"Buick hopes it will attract younger buyers." Been chasing that demographic forever.
@anibalbabilonia18672 жыл бұрын
Unsuccessfully May I add!
@matte84412 жыл бұрын
I’m in my late 20s and I actually like the latest Buick Regal TourX. I’m too cheap to buy one tho.
@TJ_9182 жыл бұрын
@@matte8441 Too bad they discontinued them though 🙁
@ianyeh752 жыл бұрын
@@anibalbabilonia1867 not exactly. Buick gave up on that goal in the US, but in China, it became the status symbol for most young professionals and families.
@Forge172 жыл бұрын
The self deprecating ads certainly haven’t helped. Buick is a brand with rich history though.
@95blahblahhaha2 жыл бұрын
John Davis truly is a national treasure!!! I watched him as a kid and 26 years later he's still here and was doing it 10 years before I was born. He can dawgg a car in the POLITEST way possible. You better have ALL his clusterment gauges or you're in trouble 😂😂
@bilalahmed21232 жыл бұрын
He is crazy about his full instrument gauges, included but not limited to voltage, oil pressure, coolant gauge, and so on ! I’d be happy, if cars instrument clusters looked like they ones aircrafts with readouts for everything !
@HamsterWheelGaming2 жыл бұрын
His favorite birthday gift is an oil pressure gauge
@bilalahmed21232 жыл бұрын
@@HamsterWheelGaming Haha 😆
@brettbanta2100 Жыл бұрын
@@HamsterWheelGaming and volt meters
@mitch4527 Жыл бұрын
I started watching him in 1985 when I was 20. I’m now pushing 60 and he’s still on the job. The man deserves a lifetime achievement award.
@TheRealHungryJoe2 жыл бұрын
“We like how the rear windows go all the way done” It’s crazy to think, that was a huge step for manufacturers
@mattg50222 жыл бұрын
Ah . . . but it was a huge step for GM though - Motorweek was always trying to be extra-fair to domestics - which I understand and I like them for that . . .
@samd14052 жыл бұрын
It wasn't. They went all the way down for decades and then in the early 80s they decided people in the back seat didn't need air for some reason.
@Kacpa22 жыл бұрын
Not really a step, it comes from sacrifice of having whole window roll down, its physicly impossible for it to go fully down tho since rear doors narrow down because of rear wheel wheels.
@pdennis932 жыл бұрын
And then there were the A/G body 4 doors from.78-87. Roll down rear windows not available.
@PliskinHK2 жыл бұрын
lots of cars still don't go all the way down
@williamegler87712 жыл бұрын
I owned one for five years and over 200k miles. I had a 175 round trip commute at the time and needed a comfortable vehicle. I bought it the end of the model year close out sale for a substantial discount. I always thought it was kind of ugly but it was cheap and I have better looking cars in the garage and the Buicks main duty was to save wear and tear on them. Drove it for 5 years and even drove across country several times including a 10,000 mile round trip from Wisconsin to Alaska. Never failed to start or left anyone stranded and issues were minimal and far between. I only remember two issues that stood out and that was leaking valve cover gaskets and shift solenoids. When I sold it I sold it to our housekeeper's brother and he drove it for a number of years afterwards.
@WinterInTheForest2 жыл бұрын
I think it's a nice looking car, the interior seems comfy too. I was a little young at the time but don't remember these being around. Seems if Buick dropped a more capable engine in it like the 3800 it would be perfect. We had an Olds Achieva from the same model year and the quad 4 was standard for that small car.
@fernandorocha84592 жыл бұрын
I love this Buick Skylark
@Commentleaver-c6x8 ай бұрын
You should have considered moving closer to your job.
@tkewrestler26622 жыл бұрын
I have always had a soft spot for a 1992 Buick Skylark. The Buick Skylark was my driver’s education car in 1992. It was new and grey in color.
@mattwithoutyou2 жыл бұрын
mine was a pontiac bonneville of the same vintage
@TJ_9182 жыл бұрын
My driving school had 2 2000 Nissan Sentra SE-Rs, lol… they were all beat to hell by the time I came around (2006).
