MOST INNOVATIVE AIRCRAFT YOU DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT

Today we have put together a selection of air vehicles for you that could in the near future become the present. Among the novelties are prototypes that not only fly but are already being prepared for mass production. Are you ready? Let's get started.
Subscribe to our channel! bit.ly/3XjayMl
#inventions #tehnology #nextlevel #gadgets
1. 00:24-1:26
www.iflyasx.com/
2. 1:27-2:34
shield.ai/v-bat/
3. 2:35-3:42
/ @bellwetherindustries
4. 3:43-4:49
/ @leonardocompany
5. 4:50-5:54
www.youtube.com/@regentcraft3...
6. 5:55-6:59
/ @cyclotechgmbh
7. 7:00-7:56
/ @insituinc
8. 7:57-9:11
/ @airspeeder
If you are the author of the materials or the copyright owner of it, but your authorship was not indicated or you object to its use, please contact me: [e-mail]
Don’t miss next videos: Press the little bell ((🔔)) to get notifications
Production Music courtesy of Epidemic Sound www.epidemicsound.com/
352

[@namenotavailable11]

So much of this is B.S. "I only have a scale model, but my flying car will be inservice in 5 years". lol

[@seanbigay1042]

Whoever designed Sigma 6 must also be a huge Thunderbirds fan!

[@salesiosilva8133]

Com certeza.

[@jholt03]

I've been seeing videos like this for the last ten years at least, and they're always just a year or two away from mass production.

[@BegudMaximan-zp2tc]

Very true. And do we see hundreds of these things in everyday use? Nope, because no one will buy em, because no one will back em, simple as that.

[@onemaxlight]

YEs exactly! all made to steal money from kickstarted, noone real, noone could be safe fro the pilot, noone could take off with the weight of battery and pilot without a huge limit in range.. we are incredible far even from fun prototypes

[@seanbigay1042]

Whoever designed V-BAT must be a huge Thunderbirds fan!

[@stavm1909]

Some amazing innovations there.

[@styrofoamx229]

This was amazing, glad I stumbled on this video

[@davidkotze4140]

Reminds me of : Those Magnificent Men and their Flying Machines 😊😊

[@richardschneider294]

Awesome thanks 😊.

[@clarencehopkins7832]

Excellent stuff bro

[@mhughes1160]

The biggest problem I see with most of these is the glide ratio of 0 In the event of engine failure 😨

[@subramaniamchandrasekar1397]

Yes. It needs a minimum speed and wing span to glide. For the new 'commercial passenger' electric planes, the batteries are also a pain. Saw a news that the batteries must be replaced after about 14 trips. Very expensive.

[@johnrobertson7583]

Ha! my thought exactly...

[@justsayno1415]

Ballistic parachutes can negate some of this issue as these vehicles are mostly super light weight.

[@mhughes1160]

@@justsayno1415 just like they helped Yogi Bear 🐻 ? LoL 😂

[@ChristLink-Channel]

Human carrying rones with 4 motors, one at each "corner", horrify me... Imagine what would happen if one of those motors fails.

[@Bianchi77]

Cool video shot, keep it up, thank you for sharing :)

[@The_Privateer]

Does no one think about what it would actually be like to be in the skies with thousands of other people in their flying cars? - The same people that cut you off, swerve toward you, fail to signal, and are downright a threat to themselves and everyone else around them? A future with 'flying cars' will end the human race.

[@javiervasquez29]

Make them taxi only

[@johnkemas7344]

You are absolutely correct. As a pilot it doesn't take much to realize that our air traffic control system would be totally over whelmed and need massively expanded. Most average people would never be able to pass the necessary training to be a competent pilot even with near total automation. Hell most of us can't afford new cars let alone high priced aircraft. Never happen in most of our lifetimes I don't think. Putting stupid people behind the wheel of aircraft is a very frightening thought. Most people can't drive cards with any great deal of safety let alone a plane!!

[@justsayno1415]

Realistically these vehicles would have to be autonomous because you're right, most people are too stupid/selfish/aggressive to drive a car safely, let alone an aircraft.

[@jholt03]

Don't worry. I've been seeing videos like this for the last ten years at least, and they're always just a year or two away from mass production.

