Very amazing and futuristic ship, I think one of the most advanced in the world in terms of systems.
@asywaliezzatosman2534 Жыл бұрын
MasyaAllah...The Italian were out of the box in designing the ship, the ship concept and also the system and the weaponry. Although the Italian building the modern advance futuristic ship, they still maintain the sexiness and soul of the ship.
@ElderSwamp Жыл бұрын
At the end "..to let see those countryes how Italians do ships." 😍👏👏🇮🇹 With the most innovative naval concept Italians are leading again the world into the future. 🇮🇹🇮🇹🇮🇹
@ElToronski Жыл бұрын
The italians really knows how to make beautiful and powerful warships
@sywu4714 Жыл бұрын
Or luxury yachts
@giacomochessa9391 Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot😊
@milocabral7428 Жыл бұрын
They have been at it for a few hundred years lmao
@alexprato4356 Жыл бұрын
Ehhmmm no
@giacomochessa9391 Жыл бұрын
@@alexprato4356 maybe you?
@cosmic1518 Жыл бұрын
Another exelent ship from Fincantieri for the italian navy!
@Terryray123 Жыл бұрын
I hope they build better ships for Italian navy than the US LCS program.
@valerianocuomo996 Жыл бұрын
Leadership in the world, also Leonardo, missilistic sistems, radar,sonar,elettronic, cannon oto melara. All made in italy only the TANK mmmh ariete,but ever made in italy...important for now out
@ivanomontanarella2335 Жыл бұрын
LCS is a Lokeed Martin project, Fincantieri is builder only
@cirONE65 Жыл бұрын
fincantieri bought marinette marine when lcs were being built by Lockheed and MM. for the hull they chose the project holder of the "destriero" yacht holder of the blue ribbon, so if both suck for the armament and sensors it is certainly not Fincantieri's fault, and it is the Australian hull that has problems with aluminum. an overrated WW1 57mm pea shooter instead of a 76mm cannon, which is very well used by Israel. Hellfire missiles instead of nssm or SM2/3 I challenge anyone to do better. unfortunately you are the nation of lobbies, and this is the real flaw of the united states
@lucianorosarelli-xr5lr Жыл бұрын
@@Terryray123 lcs contellation? built of freem built from fincantieri marinette?
@rodrigoeberhart Жыл бұрын
Fantastic warship ! Congrats Italy Navy !!! Força Italia !
@dmaverick9525 Жыл бұрын
Give it the Italians. They do not just build ships, they design them with elegance.
@1zanglang Жыл бұрын
This ship is a big step forward. Apart from the revolutionary cockpit, the modularity is just amazing. Removable davits, and crane, that impresive hangar, are making this platform extremely versatile. Actually, this ship can be configured in a very short period of time, to any type of mission. The electric propulsion facilitates even MCM ops. This kind of ships are needed for small navies which can't afford to keep too many classes of specialized warships.
@giacintoboccia9386 Жыл бұрын
The PPA may be what the LCS should have been.
@CheapSushi Жыл бұрын
@@giacintoboccia9386 100% What a total disaster and huge money pit the LCS program has been.
@danielefabbro822 Жыл бұрын
@@giacintoboccia9386 it is indeed. Their role is almost the same.
@matteobardella6634 Жыл бұрын
Noi cm Italia siamo tra le top 10 potenze militari del mondo !! Soprattutto come marina ed aeronautica!
@nasigorengpecelesteh1506 Жыл бұрын
Ya inovasi design interior yang hebat
@philchristmas4071 Жыл бұрын
Very well armed and beautiful ship by our Italian ally. 🇺🇸🤝🇮🇹
@alpha5449 Жыл бұрын
Not really. The light version canot be multi purpose because lacks armaments. The full version barely carry the minimum armaments for Anti surface AA ASW. The task of PPAs could be at maximum patroling brown waters or going to show off around the world.
@claudioros3505 Жыл бұрын
@@alpha5449 you are wrong sir!😁 Patrolling "brown waters" with a 6.000 tons ship? How can you do that? The "Morosini" Is in "light" configuration, but will be upgraded soon with a more capable radar, aster 15/30 mbda's missiles, torpedos and so on (uav, uuv...).
@randomwalk5095 Жыл бұрын
@@alpha5449 light version like like+ are ready to be modified in full version
@fv7281 Жыл бұрын
As an italian we are your colony not ally😅😓
@claudiobangrazi6977 Жыл бұрын
We are not ally we are servant!!! You have many many basis here in Italiy and in Europe (navy, air forces, army, marines etc,). I don`t see basis of ours carabinieri, army, navy or air force in the USA. And we are compelled from the USA and NATO to give weapons to the Ukraine against art. 11 of our Constitution!!!
@denault3985 Жыл бұрын
The displays remind me of an Airbus A350 cockpit. This patrol craft is simply futuristic.
@Ezekiel9038 ай бұрын
they are now working with the French for a new Container capable to fire missiles!
@FormerIRSspy Жыл бұрын
Yeah, "patrol ship", in maximum configuration this thing armed better than some of the frigates
@ragnaarlobrok2543 Жыл бұрын
not missile
@claudioros3505 Жыл бұрын
@@ragnaarlobrok2543 aster 15 and 30...the light version will be integrated very soon.
