mulahiza kijye shaayd apko apke sawal ka jawab mil jaye.🙂

[@waqarali7]

کیا کیا پوچھیں جناب سے ۔ تفہیم القرآن میں جناح پر تنقید ، بھائی تیمور کچھ تو عقل کی بات کریں۔

[@waqarali7]

@@Zeeshan2609 ویڈیو میں جلد 13 کہہ رہے اور ویڈیو کی ڈیسکپریشن میں 31 لکھا ہوا ہے ۔ اگر تیمور نے سنجیدہ تنقید کرنی ہوتی تو ان مضامین پر مبنی کتاب تحریک آزادی ہند اور مسلمان کی دو جلدوں کی کتاب سے حوالے دیتے ۔ یہ محض ایک سوشلسٹ کا غصہ اور فرسٹریشن لگ رہی ہے ۔ مودودی نے سوشلزم کو پاکستان میں شکست دی ، بس اسی کا غصہ ہے ۔

[@danialkhalid3430]

برائے مہربانی مولانا مودودی کی جس کتاب کا آپ نے حوالہ دیا اس کا نام اور جس نے ترجمہ کیا اس کا نام بھی بتا دیں۔ ساتھ ہی یہ بھی بتا دیں کہ جب کیا آپ کو اردو میں کتاب نہیں ملی جو آپ اس کا ترجمہ پڑھنے پر مجبور ہوئے۔

[@w.k8624]

I agree with Maududi. Pakistan was and is a confused state which cannot decide between east and west. It mostly went with the western style thinking with flirting sometimes with eastern thoughts. A confused nation.

[@mdsaifurrahman9462]

Maududi was more confused than this nation.

[@Alburr250]

Exactly!!

[@princehamza890]

@@mdsaifurrahman9462 😀😀😀😀

[@princehamza890]

Divided bot confused.

[@princehamza890]

Divided not confused

[@misbah-ul-haq4175]

this is a great description by you. Thank you so much for this explanation.

[@syedafaq110]

Sir, is there anything in the fanatical account of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind? Did they eventually change their stance towards Jinnah's secular viewpoints?

[@rohailkhan4826]

To Pakistan ma Islamic republic honay par minorities ko rights nahi diye jatay kya? Aur agar koi masla hai bhi liberals ke mutabiq to secular ban ne ke baad wo problems kesay khatam hojyengi?

[@aussie.clippa]

Can you share the links maududis statements which read over here

[@mdsaifurrahman9462]

These references are widely available on the net.

[@Taimur_Laal]

chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2011/01/mawdudi-jamat-e-islami-deobandis-had.html

[@mghazalikhan1663]

@@Taimur_Laal ٖFew years ago a friend sent me Masawat's article as well as the pamphlet posted by you. Like everyone who has read Tafheemul Qur'an and other writings of Maulana Moudoodi I was shocked and contacted another friend, a 'khandani Jamati' and son of one of the founding members of Jamat. He said I wouldn't comment on it. I want you to come to my house next weekend and see for yourself the copies of Tarjuman ul Qur'an referred to by Masawqt, PPP's mouth organ. I went to his house and checked each and every issue referred here and found out that all of these so-called quotations were brazen connections. I do not have the copies of Tarjumanul Qur'an but in this clip this gentleman, in response to another clip of yours, shows the images of these issues. Please have a look and please act and behave like an academic that you claim to be. kzbin.info/www/bejne/r6fJiXSObMmIpM0

[@hunainalikhan9253]

It's true that most of the members of the Muslim League were not practicing Muslims, but they used Islam in their political campaign to advocate for the formation of Pakistan. Hence, the creation of Pakistan was truly based on religious terms, rather than in a secular sense. This is why Muslims from different backgrounds, whether Punjabi, Sindhi, Bengali, or Urdu speaking, were able to unite because of the religious ideology introduced by the Muslim League

[@3b7pa]

Doctor is trying to crack people's unity.

[@synhope3746]

Maulana Azad was not kattar. Many liberal Muslims also opposed the division of Muslims into three parts.

[@muhammadmuneebkhan1315]

They were right

[@usmansiddiqui4217]

Azad was a very traditionalist mullah who believed that India was dar ul harb and urged indian muslims to migrate to afghanistan

[@ehsonhussain4488]

Dear sir, I'm not sure how you derived that Jamiat Ulma e (not ahle) Hind was supportive of pan islamism. Their whole struggle and coalition with congress was on the basis of nationalism. Please revisit your theory

[@knowaboutindia]

Love from India 🇮🇳 If Jinnah was secular why he demanded separate Pakistan state?

[@Taimur_Laal]

Because he argued Congress was not a truly secular party but a Hindu party.

[@knowaboutindia]

@@Taimur_Laal yes I also read in our text book same argument. In Congress party many leaders are affectionate to soft hindutva. But in my opinion Nehru was true secular person. But I have hesitancy to consider mr. Jinnah as secular. By the way it is debatable topic.

