Something STRANGE flies from the CHINESE CARRIER 003!

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Part 1: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qpW2kqBtq8mNh7s Join this channel to support it: kzbin.info/door/VDkfkGRzo0qcZ8AkB4TMuwjoin Support me on Patreon www.patreon.com/Millennium7 One off donation with PayPal www.paypal.com/paypalme/Millennium7star Join the Discord server discord.gg/6CuWEWuhsk ---------------------------- Ask me anything! Take part to the community Q&A clicking the link below! forms.office.com/r/LNPQtf3Tc0 -------------------- Visit the subreddit! www.reddit.com/r/Millennium7Lounge/ ---------------------

[@christophmahler]

0:57 "contrast" = _contest_ "AWACES" = _hobbitses_

[@ujjalshill6442]

Don't you think India will have made its own carriers and defences by the time china builds it's 10 carriers

[@user-os6ch5pt7w]

Be honest. How much does the CCP SCIO CAC pay you for these propaganda pieces?

[@christophmahler]

@@user-os6ch5pt7w How much does the CIA pay You for _upvoting Your own petty remark_ ? Listed.

[@ujjalshill6442]

@@user-os6ch5pt7w 50 cent

[@baronvonlimbourgh1716]

The chinese are doing very well. A lot of high tech stuff comming from china. Insane if you think about what the country was 20 years ago. Massive respect for the chinese!

[@slickstrings]

comes mostly from data theft and flat out copying. We know this is true, chinese officials have even admitted it. We can also see their f35 copy has elements copied that didnt even need to be. Example, the cockpit opens forwards, same as f35, but the f35 opens forward because it shares structure with the STOVL variant and there was no room for the mechanism behind the cockpit. The chinese copy does not have this issue, so they dont even THINK about what they are copying. They just steal and copy as much as possible.

[@comediangj4955]

Trust me when you lived your entire life during that time, it becomes the norm. (I'm a 22 years old Chinese) When I was in Canada I watched a homemade video of Canada from 20 years ago, and was shocked (yes, SHOCKED) that everything looks basically the same as today. It was only then that I realized how unusual of a time and place I lived though.

[@baronvonlimbourgh1716]

@@comediangj4955 yeah, we had that 1 or 2 centuries ago or so, just took us probably 100 years or so to do what china did in a single generation. The pace of change is relentless, when i was growing up bejing was called the city of bycicles because that was their only transportation and everything was maybe a couple of stories high. I remember seeing it on tv as a kid. I can't imagine what it would be like growing up in such a time. We westerners are very nostalgic and emotionally attached to enjoying things you love for a lifetime, the places where you had fun as a kid or had your first kiss still being there 30 years later. Or that shop where you bought candy still being there and the owner that used to be a young guy now being old but still remembering you from back in the day. That sort of silly stuff. Probably very little of that left in china i imagine. But yeah, progress is progress, it waits for nobody. But once you got everything you need most things last a long time. Like planning and main infrastructure and stuff is done once and then it stays the way it is basicly. Every once in a while a building or structure gets replaced. And every 15/20 years the streets get overhauled and updated to the newest in road design and things like that. Will happen in china as well eventually.

[@comediangj4955]

@@baronvonlimbourgh1716 yeah none of the places I recognized 10 years ago is recognizeable to me today, can't think of a single one other then maybe the biggest park in my city. But yeah the pace of change will definitely slow one day.

[@min-jd5lb]

It is just norms for Chinese to see desolated barren lands far away from city center turn into blocks of office buildings and shopping malls. My home was like half an hour of driving from the city and all the changes happened within 6 years, ages of big change I guess

[@kakavdedatakavunuk8516]

No one is covering Chinese military aircraft so thoroughly on youtube as you are, and I am enjoying following you. China is terra incognita in military technology and is full of surprises. Things are changing there rapidly and one day we will wake up and see that they are actually the strongest superpower. Could you give us your view about DF-17, I think it would be interesting. Also, Chinese companies are heavily committed to reaching the necessary technology for the 6 generation fighter aircraft. Can you speculate something about it?

[@obsidianstatue]

*In the English sphere, yes. In Chinese there are several military shows that exists on KZbin, many of whom are done by former PLA engineers/ retired officers (these shows are ports, ie they are actually on Chinese platforms and they just have someone to upload them on youtube) Several have correctly predicted the J-35 to be the carrier based fighter for several years, as well as predicting the deployment of the ship based ASBM.

[@kakavdedatakavunuk8516]

@@obsidianstatue There is no doubt that there are a number of people in China who cover military technology but I live in Europe, and for me is hard to know what is happening on the opposite side of the globe.

