This Russian Navy Destroyer is Deadlier Than You Think - Sovremenny class

[@mrmacias4217]

So many generals in these comments wow😧

[@jimdennis2451]

Admirals.

[@alisuprayogo2107]

Yes right.. coz dunning kruger effect..

[@menon_ji4984]

Admirals rather

[@reecom9884]

The old USSR destroyers were armed with everything that could fit during the “Cold War” era. The old “Cold War” gunship destroyers have been replaced with the modern guided missile destroyers since the end of the “Cold War“. The new Russia government has stopped designing new destroyers and will design smaller size frigates instead of the larger size destroyers after the old USSR destroyers are decommissioned; as a cost savings needed smaller crew and maintenance.

[@thirdworldrider6991]

prefer a fleet of frigates. can build like 20 per carrier. and thats WAYYY more weapons.

[@thirdworldrider6991]

like everyone else you skew the original meaning of that quote to make it seem that jack of all trades is not ideal.. the full quote. jack of all trades master of none but better than a master of one. says it better.

[@logicbomb5511]

Your making this up, the soviets where totally not making 'a jack of all trades" unlike NATO ships they lacked a lot of multi-mission capablity. these where very specifically surface war far ship, such that they carriered strictly radar picket helos with no ASW ability so they could target stuff out at the range of its missiles (which are not sea skimming) though the helo.

[@myopicthunder]

stop making up your own facts lol

[@globalalliancetm5654]

A jack of all trades is a master of none but better than a master of one. Full quote

[@PlanetarPL]

I think I remember my encounter with this warship in Wargame: Red Dragon. Very resiliant, hard to kill and very dangerous. I remember initially sending wings of planes 2x F-15 against it and nothing come close to him. His anti-missiles guns manage to kill all missiles and he was very able to kill planes as well. I had to muster a lots of planes, and few destroyers and attack it from all sides simultaniously and then finally got some hits. It was dominating the sea.

[@swguren]

In wargame you only really get OHP’s to take it down. IRL the sovremeny only has short range missiles+older ciws, and can’t really do an insane amount against ASM’s. But yea, in red dragon you gotta launch saturation attacks on em.

[@PlanetarPL]

@@swguren Yea and you also got Kongo which was somewhat on same level but very costly. I'm just watching vids of N.Korea campaign and I see guy playing it got same problems with Sovremenny and with Udaloy-II which is even more dangerous.

[@АлександрОкулов-е5ъ]

Молитесь ,чтобы в войну можно было бы играть на компе!

[@grimkupid8478]

Alright, you convinced me, I want one

[@slavarussia2773]

Nice really love the details keep it up, and I want more

[@Joydeepy007]

You can play with this. In modern warships

[@slavarussia2773]

@@Joydeepy007 I do play that hahaha 🤣🤣🤣

[@billcook7483]

Great looking ship ! Russian warships always look tough!

[@gowdsake7103]

Because they have to have massive redundancy as the crew are even more useless than the Americans

[@albert4153]

I was on one of them. 30 years ago. "Безудержный" - "Bezuderzhnyi".

[@grandyucha6001]

To be more precise, the destroyer was called "Impeccable" city of Severomorsk. I have photographs of this meeting, I served on this destroyer.

[@grandyucha6001]

"Безупречный"

[@albert4153]

Я был на "Безудержном". В 1994. Он стоял в доке на ремонте.

[@OSTARAEB4]

@albert4153-I went aboard your ship in 1993 when your ship visited New York. I could smell the paint. Your comrades were friendly and had a picture with a sailor or two and handed out postcards to all of you. One of your comrades held back and gave me unwelcome look. I felt sorry for him. I hope he got over his hatred.

[@saishaktipanda]

Can you make a video on Vishakapatnam class destroyer???

[@valentyngrytsenko4225]

It isn't from USSR, so is not such dangerous. All that from USSR is mortal dangerous, especially Chernobyl NPS.

