Sorry for misidentifying Michael Graziano of Princeton University
@surojeetchatterji996625 күн бұрын
Guruji I think Neuroscience is calling Jiva as conciousness. Brain is holding jiva. Jiva is called Tantra, represented with Jupiter & Moon in astrology. It will be duality. Atma is different which never born never die which is non dual.
@leandrosilvagoncalves1939Ай бұрын
Bernardo Kastrup's Analytic Idealism actually resonates with Advaita Vedanta a lot. There are even some talks between him and Swami Sarvapriyananda here on KZbin.
@phantomhawk01Ай бұрын
Absolutely recommend Bernardo Kastrup to anyone interested in this topic.
@mohitdhiman79Ай бұрын
Watch the debate between bernardo and michael james.
@cameronhuff5170Ай бұрын
The man is a genius. I was a nonspiritual athiest who thought the brain produced consciousness until I heard Bernardo explain in such a logical way why that was wrong. I've since been on a better path.
@ArjunLSenАй бұрын
There is significant difference between the two views even though prima facie they seem to have a lot of concurrence. I watched an extensive discussion between ,Kastrup and Michael Matthews, an Advaita vedānta master. Matthews emphatically declared that all experience and suffering was illusory while Kastrup insisted that all experience was real but all reality was mental, therefore the everything was real. The denial of the reality of suffering was very difficult for Kastrup to accept and I felt exactly the same I think this new discussion going on between Eastern metaphysics and analytical idealism is going to prove fruitful. For me, I have detected a weakness in Advaita vedānta : it's focus on cosmic reality leads it to actually deny other levels of being / experience as unreal. The radical ontology of Advaita does not answer our human needs. Whereas analytical idealism can see that ALL reality is non physical or "mental" but all experience which arises from excitations of cosmic consciousness are absolutely real. The illusion is of physicality pet se but NOT of experience. Thus, analytical idealism bridges the gap between ontic reality and experience, between cosmic bliss and suffering, and shows where these levels might taken together find us a roadmap towards true understanding.
@vinceofyorkАй бұрын
@@cameronhuff5170that’s beautiful to hear. There are many atheists beginning to realize this. Bernardo is an absolute gift to the logically minded.
@krishnansm438Ай бұрын
Swamiji, this is one of the most lucid videos that explains Consciousness while not shying away from counter arguments. You have cleared ALL my lingering doubts in my spiritual quest .Pranams and I am grateful.
@yashveer201321 күн бұрын
Swamiji good attempt to explain Advait Vedant. (The soul of Sanatan Dharma) But be responsible what you convey for the society….. Advaita Vedant arise from “ suniyawad or zeroism of Buddhism”. Buddhist scholars repeatedly said don’t move in the trap of “ zeroism” becoz it will lead to a world of non- existence or non-real world where the purpose of life lost. This mean when you realise that our existence is of nothing. our existence make no sense…..or other word doing anything is useless. This understanding make society lazy, non-productive and full of orthodoxy teaching of Gods…..that is happening in India Those who teach Advaita Vedant also support Idol worship ……..which is no where near!!!!! Please don’t be in the delusion of grandiosity which cost darkness to the society Please practice what you teach……if you teach Advait Vedant than remove all idol worship, if you teach idol worship remove Advait Vedant from the teaching……….🙏🙏
@GoldTopLaneАй бұрын
Thank you Swamiji for exemplifying the spirit of self-inquiry- the ultimate quest! Imagine how disappointing it would be to find the source of consciousness and put it in a bottle or define it in an algorithm. Rather I sense, it is because consciousness is not graspable that everything is possible. To sink into the essence of your very own being is to understand consciousness as the source of itself. To get even close to this is like watching the most beautiful sunrise - the heart begins to melt in uncontainable pure joy. Consciousness is not an isolated ’dead’ thing. The journey of self discovery, is enabled by the purification of the heart and the mind, that goes through the heart and through the mind. The perceivable world is full of life and death, all coming and going, the witnessing of which renders one into dumbstruck awe. Consciousness is not even the ‘life” that I feel.. not even “the feeling of existence”, who I think I am .. or am not.. and therefore not death either… Despite all the doubt, speculation, conjecture & disappointment. Embracing all aspirations, hope and wonder stands the immediate knowledge of our true selves - that we name “consciousness” - the realisation of which is pure love - enough to make you cry the pure tears of a child come home forever 💛🌸🌏✨✨🙏
@ashoknairkunnath8249Ай бұрын
Great!
