anyone with an opinion about Middle East affairs should know about Picot, Sykes, and Balfour.. the forefathers of chaos
@aneurindavies5943Ай бұрын
"The most powerful form of Lie is that of Omission....." The George Orwell Foundation Archives. Not enough discussion has taken place over the Balfour Declaration and the Sykes-Picot Agreement.
@robertrichard6107Ай бұрын
He snuck the word 'Israel' in there when it didn't exist. Occupied Palestine occurred to create a 'Jewish' homeland so that U.S. Jews in the media would bring the U.S. on board to fight in the war on the Western Front. Since Lenin blew the whistle on Sykes-Picot then made peace with Germany, Britain needed the U.S. on the Western Front to fight more Germans. That's what Balfour was written for, to bring U.S. officially into the war. They're actually secretly supporting the White Russians with arms, and some troops by that time. The Turkish Minister of War actually gave a German battleship crew Arab Feez hats to wear when they went through to the Black Sea and shelled the Russian Navy base at Sebastopol. The Russians declared war on Turkey then Nov. 1, 1914. The Mid-East war was actually over then by 31, October 1918 a dozen days before the 'Armistice' which bounced Germany's Blank Check to Austria, and gave Italy a lump of coal for Christmas.
@078OGАй бұрын
Dont forget Charles Henry Churchill
@secretname4190Ай бұрын
there was chaos there long before any englishman ever entered the mediterranean
@LPRH246Ай бұрын
And !@@secretname4190
@zensunni847029 күн бұрын
Roy is such an entertaining guy, immensely enjoying his lectures. I sometimes feel like I'm back in high school history class because he's telling ME history in quite an unbiased way, or shall I say the way locals see it. Even his pronounciation of Turkish names are so close to the original.
@ChopinIsMyBestFriend24 күн бұрын
He’s a complete dumbass 😂😂😂 I laugh at his lectures because of how inaccurate they are.
@theghostofbabanovac706923 күн бұрын
I've heard him making many mistakes and he talks about historical events in a very subjective manner
@clinteastwood778020 күн бұрын
Hes extremely biased and wrong about many things
@zensunni847020 күн бұрын
@@clinteastwood7780 Not according to a local middle eastern like me regarding the Ottoman past and after WW1
@ThomasGLee10 күн бұрын
@@clinteastwood7780 educate us then. If he is wrong, what precisely is he wrong about, and what is the correct answer? If you can't answer, then your statement is false. If you can answer, great! Edify us.
@transplant-f3pАй бұрын
That was one cause of WW 1. England and France drooled as the Turkish Empire start to fall apart. Those two countries wanted control of oil rich parts of the Middle East.
@Ged-v8i29 күн бұрын
Needed oil to power the new war ships ,,,,Haffa port Palastian.
@carmenonea380028 күн бұрын
Russia defeated the Otoman Empire and was hit by the uk and zio-eews usa with the bolshevik so called revolution. 2 with on stroke and the uk moved in to carve up the oil rich lands
@scott476628 күн бұрын
@@Ged-v8i Factory's, industrial revolution. But war ships came next.
@akforge28 күн бұрын
@@transplant-f3p no it was the Khazars that run the central banks that use the UK, France, the US, etc. as their enforcers to created their Zionist state in Palestine.
@viaqwerty813728 күн бұрын
@@transplant-f3p I think the situation was more complicated. UK & France had been supporting the Ottomans (like a rope supports a hanging man) from totally collapsing as ling as they could control it. Crimea, (predatory) loans, creditor administration of taxes and trade capitulations . Even early rebellions by minorities weren't seen as helpful, until the Russians started backing South Slavs and Balkan independence became inevitable. But when the Ottomans overplayed their hand and threatened UK/France by allying with the Germans, then the game was up.
@KyteasahighАй бұрын
*“Our revenge will be the laughter of our children”* *-Irish Freedom Fighter Bobby Sands* 🇮🇪🤝🇵🇸
@GalternativesАй бұрын
❤
@MartinaNugent-yt8igАй бұрын
@@Kyteasahigh R.I.P Bobby sands and those other hunger strikers who died !!🌹🌹🌹🌹🥀🥀🥀🇮🇪💚💚🇵🇸☘️☘️
@robthomas3811Ай бұрын
Why dont you guys accept a couple million asylum seekers?
@AliAli-et7zyАй бұрын
Free brave Irish people and Ireland!
@MartinaNugent-yt8ig29 күн бұрын
@AliAli-et7zy love from Ireland to you and yours my friend💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚☘️☘️☘️☘️☘️☘️☘️☘️
@MartinaNugent-yt8igАй бұрын
They used to say the sun never sets on the british empire! It was because God could never trust the brits in the dark! 🇮🇪💚🇵🇸💚💚💚☘️☘️☘️☘️
@TonyMidyettАй бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤
@greendragonspirit1646Ай бұрын
Makes sense, the British empire was a pirate voyage after all.
@PozafriaАй бұрын
Ireland will get back Belfast very soon Inshallah ❤😊
@MartinaNugent-yt8igАй бұрын
@pozafria one day hopefully!! Love from Ireland to you and yours 💚💚💚💚💚💚💚☘️☘️☘️☘️☘️☘️☘️☘️☘️
@KritzlynnАй бұрын
😂😂
@MohdYusufAbdulHamidАй бұрын
Prof Casagranda’s lectures are captivating!! Thanks for the interview.
@timfronimos45927 күн бұрын
Yes, they are captivating but not always accurate.
@jazminew3826 күн бұрын
@@timfronimos459 It's your Western history that isn't accurate. Prof Casagranda read Arab and Muslim history books. Real history with facts and evidence.
@philipscott445626 күн бұрын
@@timfronimos459 yes, I'm a construction labourer and can notice errors...
@philipm0625 күн бұрын
And he's always wrong.
@timfronimos45925 күн бұрын
@@philipscott4456 It's been my experience that more construction laborers and truck drivers have more common sense than degreed professionals and bankers.just saying
@CobraMagnus-tz5fqАй бұрын
Respects to prof ,Casagranda.. Listened to most of his lectures..
@robinali6903Ай бұрын
This guy took 17 minutes to say something that could have easily been condensed to 5 mins.
@Jasonrayblack27 күн бұрын
@@robinbreeds9217what does that have to do with anything, it's called super ego, deranged power trip and greed. You always have to keep in mind just because you open a book and read it I can guarantee ain't a total truth of it all
@beantreats27 күн бұрын
@@robinbreeds9217 did you not watch the video? he mentions iran many times
@viciouslyeatingaburger20 күн бұрын
@@robinali6903 he put context so we can understand more the motivs and why these event happened with domino effect where it continuously turned of what it is today.
