NASA vs Flat Earth Legend!

[@SciManDan]

Don't forget, The SciManDan Podcast starts later this month. Just search for The SciManDan Podcast in iTunes!

[@xXr4wrzXx0]

I cant wait!!!

[@Rurpled]

Is it on spotify also?

[@SciManDan]

It will be yes

[@Rurpled]

@@SciManDan Ah yer some man for one man, keep up the good work, buddy.

[@Italian_Isaac_Clarke]

Can we get the track guy's video?

[@nevarran]

The Flat Earth is not a geological question, it's one about mental health.

[@AutisticArcher]

Indeed: Schizotypical disorder. Look it up

[@HEWfunkingKNEWit]

100% and some seem too far gone to even bother arguing.

[@jordirobinson9899]

This might be my favourite comment on flat earth to date!

[@Gfish17]

@Pieter Von Soutbek You might as well enjoy the Laugh. Flat earthers don't deserve Dignity.

[@davekat]

This guy gets it. Many "famous" flatards are just plain mentally ill, and the rest are both stupid AND crazy

[@virtualbeast1228]

Flat earthers: You can't trust pictures Their next piece of evidence: Pictures

[@Hunt8rJob]

I know, its so exhausting.

[@hawk120]

lol. Boom!

[@icedriver2207]

@Shawnaldo75 Yeah stop posting your photshopped picture when clearly there is a crayon drawing available that is proof.

[@allanrojas9226]

www.mlive.com/news/muskegon/2012/05/the_lights_of_milwaukee_seen_t.html so where the curve at sir over 80miles I should not see Wisconsin yet we can on certain days. And it not a mirage you can clearly see the land. And mirage can never be replicated.

[@billthebutcher1821]

Great point 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

[@scottgibson6735]

I have been a sailor basically my whole life.I have seen enough shores,and ships disappear over the horizon to know for an absolute fact,that we live on a globe. Thank you for the video

[@cardinalRG]

Well said. As a pilot, I can relate.

[@BlackGuardXIII]

As just a guy standing on the shore with binoculars, I concur.

[@joerichardson4325]

US Navy Sailor here ('85 - '89). Avionics Tech on S-3 Vikings aboard the USS Nimitz and then the USS Theodore Roosevelt. Traveled well over half the oceans. Above Arctic Circle, across equator, around the Horn, Med, Pacific. Visuals confirm the globe. Aurora Borealis is awesome too! Coriolis effect as well. Crows nest, Vultures Row, radar locations, etc, etc. Fair winds...

[@DonWinslow-cn7zx]

​​@@joerichardson4325 I'm a U.S. Navy veteran, as well. I took a tour on the Roosevelt when it was anchored, off the coast of Antalya, Turkey in 1989. Like the Roosevelt, my ship, the U.S.S. William V. Pratt (DDG-44) was in the Sixth Fleet. That ship was huge. I wish I didn't drop my camera on the steel deck. It was my last roll of film, and it got exposed by the sun. Flat Earthers will never get it. They're caught up in their delusional thinking.

[@joerichardson4325]

@@DonWinslow-cn7zx Hey Brother! I got out after my last NATO type (2 mos) cruise to Wilhelmshaven, W Germany just before my squadron (VS-24) left on the Roosevelt for that Med Cruise. Went to Antalya on Nimitz in '87. Hate to hear about that exposed film, I always used those cheapo disposable ones. And now...Following Seas to you! 😁✌️🌎⚓

[@robindegetaire4388]

I am a seaman who sails around the world for 20 plus years. Sometimes, for weeks without ever seeing a piece of land... The objects disappearing over the horizon is absolutely true, and it is absolutely impossible to zoom in and bring them back fully.... LOL

[@AlienEntity1]

I like to challenge Flat Earthers to go to a beach where they can watch the sunset, wait for sunset until the sun has completely gone over the horizon, then use ANY telescope or zoom lens to 'bring it back' over the horizon... They never respond, nor do they try to confirm this. They just repeat what they've been told on youtube or TikTok videos.

[@3characterhandlerequired]

In a small boat you don't even have to go very far before land disappears over the horizon, as long as it is relatively flat and not some mountain range. Anyone that has been in a sea knows this.

[@Zahaqiel]

> Claims witness testimony is "hearsay appeal to authority" and "sophistry". > Immediately makes hearsay accusations about their secret society associations, as though random accusations and implied conspiracy isn't itself sophistry and an implied appeal to his own authority. Consistency!

[@Captain_Pudding]

Being too stupid to realize you've debunked your own argument counts as consistency among flat earthers

[@jerenoize]

The same arguments always come out over and over again. It's a sadness. Poor Eric !

[@Zahaqiel]

@@jerenoize Let's be real - if becoming a Freemason got you fast-tracked to the astronaut biz... there'd be a hell of a lot more Freemasons.

[@misterocain]

What would a Flerf be without being a purveyor of double standards?

[@johncatty6560]

@@Captain_Pudding Thanks, Bob! xD

[@rose_no]

"The pictures of the round earth are fake" ...but why aren't there *any* pictures of a flat earth?

[@a..d5518]

or even a map/model they can all agree on, well an accurate map/model that is accurate in any real sense.

[@doubletapthatdotty4597]

@@a..d5518 Don't forget that they use different models to prove different scenarios. Not one but 3 or 4 🤣

[@a..d5518]

@@doubletapthatdotty4597 I know, and they always dodge the question: "(enter name of your favorite FEr here) explain why you can't proof your FE claims with/one model, why do you need so many?"

[@mysticnomad3577]

They are all pictures of the flat earth. We just can't get high enough to get it in one shot. You are mistaken if you believe we can go to space.

[@dflo4165]

@@mysticnomad3577 Why can’t we get pictures of the bottom of the plate. Because there is no bottom.

[@watchesfromedges]

Best laugh I've had all week. She's explaining the shape of the earth to children and he's trying to challenge her because it's too advanced for him to understand.

[@beckydoesit9331]

Sci Man Dan purposefully left out the part Dubay brought up about Sigma Octantis point that ties all the southern continents together. I would say this is the biggest and most phenomenal flat Earth proof there is, yet he edits it out. How is it that all southern continents look toward the South Pole star, Sigma Octantis if they're looking in different directions? Globbers have no answer for this, but flats do. Which team are you on?

[@watchesfromedges]

@@beckydoesit9331 Not yours, dear.

[@user-iq7mk3gb9w]

@@beckydoesit9331 I dont understand. You just have a proof, and it is incorrect, and you consider your theory to be more correct than millions of proof that disprove you ?

[@beckydoesit9331]

@@user-iq7mk3gb9w Uh... no. It is not incorrect. If you go south of the equator and look to South America you're starring directly at the Sigma Octantis. And if you go to Australia and look directly south, you're starring, again at Sigma Octantis. And if you go to South Africa... you get the idea. How does this work? If you look at the flat Earth map these places are 180 degrees apart from one another, so how?

[@mullygully1510]

@@beckydoesit9331 just stop Becky, geez. You sound dumb.

[@Acehamster]

“Heliocentrist astronomers” like there’s any other type. 😆

[@robertcampbell6349]

Flat Earth Asstromomers? Misspelling is deliberate.

[@billsmith5960]

I'm a Delta Quadrant Astronomer.

[@robertcampbell6349]

@@billsmith5960 Can you post some pics of the Borg homeworld?

[@billsmith5960]

@@robertcampbell6349 _ Would but all other astronomers claim it's "CGI".

[@billsmith5960]

@Jim Jones - 7 of 9 is 6 of one half dozen of another. All I do is watch what is on TV today and now make fun of it. It's so easy to do. I like to see how they had to guess at what future technology was supposed to be and sometimes they really got it wrong when it just comes to basic stuff. Then it seems they forgot about ergonomics. The flashlights they use have got to be the worst design ever. Same for their luggage. Some 6 sided container that's about 2 ft long with a strap on it. I guess they gave up on roll around luggage. Best thing is, I watch just to find this prop which has been used in lots of movies and Star Trek Episodes. kzbin.info/www/bejne/l6LEY4aKf72pjqc It's the first one on this list: www.ex-astris-scientia.org/inconsistencies/modern_props_consoles.htm

[@stanrogers5613]

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

[@beckydoesit9331]

Sci Man Dan purposefully left out the part Dubay brought up about Sigma Octantis point that ties all the southern continents together. I would say this is the biggest and most phenomenal flat Earth proof there is, yet he edits it out. How is it that all southern continents look toward the South Pole star, Sigma Octantis if they're looking in different directions? Globbers have no answer for this, but flats do. Which team are you on?