@Goose852 Жыл бұрын
@@ragnaarlobrok2543 Aster 30 and MK2 evo
@valerianocuomo996 Жыл бұрын
@@ragnaarlobrok2543 is full of missil, 3 version: ligth, ligth plus,full,but in case of war,the ligth, now less,trasform all in full: 16 cell + 8 range 20km and 120km, Teseo mk2 EVO STEALT: 350km of range, silurs anti submarine ,cannon 127 60 COMPAT SUPER RAPID, with the VULCANO: artiglieria 120km!!! With GPS, is incredible, otomelara build cannons with range identik at missil of 1 milion of euro,VULCANO cost only 8000euro, all high tech made in italy, THEY ARE PATRIOLS, BUT THE FULL and ligth plus ,fregate,italian navy: all full,cause Russia war,turkey, egipt, others med countrys, they have armys powerful now,
@valerianocuomo996 Жыл бұрын
@@claudioros3505 teseo mk2evo...350km Antiship, also for attack on land
@PrimarchX Жыл бұрын
I've come to really respect the Italian military. They have a singular vision with regard to their defense and role within NATO. Better yet, they make beautiful ships.
@propsboy Жыл бұрын
OMG that's probably the most beautiful ship I've ever seen 💚🤍❤ respect from NZ 🖤🤍
@___FRANCESCO___ Жыл бұрын
I think the same, thank you :)
@rodneymiddleton1044 Жыл бұрын
Very impressive modern ship
@quekvincent5981 Жыл бұрын
Beautiful & very advanced cockpit
@magneticstorm1 Жыл бұрын
Forza Italia!🇮🇹🇮🇹🇺🇲🇺🇲
@quercus5398 Жыл бұрын
The Italian navy is modern and pretty much complete,being a peninsula stretched in the Mediterranean the navy has to be more than capable to defend it’s shores, the air support is also well equipped and modern!
@CheapSushi Жыл бұрын
Wow, just wow. This is getting to the Star Trek or Sci-Fi level of a bridge & CIC. I love that the Italians still put up multiple guns too. Awesome design. Very well thought out. I would love to see the Italians make a new Destroyer for us. I am very happy that they are building our Frigates also.
@lucaiervasi8515 Жыл бұрын
After the entry into service of the new Orizzonte-class destroyers in the Italian Navy in the second half of the 2000s, the Italian Ministry of Defense decided to replace the Luigi Duran De La Penne-class destroyers and commissioned Fincantieri to design a new type of destroyer. we still know very little about this new class. the little information circulating says that they will be between 175/185 meters long, have a displacement of 11/12,000 tons and will carry 2 helicopters between augustawestland aw101 and nh90. these units are expected to enter service in 2030/35, but the war in ukraine has prompted the ministry to accelerate all ongoing programmes. obviously Italy does not have the budget of the United States, so every single cent must be spent in a targeted way, reducing waste to a minimum. but lately france and another unspecified country have shown interest in the ddx program, this will allow development and design costs to be spread across multiple units and could give greater impetus to the entire program. Luigi Duran De La Penne class. kzbin.info/www/bejne/mZnXe2iXnNmBos0 . Orizzonte class. kzbin.info/www/bejne/kGqanqR_pJl6oZI . DDX class. kzbin.info/www/bejne/j3LWqp1thq9gj9U
@CheapSushi Жыл бұрын
@@lucaiervasi8515 Thank you for the information! I wish a lot of success to these programs. Very cool!
@neutronalchemist3241 Жыл бұрын
The 127mm main gun with Vulcano extended range guided ammos is the weapon the class had been designed around. It's practically a 32 RPM, 90km range (120km with the incoming block "C"), missile launcher.
@lucaiervasi8515 Жыл бұрын
@@CheapSushi thanks bro
@lucaiervasi8515 Жыл бұрын
@@met71metaldetector55 i primi battelli italiani a utilizzare i missili da crociera a lungo raggio saranno i nuovi sottomarini U212NFS, che inizieranno a prendere servizio dal 2027. Successivamente tutte le fremm verranno dotate dello stesso sistema d'arma. Quando i caccia ddx entreranno in servizio, la marina avrà già parecchie unità dotate di tali apparati. Ma siamo in Italia, quí i governi cadono più velocemente di un bambino che inizia a muovere i primi passi e anche se lo stato maggiore della Marina ha approvato il tutto, l'ultima parola spetta al parlamento.
@lutfiannathaniel08228 ай бұрын
thankyou Italia, now we indonesian are so proud to have this warship as our new power
@felcofb4750 Жыл бұрын
Italian Genius as usual. Very useful, very cost effettive and very advanced. The full and heavy configuration is clearly a frigate, as the light a light frigate, I am tired of the downgrading the class of a vassel just for political reasons...
@alpha5449 Жыл бұрын
Yes typical italian problem downgraded ships and imposed dual use to us warship as aid ships.
@ragnaarlobrok2543 Жыл бұрын
@@alpha5449 BINGO !!!
@randomwalk5095 Жыл бұрын
@@alpha5449 yeah this is due by budget problems
@massimobernardo- Жыл бұрын
@@randomwalk5095 all PPAs will be configured in full version, after the recent war scenarios.
@valerianocuomo996 Жыл бұрын
@@alpha5449 all full in case of war,a full is very most powerful of a type UK, also helicopter made in italy there is the true superiority, engineering top in europe,france cry
@Jon.A.Scholt Жыл бұрын
Not only do the Italians make beautiful ships, they give the systems on their ships awesome names. "Vulcano", "Athena", "Kronos". Apparently those in the Italian Navy are fans of antiquity.
@claudioros350512 күн бұрын
...You mean proud of history...
@nicholaosperackis7390 Жыл бұрын
W la Marina!
@davidegiacomini50518 ай бұрын
the Italian navy for history and for its current fleet is among the first in the world.