@TheCarCrazyGuy2 жыл бұрын
My drivers ed car was a 1978 Monte Carlo.
@tkewrestler26622 жыл бұрын
@Jackie Mcmillan the Skylark was a perfectly serviceable driver’s education car.
@mat131742 жыл бұрын
Mine was a Chevy celebrity
@sloick2 жыл бұрын
My dad was a Mopar man throughout his youth. The last new car he bought was a 90 or 91 Dodge Shadow. He rented one of these for a company trip and never bought anything but Buick ever again. He was blown away how much more power the Buick had over the Dodge but got better fuel mileage. I’ve owned several Buicks also. It all started with one these Skylarks.
@dronepilot260rc2 жыл бұрын
Thank god those seat belts attached to the door didn’t last long haha 😂
@bluerazor70492 жыл бұрын
I always wondered what was their problem, was it because of the electric motor in the door for the seatbelt being prone to fail or was it dangerous in a accident?
@herbiehusker18892 жыл бұрын
It was because of federal regulations. As soon as airbags became available, the door seat belts went bye bye.
@bluerazor70492 жыл бұрын
@@herbiehusker1889 fair point, but they were something for their time.
@carexpertandy2 жыл бұрын
@@bluerazor7049 Door mounted seat belts weren’t motorized. This only applies to shoulder belts buckled into the door frame.
@carexpertandy2 жыл бұрын
@@bluerazor7049 Also, the big problem with door mounted seat belts was if the doors popped open during a crash, it would leave the driver and passenger unrestrained.
@palebeachbum2 жыл бұрын
I was 10yrs old when these cars came out. They really caught my eye and I still think it's a striking looking car. Gorgeous from some angles and awkward from others. I never cared for the cheap interior materials. If this car met today's safety standards, I'd love to buy one new!
@wtgkb82 жыл бұрын
Drove a 1991 Olds Cutlass Ciera with the 3300 V6 3-spd auto in high school and college. That powertrain was bulletproof, and got 225k miles on it with just oil changes. I beat that that engine hard, but always kept the oil clean, and it never leaked or burnt oil. I would have gone over 300k with it, but someone pulled out in front of my dad one day he was driving it. Was no longer road worth after that. I could get 0-60 in 8-8.5 sec with it, so the 10 sec in the video seems slow to me.
@ericwhitehead64512 жыл бұрын
I was in my early 20's when this car came out, and I really liked it. Still do.
@celsovera912 жыл бұрын
John Davis, the OG car reviewer, paving the way for Doug Demuro, Tyler Hoover, Saabkyle04, Sofyan Bey, TFL, Jason Fenske, etc.
@Commentleaver-c6x8 ай бұрын
Thankfully he didn’t act like an idiot like all of them do.
@rafapenson7 ай бұрын
@@Commentleaver-c6xlooooool 🤣😂🤣😂
@wallybeegone2 жыл бұрын
My mom had this car! Super comfortable on road trips.
@Scott_From_Maine2 жыл бұрын
The most striking feature is that pointed bumper, not the grille. I love it!
@V8AmericanMuscleCar2 жыл бұрын
I like that too! It is recognizable with that bumper and it jumped out from other cars in that class in those years.
@jimmbobb2 жыл бұрын
I was thinking that too. How did he miss that bumper?!
@lobsterwhisperer79322 жыл бұрын
its ugly AF.
@McVaio5 ай бұрын
@@lobsterwhisperer7932 No u
@raymondhaley6185 Жыл бұрын
My little Buick,92-93 skylarks used the race proven 3300 V6 engine❤. 1:49
@OLDS982 жыл бұрын
Thank you for posting another GM video. It is always a nice surprise to see these. I still want to see that 1994 Oldsmobile Eighty-Eight video I saw on one of those marathon weekends before. I recall this car and the Buick Bolero concept car. Buick was on a roll with producing concept models and making them production cars. The front end of this car was so controversial. I know they updated the front end and interior in 1996. It lost that front end. It then was sharing its instrumentation panel with Oldsmobile Achieva. The Pontiac Grand Am was the clear winner during this time in sales and in appearance. Thank you again.
