Changes Everything! Scientists Find 400-Million-Solar-Mass DORMANT Black Hole

[@wstavis3135]

Spotting a shadow in a room full of light is not difficult. Spotting a shadow in a dark room is a much better analogy.

[@gunthur696]

@@wstavis3135 your comment logically doesn’t make sense

[@drashokkumar9209]

@@wstavis3135 Great metaphor .

[@CrimsonRayne]

@@gunthur696 that describes space really well

[@Jlmtbtms]

Spot on!

[@jimcabrey9309]

@@gunthur696 why does that make does not make sense would you build the spot of shadow in the dark or in a lighted room what he said makes perfect sense you can’t spot a black hole until it’s actually eating to see these creature disc around it if it’s not actively feeding, you wouldn’t build to see it so what he said makes absolutely perfect sense

[@thomasross4921]

It's electromagnetism. This whole conundrum reminds me of the whole "bumblebees shouldn't be able to fly" thing, where it turns out that they were only counting half of the wing beat because that's the way birds fly. As soon as they counted the entire wing beat, bumblebees fly just fine. It's the same with black holes. Scientists have only been counting the power of gravity, completely discounting electromagnetism, when it's becoming more and more apparent that electromagnetism might even be MORE important than gravity when it comes to the speed of a black hole's feeding.

[@darylbrown8834]

Gravity is one modality of the same thing: electrostatics, so gravity isn't what most' think it is. It is electromagnetic variety.

[@herrweiss2580]

@@darylbrown8834 I just asked Google if gravity is a form of electromagnetism and the answer was NOPE.

[@keyscook]

What is commonly called gravity is a manifestation of one prime law; The Law of Affinity. One disgusting thing about this and many presentation is that the do not say, "Hypothetical dark matter / energy..." as these are simply terms / placeholders for their ignorance.

[@thomasross4921]

@@darylbrown8834 I want whatever you're smoking.

[@thomasross4921]

@@keyscook Citation?

[@ggabriel3d]

I don't want to hear "This Changes Everything" again, thanks. 🤷‍♂

[@ChaosAttractor13]

We have 14 billion years of visible history to try to figure out. It’s going to take a while to figure everything out while stuck on a dust particle. We barely know anything. Keep science-ing.

[@MrSilvertech]

@@ChaosAttractor13 don't forget you are talking about a civilization that can't figure out what a woman is 🤣

[@IsabellaIsabella-mc1tx]

Very interesting. Thanks so much. ❤❤❤

[@tonib5899]

I’m pretty sure their is a theory called ‘direct collapse’ which predicts that big enough gas clouds in the early universe could lead to some extremely massive black holes. I just cannot remember who wrote it and when.

[@ronaldkemp3952]

I published a paperback book *SECRET UNIVERSE : GRAVITY BY RON KEMP* in 2021, 3 months before the JWST was launched and wrote how the JWST would find old, fully grown galaxies, some larger than our own galaxy further than a light distance of 13.8 billion light years. I accurately predicted old, massive galaxies in the early universe. I then went on to explain using current theories and laws of physics to explain how I came to such a wild prediction at the time when astronomers assumed the telescope would find young, dim, diffuse galaxies containing young population 3 stars. Instead the telescope discovered galaxies with red giants, which take a minimum of 10 billion years to form and supermassive black holes 100 times larger than the one in the center of our own galaxy. Astronomers and astrophysicists are confused? Hmm, why were they not able to accurately predict them? I didn't assume distant universe would be any different than the universe in our own neighborhood like them. The solution was easy once you understand quantum field theory and entanglement of light. Simply put, telescopes can't see into the past like they all assumed. Old, fully mature galaxies further than 14 billion light years away will prove their interpretations of general relativity to be wrong. The new Nancy Grace Roman telescope soon to be launched will confirm what I predicted in my book. I know exactly what's wrong with their interpretations of general relativity and quantum field theory. Will they figure it out on their own? I highly doubt it.

[@P00K13__0]

@@ronaldkemp3952 you should publish this information on your channel

[@calvingrondahl1011]

Good for you Einstein! Go claim your Nobel Prize. 🖖👍

[@ronaldkemp3952]

@@calvingrondahl1011 Jealous?