@CesarGonzalez-vq2mm Жыл бұрын
Italia, la gran potencia maritima escondida❤😮
@alexkiros4130 Жыл бұрын
La de España tendría que ser como mínimo igual.
@andrewseo1891 Жыл бұрын
Give credit to the Italians for designing a ship’s helm to resemble the steering wheel of a Formula 1 racing car.
@cirONE65 Жыл бұрын
for both road cars and formula one cars it was Ferrari who introduced steering with multi-purpose controls
@jesusdiaz3776 Жыл бұрын
This is what LCS supposed to be!
@1zanglang Жыл бұрын
Yes, but apart from LCS, this one is not built by thieves...
@emilianocaprili4160 Жыл бұрын
Well, this ship is built by Fincantieri, the same company which has created the FREMM/Constellation Class frigates…
@Italian_Military_Archives Жыл бұрын
Fantastic ship!
@christophersnyder1532 Жыл бұрын
This is a pretty amazing looking warship, it also reminds me of the Japan Maritime Self Defence Force's modern Akizuki class destroyer. I hope there are plenty more to come. Take care, and all the best.
@lucaiervasi8515 Жыл бұрын
the plan provides for the construction of 16 units for the Italian navy, but at the moment only 7 have been financed. divided into 2 Light: light version, suitable for coastal patrolling and combating crime at sea, 3 Light+: medium version, suitable for both coastal patrol and support and combat, 2 Full: heavy version, suitable for front line combat. the displacement varies from 4600 tons of the Light version (the one featured in this video and a light variant) to 6300 tons in Full configuration. all the variants have been designed to be brought to the full version, without making structural changes and in a short time. substantially all the units are already prepared from birth. the war in ukraine prompted the italian ministry of defense to evaluate the possibility of bringing all units to the full version. the p430 Paolo Thaon di Revel and the p431 Francesco Morosini are already in service and are both light. the p432 Raimondo Montecuccoli, will be delivered to the navy in June, and is a light+ version, the p434 Giovanni delle Bande Nere, is carrying out sea trials and will be delivered in 2024, this one and already in full configuration. also in 2024 the p433 Marcantonio Colonna will be delivered, which is in the light+ version. the other 2 have not yet been launched and in the original plans the p435 Ruggiero di Lauria is a light+ variant, while the p436 Domenico Millelire is a full version. but it seems that the p435 hull will also be launched in a full version. both units will be delivered in 2026
@christophersnyder1532 Жыл бұрын
@Luca Iervasi Thank's for your very informative reply. Take care, and all the best.
@DarthVader11-28 ай бұрын
I heard that Indonesia has purchased 2 units of this ship
@watermirror Жыл бұрын
Glides like a zumwalt but retaining the usual bow. That's the only feature that caught my attention before, until the previous NavalNews interview came & this full interview. Love the engine config (finally heared it, we can just mention PPA as reference), perfect for high-speed (35kn, maybe 40kn) assault OPVs (~3000t & below) without TASS but has keel sonar; & for interceptor coastguard OPVs. And those 4 faces 1:06 directly above the horizontal octagon. And of course sovraponte
@fee1776 Жыл бұрын
Would love to see a plastic scale model kit for this class ship. Has unique ship architect that is beautiful and yet deadly.
@Frank-pc2rs Жыл бұрын
Viva Italia!
@jamieshields9521 Жыл бұрын
Thanks Naval News with more in depth of PPA, it would be interesting to see what USN will borrow from PPA design with FFGX Constellation class.
@paultanton4307 Жыл бұрын
Not likely to carry much over - the FREMM design has been worked over thoroughly to end up with the FFGX,different class of ship to the PPA.
@valerianocuomo996 Жыл бұрын
@@paultanton4307 full ppa they have a powerful Aldo most of the british type ,ships of shit. Is a pathehic country the England, has lose all national industry, italy acquisided helicopters industry, rails high speed, also Germany, france, china, small isla ,a dog of the America, in Afganistan and Iraq only war in 3rt world...like win easy
@MusicStoreHouseMircoSorrentino Жыл бұрын
looks like a spaceship
@sorasakkertpong8296 Жыл бұрын
awesome
@frednoname371411 ай бұрын
🇫🇷 very happy to coop with ITALIA !! .. FREMM. FDI. Looks like NAVALGROUP+ FICANTIERI works fine. Lots laugth at Italy they forget this country has nice knowledge in all kinds of ships, helicopters etc... as french we should coop more with italians. When you think that FICANTIERI is building the new U.S "constellation" class fregates... that loockeed-martin and general-dynamics missed ( LCS, freedom) class to the bin ...
@intersezioni10 ай бұрын
it was very nice when the French state prevented the purchase of the Atlantic shipyards by the Italian Fincantieri!
@frednoname371410 ай бұрын
@@intersezioni of course it was "national arsenal" but coop is good
@intersezioni10 ай бұрын
@@frednoname3714 it was an unfair choice, Holland's French government had given a positive opinion but then Macron blocked the purchase at the last moment!
@enzobergamaschi846610 ай бұрын
🇨🇵❤🇮🇹👍👌👋
@bernardinourcia3410 Жыл бұрын
This is the ship the Philippines need to acquire 🙏🙏🙏
@oboro115 Жыл бұрын
Very advanced and futuristic ship. I think this ship is much better than other offshore patrol vessel and Frigate. It will be attract South East Asian countries which are Singapore, Indonesia, and Philippine. I’m surprised combined bridge, CIC and communication room at same floor. Is Italian Navy decided clear the damage control in this concept? If that’s all clear very impressed.