[@singhparihar8530]

@@knowaboutindia kaha se ho bhai mere ko lagta tha ab aise log india me ni milte

[@knowaboutindia]

@@singhparihar8530 I'm from Allahabad . India bahut diverse country hai bahut Sare opinion h ek hi issue pr bahut Sare logon ke Bhai

[@yog-sadhna3415]

@ABC this is a lie, indira never said it

[@adeebrazzaque276]

Secularism in means right to practice religion We have our own legal social and judicial law that why we are protecting secularism but in case of Pakistan 99%muslim why do need secularism To misguide people from islam☪️️

[@mubashirahmad2104]

this language isnt Maududi lnaguage,dont be stupid ,internet isnt the reference ,show the actual journal which you have refereed.

[@Taimur_Laal]

chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2011/01/mawdudi-jamat-e-islami-deobandis-had.html

[@musfira5465]

@@Taimur_Laal جھوٹے انسان. مساوات اخبار جماعت اسلامی کا نہیں ہے.. شرم نہیں آتی اتنا بڑا بہتان لگاتے ہوِئے. ہمت ہے تو ترجمان رسالے کے ثبوت دو.. اللہ آپ کو ہدایت دے آمین.

[@faisalzaman6639]

@@Taimur_Laal sir this paper is farcical. U have got it terribly wrong. A scholar of ur caliber must be having books. And let me give u a hint. Whenever u see obnoxious language, rest assured that Maududi was never there..

[@VoiceofMaududi]

All fake and baseless allegations without reference. I thought you might present some intellectual things but I really disappointed.

[@widdalightsout]

why don't you bring your references and explain your view of reality ? Put some effort into explaining your opinion instead of being a troll here because I don't think anyone really cares what you think.

[@VoiceofMaududi]

Reference is responsibility of the person who put allegations but there is no evidence shown in the video, only speaking isn't enough.

[@usmansiddiqui4217]

@@VoiceofMaududi if you follow maududi than you should get a time machine and go back to 7th century. Then you can practice what maududi writes in his book

[@AllamaMashriqi]

1947 - Assembly of 300,000 Khaksars in Delhi to Overturn British Rule When Allama Mashriqi called for 300,000 Khaksars to assemble in Delhi on June 30, 1947, the Government not only fast-forwarded transfer of power, but also imposed section 144 in Delhi and formed police pickets on all entries into Delhi. There were standing orders to arrest the Khaksars entering Delhi. According to the Khaksar circle, the overthrow of British rule was around the corner, but Muslim and Hindu leaders were directed to accept the partition of India before June 30th (which they did). These leaders ruined the pride of the Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs and others for not conquering the Indian sub-continent’s (now Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh) freedom. Pursuing a transfer of power also speaks loudly to the fact that these leaders did not have power in the streets.

[@zainullahkhan3574]

sir pir maulana shaber ahmad usmani ne kis bena pe Quaid e azam ka sat diya,kia wo be secular state ke hame te?sir please guide me

[@bxukuab583]

I bet most of the jamati followers dont even know about this.

[@Alburr250]

They don’t

[@rasikhhassan1997]

Or bhai shb jhoot ky be paon hoty hen koi banda apsy pochy ky jis katab ka name he "tarjamanul Quran" hu us katab mn tarjamy ky ilawa or kia hu skta hay?

[@waseemrasool1235]

Most of the statements he has taken are out of the context. This is very unfortunate that he has actually misquoted and misinterpreted Maududi and tried to misrepresent him.

[@shafqatlone8736]

Maudodi is nothing only extremist narcissistic

[@NoobMaster-jq6gb]

Lol he got his source printed for you... You can literally found everything on internet

[@HamzaKhan-ue7ii]

Maulan maududi justified the creation of Pakistan in accordance with the Quran and Sunnah in his book "Musalman aur maujuda siyasi qashmakash". The muslim league couldnt bring any justification for the creation of pakistan except a national argument. It was naulana maududi who justified pakistans creation in accordance with islam.

[@nazarrather5800]

Thus, as per your argument, Jinnah wished Pakistan to be a welfare state as some European State may have been, all encompassing, pluralistic. And obviously, Maududi sought it to be on the pattern of Madinah, in his perception, theodemocratic and religious oriented. Of course in either of the cases, there was a search for betterment on behalf of the propounders. But neither Jinnah nor Maududi got what they wished it to be bcoz the masses whom they addressed have yet (even after 70 years of self-rule) to prove their collective civilized character.

[@nazarrather5800]

@maarij hassan Asalam-u-Alikum Brother I have a reservation pertaining to this very post. In it you have tried to portray Jamaat Islami as an anti- social, thus anti- Pakistan, organisation which, according to me, is not based on reality. Even being a critique of Jamaat, I confess that Maududi's and Jamaat's stand on creation of Pakistan is often misquoted. What Maududi resisted was creation of a state in the name of Islam without the necessary preparations to practice Islam. Because according to him if a state in the name of islam remained unable to demonstrate Islam, in any sphere of life, it will malign Islam worldwide. So, Muslims need to have Makkan period of preparation before establishing the state of Madina. It is why Maududi remained away from Muslim league bcoz,for him, they seeked Madina without disciplining them selves at Makka. And what Maududi had predicted, proved 100% right for last 70 years. Allah gave us this state but it is yet to act as model for the world. We still have feudal lords and parasites like shareefs and Zardaris ruling Madinah thani, mamlikati khudadaad. Maududi cherished an islamic state were people would be conscious and God fearing who would have never tolerated such corrupt rulers and bureaucracy.... ....So, I think we need to rise up from the hatred, eventhough keeping our genuine differences, and think holistically. Hope you will take my point with an optimistic sense. May Allah s.w.t help the Captain at Pakistan to stabilize Pakistan and convert it into actual Madinatu thani. Aameen. Thank you .. and love you very much.. your brother from Srinagar.