[@ronaldkemp3952]

@@P00K13__0 One of these days.

[@punkypinko2965]

@@calvingrondahl1011 That's a strange comment. If I had published the same, I would certainly leave a comment saying so. You wouldn't? And if you're implying he's lying, that seems ridiculous. Go read his book first. Or he's just trolling, then say so. Anyway, I'm tired of typing ...

[@virgiliustancu9293]

One explanation is that our theories are totally wrong. The idea that Big Bang started in nothing maybe is wrong. Maybe Big Bang is a phenomenon inside a bigger Universe already there. The distances are so big that we can't see what is around.

[@jm131719]

Well done and quite interesting. Here's a silly question: Do black holes also eat dark matter in addition to normal baryonic matter? If tey do, does it have yo obey the Eddington Limit? Does this even make any difference? Just curious/

[@technoSphere-o1o]

Thanks for 300 subscribers❤❤

[@davidsault9698]

I suggest that the massive Black Holes came about at the moment of creation due to there being spots of intense energy on the sphere of the expanding Universe. That intense concentration of energy created a massive amount of matter that immediately collapsed into a Black Hole. Spots on the very early expanding Universe with little energy created little to no matter and are responsible for the great voids we see in the Universe today.

[@LaMafiaSonVergas]

plausible explanation but it implies that the blast of the big bang was not uniform energetically as you imply it was geometrically. while this seems improbable to the untrained eye that focuses only on todays physics it is actually quite probable considering that the vacuum that we observe in space today only exists because the universe is still expanding but outside of our expanding universe the laws of physics as we know them no longer apply and so the vacuum necessary for perfect distribution of energy and even for perfect geométrics of the blast did not exist before the blast itself making your theory one well worth further exploration. bravo for thinking outside the box, i’m impressed.

[@davidsault9698]

@@LaMafiaSonVergas Thank you.

[@jessedbrown1980]

The suoer eddington limit was passed in recent observations as well- This means they are not singularities, they are finite

[@GaussianEntity]

I wonder if this thing can be a candidate for a black hole star. Not too sure on the physics of objects like that but it would make sense if it blew away any material from it during the star phase, then once the black hole portion consumed the star, nothing else was left to consume, leaving it dormant.

[@LeviHeatonIII]

You should have spent the beginning of the video explaining wth a dormant black hole is.

[@darrynfisher9964]

@LeviHeatonIII it's already swallowed everything in it's vicinity and so there's no observable accretion disc or subsequent hawking radiation being released

[@BlackSatinSheets]

@LeviHeatonIII i would imagen a black hole is as one would think crushing gravity into smaller tighter dimensions. A dormant black hole i would think that a black hole has finally slowed down in its eating as they begin to demenish they stop pulling in material. With the further loss of gravitational pull and eventually become dormant until enough material at once comes in contact with it. Restarts the engines if you will.

[@jaymxu]

​@@BlackSatinSheetsBlack holes don't crush gravity, and they don't pull in material. You got a completely wrong notion of spacetime. And your explanation is kinda true and kinda false. It isn't losing any gravity what so ever by being dormant, hawking radiation is so small, it takes billions of years for them to even slightly differ, plus that radiation is still in the vicinity so even if it's not directly inside of it, it's around and thus the region still acts the exact same as if it never did anything. And that still has nothing to do with it being dormant. The dormancy is simply when it's not accreting any matter, which means they ain't releasing any gamma or x-rays which means they're completely invisible from a large distance on any scale of the electromagnetic spectrum.

[@jimstark1810]

This will explain "dark matter" We have no idea how many of these there are.

[@senthilkumar-vb4jy]

For simple example defining blackhole is when lightnis passed to a narrow tube then light travels in its edges and passes out into darkness that's the work of blackholes when light passes through other galaxies recieves it

[@Cerbera66]

Thanks 😊🌌

[@xyzxyzxyzxyz636]

AGI? All good, but you made a boo-boo. GAIA bh3 resides in Milky Way, 13.8 billions years after Big Bang? Please, make the correction for all of us. Thank you!

[@larryswinford3472]

Besides that Eddington may be wrong, that small galaxy was once considerably bigger at a time before.

