Murray Gell-Mann - The Yang-Mills theory (72/200)

To listen to more of Murray Gell-Mann’s stories, go to the playlist: • Murray Gell-Mann (Scie...
New York-born physicist Murray Gell-Mann (1929-2019) was a theoretical physicist. His considerable contributions to physics include the theory of quantum chromodynamics. He was awarded the 1969 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on the theory of elementary particles. [Listener: Geoffrey West; date recorded: 1997]
TRANSCRIPT: In the ’40s mathematics moved from its traditional way of presenting results to a highly abstract approach favored by Bourbaki, this group of French purists. And it became forbidden to explain in a mathematics article what you were going to do; or what you had done when you finished; to give any motivation; to give any non-trivial examples even. You could give a trivial example in a line or two, but you were not allowed to give, to explore a non-trivial examples. And as a result mathematics and science, particularly physics, drifted apart where previously they'd had a lot of mutual stimulation. It was very sad and I'm glad that later on the trend moved in the opposite direction to some extent.
In any case, I was quite impressed with… with the Yang-Mills theory although I didn't see how in its precise form it was applicable to anything. An exact gauge invariant theory with the group SU(2), and I didn't know what that would apply to. But I assumed that it would be very important some day in some connection, especially if we could develop a soft mechanism for breaking its symmetry; but I didn't see how to do that at the time. I didn't… I don't imagine that in ’55 I was already thinking about how, in a Yang-Mills world, knowing about symmetries would tell you almost immediately about dynamics. That's something I understood only much later, but it's certainly true.

[@peterhall6656]

The Bourbaki school has been mercilessly pissed on by the late Vladimir Arnold who was very insulting about French mathematicians.

[@Bestofchatgpt]

I'm calling my next video "in a Yang-Mills world"

[@shashankchandra1068]

Wtf is Mass gap?? Mass gap between which two things ??? I never understood that till today....

[@yungsmut5743]

I think it’s atoms

[@batuhankaynakacar834]

Between vacuum(ground state) and the next excited state.

[@Bestofchatgpt]

10k views and no comment?

[@anywallsocket]

And that’s yours??

[@djtan3313]

This sheet is hard.

[@Jon.B.geez.]

It’s sad to see physicists believe that just because something isn’t physics, it’s meaningless. What happened with Grothendieck’s movement is that math went far beyond physics, and physics was left behind. This wasn’t sad. Indeed, later on physics became heavily influenced by algebraic methods Andre (forget his last name), the fields medalist from Columbia. Almost all analytic methods that I know developed an algebraic flavor in physics, and indeed, all of the quantum forces were later recognized as group symmetries as he alluded to at the end. Of course, Gell-Mann always criticized literally everything that wasn’t his work, so it’s not surprising to see him view algebraic geometry as “sad”. In fact, I’d bet a nut that alg geom will have a large thing to say about unifying quantum theory and relativity.

[@parvdize3968]

Grothendieck is a true genius

[@evalsoftserver]

Dark energy exsist in a Space configuration using automorphism to auto regulate or (engauge)the amount of energy , time , Velocity {frequency) , and Volume required to Transform particle matter of that SPACE ( FIELD), at that specific location ,` or at any future location in that Space Time, Ex. photons or light like particles Traveling in a straight line at a Fraction of speed of light (Ecludiean spaceTime) gives rise to Baryonic mass like particles fields ,ex like matter electron proton ect. thru When ( Riemann space) gravity, electromagnetic, nuclear Strong force is engaged thru Baryionic Field Boson interaction the electromagnetic Photon Particle enters and engages Curvatured Space. Reaching infinite mass for that particle wave location causing a curved Deceleration we call gravity.and Electromagnetism Entanglement happens by Shears TRANSFORMATION of this Baryonic mass/particle/ when Space itself shears and Rotates So all FIELD in that Space Orients itself, to a common point enabling one PARTICLES to exist as a Wave in Two Different SPACES or fields. and Because Information travels in a Linear fashion in 3 Dimension Space , We olny become Aware of this Spacetime Information by attempting to Communicate outside our everyday 4 Dimensional Spacetime . and Not Seeing ,or Receiving anything back then we say mass is missing, Entangled particles don't need this Same Time information to Communicate because it Exists at every point in the Entangled PARTICLES WAVE own SpaceTime Coordinates that merged at a single Point .So Entaganelment is a Attractive Force, While Baryonic space is a Repulsive Force Running Away from Itself So Dark Matter Could be a Non-Localized Spacetime like a Black Hole with Equally distributed gravitational mass and inertial mass .Analysis of high velocity Nuetrino burst from Gamma rays as Observed from our 4 Dimensional Spacetime Frame of Reference might confirm this.

[@MrReevers]

Sir, this is a Wendy's

[@tretolien1195]

Where in the world do you get these bold assertions from?

[@evalsoftserver]

@@tretolien1195 I combined Noethers theories on SYMMETRY of Space with the UNIFIED FIELDS theory to reach this conclusion that Particle wave duality doesn't need to exsist in the same DIMENSIONS or Space time Coordinate

[@samblock4937]

@@evalsoftserver bro you are so fake. This is word salad lmao fuck off

[@VPN14494]

@@samblock4937 This is what throwing some jargon sounds like, it is implemented by politicians of the world harnessing their sheer ability to emit the tangential rhetoric to influence the amygdala to strengthen the hyperbolic psychological processes courtesy of the non-linear evolution of the species reverting back and/or more often than not branching into different probabilistic distribution akin to that of the plethora of coin tosses giving a binomial distribution. Then the spectrum of the response of the masses is analysed using the small deviation from rationality approximation to actually gauge the impact of the rhetoric, the standard mean deviation actually signifies the error in modelling the real world so the assumptions are tweaked further to match the observed data. You see almost any grammatically sound argument with some technical jargon can help one get laid, it is a responsibility and a virtue to not use it mindlessly. 😂😂😂