Last year we covered the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar (kzbin.info/www/bejne/oJypindth8SLn8k).... this year we take a look at the DC-10!
@skaarff6 жыл бұрын
Sixteen seconds ago, this comment was posted.
@skaarff6 жыл бұрын
Also, L-1011 Tristar is the best plane I've ever seen.
@higgme1ster6 жыл бұрын
I loved the Lockheed L-1011!
@hh86386 жыл бұрын
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
@eternal59306 жыл бұрын
Could you do a vid on the N1 rocket?
@SlamTF25 жыл бұрын
the aesthetic of that 70's/80's clip of the DC-10 going over the highway at the beginning is so top notch.
@emmaherron51214 жыл бұрын
ChesterDaMemeMaster it’s beautiful. I loved the old AA livery and the DC10 looks absolutely stunning.
@masonmtb74 жыл бұрын
SWP 215 its in Los Angeles at Los Angeles International
@HydroSheep4 жыл бұрын
0:50
@B3burner4 жыл бұрын
Airport taxiway overpasses over airport roadways is nothing new. Doesn’t DFW have the same thing? Having lived in the San Fernando Valley as a kid, I also remember a small tunnel on Sherman Way, that goes under a runway at Van Nuys airport.
@justinkrizenesky4 жыл бұрын
@@B3burner Sky Harbor has a similar system as well
@endrioinfiniti4 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Avoiding boarding the DC-10 won't make you avoid any crashes, the aircraft literally destroyed a Concorde with its metal piece lying on the runway.
@mememan2.0743 жыл бұрын
@@Batman-wv5ng what?
@barrechor43453 жыл бұрын
@@Batman-wv5ng So the spacer shot forwards and up into the engine??
@Crusher1033 жыл бұрын
@@Batman-wv5ng no he is right, a piece fell off a DC-10 right before Concorde used the same runway. It caused the problem when concorde ran over it and the tire that burst hit the fuel tank. Continental airlines were even held liable for their plane dropping parts on the runway and had to pay 70% of the compensation.
@kleenexbox9743 жыл бұрын
@@Batman-wv5ng why should we believe you you cant even spell media
@kleenexbox9743 жыл бұрын
@@Batman-wv5ng no you dont, if you did then you would know proper grammar
@jimgordon88632 жыл бұрын
My dad was a captain with Delta. He made the inaugural passenger flight of the L-1011 for Delta in November 1972. I remember flying that plane a lot. My dad loved that airplane. He also made the first Cat-3 landing (zero visibility) with that plane in Atlanta. The airport was closed, but he was given permission to land.
@canerguener8664 Жыл бұрын
Automatic landing system?
@aggieengineer2635 Жыл бұрын
Cat III is not zero visibility. Three hundred feet visibility. Not a lot, but not zero. Delta used autoland.
@Pwj579 Жыл бұрын
My dad also flew the L-1011 for Delta , but in the late 1980s. He loved Lockheed as he also flew P-3s in the USN and USNR. He hated McDonnell Douglas aircraft. Referred to the DC-10 as death cruiser and the MD-88s as the “mad dog”. His favorite aircraft that he flew at Delta were the L-1011, 757, 767 and 727 in that order. Least favorite MD-88/90, DC-9 and 737-800.
@aggieengineer2635 Жыл бұрын
@@Pwj579 I've got about 2800 hours in the KC-10 from the military in the '80s. I loved it. Delightful handling characteristics and very reliable. Unlike Boeing, very quiet cockpit. I've got over 20,000 hours now in the 737 in six variants. The -700 is my favorite to fly, the -800 probably the least favorite. The MAX is the first quiet one. I rather like it.
@Pwj579 Жыл бұрын
@@aggieengineer2635 thanks for the reply! First, thank you for your service in the USAF /ANG flying the big gas can in the sky. Weren’t the KC-10s among the last DC-10 airframes produced? Probably got all the bugs out. My dad avoided the MD-11 while at Delta, because of their reputation. Would love to hear more about your experience in the 737 Max. Seems like the 737-600/700 were the best of the NGs. All that extra length and weight for the 800/900 my dad thought made it handle poorly.
@albertoolmos21 Жыл бұрын
I only traveled once on a DC-10 VARIG flight on my honeymoon. Couple seats were reserved for us and a wedding cake with congratulations from the cockpit made the trip a real party. I enjoyed the plane and trip, until it landed. From there, the rest of my life was the real disaster. I did not know that the dangerous reputation was that of my wife.
@Account_abandoned-q7m Жыл бұрын
😂
@rosstheboss8633 Жыл бұрын
Varig, brasileiro.
@Account_abandoned-q7m Жыл бұрын
@@rosstheboss8633 Sim
@offspringfan89 Жыл бұрын
Claramente foi culpa do avião 😂
@rosstheboss8633 Жыл бұрын
22 or 13@@Account_abandoned-q7m
@BeechComer6 жыл бұрын
The ad at the end in the guise of a airline cabin announcement, complete w/ "safety instruction" booklet is ***brilliant***!
@Edax_Royeaux6 жыл бұрын
@beechComer I'm not sure Squarespace wants to be associated with the Death Contraption-10.
@emilyhornett24926 жыл бұрын
Love that name
@mwbgaming286 жыл бұрын
Still didn't watch it though
@dosmastrify6 жыл бұрын
No it was Squarespace :P
@nomadnametab6 жыл бұрын
ladies and gentlemen, this is the captain speaking.....WE'RE DOOMED! DOOMED I SAY!
@karimbelba55973 жыл бұрын
“The company that built it never fully recovered from its misstep” Boeing: *laughs nervously*
@jennaw7233 жыл бұрын
Right? Weird how Boeing did exactly the same crap after it bought MD. Someone once said MD used Boeings money to buy Boeing. What a shame.
@livethefuture24923 жыл бұрын
Boeing, unfortunately, inherited the MD management and attitude of cost-cutting, leading to another high-profile fleet grounding(737MAX).
@cefb89233 жыл бұрын
@@jennaw723 What same crap? Did you not just watch the video.. it was just explained that really neither incident was MD's fault. You could argue that MD should have made an easier to use or better train ground personnel on how to close the door.. but its not their fault that it wasn't closed properly. The AA incident was because mechanics were slamming the engine into the pylon mounts with a forklift during engine changes.. which again wasn't the procedure that was to be used per the DC10 manual. You're worse than the people back then, you were literally just presented the information. You would figure the internet would make people more intelligent, but if something requires effort and research..
@suchirghuwalewala3 жыл бұрын
@@cefb8923 the DC 10 and 737 MAX both had flaws which were inadequately "solved" by their manufacturers
@lyianx3 жыл бұрын
You know whats funny? Boeing BOUGHT McDonald Douglas. They are effectively, the same company now.
@steatopigeon6 жыл бұрын
Man, the production value on your videos is just through the roof. I'm not usually super interested in aviation, but this content is great.
@runpandarun096 жыл бұрын
Especially the ending haha
@rizh58896 жыл бұрын
Quality over content evrytime. This is the most underrated channel on KZbin.
@LordTrayus3 жыл бұрын
The DC-10: a plane so bad that it wasn't satisfied with destroying itself. It had to take down Concorde with it.
@alexlo77083 жыл бұрын
DC - Death to Concorde. It told early.
@alex5485543 жыл бұрын
Solid anti competition strategy if i heard of one...
@declannewton25563 жыл бұрын
But it did expose some flaws in Concorde though.
@dihydrogenmonoxide92103 жыл бұрын
@@declannewton2556 it wasn't a concorde's fault things fell out of a dc10
@dihydrogenmonoxide92103 жыл бұрын
@Shanghai You do understand that the fuel tank was hit and not the engine directly? The Concorde consumed so much fuel that it made it impossible to have small fuel tanks or less no:s of them.None of the earlier tire bursts were fatal either
@marvelgoh56485 жыл бұрын
Boeing 737 Max: *Grounded DC-10: First time?
