Leopard 2 Tank Abrams Tank & Challenger 2 Tank Vs Russian Tanks

[@Christian-gw5hq]

The "emm one a two e-brams".. quality vid.

[@jaymac7203]

"Leepard 2" 😭🤣

[@hedon_alt]

'Emmanuel Mecren'

[@SILENTALONS]

6:33 when was challenger 2 spelt "leopard 2" 🤣

[@MostlyPennyCat]

I for one was not aware the 1 are 2 eebrams came with Caterpillar tracks...

[@anthonytofts9371]

Only one Challenger 2 has ever been stopped by explosve hit. This was done in error during a live fire exercise.... By another Challenger.

[@tiredgardener]

I want to believe this, have you got a source for this?

[@michaelbreton7550]

One hit one kill not so impressive!

[@ThatCarGuy]

​@@tiredgardener He is right although it wasn't a live fire exercise but in a real battle where another challenger 2 destroyed it, but the issue at the same time is the Challenger 2 really hasn't been that much in war either. So it is a great tank, but any tank can be destroyed. Otherwise they have been badly damaged to the point of harming the crew, no tank is perfect. "25 March 2003: A friendly fire ("blue-on-blue") incident in Basra in which one Challenger 2 of the Black Watch Battlegroup (2nd Royal Tank Regiment) mistakenly engaged another Challenger 2 of the Queen's Royal Lancers after detecting what was believed to be an enemy flanking manoeuvre on thermal equipment. The attacking tank's second HESH round hit the open commander's hatch lid of the QRL tank sending hot fragments into the turret, killing two crew members. The hit caused a fire that eventually ignited the stowed ammunition, destroying the tank. This is the only Challenger 2 to be destroyed on operations." "August 2006: An RPG-29 capable of firing a tandem-charge penetrated the frontal lower underbelly armour of a Challenger 2 commanded by Captain Thomas Williams of The Queens's Royal Hussars south east of al-Amarah, southern Iraq. Its driver, Trooper Sean Chance, lost part of his foot in the blast; two more of the crew were slightly injured. Chance was able to reverse the vehicle 1.5 mi (2.4 km) to the regimental aid post despite his injuries. The incident was not made public until May 2007; in response to accusations that crews had been told the tank was impervious to the insurgents' weapons, the MoD said "We have never claimed that the Challenger 2 is impenetrable." Since then, the explosive reactive armour has been replaced with Chobham Armour and the steel underbelly lined with armour as part of the Streetfighter upgrade as a direct response to this incident." "6 April 2007: in Basra, Iraq, a shaped charge from an improvised explosive device (IED) penetrated the underside of a tank resulting in the driver losing a leg and causing minor injuries to another soldier"

[@tonyjoka2346]

Who have challengers faced anyways?

[@benchapman2401]

@@tiredgardener easy to look up it was a 2003 incident blue on blue its also on the Challenger 2 Wiki

[@SkepticalChris]

Its rather funny, that the Russians first dismissed the contribution of Western Main Battle Tanks, as irrelevant and pointless and that they won't make a difference............then in the same breath, they also react as though the USA is now arming Ukraine with nuclear missiles.

[@recoil53]

Yeah, these people should never play poker. It's a terrible tell.

[@ГалинаЮдачева]

German tanks were seen in the fields of Ukraine 80 years ago last time. They had different names such as Pantheras and Tigers. That story ended by Russian tanks entering Berlin. These stupid Germans are playing with fire. They have not learned the lesson of history. After entering Berlin this time our tanks will never leave it, Russians say. It's going to be the end of Germany.

[@recoil53]

@@ГалинаЮдачева The thing is that when the stuff you say doesn't come close to happening, you look weaker. It just means the day when the Russian Far East goes to China is closer.

[@Infamous41]

Russia gave the Chinese and DPRK jets, tanks and automobiles in Korean war

[@recoil53]

@@Infamous41 Russian pilots flew Migs in the Korean War. Not exclusively so

[@DaddysBelt92]

People forget the tank abilities in a battlefield. Do not ask what can be done against a tank. Ask what a tank can do against you.