[@mdsaifurrahman9462]

What Jinnah wanted Pakistan to be a modern welfare state like some EU countries are achievable and is more closer to the city state like Madina but what Maududi wanted was a nightmare, a fascist state in the name of Islam.

[@mdsaifurrahman9462]

@@nazarrather5800 What happened after all those so called preparation by the greatest man in this world, the holy prophet pbuh? Except first caliph all caliphs were killed by muslim themselves and the Madina state turned into ashes! So what did Maudidi wanted, he was not even a prophet guided by Allah.

[@renedescartes7540]

There is no doubt that Jinnah was a Secular person just like Ataturk but the generations who came after him baptized his political legacy in the name of Islam.

[@vinsin328]

How Jinnah was secular? Tell one secular laws that he proposed after Pakistan creation.

[@whiteholeeducationcenter]

@@saadzaidi2202 Well definitely he had talked about Pakistan and it's system in his speeches. He had given many speeches

[@gringo5866279]

I like Mustafa Kemal quite and Jinnah himself appreciated him there is no any thing to be objected hated about it

[@TheGheezoinky]

Thank you for imparting knowledge to all those who couldn't get admission to LUMS ;) Keep fighting the good fight, Sir.

[@hkoreja]

Momin Shoaib exactly 😊

[@harismirbaggu5837]

Huhh, which good fight. Dear! All refrences quoted by him are FALSE and FAKE. Tell him to show thess refrences from original book highlighting exact words.

[@mohdyousufkhan5193]

Momin Shoaib lanatulaahi allal kazibeen the person is international liar there is no more like Mudadi sahab a great scholar

[@aajkalkehalaat635]

are ankhain kholo internet per sary kitab milin gain parh kar dekho kia jhoot hy kia sach he ye mazkoorah shakhas khud modudi sahib se nawaqif hay is ky andr men koi chuppa bugz hay jo nikal raha hay tum tu in ke hosh sanbalo

[@shakeelurrahman1846]

@معارج حسن بھائی جو دعویٰ کرتا ہے دلیل اس کو پیش کرنی چاہیے. آپ مولانا کی کتاب تحریک آزادئ ہند اور مسلمان پڑھیں

[@Alburr250]

If you think Taimur Rahman is ignorant, I hate to break your bubble but he is very well read and very educated on various subjects ranging from history, politics, social sciences. He is a rarity in a country where a large number of people don’t read nor think out of the box. Your works are very educational Taimur and keep up the good work.

[@gringo5866279]

👍🏼

[@meharshah7276]

State policy of every country should be secular , personal life of Pakistani Muslims should be religious but it should be chosen by that person itself.

[@gringo5866279]

Another thing is the state foriegn policy complete indepedent unbaised to some extant neutral with being devised under the premises of national interests rather than an aggressive one sided narrow minded and serving the interests of an elite class & pressure groups

[@nowie4007]

I agree,this is the only way to reduce extremist elements in our society and to protect minority rights as well

[@HamzaKhan-ue7ii]

But islam is a DEEN not just a religion. The Quran is not just a book of theology it is also a book of jurisprudence and governance. In islam anyone is free to have which ever theological belifes they want but the DEEN will be islam and not democracy, comunism, facism, capitalism, socialism etc

[@saman866]

2 qomi nazaray per mulana nay book likhe the is ka name masla e qomit hy.indai may muslim leaug nay wo book logo may taksem ki takay logo ko do qomi nazariya samaj aa sakay.

[@lockdown4448]

Aaj ki Surte hal kay Mutabik batien Bilkul sahi han.. Fark sirf ye hay kay Moududi sab ki nhe han. ✋

[@joezweb]

Maulana Maududi's (R.A) last words which he wrote on a paper (because he couldn't speak properly ) were " I am a Muslim and I am a Pakistani ".... Also he supported Fatima Jinnah. I haven't cross checked your references so I'm believing you are right. But it is possible that he may had changed his view...

[@shohelshohel5366]

If moulana moudodui told that corrects

[@MAhmad-xt7rk]

Yes you are right he changed his views after come to this country

[@gringo5866279]

Because now he was in his quest for power and ranks he could find in Pakistan

[@rashidzaidi5211]

Beautiful, Maududi sahib was a great religious scholar and an intellectual person. The likes of Dr. Israr Ahmad learnt from him. His house I remember on Ferozepore Road was a center of learning. He had a large following. Getting back to your point I think you are so right the creators were secular or beyond. To learn to tolerate others you have to have multicultural societies/ countries. It’s cannot be monolithic. That is why most western countries put it into law. We need to educate that will emancipate us from the drudgery. Thank you great to find your channel

[@AneelKumar-h4z]

Sir please suggest best book regarding Pakistan and India history

[@lockdown4448]

Jothoon par Allah ki Lannat.. Sir Moududi sab kay about jo batien is ne ki Apko Moududi sab ki kisi book me milen to muje lazmi btaiega.. I Challenge Everyone...