@radovanlukic32675 жыл бұрын
HAHAHAHHA GOOD ONE
@mercurianrepublic59435 жыл бұрын
Hehehe.Nice.
@andrewc11995 жыл бұрын
DC-10: I’m the most dangerous airplane 737 MAX Series: Hold my beer!
@andrewc11995 жыл бұрын
@The random youtuber The 747 wasn't grounded for months...
@asyraff97195 жыл бұрын
You have the same pfp as me
@fordxbgtfalcon4 жыл бұрын
I’ve flown on the DC-10 several times and I didn’t even die once...
@supernovawars17524 жыл бұрын
One kilobyte of ram Congrats... Hehe
@r3ski8124 жыл бұрын
Wow
@FARMERHARDY4 жыл бұрын
I flew one and died instantly
@shengyi17014 жыл бұрын
I flew it from Copenhagen via SAS DC-10 to Bangkok and vice versa ... still here. USAF uses it as the KC-10A Extender
@jerrymartin70194 жыл бұрын
Liar!
@air-headedaviator18056 жыл бұрын
You never see commercials for aircraft anymore
@Xilog6 жыл бұрын
Makes me wonder what happened?
@theminipetabyte46106 жыл бұрын
@@Xilog People care about prices now more than the wow of the plane.
@nooranik216 жыл бұрын
False I've seen a lot of 787 ads also ads for 737 MAX.
@rizh58896 жыл бұрын
Cuz the technology hasn't really changed or innovated. Just improved upon
@rizh58896 жыл бұрын
@@nooranik21 by boeing, for buyers. Not for travellers.
@needbettername85833 жыл бұрын
DC10: See that guy Concorde over there? Thinks he so great. I'm gonna show him....
@scimagin56306 жыл бұрын
The quality of 3D animation are so fantastic! A huge leap from your previous videos. Thanks again for bringing us such a good and inspiring content 🙂
@void_skyy6 жыл бұрын
agreed
@scimagin56306 жыл бұрын
S G Yeah, as an amateur 3D animator myself. I was creating plane model before in Blender and its prove that I need to learn more about texturing and detailing the model
@void_skyy6 жыл бұрын
Scimagin cool hope you get better at it ima sub to u
@void_skyy6 жыл бұрын
there I subbed
@scimagin56306 жыл бұрын
S G Thanks a lot, but I need to remind you that I’m not quite active as a creator for now due to irl stuff 😅 Just watching great video like this to get new idea.
@AmalDevYT5 жыл бұрын
*Boeing 737 MAX 8 Entered the Chat*
@Apoindeed5 жыл бұрын
Amal Dev U just like McDonnel Douglas knew about the Cargo Door Issue, Boeing knew about MCAS issues. Also they tricked the FCC into getting the Airworthiness Certificate. Just like McDonnel Douglas did with the DC10. I hope Boeing drowns just like McDonnel Douglas did!
@tidan45755 жыл бұрын
@@Apoindeed I've heard from my uncle who works at Boeing saying it was actually the other way around. McDonnel Douglas bought out Boeing but kept the name to clear their reputation.
@Apoindeed5 жыл бұрын
Joseph Corley no, with that debt they didnt. They certainly were not in the Financial position to even buy a grocery store. The staggering debt that they accumulated through all the lawsuits was certainly not gonna let then buy Boeing. So it definitely was the other way around
@tidan45755 жыл бұрын
@@Apoindeed settling the lawsuits despite it being the largest in history at the time (somewhere around 18 million in 1970's money) was like getting a speeding ticket to a large corporation like McDonald-Douglas. The real losses would be from customers that stop buying their products, which is what ended up happening especially since the cold war was ending. They still had PLENTY of money to spare and invest and discuss a merging with Boeing before it dried up from the upkeep of keeping the company running.
@carlosgameplay67765 жыл бұрын
True
@AllecJoshuaIbay5 жыл бұрын
Despite its terrible start, I love this airplane.
@perlajeansibal81714 жыл бұрын
Hi Allec
@mgsaviation92924 жыл бұрын
Same
@kona7024 жыл бұрын
@@747heavyboeing3 Wow I just looked that up. Awesome! What a great plane!!
@747heavyboeing34 жыл бұрын
@@kona702 outlasted the Tristar by decades.
@seansands4244 жыл бұрын
I like the both of the plans the tristar and the DC 10
@DangerB0ne Жыл бұрын
The DC-10 still flies as the USAF KC-10 Extender. It was a bit of a shock to see the old trijet when I was on deployment recently.
@Plugneedsahug Жыл бұрын
i love those refuelers and the kc-135
@lsymfr5795 Жыл бұрын
FedEx still uses it too
@Plugneedsahug Жыл бұрын
@@lsymfr5795 fedex is goated
@lsymfr5795 Жыл бұрын
@@Plugneedsahug it's funny once a FedEx one came through the crew forgot to set the parking break causing it to roll back into the chock and because we normally do not get cargo airplanes we didn't have the equipment to get it unstuck and the crew refused to use the engines to get it unstuck. At the end they used the third engine at the stop move the airplane
@Plugneedsahug Жыл бұрын
@@lsymfr5795 that sounds cool and really annoying for you at the same time 😅
@ahayling02224 жыл бұрын
8:18 "Is there a secret drinker at the back?" Airbus's snarky remark on the MD DC-10's Trijet tail.
@JosephGelis4 жыл бұрын
I remember taking off in one of these flying boxcars back in the 80s when leaving Pearl Harbor to fly home after a tour of duty in the Navy. It felt so loose like the whole thing was about to come apart as it left the runway. I had been on the comparable L1011 a number of times and it was always a wonderfully smooth ride. I avoided the DC-10 as often as I could from then on.
@josepharnold84224 жыл бұрын
November 1979 I would fly to Germany for a military assignment. I would walk out on the tarmac at McGuire AFB and would see the aircraft we would board to Germany-- a DC-10. Oh the horror. The aircraft did get everyone safely to Germany and two years later I would take a DC-10 back to the States.
@slowpoke31024 жыл бұрын
@@josepharnold8422 : Your full of it, put your dress back on honey.
@jcheck63 жыл бұрын
@@slowpoke3102 Ha! I may have flown him as I was on the -10 and flew many times to Hawaii. Loved the plane.
@slowpoke31023 жыл бұрын
@@jcheck6 : Thanks a little truth somewhere, less religulous mobster takeover by legitimized armed robbery. . .
@spaghetti90673 жыл бұрын
It did feel like it was going to fall apart it was when it would fall apart
@mathisr.445 жыл бұрын
*"...it went from being the pride of airlines, one that people would think twice about flying"* ...like the Boeing 737 MAX
@Pippet5 жыл бұрын
*curb your enthusiasm plays*
@dmannevada59815 жыл бұрын
Wow, that was original.
@declannewton25565 жыл бұрын
Still wouldn't think twice about flying the MAX. Or flying in general.
@sauercrowder5 жыл бұрын
737 Max was never going to be the pride of airlines
@mathisr.445 жыл бұрын
@@sauercrowder unfortunately.
@MrGman2804 Жыл бұрын
A classmate of mine lost their father on a DC10 over Paris. The Turkish Airlines THY981 Paris to London on 3/3/74 went down after an explosive decompression caused the floor to collapse, disrupting controls, and causing the total loss of control after the cargo door fell off. This classmate never was the same again. My father knew the father who died. They both worked for British Airways. I always wanted to be a pilot, and although only aged 10 at the time of the crash, it was easy to understand what happened. I never ever flew on one of those things. I always avoided booking a flight that used one. The classmate appeared depressed for the rest of their school years. I can only imagine the terror of being aboard that thing. Given a cargo door had already fallen off, I hated McDonnell Douglas forever, and I still do. That accident should never have happened. What an evil thing to allow such a pitiful design fault to go un-checked for commercial gain when it had already happened before! Disgraceful.