[@gamr4367]

The High Explosive Anti Tank round (HEAT) can vaporize enemy vehicles.

[@tonyjoka2346]

Can't do much when an rpg slams into its back

[@jozefhorvat3625]

@@tonyjoka2346 👍👍👍

[@bradleygallavin7378]

​@@tonyjoka2346 Not sure how effective an RPG would be against these machines. The Challenger 2 at least has never been destroyed by enemy fire.

[@Inductus]

@@bradleygallavin7378 it has never faced an opponent equipped so well.

[@gamr4367]

Turns out sending M1 Abrams to counter Iraqi tanks was a bit of an overkill since it seems M60a3's could demolish an inexperienced force.

[@ThatCarGuy]

The T72s sucked so bad they had to rename them to t-90s so people would still buy them as exports.

[@drudriver3660]

@minongtabalno7262 Russian tanks are rolling piles of dung that three Russian soldiers will die in when hit by any of the Western tanks.

[@timjohnson1199]

The Abrams is a complicated machine to operate effectively and there's probably going to be a long learning curve

[@drudriver3660]

@@timjohnson1199 The Ukrainians have proven themselves as quick studies I will bet the curve won’t be all that steep. Least we all make fools of ourselves as badly as the Russians have. Keep this in mind the Ukrainian people have a thriving tech and weapons development program. They do have a cadre of well qualified engineers. I laughed when I read the Russian MOD is convinced American engineers have been modifying those old Soviet drone for Ukraine. Raytheon has other projects to worry with.

[@deathreaper2604]

@@drudriver3660 Tf you just said? ☠️ Your "fAsT lEaRnErS" got demolished after 20 mins of a battle ☠️☠️

[@camodave7490]

Leopard 2's and Abrahams have seen action in other countries around the world and had loses of both above tanks, but the Challenger 2 has also seen action and none have been destroyed, but the tanks are only good in action by how good the tank crews are and experienced enough to use these machines.

[@Inductus]

And how many challengers faced opponents that were even close to parity in technology? None. How about anti-tank weapons or air threats? Same answer. In Ukraine it will be a completely different opponent.

[@paulprice929]

@@Inductus the anti-tank threats were the same as faced by the Abrams and russian supplied weapons so???

[@joannadavis2294]

​@paul price an m1a2 can't take an rpg round :/ theirs story of the tanks catching fire or tank crews getting injured unlike the challenger 17 rpg rounds all it lost was a track and gun sight back in service 12 hours later

[@cucagialluca6217]

If u take a look into the statistics you’ll see that most of the tank casualties are not related to tankvstank scenarios. You people don’t know how useful this tanks will be on the battlefield

[@Александар.П]

Yeah how useful will it be? Who will operate them and how long will training take? These tanks won't change a damn thing in the grand scheme of things.

[@johnharrison6745]

@@Александар.П Each one is worth at least 10 of your tanks. Ukrainian soldiers will operate them. Their training will require about 6 weeks. With their potency, they can do *A LOT* of damage to your antiquated equipment and ill-trained vodka-sponges, er, I mean, "soldiers", Ivan. 😏

[@Александар.П]

@@johnharrison6745 6 Weeks to train how to use foreign equipment in Ukraine with soldiers that don't speak English?😂 Okay buddy. Russians and Ukrainians are practically the same people, they are both known for consuming alcohol. Are you saying Russian soldiers drink more than Ukrainian soldiers? Do you have an exact %? Or are you just displaying your hate for all Russians because you've been brainwashed? I'm sure you're not brainwashed so maybe give us some % numbers.

