Mike O'Sullivan: The end of globalization (and the beginning of something new) | TED

"Globalization is on its deathbed," says economist Mike O'Sullivan. The question now is: What's next? Tracing the historical successes and failures of globalization, O'Sullivan forecasts a new world order where countries come together over shared values rather than geography. Learn how big regional powers like the United States and China will be driven by distinct ways of governing trade, technology and people -- while smaller nations will forge new alliances to solve problems.
Visit TED.com to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more.
The TED Talks channel features the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes (or less). Look for talks on Technology, Entertainment and Design -- plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. You're welcome to link to or embed these videos, forward them to others and share these ideas with people you know.
Follow TED on Twitter: / tedtalks
Like TED on Facebook: / ted
Subscribe to our channel: / ted
TED's videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (or the CC BY - NC - ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy (www.ted.com/ab.... For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at media-requests...

[@mixerD1-]

The most shared value in the world...greed.

[@olafcreed4726]

Because its so much easier to be a pessimist.

[@smartcatcollarproject5699]

Greed, jealousy, lust for pleasure and domination... that's where we all come from, our common denominator. Cooperation, intelligence, empathy, on the other hand, are much less common, and even if you have these good graces, you better not deny reality - and your own reality, else it will come back to bite you in the @ss like a sneaky b@st@rd...

[@lucastop5660]

mixer: speak for your own civilization!.not all civilization is based on greed like the ones in the west.

[@Latvialainen]

byproduct of scarcity that exists because of competition based economy.

[@aquious953]

People are beginning to view their "leaders" as a hostile occupying force.

[@cherylmcelveen2817]

You mean recognizing them as such...

[@joncrane7661]

@@cherylmcelveen2817 yes, and its about time. Nothing like life to educate

[@joncrane7661]

@HMS Blackprice blame the media. Not the people. Whomever owns the media owns perception

[@theyredistortingyourrhthym126]

1 year & 1 month later 0 covID deaths Northern Territory - population 250K - 1.421 million km² (area discriminator) Australia Aboriginal Australians (indigenous discriminator) pregnant mums (gender discriminator) school children (age discriminator) Cambodia - population 16 million (border discriminator) 0 virus

[@cheshirecat6519]

Something new like the Road to Corporate Tyranny and the end of Liberty.

[@unclejohn4528]

“More for me, less for thee”.... the rich have capitalized on this mess and will not take their foot off our neck until we have had it or until they have it all...

[@BEDLAMITE-5280ft.]

I want cyber implants. For the corporate wars.

[@rypadrid]

Something new like total exploitation of natural resources from small economically thriving countries. Imperialism I guess. white supremacist. Haha The US will continue its military bases in some asean countries. Haha

[@jomo2483]

Yep.

[@DigitalArtisan77]

Hahah didnt you notice that happen already 🤣 or how else would you know of its existence....unless you are a tyrant JK 🤣🤣🤣...🧐

[@yanliu6093]

Assata Shakur: "Nobody in the world. Nobody in history, has ever gotten their freedom by appealing to the moral sense of the people who were oppressing them."

[@TheJeremyKentBGross]

What about Ghandi? And Martin Luther King? It's possible. But only if the people in power have morals to appeal to, atm clearly they don't. Or perhaps we just have not keyed in on which morals of theirs we are capable of appealing to. Maybe it's some of both.

[@aeronnecoronel2802]

There's no morality left in the hearts of Greedy and selfish men drunk with power.

[@TiimelessTales]

Agreed

[@sivasidhamalli2199]

@@TheJeremyKentBGross The British PM who supported freedom for India said the British left India when they were afraid that the 2.5 million Indian soldiers were demobilized and were ready to regroup to throw out the British. Look up the information about how Indian soldiers took over Bombay Naval Dockyard before Independence. Gandhi had utterly failed and his last half hearted attempt was the Quit India movement in 1942 which wad crushed by the British. They didn't have an urgent need to leave till they realized the danger 100,000 British faced from 2.5 million battle hardened veterans.

[@TheJeremyKentBGross]

@@sivasidhamalli2199 I don't know anything about that. But at least the one close British friend I had, who was ex military, had very high estimates of Ghandi, and seemed to think he won by using the Britishs own morality against them by putting them in positions of illegitimate hypocrisy. On the other hand, similar tonwhat you said, MLKJ was balanced by Malcolm X, so maybe you need a good cop and a bad cop.

[@johnnytsunami4186]

Translation: "if your values differ from ours, you'll be frozen out of the new system."

[@thirtythree680]

If your values are different to New Zealanders, maybe you should be. They're lovely, empathetic people who are doing better with Covid than anywhere in the world.

[@lchpdmq]

@@thirtythree680 they are fearful and authoritarian idiots who destroyed the lives of those working people in their tourist industry and will have screwed themselves when they open up and haven’t been exposed to new forms of various pathogens for a year, and when covid mutates they will have to shut down again.

[@nescius2]

@@lchpdmq that's a nuanced view, but if you want to spew that kind of arguments with idiots in it, please contribute to discussion with silence :)

[@williamrbuchanan4153]

Look out NZ they will not let you be alone!

[@renzodandrea6469]

Hello Thomas, I see differently. This is not an exclusive framework. The role that we have to embrace is an integrative approach towards value systems. Of course, in some countries, values cannot adhere for historical reasons. However, we need to build a collaborative awareness that comes from new interactions and learning experience, at business level and social level. These two are interwined now. Finally, I don t see a system. It is an ecosystem that we need to enable by taking action and listening.

[@juliancoulden1753]

The optimism of this presentation is admirable but its based on conjecture and hope. Huge swathes of middle America lie destitute because jobs went global, leaving behind poverty and complete destruction of cities and whole communities which relied on those jobs. They went because of corporate greed, wages were cheaper and more profit could fall to the bottom line. Nothing has rebuilt those cities or communities. The same has happened in the UK and in the EU. Made in Germany once the apogee of quality and reliance, is now made in China. Small comfort for those whose jobs have vanished, along with complete industry’s. Globalisation didn’t address these issues. And that’s what people on the ground care about

[@raptango_na6199]

Dude. Exactly true. If only everyone saw it this way

[@david88va]

I think you're missing the central theme of globalization as your comment is spoken from the point of view of a city or town thats lost jobs. From that singular view point, globalization is bad bc it took from you and gave elsewhere. From a global standpoint, or a point of view not from any specific geographical point, there was simply a transfer of jobs from a richer area to a poorer area and both the loser of jobs and the gainer are now closer to the some equilibrium. All that aside, this only refers to the transfer of jobs, not corporate greed like CEOs and capitalists increasing their wealth drastically more than their employees

[@williamrbuchanan4153]

Yes it’s true, parasitic system of no Ethical reasoning.

[@raptango_na6199]

@@david88va hes not missing the central theme of globalization. Hes talking about the cost of globalization. Youre talking about the benefits as if the costs dont matter. They do matter. "There was simply a transfer" of jobs? Uh...understatement of the year. How many jobs? Almost 4 million. Whose jobs? American jobs. Who did this? US elected officials with trade deals and trade policy. Did we vote for this? No. Then why did they do it? Because politicians consider corporations to be constituents even though they dont vote...but they do contribute huge campaign donations....ooOOOhhh. i see. But wait ...you got cheap TVs! Globalization is good for you! Shouldn't i get to decide whats good for me? No youre just an ignorant blue collar worker that needs to be retrained. Uh...i disagree.