@CriscCiaddu Жыл бұрын
Hi sir. In modern warships the CIC are however placed on the same island as the bridge, behind, below or above the bridge (it depends), usually close to the main Radar. Today's ships are not primarily designed to withstand ASuW missile hits(or other generic Cruise missiles), but have evolved their systems to avoid being hit. In case of successful penetration of a warhead even near the bridge/CIC it would be fatal (both for instruments and for the Staff), especially if the missile contains a heavy warhead or if it's a hypersonic missile.
@oboro115 Жыл бұрын
@@CriscCiaddu Thank you your comment. I understand why even during war, main purpose of OPV is monitoring the sea territory of own coastal areas. OPV does not appear the battle field. So the operation of centralized deployment will be efficient and prioritize. Countries that has naval battle experiences in world war 2 had knowledge that important facilities distributed deployment have been done to damage control.
@anezsiregar9584 Жыл бұрын
The Italian indeed offered us Indonesia this class of ship, together with FREMM (Bergamini class). We are currently waiting which one will get chosen.
@JeceryCalimpong Жыл бұрын
Ganda ng tlaga sana ganyan din sa pinas
@MrLet0 Жыл бұрын
Now it's obvious why the US Navy chose the Italian shipyards for it's new FFG(X) program
@solinvictus1234 Жыл бұрын
Not only the shipyard but also the class. The US Constellation class will be an Italian FREMM Lupo Class, modified for the US Navy specs.
@paultanton6721 Жыл бұрын
@@solinvictus1234 The FREMM is the Bergami class, the Lupo was a previous class of Frigate.
@solinvictus1234 Жыл бұрын
@@paultanton6721 Sorry my mistake, the FREMM chosen by US Navy was the Bergamini class called "Alpino" F 594 with ASW capability, not Lupo. You're right on that.
@paultanton6721 Жыл бұрын
@@solinvictus1234 👍
@danielefabbro822 Жыл бұрын
It's important to consider that finally the americans have addressed their need of more sophisticated ships in ASW role. Their carriers are always in danger from submarines. Trials have shown that modern day submarines can effectively sink the US carriers and that is a bad news for the whole NATO. As partners we share security and defendive roles while escorting their carriers here in Europe and now we have shared such capabilities with them kn order to minimize the risks in a real situation. This will greatly benefit our common capabilities of forcing any threat to reconsider the use of force against our nations and allies. 🇮🇹🇺🇲 Togheter we are strong. 😎👍
@Cartoonman154 Жыл бұрын
What a slick bridge.
@rudivandoornegat2371 Жыл бұрын
Very efficient and advanced ship
@StereoSpace Жыл бұрын
Very impressive.
@PSR_Macky Жыл бұрын
I like the cockpit layout on the warship, whoa, kinda first of its kind to utilized such layout concept? it looks very advanced.
@g.dodidarmawan27318 ай бұрын
Very Advanced Technology... Indonesian Will proud for buying these two ships.. ottimo lavoro Italia!🇮🇩♥️🇮🇹
@giuseppinavolpe2873 Жыл бұрын
The light there is fantastic
@giuseppinavolpe2873 Жыл бұрын
Io sempre a casa..why you didnt invite me there?
@graziellabosco8791 Жыл бұрын
Visitato il 18 marzo 2023. Equipaggio molto gentile e disponibile. E’ stata veramente una bella esperienza.
@RudyEsposito-w9q8 ай бұрын
Nice ship,
@economia-italiacom Жыл бұрын
STAR TREK CONTROL PANEL ITALIAN VERSION ❤
@AlessioPenaglia Жыл бұрын
The PPA project is for 7 units. 4 in full configuration and 3 in light+ configuration . The light version of Ppa will be eliminate.
@matteoinghilleri3559 Жыл бұрын
Amazing.
@dieuluimeme9996 Жыл бұрын
Ou en est le Trieste? Une visite bientôt ?
@Jin-cf1xp Жыл бұрын
Je l’ai vu il y a trois jours, le pont d’envol et l’îlot semblent prêt d’extérieur il ne doit rester que les aménagements intérieurs!
@randomwalk5095 Жыл бұрын
... still in preparation
@claudiomannoni5557 Жыл бұрын
training at Sea
@Jin-cf1xp Жыл бұрын
@@claudiomannoni5557 Training ???? Saw it 1 month ago and it was still in dry dock without all the isle completed, it isn’t event commissioned
@claudiomannoni5557 Жыл бұрын
@@Jin-cf1xp one year ago was at Sea kzbin.info/www/bejne/n6iXhJKOptmgZ5I
@lukedogwalker5 ай бұрын
That bridge/cockpit and situation table... it's like something off Star Trek!
@rgeogllo1 Жыл бұрын
Xavier, at the 5:26 mark, after the commander finished explaining his station, you and I said 'Wow' at the same time! What a ship! But what is the deal with that odd bow at the waterline?
@NavalNews Жыл бұрын
Wave piercing bow for speed
@paultanton4307 Жыл бұрын
Ive seen it described as a 'Sawtooth Bow',im no Naval Architect but it is a way of having a greater speed by manipulating the Ship's speed to length ratio.
@nordica-1 Жыл бұрын
操縦室が飛行機みたいでめっちゃかっこいい
@jasonyee6726 Жыл бұрын
Its my pleasure that I could witness this ship when it came to Malaysia 2 weeks ago for maritime exhibition.
@giogio15678 ай бұрын
In fact, the Malaysian government has ordered two of these ships.