[@worldachiever4198]

Aoa sir me css ki aspirant hu please ap muje suggest kre kuch books muje b ap ki trah intellectual bnana hy

[@syedkash4u]

آپ مسئلہ قومیت پر جمیعت علمائے ہند کے موقف سے آگاہ نہیں ہیں۔ اس حوالے سے آپ کو چاہئے کہ مولانا مدنی اور ابوالکلام آزاد کے موقف کو پڑھیں۔ ان دونوں نے مسئلہ قومیت پر جو بات پیش کی تھی، آپ اس سے بالکل مختلف بات کررہے ہیں۔ آپکو پڑھنا چاہئے۔ مولانا مدنی کے خیال میں مسلم قومیت کا کوئی وجود نہیں تھا۔ وہ قومیت پر اسی موقف کے حامی تھے، جو جدید سوشل سائنسز پیش کرتا ہے۔

[@raeesgul9537]

Maulana Maudoodi's views are to be understood by going through his literature. Once you study his literature objectively, you would do justice. These people qoute him either wrongly or out of context. My appeal to you is, that you please study his literature and then decide, not by listening to this so called research.

[@quamrulhassan8205]

If u fail to produce counter references then its a lie. I'm from Bangladeah. So u understand my position. Don't take anyone elses liability on your shoulder.

[@raeesgul9537]

I am inviting all and sundry to go through Maudoodi's literature and then decide, instead of believing in hearsay. What can be a more fair way to judge a person through. You will find the exact truth there. The opinion of this so- called researcher is biased, unfair and fabricated to say the least.

[@quamrulhassan8205]

@@raeesgul9537 Bhai, ASALKM. What u r saying is usual reflection of Indian Pakistani and Bangladeshi mindset. Practically these people make their's leaders as Nabi. One kind of worshipping big personalities. In the year 1971 Pak military leaders committed crimes of genocide killing raping what not. But what was the role of Jamaeti Islami? Mr. Moududi was alive at that time. Writing me keya hai, vo janke mai keya karoo? Hazrat Ali ka ofatse formation of Pakistan, inn between more than thousand years, do we observe any Islamic state? Sabhi Raja bhasha ka rulings. To keya inn hazaro saalse duniyaka khone khone me jo Muslim salat adakar roza rakhkar politics me participate na kar k guzar giya oosme keya kisi ko Jannat nehi milega? Dharm se state nehi chale

[@renedescartes7540]

Please give references of Moudoodi's statements.

[@zaer7340]

Rene Descartes he did

[@Taimur_Laal]

chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2011/01/mawdudi-jamat-e-islami-deobandis-had.html

[@javaidbeigh7073]

There are so many references ,reas his own books

[@shuja74]

@@Taimur_Laal مساوات کی کٹنگ کے بجاے آپ اگر مولانا کی کتاب پڑھتے تو یہ جھوٹ نہ کہتے ۔

[@MrSalahshamsi]

He is twisting the facts, please read my comment , I just posted.

[@sknandiphy]

When I visited India, I found Indian Muslims more fundamentalist than Bangladeshi Muslims and Bangladeshi Hindus are more fundamentalist than Indian.

[@syedabdullahbalkhi5609]

Maududi ney to Pakistan ko Masjid kaha tha sahab!

[@usmansiddiqui4217]

Maududi aik kutta wahabi tha

[@shayanshah557]

Lol maududi against jinnah ye google kerlo stop believing everything you hear and please dont abuse anyone here atleast dont abuse in the name of islam

[@javedsultan4830]

@@usmansiddiqui4217 or tu shayad peda hi harami hova.

[@ShahidHussain-qn1to]

Give source plzz

[@HamzaKhan-ue7ii]

Maulan maududi justified the creation of Pakistan in accordance with the Quran and Sunnah in his book "Musalman aur maujuda siyasi qashmakash". The muslim league couldnt bring any justification for the creation of pakistan except a national argument. It was naulana maududi who justified pakistans creation in accordance with islam.

[@syedalisuleman]

Dr Taimoor, I understand that you want to highlight the difference in religious parties' thought back in the 40s and 50s and now, but this could have been done better. Having seen a video coming from a scholar like you, I was expecting a detailed analysis of Maududi sb's ideology but instead I found rhetoric only. Picking and choosing certain excerpts from a scholar's essays out of context, with snide remarks, just to make your point isn't something I expected from you.

[@aussie.clippa]

Ali Suleman very well said

[@Taimur_Laal]

Apparently you don't read the title of a presentation. It is "Maududi on Jinnah". Not "A Detailed Analysis of Maududi". Enough said.

[@umarwarraich]

@@Taimur_Laal Taimoor sb you looked very literate and researcher kind of person but all the references you quoted here are not reliable, u are recording a video in a room with thousands of books and u are giving references "u can get these from internet" amazing. Just providing a serial number and not mentioning the month and year of a monthly paper and just providing a newspaper article how can u prove something?? and u dont even know that Tafheem ul Quran is a tafseer of Quran not a political book.I would love to see all these things from real tarjaman ul quran papers and Tafheem ul Quran from you in next video, as u r saying 1 can get them easily then y not another video with genuine proofs and references. Atleast u could do some proper research and provide genuine references but unfortunately u did not and u just said u can get these from internet. did u get ur PhD thesis with providing same kind of references?????

