Mindblowing Structures in the Bible

[@carol5606]

Thanks. The Companion Bible with its many structures is the Bible I have used in my walk. The structures are there. Nice to see a teaching that explores the psalms. Thanks much.

[@sofianjmekeru8525]

Amazing! You must do this think with book of Esther! God bless you!🙏💥👑

[@StewardofSovereignty]

Bro this is nuts. Please please keep doing this.

[@IF1X-]

Definitely would love to see more on your current work on this as you progress.

[@johnnewkirk2986]

Praise Jesus Forever 🙌 🙏 ❤️

[@kylewhitten3961]

Excellent work!

[@amyk6403]

Wonderful!

[@Thandohanmav2]

My favourite structures is that of Psalm 119 and the book of Lamentations.

[@ThePropriate]

This is very interesting. I have been working very deeply on the Books of Genesis and Exodus, studying the Hebrew and doing my own rendition. I have noticed the repetition of words, the repetition of similar events, word play, all kinds of things that almost no one talks about, but which are very interesting to me and speak to the great intelligence of the author of the Bible. I was aware of the chiastic structures. Again, they are very interesting to me. So many things point to the spiritual origin of this great book. I am eager to watch more of your videos. Great work!

[@Agitated_Hamster]

@11:56: A little off topic, but are you also taking into account that Psalms has 151 chapters and not 150? The Masoretic text removed all the vowels, line breaks and edited specific words/verses through the OT. The Lexham Septuagint still has chapter 151 since the original Septuagint was translated from the living word, unchanged by the Rabbis who created the Masoretic text and incorporated the Sethite view (naturalistic view of Genesis 6/Psalms 81(LXX) which can be debated as heresy...because it was always interpreted as Angel's of God until that point.)

[@EulersIdentityCrisis]

This is based on the Hebrew text; so I’m referring to the center of the Hebrew Psalter throughout. The Greek doesn’t factor into this outside of showing Matthew 13 is using the same terminology (in Greek). You have the issue backwards vis-a-vis the Masoretes. They added the vowels and placed structural breaks and cantillation markings. As for Genesis 6 and Psalm 82, the MT doesn’t imply in any way the human view of those passages. Deuteronomy 32 is perhaps another matter.

[@richbaker6212]

Let’s do it! I tried to email, might have failed. I’m a 1990’s Luddite. Anything after 99…. I don’t know

[@EulersIdentityCrisis]

Yeah, I just replied to your email. I rarely check my email.

[@richbaker6212]

@@EulersIdentityCrisis don’t judge me. I would mail you a letter of I could haha

[@ndus3us214]

Wait, you're counting words in a translation of a translation of a translation? I'd put more trust in a count of words in the Hebrew text.

[@EulersIdentityCrisis]

lol it is the count of the words of the hebrew text.

[@martymckay8978]

This is the reason that Michael Heiser said that the Bible Code is not valid.

[@byronumphress3805]

Yeah the mark of the beast and the I. R.S. Acquires ten million dollars worth of weapons, ammunition and combat gear? And Trump l Shalom

[@PainlessTrader-h1u]

Jesus came in the year 4000... The fourth day... Uh so he should be xoming back soon.. its almost the sixth day

[@Stupidityindex]

Faith attracts folks with low esteem by pretending it is OK, pretending a relationship with a deity & magical powers like prayer.

[@EulersIdentityCrisis]

You're a Doctor Who fan.

[@colton7373]

By what standard can you claim that faith is not OK? Making a truth claim that there isn't transcendent truth is a self defeating argument.

[@alexanderthegoat]

Mid Ragebait.

[@EulersIdentityCrisis]

@@alexanderthegoat it's funny because someone famously argued (it may have been Freud) that religious people have daddy issues so they project their need for a good father figure onto the cosmos. But in reality, research has shown religious people tend to have better relationships with their fathers. It's the atheists that are stuck in their mad at daddy phase.

[@Bradcz0077]

It’s not faith. It’s math. And it’s also provable if you simply do the work which you can get a computer to do. What is really interesting is seeing people like you who have zero room to even speak against irrefutable proof and undeniable data that the universe is not only created but the non human that wrote it can see your stupid ass. And I hope you don’t mind being laughed at. It’s fine though. That’s explained clearly in the Bible as well…you’re stupid.