[@RaawHax]

@@beckydoesit9331 What do you mean when you say: "All southern continents 'look toward' the South Pole star Sigma Octantis." and " 'Looking' in different directions"? But neither of those points should really matter. If Polaris Australis (Sigma Octantis) and Polaris exist, and the Earth is flat, both should be visible from anywhere on the surface of Earth simultaneously, but they aren't. That's because the curvature of Earth obscures them, since they are supposed to be the closest star to their respective poles. So at the southern pole, Polaris would be around the opposite side of the Earth to your location, and vice versa for Polaris Australis. Maybe if you were at very high elevation somewhere around the equator you MIGHT be able to see both, but not sure about that, since I'm no expert. But hey, you could go to the north pole and find both of those stars in the sky at the same time, seems like that would be irrefutable proof of a flat Earth!

[@masisf]

Yup. It’s big facts, not a theory, water and other liquids always seek its own level and remains there. It’s an unscientific, unproven scientific theory to claim water can cling to a shape and bend all around. Majority of earth is made up of such level water, making it an unscientific and unproven theory to claim earth is gigantic testicle, or spinning ball floating around in space like some sort of fantasy land

[@physetermacrocephalus9986]

@@masisf and why do you think water “seeks its own level”?

[@andysmith5464]

A great quote that Ricky Gervais himself used during live stand up.

[@rafetizer]

"We have pictures taken from space" is not an appeal to authority. It is a citation of evidence.

[@guytheincognito4186]

To the butthurt flerfs like Dubai the senseless it is. "All iMagEs comes from NAsaA.." BS as usual. Lmao.

[@lamontcranston8181]

@Esquilax you’ve probably seen them already. You just reject them for whatever reason that makes sense to you this week.

[@Slum0vsky]

@Esquilax If you want to see something you can't call CGI hit Museum of Cosmonautics in Moscow, Russia, they still have the ones they shot from their first space flights, before computers could even do basic graphics. Then explain me why they were cahoots with NASA.

[@39zack]

@@guytheincognito4186 and it's CEE..GEEE...👀 🤣🤣

[@Captain_Pudding]

@Esquilax here you go, enjoy eol.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/ShowQueryResults-CoolIris.pl?results=EarthDisc

[@AS-fu1kd]

I love how they say scientists are "preaching" when they sit there and talk about unobserved nonsense

[@jerelull9629]

Belief in religion comes without evidence and *despite* all evidence to the contrary. In science, evidence contrary to your *understanding* requires you to adjust your understanding to account for the EVIDENCE.

[@1972malberto]

If you blasted this guy into space and showed him from the window, he'd say it was a simulation you can't win with a mindset like his one.

[@mysticnomad3577]

Not even astronauts are dumb enough to get in a rocket.

[@mysticnomad3577]

@@darrylrevok9936 are you that stupid? We ask that you trust your senses. Know the difference between trusting what you see on television and what you can see in reality. It really is like spoon-feeding children when it comes to this topic with you guys.

[@carlsapartments8931]

@@darrylrevok9936 Hey Darrel, looks like Bill is about blow a gasket, clearly has fallen down the rabbit hole, poor guy!

[@48917032]

Fortunately, you then have an airlock to take care of THAT problem.

[@mysticnomad3577]

@Hey Girl I Like Your Kitchen Romania forever quit crying and face the facts. The earth is flat and stationary. Dum dums like you have no clue what the scientific method is and how it shows how naive and ignorant you are.

[@SystematikSoundz]

It’s the sheer arrogance of the FEs that gets me every time. Like, literally there are no proofs whatsoever that they could be shown that would ever change their minds 🙄 Mind-boggling...

[@Mike-me3sp]

Most of them are frauds (Eric Dubay is, obviously). Financial gain or trolling just for sport. Of course you're not going to 'change their minds'.

[@aryanayush136]

They gain money by selling books

[@Stoneman06660]

Shame we can't launch one into space, get them reporting back live, then tell them that their trajectory will have them leaving Earth orbit. Oh, and there's no fuel left. Enjoy the trip.

[@Captain_Pudding]

Blind faith is funny that way

[@Katarn84]

Can’t change what is obliously not there, a mind.

[@Big_E_Soul_Fragment]

Flat Earth proofs: *Gets debunked* Flat Earthers: I'll pretend I didn't see that. *[uses the same debunked proof in arguments]*

[@39zack]

"I was not prepared for that "

[@juidude634]

Yeah. Allways saying the same arguments🤯 Its geding old.. ✌️🇫🇮

[@romithromith]

@@juidude634 You notice that too.

[@cynaptyc]

That's been his MO his whole flat life! ;)

[@lidbass]

Actually it’s more like: Flerfer: Here’s my proof! Glober : That’s not true for all these reasons. Flerfer: You’re oppressing my right to believe what I want! Plus you’re a NASA shill! And now I’ll repeat what I just said to annoy you!

[@RaymondBurgos]

I love that he says that she’s condescending while he only spews condescension 🤣

[@beckydoesit9331]

I love the resistance I get from my nose hairs as I pull boogers away using the backside of my thumb to dislodge them. I love looking at them too, and then I wipe them on my couch cushion never to be seen again. I do love it too when I don't successfully wipe it off and still feel it on my finger. t's like my favorite thing.

[@Terroid]

@@beckydoesit9331 what.

[@danteanise3013]

@@beckydoesit9331 Fascinating.

[@danteanise3013]

Raymond, I was thinking the very same thing. 😁 👍

[@aaronburtram3175]

@@danteanise3013 live it when he zooms heavily in on the boat in the far distance moving across the water parallel to the shore, but you don't see the wake that the boat must be making. Ignore the details, and call everyone else liars is his game.

[@lhvinny]

2:37 Eric's caption says, "if you can't figure out that someone is lying to you...I'm not sure I can help you." Eric, we did figure out that someone is lying to us: you are. And you certainly cannot help us.

[@lhvinny]

@Jiffy Considering how prominent Eric is in the flat earth community, I find it very unlikely that he is not well aware at this point that he spread misinformation in the past. Continuing to repeat that misinformation after being corrected puts him in the category of liars in my book.

[@SpikeMoby]

The only laughing stock is Dubay.

[@juhaeske]

Eric just keeps zooming.. . I can't listen his voice. Makes me vomit.

[@moon_wobble7782]

no, there's sleeping warrior as well.

[@kefhomepage]

But they are only in it for the money. Less flat Earther more conman

[@MCMaterac]

Yup. I wonder have he realized he debunks himself: 7:11 vs. 8:11. I think he's a weasel. Funny how different flerfs contradict themselves, yet they don't care. Same stuff though with people against EBM (Evidence-based medicine) as e.g. Acupuncture's claims are incopatible with Homeopathy or Chiropractic (as JamesRandiFoundation lecture series show - R.I.P Randi!). Cringe.

[@Raxilla]

I genuinely believe people like Eric, Mark, Darryle and Nathan don't truly believe the Earth is flat. I think they've just come to realize that going against the grain has given them a certain amount of attention that they wouldn't get otherwise. Mark himself said that he would never leave the FE community even if he found out it was round.

[@markymark443]

They’re all just elaborate trolls imo.

[@craigyoung8008]

The reason Nathan angrily shouts and shuts down any discussion that could lead to a deeper understanding of the “flat Earth model” is that he knows damn well the Earth is a globe. He knows the lines of thought that will expose it as such. He knows that people realising they’ve been misled will dry up the source of handouts that “earn” his living. Otherwise there would be no reason for him to obstruct questions or to lose his cool the way he does.

[@fostena]

Hey Eric, why don't you zoom the Sun back into view after sunset? That should be quite easy!