[@david88va]

@@raptango_na6199 I'm not talking about either the benefits nor costs of globalization. I'm saying the video is about globalization dying from a global perspective. The loss of American jobs isn't a "cost" to other countries. The fact that you're talking about American jobs is irrelevant to the Polish or the Nigerians because they didn't benefit from American jobs, they benefit from jobs in their country. My point is that this particular video is about globalization from the point of view of global trends, NOT from a cost benefit analysis for a specific county.

[@siddharthbanerjee2816]

Turned out to be more of an opinion rather than facts.

[@GreenMorningDragonProductions]

Not even that. More like a fervent but deluded hope.

[@hootarosetagaya5570]

Disappointed in a min.

[@PrabhakarKrishnamurthyprof]

I disagree with you. It is just not economics only. It is one of the finest lecture on new form fo world order.

[@smartcatcollarproject5699]

In fact with the Covid crisis it's about MORE globalization, look how the GAFA and Uber eat are the great winners, while local business are forced to close with these lockdown policies...

[@unclejohn4528]

Always is.... either way, they’re not letting up until they’ve milked it dry....

[@brianbourquin7178]

So many statements that don’t tie together!

[@kennarajora6532]

exactly what I was thinking. I thought I was going to get some complicated reasoning, but instead just got a bunch of catchy statements.

[@jcleary1945]

That's the world for ya

[@privatprivat7279]

if u believe and actively participated in the world and economy's that humanity created untill today. it will take time for a human like urself to trully grasp many of these statements (if u came of age and haid a relative happy life u probably never will.just praise urself happy and be proud)... because to me u, (correct me if i am wrong) u sound to me to be a succesfull human being today... in the world of today.... u need to se hes statements as a dream... its like a dream... a vision for humanity... and a dream can come true....remain a dream...or turn into a nightmare... what i believe to be truth is that...we are approaching our next transition of our human evolution(this will happen ANYWAY)...and to acomplish this, MANY things needs to change... ESPECIALLY if we wont want it to happen without many casualties....(always the poor and the weak in evry society and economy's we are forced to live in,is proven that true history those people being the victims of such changes) and a global resession is exactly what man like these try to avoid... from happening again... u are now living in VERRY exciting times for humanity! but fear, peopl's understandable ignorance, is what fails u from seing this... try to seek awnsers.... and try to tie together the statements that dont tie together.... if u are in a stage and mindset of ur life that WANTS and SEEKS to know... otherwise enjoy ur life just as it is! (me saying this extualy is bad... because it only makes humans more confused scared....) if i did that to u... i am sorry! and just believe that i am crazy! love from belgium,and i wish u all the best!

[@lawrence1369]

I get the same feeling. Also the examples (countries) seems to be cherry picked and labeled without any care about their complexities.

[@argasyargasy2366]

He speaks like a liberal in lala land.

[@srinivasams9323]

Globalisation : You are having a better life than a king few centuries back Also Globalisation : You are having debt more than a king.

[@charlykhan2715]

Dead to globalist Soros and company . And the high tech Dictator's Dead to c.c.p XITLER

[@jwadaow]

@HMS Blackprice It's not logical at all. People live better lives because of deflation. Most debt is mortgages because the government has an incentive to keep inflating the price of property. The involvement of government and concomitant prevention of a free market is what makes the system socialist. In a socialist system you have to keep paying the government even when you don't need it any more. That is what you wanted.

[@AAron-gr3jk]

unlike kings of old: Here's some more credit! please spend it, for the system to work.

[@abram730]

Globalization : You have a lower standard of living than you had every year before, because government regulated capitalism was better for the 99%.

[@Solid_Snake99]

Globalization: China and Russia will nuke your country soon

[@sabinesa08]

Some people have played "Monopoly" too long and started playing with real money at WallStreet. They got bigger and started playing with the big boys at the WEF in Davos, met even richer people and are now dreaming of a dictators life.

[@antisocialdistancing3]

They are all enabling & implementing this current international communist lockdown 0 virus Millions AWAKE

[@yesbhugwa2305]

Hello The BRICS Is Now Incharge Of The Planet

[@ΓεώργιοςΜπάρας]

With that way the central bankers with the Governors play monopoly against national foundings of each country and they deep into bankrupt last 50 years...Everything's fixed..Ohh and with the labels..they just use them for moral connection with us we have to see real democracy from the age of Pericles at Athens..that thing we witnessing now has nothing to do with democracy..

[@tp8095]

If you want to know what is happening next, read Orwell or Huxley.

[@immanny85]

Two very very different fictional stories.

[@ps6285]

Even simpler, just go back in time to the 30s, in europe. The dots all fit together.

[@amritsingh4251]

I doubt you will get the same situation that was presented in 1984.

[@larsstougaard7097]

Don't worry Biden and the vaccine will save us all 😄🥃

[@paulcurran4786]

Stick on some Steve Hughes and laugh at the madness.......i recommend his 'while its still legal' performance, its on utube for handiness.

[@JoeGilson1]

“I am, at the Fed level, libertarian; at the state level, Republican; at the local level, Democrat; and at the family and friends level, a socialist. If that saying doesn’t convince you of the fatuousness of left vs. right labels, nothing will.” ― Nassim Nicholas Taleb, Skin in the game

[@peachypietro9980]

Says someone who apparently doesn't have any skin in the game

[@JoeGilson1]

@@peachypietro9980 If you read his books, you'll understand why he doesn't have much skin in the game.

[@peachypietro9980]

@@JoeGilson1 so why quote it then? Clarify the mental landscape for me here.

[@peachypietro9980]

Are you demonstrating the author of this vlog doesn't have skin in the game? Also, is that even a fair assessment, given his obvious attachment to and enchantment with neoliberalism?

[@JoeGilson1]

@@peachypietro9980 Gated institutions will get bailed out. Individuals will not. Economists and experts are errand boys.

[@keitatsutsumi]

This was such a bizarre tedtalk... so many of his supporting evidence was too vague and even unrelated. Then so many of his claims were almost unrelated to the evidence he was building up with. He just didn’t explain his ideas well OR enough

[@playergamer562]

Maybe you just didnt understand

[@keitatsutsumi]

@@playergamer562 ok “player gamer” lmao

[@W_W-f8y]

Probably due to time constraints

[@monatheblunt794]

It doesn’t matter whether it’s because of time constraints... Ted is known for showcasing innovation, education, and science with proof or personal experiences etc. This talk was interesting... but feels very scrambled. He does give great examples but nothing that we don’t already know about how globalization is evolving.

[@MovieRiotHD]

That is unfortunately half the Ted talks..

[@Lance0714]

Build your own home, make your own clean water, grow your own food make your energy, find ways to help other people. Full time job.

[@bbob288]

Yes, respect. That's pretty much the solution to all our problems.

[@ApLemon]

"Cultivate your own garden.".. well said.

[@lenkalipkova179]

YES. That's it!

[@SpliffyMeister]

You sound just like me...Go back to earth, everything else is an ILLUSION built from some mad man daydreaming of owning the world...they won't win if we just quit the system and take care of ourselves....quit whining to govt and take up responsibility and obligations for ourselves, self sufficient, self reliant, helps you, me, everyone non elite.

[@jackreacher9351]

It will not be allowed by the govt. They will tell you the crops you grow are not up to the standards and you need to purchase only from other facilities which are approved by authorities like FDA. They may even impose living tax just because you're using natural resources. Everything is so ****up.