@criticalwarrior921128 күн бұрын
As an Iraqi researcher of the Ottoman Empire, I would like to say this. In my opinion, instead of questioning how the "Arabs" were divided, we should question how the Ottoman Empire was divided and how we left the Ottomans alone in the war as an ummah. Our rebel Arab ancestors who fought against the British and protected the holy lands at the cost of their lives and who unfortunately rebelled against the Ottoman detachments and pashas who were stabbed in the back should be emphasized. We should talk about the idea that divided us as an ummah. Today, perhaps the entire Islamic geography is fighting each other and has sown the seeds of hatred and grudge against each other. We need to look at how these things came about. If our Arab ancestors had not betrayed the Ottomans today, neither the Sykest Picot agreements would have come into effect, nor would the Americans and the British have entered Iraq, nor would there have been genocide against our brothers in Palestine and Jerusalem would still be ours, that is, Islam's...
@billfarley916727 күн бұрын
From Canada: You nailed it!
@ibrahimaktepe888127 күн бұрын
You are absolutely correct. But Arab brothers choosed money over ummah.
@janpacana629327 күн бұрын
You are forgetting Science. With science they had more powerful weapons. My take is,The "-" people, with science, came and now they own you.
@rosierose325727 күн бұрын
You lament the fall of the Ottomans, but if you are looking at this historically, the Ottomans took over from the Romans & Byzantines, they took over from the Greeks who took over from the Persians, who took over from the Babylonians, the Assyrians …..
@criticalwarrior921127 күн бұрын
@@ibrahimaktepe8881 The only reason for this is not money, but the nationalist movement among the developing races and the French Revolution, unfortunately one of the cornerstones of the collapse of the empire. The Arabs were indoctrinated with the Baath idea, which did not benefit them at all and was used only as puppets by the Allied Powers. Today, we see the same ideas in the Kurdish militia forces in the north of Iraq.
@anonymousanonymous1997Ай бұрын
Dr. Roy has an amazing ability to tell historical facts with storytelling feel. Seen all of his lectures, multiple times. Check him out!!
@mahjarmehrpoujan29 күн бұрын
me to, he´s the best
@madharry679227 күн бұрын
You said it well, what I felt. Can you share link to his lectures?
@luisdavidllense229329 күн бұрын
History is Humanity's back story. If told correctly, we can trace the origins of how and why things have happened a certain way. More History, please! Thank you.
@Jasonrayblack27 күн бұрын
It's simple a long time ago beings came from other places of the cosmos and started all this s***
@Jasonrayblack27 күн бұрын
And you're never going to get the raw raw reality of things until after you pass away
@Akompliss23 күн бұрын
@@Jasonrayblack psychedelics are fun shortcut.
@uwekonnigsstaddt52416 күн бұрын
Hadrian…..ask Hadrian…..you can’t. He’s dead
@PubliusUSAАй бұрын
And, the Baghdad Railway contract went to the Germans. England flipped-out and had to derail that contract.
@admiral2005528 күн бұрын
The Ottoman gave teh bagdad railway contract to nazi germany
@davecopp935627 күн бұрын
The british always were this way. Devide and conquer, like the tribe.
@mikeboshko262325 күн бұрын
And here you are, railing away.
@PubliusUSA25 күн бұрын
@mikeboshko2623 Dummy
@mikeboshko262323 күн бұрын
@@PubliusUSA Are you not initiated in puns?
@asharkhan542028 күн бұрын
He’s like a teaching machine for history and politics ❤ Hats off God bless you
@omidsouresrafil7386Ай бұрын
The region’s entire problem lies within this absolutely crazy agreement.
@MansMan4206929 күн бұрын
"iT's BeCaUsE oF bAcKwArDs IsLaM!"
@ree540328 күн бұрын
@@MansMan42069it’s because of yo mama🤡
@lushu394328 күн бұрын
They were cursed before any agreement, the middle east has been into sectarian and political conflicts since many ages. Their culture does not even allow them to hold a real democracy. Dont listening to pseudo academics.
@AmunRaa28 күн бұрын
Well it's a factor @@MansMan42069
@JohnHaveaguessGoogle27 күн бұрын
Islam cannot be ignored as a primary problem in the region.
@SBwj1gr28 күн бұрын
Thanks!
@evelynsinclair493729 күн бұрын
Impressed with this, enjoyed learning new things!
@JesseReza-g4l26 күн бұрын
not Britain, but Inner London, the wealthiest corporations acting as god's gift to Mankind.
@rmr387024 күн бұрын
The corporations and wealthiest of Britain didn't fight, they had the British citizens do the fighting.
@edus963622 күн бұрын
The City of London, a country within a country controlling the rest and letting others die for it.
@sandtx491321 күн бұрын
City of London. The finance capital.
@edus963621 күн бұрын
City of London, independent from the UK but controlling it and Europe.
@karteenaahmadakhir234326 күн бұрын
Always a delight listening to Professor Roy Casagranda ❤
@johndoe-zz1nrАй бұрын
There’s a saying in Middle East that says that Britain has always its hand in events happening in Middle Eastern countries.Even with fall of Britain US always consult with UK when it comes to politics
@billfarley916727 күн бұрын
The Brits helped set up the country of Kuwait to stop Iraq having its own seaport.
@alkarimi31725 күн бұрын
The saying is: The work is the work of British!
@Heartstone-h8y17 күн бұрын
@@alkarimi317when Arabs were invading North and East Africa and South Asia, Southern Europe etc though, I'm sure everything they did was purely noble though, right?
@Heartstone-h8y17 күн бұрын
If Britain and the West hadn't been involved in Middle Eastern countries in anyway, your economies and standard of living today would be comparable to countries in Africa like Chad or Somalia.
@kingofbithynia15 күн бұрын
@@Heartstone-h8yWell this is püre lies. Khedivate of Egypt had same life quality as France starting from 1820s till the British Oppression started
@obinwataje26 күн бұрын
Thanks for the shorter snippet from the two hour talk Roy gives about the Middle East. Sort of an appetizer.
@benmacloughlin2612Ай бұрын
Roy Casagranga is superb. I’ve learnt so much jus5 watching the guy on KZbin.
@taj396828 күн бұрын
Except it wasn't real that Arabs stand against Ottoman empire out their self it was the west who created this conflict between Ottoman empire and Arabs
@Ubique292726 күн бұрын
You have been told lies and misinformation which you lap up.