[@tinfoilhatnews7489]

They are stealing American designs

[@NineSeptims]

LOL the strongest superpower??? LOL china shills

[@kakavdedatakavunuk8516]

@@NineSeptims Who is Chinese?

[@tonysu8860]

It should be noted that since the Type 003 is conventionally powered, it's likely that it will need to stay within about 2 weeks of a friendly military port for resupply unless it wants to be risked stranded at sea (I don't know that accompanying tankers would be a good solution to extend range except in peace time). Unless China can make more deals like the Solomon Islands, this severely restricts using the Type 003 and probably means it won't be in the Indian Ocean much.

[@thomaszhang3101]

Yo, can everyone stop fighting in the comments? This channel is for military enthusiasts. If you are interested in a particular nation then just wait, Millennium will get to it eventually.

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Thanks, this has become more about India than about Chinese carriers.

[@digitalpostman]

@@Millennium7HistoryTech A countryman nervously looking at a group of horsemen: do you want my donkey? No! we have our horses and we are marching!

[@devolvedspud6101]

While I understand your objection to the comments; can you tell me what "military" means please ? ( Clue: fighting ).

[@thomaszhang3101]

@@devolvedspud6101 if you are a space enthusiast, do you also launch rockets into space?

[@FFXIrocks-mj8wl]

I’m Chinese and don’t you worry that 003 is our giant fishing boat to fish….. I don’t know, krakens maybe 😂

[@kartikeykasniya6971]

Your fishing boats are more agressive in other's territory then your aircraft carriers that's for sure.

[@FFXIrocks-mj8wl]

@@kartikeykasniya6971 😂 tell me this comment when our fishing boat arrives at Indian Ocean, kthx

[@kartikeykasniya6971]

@@FFXIrocks-mj8wl your fishing boats are already in indian ocean, in pakistan, pakistani politicians and china fill their pockets while the locals starve.

[@Frosty_357]

I believe in you man. All the aircrafts will drop fish nets right?

[@FFXIrocks-mj8wl]

@@Frosty_357 what ya talking about… aircrafts are farming chickens thus they drop eggs ya see? Some eggs are better at gliding than other eggs I guess…

[@aphidian]

There are rumors that the KJ600 can be deployed on 001/002 using rocket assisted take-off, but just a rumor.

[@chrissanchez9935]

Thank You for sharing, Sir.

[@stc2828]

I think YJ21 is exactly what the Chinese need against the US fleet. With that Chinese planes simply need to detect the US fleet, the destroyers can send massive barrages at US fleets, while Chinese planes can focus more on air to air and recon missions.

[@user-hj8mz3hp3s]

They should take out ticonderogas and burkes and carriers become defencles.They are like cly pigeons

[@SSGTWinters]

so the flopping tiger is suppose to what either choose arms or fuel ? becuase even internal reports say it cant do both. Chinese crap sucks. its all russian copy and we see how that is working out right now

[@stc2828]

@@SSGTWinters Do you still live in the 20th century? Russia doesn't have anything like the 055 or df21. Chinese in 21st century learns from American designs. For example, 052 is similar to Burke-class destroyer, df21 is close to the Pershing missile.

[@SSGTWinters]

@@stc2828 yeah no the bulk of the military forces are based of Russian prototypes and current tech stolen from Russian firms or "acquired" if you followed russian media and headlines with in the defense industry (which you can do for free on the internet) the hearts of their machines are still 10-15 years behind US/NATO forces, their second short coming is their training they spend more time learning party think and doctrine than actual warfighting, their third flaw is no actual near peer force on force history yes they have crushed small terror groups or fought some minor skirmishes with other nations.... but no where have they had to fight a near peer nation. they lack in that. they lack in tactics they lack funds, everything isnt rosey in china and their current lockdowns, scandals and whinnie the poohs tantrums and on going purges of his rivals welll.... its not doing china favors . the belts and roads is dying as more and more nations citizens wake up and smell the reality that only china not them stands to gain. at this point im willing to bet the Chinese couldn't with stand a war in any capacity longer than say 6 months. before internal strife takes over starvation drives even the most "loyal" solider to surrender and china's weak infrastructure collapses under NATO/UN strikes . fuck china fuck russia and fuck commies

[@jeffreypierson2064]

You forget that in a first island war, Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea would also be involved. The ships the US sold to those countries would all data link and the PLAN would have a short and interesting life, as multiple countries fired on it.

[@zl7491]

I found this a generally unbiased channel.

[@naughtyfrog8257]

there will be no ground operation in the melaka straits, the relationship between ASEAN and China will be one based on mutual commercial and political interests. in fact the US should not assume that the Melaka Straits and SCS littoral states (Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Vietnam) would support an embargo of chinese shipping through these waters.

[@phillip_iv_planetking6354]

Not when China keeps claiming areas that do not belong to them.