[@Nimitz_oceo]

Translation,” I really have no idea what the future hold”

[@zomgneedaname]

can't believe this passes for a ted talk these days

[@Kxycxx]

To be fair, nobody really does

[@Moviemaker3119]

This argument is missing so much information that it is terminally flawed.

[@morgangriffitts5272]

It was hard to tell if he was saying anything substantive at all. Like he was speaking in constant lawyer and banker dog whistles haha

[@stevengiji3886]

He is telling of wealth inequality. This guy does not understand economics. Globalization will be increasing every year.

[@kelvinpell4571]

It is a thinly disguised advertisement for global socialism. Praising leaders with socialist leanings and even treating one of them, the disastrous Nicola Sturgeon as a "leader" of a country that doesn't actually exist. Treating the proto-socialist European Union as a model for society and denigrating Britain, Hungary and Poland as being somehow "immoral" for standing up for values of real people, not social pressure groups. It's an insight into how the globalist/socialist mindset actually works and how deluded large numbers of people who buy into this actually are.

[@VidarrKerr]

@@kelvinpell4571 You Nailed It. edit: Except it isn't global socialism, it is global enslavement. "You will own nothing and be happy about it" --Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum.

[@kelvinpell4571]

@@VidarrKerr So, so sad that so many people refuse to even think about this for a moment, let alone apply critical thinking. So many good people going along with it, like animals walking into a slaughterhouse. And yet it is right in front of them.

[@arthurdick9553]

I stopped after 5 mins. What is this doing on TED ? This is someone who talks a lot but says nothing. Purely one mans opinion. A man who is actually telling you that he knows, absolutely what is going to happen throughout the world.

[@Frasweiler]

l agree....the world is is unpredictable... remember most countries are losing populations and there will be need to hire or import labour whatsoever to replace those lost during the pandemic,

[@animaticToshiue]

Because they know, because that's what they are pushing for

[@arthurdick9553]

@@animaticToshiue yes. And “Build Back Better” proves it.

[@carolynshaffer425]

I appreciate Mike O’Sullivan spelling out the choices various nations now have open to them - in terms of values and alliances - without taking a position on what he thinks they should do. He does assume that the current form of globalization is at its end. I agree. The growing wealth gap, the concentration of power within the hands of a small number of massive global corporations, and the rate of resource depletion among many other factors render the current situation unsustainable.

[@borneoman8574]

Good summation of his speech!

[@NibsNiven]

The only time greeps will stop grabbing more wealth for themselves is when there is no more wealth to grab.

[@sandramynard1046]

@@NibsNiven it’s mainly about power the cabal already own everything

[@art-ux5ff]

if you want to get brainwashed by this man, watch it. This man always compared 'western' countries against others, trying to purvey their supremacy when they have done if not worse to their citizens from covid, to protests, to violence in these last few years and give a choice of a duopoly where its citizens think they have free choice,

[@errolflynn2626]

When I here Bill Gates say " We will be having....." "We must do...." "We will..." "We are doing...." Who is we?....Who elected you?

[@unclejohn4528]

When one fancies themself a god, then “we” means he and his subjects or those subjected to him. He sees a world with him standing atop it, with his foot upon its neck. He will stand aside the rest of us on judgement day and it will not be good for him.

[@lawolsten]

What about when this chap says "we", "we will need to" , etc. Or is it double standards?

[@camilacarnevale2152]

When you have that amount of money, you actually own a piece of the world and have more power than many governments, that's for sure

[@unclejohn4528]

@@camilacarnevale2152 Let’s see him buy his way into heaven with all that money. Mark 10:25 It is easier for a camel to go through a needles eye than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. One day, men like gates will throw their money in the streets and beg people to take it but no one will be there to answer his cries. Only judgment awaits him....

[@lawolsten]

@@unclejohn4528 conveniently ignored my remarks.....

[@patricelauverjon2480]

Let's be honest BIGTECH has been ignoring Humanism and this back fires.

[@xpengfangirl7942]

AI is human though, and humans just are stinky an d infected, toxic, etc.

[@tamsheikh]

Yes a lots of responsibility of the silicon valley executives strange when you think what the parents stood for.

[@2Worlds_and_InBetween]

anything made ...:-:-:... can be re made... re purposed... reBuilt...re tasked in any uni verse.d

[@cz8738]

Fascism has many names. Values can change and never settles, it changes the relations of countries as it changes, and peace is in peril. It’s all about money. Pray for mankind.

[@iankclark]

It's all about power ;-)

[@raspberrykissable]

Money is a poor mans currency power is the name of the game unfortunately.

[@dlmalley8639]

GREED is killing us all And the planet.

[@VidarrKerr]

That's why the Small Hats created (and took over) the money "printing" institutions. That ability is Not just Money, it is also Extreme Power. They support this video. Problem, Reaction, Solution.

[@guyincognito5663]

@DrRock a pretty dumb thing to say.

[@sushrutabatsya]

It is fascinating how he avoided mentioning India .

[@virtualvishwam]

True. Seemed a bit too deliberate, especially considering all these Make in India plans...

[@iamhammadnasir]

India would be at the center of this new beginning. Not as how we know it today but as something else.

[@jiahongchen2448]

@@iamhammadnasir Do respect your ambition, but I believe USA will still be the strongest country in the foreseeable future...India or Japan or China, as a Chinese I don’t think any one of us can match USA 😐USA still has the most advanced tech and the strongest army and the strongest soft power and its people still enjoys one of the highest living standards. This is just my person opinion..

[@camilovallejo5024]

@@jiahongchen2448 in my opinion the US already lost most of it's face with Trump, China already won. Look at all the infrastructure they already set in place, one belt one road kinda stuff.

[@terrragza4597]

@@camilovallejo5024 but the one belt one road isn’t complete and it’s not as well put as you think US is in its current downfall and other countries will rise here and there as far as power depends who takes control more than likely China as they have gotten a big grasp within there country not in a good way but still control

[@aleksandaratan]

KZbin is pushing this video because of "shared values" :D

[@4UnlimitedBEing]

@iloveyellow interesting take, I guess. Perhaps the source (TED) is deemed as reliable, but that does not mean the information is. :)

[@nathanchee6949]

@@4UnlimitedBEing qq

[@lespaul6550]

He lost me when he said "billions of people rose out of poverty"... Right

[@RabbiSamGaming]

Im no globalist but world poverty definitely has been reduced to a meager fraction of the 95-98% it was only a century or two ago

[@nescius2]

@@RabbiSamGaming i think this statistic does smell - when you don't have money but you also don't need them because your needs are covered by your community, you are for some reason still considered poor.. when you have 2 dollars a day but don't have any friends who can help, somehow you are not as poor as before..

[@nescius2]

​@HMS Blackprice you clearly don't know how to have discussion without accusing your opponent of being dumb, do you? all i was saying is that poverty cannot just mean amount of dollars per day, but that's how it is measured, does it mean that everyone was poor before 1775?

[@nescius2]

@HMS Blackprice imagine Hawai, having not yet been colonised by the US, they had no $$, were they poor before they met you?

[@nescius2]

​@HMS Blackprice sure, have you seen any statistics about poverty? guess what measure *all of those* use...

[@matthewraden5210]

He offers very little evidence for the “end of globalization.” “Said but not proven.”

