Seriously, these are life savers concise, digestible, Awesome job!!! Thank you so much for this!!! Only note is I wish there were subtitles when I click the CC
@qamarwali4 ай бұрын
Many thanks for the nice words. Sure, I will improve the contents and incorporate your other suggestions. ❤️
@Sparxe Жыл бұрын
Clearest explanation I've seen. Thank you so much!
@qamarwali Жыл бұрын
I am happy it helps . Welcome and wish you all the best 👍
@nelsonprabu7 ай бұрын
I am just now watching your video, How you have given such a beautiful explanation. If I had seen this video during my research I could have done my research much better.
@qamarwali7 ай бұрын
I am happy you like it. Thanks for your comment ❤️
@kavitasinghchauhan8555 Жыл бұрын
Sir Your depth of knowledge and grip on fundamentals help us a lot. Thank you, sir.
@qamarwali Жыл бұрын
I am happy you like it. Thanks so much 🙏 💓
@ritugarg74383 жыл бұрын
You r a great Professor .....Sir aaj tak samaz nahi aaya tha...lekin ab aa gaya
@qamarwali3 жыл бұрын
I am happy it helps.
@mbongenisiwela5710 Жыл бұрын
This explanation just simplified a lot if problems, thanks a lot!!
@qamarwali Жыл бұрын
I am happy it helps
@amishaverma6692 Жыл бұрын
Thanks alot sir, yr explanation is really helpful. I wish we had teachers like you at our institutions.
@qamarwali Жыл бұрын
Many thanks for your nice comment. I am happy it helps
@BetonDoktoru3 жыл бұрын
Dear Professor, thank you very much for your summarized valuable contribution.
@qamarwali3 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@devaraphysics14469 ай бұрын
Sir could u plz explain why hump comes at lower angles in case of amorphous materials in detail rather than disordered orientation
@qamarwali9 ай бұрын
The key reason is the scattering angle. When the path difference is = 0, no destructive interference and high peaks When the path difference is greater than 0, then there is a chance of destructive interference, and the peaks decrease... Now, the higher the angle, the greater the path difference, the more destructive interference as a result, no peaks or smaller pealks..
@zulfiqarshigri3708 Жыл бұрын
Outstanding sir thanks for your support by making such a gorgeous videos 📸
@qamarwali Жыл бұрын
I am happy you like it. You are always welcome
@riyasv7971 Жыл бұрын
This is excellent, the analogy make it easy understanding.anyway, thank you so much
@qamarwali Жыл бұрын
Yeah, example and analogy make things simple. I am happy it helps and thank you for your nice comment
@mohammadkhalil32652 жыл бұрын
That is simplest way … finally I’m understand … thanks 🙏
@qamarwali2 жыл бұрын
Welcome
@LearnwithAasma4 жыл бұрын
the best videos so farrrr love ypur workkk.. respectttt to you sirr
@qamarwali4 жыл бұрын
Many thanks for your comment
@devaraphysics14469 ай бұрын
Your explanation is quite good Sir but my doubt is that why a hump like structure comes only at the smaller angles why not at bigger angles. As the material is amorphous it should be homogeneous throughout. Is there any explanation or particular reason for that hump at smaller angles but not at the bigger angles.
@qamarwali9 ай бұрын
This is a good question. If you look into the crystalline XRD, there also the higher intense peaks occur at lower angles. This may be due to the fact that when the scattering angle is increasing ,thr xrays absorb by the sample and less intense peaks are observed. The same is for the amorphous hump...
@bmn.phd.91 Жыл бұрын
Thanks. one question, maybe this broadening of the peak is related to microstrain or crystallite size but still we have a crystalline material. Is it a good measurement then?
@qamarwali Жыл бұрын
Yes, it is an approximate measurement. The crystallite size calculation from XRD is not that reliable. For best results, we need to use FESEM, or TEM, as you can see the grain size or crystallite size or even particle size..
@beautifullyearth5764 ай бұрын
Very clear. Thanks so much
@qamarwali4 ай бұрын
Welcome
@organiccookingmore90714 жыл бұрын
Very good explanation...hats off for u
@qamarwali4 жыл бұрын
I am happy it helps.