[@piojulian64]

True that. . . Westoids willfully forget their "world" includes N.A., Western Europe, Australia, N.Z., South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan only. . . S.E.A., perhaps only Singapore would somewhat tow the line. . .

[@akirasean4080]

@@piojulian64 Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't Vietnam, Malaysia, & Indonesia have a large anti-China sentiment??

[@gpegsus7151]

@@phillip_iv_planetking6354 like where?

[@phillip_iv_planetking6354]

@@gpegsus7151 9 dash line....

[@Redsson56]

Landing on a carrier is a particularly challenge task for a pilot. Making a drone that can reliably land in various conditions on a carrier is hard.

[@mprooveit3588]

But F35s already essentially land themselves on carriers.

[@tonysu8860]

AI should probably eliminate the problem completely eventually. The programming should be quite straightforward with little mystery, it would only take time to build a 97%+ reliable solution.

[@bamxire8845]

Good point. Never thought about it. But the comments below are right in the near future the problems pilots once faced will be nearly consigned to history with new tech advancements one would think.

[@pax4370]

China nad India should consider cooperating for a peaceful and prosperous Asia💝🤝

[@glyphsuritos6588]

Yeh right, good FOOKIN joke. How can India trust china…….. china is too scheming and conniving. China doesnt have friends, they only have clients and vassals. If India cooperates with china, they will eventually get betrayed by china. 100%, can’t trust CCP. The only reason why now china is asking all of Asia for “cooperation” is because they saw how russia is getting their ass beat by Ukraine and NATO. China scheming/copying as always wants to create their own version of nato in Asia after burning the bridge of all friendly relations in the South Asia SEA. Can’t trust china, scared of US and EU. India should be aligning themselves away from china. Only doing trade as much as possibly needed but never to the point of building an alliance. CCP is too dangerous. There is a reason why no1 wants to join china’s nato except North Korea, there is a reason for it, you dummy CCP china 🐕

[@VectorGhost]

Lmao that will never ever happen considering Chinese ideology. China only cares about China

[@willyjimmy8881]

Why would India trust china for anything?

[@zeflute4586]

U need to spell better Haiyaa!

[@user-ln9ys8og8o]

never gonna happen, you should be content that Indians havn't claim Hongkong is part of Inida yet, because Hongkong used to be colonized by their master British.

[@zhli4238]

At 2:06 you showed an image of a missile launch, that’s significant too. It is believed that was a DF-21 (misnamed as YJ-21) carrier killer ballistic missile launched from a VLS on ship. That means it is no longer a coastal defense missile but a sea controlling missile.

[@leto428]

DF-21 and YJ-21 are completely different missiles.

[@stc2828]

@@leto428 They have very similar warheads, just different first-stage rocket boosters.

[@leto428]

@@stc2828 DF-21's diameter is larger than YJ-21.

[@user-hj8mz3hp3s]

@@stc2828 if it was to me i would have fired yj 21 from type 055 on ticonderogas and burkes so that carrier becomes defencless

[@stc2828]

@@user-hj8mz3hp3s ? why choose, realistically when you are firing so many you would target every ship with a few or a dozen.

[@peterchen3088]

Please please Chinese H-20. Stealth Bomber

[@user-em3kh6hb5o]

you mean..... water? lol

[@pavelrak8906]

Not necessary to say "thank you for watching" because "we thank you for creating those videos and oportunity to watch" :)

[@SamuHell782]

Otis is going through puberty and an underwater frog voice change. You be you Otis!

[@ML-po6vy]

We are slowly moving to 'Drone Carrier'

[@SisodiaAbhishek]

Great audiophile collection..

[@alf3071]

Hey, can you make a video explaining how stealth planes hide their own radar? because the nose can't be radar reflective or it wouldn't work, is there a movable cover that hides the radar when it's turned off?

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

It is in the recent stealth video kzbin.info/www/bejne/ipPQo4yQfKeAeck

[@amarr8634]

He has an excellent explanation of this but short and sweet is they angle it so incoming electromagnetic waves are reflected mostly away from the source. Again, his explanation is much more comprehensive so check it out.

[@jonathantkent5945]

China will build at least 12 aircraft carriers and hundreds of destroyers to protect its territory

[@Gongolongo]

Tilted up and using low probability intercept radars. AESA is a good way of doing this since it doesn't emit a strong wave on a single band.

[@tadficuscactus]

India doesn't have aircraft carriers, they have aircraft curriers.

