I searched brazing cast iron and you channel came up. Then I searched autocollimator and you channel came up haha. That’s a follow
@dankolar60665 жыл бұрын
And, after you have finished the project, you will have a spectacular paperweight. Cheers. Thank you for sharing.
@TheStefanskoglund15 жыл бұрын
It is a spectacular paper weight but also a very accurate sled which is really good to have the next time he needs something like that.
@dankolar60665 жыл бұрын
Stefan Skoglund - Agreed, but where better to store this artifact than atop your important papers-where you may find it again. As opposed to on the bottom shelf, at the back of some forgotten cabinet. We all have jigs stacked away that fit tools which we no longer own. It happens ....
@trex2835 жыл бұрын
I'm a wood worker and learn so much from watching machinists. Thanks
@alanmahaffey32655 жыл бұрын
I am always impressed at the multiple steps and tools needed to get a truly precision machine set up and working. As someone who has no experience in a machine shop I also enjoy the set-up of the various machine tools and the thought process of how you decide which one to use in a given situation.
@lucianonougueiradevasconce13675 жыл бұрын
I have learned more watching your videos than in other sources, that I want to thank you. I have the same kind of old machine and I've been searching information how to recondition it in my own workshop but no one knows in my country, is very sad. Now with I learned from you I'll start, I thank you so much.
@steveweckel62795 жыл бұрын
Awesome video...your patience and descriptions of the processes were most welcome.
@fiorevitola8805 жыл бұрын
Great class on how to make tools for a particular operation of the measure on the ways. As always it's a pleasure watching you come along with the plainer project.
@ccswede4 жыл бұрын
Watched the cast iron piece made at foundry. Amazing process for a person familiar with woodworking. Recycled auto brakes
@jerrycoleman26105 жыл бұрын
Keith, I like the idea of using the sled to mirror the ways. I’m looking forward to the next step thanks for sharing.!.!.!.
@yambo595 жыл бұрын
Your patience in rebuilding these machines is extroardinary, this will really look and work good in your shop.
@saschaoswald4805 жыл бұрын
If I took that to my local foundry and asked for a one off, they'd look at me as if I had two heads! Then they'd quote me a "go-away" price, and then I would go away;-) Really looking forward to seeing the autocollimation of the ways, as I'm planning something similar with my milling machine. Great video as always!
@MaturePatriot5 жыл бұрын
Challenging, but made simpler by having the proper machine tools. Great work.
@GeorgeWMays5 жыл бұрын
Ultra-cool. Super spiffy. A ton of fun to watch. Thank you very much for sharing.
@wi11y19605 жыл бұрын
I always loved milling. Something so calming about milling.
@gagasmancave88595 жыл бұрын
Keith hope you and the family are safe were seeing all about those storms chap
@larryshaw65175 жыл бұрын
Very interesting Keith, now I understand what you were talking about earlier. Thanks so much for clarifying.
@SteveSummers5 жыл бұрын
Thanks Keith👍😎
@piotrlenarczyk58035 жыл бұрын
Thank you for video. To my best knowledge most economical is direct use of stone (rock), but it requiers separate tools or even whole machine park. Moreover it is cheaper and more usable, than modern concrete composite (fiber glass; carbides; silicon loams; et cetera - mostly below 50um/0.002inch), and provides better mechanical parameters (but still a lot worse than steel). Cast iron requiers specialized formation - above mentioned materials could be prepared in low temps. Especially first few generations of prototype could be made from concrete composite with welded reinforcement and some plywood box. Cast iron possess it's own advantages:)
@WillyBemis5 жыл бұрын
Thank you Keith!
@mikesmathers57525 жыл бұрын
Nice Work, Keith. Maybe I am being influenced by ABOM79 too much, but roughing that in sure did look like a job for a shaper! Keep up the good work! It is nice to see the big K&T in action!
@donmittlestaedt11175 жыл бұрын
Thank you Keith. That was interesting.
@cavemansmancave90255 жыл бұрын
Nice piece, Keith. As I watched this, I was thinking of other ways to make that sled. None were clearly better. For future such casting work, tabs or bosses could be added to the casting design to provide clamping locations for workholding. Not necessarily needed for this piece but nice features to include for machining. Thanks, John
@jrb_sland50665 жыл бұрын
He could also add various tapped holes on the sides, top and ends for similar reasons. No need to do it now, he can wait until some obvious reason appears [or follows him home!]. Perhaps some tee-slots?