@lukerinderknecht29822 жыл бұрын
My family bought a used one in the early 2000's, so as a 16 y.o. borrowing the family car, I felt very self-conscious cruising around in this thing (it did drive well though). The grill point was one thing, but the bumper jutted out even more. Truly a sight to behold. Eventually GM would do a facelift and softened the look. Oh and, from what I recall, George Costanza drove one and I thought that was the perfect fit for him...
@cameronmiles6452 жыл бұрын
Think George had a Lebanon convertible actually!
@crocglox77972 жыл бұрын
George did drive one in at least one episode. Now I wonder besides the buick and the lebaron and Frank Costanza's cars, what else George drove?
@matthewbowen58412 жыл бұрын
@@crocglox7797 He had a Ford Contour, a mix of first and second gen W Body Regals and Centuries, an A Body Century, and borrowed Frank's Mercury Monarch, which led to it getting trashed thanks to his illegal handicap parking job. The Costanzas also were often in the interior of an aero Caprice, but I don't think they were ever shown in the car from outside.
@crocglox77972 жыл бұрын
@@matthewbowen5841 Also 1967 GTO, george borrowed from his dad in the episode when elaine called him a bad seed. It had a bottle of metamucil or geritol in there.
@thetechlibrarian2 жыл бұрын
That’s ok. I had to borrow a 1989 Pontiac Bonneville 2 of the 4 windows rolled down and 2 of the 4 doors opened
@toronado4552 жыл бұрын
0:49 that Park Avenue is BOOKING!
@McVaio5 ай бұрын
Yeah those are gorgeous.
@nickgee7291 Жыл бұрын
I used to think this car looked so interesting and quirky when I was younger. I liked the green one with those stipes.
@carsnstuff13442 жыл бұрын
I remember back in 1992 my Mom was ready to downsize from our 90 Grand Caravan LE into a smaller 4 door sedan. She test drove the Camry, Taurus, Sable, Accord, Lumina, ES300, and the Skylark. I recall on the Skylark test drive half way through that she hated it and wanted to return to the dealership. I'm not sure what she disliked but I'm pretty sure it was a 4cyl, not a GS. She ultimately bought the Accord LX.
@thebitlot2 жыл бұрын
They were pretty bad. Not as reliable (over 100s of thousands of cars so I don't need to hear stories from people who just so happened to have the one golden goose). 3 speed Automatics had worse fuel economy for cars that size. The 4 cyl was only an SOHC while (correct me if I'm wrong) many foreign offerings had DOHC available on both their 4 and 6 cyl options, plus 5 speed manuals or 4 speed autos which could more easily find an appropriate gear for road conditions. So Japanese cars could rev faster, had better specific power, better fuel economy, and greater reliability. Basically anything a Skylark could do, a Camry or Accord could do better.
@RallyLancer952 жыл бұрын
She made the right choice
@Thindoublechin Жыл бұрын
The 4 cylinder and the 3 speed auto was trash. If you floor it the engine cries like a kid getting kicked in the balls for the first time and fuel economy is equally pathetic.
@McVaio5 ай бұрын
She should have gone for the LeSabre, very comfy family car.
@KenanTurkiye2 жыл бұрын
3:23 ''...but initial drive shows that it makes noise faster than power'' what a compliment ! : )
@srcobra502 жыл бұрын
My first car to drive to high school was a 93 grand am gt with the 3.3 v6 3 speed auto. I miss that car. Wasn’t that quick but it was reliable and could take the daily Beating
@OldDood Жыл бұрын
We owned a 1994 Skylark Custom. I like the car. Was it the best car I have ever owned? No, not even close. However, it rode fairly well and got decent gas mileage for the times. It had a 3.1L engine that was reliable. I didge tired of replacing the Brakes and Rotors every 12 months to eighteen months though. The Rotors would 'Warp' from the snow and ice. I did cause damage to the transmission. From 'Rocking it' when I was stuck in snow. I ended up being to aggressive when she was stuck. I sold it to a mechanic that worked on my cars. Then I proceeded to go for larger cars. Our next car was a 1994 LeSabre Limited that I loved. With the 3800 Series #1 engine. I have posted on that car. We owned that car for 5 years and 207K miles. RUST was the death of that LeSabre Limited.