[@IchigoKurosakicool]

"LMAO IM DED THAT'S THE BEST JOKE ANYONE HAS EVER MADE IN THE HISTORY OF HUMANKIND" 🤡🤡

[@raghunandanbs2005]

So funny ha ha ha ha ha ha ha hahahhahahahahahahhahah

[@youngpan2434]

哈哈哈哈，夺笋啊！

[@pareshprajapati7916]

well it's aircraft carriers or curriers...........final decision comes only when come face to face . curriers are ready for show. 🇮🇳🕉️💗🙏

[@faizalbarkah2617]

Most of your replies is indian, maybe im the one that not indian

[@donscheid97]

Something that is being missed. Operational experience is a major factor in being able to conduct a war. The Pentagon needs to ignore this, so they do not underestimate an enemy. Then cheer when it proves to be relevant.

[@jpierce2l33t]

I've become very fond of the Chinese camo patterns on their missle platforms (trucks), the blue pattern and the green look especially intimidating. This is the first I've noticed the white/gray, seen on the trucks carrying the drones. That blocky urban style camo is pretty sweet!

[@kevinc8633]

Really? I found them to be rather garish. The blue marine uniforms also stand out quite a bit on land, which is where they will be operating. The Chinese hardware just isn't as color coordinated as the Western or even Russian ones, not that it's a beauty contest. In fact, the jankness may be a style of its own.

[@knight6577]

Nah I'm an Indian and it's a reality that even we realise. We are well aware that for now only the US can stop them in the Indian ocean

[@thegeneralist7527]

Anyone who defends freedom, equality and the rule of law is a brother. We stand on guard for democracy.

[@zolikoff]

Wingspan: "We have to estimate it from pictures, ~14m looks like" Empty Weight: "We know it's EXACTLY 6350 kg!"

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

It was on a sign at an airshow. Take it with a pinch of salt.

[@zolikoff]

@@Millennium7HistoryTech I understand, it's just a good joke out of context

[@sachinmesta4238]

Beautiful collection of headphones especially Meze Elite

[@SpawnofChaos2010]

I don't think its even a contest anymore. While China might not be the world's strongest superpower right now, their trajectory - along with that of the United States, suggests its only a matter of time before China becomes the pre-eminent global force. I am of the belief that quite a few nations allied with the US will switch allegiances in the coming years as China continues to flex its economic and military strength. I am also of the opinion that any military action undertaken by China in the Western Pacific will not be enacted on their own but as part of a much larger coalition. Love your channel btw!

[@pax4370]

❤️

[@blazingkhalif2]

yeah except china's GDP growth has consistently been slowing due to low birth rates and their population is already starting to decrease.

[@baronvonlimbourgh1716]

Countries switching alliance, or more probably seeking neutrality of some sort, is completely on the usa itself. It has caused a lot if issues over the decades without much regard for anything, not even it's own population. I'm glad the power structure is balancing out more, the planet really can not take another 50 years of usa hegemony.

[@user-hj8mz3hp3s]

I think france will be the first from europe.Especially when aussirs ditched them for diesel submarines due to us pressure

[@Gongolongo]

@@blazingkhalif2 Their GDP is still doing incredibly well. In fact, their GDP PPP is already way bigger than the US's. We could only dream of a 6% GDP increase here in the US. Low birth rates has nothing to do with it. Low birth rates is being offset by automation. In 10 years, a working Chinese person produces over 10x more value than a currently retired Chinese person. Currently that multiplier sits somewhere in the 20x range. Don't forget almost half of China is still not even developed and has plenty of potential.

[@spoddie]

Indians upset? Never! They never get triggered.

[@defencebangladesh4068]

😅

[@samhughes1747]

Dude! I wanna know about your audio equipment!! I think I see a Meze 99, and that’s clearly either a 4XX or 5XX series Sennheiser set, but I’m unclear on the rest of that bar, and I’m also curious about the stuff below them and/or speakers!

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Thanks for the interest. I have plans, for an indefinite future, to start a hi-fi channel too. Meze 99 Silver / Grado SR80x/ Sennheiser HD 599 Special Edition / Status CB1/ and old pair of the cheapest SONY bluetooth for the gym. - ROTEL A11 Tribute/ ARCAM CDS50 Cd Player / Loxje A30 headphones amplifier (but it can drive speakers too) / Gustard X16 DAC / JVC UX D150 tube all in one (it punches WAAAAY above its weight) / Tannoy Gold 7 active speakers/ Wharfedale Diamond 220. Source is a mini-pc with an external CD player for ripping.

[@AG-pm3tc]

@@Millennium7HistoryTech i honestly was thinking you are the kind of dude that would be into audio, that's awosome to see!

[@samhughes1747]

@@Millennium7HistoryTech, Oh, heck yeah! It’d be fantastic to see your attention to detail paid to hi-fi! For instance, it’d be fun to get your take on the Grados!