@faimontazara72546 ай бұрын
@@giogio1567oh you mean Indonesia, Malaysia neighbour
@mauriziomanservigi400 Жыл бұрын
Se portate tutte alla versione full sono il gioiello della nostra marina... speriamo che estendono il numero di unità sembra un F35 proiettato me mare
@NicolaiVE Жыл бұрын
very beautiful ship. The model of the ship shows a VLS in front of the bridge, but the ship doesn't seem to be equipped with it at the moment. is this an option?
@andreascandellari4730 Жыл бұрын
As explained from 1:03, the PPA can have various configurations. The one in the video is in Light configuration, but can be refitted at any time to become a Light+ or Full configuration, adding VLS and other systems. The next PPAs that will be delivered to the Italian Navy will be in Full version, and it seems that all the PPAs currently in Light configuration will be soon converted into Full ones.
@NicolaiVE Жыл бұрын
@@andreascandellari4730 thanks, I tought it was like a "mission package"
@Goose852 Жыл бұрын
@@NicolaiVE except the VLS, wich will be fitted in the future by penetrating the deck, the other weapon modules can be installed in a few hours
@randomwalk5095 Жыл бұрын
yes it's an option PPA light and PPA + don't have it but they can be changed to Full with 16 VLS cells
@cetto1015 Жыл бұрын
A diamond.
@markrobber5252 Жыл бұрын
What kind of startrek technology is this??
@wooo_gaming8719 Жыл бұрын
Wow very cool 🎉
@micumatrix3 ай бұрын
The captain has all rights to be proud of his ship :)
@AriefBudiman-g3u8 ай бұрын
Thank you for the visit of the Francesco Morisini Warship to Indonesia several months ago. And as a result, the Indonesian Ministry of Defense has signed a contract with the Italian Navy to purchase 2 PPA warships, namely: Marcantonio Colonna (P 433) and Ruggiero di Lauria (P 435) and delivery of phase I will be carried out in October 2024 to Indonesia
@gbsgamingproject74338 ай бұрын
preparing to become part of the Indonesian naval family 🇮🇩❤️🇮🇹
@fabiotriberti916 Жыл бұрын
Mamma mia che bella, sembra la plancia della white base 😊
@alessandrogiannini6415 Жыл бұрын
Maybe one of the most "star trek"-ish military ship around the world 😛
@TSHKKRipper Жыл бұрын
Very interesting ship. Thank you for sharing.
@Alsayid Жыл бұрын
That's a nice looking ship. So, I take it the 25mm gun is for defense against little speedboat type vessels that come in close and swarm? Are there also .50 cal machine mounts for this purpose, like what older frigates had?
@Goose852 Жыл бұрын
Yes
@najmihakim4665 Жыл бұрын
i see this amazing ship at LIMA2023 Langkawi ...
@augustomaramonte9619 Жыл бұрын
Interesting that the surface of the plance it’s like concrete 😊for rcs reduction
@v.d.b9903 Жыл бұрын
This thing looks like a war spaceship not a ligh patrol vessel
@matteobardella6634 Жыл бұрын
Siamo una delle più grandi potenze militari nl mondo e tra le marine più micidiali!!!!
@dantedigirolamo292010 ай бұрын
Sicuramente possiamo diventare una potenza navale.
@matteobardella66346 ай бұрын
Siamo già daxsemore una superpotenza navale?!😊
@nasigorengpecelesteh1506 Жыл бұрын
Italian and france always have taste of design and efficient for their product Semoga indonesia segera membeli kapal ini dan lisensi nya
@giogio15678 ай бұрын
In fact, the Malaysian government has ordered two of these ships.
@Anticebongandkadrun2128 ай бұрын
@@giogio1567 wong bruh, but Indonesia trough Indonesia Minister of Defence Mr Prabowo Subianto bought this two ships
@eryyunartakusdiantara53488 ай бұрын
@@giogio1567😂 indonesia
@giogio15678 ай бұрын
@@eryyunartakusdiantara5348 it's always good in those parts!,😉
@met71metaldetector55 Жыл бұрын
Le PPA sono progettate per svariati ruoli e contesti , sono classificate PPA (pattugliatori polivalenti d'altura) ma in caso di conflitto sono predisposte le light e + a diventare full , vi ricordo che le 2 full avranno il ruolo di fregate di prima linea , il progetto iniziale erano previsti 16 PPA poi ridotte a 7 unita + 3 optional
@AlFreeman-xy4jy Жыл бұрын
News just out: two PPAs under construction and ready to be launched will be ceded to Indonesia. I read on a site (I think Indonesian) that Indonesia has asked the Italian government to hand over at least two PPAs to it immediately, without having to wait years for construction. It seems that Italy has agreed, since the situation in the South China Sea is deteriorating.
@Re.Configured Жыл бұрын
Wow indeed! This is a really cool looking ship. It must be super convenient to have the Bridge and CIC in the same spot, but also kind of risky since it's all in one spot. But perhaps the small size of the ship makes that point mute since a missile strike would really mess up the ship regardless. Or am I wrong?
@CheapSushi Жыл бұрын
I think it is because it is a Patrol ships or Light duty "Frigate" as opposed to say a front line vessel like the Arliegh Burkes or other Destroyers. So they benefit more from the kind of situational awareness and crew movement. I think in a front line warship, they would like build the CIC & Bridge in different areas and armor the CIC (well with anti-spall).