@darnellrobeson4761 Жыл бұрын
This probably was the most luxurious intermediate car of it's day. Plusher than all it's competition back then.
@kcindc55392 жыл бұрын
I rented one in May 1992 - we dubbed it “the Batmobile”
@DisneyMusicVideos2 жыл бұрын
I always liked the unique sharp looks of these cars. My high school friend had a 1995 Skylark that was previously his grandmothers.
@Anderson-ky6ps2 жыл бұрын
Carro desse é luxouso vendido nos EUA linda emocionante de dirigir
@gregg96722 жыл бұрын
Our neighbor had one when I was a teenager she bought it new it was a teal color she loved that car. I remember her out there every Saturday washing it and she was very elderly but just kept going.
@ramoncarter65852 жыл бұрын
Didn't blame her gotta love a Buick.
@jhomrich892 жыл бұрын
this is one car from the 90s i don't miss but however i can help but wonder what a performance version with a supercharged 3800, bucket seats, and high flow exhaust to compete with the taurus SHO would have been like
@marshalmagooo38992 жыл бұрын
Loved them, surprisingly reliable. Comfortable as heck
@Doc18552 жыл бұрын
A friend of mine has a 96 Grand AM with the V6. 27 years later and it runs, but is burning 2 quarts of oil between oil changes but he has 301K miles on it.
@McVaio5 ай бұрын
That's a very respectable mileage though
@Doc18555 ай бұрын
@@McVaio Absolutely it is. Especially for a domestic brand vehicle
@McVaio5 ай бұрын
@@Doc1855 I've always driven domestic, and all of my vehicles lasted for well over 200k miles without any drivetrain issues. But it depends on what you buy and how you maintain it. I don't see a Chevy Aveo as a domestic vehicle. I've instead bought high quality large American cars and SUVs with domestically developed V6 and V8 engines and transmissions. And they've always held up well. I've never had any transmission or engine problems. I do maintain all my vehicles by the book, and always have them serviced by official dealerships, even when they're 20+ years old. And again, I don't buy rebadged crap from Korea or Europe (such as the terrible Ford Fiesta for example).
@hillbillyinpa23172 жыл бұрын
I was on the team that wrote the first service manual for these cars. Engineered by LAD in Lansing and service manuals were handled by Oldsmobile Division. Great times and great people at Olds and LAD. Kind of miss those times.
@kendavid8912 жыл бұрын
My dad bought a 1998 Buick LeSabre cherry red,my Mom drove it,my dad settled for his Mopar minivan lol
@wmalden2 жыл бұрын
The Grand Am is the best looking of the three, in my opinion. I had a Skylark of this vintage for a rental car. It did get the attention of some “car guys.”
@scrambler69-xk3kv Жыл бұрын
My sister bought a Grand Am new, but I always thought those ridges on the side body cladding were ugly as hell.
@Commentleaver-c6x8 ай бұрын
@@scrambler69-xk3kvmy sister did too. I remember the radio messed up and you couldn’t adjust the volume.
@matthewwolfe45092 жыл бұрын
My first car was a 93 Gran Sport, bright red 2 door, black interior. Thought was a good looker and sporty back then when I was 16, not so sure now lol.
@mattg8369 Жыл бұрын
I loved these things when they came out, and still do.
@herbiehusker18892 жыл бұрын
The dynaride suspension is fantastic.