@taj396826 күн бұрын
@@Ubique2927 huh?
@Ubique292726 күн бұрын
@@taj3968 Yes, that is you when faced with the truth and not biased propaganda.
@stopthatluca29 күн бұрын
In Galipoli the British had 3X the number of deaths than the Australians. Even the French suffered more deaths there than the Australians. Look it up.
@13tuyuti28 күн бұрын
Yes, but the Australians made the best song about it so they win.
@rdklkje1327 күн бұрын
And Aotearoa NZ is left off the map as usual…
@billfarley916727 күн бұрын
Churchill's folly.
@Tiglath-PileserXIX25 күн бұрын
Complete waste of lives. The British were BAMBOOZLED into joining WW1 and got their colonies to contribute lives to their mistake.
@kizgintosbaga24 күн бұрын
yeah i mean they are french. its normal
@pariaheep27 күн бұрын
This is such ESSENTIAL info! Very much appreciated... Mr Casagranda is most captivating, thank you so much for this dialogue!
@dougmes3768Ай бұрын
Divide and Conqure/Rule What a majestic example.
@pariaheep27 күн бұрын
Add to this the motto of MOSSAD: "By deceit thou shall wage war"...
@ms4you11 күн бұрын
this M.Aly era in ruling over Egypt is so compressed , the man build the modern Egy Army , Eco , Agriculture , Education , etc etc basically the modern Egypt we know today based upon his foundation ! also he was a part / soldier of the ottoman empire , who ruled over Egypt upon the Egyptian people request after defeating Napoleon
@SefSufi27 күн бұрын
Excellent summary of the main turning points of history... A commonly-held belief is that history repeats, however what is inarguable and verifiable is that it definitely tends to follow a complex rhyming scheme...
@aftersunrise2324 күн бұрын
in conclusion, if the Ottoman Empire would have existed today, we surely would had world peace...
@aulukut19 күн бұрын
It is always a pleasure and eye opener to listen to Prof. Dr. Casagranda, whose online lectures I never miss...
@AliceinAfricaАй бұрын
Oil be damned! (Religion is just a cover)
@harisnuman353828 күн бұрын
Is it?
@Lana-xd7ey26 күн бұрын
@@harisnuman3538 The West never religious to begin with they will use anything including Christianity which can make their colony docile and obedient
@Khosrow69527 күн бұрын
For a history professor, referring to the Persian Gulf as the Arabian Gulf is highly embarrassing. He spoke at length but said very little. Sykes and Picot were similar-lacking any real understanding of Middle Eastern history. They simply took a ruler and carved up the Ottoman Empire, and we are still suffering the consequences of their incompetence. Similarly, the lack of understanding of Middle Eastern history and culture by modern politicians and diplomats continues to result in historically significant events with devastating consequences. Examples include the Iranian Revolution, the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, and the Arab Spring uprisings. Please, take the time to learn before offering opinions.
@Squadron_Bodron20 күн бұрын
Lol humble yourself a little. Learn something before commenting on KZbin.
@ivandate997227 күн бұрын
i had an uncle just like Mr Roy. while looking inward in any scale, (family etc) , put heavely one sided on self blame. the perspective angle precisely the same as one of my uncle did. THE cynical smile also the same. what a lifestyle to choose.
@HumanBeingsRThinkingBeingsАй бұрын
Mind Begs the Question: ▪︎Who are Axis of Evil ▪︎Those who oppose Apartheid State ▪︎Those who support Apartheid State?
@GenariiАй бұрын
That's one way to quickly boil a complex issue down to black and white. That is, if one even accepts the label of "Apartheid" as accurate.
@taj396828 күн бұрын
@@Genarii you know who say they are the people of light against the people of darkness so who is making it about white and black here?
@dylanbecker581628 күн бұрын
Theres nothing complex about it, unless you want to obfuscate a straight forward issue. Amnesty international and the other 2 main organisations for humainity have been refering to it as such for 20-30 years. Nelson mandela and the others who experienced it consider(ed) that exactly to be what has been happening. As well as ethnic cleansing and illegal settlements that have repeatedly been condemned and were even made to stop and leave by reagan in the 80s. Israls attack on lebanon in the 80s reagan also called a holocaust. Oh yeah haaretz the main newspaper in israel has come out and said thats what it is - haaretz has been pretty honest the last few months and came out and said much of whats going on there their recently/currently as well (its worth checking out). Basically everywhere in the world that isnt under direct western corporate media believes it to be.. and even the areas under western corporate media, the majority of people now believe its an aprteid state. Where have you heard otherwise, rabbi unholy shmoley? Didnt the UN (maybe it was the criminal courts) just recently consider it a state that harms children and an aprteid state? Hasbara has failed globally and made isral a pariah state. Anyone supporting it is going to look reeeeeeally bad in a few years. Ghislaine maxwells father was high ranking mossad agent.. i wonder how many blackmails of world leaders that state has got on videotape? @Genarii
@taj396828 күн бұрын
@@dylanbecker5816 he meant the "axis of evil" is only considered evil because who do evil decided they stand against their intrest in doing more evil.
@taj396828 күн бұрын
@@dylanbecker5816 what your deal about news paper and media, normally people put their belive in front then brings evidence, when you just making statements about show and tell😂
@mckenziewilliamhowells23311 күн бұрын
Bloody hell the British Empire was brilliant. Always 5 steps ahead of everybody else.
@TakeTheRedPill_NowАй бұрын
Superb info. Deeply appreciated, gentlemen.
@taj396828 күн бұрын
Except about "the Arabs was against Ottoman empire" it didn't happen by itself, after west invaded north Iraq they bring spy name "lurance" played rule with other western to create this conflict
@ashwinisarah26 күн бұрын
How is Professor Roy Casagranda able to speak while confined to his chair??? The pacing is as integral to his content as the dad jokes...😂 Jokes aside, I love his story telling skills and he makes history so engaging and so relevant. ❤
@martyshea895627 күн бұрын
I say old chap, I don't know how this happened but our oil seems to have gotten under their sand
@mikev462127 күн бұрын
Brilliant!
@MartinaNugent-yt8ig26 күн бұрын
@martyshea8956😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂👏👏👏👏💚💚☘️☘️💚
@patrickhanley69625 күн бұрын
youre' not funny, just thought I'd tell you
@GreybushCounterpunchBoxing-z7d25 күн бұрын
@@patrickhanley696 Why isn't it funny?