@ROBRENZ5 жыл бұрын
Enjoyed Keith! ATB, Robin
@brambruijnzeel5 жыл бұрын
Again a nice one Keith, thank you and greetings from the Netherlands, Bram
@forrestaddy96445 жыл бұрын
From what you've shown on the video, you're only guessing the sled has full bearing in the V and the V's are synnetrical, have the same orientation, and are parallel. Check the sled bearing by applying a little blue to the bed V etc. Check the top with the level just for info, and do the same for the other V. You can correct the sled's bearing in the V by scraping. Autocollimator checks are fussy work. You don't want wobble on the sled to influence linearity readings. I realize this is a century old planer and you have an autocollimator you want to put to use. A planer bed is a perfect application for two-axis autocollimator linearity checks but your nice old New Haven planer is a bit too lightly built and limber for a serious metrology campaign. However, it is a good place to sharpen your optical tooling skills. Go for it even though the results may not be perfect. You (and we) will learn some valuable lessons along the way. Incidentally, have you found a way to video through the autocollimatot's optics? And, by the way, an autocollimator won't test parallelism and planarity without special set-up. Parallelism is better tested with the Kingway. Here's a hard fact: no one test for machine tool grade level, planarity, parallelism, circularity, cylindricity, concentricity, etc exists, not even laser interferometry. Optical, level, mechanical tests all require multiple means of testing to prove all bearing features in a way bearing system are flat, linear, parallell, perpendicular etc.
@forrestaddy96445 жыл бұрын
@chris0tube I have limited experience with autocollimators but I have seen them in use by techs who knew what they were doing in 1973. They roped off quite an area in an open shop so their lines of sight were clear and undisturbed. Space heaters were shut off etc. They had a whole array of fancy mirrors, prisms etc to support setting a very large planer's bedways in plane to support a coming project requiring certificated machine tools to do the work. They were careful and exacting, using repeat zeros, mulitple checks and cross-checks. There was no doubt a second crew following behind using another brand of apparatus would validate the first crew's settings. We were instructed to not bother them but for a 32 year old machinist two machines over got quite a education just by watching them, far beyond what I learned in my two month optical tooling rotation when I was an apprentice. I suspect Keith is using this autocollimator project to introduce himself and us to its use to validate linearity in his planer ways. Not the best test example for this application but good for training as there will be several influences like temperature, floor deflection, etc to account for besides tweaking the jacks to wring the best possible linearity from the bedways. It's a worthy endeavor and probably shouldn't be scoffed at given the educational benefits that hopefully accrue. As for the Kingway apparatus, yes, there is more usable geometric data to be gleaned from this simple collection of apparatus for the axis by axis inspection of way systems than any other system short of laser interferometry. However its sensitivity is hampered by its 10 arc second spirit levels. Higher resolution levels will provide greater sensitivity at the cost of far longer settling time. Too bad LVDT pendulum level technology can't be adapted but my undestanding is the mass of the pendulum bob is a critical factor. The Kingway system would therefore have to be redesigned if, say, 1 arc second resolution was a requirement. Imagine the parading placards: "More significant digits!" "Less cost to determine them!" Slogans not suited for a street chant by unruly protesters but they encapsulate our ever-elusive goal as we chivvy and prod yesteryear's sow's ear machine tools to silk purse geometrical perfection to meet coming manufacturing challenges.
@akcender5 жыл бұрын
yes, i was thinking at minimum he would have to relieve the center of the v so it would be bearing on the wide and narrow end even if the angle was a bit off
@lazyh-online48395 жыл бұрын
@@forrestaddy9644 hey man, ive seen you on so many forums, great to see you posting stuff on here too! Always loving the great info you provide 👍
@fabioth2834 жыл бұрын
autocollimator is very good for check slide like this.also have one other one collimator,with a steel wire.For use a autocollimator like that on V,need just to be sure the leveling is ok,with step by 200mm.Also,for me,if i need to do a work like that,for start i scraping for correct the leveling,and check by level,and later when the bed is ok with leveling i check with autocollimator the straightness and parallelism by the V
@RagsdaleCreek5 жыл бұрын
Nice job Keith!👍
@Larry1942Will5 жыл бұрын
I've often thought that there would be stone loss during grinding so things couldn't come out really accurate. I do profile grinding of HSS knives and know that there is loss of wheel diameter but the wheels are very narrow to work into the shapes. A final pass is made after dressing the wheel and changing the angle of the knife slightly so only a very small amount of steel is being removed.