@silverly0Ай бұрын
The final statement is a very important one. You're right in thinking that this discussion of the scientific origins of reality's might threaten Vedanta teachings. But the problem with science is lacking its own understanding of subjectivity. This is why Vedanta teachings teaching will stand the test of time 😉. However as part of limitations of self inquiry one could assume that Vedanta would be limited in objectivity. However in my experience (and i hope keen readers also understand this) this leads to enhanced objectivity. Why? Because i am aware of my own conscious experience and so i am aware of what i am projecting onto reality. Anyone who pursues and understands vedantic teachings can use science as a way to understand this manifestation of reality we find ourselves in.
@gordonpepper1400Ай бұрын
please study the development of language and in particular written language, which, in essence, allows for this awareness of my own conscious experience.
@audreydugan9668Ай бұрын
Wonderful - this was an illuminating Lesson. I believe you are gifted with an amazing ability of presenting very deep, complicated, even abstract subjects in a way that clears the path before us. I enjoyed this Lesson very, very much
@Magik1369Ай бұрын
I am Self Realized after 30 years of agonizing inner work. After everything I have experienced and learned...the Individual Soul is absolutely real and is Divine. The Source of the Divine within is located deep inside the heart. The Source of the Soul is the Divine Oneness ...the Absolute...that is the Ground of Being and sustains all living beings without fail. Every Soul is like a wave on the Ocean of the Divine.
@user-tf6eb4nl9wАй бұрын
Make a video
@alecmisra4964Ай бұрын
Well said.
@kapoorhАй бұрын
"Every Soul is like a wave on the Ocean of the Divine." Beautifully said. Thank you!
@reversefulfillment9189Ай бұрын
Great video Swamiji 🙏 ❤️
@kapoorhАй бұрын
Swamiji, you described a very complex subject in such a clear way that it will put most professors to shame. Thank you for this video 🙏
@marizamartins6400Ай бұрын
Neuroscience can keep trying... Wonderful video Swamiji !
@vinceofyorkАй бұрын
The only thing they could ever do is show you a correlate, but never the Qualia. And as we know, correlation does not equal causation . Matter, only looks like matter because our perceptions have evolved to present it to us that way, same goes with neurons and brains. Matter/neurons the way they appear does not have its own stand alone existence apart from the observer. Bernardo Kastrup explains this beautifully if anyone’s interested.
@surojeetchatterji996625 күн бұрын
@@vinceofyork neuroscience correlation is discovering Tantra. Tantra is dualism called jiva. Atma is Adwaita. Jiva takes rebirth atma never born nor die. Neuroscience assuming jiva as conciousness. 😂
@pvbreddy123Ай бұрын
Thank you! Swamiji🙏 Hopefully, some materialists will change their viewpoint on consciousness.
@TMKMJАй бұрын
In last two sentences Swami ji beautifully summerized whole video.....😊
@sushamaphanse7505Ай бұрын
Many Thanks Swamiji for this superlative comprehensive video. Truly the need of the hour! You have given a brilliant simplified overview of so many conflicting theories . I cannot even begin to imagine the hours of intense study involved to make this 30 minute video with such clarity. Eternally grateful,,🙏🙏🙏
@NM-zu3kjАй бұрын
Dear Swamiji… thanks for sharing your wisdom … the world needs your teaching more than ever. 🪷🙏🏼
@SaleemRanaAuthorАй бұрын
As someone who leans toward Jnana Yoga, I consider Advaita Vedanta the right path for me. Your beautiful exposition clarified things even further for me. May I request the following topics for your future videos: "What is the difference between Advaita and Dvaita?" Also, "What is the difference between human consciousness and artificial intelligence?" (Not so much the technological aspect, but how both the conscious mind and an app's prompt-generated content on a topic appear to be based on an algorithm that reviews stored data.)