[@saishaktipanda]

@@valentyngrytsenko4225 it is indigenous destroyer buddy

[@solomonokoli212]

Hold up, these specs are the upgraded version after refits. Looked it up in Google, and most of the Radars, missiles and Sonars you mentioned were absent on the original version

[@ozrenstevin596]

Ziveli bratkos najbolij ste u svetu.

[@Trojan0304]

How well are crew trained? Damage control seem lacking in recent Slava sinking.

[@cideltacommand7169]

It's more of the old ships without maintanace than damage control. The Normandy got destroyed since the fire suppression system got stripped.

[@SPLFagos]

You've mixed up almost all classes of Russian battleships in the video from small rocket ships up to the first rank class Orlan Destroyers

[@garymunoz6649]

It only takes 1 lucky hit on its amo compartment to break a ship into half...

[@zainjawaid2556]

It is also possible that one lucky hit will never come and the US Carrier will be sunk by this ship.

[@garymunoz6649]

@@zainjawaid2556 its likely the battleship will be sunk by a carrier...how can u dodge at least 50 torpedo planes🤣🤣🤣

[@zainjawaid2556]

@@garymunoz6649 Just one lucky shot required to sink a carrier, just like mention in your comments. And you also must note the price different between this destroyer and a Us Carrier, not to mention loss of number of persons on board both vessels.

[@garymunoz6649]

@@zainjawaid2556 did i mentioned " to sink a carrier" ? ...or u r the one who said that the destroyer could sunk a us carrier?🤭 and my 1st comment has nothing to do with us carriers🤭 i could be from anything! I based it on what happened with prince charles in ww2 against the bismark...1 lucky hit! ... and for a destroyer to bring down a carrier...is a different answer!

[@ashleygoggs5679]

@@zainjawaid2556 the destroyer would never get close to hitting a carrier. If you include the strike group there will be many Ciws there to protect the carrier. The problem with Russian ships is there intel systems arnt as good as western systems. They cant track and kill more then 3-5 targets at a time. This means russian ships are vulnerable to saturation attacks, something that carriers are really good at even if you discount the carrier group. So one on one realistically a russian ship should win on paper but a russian ship against multiple means its going to sink.

[@markkuranin9919]

Massively dangerous. For the crew

[@Addi_Teacha509]

Test them

[@umu8934]

Wow 😮 so many Russian haters here

[@Chunkylover.]

😂😂😂

[@vincespec-op4710]

I Kno right, American fanboys.. typical. I love Russia 💯

[@crableg2128]

that's to be expected

[@GM-fh5jp]

Poor Russian fanboys...always the victim.

[@Chunkylover.]

Judging by this week's news, hmm who's the poor country?😁 The country that lose all wars in the middle east 😆😆😆

[@JamesLaserpimpWalsh]

They need updating so they can tackle swarm attacks. You can't be totally invulnerable and I bet half those systems don't work but I wouldn't want to bet my life on it. If push comes to shove we will be finding out soon enough.

[@Vitaly74100]

рой вылетает из одной точки. гиперзвуковые ракеты превратили тактику авианосцев в тир на дистанции более 2500км, команда даже за борт не успеет прыгнуть. Это вам не с афганистаном воевать.

[@gowdsake7103]

Probably more lethal to its crew than anyone else

[@basukirachmad1011]

Beauty but Deadly

[@andrzej237]

SUPER 👍

[@tunguyen-gk4hr]

Very Good 👏👏👏 Rusia Number One 👍👍👍

[@southbaysaul2543]

Anyone know what the (quite engaging) background music is? Thanks.

[@georgeantabi6025]

Why not replace those obsolete single missile SAM launchers with the new Poliment-Redut VLS? These have a 120Km range, and need much less time to react to threats. And they can also replace one of the AK-130 guns with anti-ship VLS. I think these upgrades will give this ship much more potential.

[@cideltacommand7169]

Weight probably. Refitting ships is expensive and other cruisers can do air defense role similar to the triconderoga.

[@tongtengteng7395]

สุดยอดรัดเชย💪💪👍👍

[@MrWilderNapalm]

You want to see a real nightmare? Check out The Moskva "The Moscow". Now there is a war machine.