@lucaiervasi85155 ай бұрын
@@CheapSushi these units introduce a new system called PLOC (combat operational bridge) in the FULL variant, these ships become front line combat ships. today, all ships have the command bridge and the COP or CIC. in war mode, the unit is piloted from the command bridge, while all weapon systems are managed by the CIC, during combat, these two areas must constantly communicate with each other and neither can replace the other. on PPA, in war mode, part of the crew is migrated from the CIC to the command bridge, this transforms into PLOC and all weapons systems are managed from the bridge, together with the rest of the ship, including the engine room, which is managed by the two pilots sitting in the cockpit. therefore, everything is operated by the PLOC in a single point, this reduces latency and increases the efficiency of the entire system. another innovation introduced by PPA is the absence of the devices in the CIC. on a ship today, each CIC operator has his own station and cannot change it, while on PPA, the operator can use any station he wants, just enter his credentials and the station transforms into the one for which the operator and specialized, furthermore, all the servers and management systems are not in the CIC, but are positioned in another deck of the ship, in the CIC, there are only replicas of the systems. therefore, both the bridge and the CIC are armoured, but if these were hit, they would not destroy the ship's core, because this is positioned elsewhere. Furthermore, in the event of destruction in the PLOC and the CIC, the unit can be managed by the PLOP (platform operations bridge) located in the belly of the ship.
@lucaiervasi85155 ай бұрын
these units introduce a new system called PLOC (combat operational bridge) in the FULL variant, these ships become front line combat ships. today, all ships have the command bridge and the COP or CIC. in war mode, the unit is piloted from the command bridge, while all weapon systems are managed by the CIC, during combat, these two areas must constantly communicate with each other and neither can replace the other. on PPA, in war mode, part of the crew is migrated from the CIC to the command bridge, this transforms into PLOC and all weapons systems are managed from the bridge, together with the rest of the ship, including the engine room, which is managed by the two pilots sitting in the cockpit. therefore, everything is operated by the PLOC in a single point, this reduces latency and increases the efficiency of the entire system. another innovation introduced by PPA is the absence of the devices in the CIC. on a ship today, each CIC operator has his own station and cannot change it, while on PPA, the operator can use any station he wants, just enter his credentials and the station transforms into the one for which the operator and specialized, furthermore, all the servers and management systems are not in the CIC, but are positioned in another deck of the ship, in the CIC, there are only replicas of the systems. therefore, both the bridge and the CIC are armoured, but if these were hit, they would not destroy the ship's core, because this is positioned elsewhere. Furthermore, in the event of destruction in the PLOC and the CIC, the unit can be managed by the PLOP (platform operations bridge) located in the belly of the ship.
@Neldot6 ай бұрын
The funny thing is that this class of ship has more power and displacement than a traditional frigate, in fact when fully equipped it has the offensive power of a destroyer, including the capacity for coastal bombardment, but the Navy had to call it a "Patrol Vessel" because the pacifists in parliament would have been angry if Italy had too many front line ships in its fleet.
@neutronalchemist3241Ай бұрын
It's called PPA because this class of ships has to replace four Soldati-class frigates and eight Minerva-class corvettes, so it's not going to be a front line ship only, but it has to perform light patrol duties also. And infact only part of the fleet will be of "full" configuration ships. The "light" and "light+" ships have not the same offensive capabilities of full fledged frigates, hence the name.
@flaviosonetti515 Жыл бұрын
if you go back in time you will see what we were really able to do...and i'm not referring only to warships and battleships... michelangelo and raphael? or before, green count, red count, white hand count... the rex, one above all. the Italian ships were the most beautiful ships in the world. then if we want to go on warships ... well ... battleship regia Roma and its Littorio class, some of the most beautiful floating masterpieces ever created in the history of the navy.
@ClaudeMagicbox Жыл бұрын
Vero... però va anche detto che la Littorio riusci ad ingaggiare battaglia una sola volta e fu disastrosa, sparò se non ricordo male 29 colpi mancandone 27... mentre la Roma non prese mai il mare e fu affondata in porto a Civitavecchia da aerosiluranti Inglesi...
@flaviosonetti515 Жыл бұрын
@@ClaudeMagicbox no, la Roma è stata affondata dai tedeschi il 9 settembre che l'hanno bombardata con le fritz-x , le prime bombe teleguidate della storia, il mare l'ha preso eccome, tant'è che quando è affondata non era a civitavecchia ma lungo le coste della sardegna (golfo dell'asinara) mentre si stava dirigendo verso le coste dell'algeria, poichè la maddalena era stata appena occupata dai tedeschi ,e quindi trovò la sua tragica fine quel giorno, portandosi con se quasi 1400 uomini.
@danielefabbro822 Жыл бұрын
@@ClaudeMagicbox vero, ma lo fece ad una distanza di 32 km. Nessuna nave riusciva ad ingaggiare a tale distanza.
@lucaiervasi8515 Жыл бұрын
@@ClaudeMagicbox soltanto nella battaglia di capomatapan, la vittorio veneto sparò 75 colpi, senza colpire nulla e nel corso della guerra spararono centinaia di colpi, andando a segno poche volte e nella maggiorparte delle volte, scheggie dei proietti da 381 colpivano le navi, come nel caso dell'incrociatore da battaglia HMS Kingston, colpito e gravemente danneggiato, oppure l'incrociatore HMS Euryalus e HMS Havock. in cannoni furono progettati sulle specifiche richieste della regia marina, questi dovevano avere una volocità elevatissima alla volata per raggiungere le distanze richieste. risultato? nessuna corazzata riuscì a sparare più lontano della classe littorio e la velocità alla volata le consentiva di sparare bombe da 900kg, che riuscivano a penetrare 550mm di corazza a 25km, lo stesso potere perforante dei pezzi da 406mm americani, nemmeno la corazzata yamato sarebbe riuscita a resistere a una bordata dei 381/50 a quella distanza. per contro, l'enorme velocità del proietto alla volata, generava una spaventosa dispersione delle salve. sostanzialmente, sopra i 25km non prendevi un cazzo nemmeno se sparavi 1000 colpi. la corazzata classe littorio fù cmq all'avanguardia e introdusse soluzioni tecnologiche mai viste prima. la corazzata roma non fù affondata in porto e non furono gli inglesi a farlo. fù affondata in mare aperto dai tedeschi, che per affondarla utilizzarono una nuova arma, la sd 1400 o Fritz-X, la prima bomba radioguidata della storia.