@rodbutler4054 Жыл бұрын
The DC10 was a competitor for the Lockheed 1011. The L1011 was better.
@MrGman2804 Жыл бұрын
@@rodbutler4054 Yes, well the L1011 crashed less. A friend of mines father flew one. Sadly, I never went on the L1011. It just never came up on the flights I took which were mainly LHR to USA or mainland Europe with mainly BA, which meant mainly Boeings at that time.
@suspense_comix3237 Жыл бұрын
I haven't experienced flying on any McDonnell Douglas Aviation planes or products, nor have I had something like this happen to me, and I *still* hate McDonnell Douglas despite not trying their products. It's like hating on Nintendo for not trying the Nintendo Switch, or hating on Apple because you believe that their products in general suck. You're probably right, but also somewhat wrong.
@suspense_comix3237 Жыл бұрын
@@MrGman2804 Not everyone went on the glamorous and probably luxurious L-1011. Don't worry about it. I wish I went on one too. Sadly I'm a Gen Z and the last L-1011 flew in the 1980's or 90's.
@sadiqjohnny77 Жыл бұрын
Douglas had already issued a modification for the cargo door. But it was not marked urgent. In the meantime our F/Es closed the aft cargo door before flight. The Paris DC-10 COULD have survived if the pilot had known that the control wires for the AUTOPILOT were routed through the roof of the cabin. Engaging the autopilot and carrying out an autoland was possible. NOT the pilot's fault. Very few pilots knew about this. After the crash result was published I flew to Tokyo where we did our simulator training and checks and, with the help of the JAL sim people , reproduced the problem and trained my pilots on how to deal with it. Loved the DC 10--a beautiful aircraft with a great performance. Don't hate MD or the DC 10 it was bad ground handling at Orly that killed the Turkish DC-10.
@arandomguy73886 жыл бұрын
Amazing editing, I appreciate your efforts. Not even some TV programs have this high quality content 👍
@MilitantGrunt6 жыл бұрын
Much agreed.
@aeonjoey3d6 жыл бұрын
i know. gaaaawwww, i'm going to the patreon to subscribe now, it's that good.
@dankfrenkvisser59776 жыл бұрын
Keep it up man. I have little paticular interest in aviation, but i always keep coming back for your videos. I don't know how you make them, but their quality is overwhelming. Both in visuals and in storytelling. You deserve way more subscribers
@Xyb3rTeCh6 жыл бұрын
@@adibmouhanna6823 your comment does not have any link at all. What the fuck you talking about.
@dankfrenkvisser59776 жыл бұрын
@@adibmouhanna6823 whut?
@cwg731606 жыл бұрын
adib mouhanna Wtf are you talking about?
@cwg731606 жыл бұрын
adib mouhanna You mean how AF4590 was loaded above its approved takeoff weight, unevenly distributed, and missing a spacer on its left main landing gear?
@Xyb3rTeCh6 жыл бұрын
@@adibmouhanna6823 please make your own comment or thread. You don't have to reply to someone else post.
@jaiswalji15 жыл бұрын
Literally 90% of the comments here about the 737 Max.
@unflexian4 жыл бұрын
The other 20% are about the Concord.
@tiluriso4 жыл бұрын
The 737 Max is the new flying brick, the new turkey...
@dknowles604 жыл бұрын
@@Star737_yt no it is not
@ecpgieicg4 жыл бұрын
Cuz the parallel and the irony that McDonald Douglas was merged into Boeing. (No, it was in no position to have "bought up Boeing" like an earlier comment suggested.)
@Pcarnevaaa4 жыл бұрын
“ The 737 mAx is GoInG BaCk in the SkiEs tHiS YeAr.” Cue the sponge bob meme.
@MrDdefos Жыл бұрын
I have flown on the DC10 countless times. The last time was on a Northwest Airlines flight from Minneapolis in 1994. It was truly like a flying living room. The first time I flew on a DC10, it had a breakfast buffet. Those kind of aircraft comforts are long gone.
@MindBodySoulOk6 ай бұрын
I flew many as well and the old 747 with the upstairs bar which I enjoyed as a teen over international waters. Oh while smoking like a stack lol
@ZombieRofl6 жыл бұрын
That Squarespace cracked me up. They are lucky to have you.
@x50music6 жыл бұрын
Your videos are dangerously good, literally turn me into a procrastinator
@a-10thunderbolt305 жыл бұрын
It also ended the era of Concorde
@DrForrester875 жыл бұрын
No, it just made the end flashy. The price of operating Concorde is what ended it. And more accurately, the airline operating the DC-10 using shoddy after market parts was responsible for the metal on the runway, not the design of the plane...and c'mon...what tard designs a plane the explodes into flames just because a tire blows?
@DrForrester875 жыл бұрын
@flip inheck I never said Concorde exploded. At least not until it hit the ground as a flaming wreck.
@scrmepal5 жыл бұрын
@@DrForrester87 Your comment shows up your ignorance and jealousy, perhaps?
@DrForrester875 жыл бұрын
@@scrmepal jealously of what?
@scrmepal5 жыл бұрын
@@DrForrester87 ........jealousy of the Concorde!..........the Concorde was not a tard as you say!
@周生生-f1f2 жыл бұрын
Hilariously enough the DC-10 for all its Daily Crash memes is also one hell of a tough machine, one survived the extreme maneuvers it was never ever meant to be capable of by the Fedex 705 crew and is still in service till this day totalling for about 30 something years
@jmetro54562 жыл бұрын
daily crash 10
@AlexandreG Жыл бұрын
Would not be me to enter that old thing
@ecclestonsangel Жыл бұрын
It's retired now. There are a very small handful of MD-11s left, but they, too are scheduled for the boneyard next year.(2024)
@ecclestonsangel Жыл бұрын
@AFilipinoJapanese sorry, mate. They're well over 40 years old. Time to go.
@hitlersmissingtesticle69 Жыл бұрын
@@jmetro5456death chamber 10
@MultiCappie5 жыл бұрын
I flew in a Canadian Airlines DC-10 (ex- Canadian Pacific Airlines) in 1994, from Toronto to Calgary. I found it to be the noisiest airliner I can still remember. Surprised to see it was once considered quiet!
@drewburk63093 жыл бұрын
Its cargo door was probably open.
@torstenscholz62433 жыл бұрын
Well, in the 1970s, it was considered modern and innovative in terms of noise reduction and comfort, but in 1994 the construction was already 20 years old, so naturally there was more advanced competition and people felt different about noise.
@slowpoke31022 жыл бұрын
Obviously you never flew a dc-10. Try flying a 727 if you can find one. Sit in the rear next to the engine then sit on a DC-10 in the rear. Then see what noisy is. You'll need a firing range helmet in the back of the 727 or a L1011. Obviously you never flew any of those. Louder than STUFF ! Gee Lockheed is looking at borrowing (again) that rear engine mount in their swiped plans for the new sst. At least in the drawing of the prototype. Much quieter than the L1011.
@archangel66662 жыл бұрын
@@slowpoke3102 he never said he flew it….
@slowpoke31022 жыл бұрын
@@archangel6666 : More noise from the gotta pretend I know what I'm typing about gallery. SURE! 👣
@englishincontext4025 Жыл бұрын
In the early 1970's I worked as crew on 747s for British Airways. I never worked on the DC 10 but was aware of the crashes due to the cargo door. Friends of mine working the DC 10 route (London Heathrow to Los Angeles) called it the "Sorry Fleet" because they were constantly having to apologise to passengers for things on board which didn't work.