@jlg48805 жыл бұрын
Pity it didn't have "RUCKER" cast into it--might be worthwhile to have some appliques generated by a 3D printer so they're ready to apply. Now, all that little cast iron sled needs is a matching nice little wooden case for storage.
@incubatork5 жыл бұрын
3D printing takes a lot more time and knowledge to be able to draw in say fusion 360 or tinkercad then printing something that size will take hours, then you have to finish the printed parts to take out lines, get the draft angles correct, with wood (which Keith is used to working)its far quicker and easier to do with a saw, a few nails, plain and a bit of sandpaper, by the time the 3d drawing is done it could be made and finished in wood. you can get more detail in a 3d print like name etc. but If desired he could just have printed his name a few thou tall and glue to the wood.
@jlg48805 жыл бұрын
@@incubatork My idea was to make lettered appliques that could be glued to a wooden pattern, which was pretty much a standard practice when patterns were predominately made by hand.
@katelights3 жыл бұрын
for a part that he is not going to sell, such detail work only serves to make the casting process more difficult.
@RRINTHESHOP5 жыл бұрын
Nice piece. Came out great.
@michaelclark17175 жыл бұрын
You should do a shop tour soon.
@elsdp-45605 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU...for sharing. Watched and very much enjoyed.
@MattysWorkshop5 жыл бұрын
Great job as always Kieth, thank you. Matty
@jessefoulk5 жыл бұрын
At the surface grinder view of the video 12:18 Whats that belt/pulley project in the background there?
@roberthamilton97305 жыл бұрын
Keith Rucker for President 2020
@KnifemakerKinetic5 жыл бұрын
I am excited to see what the Autocollimator tells you!
@JaapGrootveld5 жыл бұрын
Tank,s Keith, for this nice video. I whis I had a caster neer by.
@sandrammer5 жыл бұрын
Nice casting. You're right to take it easy on the first cuts. Deep in the rough surfaces of a casting may hide some sand or carbides that could harm the cutting edges of your cutters. In addition, the surfaces of castings have the smallest grains and therefor the hardest grains to cut through (unless of course the casting was heat treated or normalized to rework the grain size through out the casting).
@tedmckay5 жыл бұрын
Nice work! I see an old sliding gap-bed lath in the back ground, are we going to see an episode about that?
@DomManInT15 жыл бұрын
As long as the slots in your table run parallel to the travel, you can use pins in the slots to get parallel surfaces.
@PittsS2C15 жыл бұрын
As always, very interesting. Question: Since you will use the sled to prove the ways during scraping, should you also scrape the sled surfaces prior?
@SuperAWaC5 жыл бұрын
if the grinding is precise enough, it's not needed. precision ground surfaces do not require scraping, though they are usually flaked to give oil a place to run in.
@JCisHere7785 жыл бұрын
The piece should be stiff enough to not be deformed considerably while on the magnet, so it should be quite accurate. But he should definately check the fit and in the v-way of the planer. Matching the angles by scraping might be a good Idea (If he wants to use a level to get twist out of the v-way. That would also make it a better master for spotting)
@jonka15 жыл бұрын
@chris0tube We've been here before. Keith has a new toy and needs to use it.
@BaseballNut7194 жыл бұрын
@chris0tube He's can do a much better job than you, that's for certain!
@ypop4175 жыл бұрын
I would thinka matched pair would be helpful Keiith.
@homeryoung74365 жыл бұрын
Thanks Keith
@1969Kakashi5 жыл бұрын
Make sure you put your makers mark on that for the guy that finds and needs it in a hundred years, Keith!
@woodywoodworkerfuller99215 жыл бұрын
Show making the pattern out of wood. Throw a little woodworkin in there. Love your channel, excellent videos & content !! Love Ya !!
@woodywoodworkerfuller99215 жыл бұрын
I was a tad bit hasty. You did at least show the piece. I’d imagine the core of your viewers would be bored with more woodworkin than you showed. Nice job.
@donaldshulman67715 жыл бұрын
Keith -Interesting video, especially the way you clamped down all the parts. How many projects are you working on now? I have lost count !! Also, when will you have an updated shop tour?