@raymondhaley6185 Жыл бұрын
This car was a substantial departure from traditional Buick think, and created a modern sedan that did have future potential with an even better concept car waiting in the wings the scepter the 92 used the 3300mfiV6/the concept car was slightly larger and featured the future Buick built 3.6 V6, unfortunately neither saw production.
@Infinitrium2 жыл бұрын
"The Quad OHC, it makes noise faster than power" Yes, that it did. I drove one in a 92 Grand Am for a few months years ago, Mr. Davis' opinion of that engine is apt.
@McVaio5 ай бұрын
I'm young and I wish I could buy a brand new Buick Roadmaster today. I don't need a car for my image, I need a car for what I want, which is comfort and roominess.
@bobwalsh3751 Жыл бұрын
Dear Christ this car is FUGLY...yet intriguing...
@bluerazor70492 жыл бұрын
Call me crazy but I love the look of the Skylark along with the other 90's crazy design car like the Chevy/Pontiac/Oldsmobile MPV's and such. They looked ugly to some but I adore them because of their design and interiors.
@paulnieder42362 жыл бұрын
I miss and loved that era. I was in high school when the new Lumina van debuted. I still think they're cool looking.
@bluerazor70492 жыл бұрын
@@paulnieder4236 agree, I understand why most people disliked them but I honestly applaud Pontiac, Chevrolet and Oldsmobile for going with the design. Very innovative and I honestly think that they set the standard for future minivans to come.
@fernandorocha9012 жыл бұрын
I love cars Oldsmobile, Pontiac, Chevrolet and Buick 1980s and 1990s. Greats, confortables and solid cars
@paulnieder42362 жыл бұрын
The movie Demolition Man featured many GM concept cars. Even the Lumina van was in it, but it looked far more futuristic than the final production model.
@Bull3tBikes2 жыл бұрын
By god what an odd looking car
@taurussho862 жыл бұрын
You must be young. This was actually a popular car. And to be honest, if was weird looking then too
@nothanksguy2 жыл бұрын
It looks like it stuffed a codpiece down its hood 🤣
@Sklounst_Actual2 жыл бұрын
@@taurussho86 That's .....what they said?
@Doc18552 жыл бұрын
It was actually a classy looking car in its day. GM also had an Oldsmobile with a lot of the same design quo’s. The Buick actually drove and handled better than the Oldsmobile. Many of the parts of those vehicles were made from Hyundai.
@chriskrueger82252 жыл бұрын
@@Doc1855 what parts were from Hyundai? I never heard that before and did a search and couldn't find anything.
@stephenwinter88922 жыл бұрын
Greetings from southern Ontario Canada my father had this exact model new as a company car used to cover the qew highway between London Ontario to Oshawa gm plant thanks for the presentation I drove it on weekends as we only had the ford tempo as my mom's car with no ac
@KenanTurkiye2 жыл бұрын
0:13 depressed trout mouth lol
@KenanTurkiye2 жыл бұрын
5:04 the tail lights while lit looks good with the rear end though.
@allanparks49422 жыл бұрын
Only a 3 speed auto in 1992?
@herbiehusker18892 жыл бұрын
Toyota had a 3 speed in the Corolla until 2002.
@rhythm_is_life2 жыл бұрын
@@herbiehusker1889 True, but only the base models. The '93 Corolla was available with a 4 speed auto in DX trim. The Skylark was also thousands of dollars more expensive than a base Corolla. The Skylark did get a 4-speed with the V6 in '95.
@hitek9too255 Жыл бұрын
@@herbiehusker1889 Corolla ia an economy car, this is a lexury car. This tells you all you need to know about GM back then.
@herbiehusker1889 Жыл бұрын
@@hitek9too255 no. The skylark was not a "lexury" car. It was the cheapest Buick you could get. Nicer than a Chevy, but more of a grandma car. If you wanted luxury in a Buick, you got a Park Avenue.
@ianyeh752 жыл бұрын
A sleek option that looks like an import…(describing the Achieva) 😂😂😂😂 You’re killing me, John!