@TPTGopher11 ай бұрын
Definitely LAX - the "Imperial Highway" in the road sign connects greater LA to (east of San Diego) Imperial County, CA.
@SKIPWOOD-UA777CAPT11 ай бұрын
that is a maintenance function.... just like the AA crash in chicago... due to mechanics improperly changing engines without removing the bracket... to save time and toil
@KutalMeteTekin6 жыл бұрын
Quality of the mustard is off the charts! Love this channel
@timw69283 жыл бұрын
DC-10 you saved our country towns twice over here in AUS . A fire so huge and out of control the towns were deemed unsavable, watching you fly into gullies releasing your loads and climb up and out of places where I'd fear for small aircraft was just beyond belief. No matter what anyone else thinks, says or imagines your OK with me. Absolutely amazing aircraft.
@KB2HSH2 жыл бұрын
* you're
@jacenthegreat95362 жыл бұрын
@@KB2HSH it's been 9 months since he sent this bruh you're weird
@blakeveracruz1222 жыл бұрын
Your English is horribly bad. Just incoherent
@birdwithoutwings68582 жыл бұрын
@@jacenthegreat9536 the fact that your calling people out for replying late says a lot about how old you are mentally and it’s quite concerning I’d say…
@vk2ig2 жыл бұрын
@@jacenthegreat9536 There's no sin in being correct, regardless of time.
@speedbird2276 жыл бұрын
I didn't subscribe at first because I thought you were just another Vox clone with a team of writers and editors because of the production quality. After learning that you are, pretty much, just *you* I have to say holy shit.
@Unfamiliar_Fruit6 жыл бұрын
Maybe I'm missing something, but is there something fundamentally wrong with having a writing team and multiple editors?
@chromatron52306 жыл бұрын
@@Unfamiliar_Fruit it kinda takes away the touch you know , like a corporation and an independent man having comparable production quality is a big thing
@timcraig58656 жыл бұрын
plus what even is the name 'mustard'
@speedbird2276 жыл бұрын
Pretty up to par with other channels with the same sort of content, really.
@stephengaskin33866 жыл бұрын
he mañ
@cellokid51045 жыл бұрын
This is the most anti-clickbait title EVER
@K_okis4 жыл бұрын
@Gappie Al Kebabi + (NOT CLICKBAIT!!!!) JAKE PAUL DIED OMG!
@cellokid51044 жыл бұрын
@Gappie Al Kebabi yeah man
@owenklein19174 жыл бұрын
Gappie Al Kebabi [HOOD FIGHTS] (GONE SEXUAL)
@kauihana444 жыл бұрын
I read that in Sokkas voice because of your profile pic lol
@officialkirbyfan68994 жыл бұрын
HOW TO GET $1000000000000000 ON GTA5 ONLINE!!!!!!
@felixmarseille69056 жыл бұрын
You just keep getting better. Man! Keep it up
@mickeydee35952 жыл бұрын
My dad was a teenager living in Paris, France at the time when the Turkish airlines DC10 crashed. Him and his friends managed to get to the scene moments before the emergency services did.
@canerguener8664 Жыл бұрын
Thats a really sad but important story...
@half.blight Жыл бұрын
Your friends are very lucky
@Fercough8 ай бұрын
Thank you to your father and friends for their efforts. Thank you to the people of Senlis and the area. You were, and are, magnificent. Whenever we visit we are treated oh so well. People care, 50 years on the people still show care and love to the victims and their famailies. Thank you.
@JeffFromTheIRS6 жыл бұрын
I love the quality of these videos and i think it will always impress me
@tomcat23956 жыл бұрын
europe.au I agree they are great quality, love these videos
@uss_046 жыл бұрын
Look at that raytracing
@Peeeeweeeherman6 жыл бұрын
these videos just keep getting better even tho you wouldn't think they could. this is amazing. even the ad read was brilliant
@comradeyuri84925 жыл бұрын
In summer 1976 I flew in a United D-10. And let me tell you it had the fastest most powerful takeoff I have ever experienced in my life !
@sparrowlt5 жыл бұрын
maybe a short range route wich requires low fuel? all airliners are rockets when near empty of cargo and low fuel...
@dmeemd77875 жыл бұрын
With all the safety issues, I still would have loved to fly on one, I bet that takeoff was truly amazing for a jetliner!!
@sparrowlt5 жыл бұрын
@@dmeemd7787 yeah me too... while i usually bash the DC10 in favor of the L1011 ..i would had loved flying in a DC/MD at least one...
@dmeemd77875 жыл бұрын
@@sparrowlt oh absolutely!
@Dedicated2WendyWilliams5 жыл бұрын
it was probably windy that day, given you only flew it once in summer of 76'
@johnyrocketch3 жыл бұрын
That was one of the best sponsor clips ever. So smooth. I didn't skip through, I watched all if it.
@mariondiemert4304 жыл бұрын
For many years I flew as a flight attendant for Lufthansa. First B 747 and B 727, later DC 10 and B 737. Loved all the Boeing airplanes, hated the DC - Fix as we called it. Lufthansa had a few DC 10's that were front 2/3rds passenger and back 1/3 freight capacity. I loved working the back galley's and will never forget one take off from Frankfurt going to JFK. We had secured the back doors and attached the slides and I sat in my back jump seat for take off. Wanted to light my cigarette after the no smoking signs went off and my lighter didn't work. There was a strong breeze coming from the R4 door. It had opened about 20 cm and inching upward. I grabbed the phone and called the cock-pit crew. An absolute no-no during takeoff, but this was an emergency. Told the flight engineer that the R4 was open, he said, 'can't be, all doors show they are closed'. Told him I had a birds eye view of Kelsterbach and someone has to do something right away. The airplane leveled off some and I watched the flight engineer slowly make his way back to my part of the cabin, he looked around the corner of the container wall and went absolutely pale. Looked at me with the same horror I knew I had in my eyes and said, 'You have to help me close it'. I'm thinking, 'Hell no, no way in hell'. He inched his way to the door and I got up and came from the other side. Together we pulled the door down as hard as we could, and it locked back into place. He was shaking as much as I was, patted my cheek and went back into the cockpit. Needless to say, I went back to my old group upon arrival back in Frankfurt.
@jshepard152 Жыл бұрын
Good lord. And.... what a great story.
@Herowebcomics Жыл бұрын
Wow! When they messed up the the plane,they really went all out!
@andyc9902 Жыл бұрын
Can we be friends
@renes.2987 Жыл бұрын
Relevant parts of the story are missing! Did the lighter work afterwards?
@normie8895 Жыл бұрын
I flew in a DC 10 a few times and DC9 was unpleasant, both planes fly at an uphill angle and for some reason have poor circulation of air giving a sense of claustrophobia. On a return flight from holiday the DC9 was on the apron with a load of mechanics with torches!!! struggling to get one of the engines to run reliably, after watching futile efforts to mend the plane all of the passengers informed the desk they were not prepared to travel on this plane, so we had to wait for an alternative DC9.
@thesupertendent89736 жыл бұрын
*BANG* Captain: what was that?! Co-pilot: Must be the engine mounting, cargo doors, and passenger doors have come off sir Captain: damn, third time this week, got a smoke?
@mirzaahmed65896 жыл бұрын
You picked the wrong week to quit smoking.
@milanbogar99376 жыл бұрын
Swissair 111 intensifies.
@nomadnametab6 жыл бұрын
the DC-10 would have made a great kamikaze. only problem was it would probably be able to reach its target before the engines fell off.
@mikedargen53486 жыл бұрын
The engine issue had nothing to do with the design...IMPROPER MAINTENANCE!! Several airlines were FINED for this!!