[@fredtedstedman]

they said everyone would have a helicopter - most people can only just manage to drive a car .....and be safe .

[@danielburgess7785]

"innovative glider" Son, that thing glides like boulders eat pizza.

[@aimezammit7208]

Bonjour de la Provence en France magnifique innovation

[@tomsherwood4650]

All these flights in ideal calm weather. You can drive in the wind and rain and stormy days.

[@peymanenanloo6570]

بسیار عالی از توضیحات ارزنده شما و تهیه این ویدئو......موفق باشید 🙏🙏👍👍👏👏

[@iugey]

Couple of errors, the AgustaWestland AW609 first flew in 2003, not recently. The piloted racing drone is not the first "Piloted racing aircraft," air races have been held as early as 1920...Maybe they meant it is the first piloted racing drone? The script for this video seems like it was written by ChatGPT 😂

[@ChristLink-Channel]

Seems to completely ignore the many decades of Reno Air Races, and similar events...

[@mantis1412]

Spike’s Swordfish II, nice!

[@joefergerson5243]

So many things to breakdown or just fail in midair 😮

[@paulbegley1464]

With the first one it would need at least two batteries with an indicator light to warn you that the 1st battery is drained. Plus you would want the spare battery/Batteries to be in arms reach with the main battery port also being in hand reach so you don't have to leave the cockpit control's.

[@crazestyle83]

The second drone v-bat would be susceptible to crashes in high wind landings and take offs

[@johnslugger]

*Sure I what to strap myself into a flying car!. Next I'll visit the Titanic in a Sub.*

[@robertbolino9052]

I can't wait to see what will the New Blade on the horizon will improve this Aircraft!

[@Aristothink]

I liked the airplane that uses ground effect (the downwash gets stuck between the wings and the ground) to use more lift. I also liked the cycleblade from CycloTech !! Flying objects are being totally reinvented !! Wow !! Imagine in 20 years from now....👍

[@wedgie502]

First air race vehicle? I guess they don't know about the Redbull air races or the air races held at Reno, Nevada?

[@Mullewarp]

And there where already air races in the 1920's.

[@ChristLink-Channel]

Right. And not the only example of shoddy research and questionable clams in this video. It's just one tiny hair short of typical ignorant YT clickbait.

[@Kingkongheavenlydivine]

Seen the 1st one everyday for a good while now ... Low orbit hover surveillance drone

[@josephcope7637]

While considering the merits of aircraft having a detachable passenger compartment I can't shake off thoughts of what would happen if a malfunction caused separation of the compartment in flight.

[@stevennagley3407]

So what if there’s a parachute attached to the capsule? The plan is to eject the whole capsule with a parachute saving all lives?

[@EKUL34]

@@stevennagley3407 parachute only works if you are high enough, at a low enough height a parachute wouldn't have time to open

[@kropper1802]

​@@EKUL34a parachute only works with air, on the moon it wouldn't have any air to open.

[@EKUL34]

@@kropper1802 Who said anything about the moon?

[@christophschreiber172]

How about a combination of parachutes, solid fuel rockets triggered related to speed and ground proximity and tons of airbags inside and outside the capsule... needs some development.

[@sriharshacv7760]

3:46 is exactly what I pictured a flying car to look like.

[@TexanWolverine]

you must have a different timestamp.. 3:46 is clearly an airplane.

[@ericstyles3724]

The Osprey civilian widowmaker shud do well. Until its first of many accidents..

[@prltqdf9]

You should have included the Lilium Jet by Lilium Aviation.

[@andrewfischer556]

One of these is actually a real serious aircraft from a real experienced aircraft manufacturer Augusta Westland is developing AW609 as a civilian commercial version of the US army Bell V 22

[@Freq412]

That thing has been a flying prototype for 15 years with Bell Helicopter Textron being the original designer. However, I think we're done with tilting turboprop engines. Just look at the Bell V280 Valor as an example. Tilt the prop-rotor and keep the engine(s) horizontal (no hot exhaust burning holes in the ground, safer for passengers).

[@joaquimrocha9494]

Dude, make your research right... the AW609 started as a Bell project (XV-15), that still runs, and has been flying since 2003. Several improvements on the design lead to 3 more prototypes been made in 2016 for a new certification process, that after 5 long years, its almost done.