[@cideltacommand7169]

Which one ?

[@johnsmith-jk5pz]

@@cideltacommand7169 The one underwater 🤫

[@cideltacommand7169]

@@johnsmith-jk5pz We have 2 more exhibits that are over water

[@TheYak_Traveller]

Pls Compare it with Vishakhapatnam class destroyer of Indian Navy.

[@jackwhitetron]

Hard to believe any of the capabilities claimed pursuant to the Russian military performance in Ukraine.

[@oleksii8375]

Старое ведро времён 60-х, которое уже лет как 30 устарело не только морально.

[@ЕвгенийД-д7м]

"Специалист" по флоту великой морской державы!!!!! Дурьдом.

[@oleksii8375]

@@ЕвгенийД-д7м мы в отличие от вас не великая держава, поэтому соответствовать современным требованиям не обязаны, и поэтому нам не обязательно иметь на вооружении вёдра, которые устарели ещё в момент схода со стапеля. Что может противопоставить ваш хвалёный "флот" хотя бы одной АУГ ВМС США? Вот именно, дурьдом.

[@michaeljp661]

Esta muy bien tus videos deberías traducirlos al idioma español y quedaria estupendo 👍

[@williamchu4595]

beautiful ship

[@robertbelardo7087]

It will become a submarine like the Moskva

[@askaramirov2540]

Старая информация сейчас они на много опаснее

[@MostlyPennyCat]

Not seeing any VLS batteries.

[@CharlonClarke]

good eye!

[@Reactordrone]

Udaloys have them but the Sovremennys retain their old single launcher arms.

[@kurtwolf6918]

Когда вы столкнетесь с русскими, не забудьте надеть памперсы...гиперзвуковой оружие творит чудеса.

[@godzillaeatsushi4979]

You put all off your eggs in one buck. After all you can’t afford many war ships

[@ueks69]

😂😂😂😂

[@pavelvlasov1380]

..."гиперзвуковой оружие творит чудеса"... Progress and Creation Creates Miracles, Not Destruction

[@riskiafrileo1787]

Ora reti artine bhs inggris tak woco terjemahane ae... Hehehe rudal moksit seharus di ganti dengan rudal kaliber atau rudal hipersonic zircon

[@PSM-IPADZ_OX]

Why Warship deck NOT painted RED ?

[@Military-TV]

Because they Blue Navy not Red Navy ( Red Fleet ) :D

[@alexanderlewenko9519]

warum klike ich auf deutsches video und höre englisch ? mus deutsche unter tietel lessen. sich dir meine rechtschreibung an ! bin ich aut youtube im sachen zu lessen ?

[@patrikjakobsen2142]

Russian warships are so heavily armed its crazy. They prepped for almost everything

[@Vitaly74100]

поэтому медведи приносят нам водку

[@mrgeorgeb0062]

Doesn’t mean they’re actually any good 🤣

[@yasingursel1611]

"Bla bla than you think", "lala than you think." Man be different from other YT channels.

[@johnbarleycorn699]

IF IT FLOATS . . .IT CAN BE SUNK

[@ramprasada2682]

Very impressive warship

[@ueks69]

Was, it is very old

[@АлександрБойчук-ш9е]

бугагагагаггагааа

[@vladislavovich100]

And American destroyer even more deadlier than former Soviet destroyer.

[@rosaguevara9339]

Tienen que traducirlo al castellano para que tengan más audiencia

[@diavolo4130]

SA-N-7 for me moderen warship player its called M22 URAGAN

[@СЕРГЕЙЭдуардович-м1г]

Корабль очень крутой и превосходит многих, но вот только из 20 кораблей в ельцинско-путинскую эпоху почти все были уничтожены, на ходу всего один корабль и два в ремонте. остальные порезаны на иголки

[@jurgenmuller143]

Nice radar signal.The Swedish stealth missile stealth boats will like it in the Baltic Sea.

[@mladenratkovic1066]

hee you mean ''one'' that was lost do to search for Russian logs heee in Stockholm archipelago heee you good almost funny heee

[@MrAllenIV]

Of course they are. Welcome to Russia Jurgen. Sorry, my English is bad, our bullets way better.