@RalfBernhard-g1cАй бұрын
The off-continental *divider,* far away from regional disputes, grants its tools hypocritical advantages. *A long history of divide-and-rule/conquer.* The people of Eurasia and West Asia (most of whom are Semites, and the followers of Abrahamic religions) have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. *Because it is easier to divide people based on personal differences, than it is to unite them, based on what they have in common.* Strategically ambiguous outsiders have made use of this, for own advantages. In the era of empires, first Rome/Constantinople, then during WW1 the seat of POWER playing these games changed to London/Paris (Sykes-Picot/Balfour Declaration/WW1), then after the 1950's as European colonialism's power decreased, starting around the time a bark by Washington DC in 1956 (Suez Crisis/War) showed who the new boss was, the role of divider was simply taken over by Washington DC (the entire ME was the playground during the Cold War). Now the intention is simply to avoid unity in the ME, in order to "rule" over the dissent which is classical "divide and rule". *Today, their leaders are ALL tools.* Draw lines on the map without asking any of those affected. Endless wars, constant dissent. Divide and Rule. Oldest trick in the book... Who wields the POWER? Who has had (in all historical cases in the ME/Levant) the GEOGRAPHICAL ADVANTAGE of being able to reach all the other little "buck catchers" (tools, and other Roman-era style instruments of POWER), but could not be reached itself, because of a geographical-, technological-, organizational-, military-, strategic-, political advantage at any given point of a historical timeline? *Same types of people and systems. Different times. Same games.* ------------------------------------- The people of the Africa have been "divided and ruled" over by outsiders for centuries. Because it is easy to divide people. First Rome/Constantinople in North Africa, then during the era of Western imperialism the seat of POWER playing these games changed to the USA/Europe, then after the 1950's as European colonialism's power decreased, Africa was the "playground" during the Cold War. Moscow was taking on the role of arming the resistance. Once the dividers have reached peak power for themselves, by simply drawing lines on the map without asking any of those affected (Congo Conference/1884) so the own systems of gain can siphon off wealth like a giant vacuum cleaner. The intention was simply to avoid unity in Africa, in order to "rule" over the dissent which is classical "divide and rule". Today, all African dissenters, including some of Africa's own greedy corrupt leaders, are ALL tools. Endless wars, constant dissent. *Give a weak mind money, and they will dance for the dividers...* Divide and Rule. Oldest trick in the book... Four corners of the globe. Different ideologies and cultures. Same tools, same games. -------------------------------------- The people of the Americas (most of whom are Christians), including the USA, have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. Because it is easier to divide people based on personal differences, than it is to unite them, based on what they have in common. In the beginning stages of era of European Imperialism, first Spain and Portugal entered the Americas, employing the divide and rule technique of top-down power on the local systems (Aztecs/Incas), then after 1900 as European colonial powers' influence decreased, the role of divider was simply taken over by Washington DC. As the own power increased incrementally, the entire world became the playground after around 1900. _Today, it is the globalists who employ imperialist tools to play divide and rule games on their neighbours._ *Forget "nukes". The "divide and rule/conquer"-strategy is the most powerful force on the planet, because it can be used invisibly in times of peace, AND in times of crisis and war equaly.* Ever since the two-faced "snake" slithered down that tree of unity (fable), speaking out of both sides of the mouth (lies, deceit), human beings have fruitlessly warned and have continuously been warned, against "divisions" within a peaceful status quo. Such divisions create GAIN for OUTSIDERS (Eden as a "system" divided by lies and deceit). Now the intention is simply to avoid unity in the Americas, in order to rule over the dissent which is classical divide and rule. Endless wars on anything and everything from "drugs" to "terror", constant dissent with everything's a war war war... Insert levers of lies, mistrust... Create favourites: favouritism, by granting access to the own POWER, to those who volunteer to act as proxies... Point the systemic finger, everywhere else, by use of the own paid stooges of power... Divide and Rule. Oldest trick in the book...
@RobertojavierSilvaharth-ub3pz29 күн бұрын
They way they treat the "carve up", as if they were quartering a steer, not even considering the human factor, is absolute facism, totaly disgusting!!
@soniavadnjal755328 күн бұрын
No concern for humanity at all, no.
@donnavorce885628 күн бұрын
Sadly still ongoing today in many places. Palestine for one. South America has indigenous people trying to stay alive under similar barrages.
@chrisfreebairn87028 күн бұрын
You think Genghis Khan, Napoleon, the Ottomans, the Romans, the Hun, the Vikings, the Czars, Stalin, the Spanish, the Portuguese, the Germans, the Poles/Lithuanians, the Japanese, the Chinese, the Aztec or the Inca etc were different? This is how humans with power have always behaved. It doesn't make it right: it's just the way States act. Do you not know this?
@gumloproductions27 күн бұрын
It's "new imperialism" not fascism. Both are bad but fascism would be targeted at the home country first and foremost. New Imperialism was opportunistic expansionism and exploitation of foreign land at the expense of it's native inhabitants, and fascism is an ultranationalist, militaristic regimentation of society under an authoritarian dictator at the expense of people not considered an accepted part of the nation's machinery, usually including social outcasts and diasporic people.
@JohnHaveaguessGoogle27 күн бұрын
Which is how every empire has ever operated.
@vmhutch4 күн бұрын
"Nobody loves Australians . . . It's amazing that the British are like that . . ."
@stephenchappell7512Күн бұрын
They weren't, due to the fact that most Australian settlers were themselves Brits (hence their flag 🇦🇺)
@fjordhellas4077Ай бұрын
Prof Casagranda is an outstanding Historian!
@Ubique292726 күн бұрын
Learns the truth then lies about it and passes on misinformation.
@billfarley916727 күн бұрын
Interesting, but not a word about the promise the Brits made with the Sauds that if they assisted in the defeat of the Ottoman Empire the Brits would assure the Arabs could unite and have their independence. The Sykes-Picot agreement walked all over that promise and there's been chaos and turmoil ever since. I have read that the REAL cause of WWl was the scrambling for ownership of oil fields in the Middle East. The Germans were building a railway from Berlin to Istanbul and something had to be done to stop the German/Turkish coalition. The Brits wanted control of Middle Eastern oil and were willing to betray the agreement for Arab Independence. I understand big picture politics, but this agreement is behind most of the Middle Eastern resentment and the West has been paying the price ever since.
@silkekoehlmann418827 күн бұрын
Die Deutschen haben bis vor kurzem die letzten Reparationszahlungen für den 1. Weltkrieg geleistet! Jetzt zahlen sie für den 2. WK weil sich alle anderen Beteiligten der Kriege darauf geeinigt hatten Deutschland als " ALLEINSCHULDIG" zu verurteilen! Sieht so aus, als ob gerade die 3. SCHULD, von den üblichen Verantwortlichen, für uns vorbereitet wird!