[@floraprolandscapepakistan7226]

@@umarwarraich you wrote right. Mr Taimoor told not more than rubbish and his mindset about religious organizations.

[@AliAsghar-co7xt]

@@Taimur_Laal Sir islam itself allows all religions to coexist why do we need a western word secularism to understand this. It's just common sense we dont need a lecture on secularism to understand this. Islam asks us to respect all beliefs and to respect people of all creed and color . As simple as that.

[@syedmuhammadmuzaffar7947]

بھائ مولانا مودودی کو پڑھ تو لو ۔۔۔۔ شاید اللہ تمھیں بھلائی عطا فرمائے

[@farhanahmad2932]

o bhai india mein muslims ke minority hai aur secularism un ke survival ke liye vital hai

[@animeshjha8603]

pakistan me bhi to hindu minority hai bhai

[@tanvirshaikh7415]

Agar Hindu secular hoke India mein Musalmaano ke liye qurbaani de sakte hai (eg . Hemant karkare.. Gauri Lankesh)... Toh humaara bhi farz hai Pak aur Bangladesh ke Hinduo ki hifaazat...

[@aunthegeek5788]

@@tanvirshaikh7415 Well said

[@tanvirshaikh7415]

@@aunthegeek5788 ... Shukriya dost... Hinduo aur deegar qaum ke bhi bade ehsaanaat hai Musalmaano pe. PAK aur Bangla ke minorities pe hue har zulm ka badla liya jaayega aur...jaahil Maulviyo se unki jahaalat aur hewaaniyat ka hisaab liya jaayega.... Insha Allah! ... dua mein yaad rakhna... aur apne doosre Hindu aur gheir Muslim bhaaiyo ko kehna ki hum jaise Musalmaan abhi zinda hai. Ek Salmaan Taseer ko maarke Taalibani khush na ho.

[@muhammadhassanahmad5002]

tu aaj kiya ho raha hai wahan aur kiya secularism hai ind mein kuch sooch k bola karo

[@synhope3746]

The World HQs of tabliquee jamaat, Nadwa, Deoband, Barelvi school of though is in India.

[@HalalTimes]

It is wrong to say that a Hindu wrote Pakistan"s national anthem. The problem is most people in Pakistan do not bother to research properly before issuing sweeping statements.

[@alicheema3561]

واہ کیا بات ہے پائی جان

[@singwithfakhr-e-alamkhatta2044]

You are totally misinterpreting that speech. Honourable Jinnah never uttered any such things. He simply assured the non Muslims about their safety and legal rights.

[@mdsaifurrahman9462]

Jinnah had a great vision and he knew it very well state should treat every citizen equally irrespective of religion and that is the civilised norms around the world and also supported by Islamic principles.

[@muhammedawan4414]

Liaqat Ali used to drink liqour wrapped in handkerchief while in prime minister office but he reprensented objective constitution.

[@hakimmalik6995]

Maulana maudodi was against creation of pakistan, but had to move to pakistan. And kept on trying to islamize the state dangerously.

[@syedabukhari1792]

Kuch logon se such bardasht nehi hota

[@ahmedahmedspainbarcelona7359]

Hi salam sis my name is naveed from spain barcelona plz i want to take some info about ahmedies plz can u help me if possible thx GOD BLESS U

[@syedabukhari1792]

Hi hafiz Nadeem I dnt know much but you can find if you google

[@ahmedahmedspainbarcelona7359]

@@syedabukhari1792 plz sis ap ni kr sakty

[@Football_club9]

@@ahmedahmedspainbarcelona7359 😂😂😂😂

[@Football_club9]

@@syedabukhari1792 😝😝😝

[@lalasehraye1]

At10:04, your friend quoted Jinnah from Tafheemul Quran ? is that what you said?? your whole video is out of references, quoting Maududi on behalf of your friend is no way near rationale. you lost the battel already....

[@haiderqasmi231]

His friend has published papers not student essays, academic papers are the only credible sources of information. Before you begin typing over here i suggest you check up who Dr. Qasmi is.

[@lalasehraye1]

@@haiderqasmi231 You are on wrong foot. we are not talking about Mr. Qasmi but on this lecture particularly. God bless all

[@bbhusari]

This man is indeed a brilliant scholar, he should concentrate more on his teaching job and less on his political engagements. The real beneficiaries would be students and young people of Pakistan . Leftists are always very good in history and they are the ones who had lions share in writing the history in India , off course I don't think it's so in pakistan. Professor sahab thank you very much for your brilliant commentary on Pushtuns, their plight, their aspirations and their present predicament . In early this year the Pushtuns were very much in news for their protest marches, meetings and their slogan........ iske piche wardi hai ! . They were indeed perturbed over killing of their young man by a karachi police despot. They had a formidable presence on KZbin and handled PTM portal very well . The entire lot of people appeared very genuine, hard-working and their leaders appeared very honest and simple. There were few ladies also on forefronts, who were very dignified and spoke so well about their people's problems. Yes there is no news about them in last one year, their portal also disappeared. We knew about Bacha Khan, his Khudai KhidmatgAr party, friendship with Mahatma Gandhi and his role in freedom struggle. But today listening to you I got the real perspective of his role in emancipation of societies in Pak-Afgan bordering areas. Your commentary on Islamic Majahbi parties was so well articulated and factual. Moudadi - Barrister Jinnah feuds, mistrust is subject of so many books. Bhutto Sahab's downfall from power was also accelerated by PNA ( Pak National Alliance ) at whose core were majhabi parties ! Best wishes prof. Sahab and also to your students