[@Eric-Marsh]

Is there an upper limit on the size of primordial BHs?

[@gilsonfelix3415]

Forever and always fascinating, be sure.

[@jaapongeveer6203]

The statement that "This changes Everything" seems to only change one thing for consideration. That is, the theory of the formation of black holes. The other side of the coin namely "Big Bang" wasn't considered at all. For example, how possibly does the fact of such a large black hole so "early" in the formation of the universe impact the theory of "Big Bang"? Has the universe always existed? Is the CMB the result of red shift being shifted into the microwave end of the spectrum by the universe outside of our viewing ability? Remember to the ancients the sun looks like it circles the Earth. It depends on what can be seen!

[@jonhenke1504]

Does this mean this particular black hole is full now??

[@gopherchucksgamingnstuff2263]

Bad analogy. More like finding a dark spot in an unlit room. If there was a shadow in a lit room it would stand out like Boötes Void

[@ablebaker8664]

Scenario: a black hole forms within a stellar nursery. Stars form in it's vicinity and binary and greater systems emerge with some members colliding and causing premature supernovii. The radiation pressure escalates star formation in the nursery and corrals the stellar gas and dust into even denser regions of star formation. Supermassive stars form with very short lives followed by yet more supernovii. A gravitationally bound cluster of neutron stars, and midrange black holes accumulates and each begins to spiral into a central locus by losing velocity to the many gravitationally bound stars in the cluster. Rather than accreting just gas and dust, one or two begin accreting neutron stars ans smaller black holes... which don't demonstrate the same repulsion by radiation pressure and don't eject each other by magnetic interactions with the accretion disk. Smaller black holes could fall into a central black hole and drag their own accretion material in with them, force feeding the central black hole. This would require a very dense starting nursery but it could essentially eat a donut hole out of a galaxy without disturbing the rest of the galaxy much.

[@adr3ns]

I'm holding out for the next satalite to extend the draw distance.

[@alvinbanks]

What is its name and location?

[@gopherchucksgamingnstuff2263]

I had no idea a "dormant" black hole could exist.

[@daytradersanonymous9955]

It cannot.

[@MrSilvertech]

​@@daytradersanonymous9955 why Dr. Tell us your wisdom

[@MrSilvertech]

Have to run out of things to eat up eventually

[@davidl9232]

Could it be a void? Is it that a second black hole came in range of yanking it into contact. Would the 2nd black hole gobble it up? Should it be the 2nd was above some minimum size?

[@jeffreyluciana8711]

KZbin graphics are not reality

[@MrSilvertech]

@@jeffreyluciana8711 WHAT???

[@Defme374]

My opinion is that we don’t know nearly enough about black holes to even properly classify them. Talking about theoretical limits, dormant or not, where they come from, when in reality we are barely capable of detecting their existence. I get that we are doing our best with the data we have, but let’s just have some humility and skepticism regarding our conjectures about some of this stuff. People are way too invested in some of these ideas.

[@JamesKonzek-xr5zy]

Why do black holes hibernate?

[@dirtyharry53-vo4id]

Couldn´t this be a hint that Penrose ist right about CCC?

[@WardDoering]

GAAAH!!?

[@simonprice4810]

Dormant just means it isn't feeding ,gravity doesn't make it active otherwise there would be no such thing as a dormant volcano as even dormant ones still exert gravity

[@starman2337]

Wouldn't dark matter black holes be able to form quickly without outward radiation pressure slowing down contraction?

[@neiljohnson6815]

So exactly what. has been changed?

[@bradlyferrell9122]

Basically, finding new things and creating new theories only proves we know very little. And those little things WILL change the more we "learn". Such is the basis of our science. NEVER assume a position of knowing based on a theory born of newly discovered information! Its all exciting, but it is rarely fact. Patience is required for true enlightenment...faith is required for Truth. Open minds receive Truth...not scientific minds. Happy New Year humans!!!

[@lean_sumek]

Amazing 😍🥰🤣

[@celestelisekarn176]

If more Nebula's are forming thats an overwhelming amount of subliminals you guys!

[@erdngtn9942]

You’ll find me skeptical. I have good logic and I was more often right ie string theory and especially now DARK MATTER/ energy as everyone talking how it might be time and not matter that causes what we detect.

