NEW INVESTIGATION PART 4 "MATH WALKS"

[@LordMayonnaise]

Thank you GM Kramnik for all you're doing to expose these cheaters! You are the hero we need in dark times like this. Many who criticize you and your efforts to expose the cheaters are just hoping you don't expose them next!

[@LordMayonnaise]

@@zonk45 why would I joke about the rampant cheating problem in the sport of chess? Nothing funny about it.

[@sleepyjoe9267]

@@zonk45 having to shill on youtube for a living is indeed a joke

[@carlosseixas3836]

Kramnik is my hero! He was right from the beginning. And there are many more cheaters, like Hikaru, Daniel Naroditsky, etc., all of whom Kramnik denounced. Keep up the good work, dear Kramnik! It's the Americans and Ukrainians who should be banned from international chess, not the Russians.

[@louiscypher6919]

It's nice to see you posting your videos so often, GM Kramnik. I like to call you "Grandpa Kramnik", but not in a pejorative way whatsoever. To me, Grandpa represents wisdom and prudence, especially in moments of false information overload and noise.

[@FloydMaxwell]

Thank you, Mr. Kramnik! I will never watch, analyze the games of, nor support Danya again.

[@grimlips6596]

That last slide ( 33:00 onwards) is an extremely strong argument. Because, in more chaotic positions, both players will usually score less accuracy. Firouzja and Grischuk enjoy more chaotic playstyles than everyone else here. Then, why the hell are they facing more accurate opponents in such positions?

[@konstantinkaryaev5381]

Yep, brilliant point too.

[@Ism0Lait3la]

So many factors in play.. Magnus and Hikaru are the best, therefore its harder to be accurate against them than the others. If one were to blunder more often than others, they would concede high accuracy games by opponent.

[@charchitthakur7364]

​@@Ism0Lait3laexcept kramnik did not blunder he showed his average accuracy, it was 89, every 3rd peson he plays having 91+ accuracy against him is just not possible

[@Thepuzzle0]

I dont agree. The higher the difference in level the lower the accuracy of the worse player is going to be. If i play against people of my rating i can score some games with over 90% accuracy because their mistakes are more obvious (if they blunder a full piece i can take it and its gonna be the best computer move). However if i play a better player their mistakes arent as obvious to me, because they are not hanging a piece on every move. So naturally im going to score a lower accuracy against a higher rated player. This is in line with the table that you are referring to. The highest rated players (magnus and hikaru) are facing less people of equal strength, so their opponents have a lower chance of a high accuracy game. The lower the blitz rating the more people of equal or greater strength exist and are playing against you. And as i explained earlier, if both players are of the same rating or the player in question is higher rated, a high accuracy score is more likely. This would explain why more people are scoring 90+ accuracy against kramnik than against carlsen. As far as i can see the table just shows the lower your rating at a top level the higher your opponents accuracy is going to be.

[@Randomrando1]

Thank you for highlighting these suspicious players when no one else is. I appreciate your mature and level-headed content, which is something the chess world is greatly lacking.

[@eatinburgers]

Hi GM Kramnik, GM Narocheatsky foolishly said he'd play you in Charlotte if you came to town. When will you come collect the 50K?

[@VBKramnik]

Why should I come to town? I understand he is huge world star but maybe we should play on neutral territory and I would have a say on that? I understand, not even close definitely to Danya heights, but still would kindly ask to consider my point of view 🙂

[@eatinburgers]

@@VBKramnik Completely understandable as you were the previous world champ and he's just an "onliner". However, it may still be worth it for you to prove your point and eliminate all suspicion :) This way he has no excuse but to play!

[@MrSupernova111]

@@juliusjackson9198 . World champion scared of some online personality?? Hilarious!

[@konstantinkaryaev5381]

@@eatinburgers It's just not at ex-champion level to chase around the globe someone who only can get 2700 playing with amateurs.

[@sleepyjoe9267]

@@VBKramnik You should meet halfway somewhere. Why play him in the lion's den. He is trying to come up with an excuse to avoid you and flip the narrative on you as avoiding him (common DARVO/gaslighting tactic).

[@pantelis72]

Mandatory use of a 3D camera. The file must be stored for 1 year and be accessible for review by anyone interested using a VR headset.