@cubefish23206 жыл бұрын
Sounds about right
@mcdonnell2206 жыл бұрын
Great job Gabe, and thanks!
@APFS-DS6 жыл бұрын
Source?
@captrexyt20066 жыл бұрын
Phillip Habsburg How, may I ask, do you know about this? And how do we know it is true?
@captrexyt20066 жыл бұрын
Have I just been accused of molesting a small child?
@MustardChannel6 жыл бұрын
'tis a troll in our midst
@thinkaboutit47156 жыл бұрын
@@phillip_iv_planetking6354 Phillip Habsburg approves of Incest
@glukegames72983 жыл бұрын
This plane is the reason that the retirement of Concorde was confirmed so thanks DC-10
@cefb89233 жыл бұрын
Yeah the DC10 is the cause for sonic booms and jet fuel being expensive. People are dense.
@somethingelse92283 жыл бұрын
@@cefb8923 I hope that it was a joke, In reality, a part of one of the dc-10 fell off on the runway which later caused an explosion in a Concord which brought the entire flight down
@slowpoke31023 жыл бұрын
Hmm, next time tell the repair facility not to purchase 3rd rate non approved replacement parts. That's a design flaw eh genius? Fascism in control eh?
@Sirdiggar3 жыл бұрын
@@somethingelse9228 it wasn't just that though, a series of events lead to it. Pilot error, fuel overloaded capacity, too much cargo weight from customer baggage. It was an awful disaster.
@Sirdiggar3 жыл бұрын
@Rafael Enriquez Concorde was just too ahead of its time but not. Amazing engineering but it's another case of: look what we can make! Without thinking of the future and being to maintain and run it.
@crash1do5 жыл бұрын
DC-10 : i'm the deadliest jetliner B737 MAX 8 : Hold my beer!
@cyka40755 жыл бұрын
😞
@nalukias51135 жыл бұрын
Lol 😂😂😂
@52fadhilmaawi755 жыл бұрын
@hengky prayoga dude what the heck that aint dc-10 that is md-90
@LavenderLullabies5 жыл бұрын
cloridan Beauchamps But it’s not, because it’s also been in service for decades. The 737Max is nearly brand new and has had two complete loss crashes in a 5 month span, both with brand new planes. Crashes on the 747 weren’t all because of an inherent flaw in the aircraft’s design. The Max is linked to a flaw within the design of the plane itself.
@dmannevada59815 жыл бұрын
@@dodecahedron1 You mean the planes alive, and it was the plane itself who killed the people.
@kaiblue56605 жыл бұрын
I feel like history has repeated itself with the 737 and its rivalry with the airbus
@twany4425 жыл бұрын
It's extremely eerie how it's pretty much the same except for a few minor differences. The saying goes...what goes on in the dark eventually comes to light.
@kaiblue56605 жыл бұрын
Antoine Swans 👍🏻
@PabloGonzalez-hv3td5 жыл бұрын
Everyone blames the rivalry but the airlines themselves would have been pushing for a 737 NG replacement that did NOT require complete crew recertification the 737 is the world's most widely used airliner the cost would have been enormous. Boeing built the aircraft that was asked of them
@torstenscholz62433 жыл бұрын
Well, 20 years before the DC-10 there was the De Havilland Comet. Sadly much of aviation history is trial and error.
@gerardcollins802 жыл бұрын
History doesn't repeat but it certainly does rhyme.
@rubberwoody4 жыл бұрын
it's weird seeing ads for planes on TV like theyre cars or something instead of just seeing ads for airLINES
@djgatorshark90024 жыл бұрын
Airlines are barely profitable in good times, so you won't see any ads because the marketing budget is always cut first.
@nigelssurfshop3 жыл бұрын
I saw a commercial for the Northrop B-2 Stealth Bomber once, I could not afford it at the time
@AsbestosMuffins2 жыл бұрын
even in the early 2000s when I flew on one of these it still had a reputation. Today these things are the backbone of the air cargo industry
@johnleebass4 жыл бұрын
Retired AA F/A here... lost hydraulics, ability to lower flaps/brake but was still an awesome bird & loved the 2 elevators/lower galley (crew hideout)!
@jameslester4474 Жыл бұрын
No F/A that worked the DC-10 would call the " P&C " lift ...elevators...😁 " P " for Personal, and "C" for Cart... Worked on them for 8 months in my day.
@PistaKralovic5 жыл бұрын
I worked at the at the TV station for some years and not a single program had this level of graphics and storytelling in it. well done and very much appreciated 🙏
@Biggreengiant6 жыл бұрын
I've been hungry for a new Mustard video. Today is a good day. Also, I've seen a lot of Square Space ads, and that was by in large the best one.
@TheFirstWoffle3 жыл бұрын
That Delta L-1011 at 4:35 is probably laughing so hard
@kandllee34355 жыл бұрын
Concorde: amazing miracle plane with sst DC-10: I’m gonna ruin this man’s career
@eltontv60024 жыл бұрын
@John S a concorde crashed in 2000 because it run over a metal strip wich fell off of a dc10 directly starting before the concorde. causing the tire to explode and rupture one turbine.
@shapman2804 жыл бұрын
It's like saying your son killed your father but actually the person driving the son's car is a person you never met but you actually blamed it on the son because he owned the car lol
@TORchic14 жыл бұрын
It sucks that the Concorde basically died because of one accident that was a caused by a DC-10, not the Concorde itself.
@shapman2804 жыл бұрын
@@TORchic1 Concorde was dieing before this incident happened due to the environment hazards it has and the price of the fuel is pricey
@henrysgarage33994 жыл бұрын
@@shapman280 no it never caused problems to the environment
@paulpeterson82124 жыл бұрын
The story that I was told by an employee was that when servicing the wing engines the technicians did not follow the maintenance directions. They found a shortcut and instead of lowering the whole engine they only loosened one engine mount then lowered it low enough to do the maintenance required while the engine was partially supported be the mount that was still connected. The stress by doing this is it what damaged the disconnected mount that led to the mounting failure.
@JW-gu9vy2 жыл бұрын
They didnt follow the manufacturer's manual. They used AA manuals. Two technician's committed suicide. I know one of the other technicians personally. I have 35 yrs. with AA maintenance. This happened before my time, and its still very upsetting. RIP to all. Aircraft 110.
@machupikachu10852 жыл бұрын
@@JW-gu9vy wow. Didn't know that, thanks for mentioning it. Sad all the way around.
@vk2ig2 жыл бұрын
This is what happens when the manufacturer's procedures aren't followed or aren't incorporated into the airline's procedures. The Alaska Airlines ASA261 MD-83 crashed because people chose not to follow the "time-consuming" maintenance procedure for lubricating the horizontal stabiliser jackscrew.
@Ottopankok20136 жыл бұрын
I waited for this since the L1011 Video
@vibekestronstad78596 жыл бұрын
Me to
@MaxCheng956 жыл бұрын
Ditto
@laserbeam38364 жыл бұрын
Bittoo
@sandervanderkammen92302 жыл бұрын
You should see the boys at *10 Tanker* flying them as water bombers... incredible to watch just how rugged and agile these half century old widebody giants really are... truly brilliant engineering.
@Stereo3DProductions5 жыл бұрын
Alternative names for the DC10: Death Contraption 10, Death Cruiser 10, Daily Crash 10, Donald's Disaster, Crowd Killer
@kartikpeddinti4874 жыл бұрын
Underrated comment!
@AmyAnnLand4 жыл бұрын
While I don't necessarily agree, you forgot "Deadly Coffin", "Disastrous Calamity" and "Destructive Catastrophe".