[@snowtu8168]

Before the big bang, wasn't the extent of the universe just one big black hole? And if there was a big bang, wouldn't chunks of the original black holes be ejected into the Universe?

[@Ancientalienshistory]

The timeline of black hole formation suggests that massive black holes could exist within a billion years after the Big Bang. This challenges our understanding of cosmic evolution.

[@TubeOnRichard]

Ah yes a dormant black hole, I get it, gravity only gravitates while the black hole is awake. I sure hope it isn't grumpy!

[@IamPreacherMan]

My assumption is, the universe emerged from a single blackhole. I assume it was in a state of flux when it was fractured and initial inflation began before the “big bang.” I also would assume there would be primordial blackholes which emerged from this plasma, soupy mess.

[@MrSilvertech]

Our universe would be made from one of those jets of plasma shooting out of it, that would be the "big Bang"

[@senthilkumar-vb4jy]

Blackholes are the whole source of light energy that receives and sends its energy to the universe in darkness with gravity and electro magnetic forces using its disks

[@stevestovall9901]

Every time humans discover something new about the universe, we discover we only think we know about the universe

[@jayjohn9680]

Isn’t it something when every Tom, Dick, and Harry gets to comment on this mind boggling discovery. True everyone is entitled to their opinion yet Im sensing they got tons of data they went through for who knows how many hours before even starting to begin their opinions on this finding.

[@bg-se7rq]

My dog is chasing his shadow in my day room 🐕

[@GamesBond.007]

1:10 How do black holes emmit all that energy, if nothing can escape from a black hole, not even light ?????

[@donthesitatebegin9283]

The energy is emitted from matter circling the event horizon, not from the Black Hole.

[@GamesBond.007]

​​@@donthesitatebegin9283except those jets seem to come straight from the black hole which is in the center of the accretion disk

[@donthesitatebegin9283]

@@GamesBond.007 That's a simulation. In reality the jets would form above/outside the Black Hole. The physics involved are so extreme it is hard to even visualise what might be happening, but we know that nothing escapes the Black Hole.

[@GaussianEntity]

​@@GamesBond.007 The jets come from matter being flung from the black hole at near light speeds. Imagine one of those spinning rides at a theme park that spin around fast enough to feel like you'll fly off if it went fast enough. Black holes do this sort of thing with its tremendous gravitational influence.

[@JEFFwasHERE...]

JEFF was HERE 🕳️

[@Delia-dk5gy]

we live in a crazy stupendously infinite dot-matrix

[@AARPDude]

Perhaps Black Holes leaks off Dark Energy as time goes by...

[@scottglover4025]

Speculatipn is the enemy of calm.

[@dronegirl7539]

Wouldn't the mass of a black hole also increase by consuming trillions of gravitons per second by ripping them right out of spacetime? Is that even a possibility?

[@WarrenPeace007]

Maybe the universe is much older than we think

[@sephdm]

What if it's a remnant of a previous incarnation of the universe.

[@TomCrockett-bl1gp]

You know, turkey dinner on Thanksgiving and watching the game.😂

[@wearehear982]

Did y'all know a chicken will lay an egg, defecate and urinate; all from the same hole

[@celestelisekarn176]

This was another Simpson's prediction that really happened now.

[@3motivationmoments]

This is a game-changer! A dormant black hole that massive could reveal new insights into dark matter and gravity.

[@dudleyvasausage7879]

@3curiosityunlocked dark matter hasnt been proven.

[@christophergetty1719]

Now there a study that says the universe is around 27 billion years ol not 14 billion years old. So redo the math on this black hole it may not be from the beginning after all

[@JuanCarrero-ok3nx]

How can we observe something if it's hundreds or thousands of light years away riddle me that batman 😂

[@gilsonfelix3415]

@@JuanCarrero-ok3nx OMG!!! Have you ever heard about light spectrum? Or just even about light? About James web telescope? 🙄

[@DonaldKronos]

X times the mass of something does not imply x times the diameter of that same thing. Earth's local star, the sun, does not have the density of a black hole. If it did, it would have a much smaller diameter with the same mass. I understand what you mean by dormant as essentially saying that there doesn't seem to be a bunch of mass orbiting near the Event Horizon, but technically the black hole itself would be no more or less dormant either way. However, you really can't just take a mass ratio and convert it to a diameter ratio when you're talking about things of different densities.