[@andrekruger135]

"You didn't know about"...? How do you know what I know about? Can you read my memory chips?

[@donchonealyotheoneal5456]

It's like listening to my children when they were three or four trying to sound sophisticated and obviously there's no post-production editing so we get to hear mono Coke and there were several other misspoken words or misuse of a word or phrase there's just no integrity any longer in most aspects of life you can't trust anyone much less understand them

[@ChristLink-Channel]

The narrator is probably way too politically correct to pronounce "mono coque" correctly... either that, or way to ignorant to even know how to pronounce it!

[@senortroncoso1898]

Yo tengo 7 de cada uno de estos modelos, 10 del segundo.

[@BegudMaximan-zp2tc]

Hover rotorcraft are ok until it comes to wind gusts and the like, then they show less prowess, due their design flaws. Just make sure there's a functioning ballistic parachute built in for good measure!

[@kolar]

Airborne Formula One. POD RACING! Okay I like sports now.

[@user-fb8jb5yi6g]

I love the Volar, but how do passengers get in and out of it?

[@daltonx6177]

The Air Speeder is nothing new: it's been done before by Anakin Skywalker in Star Wars... 😁

[@Nodem1948]

Al we need, is a cold fusion energy cell?

[@FarmerFpv]

The problem with quadcopters is they don't translate efficiently from small scale to large passenger scale. The companies that are trying to build quadcopters for passengers have never exceeded more than 50 to 60 mph. The amount of hull tilt to get up to speeds of let's say a helicopter about 100knots would be almost vertical. They have been chasing the hopeless dream for a decade. Most of the people building them came from racing drones and they aren't even engineers. They are hobbyists. Fixed wing is going to be the future for a long time. Which is why I love the Boom XB1 Supersonic passenger plane program. It has the best chance of succeeding and flying much faster than the Concorde.

[@gpaull2]

How can a manufacturer know what range future developed batteries are going to give? Makes me question all of their claims.

[@mrbaab5932]

They are probably using the predicted stats of a battery that is in development now and may fail.

[@ChristLink-Channel]

I think the process is called "wishful thinking"....

[@nickbutter9270]

Air Speeder ( Spit Fire ) Mach 4... SpitFire Fighter Plane look-a-like. Or even the P40 Mustang likeness

[@rapierfool1]

About the time these are perfected and people buy a bunch of them the FAA in the US will ban them.

[@Thejohnnyoshow]

You do realize Formula One Air Racing has been a thing since like 1945 or so right?

[@drewbear82]

You missed one of the most innovative and practical designs being developed. The PteroDynamics XP-4

[@johnrobertson7583]

Yeahthats a good design...I saw the 3 and was hoping they would tweak it...they did definitely with success!

[@asifpaLash]

lol you missed lilium

[@powerfarmer]

Why sooo complicated? The helicopter is already invented - and works without a gyroscope ...

[@TheWITTERAT]

I think all inventions after the 90s were no longer made public, with the exception of your smartphone.

[@MadazzaMusik]

wpieout comes to mind

[@ernsailor9041]

Monocoke 8:46, I wonder what that is, I'm guessing the narrator or writer doesn't know they already have F1 equivalent aircraft and races.

[@sleepyheadsleeps]

All doomed to failure

[@Vention3]

I'm looking for Canadian developers to help me make my concept that would put these all in there place pretty quick.. ;^)

[@michaeljmasseri973]

Course, make a weapon out of it

[@kmoecub]

Ummm... piloted racing aircraft have been around almost as long as aircraft have. There are races all over the world that have been held regularly for decades.

[@sbkenn1]

I wish people would put a flag on the image to indicate simulations.

[@ab-du6sw]

Oh great! We don't have enough immature drivers on the highway, we're now going to let them interfere with the commercial traffic lanes....

[@MT.2012]

Use metric or provide metric equivalents

[@JohnHill-qo3hb]

Flight endurance of an hour or two, great but notice absolutely no information about how long it takes to recharge the battery.

[@ChannelScottify]

The Volar has a capacity of 1300lbs or 1x American.

[@karyjas1]

6:14 engines...? I dont think thats an engine...