[@johnharrison6745]

@@Александар.П No; six weeks to train Ukrainians on equipment that's been designed with speed, efficiency, ease-of-use, and relative-comfort factored-in. [and, do you *REALLY* think that LANGUAGE is going to be a problem?] 😏 Funny; Vlad the Putz doesn't seem to think that "Russians and Ukrainians are practically the same people". And, I've noticed that one can see more of that Mongol contamination in the features of Russians... Perhaps the differences in GEOGRAPHY meant less pollution of the Ukrainian gene-pool. 😉 Sure: According to the World Health Organization: On average, Russian males consume 17.99 liters of pure alcohol per year; and, Ukrainian males consume about 14 liters of pure alcohol per year. Are you DRUNK, Ivan? 😏

[@Infamous41]

@@Александар.П these can destroy targets with precision any artillery vehicles from Russia

[@mauricetrotter6010]

What is a Leo -pard tank ? Don't you mean Leopard as in big cat with markings?

[@rickster5120]

Love the look of that T14 Armata tank on here

[@ThatCarGuy]

Western tanks are just so much better especially the Abrams.

[@agkuazlansyahsandayjol6088]

then the Afghanistan drive that tank.. with person carry RPG

[@hopetonedwards3038]

Western tanks, my ass. They're all garbage

[@paulprice929]

The challenger is a better tank than the Abrams fact

[@ThatCarGuy]

@@paulprice929 no it's not. The closet to the Abrams is the leopard 2

[@paulprice929]

@@ThatCarGuy both the leopard and Abrams have lost tanks in combat but not the challenger. The challenger is far superior

[@anthonytofts9371]

In Desert Storm a Challenger 2 lost its track and was hit 91 times by Iraqui rpgs. The crew of four awaited rescue for several hours, and on reaching safety complained of piercing headaches. ...!

[@shanequeen5003]

That was 2003 and it's bullshit because an RPG 7 went threw the lower front plate of 1 it got hit with a missile and about 20 old RPGs

[@63Vaso]

Hahaha, you are watching to many Disney movie.

[@drudriver3660]

The Challenger 1’s most significant tank kill came at this time, and has been (mostly) well-documented. A Challenger with the callsign 11B fired at an Iraqi main battle tank from a distance of more than 5,100 meters - just above three miles - with an armor-piercing fin-stabilized discarding-sabot round, the longest tank-on-tank kill ever. Although the 5,100 meter distance is what is often recorded in history books, at least one British tanker who was in the battle says the kill came at only 4,700 meters, just shy of three miles. If he’s right, It would still be the longest tank-on-tank kill and would be no less impressive, considering the tank’s operation range is 1,200 meters, more than a third of that distance. Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi Army failed to take out a single Challenger 1 tank and the only ones that didn’t make it through the entire battle did so because of technical issues, not due to enemy action the Challenger was however credited with 300 T72 kills.

[@valentinabirulina7812]

iirc challenger2 was hit 91 times by iraq rpgs, 121 times by jedi lightsabre and 3 fireballs from Liu Kang, this tank is a legend!

[@drudriver3660]

@@valentinabirulina7812 I don’t know about all that but I do know that not one was lost in Desert Storm and while the Challenger was not busy not becoming a casualty they destroyed no less than 300 T72s. A kill count of300 T72s vs no Challengers sounds pretty legendary to me and it would to most people…..except of course an Iraqi or a Russian tanker.

[@whitebeauty759]

Appeltje eitje voor de veel krachtigere en mobielere tanks uit het collectieve westen.

[@Kayzef2003]

It's so ignorant to compare tanks when they will almost never get into tank Vs tank battle in a modern war. Instead compare ATGM Vs Tank... The overwhelming majority of Russian tanks destroyed in Ukraine was by Stutna-P, Javelin, NLAW etc....The vast majority of these Western tanks will be burnt by Kornets and Shtrums.

[@recoil53]

I've read that it's really artillery doing most of the tank killing.

[@bluetwister3347]

LETS GOOO DEATH TRAP!!! That was my tank on the cover :D

[@tylerloving7132]

Every tank helps Ukraine. We should be sending hundreds.

[@PNOYPWR]

That being said, Ukraine will surely need these M1A2 which are much deadlier now with the Advanced Multipurpose Round (AMP) rounds that it uses. It has the capabilities to destroy tanks, dragon teeth obstacles, use it in airburst mode against groups of personnel at ranges of up to 2,000 meters and used to flatten bunkers or buildings.