[@Cuplex1]

" stealth missile stealth boats"? Are you talking about the Gotland class corvettes? It's not a fair comparison, how about comparing the Gotland class to the Admiral Gorshkov class frigate or the Steregushchiy class corvettes.

[@ueks69]

@@Cuplex1 super since they are not deployed in the baltic, Russia cant move a nail in the Baltic without NATO knowing it.

[@vyacheslavvorobyov22]

"Swedish technology" -- short joke.

[@andrewemery4272]

USN Captains have all been issued with brown trousers...

[@jimdennis2451]

It is called 'khaki'.

[@michaelwong4303]

not "too bad".....a 8,000 ton ship but only has 48 launchers...comparable to the British T45 (8,500 tons, 42 VLS), no march for the mighty American Arleigh Burke (9,600 tons, 96 VLS).😊

[@bigodinho1980]

sería chévere que me canal tuviera en español también es muy interesante

[@jabaontour]

warum ist alles auf deutsch nur das video nicht wtf sinn ?

[@maxt7525]

Lots of comments regarding its lack of stealth....so it’s on par with most UK ships and most American cruisers and support ships you goons 😂 Russian missiles out perform most western equivalents actually. Arrogance is a sure way to ensure you under estimate your opponent

[@ligmanutz5994]

i swear, if wars are won by arrogance, the us would be undefeatable! ironically, they havent won any wars since ww2 lmao

[@vensb8862]

@@ligmanutz5994 Breaking news for you...NOBODY WIN ON ANY WAR and USA is still the most powerful military in the world. read that and weep😂 LMAO

[@ligmanutz5994]

@@vensb8862 yeah whatever bud

[@user1qaz2wsx3edc]

@@vensb8862 Lmao! Korea,Vietnam, Afghanistan,etc..

[@logicbomb5511]

@@user1qaz2wsx3edc All wars Russia lost!!!!

[@brianfoley4328]

Anyone who doubts the capabilities of Sovremenny class Destroyer is in for a rude awakening...having said that they won't survive a fight with the US Navy...there's just too few of them. The Americans would not want to take a Sovremenny one-on-one, so they won't. The Americans will swarm the four ships in that class. The Americans have 68 Burke class Destroyers...that's quite an advantage, not to mention 11 "Super Aircraft Carriers" and 11 more "Mini-Aircraft Carriers". In an Sea War the Russians would be slaughtered just by the sheer weight and number of American vessels...not to mention other NATO partners.

[@eduwino151]

America mainly uses planes to kill ships in a conflict carrier launchev F18s would turn it into scrap from long range

[@perfect.player]

Russia would never fight openly with us cause they know that usaf or us navy will destroy them in a few seconds. The problem is that eu fears russia and eu would never fight with russians. Russia is using their fear and conquering Ukraine. Usa also cant really protect ukraine becase russia is using nuclear blackmail. It's unacceptable for usa to let russie conquer ukraine because if they will, china will conquer Taiwan that would mean usa is not the first army in the world, and of course if so, not first country in the world.

[@outrider425]

@@perfect.player they wouldn’t destroy them in a few seconds it would be a long and bloody war the US would probably win because they have the numbers,more allies and Money

[@Conan-ny1um]

You forgot the 22 Ticonderoga Cruisers with there 122 VLS Tubes!

[@liamvosefski2795]

The russians have decommissioned almost all the sovs in the last decade theres only a couple left and they dont sail often they turned their attention to modernization of the udaloys instead

[@ratnasuminar4516]

What about posseidon toroedos...Rusia

[@dontanton7775]

Dude, send me your script and I proof read it. Your sentence structure is so bad at times.

[@GM-fh5jp]

So is your's..."and I *will* proof read it?