@jamaalosman12526 күн бұрын
Britain made their fake promise to the Sharif of Mecca Hussein ibn Ali not Al Saud. Britain broke her promise and switched her support to Al Saud and the Wahhabis. The Hashemite sons of Hussein ibn Ali were were deported by Britain to Jordan, Syria and Iraq where they were made kings. The Hashemite line in Jordan exists to this day
@khadijahk346820 күн бұрын
Thank you for always bringing Prof Roy. God bless him and protect him. May he educate more people on the truth and unbiased history
@Ozgur72Ай бұрын
09:34 More British soldiers were killed than Anzacs in the Gallipoli Campaign.
@soniavadnjal755328 күн бұрын
I thought the opposite was true.
@Ahrlin928 күн бұрын
@@soniavadnjal7553 Australian / New Zealand casualties: 12000 dead, 22000 wounded. British casualties: 31000 dead, 79000 wounded. The professor in this video is just ignorant/lying on that particular topic. It's a shame as most of the video is pretty accurate.
@admiral2005528 күн бұрын
around 200 k but they keep hidin as 50 to 90 k
@Tiglath-PileserXIX25 күн бұрын
Complete waste of lives. The British were BAMBOOZLED into joining WW1 and got their colonies to contribute lives to their mistake.
@omurcinarelci514811 күн бұрын
Listening to Prof. Cassandra never tires. ❤
@TheKeithvidz28 күн бұрын
splitting people or joining them against their will, Imperialism 101.
@dougmorrow74628 күн бұрын
Oh, for God's sake... that's what almost every single empire has done since the beginning of time. And the British weren't any worse than any other conquering force, they just followed the same template. And as for the "people's will," sati (burning a widow on her husband's funeral pier) was the people's will before the British came along.
@TheKeithvidz28 күн бұрын
@@dougmorrow746 i won't dignify u.
@chrisfreebairn87028 күн бұрын
@TheKeithvidz why not, his point is valid? You think the will of the ppl has ever been the organising principle of humanity? If you do chances are you're under 30 & know nothing of history. Do you deny that the self righteous view you express can only exist bc of the victory of Western enlightenment ideals over those that created & sustained such barbaric practices as female genital mutilation, human sacrifice & slavery?
@gibby991927 күн бұрын
@@TheKeithvidz Please do, he made a half decent point. Britain did nothing different but were the best at it.
@TheKeithvidz27 күн бұрын
@@gibby9919 pass those thoughts to the Palestenians.
@louisnel59296 күн бұрын
Not surprising given the killings & appalling treatment of the indigenous people by British Empire when they 'ruled' India
@mikemhz25 күн бұрын
My family fought in Gallipoli alongside Aussies as an English man. So saying the British just used Australians as expendibles was inaccurate and slanderous.
@richardforster539424 күн бұрын
True. As an Australian I grew up with the impression that Gallipoli was all Australian and NZ troops, but I was reading up on this recently and was surprised that many more of the troops deployed were from the British isles...
@codingstyle948023 күн бұрын
Yes, British used the Australians as expendables.
@vincentjohnson376323 күн бұрын
@@codingstyle9480 Silly statement the Aussies were British
@codingstyle948023 күн бұрын
@@vincentjohnson3763 Yes, I know. They were the criminals and convicts from the UK.
@mikemhz22 күн бұрын
@codingstyle9480 my great uncle's territorial regiment, in which he was an NCO, was combined with what the Aussies brought to both France and Gallipoli. I don't know the ratio of forces or deaths but both engagements were mostly disastrous due to the general incompetence of British generals giving "over-the-top" orders into machine gun fire. All the lads suffered, and I don't want my family and those local regiments forgotten.
@christophermcanally1246Ай бұрын
The thing about Casagranda is that he never lets the facts get in the way of a good story. For example the Germans had already given up on the naval race in the years before WWI.
@stephenchappell7512Ай бұрын
I get you but he's just setting the background of how things came to be
@mikev462127 күн бұрын
They had hundreds of U boots
@christophermcanally124626 күн бұрын
@ they only really started building out the u boat fleet after the war started. They only had 48 or so built or under construction before the war. The arms race was for surface fleets.
@mikev462126 күн бұрын
@@christophermcanally1246 Fair enough- I wasn't around at the time : )
@John-vz5un23 күн бұрын
Still basically a good podcast. Reminiscent of Oil grabs in Lebanons coast Presently. When I was in college during the beginning of our oil Wars , I wrote a short article taking off on Lawrence of Arabia using a stick to carve a line in the sand partitioning off the tip of Iraq which is the reason that the Border of Kuwait is a random squiggle.
@careyrowland23 күн бұрын
Thanks for the excellent history discussion. Keep them coming.
@geraudonly6229Ай бұрын
It might seem that a Turkish state was inevitable after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire but Attaturk really created a unique nation state out of the Muslim population of Asia minor and the Muslim refugees from the Balkans and Caucasus. It was not inevitable but a great feat of statesmanship unique in the middle East. Not even the ancient histories of Egypt and Iran could create such a strong nation state like he did with Turkey.
@stephenchappell7512Ай бұрын
He just had the foresight to make it happen remembering that the Armistice of Mudros had left the remaining Ottoman armies in Anatolia and Armenia intact (with Armenia already having been emptied of its people anyhow) His genius was knowing his sides strength and weaknesses and acting on it
@DD-fe2xw29 күн бұрын
There was nothing very special about ata turk , given the ottoman was huge empire . It's similar to British securing little island after the british empire fell. Worst part is British drew the lines of ottoman empire .
@ScythianMassagets29 күн бұрын
@@DD-fe2xw stop talk
@arifmunshi683329 күн бұрын
the sauds and ataturk will be cursed for breaking up the ummah. The muslims will unite again.
@chrisfreebairn87028 күн бұрын
Either way he'd not be happy with the modern trend away from secularism ..
@stevenpiehl619923 күн бұрын
The good professor is an amazing speaker so easy to understand. It makes history a lot of fun. I love the in-depth dives he takes.
@arielbenjamin325323 күн бұрын
People love to pretend there was something exceptional about sykes-picot. Allies dividing the territory & property of the conquered has been the reality of every coalition military victory ever, for better or worse.