@caioborgeslopes927Ай бұрын
Thank you Swami! 😁
@Arvy111Ай бұрын
I am at this time working in the forest. I see, hear, touch, smell and even taste the wonderful forms of nature. And I know it's all experience within me . Not outside of me. Thank you.
@WildAlchemicalSpiritАй бұрын
Saved to my Exploring consciousness playlist. Thank you so much for this. 🙏
@idonotlikethismusicАй бұрын
I subscribed to your channel after seeing all your playlists!
@amalkumarniyogi66719 күн бұрын
This is the real education to save the world. Take my regards.
@AvindraGoolcharanАй бұрын
9:46 small mistake-- robert penrose should be roger penrose
@EmilyMikoАй бұрын
Wow, Swamiji!! This video was amazing, I feel like it answered a lot of questions I had about the scientific theories about consciousness. Thank you so much for sharing your wisdom, you truly have the gift of imparting knowledge 🕉️ namaste
@moses7556Ай бұрын
Swamiji, this video is a real beauty though it deserves to have more time. It's short looking to the complexity of subject. Pls make another video on the same subject after sometime
@kmanohamАй бұрын
Dear Swamiji.....Thank-you for tackling this rather complex subject. You have, as always, succinctly summarised & explained a deeply complex subject. We are fortunate indeed to be taught by you. Thank you again.
@susannahkelpyotter5595Ай бұрын
Thank you for presenting knowledge and introducing Knowing.
@rajukunjukrishnan472Ай бұрын
Pranam Guruji 🙏
@yoboipapi5306Ай бұрын
Wow! Swamiji truly has a gift for breaking down, explaining and comparing such complex subjects from both spiritual and scientific perspectives. One of the most intellectually engaging pieces of media I've consumed in a long time! 🙏❤️
@titanostrongmanАй бұрын
You’re awesome as alway. Thank you for sharing your own sensed limitations. Your balance of learning and wisdom are refreshing as always. I’m always weary of people who claim to know everything and you don’t do that❤️
@ytrrsАй бұрын
Nice summary from NeuroScience to Advaita. Roger Penrose's microtubules quantum theory has the best chance of success to connect to the consciousness. Chalmer doesn't explain how the consciousness produces matter/energy or how they're interconnected, does he?
@ytrrsАй бұрын
30:16 - "not a philosophical speculation". Yet, Advaita is translated as "vedantic philosophy" on many occasions, including in the ArshaBodha videos. 😀
@girishnanoti954Ай бұрын
Pranam Swami ji
@SSharma-fj8vdАй бұрын
Wonderful and beautiful explanation 🙏🙏❤❤❤
@Kassam78629 күн бұрын
Consciousness, a complex metaphysical subjective phenomenon; has been tackled with clarity and excellent analysis with the objective co-relates. Well said Swamiji. Advaita Vedantic self-inquiry of witness within, has and will continue to stand up to the test tested eternal truths in the the way of meta-physical experiences. Meaning, it is only the Consciousness that can experience itself. Let me expand more. Any self-enquiry tool, such as the intellect, which itself is the manifestation of Consciousness, cannot experience Consciousness. Only Consciousness can Self experience itself. And that is where science and its analytical methods, will continue to find difficulty finding answers to "hard problem of Consciousness."
@knottyinks1Ай бұрын
This topic is fascinating when it’s explained properly so thank you for doing that so thoughtfully. Donald Hoffman is one of the few scientists that go against the grain and well worth a listen too. I must admit a lot of what he says goes straight over my head but still fascinating 😅
@israelperesАй бұрын
Muito obrigado pela aula! ❤
@frankclough38020 күн бұрын
There was no patience or dedication necessary for hearing you to the end, I was hanging on to every word with intense interest, it was an inspiring and insightful talk and you addressed many issues that I have been ruminating on for years. Science will never identify a substance called "consciousness" as another fundamental force of nature like electromagnetism or the strong and weak nuclear forces since consciousness is not a force of nature but the ground of being in which nature and its forces are manifest. Rene Descartes was in a way right in his philosophy of ghosts and machines, but he got it the wrong way round, the ghost is not in the machine, the machine is in the ghost and I think that science today is slowly coming round to that view.