@perolovson17155 жыл бұрын
Just for fun it would be interesting to compare the result of the collimator test with the machines iron sledge v. the wooden pattern. If in a hurry, is the pattern a “good enough” part to use? Great video and all ways informative. You might end the video with some metrology to show the accuracy of the part.
@incubatork5 жыл бұрын
Another Interesting bit of gear, would it not have been easier to true up a square bar on all sides, surface grind 2 sides to be the V then flatten one of the corners down to the width/hight needed? quicker machining at least? I'm not looking for faults, i like to know the reasoning for doing things one way rather than another, here to learn sort of speak. thanks for sharing.
@strongspeed3 жыл бұрын
is there another video showing the collimator measurement?
@patricknowak82925 жыл бұрын
For a part like this that is being used in precision work, do you need to have the casting stress relieved or aged before you make the sled? I recall hearing that years ago casting like angle plates were left to age for a few years before being machined.
@windyhillfoundry59405 жыл бұрын
This was stress relieved at 1375° soaked for 2.5 hrs and cooled at a rate of 100° per hour
@WatchWesWork5 жыл бұрын
Why not attach the mirror to your King Way?
@jamesschrum89245 жыл бұрын
When keith puts the table back in the V ways sit in the V's he is working on with this tool he just made. The fit is better at this point to give a better cut when the table moves back and forth. For most of us whom just goof around it is good enough, but for Keith if it is not exact he will do it right. Thanks Keith for the great videos, great work.
@deathk265 жыл бұрын
He covered that in a previous video. One side of the King Way rides on a ball and it's not as stable as he'd like. The way the King Way is set up it's not ideal for a double V-way.
@mrblack615 жыл бұрын
Just what i was thinking.
@deathk265 жыл бұрын
You need to go back and watch the previous video again. The repeatability was poor with the King Way sliding along the double v-way. The ball is made to rest on a flat, not in a v-way. In this case the King Way is most definitely not "more stable and affirmative" than the sled he made which sits tightly in the v-way.
@mrblack615 жыл бұрын
@@deathk26 Just had a look at the previous video, Keith doesnt have it set up well to measure a double V. Loading the tube side of KW so its sat firmly in the V with the levels and or a suitable weight. Ideally you also want the ball set on one face of the opposing V, A little lube with spindle oil/mineral spirits this gives you a smooth repeatable setup. Rather than make the sled id turn a collared bar to replace the tube of the KW, 10" centres makes the rise fall numbers easy with collars being around .5" - 75" in width, his beds 11' long iirc so 12 point to point measurements is more than enough to get the global picture vertical and horizontally. I like the way Keith measured out from the center, I like this method as you can locate the AC directly on the bed which reduces the opportunity for error. Rather than making the sled as hes done, i think a pattern scrapped to fit in both Vs would be more useful, not 100% necessary but makes keeping an eye on the individual surfaces relative to each other much easier. Cheers D
@railfan4395 жыл бұрын
Keith: Like on a sine bar, I would have thought that the bearing surfaces on this would have been minimized, even rounded with hardened dowel rods, for more accuracy. Thanks for the video, and see you at the Bar-Z. Jon
@Broken_Yugo5 жыл бұрын
I guess since it's going to measure a scraped surface it needs large contact point to average the surface.
@otm6465 жыл бұрын
@@Broken_Yugo Plus that average surface is what the carriage is going to ride on. Pins give you a more granular measurement but that does not mean much for real world use.
@csours3 жыл бұрын
Would there be any reason to NOT clean these up on a belt sander before milling? Just a waste of an extra step? I'm thinking of how hard and possibly dirty the outside of a casting can be.
@robertharker5 жыл бұрын
What is the new tool with the lether belt you can see in the background in the grinding part of the video?
@bobvines005 жыл бұрын
Keith, thank you for this video. I'm looking forward to you using your autocollimator on the planer. A couple of questions though: 1.) What is the average "casting skin" thickness on cast iron. 2.) How much does the light first cut(s) dull your inserts? I've always heard that it's best to cut the "skin" completely off at the first pass to maximize the life of the cutter. I.e., cut deep enough to cut under the skin.