[@rodgerbane3825]

Too large and difficult a logistics trail for a whole lot of them.

[@petel7418]

Russia will be finished before M1A2s even get there..

[@J.M.254]

Nice, this proxy war is getting exciting and expanding. Hopefully there will be a nuclear war soon, which might be inevitable. There will be no winners, but egos will cool down for sure.

[@rodgerbane3825]

@@J.M.254 And of course you would say the obvious answer is just to tell Ukraine to "lay back and enjoy it". Nice try, Comrade Troll.

[@igorberezin856]

This will all end up on the black market 10 minutes after touchdown. None of it will make their intended destination.

[@MelchizedekKohen]

The tank is useless without a top-tier crew as its the tanks crew that makes them deadly

[@mastermariner490]

Tanks are useless if not used in combined arms manuever warfare with infantry,IFVs,Artillery and air support

[@MelchizedekKohen]

@@mastermariner490 indeed the way I see it and the way russia will see this as other countries joining the war effort won't end well for either side

[@mastermariner490]

@@MelchizedekKohen I dont think Russia have much more armour left,except for older soviet era tanks,since they are throwing infantry towards ukrainian positions in human wave attacks with no armoured support,or they could be saving them for their spring offensive. Anyway we will see when Ukraines spring offensive comes and the western tanks arrive

[@MelchizedekKohen]

@mastermariner490 yup putin definitely has a plan in place. The first casualty is usually the truth in war, and I'd bet putin has thrown in all his weaker units or he is indeed running out of resources that will lead to nuclear decisions possibly but ive also read reports that ukraine is running out of men and ammo 🤷‍♂️

[@mastermariner490]

@@MelchizedekKohen Yeah it remains to see,Bakhmut have been a real meatgrinder for both sides,so it all depends on how fast the western armour arrives i guess.Clock is ticking for both sides.

[@Lon3wolf13]

Let's all wait and see how these heavy Nato tanks will perform in the muddy terrain of Ukraine without proper air support.... This will be an intetesting topic soon...

[@limpunsing2229]

It will all depend if the Ukrainian crew is adequately trained

[@sealoftheliving4998]

Its US crew not Ukraine. Hard to train and it takes months or years to master

[@limpunsing2229]

@@sealoftheliving4998 It isn't

[@Ws_minion]

@@sealoftheliving4998 it really isnt

[@Ws_minion]

I know the UK has already committed to training ukrainian pilots and marines so likely theyll grab some tank crews as well.

[@ron2260]

Very little on the versus aspect.

[@goonerland8195]

at no time did you delve into the specifics of the Russian T-90 tank. Not even cursorily. This is a nothing burger.

[@marmadukegrimwig]

What on earth is a Leo Pard???

[@premslovers]

Just like "I".. Raaq

[@shprotos4724]

gl on soviet-made bridges designed for 40-50t

[@chadpaddock9968]

I feel the Ukraine government should pick a tank, the US, Brit or German even French. If they prefer the German Tank then give them all German tanks. Then work a deal where the US Brit’s give there tanks to Germany until they can be traded back by buying the 31 German tank and get there Abrams back

[@ultramarine0123]

But then you can't get the combat data on the other tanks and fix problems in the home countries fleets

[@recoil53]

They are in a situation where they will take anything useful. They are getting tanks from old stockpiles, but not huge Amazon warehouses. Also there aren't that many Challengers in the world. The LeClerc would be my pick - the lighter tank has a better chance on bridges and in the mud.

[@captaintavish3888]

Also how are the logistically going to prepare for this 60t tank on bridge layers and recovery vehicles designed for 45t tanks

[@Gieslly]

They are also sending recovery vehicles and bridge layers ...

[@paddington1670]

im sure smarter heads will prevail.

[@TimboTbagz]

My guess is to strengthen those routes and supply recovery vehicles. Bit obvious, isn't it?

[@Delgen1951]

it depends on the rivers' depth, as most tanks can ford depth up to 4 meters deep, so only need bridges if the water is deeper than that..