[@norsale6176]

Globalization is controlled by the US securing its allies Products to go everywhere, anywhere by sea, but after the afghan war the Americans are now feeling more and more isolated and would likely return to Isolationism, and with the US mass Oil Production, they are becoming more state-reliance, if that happens, Blockades and trade disruption by sea would be easier, for example you live in china, you rely on Middle eastern Oil, but Iran said no, so they can easily Block all Saudi Arabia's oil, Kuwait Iraq, vice versa and everywhere around the world, literally, the only thing that made them overthink attacking ships is the Americans, because America controlled it like an Iron fist but that is no longer like that, Unions will fall, Wars will Start inevitably, Trade disruption by sea is so easy, and so hard to stop, that it took France to invade whole Algeria JUST to stop Pirates from disrupting trade in Mediterranean sea, now imagine if it's a scale of a whole country, Trade by Air isn't reliable, and trade by Land is not also, looks like all our products that come from china, most oil exports imports, all will gone, rare handful of countries are self-reliant, We're going backwards and most likely to happen in the few upcoming years, the US is most likely to retreat from the Middle east next year, like they did in Afghanistan

[@Shockeyeone]

Hold onto your wallets, sounds like they are coming for the middle class once again.

[@davidpereira9058]

God I hope not... just got here and it took almost all my physical and mental wellbeing to get here! Never been more in favour of taxing the super rich and nationalisation(can't believe I just said this) like am today.

[@dowdyster1]

That is exactly what this is. Funny how the ruling class never want to use their own money for these social experiments

[@williamrbuchanan4153]

Get rid of wallets, you’ll be chipped for you right to live or thrive.

[@davidpereira9058]

@@williamrbuchanan4153 could you elaborate please?

[@stephenbriddon2796]

I’m used to it. It’s the price of comfort.

[@markdenney4938]

I'm not an economist who taught at Princeton, in any event, I don't completely agree with him. The age of globalization was always a hope and perhaps a myth, and some of globalization will probably continue. Google no longer having 30% market share in China (or whatever the figures are) does not signal the end of Globalization. It signals the end of US dominance in a market, perhaps. Mr. O'Sullivan is privileged and is only looking at the "privileged" areas of globalization - such as wealth distribution. We understand the interconnectedness we have as a species, and there have been wins - The fight against ebola, and there is still much progress and much good has come with getting fresh water to the World. For me, the sharing of information is the "crown jewel" of globalization, and it's stress that the more that all of us share information, the more progress, we as a species, shall have.

[@terrythompson7535]

There can be no "we" as a species while use of state power is used and abused to build and defend monopolies, and intentionally lock knowledge and understanding behind financial constraints. There is only the brutal and merciless domination of the rest of us by psychopaths and sociopaths who view us as food, competitors.. and enemies. There is no "we" while our economic objective is the destruction of other people's family businesses by our own. The ruling class does not wish to compete... they wish to win by default. They wish to DEFEAT the rest of us. There is no "we". Nationalism is just to fool the sheep into thinking they are on the same team as the wolves in order to foster them into weakness and complacency.. ..and internationalism intends to make the wolves inescapable..

[@KZ-qn8io]

China communist are even more evil than the Capitalism represent by Biden and Big Tech. Half of the Americian are still indulging in their edge of the past decades exploitating other countries, 90% of Chinese aware of the evilness of the communist party either choose to join them or leave. If Globalization happens in with such an alliance, we, ordinary human can only be slaves. It is not about China and Western, it is about the choice of our human race.

[@terrythompson7535]

@@KZ-qn8io Communism is just capitalism with assigned monopolies.. a caste system..

[@prilep5]

Problem with globalization is that profits are invested in military expenditures and pointless wars

[@slimbroski5335]

I think this guy just liked saying “NeW wOrLd OrDeR.” 🤪

[@MrSabrecat]

He's the NWO's stooge messenger, selling us the idea that we are now in a new world order and that we should all just suck it up and accept it, even if we don't like it! Oh, and don't forget to get your sterilization jab because the Covid disease is going to ravage the world if you don't!

[@GiantRock62]

13 minutes talk of utter nonsense. 😭

[@sabinesa08]

No, no utter nonsense ;-) He is telling us the truth how the New World Order profiteurs see the world and lightly reveal us their upcoming agenda for the silenced sheep.

[@GiantRock62]

@@sabinesa08 I know and that's already backfiring to them..

[@mm3nrx]

based on what evidence? can you supply links? or do you just bullshit to substantiate your argument?

[@sabinesa08]

@@mm3nrx Listen to the sessions of the WEF online congress this week and read the book of Klaus Schwab about the Great Reset.

[@xxxsaraHelloxxx]

@@sabinesa08 the fourth industrial revolution. READ

[@vanessadisco6643]

I love how the comment section is checking this guy trying to act like globalization is good for anyone who isn't already wealthy beyond anything they can spend in a lifetime.

[@liza_lou]

Reductionist, an absolute mess of a thesis.

[@willchen8581]

Whilst I agree with you - aren't you being a bit reductionist in his reductionism? For example a lot of his 'facts' are just simply wrong ... for example to that: Spanish Flu there were NO COLLABORATION amongst any country

[@armstrong.r]

Interesting topic of conversation, but I find it difficult to agree with his perspective.

[@millertas]

Why?

[@chrestonallen647]

I completely agree with you. For instance the whole values based argument... countries already aligned along certain values for decades, this isnt new. « Globalism is dying » is just laughable. And small surface level references to Tunisia, Kenya, Ethiopia, etc fail to truly discuss with any nuance the particular issues each state faces and why any lessons learned in Tunisia would be of benefit to any other nation-state. This video said a lot and yet said nothing to me

[@soobash]

Agree with you. His arguments are shallow. The world is still in the middle of globalisation. Some countries are going in it kicking and crying ( Make xyz great again ???)

[@armstrong.r]

@@millertas For a lot of similar reasons to what Chreston and Soobash mentioned above*, but I won't elaborate further than that as I can't tolerate any more impromptu KZbin arguments. *not below

[@s.a5332]

Isn’t globalization basically the homogenization of markets in the world? So how is it ending?

[@thatwasprettyneat]

I'd like to see this answered as well.

[@Harthorn]

Change the name, product is the same.

[@23Z23]

By everyone trying to get rid of dollar from their reserves.

[@caniblmolstr4503]

@Bob Nonsense. Lay off the Fox news. Globalization is ending simply because America can no longer sustain the globalized market. Markets will get frayed along the lines of China, India, Russia, Eurozone and USA. And by the way the only socialism that now exists is in India and the NOrdic countries. Hardly authoritarian. If anyone is fascist right now it is Trump and has been for some time

[@amorrobel]

@@caniblmolstr4503 That's bc their government has accountability measures. Government in the US has no such thing.... Social programs in the US are a travesty and poorly ran. The government wants full control and not pass any control whatsoever to it's citizens.

[@katarzynakapusta2525]

"The end of condescension" means here "let's switch focus from Poland and Hungary to somewhere/something else". Not that I defend the governments there - but the speaker seems to forget the societies there are divided and that shifts towards more populist regimes also happen in many Western countries. Especially after a period of others telling them exactly what they should do and of a rising inequality and precariousness in result of that tutoring. It's not a matter of sharing certain values - rather of whether they ring true. What PiS bought support with in Poland was simply introducing an hourly wage floor and a universal child benefit - both common across Europe and absolutely vital for the average citizen who kept hearing of a rising GDP while also earning under 2 euros per hour for years, on "commission" contracts with no benefits or stability but a daily work schedule, no matter what industry one takes into account. How was that fine with European values? How did no one lecture Polish politicians back then that it is not great to let the labor market go wild and play it cheap and cheaper? Why did no one frown upon letting the new investments from European funds be done by firms that run on such gig-economy-minus-the-liberty terms, the lowest bidder wins, at odds the Polish labor code? Suddenly it turned out that new policies could easily be afforded. Once PiS brought a token of fairness and equality with them, it's far easier to go about any rogue agenda.