[@danielthomastanner]

Got eem!

[@kasperzak]

I’m terrified to hear their answer to that! XD

[@naezjinra]

@@kasperzak I'm actually excited to hear this, it's great for building lore for DnD.

[@coyley72]

Eric, you could look at the sun through your telescope too. Your mate Donald Trump thinks looking at the sun is the correct thing to do too.

[@srinivastatachar4951]

You haven't heard of the 'personal bubble of perspective' that you carry around with you at all times? No? That's what makes it impossible to bring the sun or moon back into view after they've set! Duh! LOL! What is this 'personal bubble of perspective', you ask? Well, it's the model of perspective that the FE's have made up as special pleading in order to explain the disappearance of the sun, moon and stars below the horizon, just as they've made up a special model of atmospheric refraction to explain the disappearance of things like boats, bottom first, over the horizon... First, perspective doesn't work like that, and second, they have no explanation of how this special atmospheric refraction works! And their 'model' is rife with special pleading galore! ====================================================================================================================================================

[@ultdarrspdr6583]

I love it when they say "the law of perspective", which is a law that you use to generate a fake 3D image when drawing

[@frocat5163]

Yep. Nothing better than using artistic techniques and definitions to "prove" something scientific. Real perspective can be calculated; artistic perspective is created by the artist placing a subjective vanishing point at the location of their choosing.

[@eddominates]

@@frocat5163 ding ding ding

[@icedriver2207]

@@frocat5163 Wait I have a degree in animation are you saying all my work is fake. No it CGI. LOL (I apologize Creaky for taking your clearly copyrighted term)

[@frocat5163]

@@icedriver2207 I don't think I said anything at all about animation or SEE...GEE...EYEEEEEEEE.

[@Deebz270]

@@icedriver2207 So much for having a degree... Given that you can't read. Or not concentrating enough to know that *adam harp* said nothing about fake anything... That was the originator of this sub-thread - *UllDerrSpdr* who claims that the ''law of perspective' is the law one uses to generate a *fake* 3D image when drawing... Pay attention and PROOF what your commenting on.

[@KatKevaKelise]

I’m currently suffering crippling depression and anxiety to the point where I can’t even leave where I live to go outside. I just wanted to say a massive thank you Dan for helping keep me a little bit sane while this is going on, without you and others I don’t think I could cope. I just wanted you to know how much good you’re doing, not just in the scientific sense. Thank you.

[@Playboyy1985]

How are you doing these days?

[@DannyCamie]

what ever you're going through, you can push through!!

[@carlsapartments8931]

Hello Kat, sorry to hear you are having a tough time with depression, pleased do reading on vitamin D3/depression and also the link between micro-biome health and depression, it has made a huge difference for me, best wishes!

[@stilltrash]

Hey it’s been two years and I (we) just want to say that I (we) hope you’re doing alright :)

[@Stoneman06660]

These Flerfers have gone from amusing to sickening. "Understand nothing; disbelieve everything." The Flerfer creed.

[@johneagle1855]

Sadly it doesn't end at Flat Earth.

[@shawnpitman876]

Also: everything on TV is fake, but all of their youtube evidence is rock solid and can't be debunked by anything.

[@marsa7600]

This guy clearly never used a sextant before, he has no idea about celestial navigation. Long before GPS, navigators used a device called ‘sextant’ to determine the angle of a celestial body. From that data, the latitude of their current location can be determined. In the Northern hemisphere, navigators usually used Polaris. Using a sextant, they measured the angle between Polaris and the horizon. The angle would be very close to the latitude of their current position. In the Southern hemisphere, they did the same thing but with the south celestial pole. The problem is that there’s no bright star close to the south celestial pole, unlike Polaris in the North. So, they used the nearby Crux and Pointer stars to determine the approximate location of the south celestial pole. The angle between the south celestial pole and the horizon is the same as the latitude of the observer. Celestial navigation is possible only because the Earth is spherical. We make use of the knowledge of the correct figure of the Earth for the purposes of navigation. This is how our ancestors were able to travel to the other side of the world (and back to the original location) without the modern technology we have today. imgur.com/Lb9j84c

[@marsa7600]

So do you know what a sextant is and how do we use it? (This is a sextant: imgur.com/rtphF78 ) What do you know about celestial navigation? We consider stars to be placed on a celestial sphere. www.weekendnotes.com/im/003/08/how-the-night-sky-works.jpg As you should know, we have two celestial poles. From the northern hemisphere, you can't see the south celestial pole if you look south - you can't see Sigma Octantis, Magellanic Clouds, Crux. But if you look north, you can see star trails rotating anticlockwise. From the southern hemisphere, you can't see the north celestial pole if you look north - you can't see Polaris. But if you look south, you can see star trails rotating clockwise. www.reddit.com/r/flatearth/comments/eunlji/star_rotation_sydney_south_celestial_pole_debunks/ kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3_Mf315aLp7f9E Startrail & Timelapse 2015 - Northern vs Southern Hemisphere kzbin.info/www/bejne/i4eUh2xjo9OUd9U

[@marsa7600]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i4eUh2xjo9OUd9U - Celestial Navigation (instruction video)

[@marsa7600]

And yeah, I'm a sailor. I finished Maritime University and now I'm a deck officer. No, the Earth isn't flat and Eric Dumbay has no idea about celestial navigation, sextant, navigation, orthodromic navigation....

[@engineeredlifeform]

@@marsa7600 Hello Sailor! (sorry, just had to : -) ) I was going to make a similar point wrt the Sextant, and that it's been used successfully to navigate ships around the globe,,.. old Eric needs to show us how a Sextant can work on a flat plane, he can't do that of course, but then he'd probably get all snowflakey and claim he was having his opinions oppressed if we asked for real maths.

[@Mandelbrot_Set]

@@marsa7600 Give me a break! That proves nothing. You are supposed to use a frogs leg. No wait, that is a way of measuring voltage if the leg jerks. My bad. 😆🤣😁 Excuse my ignorance, but do you use a table of where the star is supposed to be? How did elder sailors know what time it is? What about the rocking of the boat? I am not arguing. I know that you are correct. There are just some gaps that I would like to fill in in my knowledge.

[@epicragegaming2016]

the problem with flat earth is its never " this is our proof" its always " this is the hole in your proof therefore im right"

[@jaybear7272]

Eric Dubay: "NASA is trying to infantilise us!" Also Eric Dubay: "Oooh, look at those globe earth cartoons!"

[@Markle2k]

And speeding up her speech to make her sound more childish.

[@sheemahashimali3193]

@@Markle2k true

[@lidbass]

I think, to be fair, he speeded her up to make his video shorter, ir rather so he had more time to waffle on, but your comment still made me smile! Thanks for that!

[@MisterAndrewBuckley]

Dubay is so disingenuous and manipulative he'll soon be debunking hi own gibberish

[@jcskyknight2222]

He already does in this video. His pictures over a “flat surface” are obviously no use because you can still see the whole of a boat before it reaches the horizon, much further than that image.

[@John.0z]

@@jcskyknight2222 Did you expect any better of him?

[@aerofiles5044]

He did in this video. He was trying to disprove the globe earth, when he showed the dogcam footage, that doesn't have fisheye, and shows a curve. Eric is a conman, but his braindead followers literally don't notice these things at all. i.imgur.com/LAMGLjL.png

[@fromagefrizzbizz9377]

@@aerofiles5044 No, it's worse than that. The Dogcam video, while it's fairly good when the horizon is mid-screen, whenever the camera rocks upwards (so the horizon is low) is clearly fisheying like nobody's business.

[@aerofiles5044]

@@fromagefrizzbizz9377 There were 2 cameras on the dogcam, one one was fisheye, and the other was not.

[@Alex.The.Lionnnnn]

Two things. 1. When is he going to zoom in on Sydney Harbour Bridge with a camera on a weather balloon? 2. Will someone pleeeease fund the creation of a steel box, perhaps several boxes inside one another with tamper sensors of all kinds between each box. He can choose the camera, set it up and make sure nothing but an on/off button and capture button are present. Send it to the ISS, have someone film them using it to photograph the earth amd then return the box to him.