[@lordsqueak]

Hmm. Small carriers operating drones might actually sound like a good idea. You can do the same job as a regular carrier, albeit at a smaller scale, but at a smaller cost. And with the small cost, you can operate them in numbers to make up for the differences in scale. Also being smaller ships, you don't really need the same protection, as sinking one of them isn't as devastating. (because you probably have 2-3 more.) I wonder if that might be the future, as an alternative to the super carriers of today.

[@gcharny8022]

I used to think the same but understanding the situation around carriers a bit more the problem of smaller carriers is economies of scale. The extra logistical burden your putting on yourself is tough and it gets worse when you get into combat rigours, there are only so many drydocks that can handle military vessels needing repairs so you can end up with bad force sustainment in the long term. Of course China might just try and ignore that reality but I doubt that like the USSR that will end well for them

[@lordsqueak]

@@gcharny8022 I'm thinking, the drone carriers would be combined with missile cruisers. That way they can do all the unmanned strikes from one place. (for example a cruise missile strike, followed by drones to do damage assessment. Or drone scouting to pick targets for the strike.) That should make things a lot simpler logistics wise. Since they don't need to be large vessels,, they could fit wherever a normal cruiser would. Mind you, I'm thinking ahead into the future when drones will be advanced enough to carry out the roles of manned aircraft. Carriers are very expensive in both cost and logistics, and you need to defend it using lots of other ships. But if you have smaller cruiser sized ships, and more of them. Then they would not be such a high value target, that the enemy would do everything they can to sink it. And if you really wanted to, you could still build a carrier strike force with lots of mini carriers. But maybe I'm wrong, maybe you just need the size to house all the stores and logistics around them?

[@Gongolongo]

@@gcharny8022 with china's massive ship building infrastructure, I think they would be the best to support such an idea.

[@gcharny8022]

@@Gongolongo not all shipyards are equal - military shipyards can handle military ships, but a commercial shipyard will not have the facilities

[@gcharny8022]

@@lordsqueak but there it’s simpler to just do what they do now which is have a hanger that fits Drones natively on said missile cruiser.

[@benganchan1420]

Shanghai’s Jiangnan Shipyard which is the largest commercial shipyard in the world considers naval vessels under 110,000 ton deadweight as small boats. It has built container ships, cruise ships of 240,000 ton , 220,000 ton deadweight respectively for global customers

[@kevinc8633]

That audiophile setup in the background.

[@rgandblue]

Wow... You have some collection of 🎧

[@78Ratje]

The gentleman definitely has a love and enjoyment of a quality sound.

[@user-jd7gh2ef4s]

If you convert a AWACS plane to a drone, what will be left? A flying saucer 🤔😉

[@larsnystrom6698]

Why do they have a plane hanging under the flying saucer?

[@sohrabroozbahani4700]

I am currently struggling against these scenarios of chains of war in CMANO, even after wiping out everything worth of spitting at across the first and second island chains by more cruise and ballistic missiles than God, it is still a nerve wrecking struggle to reach out even as far as okinawa without a proper carrier force... PLAN will need them, and they will need a lot of them...

[@digitalpostman]

Remind me the sinking of Yamato, For US Carriers the GJ-11 and hypersonic missles will just be like Corsair and Hellcat fighters during WWII.

[@min-jd5lb]

Destroyer-based ballistic missiles are for enemy destroyers, not supercarriers, the size of it is not enough to destroy that big of a target. That task is still in the hand of land based ballistic missiles. GJ-11 is land attack, and has questionable anti-ship capability, and it won't be much since the weapon bay size is confined. So... not quite

[@tonysu8860]

We'll see if any window of opportunities exist for the Chinese (or any other potential adversary with hypersonic missile technology). Reportedly the USN already has tested, qualified and is deploying an early upgrade of its existing defense systems that should/might be able to hit a hypersonic missile. But of course everything is relative and untested in real world combat conditions.

[@kevinc8633]

As far as I can tell, the PLAN would have to rely on recon drones to provide real-time targeting data. These drones would be relatively easy mark for carrier-borne fighters.

[@min-jd5lb]

@@kevinc8633 Real-time targeting data is obtained by satellites, and the searching head of the missiles can locate the ship within the area that ship can possibly maneuver after its launch. The only drone they use, WZ-8, is for missile strike result analysis, which determines whether more missiles are needed to sink the ship. And that drone is no easy target, it can reach a speed over 4 mach and height of 40km, no anti-air missile can reach it.

[@kevinc8633]

@@min-jd5lb Satellites are just not good enough for real time targeting - they can be avoided, blinded or shot down and cannot be count on in a real conflict. Like you mentioned, it would require at a minimum the use of warhead's own sensors. But the plasma build up around the missile would limit its sensor capabilities, and given the speed it is traveling at, the sensor coverage would also be highly limited. In addition, the US carriers can move at least 34 knots per hour, greatly increasing the area of search necessary. I also don't see why they would relegate the WZ-8 to just post-strike analysis when it clearly can be useful for obtaining real-time targeting info. Successful targeting of carriers would likely require a fusion of data from a net-work of sensors, with drones being an important element.