[@ideasconcorbata]

With all due respect, this is so narrow sighted and absent of political ideology is just wishful thinking...

[@romanbrandle319]

Yeah , Neo-liberal mutations are just more of the same , fake green , fake democracy and more BS .

[@garysquarepants898]

@Bob Pay your medical bills and shut up

[@garysquarepants898]

@Bob That is not socialism, is Comunism in propaganda but an ultra-capitalist aggressive dictatorship in its actions. How is possible that you can't see the difference between Juguslavia in the 70's or the italian experience, or the french in that years and Russian Comunism, or the Chinese in this case? Under the Socialist party Italy became the 4th economical superpower in the 80's. Ah yeah, i know why, the Capitalist "make-dumb-confused-greedy-consumers" American school system

[@garysquarepants898]

@Bob Communism, as Democracy, can come in many shapes and forms, so stAp speaking as the index of a book you and a few culture men know. Definitions and etiquettes do not describe, just the opposite. You mixed times and history like a salad, and breaking news, it is not a salad. Europe is De-mo-cra-tic, repeat once again De-mo-cra-tic. We vote for people that manage our resources, without selling them all to privates, in Democracy the State doesn't control any of the Companies assets, everyone is free, but we strongly reduce lobbying and bein corruptible because we have a strong millennial culture linked to our planetary resources, we don't bend over for every bag of dollars putting the health of our population at risk, facts. Doing so, we avoid having thuosands of sick people filling our hospitals constantly, and we have a large population of oldies because they don't die of all the nice and specific diseases you guys like to have in your bodies, thanks to poor nutrition, poor water and lifestyle quality, but at least your companies can have the best deals to make the most money out of you guys pockets and lives. Imo, you guys are living in a dystopia already, first sign? Spendig time addressing fantasies on the rest of the World and reinforcing biases by repeating yourselves that you guys are the best , when it's clearly false for everyone else in the First World. Keep doing it though, fake it untill you make it! :D

[@tahitihawaiiblue]

What about the raise of poverty in “developed” countries???

[@neola1712]

Then you have no one to blame but the capitalist and their friends in the government in that country.

[@neola1712]

@Boy Kulot is thinking like that makes you more comfortable ignoring the poor and the unlucky? Then good for you man. Let’s others working to improve life. And no.

[@milenastr4385]

@Boy Kulot 😆👌

[@tingsomskjer5975]

Neola - Boy Kulot 2-0

[@neola1712]

@@tingsomskjer5975 not a fight guys! We need to turn another cheeks anytime we can 😄

[@12235117657598502586]

IF YOU TRADE YOUR FREEDOM... YOU DON’T DESERVE IT!

[@noelhughes6101]

Quite right you are. Ireland traded it's freedom (sovereignty) for the betterment of the political class. It certainly hasn't been to the benefit of the electors.

[@williamrbuchanan4153]

Use the word Freedom, is just a dream a condition of your status is in your own mind. What of the Freedom of others? Ego, I have this , I have happiness, I have . All about yourself. Free to dream . We are all separate entities, parasites on the system of control by wealth or imagined happiness., money is the control, even Religion is a control. Unite, it’s near impossible accept by force of rear.

[@burtybasset4486]

States exist to protect the rights of the individuals within them. That is all.

[@svcten]

One would certainly hope so. For doing just that, Poland and/or Hungary would be penalised for not following EU thinking etc..

[@jdsartre9520]

"States exist to protect the rights of the individuals within them. That is all." Ah ha ha aha! Who told you that? Probably the states. The mafia exists to protect the neighborhood. And you need to pay them to do it. You don't get a choice.

[@burtybasset4486]

@@jdsartre9520 The state comes from the people and they didn't set it up to enslave them.

[@aaronwalderslade]

Totally missing the point. How can people be so blind to the force that is causing this? The Dunning-Kruger effect is strong in this one...

[@charliehopkins4737]

hello from New Zealand. the well-being vision is all words and no action. don't hold it up as a standard

[@yiminglu5971]

Ideology politics and values are overstated in this presentation, overlooking the movements of goods, people and ideas that truly epitomize globalization and the foundation of collaborations. People collaborate for common interests, not for the so-called values. A stance based on the ideology is in itself confrontational, rendering the speech an argument in a circle.

[@KRYPTOS_K5]

Yes. I agree with you. If values would be handled as a so strong commanding factor like it was suggested by this author (I forgot his name) then the own globalist agenda between 1990-2020 shouldn't even had started: the nationalist values might never allow globalist values. In fact, if that analysis, say, of "centered on values" explanation of social and geopolitical changing were to be the right explanation then I shall bet that the resulted description of the human universe should be on the edge of a nuclear war right now. Nevertheless I feel we are really facing the end of globalisation as an international enterprise guided by the Western White civilization as it has happen until now. What does it mean? The hegemony of China? Is it so simple? I yet don't know it. Brazil 🇧🇷

[@Uathankicks]

Don’t people sacrifice their liberty for supposed “order, prosperity” and national sovereignty in every country..?

[@MrZacchery]

They don't have to. The world is changing. Labor doesn't mean what it used to, and horses aren't essential transportation anymore.

[@playergamer562]

Supposedly, but so far most countries have failed to do so, therefore the social unrest around the globe

[@MrZacchery]

@@playergamer562 would you go back to taking care of a horse for your transportation? Horses have a negative carbon footprint, I would be more worried about our tinderstick of a globe going up in literal flames.

[@Weaseltube]

Yes but moreso in China. They have a lot less liberty but expect a lot more personal prosperity and security.

[@LucasDanielSantoro]

Yes, but not to the extent of countries like China

[@malcolmnex9297]

He used the end of communism and the shutting down of Hong Kong in the same sentence, didn't the China communist party have something to do with the shutting down of Hong Kong. Malcolm from Oakland

[@joshdwyer13]

The CCP still have alot of control over the economy compared to western economies, but it practically acts as a privatised free market these days. The "state owned" label is more just a formality from a bygone era.

[@PS-ic4bp]

Really - the Netherlands household disposable income has been falling for the last several years - worst performance in oecd.......this guy is just making stuff up - yes lets reduce income inequality by making everyone poor!!

[@tamsheikh]

The theft of colonialism was always going to be a ugly payback. Hold tight.

[@THEKITPLUG]

Central Bankers: ... hold my beer.

[@camilovallejo5024]

Bitcoin salivating

[@Towoawawabo8]

Their time is over with cryptocurrency

[@sinamos3945]

@@camilovallejo5024 Ponzi scheme!

[@homosapien.a6364]

Lmao

[@larsstougaard7097]

2020 was a great year for the billionaires, some almost doubled their wealth. Just says it all.

[@tbear68-]

Is this where we say, "awww... bless his heart". Not sure what his intentions are or his train of thought. Carry on...

[@kNowFixx]

Indeed, lmao.

[@foxfire5235]

The true globalization had just began. Most of us should know why.

[@melissafowler3903]

🥺. We do but now what? It happened right in front of us as they kept us occupied with the PLANDEMIC.... now we’re in it and it is scary

[@邓梓薇]

China?