@nedolelkheir550823 күн бұрын
I’m Australian and love Aussies and really like you my friend
@GrapheneWarrior26 күн бұрын
This interview is total non sense. I will point to several major historical mistakes this so called expert has made in this interview. 1- The British did not make Kuwait a British protectorate in 1899 because of oil, indeed oil was not discovered in Kuwait until 1938. Kuwait was made a British protectorate to prevent the Germans from using it as a terminus for the Berlin Baghdad railway. 2- World War I did not start because of oil and certainly not because Germany built a new modern navy, WWI was mostly a continental war and the only time the British and the French used their navies was when they attacked the Dardanelles and that campaign resulted in a humiliating defeat for the allies. 3- The most laughable thing I heard in this interview is that Russia was going to invade the northern part of Persia and Great Britain the southern part, the only problem with statement is that Russia and Britain divided Persia in 1907 as part of the Anglo-Russian Convention and Russia was already in control of the northern part of Persia and England was in control of the southern part, so why would England and Russia invade territories they already control?. The rest of this interview is so full of historical inconsistencies and errors that make me wonder what college awarded this fake professor a Doctorate degree?
@vincentjohnson376323 күн бұрын
Thank you for your contribution
@oml81mm19 күн бұрын
This interview is indeed nonsense. The gentleman interviewed certainly knows his history, but interprets it incorrectly.
@johnmoran153718 күн бұрын
Roy Casablanca is a nincompoop. I think 18 year olds are impressed but then they grow up
@Heartstone-h8y17 күн бұрын
Your comment echoes another comment I made, but you've provided even more historical references that I did to debunk this nonsense. Have you noticed how many of these left-wing ideologue / pseudo-historians are promoted by the KZbin algorithms these days? And the Redditors and Breadtubers lap it up and regurgitate it as 'fact'.
@stephenchappell7512Күн бұрын
@GrapheneWarrior I can tell by the name you give yourself that you're the sort who only deals in facts 👍
@judyyee416324 күн бұрын
Thank you, Professor. Very interesting. This carving of other folks' lands is coming to an end. Thank you, for this interview.
@HistoryOfRevolutionsАй бұрын
3:41 The British began drilling for oil in Iran way before this deal. They made a deal with the local Sheikh of Khuzestan (Sheikh Khaz'al Al Ka'bi). 6:38 Yes they did and they were very quick to undermine it. For example, one of the first things the British did when they entered Damascus is they removed the newly elected Mayor of the city (Muhammad Said Al Jazairi) and replaced him with a british puppet.
@elisacali779427 күн бұрын
Someone has to explain to Casagranda that the Ottoman Empire was not inhabited only by Arabs. He just doesn't understand what an empire is ...
@davidwright843228 күн бұрын
I knew of Sykes-Picot. But none of the deep history of the Arabian peninsula! Many thanks for this very informative video. It's a strange and compelling tale!
@omarjette385929 күн бұрын
At last, an explanation of how the situation led to today.
@soniavadnjal755328 күн бұрын
About time. Been hidden or white-washed long enough. But they've been manoeuvring events and people more recently haven't they? Libya, Iraq,
@Aslaan13 күн бұрын
To divide conquer & get oil
@seang301927 күн бұрын
Pedantic correction: the Gallipoli campaign used Australian and New Zealand forces as shock troops and they played a significant part in the Dardanelles campaign. Their numbers and losses were lower, however, than those of the British, French and Indian troops. This is not to say that the British generals had little regard for the ANZACs. It's probable they had as little or little more for their own troops and even less for the Indians. Secondly: who tf doesn’t like Australians?? 🤷♀️
@BarryOLaith-m8e25 күн бұрын
New Zealanders, and Billy Connelly.
@seang301925 күн бұрын
@BarryOLaith-m8e Kiwis love Aussies. They're just afraid to admit it.
@Tiglath-PileserXIX25 күн бұрын
Aussies and Kiwis were the proverbial LIONS let by DONKEYS (the Brits).
@stephenchappell7512Күн бұрын
@seang3090 👍😁
@annembury318129 күн бұрын
Splendid report! Thank you!
@mjtonyfireАй бұрын
Nobody likes an imperial superpower.
@PikeBishop129 күн бұрын
Those damn Persians, Mongols, Arab Caliphates, Ottomans, Japanese.. oh wait, you probably just mean European I bet.
@viaqwerty813728 күн бұрын
@@PikeBishop1, Indeed their crimes dont count- then, or now
@PikeBishop128 күн бұрын
@@viaqwerty8137 I mean they weren't even considered crimes until recent history and it was the Europeans that even brought that and human rights into being. Amazing how backwards everything is.
@AmunRaa28 күн бұрын
@@PikeBishop1they just hate Europeans and europe I'm not even European but I had enough lying about how everyone was peaceful except Europeans. Most of the comments think the middle east was heaven before Europeans came
@gokayguner58772 күн бұрын
As a Turk, I would like to ask you this; You divided our empire by divide and rule and took our lands from us, was the result better? What He Took From Us World War I broke out in the Balkans (+ 1st and 2nd Balkan Wars, Serbian-Bosnian War) and the 1st World War led to the 2nd. North Africa and Crimea turned into a bloodshit. 1.5 million people died in the Algerian War of Independence alone. Stability has not been achieved in the Middle East even today. All of this is just so that you Westerners can become more richer. Sometimes I can't stop ask myself, Are You Barbarians or Are We?
@jondickinson286428 күн бұрын
More Brits died than Australians at Gallipoli, so they just 'using' Australians and NZ'ers. I suspect this guy is not impartial.
@Patriarchy_6927 күн бұрын
He isn't.
@Tiglath-PileserXIX25 күн бұрын
Regardless, the Australians were the proverbial LIONS led by DONKEYS (the Brits).
@hang324Ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing this interview. Love the story telling.
@KimseKimsesiz1948Ай бұрын
Mehmet Ali is not Albanian, he was a Turkish Pasha ( General Governor)
@Mohammed-ps2gu29 күн бұрын
Ataturk is a crypto jeew
@خلیج_فارس28 күн бұрын
What was hes nationality
@mrgear547425 күн бұрын
Mehmet Ali or Muhamed Ali is albanian and his mother language was albanian. He welcomed also the albanian king Ahmet Zogu in Egypt when dictatorship came in albania after ww2
@ersgtr342125 күн бұрын
Still Turkish. There are Turks with Albanian heritage estimated to be over 5 million people but they are baked into society.
@kizgintosbaga24 күн бұрын
@@ersgtr3421 i am turk and no they are not turkish. as far as an average turk concerned he was the guy divided the empire. hayatınız devşirme totosu yıkamakla geçiyor.
@dorothychambless463723 күн бұрын
this is the best!!! Such an interesting and informed storyteller!