[@xamanikia13]

We Indians are upset because it's true

[@Anuj-2]

1:22 lmao

[@salamanderpete]

More gold from M7*. Keep up the good work my man 👍🏻

[@tamzidkarim9402]

Otis you naughty boy😂

[@v11r]

Could you talk about the AN-30 who flew over Sweden?

[@james_l4337]

The *19* or is it CVN 19 is 004 carrier (underconstruction) supposedly *may be* nuclear powered, that is the 2nd carrier u shown 0:04 *18* or CVN 18 is 003 supposedly coming either June or later this year (too hard to hide this big ship)

[@cannonfodder4376]

Yet another informative video as always.

[@evilshews]

It almost appears like imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but. My assessment, is based on cosmetics. And not whatever real capability the chinese configure into there fleet, although, i wonder about the choice to go with 2 lifts. And only 3 catapults. From what i understand, that can have a significant effect on operational efficency

[@tonysu8860]

I suspect... The Type 003 design was and is intended to be an iterative design, mainly intended as China's first implementations of newly invented technologies. Also, the drawback you mention probably applies only to a sustained operation. If China intends to use the Type 003 mainly to support a first strike, then a lower operational temp is likely not an issue. It might be a lot more demanding to design an aircraft carrier comparable to the Gerald Ford, and maybe the fewer elevators and catapults are consistent with the Type 003's estimated output of its non-nuclear power.

[@thomasjoyce7910]

In this discussion, 'contest' would be a better verb to use than 'contrast'. Am I able to say ANYTHING in Italian? No. I'm just trying to be helpful.

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Noted. Thank you.

[@tonysu8860]

Since China's upcoming carriers are all supposed to have EM catapults, there is probably more options even for bigger AWACS. But, unlike US naval aircraft designs every Chinese counterpart is already larger so on a similar sized carrier would carry fewer aircraft in numbers. This may mean that comparing Chinese carrier force and American carrier force can't be done well based on simply counting numbers, but would have to be done based on qualitative evaluation of each aircraft and then summing up the total capability. Since Chinese specs are based entirely on their own word, it'll be entirely speculative how each force compares.

[@rdablock]

showing off your headphones I see

[@leiyue1411]

in Liaoning and Shandong, Chinese use Z8 for awacs

[@harrypothead4575]

Sir, I read a article in south China morning post and there it mentioned that construction of 004 started late last year (2021). Is this wrong info or is it true?

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Yes, they started but it seems that they stopped/re-planned waiting for some 003 lessons.

[@mikapeltokorpi7671]

US has deployed drones in carriers already, has it not?

[@MMA-gb6to]

he meant drone fighter jet

[@loktom4068]

Those are not made in USA. But rather from the nation they hated the most.

[@Gongolongo]

Testing only

[@user-hi7jk6fu3f]

@@loktom4068 Almost nothing is made in the USA

[@zeflute4586]

I've seen they tested drones on carriers

[@fatgirlboy9341]

Don’t think it is too difficult for the US to put combat drones on the carrier also

[@IsaacKuo]

If there were the will to do so, then yes. But the US military (as well as politicians holding the purse strings) have had a lot of skepticism of UCAVs. UCAV programs have struggled because of this, so at this point we're lucky that they even consider the job of an unarmed tanker conceivably doable by a drone. And of course, there's the political clusterfudge of F-35. Even if there were enough of a will to seriously go forward with replacing manned combat carrier aircraft with combat drones, the politicians in charge of funding such a program would be rightfully wary of creating another multi-decade boondoggle with middling results. It's kind of hopeless. Unless there's some war where a bunch of F-18s get shot down by UCAVs, no one's going to take ownership of this issue and demand the US military get real about UCAVs. That said, it's possible that we're looking at UCAVs all wrong. The war in Ukraine is showing us that maybe drones shouldn't be thought of as weapons platforms of their own, but rather a way to direct firepower from surface based weapons (like artillery). The truth is, air-to-air combat is something of a rarity, with most aircraft kills accomplished by SAMs anyway. So, a drone might not need to have its own firepower - it might rely upon surface based missile platforms to provide the firepower. In that case, it might not take too much to convert the USN tanker into a radar toting anti-air platform (relying upon other platforms to do the shooting).

[@willyjimmy8881]

They do already. It may be your idea of 'combat drone' is different than the Navy's.