[@Roxfox]

"People can lie and pictures can be faked and neither of them are permissible as evidence, now let me explain how it really works with the help of these pictures"

[@icedriver2207]

And if its so easy to prove the earth is flat why haven't they provided actual proof instead of constantly beating around the bush and not answering the questions.

[@standoughope]

"Pictures can be fake..." then proceeds to show footage of "space bubbles" that we should accept as evidence.

[@paulesterline5714]

Photos taken by NASA that photo shops everything, but I guess this time they CAN be trusted....

[@unitedfools3493]

Just in case you didn't know the bubble footage is real, it's water that sublimates from the astronaut's space suit cooling unit. The flatties think it's like air bubbles in a pool despite watching the bubbles going in all directions which you think would give them a clue that it's not underwater on Earth.

[@paulesterline5714]

@@unitedfools3493 oh I knew that, but Eric says NASA is all fake. So Eric what is it? Are they all fake or only yhe ones you want to be fake? The ice crystals don't actually thing like bubbles. I am surprised Eric is dumb enough (ok maybe not) to put the 2 videon clips side by side so it is easy to see the difference, between air bubbles in water on Earth and ice crystals in space.

[@shaneeslick]

Yeah Ryan, funny how one minute it's 'NASA fakes all their videos with CGI to make the Earth look like a Globe' then 1 minute later 'Ooh, look at thiiis NASA videoo you can clearly see the evidence that prooves Flat Earth'

[@fromagefrizzbizz9377]

@@unitedfools3493 Er, no, it's pieces of ice. You can't see "sublimated water" - it's a gas.

[@Fantasm2Productions]

The photo of the rays of light coming through the roof suggests the sun is basically a few feet above the roof of that building. So, everywhere else must be in darkness?

[@terryfuldsgaming7995]

I love how he calls them "space bubbles" then shows the astronauts in the training pool and the bubbles dont look or move the same at all, and he thinks that is evidence FOR him! lol

[@ldh9440]

Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. SMH!

[@aaronburtram3175]

Yeah, I pointed this out in another thread. Plus the objects in the space video moved way faster than a bubble rises in water.

[@Red-jl1qr]

THAT'S WHAT I WAS THINKING, it's so ridiculoussss I can't

[@lightbeforethetunnel]

There actually are some official NASA videos with huge swaths of bubbles moving just like that. Check out ODD TV's channel to see them.

[@haydensanford1987]

@@lightbeforethetunnel So... what are you trying to say?

[@malfaro3l]

It’s pretty sad that the best argument against the shape of the earth’s shadow, which completely destroys his position on the shape of the earth, the size of the sun, and their relative distance, is “but you have to look up to figure that out”.

[@frocat5163]

Right? He's too intellectually dishonest to make a truthful statement. We have plenty of evidence from the Earth's surface to prove it's not a magical space pizza, but we can also look at the moon and find MORE evidence the Earth isn't a magical space pizza.

[@juidude634]

Even if we wud take Eric to space, he stel wodent believe it! "The windows make it look round!!!🤯" Peace out✌🏻🌍🪐🇫🇮

[@sweetdurt2143]

When reality is against what you believe most people prefer to change the reality rather than changing their beliefs. -me

[@aryanayush136]

One day this quote will be famous believe me

[@unknownalsounknown4238]

Noice

[@xxtravdamanxx]

QUOTE STEALER!!!!!!

[@sweetdurt2143]

@@xxtravdamanxx?

[@2LucasKane3]

@Harry M I woudn't even fault them for being this way. I was a fundamentalist creationist christian for 10 years. No amount of evidence could have convinced me that the earth is older than 6000 years. Only by watching atheist videos (I watched a ton of viced rhino videos) was it possible that I am an atheist now. But that means you must be willing to actually challenge your own views. That in itself is hard even for "normal" people. Once you have adopted a world view, it is very difficult to let go of it.

[@markborder906]

How can Eric call a claim a : “Dinosaur Claim”? He does not believe Dinosaurs either. Edit - I see from a comment below, I missed a word out above. There should either be “in” before, or “ existed” after the word Dinosaurs. I missed it both writing and checking. I can only assume some of Eric’s stupidity rubbed off on me - hopefully only temporarily.

[@davidlazarus67]

Wow that will upset those who think that humans and dinosaurs co-existed. The rest of us realise that the Flintstones was a cartoon.

[@39zack]

@@davidlazarus67 Dr dino was not prepared for that

[@Honky_time]

Kent is going to bop him soon lol

[@j.d.h.5153]

#onlyevolution #anticreationism #onlyscience

[@thecasualdiyer6729]

@@davidlazarus67 Yabba dabba doo!

[@robsalvv5853]

"The law of perspective of plane surfaces..." - more like the law of word salad.

[@srinivastatachar4951]

Actually, there are different types of perspective, and plane perspective is one of them. So is spherical perspective... Guess which one we're all observing on the surface of Earth? But there is no such thing as a 'law of perspective;' it's just a matter of geometry. ==================================================================================================================================================

[@srinivastatachar4951]

@@radbarij I should clarify, though, because what I said above can be misleading for those who may not have studied perspective towards an artistic and/or technical end. In general, perspective, as in the purely geometric effect that you get as a result of distance, is independent of the surface you're standing on and is purely linear. However, you can 'force' or distort perspective by arranging objects on different types of surfaces such as cylindrical, conical, spherical surfaces and such, or by using different types of lenses (forced, exaggerated, spherical or fish-eye effects, in addition to several other types of effects can be obtained with a good SLR). Which means that the perspective on the surface of the Earth is spherical perspective, but very closely approximates planar or linear perspective just because the planet is so huge compared to the size of a normal human being. This is why we are taught to put the vanishing point on the horizon, even though the actual vanishing point is slightly (imperceptible to the unaided eye) above the actual horizon. Sorry for the lengthy reply, but you can see that even this has been simplified and shortened, for entire volumes have been written on the subject. ======================================

[@srinivastatachar4951]

@@radbarij I don't remember all the books I've used to educate myself on the topic, but I.H. Morris is a good one. I've also used several textbooks prescribed to us for Technical Drawing (Civil and Mechanical Engineering courses) as well as books for the production of art, specifically, Stan Lee's 'How to Draw Superheroes'. So, as you can see, it runs the gamut, but basically, any book on perspective drawing, be it for technical courses or art, will suffice. =======================================

[@dat2ra]

I think it's more like The Law of Supply and Demand. Or The Law of the Land, or.....or....

[@dat2ra]

Funny how your pool ball "debunking" perfectly demonstrates how spherical objects project a circular shadow. Eric? Hello Eric?

[@TheBlueJimmy]

Do flat earthers know what “debunking” means? I’m not sure it means what they think it means...

[@therealzilch]

I'm pretty sure it doesn't mean what they think it means.

[@spoodlydoodler3552]

Im positive it doesnt mean what they think it means

[@1pierrr]

I’m certain it doesn’t mean what they think it means.

[@Beacon80]

It's inconceivable that it could mean what they think it means.

[@sonicpokemaster1]

It's improbable that it could mean what they think it means

[@romithromith]

_"People can lie."_ Yes Eric, like claiming that powerful zoom lenses can bring ships over the horizon back into view. Please show us that without the parlor trick involving a camera's expanding aperture peeking over the edge of a table when zoomed.

[@paulesterline5714]

Or shut us all up and bring the sun back into view after dark. It is very bright, should be easy to do with your P9000!

[@Eagle8599]

He won't because he knows he can't if he goes to a seaside and tries. It is straight up intellectual dishonestly and he's relying on people's laziness to keep them blind to the truth they can see with their own eyes.

[@tedferkin]

@@paulesterline5714 Also, if the sun is a spot light (which I think some of them actually proport, and only makes sense otherwise the sun should be visable 24 hours a day), then when you go to a high level in a balloon, the sun should disappear as we move around the shroud...... I think I might have actually lost an IQ point trying to rationalise that concept.

[@nancystowell4877]

@@tedferkin Thank you for that, I get headaches when I listen to the insanity they spew.