[@MrSilvertech]

Nobody said there was a direct ratio of size to mass. And the term dormant literally means nothing is being sucked into it right now, that's all

[@D3athW1ng]

👀 So, the itis?

[@byrgesen6633]

Music video😢

[@rickdelagarza4ever]

So, how does a blackhole go dormant? What am I missing? Did Hawkins, Sagan, or Einstein predict this?

[@rickdelagarza4ever]

Wouldn't this just mean that it consumed all the surrounding cosmo objects in it's immediate vicinity, as of now? Again, what am I missing?

[@Flesh_Wizard]

It means the disc stopped emitting as much light, suggesting a lack of more mass to accrete

[@flyingdutchmanindustries5877]

They are NOT holes! Black Mass would be a more accurate name. With most of the 'space' removed (actually dispalced) from between particles, these super-dense masses are more like a planet than a hole. Ok, so it's a misnomer. How about that dum 'event horizon' thing?!? Does no one understand? If ANY mass is gathered after initial collapse, it would ALL have to gather at the perifery of the Black Mass, at the event horizon, because if time slows to infinity, then NOTHING would reach past the threshold of the event horizon. If that is the case, then all gathered mass would accumulate there, at the outside of the diameter of the Black Mass. That should exponentially either slow it's spin, or increase the spin to either an imperceptible movement, or spin up to an actually impossible speed. Either way, we would DEFINITELY see the effect - IMMEDIATELY!!! No one, not one person has reported any such thing. The whole 'Event Horizon' thing is a scam. It's a lie. I would say it was necessary if time slows down or speeds up, because of the massive gravity/space/mass/time thing, but that is a scam also. Time does not speed up or slow down.

[@MikeKessock]

It’s the Newtonian principle of entropy decay paired with Electromagnetic expansion. The Flux Capacitor on the Webb telescope causes interference in the observation of this phenomenon and highly exaggerates the size of Black Holes Also, the Parallax Law of Compaction tells us that us that Black Holes speed up for a time that is inversely related to its mass in the 1st million years of their creation

[@Darksideeyes]

Натрупала е маса много бързо за някакъв период от време след т. нар. Big bang,после е останала латентна......🤔🤨

[@painmt651]

Time is not constant, nor is the speed of light. There are errors in the current cosmological models. I wish I knew the questions that would lead to a fuller understanding of what is.

[@headcheesefry]

Maybe it's a black hole from a previous big bang.

[@JD-ev1uj]

The math doesn't hold up. For us to live we need a language. That language is code. That code is a massive intelligent code. Not to mention all the other fine tuning for life. The math doesn't hold what your scientists extrapolate. And you know it.

[@PrestonedTucson]

Funny how I used recursion theory to solve UFT U = G(x,t)+Q(x,t)+E(x,t) + M(x,t) this is simplified version ; Gravity ,Quantum , Electromagnetic , Matter energy contribution. Pushed against real data , sigma 5 all day.

[@JoseMorales-hv5yc]

Black hole are not made from dying Star ⭐✨. Every black hole we see is Another getaway to another Univers .

[@MrSilvertech]

And how do you know that a star dying doesn't open up a hole to another universe ?

[@DCGreenZone]

Scientists find large plasmoid, don't recognize it.

[@aaronmicalowe]

It changes nothing. A black hole's observed behaviour is determined by its environment which varies. The environment of a black hole is independent and changes over time. We are always putting effect before cause and have forgotten reality.

[@1080KaTa]

བུ་ག་ནག་པོ་འདི་འཕྲུལ་་འཁོར་ཞིག་ཡིན་པས😮 Is this black hole a magic machine?😮

[@GlennSzarko]

Lets go with..'what if' ...stars aren't the only force that can stimulate a singularity..lol

[@tweaker1bms]

It's all just mass squeezed down tight enough, stars or not.

[@7mustardseedc]

It's said that there are more Stars in the Universe than there is Sand On The Earth

[@bettyg7710]

Um, do you remember the Big Bang theory went boom! As in not plausible any more thanks to the JWT. Hello McFly is anyone home!