[@DVMaytinhCameraLeNguyen]

ủa, tiêu đề thì ghi tiếng việt, mà tại sao nói là tiếng anh vậy, vậy ai hiểu nói gì

[@dweagar]

You're about 15 years too late on this video. The Sovremenny was a decent (by Russian standards) DDG years ago, with her ASCM capability, but she's long since obsolete. Her once capable ASCM are now easily defeated by modern passive and active decoys in addition to newer anti-air point defense weapons. Her electronic fit is seriously aging, her SAM (what little she has) is equally old and obsolete. This class is such a POS now that the Russians have decom'd most of them. It's not deadlier than I think, its about 10 years from being made into an artificial coral reef. The Russians just don't seem interested in updating her or maintaining a viable surface navy to counter external threats. Instead, they seem bent on developing smaller FFLs similar to the GRISHA for coastal defense and rely on submarines (which they actually excel at) for power projection. Their CV is a joke, she's always broken and never makes it through a deployment without having to go back for repairs. Russian navy is a shadow of what it once was during the cold war. As someone said below, they look scary... but that's about it. Naval warfare isnt about who looks the scariest, it's about who hits first, who hits last, and who doesn't get hit at all. The only thing the Sovremenny is going to hit in a modern naval battle vs any of her current adversaries, is the bottom.

[@Pythoner]

The Udaloys are all being modernized (and quite extensively), while the Sovremennys are on their way out. It's possible a couple of Sovremennys will be kept around with mild modernizations and overhauls for another 5-10 years. Otherwise it's the Gorshkov and Super Gorshkov classes that will be replacing them.

[@poligrafsharikoff1231]

Если все так плохо объявите русским войну,но рекомендую прочитать перед этим,как закончили Гитлер и Наполеон😂

[@highjackish]

У рфии много аналоГовнет... Один новый недавно самоликвидировался, не успев даже из доков выйти)) А другой Кузя ходил-дымил и стал на ремонт, где также уже несколько раз предпринимал попытки самоубийства..

[@udaikcsps9299]

3:27 I can see Karnataka flag over there.

[@farwestgarohills3831]

All it requires a middle finger to sink Russian war ship.

[@darta1094]

"lack of fund and trained pesonnel" 🤔

[@КонстантинслюбовьюизСибири]

Миру мир! Всех жителей планеты Земля призываю к миру! А иначе все помрём! ;) хе хе...

[@ПроцюкАнатолий]

1960 год! Корито ещё плавает!?

[@sashan1975]

если не понимаешь нихера , нехуй лезть. первый корабль построили в 1980.

[@ПроцюкАнатолий]

@@sashan1975 О жопа подогрела! 1960 год! Закладка! А сколько строили это другой вопрос! Учи историю Московит!

[@sashan1975]

@@ПроцюкАнатолий ты, бы хоть поинтересовался вначале, что б потом говно из шаровар не вытряхивать, 1 корпус заложили 1976г и сдали в 1980. даже через инет вонь от вас несусветная.

[@valentyngrytsenko4225]

@@sashan1975 Штаты давно вместо кораблей тех времен понастроили новых. Но они, конечно же, ни в какое сравнение... У вас тех эсминцев осталось 2 (два), новых нет, и объявление любого из них смертельно опасным, конечно же, вызывает безудержную панику у адмиралов НАТО.

[@sashan1975]

@@valentyngrytsenko4225 это ты к чему политинформацию развел?ты думаешь я не знаю про корабельный состав у штатников и нас? Мы не штаты, у нас бабла нету, армаду строить и содержать. А сдерживать армаду можно постаратся. Фрегаты, корветы, малые ракетные корабли с калибрами ,уранами, цирконами строятся. Подводные лодки дизельные атомные, с ПКР и МБР вводятся. Береговые Бастионы и Балы. Есть чем отмахнуться.

[@dohadatadata2639]

Very good job by rusiia

[@hardtbrett]

one hit and it sinks like all other ships, weapons doesn´t matter

[@therealman2016]

Plus it will need a tug boat to get a round ahaha

[@incognitoone]

uuuhhhh you can't sink a ship w/o weapons, besides, it's seldom to sink a ship this size with one hit, unless it hits a magazine directly maybe. Weapons don't matter? Well maybe not, until you become a recipient of one.