[@yes9880]

He was acting so brave trying to answer the first points, but as soon as eclipses where mentioned, he derived away from the point and started ignoring the argument, what a guy!

[@HellbirdIV]

6:52 "The fact of the matter is that the Law of Perspective-" Stop. What law is that, Eric? What property of light-refraction and the human brain's interpretation creates this law? Because I went looking and sure enough, unlike for example, the "law" of gravity, or the "law" of relativity, or even Godwin's law, I couldn't find any instances of the "law of perspective" being brought up in scientific literature or analysis. It's almost, Eric, like you're using the word "law" as though it is a magic spell, expecting people to accept that if you call something a "law" it must hold validity, because other physical properties are called "laws". But magic words aren't real, Eric. Your argument does not become more valid because you invoke spells. Reality has to support your claims - and it doesn't.

[@juidude634]

Bravo!!👍🇫🇮🤣 Hope Eric sees this comment..

[@juidude634]

Like your profile picture, liara✌️

[@dogwalker666]

Its like Oakley and his law of refraction.

[@Captain_Pudding]

The law of perspective: "The angle of attack proves I'm right, 1m=1000km."

[@timkilbourn5685]

I see the magic spells did not work on this heretic. Perhaps if we use the entire magic wording it will take affect. Ahllllaa peanut butter sandwiches! Bippity Boppity Boo! LAW! Now tell me that you now see the truth in my words!!

[@qasimahmad6748]

Here the tell us we are narcissistic when they constantly spew rubbish and garbage insults at us.

[@lidbass]

It’s called projection. They (subconsciously) realise their own failings and try to head off any criticism of such by attacking any opposition as quickly as possible. It would be ironic, if it weren’t so downright dishonest and dangerous.

[@warhawk9566]

"You're such a narcissist, now let me condescendingly talk down to you while I overly explain that because I can't understand your science, it must therefore be wrong."

[@Klinkertinlegs]

I like that he debunked himself with the “Space bubbles” showing that the ice crystals in space and the bubbles in the practice tank are completely different in shape, number, and behavior.

[@helloweener2007]

"People can lie" Ah yes, Eric Dubay knows this very well because he speaks from his own experience. He is the expert on this topic, so we should believe him. ;-)

[@beckydoesit9331]

Sci Man Dan purposefully left out the part Dubay brought up about Sigma Octantis point that ties all the southern continents together. I would say this is the biggest and most phenomenal flat Earth proof there is, yet he edits it out. How is it that all southern continents look toward the South Pole star, Sigma Octantis if they're looking in different directions? Globbers have no answer for this, but flats do. Which team are you on?

[@helloweener2007]

@@beckydoesit9331 All observations are explained by the globe and the earth moving around the sun. You can see the curvature if you want. Just go to the beach and look at the sea. And then go up to a lighthouse nearby. You can see further. I guess it works like with the north star. It is in south direction before it is a direction in a 3D system. A 2D map does not show it of course. And that is the problem with flat earth. You don't have a real direction for up an down.

[@dh84a3447]

@@beckydoesit9331 Sigma Octans, Two Celestial poles, The South celestial pole due South from All Southern continents simultaneously; proves that the earth is a Globe! From Pizza Earth, South or anti-North (because flat-wit astronomy has no explanation for South) is a different direction for all observers at different longitudes. It's not. The Southern hemisphere is where Flatters have no testable explanation for any observable phenomena. Try for instance predicting the distance between Sydney, Australia & Perth using flat-wit geometry? The distance you get is 3x the measured & published distance that thousands of truckers & pilots reaffirm every day & every year. Two poles seal the deal. The earth is a globe, just like every celestial body more than 500 miles in diameter, because...Gravity; which is why flat-nits have to take the absurd step of saying Gravity doesn't exist. Why don't they all just test their stupid theory by stepping off the nearest high building?

[@beckydoesit9331]

@@dh84a3447 Nice try, but no. The globe requires gravity to work which immediately disqualifies it. Flat Earth model requires no hocus pocus magic to work. Why is this so difficult for everyone?

[@dh84a3447]

@@beckydoesit9331 Answer: It (the Flat-wit Model) doesn't work, which is why no Commercial outfit relies on, or uses it, because they'd go out of business. Hocus-pocus is relying on a system which has no relevance to observed & measured reality. Other names are delusion, & fraud. Flat Earth is full of it.

[@cvbabc]

Dr. Thaller: "One of the ways we can see the Earth is round is the shape of its shadow cast on the moon." Eric Dubay: "That's like asking your butcher to weigh some meat so he grabs a ruler and measures his shoe." Me: "Whaaaat?"

[@allanrojas9226]

www.mlive.com/news/muskegon/2012/05/the_lights_of_milwaukee_seen_t.html where the curve at my guy and the guy said he can see the lights from Wisconsin with his eyes

[@manroopaf2295]

@@allanrojas9226 could it be? Is the earth flat?

[@allanrojas9226]

@@manroopaf2295 high possibility what I'm leaning towards the earth being flat in firmament

[@manroopaf2295]

@@allanrojas9226 and you've been watching the Sci man series? Not mocking, genuinely curious...I've found the explanations he provides in debunking flat earth claims pretty concise, but you could tell me where you think we get it wrong..

[@bigsherk42069]

@@manroopaf2295 he has posted that link misleadingly hoping people don’t look at the pictures and read everything. The picture in the article isn’t the picture of the mirage. The mirage is only a band of lights and it’s inverted. I like sciman btw. He’s not as much of a bully as everyone else. I’ve never seen a non hostile/no piece of crap flat earthers who couldn’t refute or debate without calling the other one names or sexual slurs, or cussing them out, and I know globers Eat it up and make them look so stupid, but sciman don’t. I don’t like the hostility. Like ftfe i like him but god he’s just such a dick

[@daveg-Vancouver_Island]

I love how they think if they were actually faking all these pics of earth, that they would actually make the land look like they are such different sizes, cuz in reality, they wouldn’t, it would look perfect every time!

[@bryanmcguire1958]

Eric said "Eratosthenes was debunked at the time..." Eric never mentioned who by. Are we expected to simply take Eric's word on that! (Hi Eric, see what I did there!!)

[@b.p.rwebber8098]

Of course we are cos yoga.

[@srinivastatachar4951]

Or, more importantly, how they were debunked... Is he privy to this information? Because I certainly haven't heard anything to that effect, and I haven't come across anyone else who has either! Or is he talking about Samuel Rowbotham and his infamous Bedford level experiment (even that doesn't address Eratosthenes, but then, this is a FE we're dealing with, so relevance has no place in their arguments!)? ===================================================================================================================================================

[@aaronburtram3175]

@@srinivastatachar4951 Even the bedford experiment was disproven as a result of refraction. Another man was able to recreate the experiment and adjust it to account for refraction and prove the opposite of the original results.

[@srinivastatachar4951]

@@aaronburtram3175 I know. But FE's completely ignore that part! Either they're ignorant of it, or they willfully ignore it, just as they ignore all other pieces of evidence against their absolutely indefensible position! And they keep asking for evidence of a 'globe Earth!' Sigh! ===================================

[@Jambuc829]

@@srinivastatachar4951 All they say is fake this fake that and when they come across something that can’t say is fake they will just say the person is lying or being paid to lie. They aren’t actually skeptical of a globe earth. Especially the conspiracy theorists FE’s or the religious FE’s. They literally pick and choose want they want to believe and pick and choose what they want to disbelieve. The irony of religious FE’s is definitely appalling. Their disbelief of a globe earth because there isn’t enough evidence but believe in a Bible they don’t even know who wrote the book where it comes from or anything about it. But 100% believe everything in that book. Like I said FE’s aren’t skeptical. They are willfully ignorant.

[@sicfxmusic]

FE: People can lie Also FE: Earth is flat

[@aloyspaupe7403]

It's crazy how flat earthers love to compare things that are incomparable, like the sun and a stove...

[@jimjambananaslam3596]

I think they see guys like Neil Degrasse Tyson use everyday metaphors to explain scientific concepts and then think they can do the same thing to *disprove* those concepts, as if the entire thing hinges on the metaphor lol

[@kskdtr]

Wait wait wait... it is ok to have your personal opinion on subjective matters, personal tastes on books and movies, etc.. but when you are proved wrong, it is just wrong

[@hapaxl.6075]

Also, when you share that opinion publically, is fair game.