@mtraven234 жыл бұрын
I cannot speak to the exact skin depth, but generally it is harder & deeper with smaller castings. While back I machined a set of (30) 5 lbs weight plates, all sorts of different manufacturers and even within 5 lbs, some were way harder than others. I used brazed carbide on the lathe rather than inserts, and chipping was way more a concern than long term tool wear. Getting under that skin is the better way to do it (assuming you have enough material to do so), my lathe is a bit under powered for this so in some cases I just started grinding that skin off with angle grinder...works but messy & slow. If I were keith, I would have dropped that face mill in 50-100k and then maybe a spring pass to clean it up for the grinder. I also might have done a bit more work on the casting shape to include some better work holding features and a bit more meat @ the btm so I could be sure I had enough to remove all the skin.
@bcbloc025 жыл бұрын
Better get to work on that thing on the surface plate to get it all as dead on as possible or you will need to be certain to not move the mirror any on the sled during every use or your measurements will have compounding errors. Easy to go down the rabbit hole when doing tight tolerances over long distances.
@DieselDahl5 жыл бұрын
And I thought the sled season was over now... 🎅🏻
@jacobpoucher5 жыл бұрын
What part of the world are you from? It is very much sled season in the usa
@windyhillfoundry59405 жыл бұрын
Looks great👌
@markpeterson54795 жыл бұрын
Keith, If I heard you right - and inferred right - you said at the end of the video that you would move the sled, check through the eye piece, move the sled, check through the eye piece, move the sled, check through the eye piece, ... What about drilling and tapping each end of the sled for an eye bolt, tie on a cotton clothes line through a pulley and just sit looking through the lens while you pulled the sled back and forth without having to get up for each point?
@lazyh-online48395 жыл бұрын
You need to know where it's at when you're checking, maybe I'm wrong but in my mind it'd be easier to just move it to a known location and check instead of trying to finesse it with a string.
@angelarichards19115 жыл бұрын
What about a nice powder coat? What a finish it would be.
@unclespicey425 жыл бұрын
you should have made 2 of them as a matched pair......not too late to order another. Just a question, how close do the angles match? It looks like you have about 2" flats on the 45s. you can calculate the error they may introduce, likely not significant, but good to know.
@rsemrad24 жыл бұрын
Keith, will you be selling this raw casting?
@EngineersWorkshop5 жыл бұрын
I think a K&E borescope would be better for this. Reads location of the target deviation from optical axis directly, no math. But you do need a fixture to hold the borescope parallel to the V-way, or lay it in the V-way directly. If I remember they have a 2.2500 or 2.5000 diameter.
@dans_Learning_Curve5 жыл бұрын
You learned a lot working at that machine shop! All OJT?
@TheStefanskoglund15 жыл бұрын
Would brass work for something like this ? The casting could in that case easily (somewhat) be done basically by hand.
@otm6465 жыл бұрын
Because it needs to be ground to a finish brass is not an easy material to work with. If you could get the surface good enough with a single point fly cut brass may work. I don't know why he's so fixated on using durabar for this application. I made one just like this out of 4130 PH, worked out great for a machine refurb. Cheap and easy material to work with.
@coconutpie3335 жыл бұрын
give the doggy a meet and greet
@bartdeboer84955 жыл бұрын
Did you get another lathe whitout telling us? (Background surfesgrinder)
@richardlathrop615 жыл бұрын
Looks like a gap bed lathe
@JuanAdam125 жыл бұрын
“We can use some mathematical calculations or whatever...” I wish I had that confidence.
@michaelkenefick5 жыл бұрын
In your opinion, how does Clark's pricing compare to Cattail's?
@tonyvancampen-noaafederal26405 жыл бұрын
Is this the sort of tool, jig, widget, that could be 'perfected' by scraping? or is grinding sufficient to the needed accuracy?
@TheStefanskoglund15 жыл бұрын
If you don't have a grinding machine like that, yes.
@littleworkshopofhorrors23955 жыл бұрын
Not wishing to seem a troll but I am surprised that you have your quill extended so far while using a relatively large face mill.
@littleworkshopofhorrors23955 жыл бұрын
@chris0tube indeed, greater contact area of quill has to be more rigid. And spline life must be improved too if full contact is maintained, depending on machine design.
@SuperAWaC5 жыл бұрын
he's grinding in the final dimensions so it doesn't really matter. it's not going to affect the machine unless that is all it does every day for 30 years.
@littleworkshopofhorrors23955 жыл бұрын
@@SuperAWaCSome would say that it is just not "best practice" and it's the principle that matters as others less experienced might follow thinking it is normal.