[@user1qaz2wsx3edc]

Hypersonic missiles makes a huge difference.

[@андрейкрасиков-п3т]

и вот это корыто из 70-х гордость современного флота рф-ии? стыдно за страну. за экономику. за маршала-оленевода. за армию поднятую с колен плешивым царьком.

[@Vitaly74100]

ты пишешь с украины или с другой мощной державы? так у вас совсем не так как в России) Поинтересуйся, сколько атомных ледоколов построено в РФ сегодня, про гиперзвук и новые подводные лодки. а свой черно-белый телевизор можешь отдать в музей, если у них нет. с интернетом видимо у вас тяжело)))

[@андрейкрасиков-п3т]

@@Vitaly74100 я русский в 10-м колене пишу тебе с Питера где на верфях стоят из-за санкций за Крым недостроенные эсминцы а телевизор у меня один сделан в Японии второй к Южной Корее. машина моя немецкая. компьютер китайский. картошку сегодня купил из Египта а редиску из из Израиля где вместо земли камни. даже бензин на бензоколонке Лукойл что под окном из Беларуси.

[@anatoliyivanov5498]

@@Vitaly74100 А капуста у вас почём

[@tswizard13]

They are more heavily armed but the crews are not trusted to operate or repair the systems. If a system fails they go to the next one. but USN crews operate, maintain, and repair all systems.

[@dynastywarriorlord07]

The Slava cruisers are better than the sovremenny destroyers and even those ships were sunk easily by Ukraine

[@Мұңалли]

Какой-то старый металомы

[@firexl007]

LoL I'm sure NATO ships would love to get hypersonic Sunburn by Russian destroyer 😂😂😂

[@verdebusterAP]

More like a bucket of bolts

[@__hjg__2123]

0:56 is that USN visiting ?

[@КонстантинСабуров-й7ь]

Ну и как эта мощь помогла СССР?

[@ahadicow]

BTW China bought 4 of those and quickly replaced almost everything on board and still found them useless next to their 052D and 055

[@P4hko]

probebly bought them for closing the missing protection then felt they needed and then just learned everything they could about them to make better

[@agrochannelua794]

Russian go home, no vodka.

[@februus6460]

SOVIET = STRONG

[@verdebusterAP]

The Sovremenny class doesnt have any modern weapons that pose a threat to USN at all

[@augustvonmackensen9785]

Such a short comment, yet packed with so much stupidity. Sir, we salute you 🤣

[@volavonok3964]

Zircon and Kalibr missiles to mention a few.

[@vyacheslavvorobyov22]

@@augustvonmackensen9785 This is an essense of troll.

[@ВладимирТвердохлеб-ь8т]

Конечно ! Такого АНАЛОговнета ни у кого нет ! Желаем повторить судьбу " КУРСКА " !

[@xyzabc101]

But they r fuckin slow

[@flogger8413]

How is 32 fucking knots slow?

[@Conan-ny1um]

Old Tech

[@rolandofaa6138]

I dont think so

[@ВладимирСтальский-о5л]

Это эсминцы СССР.

[@Ving_Demon]

Aviation flies up at a minimum altitude and destroys these troughs with Harpoons 1500 km from the aircraft carrier

[@GM-fh5jp]

Harpoon missile has a max range of about 100kms or so...

[@Ving_Demon]

@@GM-fh5jp F-15 can fly 2000km, hit targets and return

[@GM-fh5jp]

@@Ving_Demon very vulnerable to latest gen anti-air missiles from warships which will engage at long range against incoming Eagles. Also Harpoon is slow, sub-sonic, and does not carry ECM for self protection.

[@Ving_Demon]

@@GM-fh5jp The enemy ship detects a satellite or AWACS aircraft. Further, the eagle at a minimum height, out of sight of radars, delivers the harpoon at a distance of 100-150 km from the target and launches it. The rocket flies towards the enemy, when it approaches, it turns on the seeker, and attacks, either from above or from a minimum height. No existing ship will have time to intercept 5 such missiles at the same time

[@AP-cv7jz]

@@Ving_Demon from mainland only )

[@JimmyOcenar]

My battleship is my enemy hehehehe. Is me

[@mandalortemaan7510]

Big boom

[@MrPegge]

Полностью устарел, для врагов безопасен, если это не папуасы вроде незалежных.

