Mil Mi-28NM: Russian Helicopter to destroys Leopard and Abrams tanks

[@alekseyef1714]

У России отличные вертолеты и самолеты 👌🫡

[@jander3715]

Viva RUSIA. Grande RUSIA ❤

[@ManBad88]

MAKS 2017 - Mi-28N "Night Hunter" up close and personal! - HD 50fps. Here on YT.

[@No-timeforimbeciles]

Love these uploads, always brings out the sad pathetic US & NATO trolls from under their bridges ! 😊

[@ManBad88]

MAKS 2017 - Mi-28N "Night Hunter" up close and personal! - HD 50fps. Here on YT.

[@libramoon9968]

Are these better than the Ka-50 and Ka-52 ?

[@Nero-Caesar]

I wouldn't say better or worse just preforming different roles

[@sidommbt19]

Could be

[@ManBad88]

MAKS 2017 - Mi-28N "Night Hunter" up close and personal! - HD 50fps. Here on YT.

[@alekseyef1714]

👍💪🇷🇺

[@ElyasNazary-l2f]

🇷🇺🇷🇺💪

[@حسینموسیزاده-ذ5ق]

Mil28 come to iran❤

[@Amen6magi]

In your dream😂🫵

[@r.b6170]

" Leo pard " 😂😂😂😂

[@papichulo3840]

Wonder how strong that airframe is to say idk a bradley? Ask that t-90 crew😂😂

[@perfectcell1157]

What a funny person, I am sure you have many friends and parents who love you and care about you

[@tintran2996]

the bradley would not even see the Mi before it blows up lmfao

[@DoguQ]

Another brainless dude who thinks those Bradleys destroyed the T-90. Funny.

[@nodarzaldastanishvili8910]

😮😮😮

[@RaptorCOTS]

Its a good machine. But Russian tactics are quite poor. They use quite modern equipment but mentally their tactics and strategy is still somewhere in 1950s... Even the best machine will fail if managed wrong way...

[@Itswinever7]

Dont get me wrong but through the war they learn. 2 years now, i am pretty Sure they know how to fight against Nato vehicles.

[@serpentpigeon9108]

1950's and 2024 are nothing new.

[@ManBad88]

MAKS 2017 - Mi-28N "Night Hunter" up close and personal! - HD 50fps. Here on YT.

[@alekseyef1714]

Бред пишешь . Откуда такие выводы ?? Что еще за 1950 год ? В какие моменты ты это понял , на что опирался для такой оценки ? Россия давно уже воюет по современным реалиях и опыт уже огромный . Потери в вертолётах , были значительные только, вначале войны. В первые месяцы. Но кому откуда знать, как нужно правильно ? Практика - царица войны , а не только теория . Тактика и методы ведения войны получают в самой войне . И никак иначе. Откуда тебе знать , как воевала бы США , Франция или любая другая страна в этом конфликте ? Может быть , как воюет Россия и какие показывает результаты , это вершина умений и никто не сможет лучше ? Где сша воевали ? Какой у них был противник ? Никто даже близко не имел такого соперника , как Украина с коалицией всего Запада . Никто кроме России , не имеет такого опыта . Европа и запад только слабых бомбили в краткосрочной военной кампании . Никто так долго не воевал с таким серъёзным противником.

[@eduardopereiradecamargo8243]

Conversa fiada

[@przemysawraczy2717]

It is just a poor russian copy of US ah apache. That's what russians do. They steal US projescts and copy them but dont have the real know how to make it as perfect as US oryginal version.

[@user-xqussr]

Really? What about mi-24, ka-50, ka-52?

[@przemysawraczy2717]

@@user-xqussr this are russian constructions od course. However non of them are as good as russians claim. Non of them are as good as amerycan constructions. Simply russian technology isn't as good.

[@user-xqussr]

@@przemysawraczy2717 Russian space program? No? 1961 Yurii Gagarin?

[@przemysawraczy2717]

@@user-xqussr russian spyes maybe ??? Most technology stolen from US. Program Manhattan teals you something???

[@przemysawraczy2717]

@@user-xqussr nuclear, Rocket or aeroplane technology... Russians never had their own but they had spyes evrywhe. They had to steal technology from US to keep up with them.

[@brothabox6998]

Well..stinger destroyed mi-28

[@ManBad88]

and all other, Idiot. Poor boy!