California Prop 3: What to know about the marriage equality measure

[@RobMyHoodies]

Opening doors for child marriage is crazy

[@natassiaparker286]

I’ve been looking for someone else to say this

[@phillipnelson8567]

The same old same old. WE DONT CARE. IDGAF ABOUT THIS SH!T. WE CANT PAY GROCERIES AND RENT RIGHT NOW.

[@shamarievlogs]

The government does not set groceries or rent prices. If you want that then move to Russia.

[@minilalo1]

@@shamarievlogsthey complain about communism but that’s literally what they want. They want a dictatorship with trump as there leader lol.

[@gabrielluchs3476]

Ok. Then this should be an easy yes vote then. That would keep things the way they are now.

[@phillipnelson8567]

@@shamarievlogs Shannon can't make this comment on her page, because no one would hear it. She has 20 subscribers on her sad KZbin profile. lol

[@ChrisJones-rm7uu]

​@@gabrielluchs3476A no vote means keep things the way they are, if you vote.Yes that means you want to change it

[@icaliver]

Til the state start being super transparent in plain English what their doing with our tax dollars. NO on all props, and Yes on 33 and 36.

[@isabellezablocki7447]

Then that's a yes on prop 3 because it has no incidence on our tax dollars. I am also voting yes on 33 and 34.

[@icaliver]

@@isabellezablocki7447 I can’t tell you how to vote that’s up to the individual, I don’t see the point of arguing about it. But I’m glad we all agree on the measures 33 and 34 this out of control

[@isabellezablocki7447]

@@icaliver Yeah !

[@gregglira9947]

Agreed people can barely afford a living, and politicians want to up rise the taxes which is bs. I also don't favor this marriage amendment because my own faith is how God attends it a man and a women uniting to become a whole of one.

[@ilikespaghetti4458]

I don't believe it's wise to vote no on _every_ ballot measure just because of two when you can simply put yes on the ones you want regardless. There are important issues in there. I would vote yes on 3.

[@lauravazquez1955]

You guys forgot to add that this would also allow polygamy polyandry poliginy , bigamy, marriage between humans and animals, marriage between adults and children, marriages between child and child and marriage between humans and objects such as AI. You need to act professional and include everything that is included not only a few words to make it seem it's not a big deal.

[@isabellezablocki7447]

There is no age limit right now to marry in California and there are abuses despite the curent definition of mariage between woman and a man. There are previous victims of arranged mariages when they were still under age who are fighting to change the law and ask for a minimum legal age to marry in California. It has nothing to do with proposition 3.

[@ilikespaghetti4458]

This is not true lol, it would change nothing about how marriage is conducted in the state, it would only remove language prohibiting two people of the same gender from marrying. What you're saying is baseless propaganda that gay marriage opponents have been claiming since the 2000s. A decade later and no one is marrying children (except of course in red states if you genuinely care).

[@iamjungle3558]

Just say you identify as a man and woman and you can live your life. Or you can use logic and say its your right to privacy

[@user-kn9tt6ny3v]

NO STOP RAISING PROPERTY TAX/RENT! Nonessential proposition expenses are passed on as property tax and it's raised annually! That's passed on as rent!

[@jernynesto4269]

Voting no😂😂😂😂

[@veronicabuenrostro]

Vote NO

[@BravoStone]

Stop ✋️

[@kitty9089]

Sorry but a big NO

[@anon8373]

good, so i will vote no

[@lennyface6828]

Looks great to me! I voted yes!

[@ChrisJones-rm7uu]

No

[@ilikespaghetti4458]

Amazing!

[@ilikespaghetti4458]

​@@ChrisJones-rm7uuwhy not?

[@ChrisJones-rm7uu]

@@ilikespaghetti4458 because that A choice To want to live that lifestyle and nobody has to Celebrate it or go along with it And Marriage is between a man and a woman

[@johnc4736]

I voted no

[@The22j]

Does "NO" mean marriage for a man and a woman only?

[@ilikespaghetti4458]

​@@The22jyes. I would vote yes on it though

[@ilikespaghetti4458]

Why would you do such a thing? Why do people of the same gender not deserve the same rights and benefits as you simply because of _your_ personal beliefs?

[@The22j]

@@ilikespaghetti4458 I voted NO because I believe marriage should be between a man and a woman to have kids together.

[@DoomDwaneCat]

This is a trap. It seems this means child marrage, incest and ect is allowed. I don't approve under 18 should get married according to the "Cons" argument. (Hopefully youtube doesn't delete this message.)

[@lennyface6828]

Where's your evidence?

[@DoomDwaneCat]

@@lennyface6828 official Los Angeles website voterguide.sos.ca.gov/ ________ PDF link vig.cdn.sos.ca.gov/2024/general/pdf/complete-vig.pdf (page 5 and view prop 3) _____ I'd recommend clicking on the website link and finding PDF files in any language. This is the official physical book I remember in September.

[@andyincalimoto843]

what's your proof

[@DoomDwaneCat]

@@andyincalimoto843 I posted it a few days ago somehow KZbin deleted my post. (No worry I copy paste in my notes.)

[@ilikespaghetti4458]

This isn't true. Gay marriage opponents have been saying this since the 2000s but it has never happened. All it does is remove the ban on people of the same gender. If you're really worried about child marriage look into red state laws

[@carlosjimenez630]

I’m for equal marriage but why erase the constitution it’s our history. 😢

[@ilikespaghetti4458]

The constitution is constantly amended, that's how constitutions work, and nothing about the ban on gay marriage is historic, it was added in 2008..this won't erase the entire constitution simply discriminatory language in one section. And constitutions are the basis of state law, not changing it when necessary is a bad idea

[@fernie-spec5134]

🥴

[@bhuff123]

Is Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve?

[@oneral6450]

So yes or no on prop 3?

[@pedroduenas2104]

That nasy how he says it the age of the way they get married. Save our kids

[@oneral6450]

@@pedroduenas2104 so yes or no?

[@mahufi77]

So YES to protect their rights?

[@oneral6450]

@@mahufi77 So no, got it.

[@chuckxu5910]

I’m gay👨‍❤️‍👨

[@mrparkerdan]

keep it to yourself, no one cares.

[@Username-bw2ie]

​@@mrparkerdan obviously you do lol 😂 They wouldn't be told to keep it to themselves if people didn't care 🤦‍♂️

[@Tyler_Bender]

@@mrparkerdan Eight people do. cope.

[@ChrisJones-rm7uu]

Your comment is the reason people don't want to hear about it in a gonna vote no crap

[@ilikespaghetti4458]

​@@ChrisJones-rm7uuvery toxic mentality. If one harmless comment will make you vote against the equal human rights of others than I'm sorry but it's a you problem..

[@mrparkerdan]

Leviticus 18:22 "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination"

[@gabrielluchs3476]

And I am not religious so that has no meaning to me.

[@icaliver]

Women aren’t supposed to wear pants either so? But I’m voting No, on this anyways cause it feels like another scheme to tax us more. But definitely yes on 34.

[@mrparkerdan]

@@gabrielluchs3476 do you believe in biology? maybe i can draw you some anatomically incompatible shapes?

[@anthonygonzales3523]

Based comment

[@Username-bw2ie]

@@mrparkerdan lol obviously you'd say that

[@MsBratz21]

that’s why I’m voting NO!! To prop 3

[@ilikespaghetti4458]

Why?