[@SenorMeinKrafter]

@@melissafowler3903 You types are so pathetic

[@Chucklecheese69]

Peace was never an option

[@louisanow]

I don't see this era as the "end" of globalization so much as it is likely the end of the current _phase_ of globalization. Humanity still has many pockets of isolation, but on the whole, for a variety of reasons, it continues seeking and reaching out for other cultures, ideas, and resources. The "era of condescension" is an apt label, and we all know where and to whom it currently applies. Until humanity learns to value humility over humiliation, history shows the question will remain, who will rise to condescend _next_ . All over the world, the people that _most_ resent globalization's benefits to humanity, who also share a preference for authoritarianism, have long enjoyed the largest population numbers and influence over the rest of humanity. They. are. also. aging. out. In their wake, they have left chaos and ruin for the younger generations to clean up. The older people in general have completely dismissed and underestimated the deep resentment they've cultivated in the rest of humanity. Many of their own age peers share the commitment and drive of the young and will join their efforts to change whatever necessary to improve current conditions. The majority of the shortsighted worldwide boomer generation has demonstrated that wisdom does _not_ develop automatically with age. Dismissing and underestimating younger people still proves to be a serious mistake.

[@seagecko]

I found his voice so soothing. The gorgeous accent, along with his pace. Delicious. I could happily listen to him reading a book. His message is inspiring too. So soothing and reassuring. Thank you.

[@seagecko]

@Ilay Sago John Lennon was a preacher with some hypocrisy... he preached loud enough to be silenced. I agree that globalization is problematic. Mostly because the cultures spreading globally are mostly stagnant fast-food consumerism. Why not join in a community of care and collaboration? If the world can heal then we can join and live as one.

[@alifrobinson1810]

If all mankind can forget about our differences and life respectly and fairly I was believed we can see a brighter future for next generation!! Live with real LOVE@ without expectations!!! Peace with Love from Malaysia 🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾💓💕💞

[@jiahongchen2448]

Let’s also hope that the rich guys ruling treat us as equal humans, not as coals to run the economic engine.

[@verntoews6937]

This will happen when Christ returns as promised,

[@lilyrosesoul0077]

I agree. My fear is the rise of Islamicphobia...in wwi and wwii - hitler made jews the enemy. Now the trend is to be anti- muslim. I really hope all humans can live with peace and respect for each other . Ps : i really miss visiting malaysia! -- from your neighbour Singapore 🇸🇬😊🕊🌹

[@jiahongchen2448]

@@lilyrosesoul0077 Yes, maybe that weakness is in our gene. We like to flock together and blame others. We are only humans and we are all flawed. That’s okay. But we should have the self awareness that we are not perfect at all.

[@mavis3916]

Great comment

[@brezhnev89]

In short: if you don’t like how we want things done-you better watch out. As people indicated here- a lot of opinion.

[@ebrelus7687]

Our diet didn't change for better, healthcare didn't change for better, farming didn't change for better, Journalism level & quality of democracies didn't change for better, ecology didn't change for better, economic systems didn't change for better that is closer to capitalism and farther from socialism, etatism or monopolistic corporate oligopolies, obeying laws & human rights (true human rights as right to be born, right to not be killed for dementia of sickness, right to want freely in public space) didn't change for better. Globalization in all its centralisation and brainless commercialisation brought us less rights, less freedoms, less quality goods, less health. Free internet is close to dying. Globalization in many cases was a externally forced change not a voluntary decision.

[@joshey46032]

For the first 4:40 I thought, "Hey - he's making decent points let's see where this goes." Annnnnd then it went absolutely nowhere. Absolutely nowhere.

[@johnyricco1220]

Organizing the world on values will be a losing strategy for the West. Countries prioritizing well-being instead of GDP are countries that already have high GDP. China does not prioritize stability and growth over liberty because of it’s culture, rather it’s because a nation that big and diverse is inherently unstable with American style liberty. Even mature Democracies like America and the EU are proving less than stable. Countries around the world face a diverse set of challenges to their survival. They will all have to find their own formula instead of copying China or the West. Likely it will be a range of compromises. The West can’t force countries to chose between values and survival. Nor can it just trade with those with similar values. The future belongs to those that are flexible enough to befriend the world as it is. European globalists are making the mistake of thinking American globalists failed for not being ideologically pure, although I do agree globalism can only be sustained with better wealth redistribution.

[@beezusHrist]

No, I think ideological purity is a key component of society working as intended. Let us face facts: The United States isn't really about anything while China has a vision for the future. The United States has to figure out what it stands for or it is going to collapse, and other countries will have to do the same. Currently, the United States only really cares about its own personal business interests with no worries about societal benefit of those arrangements. That has to change.

[@danielbalgobin3115]

completely agree, with so large a global population, which just continues to rise, there is strong needed to be ideologically homogenized. We've seen the results of emphasizing democratic ideals: ego, crippling inequality and political fragmentation. Whatever value system we adopt, we need to take the focus out of the individual and towards the pursuit of a common goal for benefit of the collective, only then can there be some kind of harmony.

[@lunassr7212]

planing project for 200 years 2012-2212 Greenatc company China-Australia need build pipe from Australia to China

[@leonardomarsola9551]

I just don't agree when you say "Countries prioritizing well-being instead of GDP are countries that already have high GDP", as these are opposity things or different paths to choose. It is possible to work with these issues simultaneously and actually should be like that. In fact, many of the globalization flaws happened for try to do so much economic growth without to increase and spread well-being statements at the same time.

[@lunassr7212]

If Globalilization is out from our sceanario program it mean we inside Implicator China tehniq mean all Shao shia jian(war young generation espionage program 1986-mean function your age for every human how you do and the end)

[@chitrahkarthigeyan415]

In theory indeed. It has potential and hope this does take hold. Some aspects missing from the equation are the social issues, existing human rights issues, political crisis.

[@yoshyoka]

I find it interesting how in the comment section everyone is saying that the is wrong, but none is able to give a better/alternative view. I think that for the most part he is spot on.

[@digitalperson108]

Lol. Yup. LOTS of “experts” here on the tube. Truly most have no clue about what they type, just opinions. Only places like here, can they shout there opinions with no real repercussions.

[@kirstinstrand6292]

If so, perhaps in the US, we will witness some States Seceding from the Union. Less cohesive Government control, more power to the People.

[@callumomalley2515]

what is he "spot on" about, exactly?

[@dave4deputyZX]

Bit of a rosy picture painted of globalization there, by which he means the neoliberal era. Global economic growth was actually higher in the 50s, 60s and 70s than it was in the 80s, 90s and 00s, the period he is talking about. Same is true with life expectancy and poverty reduction etc. The "billions of people lifted out of poverty" is partly due to just a few countries, most notably China which was big enough to pick and choose what elements of neoliberalism to apply, unlike most developing countries which had to swallow the whole IMF-World Bank package. There has been a huge net transfer of wealth from the global south to the rich countries during this period, and that has been helped by the policies he is talking about. And this period has resulted in unprecedented ecological destruction which unfortunately may completely undo the progress that has been made in the developing world. Also to credit neoliberal economic policies for democratization is a bit of an insult to the millions of people who took to the streets and toppled dictators from Latin America to Eastern Europe. I'm not against globalization per se, but the neoliberal financialized corporate-led model which has been pursued since the 80s has been very destructive. It led to the global financial crisis, insecurity, catastrophic environmental damage and extreme, eye-watering levels of inequality.