@shyamiyer2967Ай бұрын
Pranam swami ji 🙏🍁🙏
@kshiteeshsn263Ай бұрын
Thank you for addressing this 🙏
@phantomhawk01Ай бұрын
Absolutely marvellous video, this isy bread and butter thank you 🙏🏼
@sasidharravula55368 күн бұрын
It is not Robert Penrose but Roger Penrose. Roger is a Nobel Laureate for his original work on black holes.
@ikeiampossible950227 күн бұрын
Your presentation is very much appreciated. It's very thought provoking. Critical thinking is at work here. The validity of Atma and Braman is very challenging. Consciousness is a very wonderful concept. Integrating all these ideas are very mind expanding.. A job or research well done, professor!. I love it all Please do more. No one ever knows it all. But, you're almost very close.
@jayachandran196120 күн бұрын
Thanks a lot Swami Ji, a beautiful explanation, wonderful narration. Seems like an experienced sage.
@gladysmerlinmenezes96285 күн бұрын
Thanking for this wonderful presentation 🙏
@HekhalotАй бұрын
Thank you for this stimulating video. I don't think that Science And Advaita are talking about the same thing when they use the word "Consciousness". It's 2 different "things" for me. For science, consciousness is part of the human experience. The sensation of being a "me" an "I" can be in part the produce of my mind, of my story, of my memories. This is the mundane part of my self. The part who belong to the world and that is produced by/in the world. And there is this other part, the only one that really is and that is not subject of any experience, and that cannot be grasped by any means. By definition, consciousness (Brahman) will always be out of reach of science. So I don't think that science and religion (Advaita specificaly) can meet and establish a dialogue.
@danielfernandeznungaray8996Ай бұрын
Gracias por regalarme más armonía de pensamientos con sus enseñanzas 😊
@JessMakeSenseАй бұрын
You can study the radio(brain) but the actual broadcast(consciousness) is completely separate from the radio.
@ytrrsАй бұрын
Good point, by an example. Extending the analogy, if we can study only the radio (brain) then we should be able to find where the demodulator (to convert, decode the broadcast to local electrical signal to produce sound) in the radio is. That should give a clue about the broadcast (consciousness).
@cliffordjohnson943Ай бұрын
Consciousness is the infinite eternal awareness in All That Is. Consciousness can create the illusion of separation from Spirit. Our human experience is actually a dream in Spirit. You are One with everything.
@gridcoregilry666Ай бұрын
Thank you for this great new video of yours. Already 20k views
@GettotradeАй бұрын
Thank you so much for this knowledge, Swamiji... 🙏🙏🙏
@jeangatti9384Ай бұрын
Consciousness has no source ... consciousness is the source of everything
@williamburts311427 күн бұрын
thoughts aren't knower of thoughts, and emotions are just expressions of our attachments to objective objects, we don't get emotional over anything that we are not attached too. But what is it that makes that attachment possible? Answer: The pleasure principle, and that pleasure principle is of the self. It is because we are beings that seek gratification of our senses that makes us attached to those things that give us pleasure and from that attachment comes emotion. But the pleasure principle can't be observed as being of brain matter. So, the knower represents " chit " and the pleasure principle represents " ananda" (bliss ) both of these aspects of the self can't be attributed to neurons.
@shankarraoathaluri7345Ай бұрын
Beautiful explanation for learners
@buddymcАй бұрын
Thank you for this talk.
@bhuvaneshwarjoshi368321 күн бұрын
As per vedanta, it is through interaction with inner and outer environment ĝives birth to intelligence,knowledge and super knowledge.Nothing can come out of nothing,,so it is not virtual reality.
@Nana-KunwarАй бұрын
I read somewhere that brain is responsible for consciousness. It was a scientific article. I asked them what if consciousness exists seperately from brain. There is still no response to it. 😊😊😊😊😂😂😂😂. They can't disprove it. Theirs is just a concept based on neurological functions.