[@frocat5163]

This is the key. Opinions are subjective and cannot be proven right or wrong. I can say, "Apples are the best fruit," and I'm welcome to believe that. But everyone else is perfectly welcome to say, "Apples are the worst fruit," and their statement would be just as valid as mine. That's what it means to say, "Everyone is entitled to their opinion." If, however, I were to say, "Apples are grown below ground like potatoes," I can't claim the 'protection' of everyone being allowed an opinion...because that statement isn't an opinion. Additionally, being allowed to have an opinion doesn't mean that anyone else is obligated to respect our opinion or consider it as valid as other opinions. Flerfing idiots don't have an opinion about the Earth's shape, though. It is impossible to have an opinion about something factual, other than whether or not one likes or dislikes that fact. A belief isn't an opinion without a subjective qualifier. We don't get to have an opinion on the sum of 2+2. Claiming, "In _my_ opinion, 2+2=8," doesn't provide some kind of unassailable defense for that statement. Making an objectively false claim and attempting to defend its validity by calling that claim an opinion is nothing but stupidity and/or ignorance. And no one is obligated to respect that claim.

[@kskdtr]

@@frocat5163 couldn't agree more... the only thing I do not share, when it comes to personal opinions on things like food, books, ecc... where taste matters, have to be respected; it is fair to disagree, but no one is right nor wrong... when it comes to factual claims, such as saying that a room at 20C is colder than one at 10 C, it cannot be respected nor defended the freedom to think it.

[@frocat5163]

@@kskdtr I should probably clarify, when I said no one is obligated to respect anyone else's opinion, I didn't mean to imply we should attack others for holding an opinion that differs from our own. The "rules" of polite interpersonal interaction dictate we shouldn't attack someone for their opinion (when it actually is an opinion). My intention was to point out that too many people seem to think the idea that, "Everyone is entitled to their opinion," means that everyone's opinion _must_ be respected by everyone, without question, regardless of what that opinion might be. For example, racists are certainly entitled to their opinion that their ethnicity is better than others, but none of us are obligated to show any respect for the racist's opinion.

[@kskdtr]

@@frocat5163 hat off, i bow to you

[@mattiascavero]

I feel uncomfy just listening to his voice😝 so much BS from that guy.

[@juidude634]

I feel you!! Very anoing guy..

[@shaneeslick]

Mr Dubay sets of my 'Stranger Danger' tingles & I get an upset stomach when he talks 😟

[@dross4207]

It’s definitely not the kind of voice that a drugged and tied up girl wants to wake up to and hear “don’t worry, I’m not going to hurt you”.

[@phillipmaccreviss]

Never seen his face but by the voice alone you just know he has one hell of a punchable face

[@bornestellar6334]

A lot of over-pronunciation and clicks combined with a ratty sounding voice while spewing nonsense. A recipe for rage in my book.

[@DudeTheMighty]

Flat earth is just a fascinating phenomenon. Medieval astronomer who washes himself in a river: "The movements of the stars indicate that we live upon an orb." Modern 'astronomer' with an unimaginably advanced camera: "Yep! Looks flat to me!"

[@maul_2184]

He really is crazy. I'm sure you could take a flat earther up to space they could see the curve themselves and they would still claim they were drugged or they were viewing everything through some a tv screen taped to the windows or something....

[@smashexentertainment676]

It's a religious state of mind. As William Lane Craig said: if he was presented with undeniable proof that christianity is false, he will make a deliberate effort to ignore or dismiss it in order to commit to dogma. Coz of (oh the irony!) the spooky feelings that god exists. In flat earther words: trust your senses.

[@petelaurie1920]

That's when you throw them out the airlock for a while till they've seen sense lol

[@milosjanos5058]

crazy/stupid, or dishonest. Both cases are bad. Anyway this flatearth sharade of his, brings him lot of attention and possibly money too. So why should he stop?

[@maxine_q]

@@milosjanos5058 That's the point. He knows the earth is a globe, but that doesn't bring in money.

[@pyrobryan]

I love how his example of objects disappearing bottom first over the horizon requires the camera to be half way underground, or the horizon to be at eye level.

[@carolinesavva5376]

I had no idea that Eric guy was still around. I thought he tripped and fell off the edge ages ago

[@scottydu81]

There is a video of a paleontologist on Joe Rogan’s show going absolute ham on a Dubay video about dinosaurs being fake

[@TheDarrenJones]

Bear in mind Dubay is also a Holocaust denier. His vocal tone sounds a lot more sinister when you think of that while he's moaning.

[@Das_Beachy]

I was unaware of that. Not only is he a moron, he is a horrible person as well.

[@NoodleKeeper]

Holy shit, I didn't know that. Do you have a source for that?

[@MotoGoato]

He's also a Hitler and Nazi sympathiser

[@Starhawke_Gaming]

@Esquilax - has someone hacked your account? Looking at your previous posts you used to be very against flat earth, yet your recent comments on this video seem pro flat earth.

[@midnight8341]

@Esquilax just saying... Over here in Germany, this guy would be in jail if he were to deny the Holocaust. Because that's one thing we don't joke around with.

[@sthormar]

I just love how crepuscular rays will be the definite proof of distance to the sun, you just draw a line through the rays and where they converger you have the sun, like 3.000 miles away. And at the same time you have a photo of skylight windows showing crepuscular rays that converge not more than a hundred meter above that roof. And both are definite proof of the exact location of the sun.

[@cambridgemart2075]

If you see the crepuscular rays from altitude, they appear to converge towards the ground, proof that the sun is underground!

[@Eagle8599]

In one sentence Eric says the sun is 3,000 miles away and in another he tells how crepuscular rays show the sun to be much, much, much closer. He contradicts himself multiple times in his own video and anyone who believes him needs to pay more attention.

[@Ado.D]

These comments are gold! 😂😂😂

[@RobertEmery]

So apparently anticrepucular rays prove there are two sun's? Asking for a friend 😂

[@Deebz270]

@@cambridgemart2075 LOL

[@roscoewhite3793]

"Flat Earth Legend" must rank among the least respected title ever, if not at the very bottom of the heap along with "Creationist Legend."

[@ericb3157]

reminds me of a line in a book: "a legend in his own mind." he was talking about the notorious "pork barrel" politician Robert C. Byrd. he's named SO many buildings and stuff after himself it's absurd.

[@muntherdoesstuff9615]

Alternate title: somebody who knows about science because she studied in the field vs some random yoga instructor who watched a couple videos and think he is an expert in science and thinks he knows better than nasa

[@Hathwos]

A classic Dunning-Kruger 🙃

[@theultimatereductionist7592]

​@@Hathwos Exactly why we should shove DK back on them. First, yoga is meaningless bullshit. EVERYBODY is an expert in it, because there's NO universally agreed quantifiable testable definition of what it is.

[@Hathwos]

@@theultimatereductionist7592 😅👍

[@kennymartin5976]

Eric's arrogance is easily makes him one of the least likeable Flat Earthers.

[@fromagefrizzbizz9377]

Oh my no, Eric's arrogance is the least of it. He's one of the most despicable pieces of human dogshit around. Which is unsurprising, being a full on card-carrying nazi.

[@tactcom7]

It's his voice that gets me. He has a very punchable voice.

[@artifax1407]

"Eric's arrogance is easily makes him one of the least likeable Flat Earthers." I'm not sure - it's a crowded field.

[@tactcom7]

@Gil Monteverde I don't think any of them truly believe it. They're just all aboard the guillable money train.

[@laughinsohard7888]

I love how Eric shows Flat Earth "memes" in his videos as if any human being with a sense of humor would laugh at them.

[@RockDavid]

I've always asked this one question always shuts Flat earthers up "What does America and all other 6 COnt. have to benefit all joining forces to make the world think earth is flat, and don't mention the super secret super base in the snow please..."

[@smashexentertainment676]

You mean "to make the world think Earth is a globe". Some say it's to hide god. Although he's perfect at hiding himself.