[@user-re5qf7xc3d]

America military is the best, military able to watch game of throne

[@yang5159]

Asean will never blockade or anti china. Asean needs china and india to survive

[@FirstDagger]

One criticism, the slide switching sound appears to be mono, not stereo, and only plays on the left audio channel in this video. I would suggest a higher quality sound for future videos.

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

You are right, it didn't seem annoying to me. Noted.

[@rainmanben]

Till date I don't think China has the capability to complete the next CG

[@carldavies4776]

Excellent video...do we know if there's any plans for an AEW drone anywhere? Seems that a drone replacement for the Viking Hawkeye and Tanker role would be possible with a single type?

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

No, as far as I know. I haven't seen anything.

[@Gongolongo]

GJ-11 has its own sensor suite and was promoted as being able to carry out reconnaissance.

[@zchen27]

AEW Drone would probably fall under the Loyal Wingman category. Basically forwards deployed expendable radars on the cheapest possible airframe with the expectation that they will be detected and shot down.

[@gustavoboscardin9351]

Totally out of the subject, but are those paintings made by yourself?

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Yes, one of my hobbies

[@defencebangladesh4068]

@@Millennium7HistoryTech সুন্দর

[@Uriel77200]

When the heck are we going to invent shields! Force fields vs kinetic energy.

[@timhafley5177]

Didn't the Chinese recover A American Drone a while back.We should always have a fail-safe system.biuld in any sensitive military project.

[@simulatedpilot3441]

There is an MP3 player in the JF-17 facts

[@nickc6882]

Meze 99 Classics - Nice 👍🏻

[@nathanminten]

I still don't know where you are from. But I want to!

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

I am Italian but I live in the UK

[@toucancheney9091]

The author of the second image of 003 (which is CG) is actually here on KZbin. @西葛西造舰

[@FrugalPCOG]

Why put a disc on top at all if it's a non rotating awacs system?

[@tonysu208]

The USN is already using AI to land aircraft, there's no reason to believe China can't do the same especially with it's drones so I doubt operating drones off aircraft carriers would be especially challenging

[@KimJongSkill492]

Can you do an episode on your headphones? Looks like you’ve got some pretty nice units there!

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

i don't think many people are interested, on this channel.

[@silversurfergw]

must be the carrier version of J 31

[@WhiskeyTango84]

Is that a Sennheiser ? Which one of those headsets would you say is the best overall? Love your video as well!

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

The Meze 99

[@nathanielalaburgDelhi]

Nothing of quality ever goes in the same sentence as china......China....... ask the Russians and their tires.....🤣🤣🤣

[@yogaboy55]

I don’t understand. The Chinese have developed a Hypersonic AS “Carrier Killer”. The US is on the cusp of multiple Hypersonic weapons coming online in the next 2-8 years, just in time to wack these Type 003 and 004. What do know that we don’t?

[@anonymoususer3561]

I was thinking about boats... Have you seen that picture with two ship models side by side (The Santa María and some big ass ancient non-blue water Chinese ship). It would be amazing if they ended up building way bigger than supercarrier size, following that old trend

[@Gongolongo]

Ming Dynasty treasure ships. But I don't think China wants a big supercarrier.

[@tonysu8860]

The bigger the ship, the more special and advanced the propulsion has to be. As of today, only the US has that capability to build the Gerald Ford. The Type 003 will be severely limited by its own special non-nuclear propulsion and it's unknown how capable the Typ3 004 will be since it's unlikely the Chinese have any kind of idea how to build a more powerful engine than what is being installed in the Type 003.

[@mike4769]

Warfdale?. Audiophile also?

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Yeeep...

[@leyasep5919]

5:33 it's called a "mesh" network. De rien.

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Good point, thanks!

[@leyasep5919]

@@Millennium7HistoryTech you're welcome :-) thanks for all the videos !

[@aaasss4077]

Hope the Chinese keep building carriers. Maybe launch one a year.Give them away under One Belt. Can't think of a faster way to bankrupt an opponent than equipping them with a nuclear powered target.

[@user-nl2js1bk1p]

Us military spending is actually a bit too high, I suggest you get out of the Western Pacific to save hundreds of billions of dollars to improve your crumbling infrastructure. I think the daily life of the American people is more important than American hegemony.

[@user-ln9ys8og8o]

Americans‘ high level life style based on their hegemony. It's impossible to convince them that they shoul stop sucking blood from the whole world and walk away from the fleshpots.

[@jvs333]

The only ones going bankrupt is the US. The world is dumping the dollar, establishing a new transfer system to bypass the SWIFT. The global oil countries are abandoning the petro-dollar. The US is buried in a realistic $35 trillion debt with no countries willing to buy any more junk US bonds. In the next few years the US will have painted itself into a corner it can’t “war” itself out of or bully its way out.

