META SHAKE UP?! | Marvel YAP #23

[@blastarrow6562]

Great yup! Good job guys

[@martofel]

Great catch on the needed text change for V Hand!

[@Thisiswerewolf]

Hi there hello! My deck building skills are pretty lackluster (I'm working on it) but when Anti-Venom came out I knew he was good. That made it very frustrating to hear so many content creators (not you, I didn't know who you were yet) trash talking Anti-Venom. They were just going on and on about how awful he is, I couldn't believe it. 😮 Have a great day, you are guys are awesome! 🎉 😊

[@swedishZ0mBi3]

I saw a great suggestion about making Luke only affect 1-3 cost cards, basically protect the little dudes like the comics. Pretty cool. I agree that something has to change with Luke, he is a catch all solution right now to cards on both sides, locations and affliction decks. However if they nerf him to the ground like last time where he only worked on 1 location then Ajax would go from A-tier to just a S-tier +. That could be very dangerous.

[@Scata727]

I am not spending keys this week to try for moonstone but instead I am trying for black swan

[@cloudd6535]

I was kinda low on Moonstone, but it's like she really surprised me she's pretty damn good.

[@Giuspy]

Personally, the cards I would buff/nerf to are the following (Don't kill me): Gambit 3/3:Discard the lowest card in your hand and afflict the highest card on the enemy field with negative power equal to the discarded card (destroying cards without having negative effects for discarding is too oppressive, having an ability that allows you to decrease the power seems much more balanced in my opinion and therefore in this way he could create combos with bullseyes, scorn and daken) Mr. negative 4/-3 Gorr 6/-3 I believe that these cards for their potential should be decreased in power, negative should have a high price to pay to be able to play the cards for free and gorr is a card that has statistics too high for an ongoing card (ajax is a 5 /7 but needs hazmat and other cards to go up in power) Doom 2099: 4/1 (a 1 reduction in power helps make him more counterable by cards like red guardian, lady deathstrike) Luke cage 4/5: cage should be a card that helps against affliction decks and I don't think it should be in affliction decks. a cost increase would allow it to be removed from these decks in favor of other 3-cost cards such as "Diamond back" coming out in February. Miek 1/0: ongoing: When you discard a card, this gains +1 Power and can move next turn. (I think Miek must be a slightly weaker Morbius but I could also be wrong about that) pixie 1/2: at a cost of 2 I find it too slow Selene 2/3: ongoing: afflict cards moved to the enemy field with -2 power. (a sort of Victoria hand) Black Knight 2/2 Activate: Discard the highest card in your hand, add the Ebony Blade to your hand with that card's Power.

[@tuccrr]

@@Giuspy I really like the creativity with these ideas! And GREAT descriptions too 🔥

[@Rambrus0]

Mr Negative doesnt make a difference tbh. That Gorr change would just glue him to Mr Negative. + He is not a card that needs to get nerfed really. People thought about Red Hulk in his current state too but now almost nobody plays him. Selene is not a bad card, it just lacks proper support. If we get another Goblin style card, she becomes good. Black Knight is waaaay too strong. a 2/2 that adds a 4/20 without any enabler to your hand is everything but balanced. You removed one his counters and removed the need for supporting cards. Not a good design All the others are fine.

[@Rambrus0]

If Luke would get nerfed to a 4/5, there is no need for Antivenom to get nerfed since the curve is ruined. Way less good

[@intheshadows1623]

OTA Hopes: Make Crystal a 2/3 And I like the 3/3 Adam Worlock, both versions. Make Mjölnir a 0/2 to be in line with the buffed Stormbreaker If you want to nerf Luke Cage, make him only effect one Lane like Cosmo I would like to see a 3/3 Enchantress, so it is like Cosmo as a tech card, and can be replaced with each other depending on the meta Edit: make Bishop a 2/2 like the collector. They both are kind of the "same card"

[@Rambrus0]

Oh my god these are horrible balance suggestions. Crystal as a 2/3 would go in every deck. Mjölnir is the only good idea here. Luke was nerfed once to a single lane and he was complete trash. Enchantress as a 3/3 is a Rouge of steroids. 2/2 Bishop would be insanely busted. They arent the same card because one is harder to achive than the other. Even if you play 1 card per turn, he is a 2/6. Scaler cards are very scary reduce their cost.

[@migumusica]

Ongoings are already so punished in this game. Making Enchantress a 3/3 you may as well remove them from the game

[@BetarayBillLover]

I really didn’t like the argument about stealing it’d be nice if they still stole the 1 power but I can’t argue that the way glen explained it made way more sense

[@tuccrr]

@@BetarayBillLover you see the datamines 👀

[@BetarayBillLover]

@ I did, very excited for that Eson week

[@tuccrr]

@ yeah that week looks very fun!!

[@Yoyo-si3hq]

Shocker should go to ‘when u end a turn with unspent energy draw this card’

[@dwilson284]

Don’t say “first”!

[@Scata727]

I need dance to tell me a more versatile 1 drop than Nico besides maybe hydra bob

[@cloudd6535]

I used to play arishem in a proving grounds for alliance missions it was fine, but now it's just bad, I'm fine though i just don't play him, and i see absolutely no one playing him. And i agree wiccan is just too good if you don't play him in your deck you just lose. And there is absolutely no downside, it's 4/7.

[@ColHozeh]

This unwarranted and narrow outlook, nerf luke cage (who has had the one lane effect nerf before but was reversed bc it was obviously nonsense and luke cage as it is is nothing to worry about) Is ridiculous. But i have no doubt you people will continue to advocate to kill off another piece of marvel snap that was fine as is. That's what gamers do.