@SachiJonesАй бұрын
This is the only clear definition of consciousness, including differentiation between 'localized'' consciousness and consciousness as a phenomenon in general, that makes sense to me. But as a scientist-minded person, I'd love to hear a clear definition and differentiation from any scientific experts that makes as much sense.
@MichaelJones-ek3vxАй бұрын
Analytic Idealism provides a comprehensive philosophical understanding of consciousness. Bernardo Kastrup is a philosopher and Scientist has produced much scholarly work arguing for this. There many are many thousand s of people who have studied this and aligned themselves with this philosophical movement. I am one.
@seneeraj12 күн бұрын
Marvellous video, thank you. I have a question- in Hinduism, one accepts the rebirth of the same ‘Atma’ enters in another body by its own wish. And we have seen a lot of examples of rebirth or reincarnations all over the world. Here by this reference I just want to know that when all the organs are part of a body, which at last demises when the consciousness or Atma leaves the body, then where the past life memories resides? Do you think that it travels with consciousness or Atma during the rebirth? Can you please explain this with examples of what neuroscience thinks about it?
@1n1lymkАй бұрын
Swamiji, while I was meditation I had something going into my brain kind of distubing waves. I got vision of Chhinamasta, and it happened like my head was removed and I was in peace but still centered to my being. This would also mean that even though the head is removed and if you meditating on chest area you will identify yourself to your chest part rather than brain.
@zardoz7900Ай бұрын
Henri Bergson's theory is intriguing
@somphopsirikham7720Ай бұрын
Agree with you.Greatest vedio of the universe,or may universe be one of our conciousness!Thank verry much.
@raghavendratippur9397Ай бұрын
Very clear analytical explanation of experience . ..consciousness is Supreme, youtube video by Raghavendra Tippur. Gives further clarification and explanation of what is consciousness.
@ARJUNKUMAR-LtoEАй бұрын
Thank you Swami ji. This is a very complicated topic which you tried to explain very well.
@AlchemiCatАй бұрын
Having studied for many years I'd say Hermetic philosophy, or 'Hermeticism', and Advaita Vedanta, are arguably the same but by different terminology.
@KeshavSabharwal22 күн бұрын
Thank you
@jean-pierredevent970Ай бұрын
I came recently to consider that a thought, an idea could be seen in some "ridiculous" way as a kind of object and now I wonder if this is part of Indian philosophy?? It could be Plato too, not sure.
@alukuhitoАй бұрын
In one ear and out the other. I might have to listen to that again. Anyway, I am consciousness, which is not a thing. If someone were to supposedly find some source of consciousness, consciousness would still have to be before whatever source that is to say that it exists. 🙏
@JitendraPatel-hk3jv18 күн бұрын
It seems consciousness is the intrinsic property of an existence.
@JitendraPatel-hk3jvАй бұрын
How a limited entity can be a source of an all pervading infinite consciousness? The source of such consciousness can only be things present everywhere. Can it be space and entity so far known as well as unknown!
@marides1479Ай бұрын
Thank you Guru. We cannot explain consciousness because we all have a different consciousness. That is what make us unique. Science experiments, researches are conducted by scientists who look and explain the unknown from their own point of view. Only Brahman can exist.
@cosmichappening171229 күн бұрын
Only consciousness begets consciousness...
@ryandarger2755Ай бұрын
The mind and consciousness is as much in the brain/body as a radio signal is in a radio.
@lefthookouchmcarm4520Ай бұрын
This seems to be true in the way that consciousness arises from the six sense bases in buddhism. These sense signals are dependently arising so it wouldnt be right to to say "consciousness comes from the brain". The brain does seem to facilitate consciousness, but no more than the sense organs do. Consciousness is part of a system and the system is in the body and outside the body.
@paulvavken27 күн бұрын
I love your work
@user-fl1rz3uw6dАй бұрын
Thank you for the clear explanation. I really appreciate it. I do have a question: Why is it that the presence of the witness (in addition to thoughts and emotions) depends on an intact and functioning brain? If one puts the brain in a certain state (e.g. by administrating propofol to induce general anaesthesia) there is no witness anymore; The "light goes out" just as in a dreamless sleep. Why is this the case?