@lucianorosarelli-xr5lr Жыл бұрын
@@lucaiervasi8515 ma vero quando aprono la bocca per dire cazzate la bomba fu sganciata da un he 110 crucco dopo l'armistizio con la roma diretta a sud
@micumatrix3 ай бұрын
Looks very clever made
@ryanzhangjunxi Жыл бұрын
modern warships should add this
@canemcave11 ай бұрын
looks like a command bridge of a spaceship
@CheapSushi Жыл бұрын
Do you think more ships will eventually have bridges/cockpits like this?
@lucaiervasi8515 Жыл бұрын
it seems that all future Italian units will have this configuration. Leonardo has invested a lot of resources in the development of new systems of the ppa class. these ships will act as an active laboratory for refining and improving this new configuration.
@lucianorosarelli-xr5lr Жыл бұрын
with this configuration we need less personal than a light figade( ppa is more or less a lite frigade for tons ) and has more space to impove firepower or asw capability. fremm /costellation its more or less the same tonns but it cost more than buble in milions dollars witout asw army like mu90 torpedo not included in desing
@oldbutbold4 ай бұрын
The bridge is really unusual. Everyone else is building rather conventional stuff but the Italians went a step further.
@andyfebriandy1179 Жыл бұрын
Good ship ❤
@Bishal_Goswami Жыл бұрын
08:29 is that a JS Kumano? are you at IMDEX 2023?
@nicola07 Жыл бұрын
9/84 marinaio per sempre...🇮🇹⚓⚓
@AlFreeman-xy4jy Жыл бұрын
Complimenti per il video! Da ora hai un nuovo abbonato.
@MP-hz3ye Жыл бұрын
Italians do it better
@LoanwordEggcorn Жыл бұрын
Thanks much to you and the Commadner. She is well armed and sensored and has many interesting ideas. Certainly more than adequate for coastal patrol, but I'd question the survivability of the relatively open bridge and CIC in full combat.
@lucaiervasi85155 ай бұрын
these units introduce a new system called PLOC (combat operational bridge) in the FULL variant, these ships become front line combat ships. today, all ships have the command bridge and the COP or CIC. in war mode, the unit is piloted from the command bridge, while all weapon systems are managed by the CIC, during combat, these two areas must constantly communicate with each other and neither can replace the other. on PPA, in war mode, part of the crew is migrated from the CIC to the command bridge, this transforms into PLOC and all weapons systems are managed from the bridge, together with the rest of the ship, including the engine room, which is managed by the two pilots sitting in the cockpit. therefore, everything is operated by the PLOC in a single point, this reduces latency and increases the efficiency of the entire system. another innovation introduced by PPA is the absence of the devices in the CIC. on a ship today, each CIC operator has his own station and cannot change it, while on PPA, the operator can use any station he wants, just enter his credentials and the station transforms into the one for which the operator and specialized, furthermore, all the servers and management systems are not in the CIC, but are positioned in another deck of the ship, in the CIC, there are only replicas of the systems. therefore, both the bridge and the CIC are armoured, but if these were hit, they would not destroy the ship's core, because this is positioned elsewhere. Furthermore, in the event of destruction in the PLOC and the CIC, the unit can be managed by the PLOP (platform operations bridge) located in the belly of the ship.
@LoanwordEggcorn5 ай бұрын
@@lucaiervasi8515 Grazie! Sounds like great thought has been given to survivability and operability. I'm still not sure I agree with the decisions, but I appreciate the new thinking. A backup war/combat bridge is a great idea, as are generic combat stations. This demonstrates a good understanding of the digital age.
@lucaiervasi85155 ай бұрын
in reality the PLOP is not a reserve CIC, the snow is also designed to provide humanitarian aid. amidships there is the modular section, at this point various types of modules can be installed, such as hospital modules, by installing them a mini hospital on board is created with additional beds and equipment for complex operations. other modules are for example the command and control, which allows the ship to become a management platform for the operations of a naval team, or the modules for special forces, these are installed in the case of missions that require the presence of special forces coalition etc. there are also modules for adding weapon systems. the PLOP, in addition to its ordinary tasks, can manage the added modules, the ship has the ability to intervene immediately in areas where natural disasters occur and can provide electricity and drinking water to a population of 15,000 people. all these things are managed by PLOP. but unlike the other units present in the world today, no PPA system is physically connected to the stations, for example, on the command bridge there is also the classic helmsman, positioned in the classic rearward point. the helmsman gets up from the front pilot's seat, goes to the wheelhouse, enters his credentials and the guidance of the unit passes to the classic wheelhouse. in a war zone, if a ship is hit at any point, it can no longer continue the fight and must retreat to the second or third line of battle. if in extreme cases, the ship is hit and both the bridge and the CIC are destroyed, the PLOP takes command of the ship to retreat, not to continue the fight, but since unlike the other units, the ship's brain is not positioned in the CIC, the ship can still defend itself, because all systems remain operational and can be migrated to the PLOP. this station is not managed by a lieutenant of a frigate or vessel, as usually happens, but is commanded by a corvette captain. this is because in the event of the disaster mentioned above, it is assumed that the entire general staff of the ship is dead present in those points, therefore the entire command hierarchy. this way, the unit will still have a working command line. the electronic system of this class of ships is so complex that 4 people, 2 sitting in the pilot's seat, one sitting in the position on the right (the one that in the video, at minute 2.35 can be glimpsed hidden by a cloth with the writing Leonardo) and the in the other position on the left, they would be able to govern the entire unit, without the help of anyone else. weapon system included.