[@mohammadhashemi1771]

more scarp metal for the Russians I guess

[@robertplant6667]

So far, the russians are the ones who lost more that 3000 tanks. Because russian army is a joke.

[@mohammadhashemi1771]

@Robert Plant yes well done you have been listening to zelensky carp

[@frederiquecouture3924]

Censors: have a medal, as well, 🏅

[@BackWoodsBillyCraftBeerReviews]

Yes I believe that with the Tank's Ukraine will be able to take back territory from Russia.

[@frikandelkroket9335]

It’s all about combined warfare.

[@deepashtray5605]

The Russians are still stumbling around trying to make that work.

[@frederiquecouture3924]

We won because we wo because we won because we won!

[@frederiquecouture3924]

Upgraded. Military 🎖️🎖️🎖️

[@kevintravis2078]

When the crews go for training the ones being trained on the chally will be thankful when they find out what the extra weight means. Logistically though a nightmare. Should really commission some new hulls to go with the turrets and pass over old reserve tanks not in use. 70 ish would be more use. What tanks do the UK have packed up in reserve? Chally 2, even Chieftain might useful on the Northern defensive line as a deterrent and free up others to move east.

[@tretiakdev]

Can't wait to see them in action hitting russian "tanks"

[@63Vaso]

Tvoj djed je to isto rekao na Staljingradu ,znamo kako ste prošli.

[@jasongunningham9545]

Are you kidding me someone had the new punisher symbol on his tank looks like crap put the old one on there

[@chopchop894]

Lee o pard lol wtf

[@TheoBerkhout]

It's Leopard, it's a German tank with a German name.

[@brightross]

It’s so annoying

[@frederiquecouture3924]

Thanks for sharing.

[@GALSENGAMER]

Perhaps all these western tanks never faced a army like the russian one so it's all to discover

[@bjornsulzbach1820]

Spot on

[@DD-tc8nd]

they were mostly designed with Eastern European conflict in mind.

[@arnaudstanislas4515]

And Leclerc ?

[@Ws_minion]

How tf did you find a text to speech engine that can't say leopard or petrol...

[@glennredwine289]

KEEP GOING TO MOSCOW, REGIME CHANGE!!

[@AnujKumar-pu4eo]

Why not give them enough weapons to end the war rather than keeping it on.

[@nickbakker2200]

Because weapons alone aren't enough to win war and because offensive warfare is much more costly than defending and it would deplete Western stocks. Assuming that the Russians have consolidated their defenses and are in a better state than in September, Ukraine would need a lot more material that the West just can't give at the moment. On top of that, all the materials require trainings and logistics trains which are no easy feat to set up. On top of that, with Russian defenses consolidated, to maximize your succes you need strong combined arms capabilities. That is to say, strong integration and combination of land (tanks, artillery and infantry), air and naval forces which is also not easy and is a weak point of the Russians too. The problem for both sides is that neither side is able to effectively use their Airforce because neither side has and is able to gain air superiority over all of Ukraine. Russia can also for now mobilise a lot more manpower and in the short term can be more risky with starting offensives, though likely at an extremely high human cost. So far they've suffered an estimated 150-200k combined killed, wounded and missing in action.

[@AnujKumar-pu4eo]

Keeping Russians busy thing??

[@kojosmith1210]

There's so much misinformation in this video, I don't even know where to begin.

[@TesGon]

Anyone here still thinks that 11mil tanks are given for free? Or any other weapons are free of charge? When this all ends they are going to " control" not only government but also economy. But I'm VERY happy they are giving all of this help now. God save them.

[@robertplant6667]

Its called a lend/lease program.

[@donaldsinclair7762]

Not all challenger 2 is rifled there are smoothbore too.

[@captaintavish3888]

Also British tanks have a rifled barrel while germans and Americans use smoothbore , soviets used a 125mm round these tanks have a 120mm round .... why are they creating a logistics nightmare . How many rounds will these tanks get 40-50 ?! Or Ukraine just plans to use them as show piece

[@mastermariner490]

Somehow Ukraine have made it from the start with everything from western and soviet anti tank weapons,artillery and air defences,i am sure they will find a way for this to happen too.