@littleworkshopofhorrors23955 жыл бұрын
@chris0tube very true, but i also believe one should try bending "the rules" just to see if there is a better way. For progress to occur the junior should always try to exceed the master, not just follow him.
@jacobpoucher5 жыл бұрын
Not surprised, old rucker isn't the sharpest but he gets it done.
@craigtate59305 жыл бұрын
How much did the 1 off casting cost to manufacture?
@AndrewBuchen5 жыл бұрын
How did you level the piece prior to milling?
@Pamudder5 жыл бұрын
When using the surface grinder, I assume that the wheel gradually wears down. How do you compensate for that?
@ThAtGuY-u9d5 жыл бұрын
John Kailua when the wheel wears it wears on a tapered angle. Front side does most of the cutting so by the time the material is getting to the back side of the wheel it is removing so little that the wear is basically non existent. When taking heavy cuts it could wear all the way across but your constantly dressing the wheel to make it flat again so it doesn’t matter much. You always have to take light cuts to finish a part so there’s almost no wear at that point and you can hold size all the way across the full width of the chuck.
@grzegorzbielski82625 жыл бұрын
Tony has an answer for your question... kzbin.info/www/bejne/pKHck6mejL6eosU
@cyrex6865 жыл бұрын
The wheel is an inch wide. Only the leading edge grinds, when it is grinding at the front of the wheel it is freshly dressed, as you see the sparks from the middle of the wheel it is half done, when the sparks come from the back of the wheel, it is time to redress the wheel. The thicker the wheel, the more you can grind before you need to dress.
@firearmsstudent5 жыл бұрын
Could you put the foundry's contact information in the dooblidoo?
@boubaros5 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/qGGVo6qGnaueZqM
@Coffreek5 жыл бұрын
Next episode, Keith builds an attachment for his surface grinder, so he can use a wider wheel.
@otm6465 жыл бұрын
Nah, the part he was working is sized just fine for the working area of the machine. A wider wheel is more forces on the column, bearings, ect when cutting.
@fengelman5 жыл бұрын
won't you need tow of these? one for the mirror, and another for the "telescope" part?
@hairyfro4 жыл бұрын
Just one - the autocollimator sits in a stationary position during measurements. As long as its stable it doesn't really matter where it is as long as it's lined up with the mirror. You can see in Keith's other video that he has the autocollimator on a hydraulic table cart so he can raise it to the right height, and roll it into a position that gets it lined up with the mirror.
@johngormley21925 жыл бұрын
I just noticed, what are the four pins , 2 each way, in the ends of the way for?I don’t remember them from the tear down videos.
@bcbloc025 жыл бұрын
They used them for measuring points for the way grinding process.
@ron8275 жыл бұрын
Oh no, he forgot to scrape in the sled! :-)
@dmitrydima70725 жыл бұрын
10 из 10
@barkleygentry25045 жыл бұрын
This is why I ain't no machinist. I can't even say or spell otto-columntater! 😁
@sighpocket55 жыл бұрын
Nice!!!
@somebodyelse66735 жыл бұрын
Kinda weird that a casting costs less than bar stock. I'll have to see if there's a short order foundry in my area.
@roncartwright81255 жыл бұрын
Are you going to scrape it in before you use it
@vettepicking5 жыл бұрын
I would
@donaldasayers5 жыл бұрын
I am slightly worried that you have over constrained the sled, in that unless the angle of the V exactly matches the angle in the Veeways then it will be able to wobble side to side, if only slightly. I have been wracking my brains though to think of a combination of spherical and cylindrical surfaces that isn't over constrained and still measures what you want it too. It could also be the case that the wobble I am concerned about will have no effect on the collimator.
@dans_Learning_Curve5 жыл бұрын
Following
@celebtee5 жыл бұрын
There's no cylindrical / spherical solution, all spheres/cylinders will have two contacts in the V.
@donaldasayers5 жыл бұрын
@@celebtee You need 5 points of contact, to leave the one degree of freedom that allows it to slide. You are assuming that a ball has to touch both sides, but it does not have to do so.