@thomasdaniels68244 жыл бұрын
Dc10- 1200 deaths b737 5500 deaths
@howardlea36414 жыл бұрын
Death carriage 10. MD then followed up with mega death 11
@erojerisiz15714 жыл бұрын
Crowd killer, a title shared by the ford mustang
@milesmccue93884 жыл бұрын
Yea I’d say a giant hole in the side of the plane is “a basic fault in design” lmao
@FS-me8mj4 жыл бұрын
@Marechal Zolotoy yeah crashing is such an inconvenience
@Phonixrmf3 жыл бұрын
It's not a fault, it's a feature
@cacornett583 жыл бұрын
Just keep asking WHY, and you will find the real answer.
@twistedyogert3 жыл бұрын
It'll buff out.
@lolwhat363 жыл бұрын
maintenance faults and design flaws
@TehOldGamer6 жыл бұрын
At the time of the engine-mount failure my father worked for Western Airlines as a mechanic. They had DC-10s as part of the fleet and my father was trained to do all maintenance on them. The ultimate finding was that American was using forklifts and sledgehammers to mount engines, which caused the cracks and ultimately, the failure of the engine mounts. Western's DC-10s were grounded and checked for cracks along with all others. No problems were found in Western's fleet because they followed the manufacturer's recommendations.
@theenzoferrari4586 жыл бұрын
Shit. Throw in some duct tape and WD-40 and you'll have a nice Jerry rigged plane.
@5roundsrapid2636 жыл бұрын
Yep. Some lazy idiot killed hundreds and ruined a plane’s reputation because he wanted to save a couple hours.
@TehOldGamer6 жыл бұрын
@Dominique Hardie Thanks for that. He actually worked in Denver in 1981 so that is definitely true.
@Greatdome996 жыл бұрын
The aircraft should have been able to fly with one engine out (or in this case, off), but as the engine separated and rotated up and over the wing (still burning and thrusting residual fuel), it severed all three wing hydraulic systems mounted on the front spar of the wing, causing the wing flaps to retract on the one side, rendering the airplane uncontrollable. The same problem caused several other DC10 crashes, including Sioux City and in Paris, where the lounge piano got sucked thru the floor when the aft cargo hatch blew open. In both cases, all three hydraulic system lines were severed, rendering the airplane uncontrollable. Routing tubes is not rocket science, but it does take some though to their placement and proximity.
@j3fron6 жыл бұрын
What you said was true And already documented in nat geo air crash investigations Its horrible not to follow procedures just to save a couple hundred dollars and 2 hours time What are they thinking at that time? Messing around with passanger life
@gestaposantaclaus2 жыл бұрын
Now these things are literally saving communities from wildfires.
@hunterheath85884 жыл бұрын
DC 10 crashes multiple times MD 11 launches McDonald Douglas: the MD 11 once again sets the standard for air travel
@theglitch3124 жыл бұрын
Hunter Heath, except the MD-11 was actually a great plane right from the start.
@AmyAnnLand4 жыл бұрын
@@theglitch312 Not to mention they're still flying to this day albeit mostly cargo versions, but they are great for even being 20-30 years old.
@matthewq4b4 жыл бұрын
@@theglitch312 WTF are you smoking? it has a worse track record than the DC-10
@eval_is_evil3 жыл бұрын
That made me laugh, good one mate 🤣
@singleproppilot3 жыл бұрын
The MD-11 has a great cockpit that was extremely advanced for its time. But everything behind the cockpit door is recycled DC-10 garbage, just made bigger. McDonnell Douglas built them strong, not smart. Signed: An MD-11 mechanic now and probably for many years to come.
@liamw65624 жыл бұрын
“Dc 10 more like DC death!” Actual quote by Freddie Mercury
@slowpoke31024 жыл бұрын
747's 26 fatal crash, DC-10 15 fatal crash, L-1011 5 fatal crash Death whom? Many more have died on 747's L-1011's were the best wide body. DC-10 only 2nd best.
@adamp.37394 жыл бұрын
@@slowpoke3102 Well, what you need to consider is that as of now, despite the DC-10 selling almost double the L-1011, it's got triple the crashes. So it's not a completely unfounded statement. And besides, 26 fatal crashes for over 1500 aircraft isn't shoddy for the 747...
@milebackwards4 жыл бұрын
Designed to Crash -10
@slowpoke31024 жыл бұрын
@@adamp.3739 :? ? ? You Know what? huh? On the record from FAA 2 crashes due to design flaws, Boink, 747 & 737, many more each per model, and tons of good press? Sounds political, not factual. Boink & LM have many complaints of kickbacks also. We could go back to the C-5A the original wide body. So many design flaws Douglas helped Lockheed (at the time) redesign the bad portions to stop military from dropping the project. Look at the Thank You LM gave MD back. Both LM & Boink known for low friends in high places. Could talk about this subject for hours, but. . . Look up the founder of Douglas which came later in the existence of the multinational corps. See where all the branches of the company went after the forced break up.
@vancey76044 жыл бұрын
That guy was a queen
@dx14504 жыл бұрын
My first transoceanic flight was on a DC-10 back in 1989. When I found out what kind of aircraft we were going to be flying on, I was a bit nervous even though there hadn't been any recent DC-10 mishaps.
@vk2ig2 жыл бұрын
My first trans-Atlantic (but not trans-oceanic) flight was on a DC-10. I was a bit nervous about boarding it as it was clearly an old aircraft - it had that "cattle truck" smell that older passenger / freight aircraft get.
@blank_3768 Жыл бұрын
@@vk2ighow do you cross the Atlantic without crossing an ocean? did the Atlantic get a downgrade when i wasn’t watching?
@MartinFarrell19723 жыл бұрын
My first ever flight was on a DC10 from Scotland to USA in 1989. Loved the interior of the plane. At that time I hadn't heard of DC10
@jradish6 жыл бұрын
I'm a simple man. I see a mustard video, I hit like.
@cyclops866 жыл бұрын
+10000. Damnit, I was thinking the exact same line!
@Platyfurmany6 жыл бұрын
I agree... it's an automatic response because of the high quality content.
@jradish6 жыл бұрын
James Smith cool plane, I love it. I've always loved the DC-10, and I live under the approach path of an airport and I see DC-10s and MD-11s every other day. I think they're gorgeous and badass, but they have a terrible reputation. I agree with pretty much everything said in the video.
@jradish6 жыл бұрын
@James Smith what
@indonesia_playa6 жыл бұрын
Jarod Kelly oh i thought you gonna put it on your hotdog instead you watching it great jarod now go to mental hospital right now honey!!!
@madam7576 жыл бұрын
Mustard > Everything else in the world
@Crankiebox996 жыл бұрын
C4 > Mustard
@Windows11Official6 жыл бұрын
Wendover = Mustard
@ikman5 жыл бұрын
It's still the best looking widebody aircraft ever build. Loved the time working on them.
@V0YAG3R5 жыл бұрын
ikman nope 🖕🏻
@ikman5 жыл бұрын
@@V0YAG3R haha😎
@comedebreuille53965 жыл бұрын
Tristar was far more beautiful !
@outdoorfrenzy5 жыл бұрын
Worked on the KC-10 myself and we never had a problem with them. Great planes and a solid USAF work horse!!
@MAGGOT_VOMIT4 жыл бұрын
@@outdoorfrenzy _I joked for years that some retard in Washington D.C. designated the "K" for "Kargo" xD_
@LeoAbukar3 жыл бұрын
“The Dc-10 earned a dangerous reputation”. But earn my respect for fighting in the skies against wildfires.
@manbok20355 жыл бұрын
DC10: I really wasn't safe... 737 max: A safety measure made me unsafe...
@Milesco5 жыл бұрын
Ironic, isn't it?
@pigmasteradam24895 жыл бұрын
Actually the other way around. The DC-10 accidents were due to improper maintenance, 737 Max due to not being safe.