[@AddyAdderson]

We're in a period of so much flight innovation these days. It's in stark contrast to the hide-bound state of aviation as we've known it for decades.

[@daltonx6177]

What innovation ? Have you seen any of those actually used commercially ? Voilà...

[@grahamo22]

Theres a reason for that - innovative solutions tend to crash a lot, and the aviation industry is amazingly safe as a result of not letting cranks loose on the market.

[@LowenKM]

Yep, and that Volar concept in particular, with its futuristic batwing design and hidden ducted fans makes even the more 'innovative' ones look kinda 'retro'!

[@bokchow2594]

HYDROGEN HYDROGEN HYDROGEN......wake up!

[@user-kz6ti6rs2w]

весь мир придумывает и реализует новые идеи и это счастье для человека, радость творчества. МЫ ПРИДУМАЛИ ВОЙНУ И УБИЙСТВА-КТО МЫ.

[@phillipmcmurran8991]

Why do they call it a glider

[@ChristLink-Channel]

Because they don't know any better, probably!

[@theenchiladakid1866]

Another "number of things the cc just found out about and thinks no one else knows it"

[@Believer21777]

until energy storying device better then heavy battery is devolved these will be dreams or short distance travel from roof top to roof top

[@k.chriscaldwell4141]

If it does not have a survivable airfoil produced glide ratio or auto-rotation, it's not a viable aircraft. It's a death trap.

[@metalwolf112002]

8:20 "lets take the excitement of F1 crashes and put them 20 feet in the air to make collisions even more exciting!

[@ChristLink-Channel]

Yup! Just like Reno air races! I heard they were cancelled, though. Not sure if it's true...

[@ricerob]

The A609 is not the 1st small private tilt rotocraft. I with my own eyes ionize outside of Atlanta someone what it was. I don't know but I saw a tilt rotor that looked like a private jet in 1996. It's a somebody screwed up on this video

[@ronaldwhite1730]

Thank - you . ( 2023 / July / 15 )

[@bradtownsend1457]

Why not a word on the switch blade aircraft?

[@papwithanhatchet902]

As Neil deGrasse Tyson says: “We already have flying cars... they’re called helicopters.” And goes on to say the reason we don’t all use helicopters is because they’re noisy as hell and, in that regard, impractical. Can you imagine thousands of air displacing, horrendously loud vehicles buzzing around the city all day long? We won’t have common air vehicles until gravity is overcome, likely with the development of superconductors.

[@justsayno1415]

Most of these are far quieter than a heli.

[@Duckofstalker]

Rotor tech lul

[@avalanche9026]

No matter how you twist it turn it. Will need a propulsion either prop or jet. No changes for the last 120 years. Just different look designs ?? Same product different rep ??

[@84com83]

Did You show any energy-economic solutions? I lacked energy to wait until the ................

[@vulcan4d]

Keep these insanely loud drones out of cities.

[@Bombarded1n]

Crop circles myth busted 😂 or whatever

[@Ichwillkeinenaliascheisyoutube]

I think you forgot at leasr one innovative aircraft , and youn can BUY it these days , the ""Jetsn One"" !

[@thinds5271]

These are all innovative. But most are old technology. All these designs are antiquated and repetitive. Real innovations in flight do not include propellers of any type, nor do they use traditional lift by wings.

[@dekutree64]

You mean reactionless propulsion using Ken Shoulders EVO/coherent matter physics? I agree, flying by spinning blades has gotten old. I would like to see regular aircraft with novel propulsion methods like ion wind or flapping wings, but in the end it will all be obsolete in the face of EVO tech.

[@thinds5271]

@@dekutree64 yes. I want to see a mechanical reactionless thruster. There are designs out there, but they don't produce much. .. and yes a flapping "ornothopter" I think is what it's called would be cool too. I've seen people fly those rc birds.

[@vitamin_IM]

Обидно , что где то создаются такие концепты. А у нас в России ничего никому не надо.

[@psedulous]

why do you call it a "glider?" It is a powered aircraft. It would not "glide" if not powered.

[@thrilleex]

Sure it will, for a few meters before crashing in a spectacular fashion.

[@sheerluckholmes5468]

Ever heard of "The glide angle of a brick?"