[@sanaullasharief5319]

Muslims in Pre-partition India. Within weeks of the Pakistan resolution of the Muslim League at Lahore, Indian Muslims organized MUSLIM AZAD CONFERENCE in Delhi (Queen’s Park, Chandni Chowk) between April 27-30, 1940 (it was to conclude on April 29 but was extended by one day due to tremendous participation and pressure of the work) with 1400 delegates from almost all parts of India attending it. The leading light of this conference was former Premier of Sind, Allah Bakhsh who presided over the conference. was one of such heroes.

[@rizzwan]

Hahaha amazing! Madudi and the other mullahs need to be exposed like this.

[@maleekhaider3247]

You did great work in ARAB ISRAEL CONFLICT.. History & creation of KSA was missing in that, Could you please creat video on this topic. Thanks a million for your work.

[@buttsb6152]

Why do you want to open a new pandora box?

[@mubashirahmed4869]

where I will find the book muslim against the muslim league ?

[@majeedullahkhan8634]

Secondly, always quote Maududi sb directly from his books or periodicals because a lot of lies have been associated with Syed Abul Ala Maududi by other Islamic schools of thought.

[@mdsaifurrahman9462]

Maulana Maududi himself was a distorted person without having a clear viewpoint of life or Islam, he just followed some middle eastern political writers and he loved the way communists and facists captured power and ruled. His facsist face was very much clear when his party started genocide in erstwhile East Pakistan in support of the Army to capture power. He is responsible for the rise of religious extremism in Pakistan when he started a riot in collaboration with other religious mafia groups in 1953.

[@zahidhussain-zf1iy]

Taimor Sir big fan of you. I have never seen such a great scholar and philosopher and teacher

[@02023333]

Dear Taimur Very good and nuanced program.

[@AbdulRazzaq-vs3qr]

Sir, how to interpret the contradiction between Jinnah's Secular State concept and Two Nation Theory leading to the creation of Pakistan? Kindly, make a separate video, if possible...

[@shifaullahcheena2164]

Sir I appreciate your effort please continue to make this kind video clips

[@prabhakarvaid9214]

Very interesting & informative Prof ...I started watching ur channel few days back ..I'm completely awestruck with ur clarity of thought & incisive view point ! Have u written any book on partition of India ! Pls share details ...as this subject has always haunted me coz my ancestory goes to Pakistan Punjab !!

[@atharsayyed1037]

Allah Taala Maulana maududi Ko Jannat ul firdus me aala maqam ataa farmaye.

[@aelaa7495]

Agree with Maududi's perspective of Muslim league, Pakistan is still running according to western style of governance, it's institutions imitate West , religion is relegated to background ,there is nothing such thing called 'Islamic Republic of Pakistan',it's a misnomer

[@usmansiddiqui4217]

How many mullahs does Pakistan need to become prosperous? Is 1 million enough? How about 10 million?

[@crossbreaker6718]

Mr Taimur Rahman ! Maudoodi sahab Ki sari baatey to such sabit ho gai, un ki konsi baat ghalat hay aaj ke dor me sub waazeh ho gaya hay, Aap kidher ki baat kerty ho?!!

[@alizaidi3842]

Tmhara abba hoga aisa

[@Jandanaala]

You can argue with words ... But it's a bitter truth... Màududi was not just a person it was the thinking of Islam

[@sardargull66]

mr. you have lies quoating from un authentic books and authors and musawat paper of peoples party. if m.maudidi was against muhammad ali jinnah and pakistan then why quaid azam muhammad ali jinnah asked maudidi to deliver speech on radio to state islamic state concept and idea in 1948. and also sometime read faiz ahmad faiz statement , : muslim leage workers use to give reference of maudidi book , two nation theory in support of their claim for pakistan.: and when this accusation was presented before mudidi that were you against the creation of pakistan, he said ,i find as a blessing if i have a chance to a very small piece of land where i can practise islam how i can oppose such a big country being made on the name of islam.

[@AllamaMashriqi]

The Pakistan Achievement Pakistanis consider the creation of Pakistan by Quaid-e-Azam M.A. Jinnah in 1947 to be their greatest victory. But this mindset reflects a weakness, not a strength. It reinforces the notion that Muslims were weak or could not stand up to a majority population and needed a separate homeland. The unfortunate reality is that the British used Mr. Jinnah to divide India and Jinnah essentially helped the British, so that he could become the founder of Pakistan and bolster his own political career. Mr. Jinnah’s politics were exposed by Allama Mashriqi in the Al-Islah weekly journal. This is why the history books only teach the All-India Muslim League’s version of events.