@Milesco5 жыл бұрын
@@pigmasteradam2489 : Well, the 1979 American Airlines Flight 191 crash was indeed due to improper maintenance procedures, but on American Airlines Flight 96 (1972) and Turkish Airlines Flight 981 (1974), the cargo door blew open due to faulty design of the latch mechanism. And as a result of poor design of the fuselage, the explosive decompression resulting from the cargo door flying open caused the floor of the passenger compartment to collapse, severing or jamming the control cables than ran underneath the floor, causing a loss of control of the airplane. Flight 96 landed safely in Detroit, but Flight 981 did not, crashing in a forest near Paris, killing all 346 on board. Then there was United Airlines Flight 232 which crashed at Sioux City, Iowa in 1989. An explosive disintegration of the second engine's fan disk ruptured all three hydraulic systems, leading to a loss of control of the aircraft.
@GiordanDiodato5 жыл бұрын
@@Milesco after 191, the DC-10 had very few major accidents.
@Milesco5 жыл бұрын
@@GiordanDiodato : Well, that Sioux City crash in '89 was pretty major.
@redfire281GT5 жыл бұрын
Here for the Boeing 737 MAX comments and i was not disappointed
@grandestcherokee5 жыл бұрын
The 737 Max 8 has crashed twice as the DC-10 has had 55 Accidents and Incidents, 32 Hull-Loss accidents with 1,261 fatalities, 9 Hijackings and a Bombing with a loss of 170. How dangerous is the 737 Max Again?
@ShadowRaptor425 жыл бұрын
Same
@berndarndt99245 жыл бұрын
@@grandestcherokee did you really included hijacks and bombings on your list?
@grandestcherokee5 жыл бұрын
Yes, because the 737 MAX had none, showing that it hasn’t had the scrutiny of The DC-10.
@jamesk44605 жыл бұрын
@@grandestcherokee How many years DC 10 fly and how many months 737 max fly , then imagine if 737 max has the same fly years as DC 10
@alisaiem59416 жыл бұрын
Quality 》 Quantity I Like It!
@toro64xxx6 жыл бұрын
I BET YOU DO.
@Dan-or8ld5 жыл бұрын
Ali Saiem I like it both ways
@noriceformeplz10 ай бұрын
Looks like MD reputation is making its way into Boeing with all the problems the 737 MAX is having.
@Ticklestein5 жыл бұрын
Can't wait for the Boeing 737 Max 8 version.
@inevervotesoitisnotmyfault69205 жыл бұрын
Me too! Gonna love the Max! (😎😎)
@MAGGOT_VOMIT4 жыл бұрын
_Auto-Pilot by Elon Musk._
@jeffiles79534 жыл бұрын
The DC10 was the first plane I ever flew on as a 16 year old and I was blown away by how big and wide it was.
@thomasaquinas26003 жыл бұрын
The funny thing is, I flew on the DC10, as well as the L1011, by Douglas and Lockheed resp. They were the two best flights I'd ever had with stability like a ship on a calm sea. Now they're both gone. The DC10 was done in by the superior market power of Boeing and the failure to ensure the ground maintenance of the crucial engine pods, which resulted in many problems thereafter...
@sp00tnik264 жыл бұрын
DC10: *Sniff* Im a failure!!! MD11: Sssh Don't worry im sure you'll find a better job DC10: R-really? *DC10 Later became cargo jet and then lived a great life.
@Joshua-yf5mh3 жыл бұрын
Found a good job as an aerial tanker, KC-10s are great.
@dihydrogenmonoxide92103 жыл бұрын
fedex also uses them as freighters
@ruifong5 жыл бұрын
Before: DC-10 is dangerous aircraft Now: B737 MAX 8 is new dangerous aircraft
@chelsc77345 жыл бұрын
And you know what's ironic, the company responsible for DC10 was merged with Boeing . There seems to be a pattern here.
@TheHabsGuy5 жыл бұрын
I literally flew on the MAX 8 last Saturday. A day before the second horrific crash.
@Roy522025 жыл бұрын
The new and modern death cruiser
@evs2515 жыл бұрын
Yeah I won't trust any american plane manufacturer from now on
@LogieT2K5 жыл бұрын
i think they are saying that its likely a auto pilot error causing the aircraft to stall without warning
@uss_046 жыл бұрын
Trijets, I still remember seeing them growing up. Now that I'm old enough to understand them, they still fascinate me. That and APUs. Trijets are one of those designs you cant help but stare at.
@97I30T6 жыл бұрын
I distinctly remember a KLM MD-11 rolling into San Francisco one time and just about everyone who saw it whipped their phones out and started taking pictures of it. I've never seen that happen with any other plane.
@davidhildebrand88946 жыл бұрын
I grew up on the B727s. Those were my favorites! Miss flying on them :(
@RJasonKlein Жыл бұрын
Great video, but I can’t believe you glossed over the most incredible of all DC-10 incidents, which was the one in Sioux City, IA.
@Fercough8 ай бұрын
Can you clarify this for me please?
@RJasonKlein8 ай бұрын
@@FercoughIn July of 1989 a DC-10 departing Denver to Chicago experienced a catastrophic turbine failure that sent shards of the fan ripping through the empennage , severing several hydraulic lines and rendering control of the airplane almost impossible. Despite having effectively no elevator or aileron, the pilots masterfully got the plane lined up for an approach to Sioux City, mostly using throttle and differential thrust to finesse the plane to airstrip. Miraculously, the aircraft made the field, but crashed on the runway breaking apart and catching fire. Thanks to remarkable pilot skill, most of the passengers survived - although many did perish. It ranks up there with Sully’s Miracle on the Hudson as one of aviation’s most incredible stories, and despite numerous attempts after the fact, simulator pilots could never successfully replicate what those skilled pilots did that day.
@stevekohl535111 күн бұрын
@RJasonKlein I live in Sioux City and know some of the people living here who helped with rescue after the crash. I will never forget looking out of my office window and watching ambulances leaving the trauma hospital up the street, driving by, turning the corner, and heading back to the airport to pick up another injured passenger. A defective fan blade in the center engine shattered and caused that engine to fail. But pieces of the fan blade severed all 3 hydraulic lines located near each other in the back of the plane causing loss of all hydraulics.
@andrei192386 жыл бұрын
How is these videos so high quality wow
@RapperBC6 жыл бұрын
I'll never forget after the Potomac River crash in DC, watching the television show "That's Incredible". One of the hosts asked a man in the audience, "What's the last place you'd want to be right now?" "On a DC-10", said the guy, smiling, without even blinking. Everybody got it. The audience cascaded into laughter. I was seven years old, and *I* got it.
@erich80826 жыл бұрын
That was a boeing 737 not a dc 10 that crashed in the Potomac
@barrierodliffe41556 жыл бұрын
At least some got off the 737, unlike DC 10's when so often so many did not get off.
@erich80826 жыл бұрын
@@barrierodliffe4155 the only deadly crash that was attributed to the dc 10s design was turkish air 981, the rest werent the planes fault.
@barrierodliffe41556 жыл бұрын
Not the planes fault that it crashed after an engine failed or when an engine fell off, that is a stretch. The bad design of the cargo door that failed at least 3 times and just luck that no one was killed apart from the Turkish airlines crash. The badly designed hydraulics that failed causing the fatal crash when the engine fell off and the crash at Sioux City when the rear engine failed.
@erich80826 жыл бұрын
@@barrierodliffe4155 the aa 191 crash where the engine fell off was faulty maintenance, the maintenance crew took a short cut putting the engine back on. Not the planes fault, the sioux city disaster was an engine malfunction, not the planes fault.