[@timorieseler276]

There's nothing that shuts them up...

[@NoodleKeeper]

Two things they clearly didn't think through are: If America never went to the moon, Russia would have exposed up as fast as they possibly could have, Cold War and whatnot. And, if all of the countries are supposed to be in cahoots, then you have to believe that Kim Jong Un kept this secret whilst simultaneously having problems with America. He would have exposed that shit so fast, just to watch the world burn.

[@angelfigueroa310]

Only benefit is for flat earthers and their annual sales of flat earth styrofoam models it’s a multi 20$ annual industry .

[@smashexentertainment676]

@@angelfigueroa310 Dubay and some other frauds publish stupid books, sell t-shirts and milk their flock by Patreon, Paypal and all other imaginable kinds of links.

[@ateriana5116]

It's funny that his perspective claim at 7:07 directly contradicts him. "Points higher than the camera project above." "Points lower than the camera project below." Also he claims that scientific method requires questioning to reach increasingly precise conclusions, then complains that we measured earth more accurately to reach more precise conclusions.

[@doctyler3920]

Eric covered the whole boat vanishing over the horizon, he claimed NASA added water between the boat and the camera... Not Kidding! Seriously! Hahahahaha

[@77willnot]

"Having your own thoughts is ok" says Mr Dubay, well not when there is plenty of evidence that these thoughts are bullshit, such as in flat earth and holocaust denying which you are prolific in both Eric.

[@HoneyannAmaya]

Ah ahh ahh BULLSHITOHVITCH!!! K a h zoontide! Bwah haha! Its still a sphere! Great comment!⭕💱🕔🔘🔵⚫🔴🅾✈🎭🔮💣💡We've got lots of balls! Ring ring😅☎📞hello? Flat earther? Yes? SHUT UP NOBODY CARES!!!!!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😊🔴🔴⚫⚫🔴🔴⚫💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣 .........I JOKE I JOKE.. BUT REALLY STOP WORSHIPPING THR EARTH IT CANT SAVE SOULS PEOPLE...TIME TO WAKE UP.TIME IS UP!

[@leftpastsaturn67]

@@HoneyannAmaya Are you high, or just remorselessly stupid?

[@aerofiles5044]

@@HoneyannAmaya Go see a specialist.

[@77willnot]

@@HoneyannAmaya did you forget to take your medicine this morning? Your reply doesn't make any sense. Maybe if I take a load of hippy pills and smoke some weed I might be able to read something in to it.

[@aaronabbey2604]

@@77willnot Don't bother it won't work. Iam currently trying to figure it out whilst under the influence myself.

[@doms.6701]

This guy sounds like a classmate I had. He graduated top of his highschool, when he got to college he thought he knew more than the professor. I remember one instance of him trying to talk down to our professor because she simplified a concept for an intro class. So she had him come up and try solving something using calculus and he was bright red with embarrassment

[@9547Gaming]

Love these flat earth Friday's. I Look forward to watch them at the end of every week

[@9547Gaming]

@Esquilax ok I missed spelt words. Some people my have a disability that affect them that way

[@basjar2]

From the thumbnail, I was pretty sure you had Dave Mustaine on the show!

[@machidaman]

Was literally about to make a Mustaine comment!

[@Slum0vsky]

We wish, we wish...

[@dross4207]

If he was singing “Liar”, it would be quite fitting.

[@andrewduff2048]

He shows the bottom of someone disappearing bottom up on a football field when they are designed to be curved so water runs off them. A very good and expensive field will have as little curve as possible that still allows the field to drain. Most fields, like the one he showed will have a lot of curve because it’s easier to build. A baseball field can’t be curved because of the nature of the sport so they often use tarps to cover up the field when rain is forecasted before a game if there won’t be time to dry out and during rain delays. If a soccer or football field is perfectly flat then they have an underground drainage system and you can’t just walk around on those fields like you can with public fields. I’m not an expert but I did play on some sexy fields in high school.

[@dxjxc91]

7:00 This graphic shows perfectly clear that on a flat earth, no matter how far the observer is they can always see the feet of the observed. As indicated by the straight line that is drawn from the camera to the feet. On a globe, we expect the surface to obscure the subject starting from the bottom. On a flat earth, we would expect the subject to always be completely unobscured. Perspective means things further away have a smaller angular size, not that their position sinks below the surface.

[@totalstrangerthing7419]

Eric Dubay: People can lie. Me: yes Eric they can. Just look @ yourself. U do it all the time.

[@39zack]

The only truth he ever spoken

[@mjh26uk]

The sad thing is he doesnt think he is lying, he actually believes the Earth is flat.

[@errolflynn476]

7:01 So why not zoom into the guy walking over the mound and bring his feet back in to view then Eric?

[@crazyeye1]

You rock “psy-op Dan”. Keep it up!!! Whatever happened to the agent skits, was he.... compromised?

[@zappawench6048]

Yes, I liked the agent too!

[@spoodlydoodler3552]

Agreed. The Agent was too good... ;-;

[@Mandelbrot_Set]

He had so much security on his phone that audio communication was no longer possible. (The Agent never said that. I made it up.) (What is that noise, outside?) (Ah- Argh!)

[@jonnerztube]

Eric is another member of, Tourette's Wellbeing And Treatment Society

[@JB_inks]

He should join Cambridge University's Netball Team

[@jonnerztube]

@@JB_inks ROTFLMAO i tried for ages to get that, well done.

[@aryanayush136]

Lol

[@paulesterline5714]

Can't Understand Normal Thinking is a fine organization he should belong to. I will pay his dues the first year.

[@lidbass]

I’m not sure, but I’ve heard rumours that he is a fully paid up member of the Falkirk Under-graduate Circular Kingdom World International Template Society. But I may be wrong.

[@davidpickens8800]

Eric Dubay could die, then get past of the Gates of Heaven and looking down at Earth, see the curve and think to himself "Man this Conspiracy goes all the way to the top"

[@boterlettersukkel]

Variations on the same theme. A flat earther dies and is waiting at the pearly gates. St Peter says to the man, before entering heaven you may ask God one question. The man asks God , is the earth flat or a globe. God replied, the Earth is most definitely a globe . The man exclaimed, holy crap , the conspiracy runs deeper than I could have ever imagined.

[@ambassadorkees]

Eric Dubay. Yes, always a good attractor. Thanks to people like him. A gift that keeps giving.

[@Beacon80]

I love it when they insist that you can use trigonometry at two points to prove a local sun. Yet they never can explain why, if you use *three* points, you'll get conflicting answers. On that note, have any of these flat earthers actually taken the measurements themselves?

[@Eagle8599]

He also says the sun is 3,000 miles away. In my book, that is not local! Kid: "Hey Mom I'm gonna go hangout with my friends." Mom: "Are you going some place local?" Kid: "Yeah, it's only 3,000 miles away!" Mom: 😶🤦🏻

[@frocat5163]

Of course they haven't taken the measurements themselves. If these jackasses aren't smart enough to understand you can't TRIangulate something with only two observations, why would we expect them to be capable of performing the necessary observations?

[@icedriver2207]

It would be nice if they provided proof and citations on all of their answers.

[@Mandelbrot_Set]

Like most of Dubay material, he plagiarized the 3,000 mile height from Samuel Rowbotham's book from the 19th Century. I have seen a couple of flat earthers make a calculation of the distance to the Sun using invalid geometry using one location at one instant of time. Recently somebody used the tangent of the Sun's angle above the horizon multiplied by the distance to the sub-solar point to calculate its height. I kept telling him that you have to be in the same plane as the point below the object to use that formula, but he never did get it. I gave him multiple calculations giving different results and it just went over his head.

[@frocat5163]

@@Mandelbrot_Set I mean...can any flerfing idiot understand any mathematical formula more complex than 2+2=4? Hell, I'm not even convinced they can grasp that equation.

[@andysmith5464]

"Flat Earth legend" ... three words that simply don't belong together!