[@7ebr830]

So, a 40 year old rust bucket might be excellent fighting against a third world banana republic, but I wouldn't want to be a sailor in one of them and find myself going up against a modern NATO ship!

[@pavelgrau]

сколько современных кораблей в НАТО?

[@ueks69]

@@pavelgrau most are modern and build after 2005-10, Russia only have subs that are a threat, but they cant use them in the Baltic

[@pavelgrau]

@@ueks69 Вот только военная аналитика говорит о другом. По количеству да, блок НАТО выигрывает, а вот по годам постройки практически одинаково. В тех же США до сих пор плавают суда ровесники. К тому же, не стоит забывать что и НАТО не может использовать свой флот на Балтике и Черном море. Вот тихоокеанскую флотилию можно и укрепить

[@Antoniobr911]

@@pavelgrau a lot, unlike russian our ships didn't rust for few decades in naval bases on Arctic and Pacific oceans or Black and Baltic seas but were maintained in proper manner. Russian navy is obsolete compared to navies of NATO, at best it can defend russian coast but it cannot be used for projection of power far from russian territory. Truth is that Russia can not compete with NATO, Russian Federation is just a shadow of what USSR used to be. Russian economy and budget simply cannot compete with NATO because NATO makes half of world economy while russian economy is au pair with economy of Spain. Better invest those monies in rising living standard and civilian infrastructure of your people than bullshit weapons because no one will attack Russia anyway, nuclear arms are firm guarantee of russian security, your government doesn't need to spend billions on competing with NATO while average Russian lives with 20 - 30 000 rubles per month.

[@ueks69]

@@kresnik_ss the truth hurts

[@viviboeckx5478]

All propaganda from russian puppets

[@Welder_iron-1987.]

Машины слабые. Паровая система не очень надёжна

[@charlesfink2840]

A laser will destroy all aboard.

[@Cuplex1]

😄😅😆 Sure buddy. A laser pointer and puff. How about a Star Destroyer from orbit, or maybe the Deathstar?

[@willfriar8054]

A laser has actually very short range. You can't hit anything over the horizon with a laser. However an 18 inch artillery shell that will go 50 miles and can be corrected with a spotter is going to do a hell of a lot of damage. Well over the horizon. Lasers are only good for aerial defense and close-in Weapons Systems

[@briant5685]

russia has laser too duh

[@llamudos9809]

Not against a saturation attack from gbu-39. It would be toast.

[@CheapSushi]

IF they get close enough

[@llamudos9809]

@@CheapSushi Thats the thing they do not need to get close!

[@TocTeplv]

Russian propaganda. Probably she's in docks cos it's old and rusty.

[@mazasti]

Pura chatarra de los 70

[@juriysckolenko9892]

,,капец,,,)))))

[@dimvin3888]

:)))))))))

[@barmalina]

про скорость корабля наврал.

[@paulofranciscokeppler832]

é só mais um destróier, nada de especial..!

[@ahadicow]

as if you're not dead enough on a 50 yr old warship with next to none air defense

[@Cuplex1]

It's like saying aircraft carriers are useless because of submarines. Yes, if an aircraft carrier sailed without its support ships. Sure. In reality, they dont.

[@ueks69]

@@Cuplex1 well here is the thing Russia navy have no support ships with real blue water cap.

[@Erik_Ice_Fang]

These ships were meant to operate paired with the Udaloy class destroyers which had far better anti air capability

[@ОлегКостырко-ц8ы]

писеж.

[@おおおおおおおおお-s6s]

これモダンウォーシップで持ってるw

[@flogger8413]

Ushakovは誰にも負けません

[@おおおおおおおおお-s6s]

@@flogger8413 まじですか！じゃあ今度使ってみますね

[@hyc7435]

ｱﾎ

[@tominmtnvw]

Baloney