@MuipalАй бұрын
Skye-Peko project failed to achieve three countries in their original plan and one of the country it created differently than they thought. Syke-Peko agreement supposed to create an Alawite state in western Syria north of Lebanon, a Druze state with Homs as capital and a Kurdish state in north of Iraq. The first two had no buyers from the respective communities.lebanon supposed to be a third of what is today Lebanon primarily consisting of northern Christian majority Lebanon but it ended up with non-Christian districts and also many Greek Orthodox Arabs never had any interest in religious nationalism and rather associated themselves with Arab nationalism.
@ZhanetaPetroskaАй бұрын
Sykes picot treaty
@ZhanetaPetroskaАй бұрын
London treaty 1828 Paris London treaty 1928
@Tan92lfc8 күн бұрын
Cairo was the center of Islamic academia, not Saudi
@nl5828Ай бұрын
strange how on british “remembrance sunday”, the british establishment and their subservient subjects never remember any of this history that has a direct lineage to today’s conflicts in the middle east!
@gibby991927 күн бұрын
You know remembrance sunday covers the loses from all British military actions, including that of the middle east and those who volunteered to fight alongside the British
@jujutrini841226 күн бұрын
How do you know what the British subjects remember?
@gibby991926 күн бұрын
@@jujutrini8412worst rage bait however I will indulge you. It isn’t the subject remembering it’s Britain remembering and thanking the sacrifices the subjects made to help maintain freedom not just in Europe but the world.
@jujutrini841226 күн бұрын
@ Why are you acting like I asked you that question when it’s very clear that I am asking the OP this question precisely because the OP stated that British subjects “never remember any of this history”?
@gibby991926 күн бұрын
@@jujutrini8412 rage bait used to be believable
@AS-bm5xv26 күн бұрын
I knew bits and pieces about this Makes a lot more sense given the context
@الحمدللهربالعالمين-ش4دАй бұрын
Yes, my dear brothers, my beloved Palestine is the cradle of Christianity and Judaism, and it contains Al-Aqsa, the third holiest place for us Muslims in Palestine. Bethlehem, the cradle of Christ, is a blessed land, and it is the holy land, and it has been our land for tens of thousands of years, and it is the land of the Canaanite Arabs, the original Palestinian people, and they have lived in it since the Islamic conquest in the era. The Umayyad, Abbasid and Ottoman Arabs, Muslims, Christians and Jews are like brothers and neighbors under Palestinian rule to the owners of the land, but the Zionists came and the British occupation brought them to our land as compensation to the Jews for what they did to them Hitler. The question here is that who did the Holocaust, the Germans, why do I, the Palestinian Arab, pay the price? Why not Germany? Why do I, the Muslim, pay the price for crimes? Committed by the Germans and Nazi Europe, fascism is the root of all evil in the world. Our problem is the occupation🙏Palestine is an area of more than 27 thousand square kilometers and is on the borders of Egypt and Jordan, which historically is part of Palestine and the people of Jordan, more than 70 percent of whom are of Palestinian origin, but Britain made them a state and brought agents to the Jordanian ruling dynasty in order to rule Jordan and protect the occupation from the Jordanian-Palestinian people Palestine Its capital, Jerusalem, is the land of the Palestinian people for tens of thousands of years. It is the cradle of Christianity and Judaism, and it is the third holiest place for us Muslims. It is a land where most of God’s prophets lived, were born, and died. It is the holy and blessed land and the land of the Palestinian and Arab people. Muslims, Jews, and Christians lived there for thousands of years as neighbors and brothers before the Zionists occupied our land. Britain brought them in the Balfour Declaration to occupy our land. Those who committed the Holocaust against the Jews were the Germans and the West, not me.🙏🙏🙏القدس عربية
@billfarley916727 күн бұрын
You forgot to mention the Zionists were purchasing Palestinian land for cash in the early 1900's. And the Palestinians were gladly selling to them because it was nothing but desert sand to the locals. Actually they thought it was amusing that the stupid Jews were buying nothing but sand. This was the beginning of the overall Zionist plan to reinstate the original land of Israel as promised by God. When all this purchased "sand" began to bloom because the Jews were cultivating/irrigating it, the Palestinians wanted it back. When The Balfour Declaration was activated the Jewish population in Palestine began to swell, more purchased land was cultivated and the area blossomed. After WWll and the Holocaust, thousands of Jews were struggling to get to the "promised land," supported both politically and monetarily by the Zionists. In 1947 the UN voted to create the State of Israel which made them a legal entity. And the fight has been ongoing ever since. I struggle to support the fact that Palestinian people were a separate entitly and have always lived in the region. My reading indicates these people were a conglomerate of folks who filtered into the region after the fall of Israel by Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BCE. Their claim that they've always been there is false. The Israelis simply want their land to represent the original land base promised and given to them by God. I have a probelm with that and hope the Israelis and Palestinians can find a suitable compromise. I'm not holding my breath.
@mikev462127 күн бұрын
Not quite "tens of thousands of years" : )
@sukrancingoz93346 күн бұрын
Gerçek tamamen farklı. Holikost'u Almanlar yaptı gibi gorunmesinin aksine madalyonun tersine baktığımız an gerçek bu değil... İhale Almanlar'a kaldı...
@gozitan527 күн бұрын
Great historical presentation. Thanks
@robertdavis100Ай бұрын
big wars are always fought for big empires at their end, 7 year war was 1st globally fought war where spain and britain swapped positions. same for ww2, big goals big battles, us and uk swapped places. alex and persia ushered in the Hellenic era
@madharry679227 күн бұрын
Thank you Roy for capturing 100s of years history in about 15 mins. I wonder if there is brief history of the world in audio by you?
@wa1-marketing95523 күн бұрын
When he says, "the British are like that..." He means the Jewish Bankers who supplied CREDIT to the Victorian Oligarchs, who ran the industry of the era...so it was a Union of the Snakes... The British people were just ordinary folk who were industrious, but moral but also naively merely followed orders. (a bit like Germans a century later)...Lions led by Jackals.
@edus963621 күн бұрын
Nothing has changed. The City of London still reigns supreme.
@FrithonaHrududu0212723 күн бұрын
This guy is insanely entertaining beside knowledgeable
@berghoff259314 күн бұрын
Sykes and Picot in my considered opinion, must be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, applying the same standards by which President Obama was awarded the prize.
@lancesandberg392129 күн бұрын
Didn't the Germans start killing people, because the future ruler of Austria.....a creepy guy who had his gameskeeper release a line of animals, for him to shoot, sort of like you might line up empty cans, for your 5 year old to shoot with rubber arrows..... was assassinated in Sarajevo? (the difference between your 5 year old, & this archduke, of course, being that your 5 year old must develop a skill, whereas the archduke was just pulling the trigger to shoot an endless line of large animals).