[@kreb7]

You know what is worst not having them

[@mohammadhashemi1771]

no this is just a western ploy to prolong the war and get more Ukrainians killed

[@momentsintime341]

@@mastermariner490 Ukraine has been annihilated.

[@mastermariner490]

@@momentsintime341 Sounds like you IQ have been annihilated too

[@danielalexander799]

The difference is that Russian tanks look like hunks of burnt out scrap metal fragments.

[@recoil53]

It's impressive how high those turrets will fly.

[@primeeslawan9749]

Next month kyiv will be done by Russian forces 😭😭😭

[@oinamthoujal8196]

These are best or not will be tested in Ukraine.

[@johnharrison6745]

They are the best. That's already been established. What will be "tested in Ukraine" is how well-trained their new crews will be.

[@ThatCarGuy]

They have been tested in the Gulf War already against Russian tanks

[@jimorr5580]

Could way of kicking on to play World War 3

[@kelvinmwamba5382]

And think of when Russians capture 1 model each of those western tanks...they are going to make 1 thing out of those 3 models.

[@rodgerbane3825]

Many thanks to Germany for allowing the export of the Leopard 2 to Ukraine.

[@TheCelticer]

You're welcome 🇩🇪

[@philsussex]

Took them too long dithering

[@TheCelticer]

@@philsussex unfortunately that's true:/

[@philgibson8853]

I don’t think tank or tanks are going to do much for Ukraine!!! considering whoever has air superiority usually wins

[@christophermercado5466]

Who is doing this video? The one tank called by it's correct name was the Challenger smh

[@mahmudmugarura2175]

M23 We need it to punish DRC government

[@valentinabirulina7812]

Question is: where are those 1000+ soviet era tanks that ua got before the invasion? And if the most of those 1000 ua tanks got destoyed then how the hell those 100 western tanks would make a big impact on the battlefield with more than 1000km frontline length???

[@Player-rr5gk]

Its to do with how they are used

[@Player-rr5gk]

The soviet tanks are crap so ukraine dosent realy have an ability to push forward without significant losses, just like how russia is loosing troops now. However Western tanks are much better and along with other systems being sent will give ukraine an ability to break through the russian defences at different points, not just all across ukraine

[@azobali2670]

I hope a miracle to saveukraine from a dangerous bear. Bear was sleeping over 30years now waken by ukr+wst let see who winn the last breads

[@scottsuttan2123]

Tis funny that Abrams and it's power plant is so incredible yet Sweden and Russia both started the idea of a turbine engine in a tank yet has gone back to diesel Who's up-to-date modern

[@J.M.254]

Looks like an advertising to sell these tanks to other countries. Exciting times in 2023.

[@KuDastardly]

10:08 lol sounds like a half-assed dad joke! 😛

[@terryturner58]

Should have started in last feb

[@SergeyChuiko]

Tell me, how many T-90 were shot down in Ukraine by Leopards, Cherengers or Abrams

[@redbull6911]

Irrelevant to the video but Lee o pard really? It's Leppard

[@scrubvision5652]

these tanks wont do shit untill they silence russian Artillery which is doing the most damage in this war

[@remremsrisri4953]

Oh yes. Another super weapon. Surely it will push the Russians back this time.

[@frederiquecouture3924]

Ah, the UK, NATO...Who is achallenher? Challenger✓

[@user-li8oq3om9o]

Leopard 2 in Ukraine: total failure... Just like in Syria

[@frederiquecouture3924]

🏅🏅🏅 Military 🎖️🎖️🎖️

[@GokantheHusky]

I cringe hard every time he mispronounces Abrams and Leopard Abrams (Ay-brams) Leopard (Leh-perd)

[@MohamedAllam]

This didn't age so well 🤣🤣🤣

[@kenmoore137]

The narration sounds like an AI is reading the script. A-brams, not a-BRAMS; lep-erd, not le-o-pard.

[@TheoBerkhout]

It is Leopard, it is a German tank with a German name, not leppard

[@justasliekmanis6800]

How much tanks destryed russia?