[@ernestsmith3581]

Just when Schrodinger's cat either dies or doesn't, a dormant black hole is either detected or isn't. Pretty much tells one the speculative nature of bleeding edge physics and cosmology, doesn't it?

[@honestspirit56]

Yeah, it’s a planet killing monster.

[@LocomotiveThought]

Laws of Physics are loading Error 404 Shutting down ...

[@mobilefreedom741]

It never dormant???.. 😒 wtf... energy is still there

[@MrSilvertech]

@@mobilefreedom741 dormant as in inactive, as in not currently feeding

[@mrazyone]

Speculation. Man has no idea

[@Sirbadone]

I cant help but critique these AI videos. This one literally begins repeating itself on and off until the halfway point where everything gets repeated like a 9th grade five paragraph essay.

[@gbsailing9436]

How can such a massive gravitational body be dormant? It's physically impossible! IF it is so massive (you say it's 400M times the mass of our Sun) then by sheer physics it must be attracting other matter. Therefore it can NOT be dormant...it may not be behaving like other Black holes, but there is NO WAY it is dormant.

[@brutusl2786]

It’s a black hole made of dark matter.

[@JoseMorales-hv5yc]

This Black 🕳️ hole is not just a Black hole,this black hole you call it Dormant. Well this one is more Dimensions , this dormant Black hole is a Doorway to another part of the Universe . 😮😢😅

[@Captndarty]

Changes nothing🥱

[@LeviHeatonIII]

Wth is a dormant black hole? If it isn't a crushing gravity, it isn't a black hole. If it is a crushing gravity, it isn't dormant.

[@P_H_O_N_K_R_A_D_I_O]

Nah dude... what if black holes compact light enough over the centuries them things cause like another big bang or some sht.

[@P_H_O_N_K_R_A_D_I_O]

Like imagine it like overcharging a battery or somethin. And you gotta think there's like trillions of galaxies with light to be absorbed over time and like rich dense sources like neutron stars to be absorbed is gotta be like packin gunpowder in a musket

[@darrynfisher9964]

Wrong

[@connercalhoun3084]

Dormant simply refers to The fact of whether or not it’s actively accreting matter.

[@Thehiddenleafsaiyan]

@P_H_O_N_K_R_A_D_I_O we don't know much about the universe, so I'm not counting this out. We don't know where the Big Bang came from it may have been from something similar. We just know it was everywhere, but there's no certain point where you can say hey this is where it all started." That's why I, personally , believe in God. I think God made his move. Something can't come from nothing, but something came from nothing, and there's no certain point to tell where it happened. It just happened. Like God, he's everywhere.

[@JAYDELROSARIO-l5t]

WHOLE WIDHT WHORLED WRANGLEY WEK😊BRANGER MECBLANGLEY

[@sulatkamay1832]

After the big bang? What a joke theory😂

[@Wanda-l7v]

It tells us how big God is!

[@daytradersanonymous9955]

"Dormant blackhole" is the dumbest thing ive seen today. Congrats.

[@Tm-eg2lx]

Scientists knows so little about space,then everything they thought they knew,changes every time the find something new. OOPS! Seems to be cosmological scientists favourite word

[@bmiller949]

So much mass... it's like being Catholic.

[@kwaki-serpi-niku]

There are no such things as black holes. These figments of modern-day science's imagination need to be put to rest.

[@BruceWayneAnderson6685]

Ok as much as I love science and what we have learned from JWST, we truly need to understand that the whole idea of dark matter, dark energy and black holes are not real or proven. Do we all not remember that space is infinite and has no end. Here we are trying to say that we are looking at the beginning of the universe???? When did infinite get an beginning or an end?? Black holes were a singularity, now they are in the center of all galaxies??? With no answers to what is out there and how it truly works we need to look in a different way to figure it out.

[@JamesBond-t9u6p]

Hey WHY DID YOU FAKE A SPHERE? THAT'S NOT A HOLE MOVES OR FLOWS DON'T FIT YOU HAVE NO CLUE ABout SIMPLE BASICS #nasa #hollywood #emmawatson #tomcruise #margotrobbie THERE never been 3 KINGS Girls on a Key