[@markymark443]

Pretty sure it’s being used in an ironic way lol

[@boterlettersukkel]

It is the same as a "nigerian prince with a few millions to share with you"

[@danaborgman8526]

I had not seen that composite photo of the eclipse before. That was terrific! 👍

[@RockDavid]

I think its insane People spend their whole life training to fly and become the best of the best, to simply do green screens from flat earth to fake space? It not adding up guys

[@therealzilch]

That proves that they are not human, but rather aliens or demons. :)

[@smashexentertainment676]

In order to believe that the Earth is flat you have to also accept by default that at least a billion+ people already knows that the Earth is flat, somehow spends unimaginable budgets to keep conspiracy running and is lying to the rest 6,8 billion. You don't even need to go so far as to debate the shape. The whole idea is retarded from the start.

[@lamontcranston8181]

@Esquilax the arguments don’t make any sense anyway. What’s to understand?

[@smashexentertainment676]

@Esquilax enlighten me.

[@eddiebruv]

@Esquilax The flat earth ‘arguments’ are gibberish.

[@diamondsmasher]

The fact that he thinks an object going really far away on a flat earth would “disappear” and not just shrink in size is mind boggling. If telescopes can see Jupiter, clearly a good terrestrial telescope would prove you could see the Eiffel Tower from anywhere on earth..... and yet no one has done that.

[@TheSpeegy]

And when is he going to provide any kind of "proof" of the flat earth? Never has, never will. It is easier just o say "Na hah" when given any globe proof. Glad he has finally agreed that all religion (including his own) is just dogma.

[@American-Plague]

10:10 So I guess this suggests that the sun is less than a mile high or so?

[@Eagle8599]

Nope. Dubay himself said it was 3,000 miles away. Very local. Satellites and weather balloons can only go up so high, but the sun is almost 10 times higher despite what the videos and pictures taken from low Earth orbit show.

[@carlsapartments8931]

Eric made lots of accusations about scientists and said nasty things about them personally..... Eric then proceeded to do exactly what he accused them of doing and also has not offered any scientific proof "just what other people said or did"... YES mental health is definitely at play here. Eric needs professional help but will never get any.

[@ToutCQJM]

I love Michelle Thaller. She has a wonderfully clear way of speaking.

[@Mandelbrot_Set]

And ten times the IQ of any flat earther. Here is the video that Dubay is debasing: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eXjNd3SbZZZrpaM

[@KCODacey]

Way too fast for my liking. At first I thought her portions in this video were sped up. It’s obvious she’s knowledgeable and knows how to present her argument. It’s in the delivery that I find overwhelming. But that’s on me, not her.

[@paulweston1106]

@@Mandelbrot_Set That's an insult to her, only 10x; there are single cell organisms with 10x the IQ of the average flat earther.

[@davidkeller6156]

Eric’s followers really went after her on a personal level in some of their comments. I called them out on it. My comments were deleted and I was blocked, I’d love to see his channel gone. He needs to be attacked by all the debunkers. Bloody coward.

[@Alex_Mitchell]

@@KCODacey They ARE sped up.

[@toddonhigh]

Holy shit this is the Holocaust-denying “rapper” guy who had his entire channel deleted by YT while Hbomberguy was making his measured response video. I would have thought/hoped he’d fade into obscurity after something like that, but apparently not. Also my favorite has to be that pool table meme. The shadows are the important thing, guys, and the shadows are ALL ROUND lmao

[@simonh10]

Dubay thinks that when he drives in his car, the wheels rotate the earth in his direction of travel. Dubay thinks that the earth’s population is about 800 because that’s how many he’s seen. Dubay refuses to believe in spaghetti because how can something long and skinny come from an oblate spheroid.

[@ndhammer]

When Dan said it Eric Dubay I was like "Oh boy Mr. Boring Voice!"

[@calvinmarkpayne]

He speaks like there is a comma between each word.

[@HarryMudd]

He's the "Space Comma" 😜

[@Captain_Pudding]

That's just because his brain functions like a diesel engine on a cold morning when you forgot to plug it in

[@ewarwoowar9938]

So many flearthers, and other nonsense peddlers have really grating voices and ways of speaking. What's up with that?

[@icedriver2207]

I think he has to keep looking at his script so he won't laugh at the gibberish he is spouting.

[@hughjaynus9623]

Your intro cracked me up so much 😂 "In short - no, but it'll be fun to watch anyway" 🤣🤣

[@adamgriggs5147]

"Her final and most ridiculous proof...," he says, when she mentions seeing the shape of the Earth during a Lunar Eclipse. You're argument has just been 'eclipsed' Eric. I think it's time to let your Flearth theory go. It is insanity, after all, to keep repeating the same thing and expect different results. So, how many times do you need to be debunked before you accept that you live on a globe? Great video SciManDan!

[@maxine_q]

He doesn't care about being debunked. He only cares about selling his books. He knows the earth is a globe.

[@adamgriggs5147]

@@maxine_q Now that is a conspiracy theory I can actually get on board with! I never thought of it that way! Eric just pretending to be a Flearther for fame and money! Whether that is the case or not, he is most certainly a bit of a douchebag.

[@thunderflare59]

Eric may be entitled to his own opinion, but he's not entitled to his own facts.

[@icedriver2207]

He is one of those people that thinks you should find your own truth even if you have to make it up.

[@allanrojas9226]

The facts he says, are shit u can experience in real life. Like you can't do an experiment of gravity in real life, you can't get a big ball with mass in a vacuum attracting smaller ones. So gravity not real then the whole ball model destroyed. Show me experiment of this happening ooo wait u can't cause gravity's not real. The Cavendish experiment has the balls on a string.

[@thunderflare59]

@@allanrojas9226 Cavendish, dum-dum. Eric as stupid as he is racist.

[@allanrojas9226]

@@thunderflare59 did u not read my comment dumb dumb the Cavendish experiment has the ball hanging by strings not in a vaccum space

[@thunderflare59]

@@allanrojas9226 you said gravity isn't real. The Cavendish experiment is proof gravity exists. Your absurd demands for an impossible experiment are irrelevant. Gravity is real regardless of your stupidity and incredulity.

[@AngBlairNZ]

So the only proof the flat earther will accept is if they see the whole world for themselves? Well why don’t they “go into space” themselves?? And if they haven’t seen ALL of the flat earth with their own eyes, then how can they believe the earth is actually flat?

[@chrisvancil2508]

Next time you need to speed up Eric's voice so he sounds like he inhaled helium. And slow down Michelle to normal speed.

[@rodshop5897]

Yes, if you are going to speed up one person, speed them all up. Otherwise, just keep them at normal speed.

[@christophercripps7639]

Flatter: All the proofs are hearsay & not evidence or have been "debunked." Take my word for it ... Flatter sets out to prove earth is flat using "water finds its own level" & a long canal. Disproves at least one if not both asertions. Flatter sets out to photograph ships hull supposedly over the horizon using zoom lense; let me first climb up this mountain.

[@aaronburtram3175]

Not to mention that the boat was moving parallel to the shore at speed and creating no wake?

[@177SCmaro]

In WWII some of the battleships could fire projectiles over 20 miles. The men on board had to take the curvature of the Earth into account to hit their targets. How could hit their targets if the "assumption" was faulty? And if it was a hoax why would the Navy go to that much trouble to develope range finding technology on both sides in the middle of a desperate war?

[@Jacollo]

0:07 In short: No In long: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA no.

[@jameslyddall]

Makes me want to smash my screen to be honest, his voice is so utterly horrible.

[@Jacollo]

To be honest, if not for the laughter and face palms I'm forced to do when Eric speaks, he'd be a nice help with insomnia. That's how boring his voice is!

[@VariantAEC]

8:15 Eric: *NOT ENOUGH ZOOM!!!* Global population: 🤦‍♂️

[@reachandler3655]

Well, Eric immediately showed his intent, speeding up the footage so the NASA lady sounded like a cartoon. 🙄

[@andljoy]

The images where they talk about the "size" of say the US on an image of the earth always makes me laugh. Small..... far away!.

[@eddiebruv]

Like that scene from Father Ted. 🙂

[@andljoy]

@@eddiebruv exactly :D

[@davidwicks6371]

Tell us why you fled to Thailand, Eric...

[@spoodlydoodler3552]

He needs his ladybois