[@timjohnson1199]

This is going to be interesting. Of course, a lot can happen in between the time the NATO tanks can be put in service.

[@glennredwine289]

Yes, hope Biden didn't wait too long & all of Ukraines gains aren't rolled back by Russia's starting its offensive while the Ukrainian tankers are still training. Frankly, to me Biden has been supplying weapons like a frightened old man. It's time to kick the stuffing out of Russia before all the Ukrainian army is killed off & Putin"s next target are the Baltic states & Poland!!Finish this war!!

[@jadecraig9830]

It will not change anything on the batlefield as the Ukhrainian Air Force is non longer there .... and The superiority of Russia in Drones and artillery may represent huge threats to the estern tanks

[@wrt142]

Yeah Russia destroying there own tank battalions isn't news hahsha

[@drudriver3660]

Oh yes they will produce a big change the Russian body count will be significantly higher. The good news is the sunflowers 🌻 will love it. 10:30

[@dr.jamesdenton3051]

@@wrt142 only in your western propaganda. In reality though, RF lost under 19k soldiers, while the ukrlop dogs lost over 157k of their subhumans.

[@MostlyPennyCat]

Funny how this destroyed air force is still conducting air strikes... Magic I guess. Or a respawn timer maybe?

[@azobali2670]

These tank will not change the course of the war because Russia has much superior anti tank killer system such cornet+9systems and new unman tank killer machine has been sent to Ukraine donbas and xaperrasia front

[@frederiquecouture3924]

Games of War.

[@captaintavish3888]

Russia will be aiming to knock some down but not destroy and reverse engineer some technology, people might argue they aren't the latest models but they are still relevant and inservice also most technologies are generational improvements over existing ones

[@mastermariner490]

That will be a generation or two atleast behind any western tanks

[@divoulos5758]

@Master Mariner western tanks are upgrades of older models So are the russian tanks So what's the big difference

[@mastermariner490]

@@divoulos5758 Difference is better armour,better first hit probability and mobility

[@divoulos5758]

@Master Mariner they definitely dont have better armor If you mean better frontal armor then yes for some of them Also logistically all those tanks suck The fuel efficiency of the abrams is shit And they are also overweight in comparison with russian ones meaning less places to move over like bridges for example

[@PNOYPWR]

The Russians can do reverse engineering on the old M1A2 that is why the U.S is not sending Ukraine the M1A2 SEPv3 and the ongoing modernization to SEPv4. Russia will need more access to more faster micro chips in order to make some modernization of their military. The sanction is severely depleting that capabilities.

[@jcj101trucktireschooling2]

Its not about the tank,its about how they will handle the situation in the wa...still Russian will win this war.

[@frederiquecouture3924]

Bosnia Kosovo... Medal 🏅🏅🏅

[@jayeshyeole3444]

India & Russia Joint Collebration Indian FICV Project 1800 Militry Robotic Combat Vehicals & T - 14 Armata Tanks Transfer of Technology Development Make In India Inshishitive

[@frederiquecouture3924]

Military 🎖️

[@joshenarvidsano9976]

Some how german tanks feels right......

[@jozefhorvat3625]

Expensive and complicated (for NATO) targets for Russians...😂😂😂

[@ibrahimcehajic]

It will lead to more loss of life on Ukrainian side cause it takes more men to operate a tank than a rifle and a rpg.

[@kiketve2]

WHAT UKRAINE NEEDS ALONG WITH THESE TANKS ARE THE APACHE HELICOPTERS AND THE FIGHTING VEHICLES CV90 WITH THE 50mm CHAIN CANNON, PLUS THE AMOS MORTAR TANKS FROM SWEDEN, FROM NOW ON IF THE TANKS DON'T HAVE PROTECTIVE LAYER ANTI DRONE AND THEIR OWN DRONE SCOUT ON TOP THAT THE ABILITY TO SHARE TARTGET DATA IN REAL TIME, THAT'S THE REAL COMBINED ARMS STRATEGIES

[@kevinlandry6463]

You should teach your AI how to enunciate words.