@Loquatio4 жыл бұрын
We gonna talk about how amazing the segue into the sponsor was? This man's creativity 👌🏻
@nooberto13983 жыл бұрын
airplanes with tail engines made me obsessed with them, they just look so cool
@coconutdreams12383 жыл бұрын
Exactly! Such a shame that they don't fly anymore
@janetcsg4 ай бұрын
They do, but mainly for cargo
@maxpower197116 жыл бұрын
DC-10= Death Cruiser 10
@notsocooldude77205 жыл бұрын
Quinn Von Kerman Death Chamber 10*
@explodingonc27825 жыл бұрын
Daily Crash - 10
@helium-3795 жыл бұрын
What happened to the other 9?
@SNPGandalf5 жыл бұрын
Death-Contraption 10
@ruifong5 жыл бұрын
Death Crash 10
@smoothsoil26006 жыл бұрын
Always excited to see a new mustard video
@EpicAwesomesauce6 жыл бұрын
I was just about to get into a game, but I left the queue as soon as my eye caught the wonderful Mustard livery on this plane in the thumbnail
@tirebiter1680 Жыл бұрын
Problem #1 was the DC 10 Went on the market at about the same time as the 747 AND the Lockeed L-1011 the L1011 was the most advanced airliner ever built.
@bobneyland57723 жыл бұрын
My father flew the DC-10. He never had a problem with it. He loved it. He also flew the 747.
@nigelssurfshop3 жыл бұрын
I'm very proud of him, what airline? I might know him
@sadsworth46053 жыл бұрын
He "HAD" flew it 😔
@birdwithoutwings68582 жыл бұрын
@@sadsworth4605 then it’s probably passenger DC-10 as they were retired nearly a decade ago
@abc-bu8zb2 жыл бұрын
He was never seen again
@gabrielle-AV-n-PFloyd2 жыл бұрын
My dad did too! He was a pilot for UAL 60's-90's, in fact he said the DC-10 was his favorite airplane to fly in all his years.
@SpartanDara6 жыл бұрын
I am so glad to have discovered this channel, the production quality and content is *unreal*. Keep it up!
@gerundioreoyo72823 жыл бұрын
I flew DC10 and MD11s for 35 years. Loved the aircraft.
@slowpoke31022 жыл бұрын
Thank You!
@barrierodliffe41552 жыл бұрын
Worst aircraft I ever flew on and once was too many times.
@andrewukadike3433 Жыл бұрын
My dad used to tell me about these planes. He told me he would absolutely refuse to get on one. In my local airport there used to be a bunch of abandoned ones all over the place just left to rot until they were dismantled a couple years ago
@winternow2242 Жыл бұрын
Unsurprising as the last passenger dc10s were retired years ago, and the manufacturer was acquired by Boeing in 1997. Also, 3 engine aircraft have been out of service for years, including the the 727, and the DC-10's competitor, the L1011.
@finn-hz9nu5 жыл бұрын
DC-10: I’m so dangerous 737 MAX8: Hold my mcas files
@indiana1464 жыл бұрын
Very gòod scary bit they knew about faults did nothing I worked at bae systems we also built airbus wings some of the stuff that went on was ludicrus
@sandervanderkammen92304 жыл бұрын
DH 106 Comet: raining down in little bits
@treysavage92624 жыл бұрын
Bruh u know how many people the DC-10 killed compared to the 737 max? U sound dumb
@isak83864 жыл бұрын
The DC-10 killed a lot mor people than the 737 max 8
@JETZcorp4 жыл бұрын
@@isak8386 The DC-10 was also in service much longer, and was a bigger airplane carrying more people.
@OdahAren6 жыл бұрын
Your videos get better and better. It's outstanding just how good they are becoming, congratulations. The ad of Squarespace there damn, very creative, very well done, by far the best one I've seen so far!
@MrJeffcoley14 жыл бұрын
I was only a child, but I remember the fear surrounding the DC-10. It was widely considered a death trap at the height of the hysteria.
@Mclain112 жыл бұрын
Love the md 11 would fly on one in a heartbeat, also you can always identify a md 11 with it’s signature look
@sporkeh906 жыл бұрын
Its turbofan not fanjet. The Tri jets were made because you were not allowed to cross the Atlantic with just 2 engines for safety reasons. This changed in the late 80's, which is the reason we dont see them anymore.
@Bartonovich526 жыл бұрын
Fan jet is what they called them at the time.
@hydrochloricacid21466 жыл бұрын
They are synonymous with each other. Also, these tri-jets didn't exist simply because of regulations. Even ignoring the 60 minute rule, there wasn't an engine in the world powerful enough to accommodate a twin jet plane the size of the dc10 or l1011 back when tri-jets were a thing. Airbus themselves had trouble finding engines that were powerful enough for the smaller a300
@karenkelly-dillenbeck92096 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@barrierodliffe41555 жыл бұрын
@@hydrochloricacid2146 The A 300 was a bit smaller and lighter but a hell of a lot better.
@hydrochloricacid21465 жыл бұрын
@@barrierodliffe4155 never said the a300 was a bad plane
@saltyroe31794 жыл бұрын
Part of the story from reading Aviation Week and Space Destruction and being a Douglas Share Holder since 1966: There was only enough market for one medium wide body. Lockheed started 1st with a superior design. Douglas decided to win even though the started design 2nd. To win they had to come to market 1st, have lower unit cost, lower operating cost. The result had one obvious look: the middle engine of the L1011 was in line with the fuselage with an complex S duct, much like a 727. This meant better flight dynamics but also meant it was much more difficult to pull the middle engine. The DC10 middle engine was stuck on top of the fuselage. Cheaper and faster to design, cheaper to design and horrible flight dynamics. The L1011 was a joy to fly on. The DC10 was a joy for my stock portfolio. The Turkish Airlines crash was because the cargo door could be closed and not latched and the pilot couldn't tell. The door burst open the floor fell into the cargo bay cutting the control lines. The Chicago engine fly away is because American's chief mechanic realized if he bought a stanchion for each wing nestle there was big bolt to take it off at the wing. This reduced the time to remove and attach engines saving time and putting planes back in service faster. But that bolt was not designed to be repetitively removed and reapplied. The American mechanics used impact wrenches and did not observe Douglas's torque limits. This caused metal fatigue and the engine tore off the wing. The chief mechanic (who was one of the best in the business) stepped in front of a moving bus in a probable suicide. The DC10 was safe as long as Douglas's instructions were followed. Lockheed went bankrupt and was bailed out to finish the Big Bird spy satellite. McDonald Douglas limped along on military contracts (even sold tanker versions of the DC10 to USAF). Boeing bought it and I still have the stock. My favorite part is getting the annual report. Apparently Boeing got the short cut infection from Douglas and the new chapter is the cheap, fast to market 737 version instead of a properly designed replacement (or they could have made the landing hear taller). The virus might bankrupt Boeing
@barrierodliffe41552 жыл бұрын
Thefaulty cargo door was known about and McDonnel Douglas were warned what would happen in 1969, they ignored it, then in 1972 when it did happen McDonnel Douglas made a half hearted modification which didn't work, it goes back to Douglas cost cutting, a known fault on the DC 6 was ignored and covered up by Douglas until a bad crash and too many people died, then a modification to the DC 8 created a failure that again was known about but covered up by Douglas until more people died. Boeing are now doing the same, the 787 which so far has by luck not killed people and the 737 MAX which has, both have been grounded but both still have faults.
@Jakerjakejake5 жыл бұрын
Transition into squarespace ad tho! So smooth!
@Dedicated2WendyWilliams5 жыл бұрын
LOL i was thinking the same dang thing!!!
@simonm14479 ай бұрын
Today it has got a worthy successor with the 737 Max, which even loses doors during flight like once the DC-10