@organiccookingmore90714 жыл бұрын
@@qamarwali R u from quetta, peshawar or Afghanistan?
@qamarwali4 жыл бұрын
@@organiccookingmore9071 I am from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa near to Peshawar
@shushantrajput33798 ай бұрын
❤ amazing explanation....
@qamarwali8 ай бұрын
Thanks 😊. I am happy you like it
@mehranalam1274 Жыл бұрын
if there is partial crystalline xrd, how can we distinguish or mark the amorphous and crystalline region. the above example is very simple. please upload some videos about complex xrd. thanks
@qamarwali Жыл бұрын
I don't think if a material has both regions, i.e., *Crystalline* & *Amorphous* regions at the same time. If it is there, it would be much better to use TEM, SAED analysis to differentiate. The *pXRD for amorphous* shows broad peaks as the diffraction cancell each others and no peak intensity in a specific direction. It is just like when you *shine light on a broken mirror*. You won't get any reflected light in a specific direction. Rather, the light is scattered in all directions with very low intensity, or it is called diffuse intensity. *pXRD for crystalline materials* gives sharp and narrow peaks due to the diffraction of x-rays in specific direction as crystalline materials have order in atomic position. It is just like a perfect mirror. When you shine light, the light will reflect in a specific direction with high intensity.
@mehranalam1274 Жыл бұрын
@@qamarwali nice thanks sir
@mehranalam1274 Жыл бұрын
@@qamarwali some material have both region, from appearance we can observe there is both region.
@koukoukoukita700810 ай бұрын
@@qamarwali sur please would you please give me your email IAM stuck in interpretation, if you can help me sir of course. Thank you so much for the precious information that you are sharing with us
@qamarwali10 ай бұрын
@koukoukoukita7008 you are welcome. I see my email very rarely. I can definitely answer your question here to the best of my capabilities. If I know your question, I will definitely explain and respond. Please drop your query
@MrInzombia2 жыл бұрын
thank you so much. Great lecturer
@qamarwali2 жыл бұрын
I am very happy it helps
@kevalbharati8604 жыл бұрын
Amezing explanation,thank you sir.
@qamarwali4 жыл бұрын
I am happy it helps. Thank you for your appreciation
@muhammadumarkhan95863 жыл бұрын
Fantastic explanation Sir Keep it up Thank you very much
@qamarwali3 жыл бұрын
You are welcome
@S.H.Less552 жыл бұрын
How can i find FWHM without origin software for calculations of crystalline nature.
@qamarwali2 жыл бұрын
I think you have to calculate those parameters using any software. PowerPoint or paint can helps
@anasahmad18627 күн бұрын
sir why all amorphous show broad peak in 20-40 degree only ???
@qamarwali7 күн бұрын
Usually amorphous materials shows BROAD XRD peaks. This is due to the reasons that there is no long range order of the atoms in the amorphous materials. The x-rays scatter from the atoms in different directions and we get diffused spectra (less intense and broad peaks) The Crystalline sample give Sharp XRD Peaks. This is due to the fact that atoms arranged in the crystal acts like a plane (mirror). I always give this example to clarify the concepts. *Crystalline materials:* We we shine visible light on the mirror, the reflection of the light is intense (sharp). *Amorphous materials:* When you break the mirror into pieces and the pieces are still in the frame and then shine light, the reflections is NOT sharp but instead diffuse Why the peaks are getting less intense at higher 2theta and with the lower angle, the peaks getting smaller. I strongly recommend watching this full playlist on XRD analysis kzbin.info/aero/PLWgqLpcPbMgckHs0e677v8_GUh9-itYoS
@anasahmad18626 күн бұрын
@ thank you sir 😍
@michaelviti50913 жыл бұрын
This was excellent, thank you so much!!!
@qamarwali3 жыл бұрын
Welcome
@udaysinghpatil77593 жыл бұрын
my test sample consist of many compounds. How can I find the type of compound present in the test samples using XRD graph? i.e how can i correlate XRD graph with composition of sample.
@qamarwali3 жыл бұрын
XRD does not shows you composition of element or compound. It only shows crystalline nature of a material. For finding compounds or elements in your sample, you need EDS/ EDX analysis. I have made video on it too.