[@azadajk7128]

Allama Mashriqi Hahaha. This warped understanding is hilarious. Those Hindus would not even agree to basic constitutional protections for Muslims or Muslim majority states. Partition was the end result - not the initial objective. A separate homeland for Muslims was required and I’m glad we achieved it. None of the “Muslim” arguments advanced against the independence of Pakistan actually make any sense. Even if the founders were secular - why were they complaining if they wanted to keep a united India secular? Amazing logic. As for the current position - yes Pakistan is not a true Islamic country but at least we can work towards that. What would those Muslims of current day Pakistan have achieved living under the thumb of the Hindus? Ask yourself another question - do you think Palestine should just be consumed by Israel and live under the apartheid state? If not, why not? Why do you insist on something else for Pakistani Muslims? I’m against nationalism in all its guises - however it’s better to have separate state for Muslims in the current world where the khilafah had been finished. Pakistan and Pakistanis will be in a stronger position InshaAllah to make a positive change for Islam and Muslims. We have to remember the country is only 70 years old. May Allah bless it’s people and bring them justice and true Islamic rulership and free them from the cowardice of their current democratic system.

[@aamirarman2624]

پاکستان کا پہلا کونسا ترانہ تھا جو ہندو نے لکھا ہم نے تو ایک ہی سنا اور پڑھا جو کہ حفیظ جالندھری نے لکھا.

[@Taimur_Laal]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/h3LQZaF3rrh3ibs

[@khaliljibran4104]

@@Taimur_Laal Thnx dr too much love from indian occuipied kashmir srinagar

[@khurshidanwar1483]

Moulana Moudoodi was perfectly right and the 74 year of Pakistan has proved him right.He was not against a separate country ruled by Islamic laws ;Sharia, for the Muslims of the subcontinent.But he believed and openly expressed that Muslim League and its leadership were neither capable nor sincere to introduce Sharia.The time has proved him right.Has Pakistan ever been ruled by Sharia?Who had stopped The founders to introduce Sharia straight away,just like Taliban.Or,who had stopped Liaqat ali Khan to introduce Sharia afterward.The only achievements of Liaqat Ali Khan were to imprison Moulana Moudoodi for reminding him to introduce Sharia,giving 2000 acres of land to Qadyanis to build Rabwa almost free and appointing a non Muslim to represent the Islamic Republic of Pakistan in the UNO.Is Pakistan ruled by Sharia at present?Are the average (not the elites) Pakistanis happy with this system which has made their lives miserable?Time has proved him right.

[@ahmedmujtabapasha7305]

Jo quotations ap ne boli haim un ka reference hai ap k paas ya internet se utha kai video bana dee

[@dramashub351]

Bro why dont you just say that pakistan should be a secular state and the tag of being the islamic republic of pakistan should be removed

[@johanliebert6198]

@Maarij Hassan ilzaam aap ne lagaya hai to prove bhi aap do na,Chalo ham prove de dain magar reference to do,is aadmi ne reference bhi incorrect or insufficient Dy Hain

[@johanliebert6198]

@Maarij Hassan He has not provided clear references,stupid infact he didn't provide any references at all,tarjuman ul quran has no jild,it's a monthly magazine and yeah I have listened everything he said.I think you've got it all wrong,what makes you think I am a MULLAH?Everything you said about the situation in Afghanistan and Iran,you think mullahs or Taliban are to blame for it?Before making such stupid claims,get your facts right and a measly knowledge would have surely sufficed.

[@johanliebert6198]

@Maarij Hassan Are you stupid?if not then kindly read my comment again

[@johanliebert6198]

@Maarij Hassan Hence proved,you're are indeed stupid

[@Imammaryasir000]

Also I have read a few books by Syed Maududi. Of them the Al Jihad Filslam was written in 30s. In any of the books I haven’t found any such abusive and filthy language making it very difficult for me to believe in what Prof shb is quoting. Must be some fake papers handed over to prof shb. Also why did Syed Maududi then was given the task of delivering Islamic lectures on Radio Pakistan by MA Jinnah after independence?

[@mohsinafzaal7550]

“Kash” Pakistan Turkey jesa secular hota.....☹️....and I do not understand why Molana came to Pakistan when he was so much against its creation?

[@usama.a783]

And why u com 2 pakistan it was created bya name of kalma..u shoud go out

[@mohsinafzaal7550]

Islam 360 I did not came to Pakistan, I was born in Pakistan, Mr Jinnah was a secular man and wanted a secular Pakistan! When you bring religion in politics then there is a holy war among its citizens and that’s what is going on....

[@usmansiddiqui4217]

Maududi came to spew his "holier than thou" mentality

[@usmansiddiqui4217]

@@usama.a783 please get a modern education and understand that society progresses with the light of science and reason

[@usama.a783]

@@usmansiddiqui4217 you also study modern science and Islam. Then you will know reality of islam..rules of islam will not be changed except tools

[@kashifquamar7004]

Hii Mister lal An India Muslim here. At 3:33 you said that Muslims wants secular state in India . The reason is BJP idea of ram rajya is exclusive of minorities in which only Hindus would live contrary to Islamic state which considers minorities 'zimmis'. The word secular was not originally present in our constitution. And most Muslims in India support the idea of Ram rajya as defined by Mahatma Gandhi . Only those who insist on having this fake secularism are leftists like you . I would be more than happy to see Ram Rajya based on the principles of Ramji

[@saqibkhan2908]

You are one of the greatest teacher I have come across, thank you so much for enlightening us with your great knowledge of things, Pakistan needs more people like you

[@AssadAli7]

Brother he is the most ignorant of Islam and probably you too are marching on the same lines and no Pakistani wants people like him!