@moc502214 күн бұрын
Every hamlet in Australia has memorials to Gallipoli invaders, the Aussies really loved the English and felt 2nd class to them
@stephenchappell7512Күн бұрын
Don't believe the hype, with most of those landing in Gallipoli being Brits from the Home Islands (as were most fatalities)
@artbyandrewАй бұрын
That’s exactly what I’ve always thought and I’ve never heard anyone else say it before
@katej3z71519 күн бұрын
Brit here. First, Gallipoli: the loss of Australian troops was a tragedy. Churchill was involved, trying to live up to his famous ancestor but half American. He expressed regrets for the losses, which included a Brigade from Sandringham. The Aussies were not somehow secondary. To ordinary Brits they were heroic, whilst Gallipoli was a mess. Most British Govts have a habit of prioritising the wealth of elite groups & just dealing with the population. There is a gap between the two, vastly aided by censored media after news about the foul-ups suffered by the Light Brigade went out undoctored. Really oddly (to me) Thatcher either reined this back or a hostile media determined to use its power. A tiny core % of the UK were behind the Iraq war, the media & the Govt misled the Public and off we went. (Same Fear tactics with Brexit). Count the News items about Gaza on main channels British news. The coverage lags behind cute pets. Britain is becoming a democracy in name only. Our history, I cannot change. We started to make progress with some apologies but that cooled. Immense wealth of a very small elite is content to see an SBS veteran in battle related difficulties was left homeless, sofa surfing and eating 3 times a wk from a food bank (he rationed 'to help families'). Being invaded is not the risk, a takeover happened whilst we were sleeping. Time to clean up our Democracy. Step 1: the Special Relationship with the US. Dream on. Apart from engineering the Cold War together at the end of WW2 (people were killed whilst the US & UK govts plotted US Post war dominance), the UK govt deludes itself. Our Govts are reduced to useful mugs. Worse, they know it.
@stephenchappell7512Күн бұрын
Great comment 👍
@DanielGarcia-nq1buАй бұрын
Peace be unto you 7 comments 56 view?! Wow Dr. Casagranda is one amongst the most important thinkers, historical data petaflop drive with arms and legs like a super hard drive with data conveying processor and a critical thought engager, with movable parts! Common mee I like you guys but I love the Doc, his classes at that school I don't want to give them free plug, but Doc casa so necessary that I believe he should have his own space on line not you tube his own space with his own domain so he controls it with his familia and I pray he and his family are from amongst the companions of the paradise as well as all of you guys at mee from you host to the English founder to the guy sweeping the floor at your offices, peace be unto you and hey doc there's love for your here From the south BRONX NY The New Al Fandalus The land of the VANDALS.........
@ArYan-fx3tyАй бұрын
by noooo way he is a top academic, half of what he says is psudo history. check his academic background.
@fatihakmese15 күн бұрын
Mehmed Ali Pasha did not invaded Egypt. He was already there while Napoleon invaded, he was part of Bashibozuk (irregular militia) after Napoleon left he became what we called ring leader (responsible around 200 soldiers) and he served under two mayors (hursit pasha and husrev pasha) for his success he was awarded to become mayor of egypt… his invasion of crete was an order from Sultan… (to get rid of Russian backed greeks) his march to anatolia was due to misaggrement, he wanted his son to become mayor of Damascus but court convinced sultan not to… he marched after his son is denied while Ottomans at war with Russia… Mehmed Ali Pasha in 1845 returned back to Istanbul and pledge fealty to Sultan again. It was a internal political struggle of Ottoman empire, not invasion or conquest.
@Peace-r5b22 күн бұрын
I love to listen this guy he is very honest and smart
@pubgexecutive7276Ай бұрын
Missing from your title….”BADLY “, like they did in soooo many other places. 🧐
@sparks7949Ай бұрын
Free Palestine ❤
@Dimension8226 күн бұрын
Roy Casagranda is a great and wonderful human being
@ejasem126 күн бұрын
In 1917 the oil wasn’t discovered in Arabian region
@leobelleobel200715 күн бұрын
no oil is already had been discovered. in middle east
@Artus1845-gh9pd13 күн бұрын
"when the United States did this , did that" , notice how he talks about it as if he is not American ! Dude it is your country, it is you, collectively, who is responsible!
@dennisash722125 күн бұрын
If you read about Sykes and Picot you will realize that they are a couple of insignificant people of the time, they had little to no impact on the outcome of the borders. Also imposing modern interpretation on historical events is the classical mistake that amateurs make.
@StreaminDigital24 күн бұрын
Fascinating interview!!!
@stephenthomas817827 күн бұрын
Oh dear what rubbish. Again too general and at best sketchy. ‘The Brits didn’t care because they were killing Australians at Gallipoli?’ This is an example of this guy’s bile motivated bad history. FFS the British lost more men in Turkey than any other colonial country in that campaign… doesn’t figure does it? The truth is that all British Empire decisions were under the scrutiny of a democratic government - so not ideal by any judgement of today - but far more measured and considered than the terrible country as described by this High School historian.
@a.y.y.532727 күн бұрын
The British suck so much it's unreal. English men who died at Gallipoli were invaders - and your "democratic" government is literally a tool for colonialism, applying human rights only to the white christian and not their millions of Indian sepoys who deserved far far better than savage English rule
@christopherwalton137321 күн бұрын
I enjoy retrospectively applying my sense of moral superiority over people from the past. Look how virtuous I am !
@gambaridup26 күн бұрын
The Arab people should stop blaming Picot, Sykes, Balfour and on things which happened more than 100 years ago.
@Tiglath-PileserXIX25 күн бұрын
Likewise, the Brits should stop kowtowing to the descendants of their German monarchs. While they are at it, Brits should stop celebrating their CULTURE and admit all the foreign immigrants. You obvioulsy do not believe in history.
@troiscarottes29 күн бұрын
Now this is really interesting !
@Motorfreek1969Ай бұрын
It started ad 1917!!!!
@octaviodovalle655026 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@aemilorАй бұрын
The Albanian general was called Ali Pasha Tepelena :)... big thumbs up for Prof. Casagranda
@braveforeverАй бұрын
Jo o Pirro e ke gabim. Nuk eshte Ali pashe tepelena. Ky profesori po flet per nje tjeter mehmet ali pasha eshte tjeter. Mos e ngaterro me Ali pashe tepelenen