@Pankajkumar-pd1cy3 жыл бұрын
thank u sir for informative video
@qamarwali3 жыл бұрын
Welcome
@mehranalam12743 жыл бұрын
how can we differentiate between amorphous and noise contain in the xrd?
@qamarwali3 жыл бұрын
Amorphous and noise are two different things. Amorphous peak will be broad one . Noise will looks like sawtooth and can not differentiate it's peaks.
@mehranalam12743 жыл бұрын
@@qamarwali thanks sir ur answer is appreciated
@aditibandhral10 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot Sir
@sumitkumar-el3kc4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, so finding miller indices in case of amorphous is not worth it? Right?
@qamarwali4 жыл бұрын
You are right, I reckon. Becuse in amorphous we have no peaks.
@sumitkumar-el3kc4 жыл бұрын
@@qamarwali also sir, crystallite size interpretation is difficult too in case of amorphous?
@qamarwali4 жыл бұрын
I agree with you. Basically peaks comes from diffraction of of so many planes in a particular direction. Just like analogy with a big mirror (crystalline) and when you break that mirror into so many pieces than it become amorphous
@qamarwali4 жыл бұрын
I agree with you. Basically peaks comes from diffraction of of so many planes in a particular direction. Just like analogy with a big mirror (crystalline) and when you break that mirror into so many pieces than it become amorphous
@qamarwali4 жыл бұрын
I agree with you. Basically peaks comes from diffraction of of so many planes in a particular direction. Just like analogy with a big mirror (crystalline), when we shine light, we get reflection at one point and when you break that mirror into so many pieces then we get diffuse reflection and we call it amorphous
@karlasalazarsanchez5784 жыл бұрын
Hi, I have some peaks data and idk what "Int. I(cps deg)" and "Int. W(deg)" mean, Can you help me with those meanings? thanks
@qamarwali4 ай бұрын
Sorry I could not see the message. Actually on the x-axis, there is 2 theta in degree unit and on y-axis, there is intensity in unit of cps means count per second or a.u means arbitrary unit.
@PharezTube3 жыл бұрын
amazing lectire. thank you sir!!!!
@qamarwali3 жыл бұрын
I am glad it helps
@newkhan71524 жыл бұрын
Great sir
@vidyasagarsingarapu2135 Жыл бұрын
Sir is there any standard pdf card for amorphous zinc phosphate glass
@qamarwali Жыл бұрын
Of course, there are the data available. Just look for an ICDD or JCPDS card or simply do compressive literature review, and I do hope the researcher must have reported.
@vidyasagarsingarapu2135 Жыл бұрын
If you don't mind, can u help me to find out the jcpds card.
@qamarwali Жыл бұрын
@vidyasagarsingarapu2135 you just try first. It is good for you as you learn different things while searching . Ask on *researchgate* if you have a profile there, and many researchers will respond. Read at least 20 research papers related to this zinc phosphate glass and some decent *review papers*. You are not supposed to read the full papers but only the specific portion of your interest. I am sure you will find it. Wish you all the best !
@jamilaa95064 жыл бұрын
that's so useful thank you man
@qamarwali4 жыл бұрын
You are welcome
@pompapathipompapathi148 ай бұрын
Super sir
@rukhsarlatif58403 жыл бұрын
best keep it up
@qamarwali3 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@mithilagunarathne75433 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir 🙏🏻
@qamarwali3 жыл бұрын
Welcome
@deepikagarg34564 жыл бұрын
Amazing👍
@Bibilophile-t6u2 жыл бұрын
Tq so much sir
@qamarwali2 жыл бұрын
Welcome
@manniribrahimtarno15382 жыл бұрын
Well appreciated
@qamarwali2 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@Jaago124 жыл бұрын
nice
@BC-yr6eg3 жыл бұрын
👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿
@jahanzaibali60372 жыл бұрын
Bhai tu urdu me dedia kr presentation. Is munh per English achi nh lgti.....
@qamarwali2 жыл бұрын
Okay thanks so much for suggestions. I will start it
@mrhasans6 ай бұрын
If he spoke other languages except English I wouldn't be here.
@akshitkumar2282 жыл бұрын
you please use your original voice . not very much good . do not pretend like britishers.