[@DipakBose-bq1vv]

Exchange of population, over a period of 30 years, between India and Pakistan (and Bangladesh) is the only solution. It was suggested by Ambedkar in 1946, but still, there is time and this is the right time. India should discuss this matter with both Sheikh Hasina and Imran Khan and settle the issue. Unfortunately, we refuse to go through the core issue: Two Nations Theory, the basis for the partition of India in 1947. Two nations theory is real and the Muslims have accepted it and we also have accepted it. Now the whole world has accepted it. It is Muslims versus the rest of the world.

[@HamzaKhan-fm1dx]

Taimoor sir ! I love the way of your teaching style but please unite this already dispersed country. Do not spread hate among us. We want peace and only peace ! 💖

[@Taimur_Laal]

I am teaching you who has created this hate.

[@singhparihar8530]

@@Taimur_Laal sir meri bhi yahi dikkat hai k kisi bhi Pakistani sacchai baat kro to unko lagta hai unko bhadkaya ja rha maine ek Pakistani ko bataya k india Muslim bade accha se rehte hai to vo manne k liye taiyar hi ni tab Maine bataya k yaha india me to jinnah ji ladki bhi rahti hai unke sath bhi kisi ne koi badsaloki ni ki jo k india ko tudne wali k ladki hai

[@essz_i4643]

@@Taimur_Laal you r right, there are several pieces of evidence that highlight it .Maulana was perplexed scholar.....

[@SyedZulfiqarHS]

@TaimurRahman Sir link is not working

[@nazarrather5800]

May you please draw some light over Maududi's support to Miss Fatima jinnah, while contesting General Ayoob. Had by then, Maududi changed his views over Jinnah and democracy? And by the way how will you define Pakistan of last 71 years, as for as its state character is concerned? P.s. Whether it be secular setups of Batto's or shareef's or the so called religious dictatorial one of Zia, all have landed your nation where Lenin and of course afterwards Stalin landed their nation.. For sure power corrupts unless handed over to God fearing, knowledgeable people by conscious and sensible masses.

[@mdsaifurrahman9462]

jamaat e islami always supported military dictators to grab power and never accept democracy. We have seen their action during the oppression of 1971 in Bangladesh and 1980s during dictatorial rule of General Zia.

[@faisalzaman6639]

The reference about Jinnah sahab quoted by you from Tafheem ul Quran is wrong i guess.. It may be tafheemat but not tafheem ul Quran..fobara check kr lain..

[@maazbinmuhammad2230]

اگر یہ صاحب مولانا کی کتب اور تفہیم القرآن کو خود سے ایک بار ہی پڑھ لیتے تو آج خیالات بالکل مختلاف ہوتے مگر ہدایت اللہ۔جسے خاہتا ہے اسی کو عطا فرماتا ہے

[@ibadullahthebow696]

⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️ اوہ صاحب ! کہاں سے لگاتے جارہے ہو آپ مولانا مودودی رح پر یہ سب صحیح سے رفرینس دیں یہ جو چیپ حوالے دے رہے ہو آپ یہ مولانا مودودی رح کی زبان ہی نہیں ہے

[@danialkhalid3430]

آپ جو بات بات پر تفہیم القرآن کہہ رہے ہیں آپ نے خود پڑھیں بھی ہے

[@MrSalahshamsi]

I have read Tafheem, marhoom was mujadid of last century .

[@burhanbukhari1831]

Lgta to ni h.. asay log librals k sath he uthaye jayngy. Roz e qyamat

[@muhammadbilalmemon271]

People can make Jinnah controversial but not Dr. Allama Muhammad Iqbal.

[@muhammadbabar6972]

ملاں کو جو ہے ہند میں سجدے کی اجازت ناداں یہ سمجھتا ہے کہ آزاد ہے اسلام اقبال

[@faizrajput9044]

Tafheem up Quran mein Kidr Kr K Likha ye bi bta Dein Halla K AAP nay khud bi nhi tafheem UL Quran perha

[@tipusultan3690]

سارے ملا مذہب کے پردے میں اپنے ذاتی مفادات کو پورا کررہے ہیں. شکر ہے کسی نے تو اس سچ سے پردہ اٹھا یا کہ ملا کی کیا حقیقت ہے. بہت خوب جناب 👍

[@shariyaatyaashahadat5841]

Iss sa sbb jhoot bola, bhtr haa tum khud Quran parho or Islam prr chalo.

[@zulkar.n]

What are you talking about ? Tarjuman ul Quran was written by Molana Azad not Molana Mawdudi and you are quoting the writing of Molana Azad.

[@Taimur_Laal]

chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2011/01/mawdudi-jamat-e-islami-deobandis-had.html

[@zulkar.n]

@@Taimur_Laal 👍👍. So it was the journal, tarjuman ul quran

[@zulkar.n]

@@Taimur_Laal Thanks for showing evidence.