@sk8terboi5102 жыл бұрын
Woohoo!! love seeing a new Retro Review dropped!!! But I just have to say… This turd could only be had with a *3* speed auto slush box and the top engine choice, an anemic 3L pushrod unit with 160hp!? Lord have mercy 😅😂 I’m so glad we’re long past that standard of cheap, uninspiring engineering that the big 3 loved to produce in bulk for the masses.
@roville2252 жыл бұрын
They had good power to weight ratio. That steering wheel tho..... 😆
@Jag-leaper2 жыл бұрын
Yeah I thought this was ugly looking back. In the day.....but I would proudly drive one today cause it's so unique 👌
@bluerazor70492 жыл бұрын
Me too, I just wish that Buick would go back to their roots and make their own cars rather than using rebaged Opel's. Don't get me wrong, Opel's are great cars but it's just not the same. If Buick goes back to designing their own cars, reintroducing their models or making new ones I'm sure that they would be talked about.
@herbiehusker18892 жыл бұрын
I had a friend that had one. I never thought it was ugly.
@Jag-leaper2 жыл бұрын
@@bluerazor7049 they aren't really opels anymore...their platforms are from chevrolet Korea now...formerly Daewoo.....with Chinese styling on the latest models..and possibly soon platforms.....opel is no longer part of gm...and is "basically" owned by Chrysler(stellantis) now
@bluerazor70492 жыл бұрын
@@Jag-leaper true, but some of the models are Opel related as I've seen them such as the SUV one.
@Jag-leaper2 жыл бұрын
The only opel base car they ever used was the regal(opel insignia)...the others are all korean
@dronepilot260rc2 жыл бұрын
Man I remember when these came out haha
@adamn75162 жыл бұрын
its crazy that in 92 GM was still using 3 speed autos in what was supposed to a quasi luxury model. 4 speed autos were pretty standard across japanese competitors even in their baser cars like the Corolla and Civic.
@scrambler69-xk3kv Жыл бұрын
Hell, I had a number of Chevys at the time with two speed Powerglide transmissions and they worked very well. A three speed would have been a bonus.
@adamn7516 Жыл бұрын
@@scrambler69-xk3kv Thats not the point though. GM and even Ford and Chrysler in the mid 80's and early 90's were still using the 3 speed auto on most of their cars during that period while the European and Japanese competition had moved onto 4 speed auto pretty much across their lines.
@jeffreypaul94282 жыл бұрын
So many gauges for John!
@gregg96722 жыл бұрын
Can someone find the motorweek review for the 95-97 Geo Metro I can't find it anywhere, or the 88-93 Ford Festiva
@dm53742 жыл бұрын
As an ex-pat I have always had a soft spot for American cars. This Skylark was by far the worst, horrendous car I'd ever rented stateside. With an engine capacity that would have been 7-series territory in those years, it was excruciating in every way.
@sydjaguar2 жыл бұрын
love these old videos. My favourite is the Buick LeBaron
@McVaio5 ай бұрын
Don't you mean Chrysler LeBaron?
@dakota47v82 жыл бұрын
Wow I remember when they released this new body style back in High School, it's soooooo ugly 🤣
@SnepperStepTV Жыл бұрын
I dig the Star Trek TNG vibes of the interior styling
@laszlopalkonyay41337 ай бұрын
From these cars, the 1992-95 Pontiac Grand An looked by far the best. I woukd even say it was the best looking mid size sedan and coupe from the early to mid 1990s.
@johnhenrymcmahon68782 жыл бұрын
I love this funky little Buick sedan. Wonderfully risk taking for those GM designers.