[@boddapatiraja]

India also have two aircraft carriers

[@ciaspecialactivitiesdivisi5867]

They rushed this carrier how we rushed the F-35 the Chinese are gonna lose that first day of the war

[@anonymoususer3561]

Nice

[@manolitocabaguio6089]

USUALLY DID I SUPPOSED........

[@ashishpatel350]

they probably want these to invade Taiwan.

[@merocaine]

Did you buy a new camera? Your looking pretty high Def!

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Panasonic Lumix S5, full frame. I am still not using it for all videos but we will get there.

[@merocaine]

@@Millennium7HistoryTech nice, you can see the quality!

[@kiro9257]

Jesus! There are a LOT of Chinese bots in this comment section.

[@cccb2878]

Are you that retired friend of 007？

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Probably the 007 will have the international moniker "CNS James Bond". 😂

[@nepenthy9804]

some models you showed are fan made

[@Elysian_Angel_]

OTIS should ask Alexia out on a date if he cares so much about music streaming 🤔

[@comontoshi]

Hmmm . . . what’s up the Chinese and Soviet Russian carriers? No catapults? Don’t understand steam? 🤭😂

[@tadficuscactus]

Is the 004 planned to be nuclear powered?

[@oddy1637]

Yes.

[@chikamazri5817]

Not confirmed.

[@oddy1637]

@@chikamazri5817 I am a spy I know better so shut UP!

[@Gongolongo]

@@chikamazri5817 It was confirmed by a pretty reputable source. I think it was PLA Daily which is the military's own news channel.

[@worldfight6032]

Yes, the power will be greater than the USS Ford

[@tempbamboo8548]

Like Russia, there are many channel saying how strong the Russia military equipment are. That's true, their fighter jet, vessel, tanks.. everything looks so good. From a computer point of views, if you just look at the hardware like CPUS, rams and even processing power. Then all looks good. However, no channel is really investigating the 'software' side of the military in China and Russia from a military operation point of view. Russia bought chinese clone of Michelin tire for their moving truck so cannot coped with the landscape in Ukraine. Because those tire are poor quality. So can you imagine the chinese military will use good quality of stuff? Anyway this is just a tips of the iceberg.

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

I have at least a couple of videos about chinese training and readiness, Binkov and Military Aviation History discussed Russia at length. There is no lack of analysis at all.

[@FATMAN_tactical]

White writing on a yellow back ground is not very well defined, at least for me. Maybe I'm just a little yellow colorblind but I can barely read Otis's comments.

[@FATMAN_tactical]

My pc using nightlight mode(low blue light) doesn't help though.

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Noted, thank you.

[@jvs333]

With all the satellites China has been launching I’m sure there’s a satellite for every US ship/submarine/base in the entire pacific

[@likklej8]

Its the cosmic yankee scarer that China have developed back engineering alien technology. Remember its the South China Sea.

[@phillip_iv_planetking6354]

I hope they are not going to use the flopping fish.

[@benb5891]

flying aircraft have same kind of wing becuse all bird have same type of wing dug unless u want to fly slow like 🦋

[@Adolf.Kittler_]

China super carrier love them thoo ❤️

[@thebesttheworldhastoofferchann]

How much do the chicoms pay you?

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

asked a for a contract clause such that I am always paid one dollar more than you are.

[@obsidianjane4413]

Imitation, flattery, etc.

[@fjordsiekl1492]

No, we Indians are not upset Otis. Brahmos can counter naval ships very effectively, but we are also developing hypersonic long range Brahmos-2 and Angi-P (ballistic missile) is also being modified for anti-carrier role. By 2025, we will have both of these capabilities, any agressive posture by Plan will be met with very fast, long range Indian missiles.

[@ex0duzz]

That's if the brahmos doesn't accidentally launch and do a turn and land in Pakistan or even India. Also, India is totally reliant on foreign countries to do war, especially globally. India relies on other countries gps and permission to use them, and reliant on foreign countries for crucial tech to replace equipment. In war once they are destroyed India cannot quickly replace anything.

[@xxhughtg]

Why dont make a video to cover ur Hi-Fi system?

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

In a yet undetermined future I will probably open a Hi-Fi channel, but I don't have time now.

[@xxhughtg]

@@Millennium7HistoryTech Hahahaha mate we understand. The PLA navy probly gonna keep you working like a mule this year.

[@laughingleopard5226]

On drones, I'll sleep on it until someone develops (cargo) container based launchers.

[@leongcheeyung546]

I cant help but notice you are a big audiophile. We have two common topics of interest. Do you have videos or another channel dedicated for audio?

[@Millennium7HistoryTech]

Yes, but it will be in an undetermined future. I have no time now. I need to go full time on YT to do that.