@RGSneaker5 жыл бұрын
Maybe you'll make a nice wooden box for it :-)
@willi-fg2dh5 жыл бұрын
you are presenting a restoration of a complicated piece of machinery that requires a high degree of precision (if you intend to do it right) . . . don't apologize for also showing how to make a tool required to do the job . . . that little sled is as much a part of the project as any other required part or piece or tool. as a matter of fact, i'd bet that a lot of your viewers would like to see how to calculate the sled dimensions and the math and measurements involved in the entire leveling process . . . not all geeks use only computers . . . there are tool geeks too!
@dolvaran5 жыл бұрын
Perdy !
@crockteerden40235 жыл бұрын
Hopefully you locked the saddle, not the table
@LerrySanders5 жыл бұрын
First time ive been this early
@MortimerKadaver5 жыл бұрын
Very nice dog! Is dangerous? ;-)
@markpeterson54795 жыл бұрын
Every time I see the dog, I wonder if it ever gets its feet cut on the metal shavings.
@MortimerKadaver5 жыл бұрын
@@markpeterson5479 This doog needs special shoes :P
@Paul-pl4vy5 жыл бұрын
That’s what the bishop said to the actress
@HotelPapa1004 жыл бұрын
If your milling machine has the necessary power, DON'T do that initial scraping pass. Cast skin is very hard on your cutting edges, and having the tips of your inserts subject to that wears your tools down prematurely. Better have the skin cut somewhere along the edge of the insert.
@Th3Su85 жыл бұрын
Even though I know Keith has said it before that cast iron is "self lubricating" and he knows what he is doing when it comes to his machines and how to use them, it still bothers me a little seeing machining done without any lubrication. I am not sure why it does. Maybe it is that I think the cutting tools will be getting hot and possibly damaged. I don't know. I'll just shut up now and watch the video. After all, I'm just an electrician, not a machinist.
@tsw1997565 жыл бұрын
I think your vertical mill spindle speed is too fast for milling cast iron. Whenever I see an excessive dust cloud rising up (there will always be some but proper rpm makes it minimal) and more importantly dust instead of a defined chip then its rotating too fast. I'm a journeyman machinist that has machined thousands of cast iron projects in my lifetime (probably more cast than anything else). I always maximized the chip over dust creation to if nothing else save my lungs.
@tsw1997565 жыл бұрын
@chris0tube that's very true also. I look at it as if I'm doing it and I don't want to breathe all the dust. I guess I've machined too much CI and don't really care to anymore. If I do it comes with a premium price.
@perolovson17155 жыл бұрын
Keith should ask “This Old Tony” if he might use the time machine and descale the part in the planer that is currently in restoration. Abom79 has a shaper perfect for rescaling...
@mmworks835 жыл бұрын
Always machine cast iron dry. I thought it was a rule.
@eliduttman3155 жыл бұрын
Definitely no cutting oil, but the water cooling on the grinder seems OK. Oil mixes with cast iron dust to form an abrasive paste. BTW, "white" cast iron is too hard to machine and must be ground. Keith was working with common "gray" iron. White and gray refer to the appearance of a fracture.
@SuperAWaC5 жыл бұрын
you can usually machine it dry but you don't have to. coolant also helps flush the chips away.
@fatihdurmaz98265 жыл бұрын
3:20 dude that's not how you feed your Z
@kenprovus91955 жыл бұрын
I'M CURIOUS, WHEN THESE MACHINES WERE EARNING THEIR KEEP IN A SHOP, HOW OFTEN WERE CHECKED FOR LEVEL, WEAR ETC>
@lwilton5 жыл бұрын
It depended on your shop. Who owned it, the kind of work they did. In some shops, like the one this planer came from, probably never. It was (hopefully) leveled when originally installed and if it was ever moved around the shop. After that, probably never. In a shop doing certified aircraft work, there are probably rules or laws about certified machine accuracy. I'd expect machines to be inspected and if necessary aligned at least once a year, or any time the machine was seriously crashed or it was suspected that it was out of alignment.
@kenprovus91955 жыл бұрын
@@lwilton THANK YOU!
@hillorystanton62094 жыл бұрын
I do not know why these people can’t say thousandth of a inch.
@bobvines005 жыл бұрын
Keith, thank you for this video. I'm looking forward to you using your autocollimator on the planer. A couple of questions though: 1.) What is the average "casting skin" thickness on cast iron. 2.) How much does the light first cut(s) dull your inserts? I've always heard that it's best to cut the "skin" completely off at the first pass to maximize the life of the cutter. I.e., cut deep enough to cut under the skin.