[@Paul-ok6sn]

I lost interest and had a laugh when he started to extol the virtues of scotland; a country that has failed economically, in education, welfare culture, free speech and the pandemic.

[@lesliewilson1570]

Why no mention of big tech, their ambition is to dominate the whole world.

[@theD.1]

Bcause this "KZbin" is on their zone of control

[@privatprivat7279]

ready to ride allong the good way of life and the respect we all deserve for each individual human being.🎆🎇✨❤💫 love from belgium.

[@StephenLee529]

I had a chance to read the comments, I’m glad I did, many feel like I do. Globalization Ending..? New World Order…? He writes for Forbes is connected to the World Bank, and is also cross promoting a book on the topic. He also believes 10 year old Bitcoin is a Tulip...so, everyone is entitled to his or her opinion.....

[@T-Tuohy]

Stephen Lee That’s what I was thinking. His promotion of the EU and China is a big red flag, too. People like this are always on the wrong side of history. Anyone who’s pro big government, is totally out of touch with today’s world.

[@gregmattson2238]

if anything this is a terrifying idea. non-globalism means few ties between countries. few ties between countries means the possibility of competitive superblocks rising with military backing. Every time this has happened in the past it has led to war (cold or very hot) - cold war, world war II, world war I, franco prussian war, napoleonic wars, 7 years war, thirty years war - and that's not even mentioning the extreme chaos of the middle and dark ages. I'm not much of a fan of globalism, but I'm terrified of tribalism and I doubt our civilization will survive if we devolve this way.

[@aigerimtankimanova2363]

China is great, but it has detention camps for non-Chinese minority nations like Uygurs and Kazakhs. So, I disagree that Chinese sacrifice of liberty is a fair price for prosperity.

[@TodaySatan]

I was just wondering if the algorithm that suggested this video knew I was somewhat drunk..

[@Brendag555]

Thanks for the laugh! I needed it!

[@EddieKMusic]

Probably

[@privatprivat7279]

maybe ur onknowingly ignorant and it wants to wake u up a bit in your drunk mood my fellow human.... who knows...or have a laugh like brenda graves...who clearly lost hope,belief, in humanity or anything beyond that.

[@htopherollem649]

the age of condescension is over? I don't know, he's pretty condescending!

[@rkox88]

I looked at presenter's background - he is just a journalist for Forbes. He has very out-dated backward views on China

[@mrbigolnuts3041]

He's part of The Great Reset where big government is in every single aspect of your life, no property, no privacy, but your happier.

[@HistoricRivermill]

@@rkox88 why do you think so and what the current view of China should be? Speaking as a Chinese.

[@iankclark]

Funniest comment for such a serious matter. Ya gotta laugh XP

[@iankclark]

@@mrbigolnuts3041 ... because everyone will be hooked on Soma (Brave New World).

[@DaBlondDude]

Aside from the impacts of Covid-19, this is the first I've heard of a global financial crisis, the end of globalization ... "new world order" is a disturbingly popular turn of phrase for too many. He offers a long list of things that are "over" (perhaps if one plays with semantics I suppose) and projects a lot of things that are still up in the air, not sure how solid these are. I also think this overlooks a few other things happening and quite possible moving forward

[@fennrir9809]

Some of the things he mentions have been happening under our noses this entire time, but people have been either too busy to notice, or don't care enough to pay attention to it

[@DaBlondDude]

@@fennrir9809 Yep, some ... others seem to be questions of perception with a great deal of supposition

[@fennrir9809]

@@DaBlondDude Yeah, I agree it is not 100% factual. But it's a start in the right direction, regarding exposing such subjects to the general population and make them interested in the events not just under their direct influence, but also those making waves elsewhere. In a way, its better to start especulating early, to avoid getting caught "with your pants down" when change eventually comes

[@DaBlondDude]

@@fennrir9809 Flexibly, agreed and without "committing" to one path. Personally I think what would boost curiosity, critical thinking/analysis, awareness, etc would be to reinstate legislation holding "the news" and media in general accountable for the veracity of their content (aside from satire sites, obviously) and also responsible for consequences of false or misleading information

[@fennrir9809]

@@DaBlondDude I agree, most media have been getting away lately with fake news, clickbait articles, etc. It has undermined the profession of journalism as we know it. Then again, its a 2 way street: people have become too complacent and expect news to be delivered in short formats (social media), without doing their own research on the subject. It becomes a matter of controlling the narrative, instead of encouraging folks to get informed and take stands based on different choices. Limiting our choices results in looking at everything in a black and white scenario, thus narrowing our focus

[@shamuscus]

who else ended up here because of a will ramos playlist

[@smalldallas4839]

Me

[@stuartpj8000]

All these one-liners with no back-up or justifications of statements given - he's sprouting absolute rubbish

[@justcallmesab7465]

I hope so. I've been reading 21 lesson for 21st century book by Y. Noah Harari and his statements werent calming and comforting.

[@msamour]

I stopped watching at the part where he insists people are not allowed to have their own values within their own countries. This man appears to be an Elitist Eurocrat that believes the EU cannot do any wrongs. He sure didn't fool me.

[@iankclark]

That is an astute comment and well-spotted. And I noticed he didn't have any values to offer other than "well-being" which is not strictly a value. Well-being of who exactly?

[@alalalala57]

@@iankclark Of everyone? Surprising, I kow.

[@iankclark]

@@alalalala57 It's a nice thought.

[@dionbebe2028]

what are the requirements or qualifications one has to have in order to give a TED talk? .... cuz it seems literally ANYBODY can give a TED talk these days...

[@jonnybergmann7196]

The talk wasn‘t exceptional but this man really has some qualifications! Just google hin. He was a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford and worked for the credit suisse, world bank abd world economic forum

[@jameskulevich8907]

[@danny41992]

To link socialism and communism together shows you have no clue what you are talking about.

[@sandranosocialism1780]

@@danny41992 they are the same in that one leads to the other. Both have failed in history and most people don't know what real Socialism is. Real Socialism means you don't own property. There would be no incentive in Socialism. It's one of the most depressing systems out there

[@ofcl.scumm.]

Is anyone else only here because Will Ramos had this video on a playlist?

[@retroliftsprs]

😂 yep

[@applebit315]

yes😭

[@asimmehmood215]

We should send all these world corrupt mafia to planet Mars . Only one way ticket 😁. Plus give each of them one currency printing machine. Though still their greed will not end.

[@hamza3065]

I don't think this would be a "new" world order. The world was at a similar crossroad in the 1940s.

[@hunden8404]

Exactly, and that crisis was the catalyst to further their agenda. Just like the current crisis is being exploited and overblown to advance another step...

[@CalisthenicsCowboy]

You should check out “the great reset” and “build back better”. Klaus schwab and the world economic forum are also good to look into. The new world order is being pushed by some elites, and they are not secretive about it.

[@T412-r2h]

You’ve not seen anything like this, except in anthology (namely biblically).

[@theD.1]

Why they didnt talk about new democracy rather than globalization Now Democracy only on the hand of Big Tech

[@Limemill]

@Historia Antiqua this was never about benevolence. It is purely about money. Corporations couldn’t care less who they help as long as it means more money

[@solssun]

Really interesting take, refreshing to hear

[@pandat8776]

Hello I am indian and you?

[@eszterm.6324]

As a hungarian...lot of misinformation. Is there only one way of thinking? Dont think so.