@jonathanfox6762 жыл бұрын
I love when John takes a full dump on gm. Man is a savage
@loganc19992 жыл бұрын
My favorite 90’s GM sedan
@Chitwn812 жыл бұрын
Hard to believe but in 92 Buick had 6 models to fill showrooms Skylark, Century, Regal, Lesabre, Roadmaster, and Park Avenue....top bad by this time the revered Skylark name was a shell of its former self compared to a 70 Skylark GS with a 455 cu v8
@outdoorvideoswithbrad2 жыл бұрын
I got one of these but it’s a little newer, I wish I had thin whitewalls, with the low skirts in the back looks like a original gangster car haha
@Sweetwater201207 ай бұрын
I had a 93 Olds Achieva I loved it
@oldtwinsna83472 жыл бұрын
Always somehow thought these had the 3.8 engines in them. Vehicle has the look of power, but the performance of an economy.
@ElectoneGuy2 жыл бұрын
What demented GM engineer designed this horrific Grand Am rebadge?
@OLDS982 жыл бұрын
Mr. Wayne Kady was the head of Buick design at the time. There are interviews of him on You Tube.
@McVaio5 ай бұрын
@@OLDS98I love the serious and factual reply to that lol.
@ramoncarter65852 жыл бұрын
This and it's sibling Achieva we're my favorites besides liked the Grand AM all siblings weren't bad cars just avoid Quad 2.4 had numerous problems. I haven't seen a Skylark in a while did like face-lift for 96-98 models sure miss these old Buicks wish GM will bring back the Buick sedans.
@RaymondHaley-tz4do9 ай бұрын
Was a nice car, but lacked real Buick power after 1993
@bghoody56652 жыл бұрын
That Bolero concept car looked pretty good.
@kowalski55992 жыл бұрын
Was the 3300 regarded as a decent engine? We had one in our '89 Buick Century growing up and NEVER had an issue in almost 15 years, but was that fluke or were they regarded as reliable?
@hellkitty10142 жыл бұрын
3300 was more reliable than the 3.1s of that era, which some of those suffered head gasket issues.
@CatalinaSkybird2 жыл бұрын
The 3300 was a smaller version of the 3800. Was a pretty reliable engine.
@pbfloyd132 жыл бұрын
I don't know how anybody in Buicks design studio looked at the final shape of the Skylark and said "yes this will appeal to the under 30 crowd" IN 1992!
@jimmbobb2 жыл бұрын
The 3300 was underpowered even for 90's standards. Should've definitely been mated to a 4speed.
@brandondavis76952 жыл бұрын
so which one got the axe first? the Achieva or the Skylark?
@dodgeguyz2 жыл бұрын
These things were everywhere back then, which just goes to show you………alot of people had no sense of style!
@josemontano77679 ай бұрын
I always liked this car. I always wanted one.(the Grand AM)
@OnTheRocks712 жыл бұрын
Radical styling = Looks more mundane than a Taurus from 1986. Inspired by the show car = A complete departure from an actual nice looking design exercise that looks like the designers gave a shit.
@jst77142 жыл бұрын
The rear angles look like a Roadmaster that shrunk in the wash, and the front looks like a Bunkie Beak Thunderbird. I don’t really mind the exterior look, but the dashboard ruins it for me.
@ExiledWolf842 жыл бұрын
A friend of mine had one of these is high school. He called it "The beak".
@ThePurePlayaz2 жыл бұрын
Grand Am looks way better.. Can't believe they decided to keep Buick over Ponti.
@toronado4552 жыл бұрын
Blame China😉
@DisneyMusicVideos2 жыл бұрын
Agreed! Buick sells very well in China, but not in the US.
@DonkeyKong22222 жыл бұрын
7:04 - DAMN CLIBBINS
@pentium4guy6392 жыл бұрын
HADDA LAYERDOEN HOSS GOBLESS
@lukerinderknecht29822 жыл бұрын
hELL YEAH BORTHER❗❗❗❗
@donaldhollums32782 жыл бұрын
"Wouldn't you really rather have a Buick?"
@arcata316 ай бұрын
GM showcar- AMAZING! Production version- BLECH! Snatching fails ceaselessly is GM's philosophy.
@markbehr882 жыл бұрын
For so e reason I love these.
@douglasb.12032 жыл бұрын
Harve & Gladys (them there young buyers) sure loved their Skylark.