@lucaiervasi85155 ай бұрын
in reality the PLOP is not a reserve CIC, the snow is also designed to provide humanitarian aid. amidships there is the modular section, at this point various types of modules can be installed, such as hospital modules, by installing them a mini hospital on board is created with additional beds and equipment for complex operations. other modules are for example the command and control, which allows the ship to become a management platform for the operations of a naval team, or the modules for special forces, these are installed in the case of missions that require the presence of special forces coalition etc. there are also modules for adding weapon systems. the PLOP, in addition to its ordinary tasks, can manage the added modules, the ship has the ability to intervene immediately in areas where natural disasters occur and can provide electricity and drinking water to a population of 15,000 people. all these things are managed by PLOP. but unlike the other units present in the world today, no PPA system is physically connected to the stations, for example, on the command bridge there is also the classic helmsman, positioned in the classic rearward point. the helmsman gets up from the front pilot's seat, goes to the wheelhouse, enters his credentials and the guidance of the unit passes to the classic wheelhouse. in a war zone, if a ship is hit at any point, it can no longer continue the fight and must retreat to the second or third line of battle. if in extreme cases, the ship is hit and both the bridge and the CIC are destroyed, the PLOP takes command of the ship to retreat, not to continue the fight, but since unlike the other units, the ship's brain is not positioned in the CIC, the ship can still defend itself, because all systems remain operational and can be migrated to the PLOP. this station is not managed by a lieutenant of a frigate or vessel, as usually happens, but is commanded by a corvette captain. this is because in the event of the disaster mentioned above, it is assumed that the entire general staff of the ship is dead present in those points, therefore the entire command hierarchy. this way, the unit will still have a working command line. the electronic system of this class of ships is so complex that 4 people, 2 sitting in the pilot's seat, one sitting in the position on the right (the one that in the video, at minute 2.35 can be glimpsed hidden by a cloth with the writing Leonardo) and the in the other position on the left, they would be able to govern the entire unit, without the help of anyone else. weapon system included.
@LoanwordEggcorn5 ай бұрын
@@lucaiervasi8515 Very impressive.
@jihoon123ful Жыл бұрын
Wow an Racing inspired steering wheel!!!! 😅
@lucaghioldi328 Жыл бұрын
👍
@nofanfebriawan20118 ай бұрын
🇮🇹🤝🇲🇨 Congratulation italia from contract 2 PPA to Indonesia Army
@SabdoBagusIngAti8 ай бұрын
Fantastic n brilliant idea , hopefully Indonesia Navy will be operator this vessel. Gracias Don Italiano
@deanhankio6304 Жыл бұрын
if it's an italian ship, the kitchen is probably twice bigger compared to a soccer field
@Zagoreni02A Жыл бұрын
Darn, Croatia should order few of these instead of those old missile boats. Or maybe few Mogami class frigates. These smaller ships are affordable to even smaller nations.
@Ezekiel903 Жыл бұрын
agree, and it's even well armed, kronos radar, this would be ideal
@monoris20087 ай бұрын
7:13 宇宙戦艦ヤマトの床面スクリーンと同じ機能
@morrisfonti8320 Жыл бұрын
Perché i documentari in inglese sono sempre migliori di quelli fatti da noi italiano se tu vai in un documentario italiano non troverai mai i sistemi d’arma sembra che ci vergognamo di dire che ci sono ma che stranezza di noi italiani I
@extremathule982 Жыл бұрын
Non è che "sembra", proprio si vergognano. Il tutto rovinerebbe la narrativa dell'italiano mandolinaro imposta da certi partiti politici, se no sei fascista, nazista, tubista etc..
@picardbs Жыл бұрын
Noi davvero ci vergognamo di avere armi, sinistra e preti ci hanno fatto il lavaggio del cervello.
@ahmadheryawan82877 ай бұрын
Alhamdulillah Indonesian navy get it❤
@fivetwenty1628 ай бұрын
Buongiorno Italia Deal 2 Unit 🇮🇹🤝🇮🇩.
@Gabriel-dy6pm Жыл бұрын
The Italian Navy has commissioned 7 of those ships by now (five already built). It had a plan to build 16 of them, but I don't know if it will follow the original plan.
@met71metaldetector55 Жыл бұрын
Si era inizialmente previste 16 unità , ma poi nel nuovo programma navale ne fanno 7 in tre versioni 2 light 3 light+ 2 full (fregate di prima linea ) poi nel programma c'era un optional per altre 3 unità ma per adesso si faranno solo 7 , anche perché è subentrato il programma Epc (european Patrol corvette ). Da 8 unità che si sta iniziando la costruzione
@viktoro.ledenyov5829 Жыл бұрын
Super!!!😊😊😊
@dhoffice6725 Жыл бұрын
What about the huge sail area for main superstructure? How does she handle?