[@katieakin9397]

Generalizations likely stem from prominent or loud political views

[@davidwelty9763]

The double edge sword of being an EU member. Share our “values” or else. It’s no different the the Chinese belt and road initiative.

[@johnnyslist9355]

“Sacrifice your liberty for prosperity” unbelievable 🙄

[@silvertube52]

He begins without defining what he means by "globalization". Did he expect the audience to have read some specific material ahead of his talk?

[@Vini-BR]

Exactly. I didn't get the title of the talk throughout the whole speech.

[@millertas]

If things don't change they'll stay the same.

[@dshepherd107]

They won’t stay the way they are now, if that’s what you mean. If you mean we’ll repeat many of the same mistakes we have in the past if things don’t change, I agree.

[@HigherPlanes]

lol

[@classicsethposts]

The floor is floor

[@2008hiragana]

There's nothing permanent in the world except change

[@deviantaffinity1626]

Things always change, so... Yeah? That is the one, lone truth you can believe. And things are already changing in a big way. That's why we see places like the US in so much turmoil. Lots (not all) of it is about a fight against things changing. So many people are scared. So much so that they will actively fight against the inevitable. But even those who welcome the change are a bit afraid. Doesn't matter though. It's coming. Wil it be good or bad? Dunno, but I know what I am rooting for.

[@arslongavitabrebis]

What values ? Regrettably the new values are taking the shape of wild life behavior and drifting away from what we consider “human” .

[@passerby4507]

This seems imprecise bordering on simply wrong, and has an unconvincing conclusion without justifications.

[@Suneokun_]

Im here because of my school subject

[@jomeshvarghese]

You didn't even mention India.

[@hgff69]

If you check his rapport, he's PRO-CHINA.

[@osamamalik3290]

Well he's talking about countries that go on trade wars again and again.

[@zhanglin317]

It is not about mentioning any individual country. He is just trying to make a point. Don't be so self centered. Yoga is about inclusion remember? India? Cough cough.

[@ameliorer]

What thing of any significance has India done to be talked on International forums?

[@RamithGopinath1398]

@@ameliorer I don't think it's about having done something of significance on an international stage: that's an entirely different discussion, for which I would still argue that India has played an important role on the world stage. The discussion here is about in multi-polarity in the years and decades to come. Given India's size and population (particularly it's youth population) it would render any discussion on the future of globalization incomplete. I believe that's the point OP was trying to highlight.

[@anaccount8474]

Post 2020 this sounds like someone from another planet.

[@MarkusOsmers]

Typical European Bankster with US influence if you ask me. Totaly illusional and completely in his own bubble world of whishful thinking. If that is what they want it to happen there might be a chance they will get it, but i dont think so.

[@opeth84]

Totally detached from reality. This is a perfect example of people just talking without saying anything. It would be nice to have nice things and be nice with everyone. Really? Wow groundbreaking ideas.

[@two2truths]

@@opeth84 then all the more reasons he needs to say it. If we’re reaching a point where we can sustainably have wealth more spread out and open with one another, we should fight for it, because currently is going the other way

[@ideoformsun5806]

Lots of buzz words here without anything concrete to offer.

[@srinivasams9323]

One country : It's legal to marry robots Another country: It's illegal to marry robots. One country: we don't have metals to make robots Another country: We have metals but we don't make robots One country wages war on another country Globalisation RIP

[@andrewfreeman88]

It's all information wars and political wars from now on...Globalization will survive.

[@yanzhang4603]

"they are beholden to the Chinese technologies. chinese investors own their debt". Isn't that also true for non-chinese technologies and investors?

[@ramonmedeiros]

He mention the “controversial huawei” as it’s the same as NSA

[@iankclark]

This comment section is so good, I have to say, well done everyone. No-one is buying this.

[@cometjockeydave4041]

As a manufacturing employee in the US. I am ecstatic that globalization failed as it deserved, and for the idiots who thought it was a good idea. The part the practitioners of globalism never spoke about is the fact that globalization didn't mean merely to extend the trade of wares between nations. What it meant was taking so many jobs like mine and sending them overseas without replacing those jobs that the American consumer as a whole was shut down meaning that new purchases like hones, and cars ground to a halt. Places like Home Depot suffered because no one was buying materials for home building jobs, and remodeling jobs were done only when absolutely necessary. People were not buying new cars for the same reason, they didn't have the money to make such purchases because their jobs had been sent overseas, and so many jobs were sent away that if you could even find a job at all it paid minimum wage. Certainly here in Connecticut you can't live on that. All sorts of services were discontinued for the same reason. You could argue that the fallout from Globalization trickled up to the top where money gets handed down from employer to employee, and then the employee uses that money to buy goods, and services which then goes into other goods and services in the making of parts and materials in the making of those products or the facilitation of those services, which then go back down to all their respective employees. Where the cycle starts again. Once you lay off the consumer times a few million and don't replace his or her job the consumer no longer has the money (the buying power) times a few million to purchase those goods and services. When that happens guess what happens. All the new car and home purchases will stop happening times a few million, (who's going to give you a loan when you're not working?). That's where the banks suffered. Anywhere you go all these economists get into different aspects of the fallout from all those jobs being sent away, but they never make the connection that this was the true source of pf the economic downturn in 2008/09. I really wonder if these economists even truly have a clue about that. This is to say that if all those jobs were left alone, and never sent abroad that whole recession would never have happened. The rampant and unchecked outsourcing of American jobs to other countries was ground zero for the whole downturn.

[@JK12518]

Please look at HD market cap and reframe your post.

[@james3876]

The american "consumer" is a product of globalization

[@bagchaser3859]

Globalization never worked in the past so why do it now

[@LiveDeadRecords]

THE PAIN THE WORLD FEELS, IS THE LOVE THE WORLD WITHHOLDS.......

[@allisonlargo7605]

A lot of people in these comments seem upset, but he is talking about politics and trends in how policy and political allies are formed, not necessarily about the common man, and I think he is spot on.

[@ipreferfreedom162]

What was his argument, does anyone know? I didn't get his point at all.

[@getrealchick1867]

I think he is just trying to sell socialism.

[@daveh3777]

I don't think he had a point. Just a viewpoint of where we may be headed worth a rather global viewpoint.

[@ipreferfreedom162]

@Jeffrey Long That's exactly what I think Jeff. He was just rambling on, going on and on and on but just saying nothing at all. I find myself that a lot of people who are in authority in the UK are like this - they all seem to enjoy the sound of their own voice & none of them will give a direct answer to a direct question. I am absolutely sick and tired of it personally. I think the British people are a nation of lions who are led by donkeys & i'm beginning to wonder if the whole western world is like it. Goodness knows what Biden will be like!

[@dwaynedibley3529]

I can see why KZbin is pushing this.

[@ameliorer]

Why?

[@dwaynedibley3529]

@@ameliorer who?

[@a_life_painted_with_color]

Sounds like propaganda, in a weird way

[@tonganqueenb5517]

Or Psyops

[@noahjones8616]

Lots of things are propoganda

[@name-vi6fs]

Trump isn't wrong when it comes to his comments about China.

[@sl2z857]

It’s a shame, it seems like nobody in the comments section actually listened to the talk.

[@michaeloneill5824]

Couldn't agree more. They all seem to want to push their opinions rather than listen to others opinions. That said, you would have to be a fool not to agree with the majority of his opinions. How could you not...it's already happening with the exception of addressing disparity in wealth through tax reform.

[@nelocovideografias6352]

Hey, this vídeo is quite Handy.! I use it everynight to fall asleep!