@williamburts311427 күн бұрын
Wakefulness, dream, deep sleep, are states of our material experience that come and go day by day but you as the knower of these states exist as a continuum that doesn't goe through states.
@user-fl1rz3uw6d27 күн бұрын
@@williamburts3114 Let me clarify my point: In deep sleep there is no witness, so the presence of the witness clearly depends on the state of the brain and I would be interested to know why this is the case according to Advaita Vedanta, because the witness is supposed to be the ground of existence.
@williamburts311427 күн бұрын
@@user-fl1rz3uw6d Your experience of deep sleep is vague, but it is still an experience because when you wake up you know that you dreamt nothing, so that experience still relates to you. In wakefulness and dream states objects appear on the screen of consciousness and we are engaged in them but in deep sleep since there is no objects to engage with the knower lies dormant. But we shouldn't think the self isn't present in such a state because if someone were to touch you or yell in your ear you would wake up.
@user-fl1rz3uw6d27 күн бұрын
@@williamburts3114 We indeed remember that we were in a dreamless sleep, but I don't see how this implies that "the knower lies dormant". Likewise, when someone touches you, you wake up because the brain is activated, but I don't see how this implies that "the self is present" during sleep. This seems like a huge leap of faith and not based on direct experience. As far as we know, during dreamless sleep, coma, general anaesthesia, or death, the light goes out and a lot is known about the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. I know that some people (e.g. Nisargadatta Maharaj) say that they are aware during dreamless sleep and I believe that it is indeed possible to attain such a state,, but I am convinced that this still relies on an intact brain.
@christianbernard3797Ай бұрын
What do you think of the statement of Julio Tononi who said that consciousness is a physical property of the universe much like gravity or mass ??
@ncsh9301Ай бұрын
speculation
@vik24oct1991Ай бұрын
Brain is concentration of cells with tiny consciousness of cells and cells are just collection of atoms which have consciousness, there is no reason to think robot isn’t conscious, anything which has many interactions would be conscious and we have no way to prove it.
@krishnakantamisra1754Ай бұрын
How consiousnes came in atom
@bhuvaneshwarjoshi368321 күн бұрын
In search of Brahman within and without_a distinction that gets dissolved the moment one realizes one's true nature.
@alessiozuccaro4810Ай бұрын
I think you confused Michael Gaziano (epidemiologist) with Michael GRAZIANO...
@davidmickles5012Ай бұрын
I always say.. Brains can think, and maybe we could make machines that think.. But ONLY CONSCIOUSNESS can experience
@chayanknightheartАй бұрын
thank you
@silberlinie27 күн бұрын
Please give a hint to the music played
@ultrafeel-tvАй бұрын
Can advaita explain why only ever the same body-mind (mine) appears in the one non-dual consciousness?
@angelarapuano1315Ай бұрын
Grazie, veramente interessante 🙏🏻🕉️🌸
@rekhaphatak9226Ай бұрын
Is this statement correct. Connect with Guru as consciousness,not as a person.
@mrbeyong4 күн бұрын
Which Advaita does he resonate with? There are legions of Advaitas. Neo/pseudo, traditional, most of what is called Advaita today is a mix of Buddhism, materialism, new age and Advaita, etc. We must exercise the same caution with what is called "Advaita" today and its exponents, as we exercise with materialism.
@mktipsfun156419 сағат бұрын
traditional advaita is very different from new age nonsense
@SwamiSridattadevSatchitanandaАй бұрын
Consciousness is fundamental Generator Organizer Destroyer Of ⭕️ = I = ♾ Dimensions Swami SriDattaDev SatChitAnanda
@pravdaseed6424 күн бұрын
💜☸️☯️☸️💜 💙 Thanks 💙
@ArunPotdarLeoАй бұрын
Swamiji, Pranam. My question is this: If the consciousness is not materially connected to the brain, then what happens to consciousness when a person goes into comatose condition where all body functions are intact and the autonomous system keeps that person alive but totally unconscious about the environment and is unable to function within the normal functioning? Does consciousness gets impaired with the damage to the portion of brain?
