State is really dragging this case on… I mean they asked this guy about what did he have to learn when he changed jobs from sprint and t mobile… I find that irrelevant. His overall training and credentials ok, I don’t have the quote but asking “well what training did you have to do at your new job to get up to speed (not to become an expert)” is irrelevant. And I mean this is just 1 example, dozens and dozens of these type of questions every week are just 1 small example of the state droning on and on. And I was going to say would love to hear more relevancy objections from the defense but I imagine they are thinking this is in their favor since the juror is probably rolling their eyes at all the droning… I can’t imagine sitting through all this and then being asked to remember it all during deliberations and trying to come to a conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt… that seems like an impossible task given the volume of the content here. I thought on the state has had some hiccups but normal ppl see ppl throwing up hand gestures and selling drugs they think thts a gang but idk now yall. I think the state is really doing a disservice to the VICTIMS, as Ms love likes to point out all of a sudden, by dragging this case on and on. As a juror during deliberations I’d being thinking there’s reasonable doubt that I forgot some exculpatory information just bc this shit was said literally a year ago…. Can anyone explain Tht? How can a juror reasonably be expected to parse all this shit together and make a decision