[@jakerazmataz852]

Electric planes are not near ready yet. 150 mi. range that's only 75 each way. Driving would be MUCH more economic. After installing batteries that aren't invented yet, the range will increase.... Wouldn't a catapult be easier and cheaper that a whole other devise to get it in the air.

[@ledsalesoz]

Doesn't work like that. EV charging is so fast now that for aircraft, by the time you have unloaded at your destination and reloaded, which takes 20 mins or whatever, you are pretty much approaching a full charge again. Even with cars, many charge so fast now that you barely get time for a pee break and to get a cuppa before you hit 80% and need to move the car. All electric aircraft I've seen have prioritised charging speed...

[@jakerazmataz852]

@@ledsalesoz It's not the charging speed, it's the range.

[@daltonx6177]

So, according to your obtuse thinking, the Wright Brothers first flight of only 12 seconds was a failure ? They should have waited for a 200 hp motor instead of the 12 hp they built themselves (out of aluminium, no less !!!) ? Riiiight... Considering that a few months later, they flew over a distance of over 4000 feet and with the Flyer III in 1905, they flew it for over 38 minutes and 38 km, not bad, I'd say ! The rest is history! Thank God for bold and dedicated inventors... 👍

[@Galaxyrex1215-rc4tw]

Sigma-6😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@kylenolan3138]

A video loses credibility when the writer doesn't know what an engine is.

[@ChristLink-Channel]

Or what a glider is... or that airplane races have been around for nearly a century already...

[@scottryals3191]

When do they start falling on people's homes? Would you loan it to your teenage son? You think drunk driving is bad now, wait till you see it in 3 dimensions. Where are the regulations, and how will they be enforced? Just how loud are these things? Insurance? Power lines. It's gonna take a while for these things to become safe, reliable and not a nuisance. Seriously, do you want your neighbor taking off from his backyard at 5 in the morning, or coming home at 2 AM, drunk?

[@jenniferkellogg5204]

First piloted racing aircraft?? I think the air racers of the 1920s and 30s would have something to say about that! Jimmy Doolittle, Howard Hughes, just to name two of them. Check your facts please. Otherwise, I like your videos.

[@amitaimedan]

Volar... it's not science fiction... YES It is!

[@matraz10]

...and the flying car should be on sale within the next five years. Yeah, no. 5 years, 10 years, and 20 years are all impossible for a flying car to become a thing. 50 years is even a stretch. Laws have to be changed and new ones made. Teaching people, license types created. FAA creating a whole new division to deal with it. But the biggest problem with nobody seemingly offering up any ideas at all is traffic control. Where would the flying paths be, sky lanes, I suppose? Can't just have people flying wherever they want, flight paths already exist. But those are commercial lanes. So what big difference would flying cars make? The Jetsons showed it perfectly: rush hour road jams in the sky, just like we have now.

[@williamstarkey9032]

The first airborne racing aircraft ? I don't think so . There have been racing aircraft as far back as the 1920s , they were called AIRPLANES . . the Air Speeder Mark IV is nothing new 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@JoeGator23]

The "emission Free" first aircraft is fueled by a coal-fired power plant... false advertising in a sense. Hardly innovative compared to other craft soon to be on the market, too.

[@jamesneely766]

check out the definition of "glider"

[@mikehallett277]

0:34 and 0:47 "Glider"..... Really? 🙄

[@augh116]

sigma 6💀💀💀

[@Jkauppa]

any metal (iron) sheet spool + water + CuSO4 + dilute H2SO4 + graphite air electrode = metal at full energy storage per weight + electric 'combustion' (fuel cell) engine

[@jamesfulerten8494]

Can you imagine all that junk flying around all over the place over your head !!!? And your house !!!? Seems that it ain't goin' to be realistic to contemplate, really.

[@youtubehandol]

Thumbs down for not even at least putting captions for Metric, which are all but 2 countries in the WORLD. Be better.

[@starwolf3020]

VOLAR ,,,, but can u dogfight with it ????

[@heribertohernandez2910]

😼

[@jasoncrandall]

The technology to fly is old and easy. A place to land all these flying contraptions is the hard part. If you still need to use an airport to land they are all pointless.