@rajaiafАй бұрын
Consciousness as the unchanging reality remains even when the body is comatose.
@rajaiafАй бұрын
The answer to your question lies in how you define consciousness. Consciousness as defined in neuro science as a response to stimulus is different from vedantic consciousness which is that unchanging reality that reveals your thoughts, emotions and perceptions. BTW, this is my understanding from Swamiji's teachings on his website and on You Tube. I may be wrong.
Rainbow picture Over-Consciousness, Colors picture Under-Consciousness = Day-Consciousness and Night-Consciousness. Instinct, Gravity, Feeling, Intelligence, Intuition, Memory, our physical body, is a Gravity-Body, at Night, We do Move our Day-Consciousness, to the Night-Bodies, (Deep-Sleep) one by one, via the Coupling-Body, (REM) Dreams, NDE, OBE, Coma, messages, Visits, Warnings, is experienced by Day-Consciousness, via the Coupling-Body. So, Day-consciousness Never sleep, it just goes in Circuits, Day/Night, and Larger. Our Body is a Organ-circuit, correspond with respective Bodies during Day/Night-circuit. a man denied that he had been away, after 17 years, within one year, the grey brain got pink. a woman thought she was still teenager, after 20 years Consciousness is 100% Electric.
@silverly0Ай бұрын
Try subbing in consciousness for awareness and read it again. "If the **awareness** is not materially connected to the brain, then what happens to **awareness** when a person goes into comatose condition where all body functions are intact and the autonomous system keeps that person alive but totally **unaware** about the environment and is unable to function within the normal functioning? Does **awareness** gets impaired with the damage to the portion of brain?" Once you do that, can you see how it makes sense now?
@108VivekАй бұрын
🙏🏼
@rekhaphatak9226Ай бұрын
Connect with Guru as Consciousness,not as a person.Swamiji is this statement correct.
@mkh2799Ай бұрын
🙏
@dejal.360619 күн бұрын
With respect sir, you are just only playing with the words, nothing more.
@Ananthan-m7qАй бұрын
How can jellyfish be conscious to catch its food?
@craigd123Ай бұрын
How do you explain Anaesthetics turning off consciousness?
@monikagoldmann891313 күн бұрын
Anaestetics don't turn off consciousness, neither does deep sleep. When you turn off the radio station, it stops transmitting. You no longer hear the broadcast but the station is still broadcasting.
@craigd12313 күн бұрын
@@monikagoldmann8913 either way, if the brain is the receiver, it can be turned off then bye bye
@nomanfarooq253019 күн бұрын
Lov from pakistan...
@holgerjrgensen2166Ай бұрын
Rainbow/Colors picture our Over-Consciousness and Under-Consciousness = Day-Consciousness, and Night-Consciousness, Instinct, Gravity, Feeling, Intelligence, Intuition, Memory. We are Gravity-Beings, about to become Feeling-Beings, Deep-Sleep is our Night-Bodies, REM is our Coupling-Body Day/Night-Circuit, correspond with the Organ-Circuit in our physical body. It is the Same Eternal Abilities that make 'This Device' work so well. in technical composition, Automatic, Power, Sensors, Logic/Order, (*), Harddisc So this is the Eternal basic-picture of our Consciousness-Circuit, and Day-Consciousness Never sleep. Life-Desire is Motor of Life, Hunger- and Satisfaction-Principles is Compass.
@sjstone7337Ай бұрын
Neti neti.
@SajiSNairNair-tu9dk25 күн бұрын
Awackaning self love😊
@esneliamunoz5082Ай бұрын
🕉🕉🕉
@darega03Ай бұрын
Un crack!
@user-en7qb5mw1k26 күн бұрын
Preperation, knowledge, knowing, process, and experience of consciousness - all explained in hundreds of thousands of Hindu texts, transmitted since more than 30,000 + years ago
@carlosluis82022 күн бұрын
30,000 years ago?
@himanshuchaudhary371818 күн бұрын
@@carlosluis820Yes because we are ancient, if you don't believe,come to India habibi😂.