@RoadCone4112 жыл бұрын
I never did like the styling of these cars, would have preferred any of the other N-cars just based on looks alone. This car was overly plasticky inside and very kitschy outside, Buick obviously trying not to upset their older clientele yet still standout. The result is not pleasing to me. There were some changes to the production model vs the pre-production model tested, I noticed. Seems GM was having thoughts about the grille too.
@shroomyesc Жыл бұрын
I don't understand regulations of the time, you need low speed bumpers for "safety" but you can have jousting lance at the front of a buick
@dohc10672 жыл бұрын
I am on the fence with the styling, but the interior isn't bad. Good ergonomics, split folding seats, low lift over, and the v6.
@BluePhoenix20132 жыл бұрын
Skylark is a fancy version of Grand Am
@averyparticularsetofskills Жыл бұрын
That last line😂🤣
@mstarr34692 жыл бұрын
This was one of the most ugly cars ever made, When I see cars like this it's amazing how GM didn't go out of business. They deserved too. I just cant believe people at GM said it looks great lets build it.
@catjudo1 Жыл бұрын
I remember the N body cars and briefly considered the Achieva coupe. Looked great but typical GM quality issues, cheap interiors and the buzzy Quad 4 muted the appeal. The door mounted seatbelts were a deal breaker and drove me to buy a used CRX Si instead. No regrets.
@Jswag29296 ай бұрын
Looks like it’s saying “please drive me, we can go to bingo “
@brianreardon77002 жыл бұрын
The new for 92 grand am gt was by far the best effort by GM with there N body cars.
@SolamenteVees2 жыл бұрын
George Costanza’s other car…
@raptor_boss64022 жыл бұрын
It amazes me everytime one of these retro reviews comes out. Because most of the these cars I’ve never heard or seen. Of course I was born in 2001 but…still to this day never really see a clean car like this in modern day traffic. Either they are modded or rusted out. Or parked and never driven again. Quite sad really. But it’s just me.🤷🏻♂️
@Trance882 жыл бұрын
Not a fan of the front of this car. It looks like a bird beak. That interior is pretty awesome though for a 1992. Of the N Body cars, I'd choose a Grand Am over the other options.
@fathermetalASMR2 жыл бұрын
I'm a Mopar guy but the Skylark is a GM vehicle I would love to own. 🇺🇲
@mattg50222 жыл бұрын
I could not stand this THING when it came out. As a younger person at the time I just thought GM as a company was hopeless, producing so much undesirable junk like this, wasting raw materials - "Skylark" looks like a cartoon designed by people who cynically do not care and hate their job - its like a car you have when you are out of options . . . it was 1992 - GM still had vast resources, it could have done MUCH better . . . I thought the name was totally out of touch too in 1992. Now I will watch the entire review.
@sneakerfreak20022 жыл бұрын
Sounds like you were just 2 kewl 4 skool
@hitek9too255 Жыл бұрын
I always tought the front was meant to draw off of it's name by looking like a bird.
@JDMHaze2 жыл бұрын
Goodness, these things were so ugly. I always hated these.
@ljmorris64962 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised they didn't mention the Corsica/Beretta
@stiffneck20902 жыл бұрын
Never liked FWD front wheel drive or the little engines that came with it. Loved the 1970-72 Buick Skylark and the 1970GSX that is worth a lot of money today. I blame part of this on CARE or Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards for all of these GM/Ford/Chrysler look alike egg shaped little cars. For 1994 I bought a used F-150 pick-up and never owned a car since. The government has no right to dictate the fuel economy of a privately purchased vehicle from a Business. Don't totally blame Manufactures for building cars people don't want. Today, I currently pretend that my 2021 Dodge Ram truck is a 1975 Buick Electra, Oldsmobile 98, or Chrysler New Yorker LOL 😇
@JJPMustang2 жыл бұрын
“The government has no right to dictate the fuel economy of a privately purchased vehicle from a Business”. Yea they do…