[@ronmorrison1964]

Think these newer tanks like Abrams are overkill but will help Ukraine soldier confidence. Challenger, early Leopards,. and later M60 tanks likely would be adequate. Training, artillery, and anti missile/ anti drone support are critical. Also critical,. Isolation of Russian. economy, diplomatic isolation! Damn V. Putin!

[@ChristianGustafson]

It's "Kiev". In "the Ukraine".

[@MostlyPennyCat]

Just 'Ukraine' actually, 'The Ukraine' is a Russian insult, like 'the boondocks' or 'the projects' or 'the south' can be insults.

[@ChristianGustafson]

@@MostlyPennyCat Doesn’t matter, will be annexed soon, at least the good parts.

[@Dinćevolisarajevo]

I Hope the Ukrainian Soldiers are learning fast with the western Tank's?! And then will the Russian's be fucked up! Glory to the Ukrainian troups 💪🏼🇺🇦✊🏼

[@brianwilliams9706]

Is it true that the Ukrainian's are only accepting unmarried tank trainees?

[@mjahangir2612]

Danger

[@rakyat47]

Whoaaaaa

[@captainKedger]

Lee opard ... emm won Abrams.... That's embarrassing that you can't speak your own language while reading it. Hope narration isn't your only job.

[@bogoljubdjordjevic7528]

No

[@frederiquecouture3924]

Rien foutue.

[@derekparisian2023]

Too all the stunned people out there. The tanks being sent to ukraine from the west are being stripped of their valuable electronics and Armour. The tanks ukraine will be getting is a base version. And no one has seen the t-14 armata in action yet as they are training with it near the front lines

[@Zedddownunder]

To little to late Ukraine lost this war months ago

[@oldishjack]

🤣

[@flowerdeflower]

All the NATO guys are dumping their aged old tanks on Ukraines.....And Russia is humping them with fresh Armata tanks......and the quantities being announced not yet sent are pitiful ......and the comparison videos are useless until proper logistics for the armoured division support for fuel and ammunition is available....else they are just technology sitting like ducks

[@tretiakdev]

Armadas? There are only 3 pieces. And all of the in a museum

[@recoil53]

A company of T-14s has recently been sent to Ukraine. Uncompleted and rejected for poor quality.

[@dennistofvesson6351]

Just look at the video from the red square and you se how good the Armata is. They couldn't even tow it away. 😁

[@tretiakdev]

@@dennistofvesson6351 yep,that's right good tank for russian propaganda only

[@alexanderengdahl7203]

Soon to be rubbish 🧐

[@Connor_Roush]

It’s really irresponsible for NATO to give Ukraine western tanks with very little training and minimal logistics.

[@paddington1670]

The Ukrainians are training efficiently and are more than capable in just a few weeks. Literally planet Earth's best units are on the case, we cant expect any better from our instructors from each of our countries. So just keep your shirt on

[@Connor_Roush]

@@paddington1670 tanks are not trucks. New communication protocols, logistics, battle tactics, support personnel. A few months of training will still have them read manuals to execute a few maneuvers. Very reckless.

[@patrickcotter5629]

@@Connor_Roush Nope

[@russia7152]

If russia captures the abrams Amerika finished😂😂😂

[@4411825]

Putting responsible and NATO together when associated with their Ukraine 🇺🇦 project is a oxymoron!

[@zigbeegooblesnort125]

We've already seen it in Desert Storm. Abrams vs. Russkis tank is worse than Tiger tank vs. Gen 1 Sherman's. Abrams use the Russki tanks as target practice 💥💢🔥☠️. Unfortunately, not enough of them will be sent, and it will probably be too late getting there.

[@Globalscanningeyes]

You are comparing a pup to a dog,the t-72 the us faced in Iraq were t-72m and t-72m1s an inferior version of the current upgraded t-72b3 whose armor can take several hits from an abrams,besides most tank battles are rare in this age of artillery and airstrikes.

[@zigbeegooblesnort125]

@Kashiff "Several hits" I wouldn't think so, especially with DP.