[@myaccount0000]

Also anus molds, for use in you know, investigative scenarios

[@sleepyjoe9267]

Also lifetime ban if caught cheating. Yes even if it's a kid. Only way to stop this problem. Zero tolerance.

[@andresv.8880]

​@@sleepyjoe9267that's ridiculous for kids

[@SimplyChess_]

Please start playing TT and commenting again, it was really entertaining!

[@VBKramnik]

I am banned again 😊 so later maybe

[@opusdei1151]

Mr Kramnik, you are not a victim, you are Columbo. An anoying investigator 🤣🤣🤣

[@opusdei1151]

There is even an episode "The Downfall of the Chess Grandmaster "

[@sanyasyniushkevych1868]

Ahahahahaha. 100%.

[@konstantinkaryaev5381]

@@opusdei1151 That's a real wit! )

[@6a6yshka12]

Я очень сомневаюсь, что в мире есть шахматист, против которого ВБ наберет меньше 30% очков. Может быть Магнус... Но даже ему будет нелегко справиться с такой задачей. Даня смог. Сразу понятно кто #1 в шахматах, а кто случайные люди.

[@pavrvrreew]

We are lucky to have a legend of your stature fighting this hard for the integrity of the game, thank you Mr Kramnik

[@tenslein8977]

Levi's defense of Danya in his recent Kirill Shevchenko video amounted to "I like Danya, so he couldn't be a cheater." Sorry, but this is good evidence. Address the evidence. I doubt Levi even watched these videos.

[@opusdei1151]

Eric Hansen aka chessbrah said, not only Daniel is doing this. Yeah maybe, but this is not an argument against that its wrong what he is doing. People have sometimes a lack of logic

[@gonklmous1615]

At first i thought you were just being salty, but now im actually seeing what you are trying to do, these top GMS can do whatever they want and no one can say anything to them , chess needs more people like you kramnik, out of curiousity do you think magnus has ever tried cheating ?

[@Minerva6699]

That's not possible 😂.. Magnus is too strong

[@MrSupernova111]

Magnus doesn't need to. You have to remember that Magnus is the last generation to learn chess before computers got far stronger than elite chess players.

[@konstantinkaryaev5381]

Magnus, in theory, could have done that just for fun, but he is just extremely strong himself, so it's obviously not the thing he really needs to get him where he wants to be.

[@bjornfollin5056]

@@MrSupernova111 If all other players are cheating then clearly Magnus would have to do it too. Magnus is not stronger than the engine.

[@MrSupernova111]

@@bjornfollin5056 . How do players cheat at the highest level? Don't confuse online chess or run-of-the-mill open events with top-level invitational events.

[@rtbv158]

Kramnik, People have actually realized you just don't randomly accuse everyone but you are factual. The cheating must be stopped.

[@boogieman6529]

​@juliusjackson9198 there could be much more cases but the anti cheating measures aren't good enough. Shevchenko is one of those cheaters who doesn't have any smart

[@joelmitchell2861]

You can become world champion and an absolute joke IN THE SAME LIFETIME

[@Стас-э5е]

Интересный,конечно, сериал(я бы даже сказал interestin),но Даня ни в какое сравнение не идёт с Мурманским "Чемпионом Игры" ,обладателем потрясающей улыбки и титула чемпиона России по Блицу)

[@konstantinkaryaev5381]

Да многие "хороши", судя по всему. Но мистер Г скорее локальная проблема, а тут пора бить по площадям и массово использовать дихлофос.

[@barablud]

That's the funniest thumbnail I've ever seen 😂

[@andresv.8880]

I guess we've always known that kramnik had a good sense of humor, but i didn't expect these thumbnails and titles, as well as some of the cheeky editing throughout lol

[@ian27792]

Do you have statistics about Yoo?

[@VBKramnik]

I do 🙂

[@ian27792]

@@VBKramnik interesting statistics, in your opinion👀👀?

[@VBKramnik]

​@@ian27792very

[@6a6yshka12]

Who is Yoo?

[@MrMoeqt]

@@6a6yshka12 Christopher Yoo. The up-and-coming American junior who likes to punch random women.

[@louwassner5602]

Great video from an even greater player. Have a nice week-end.

[@polos7714]

Keep the videos coming Vlad! Love your channel

[@stephanecouderc2809]

Hi Mr Kramnik. A tentative explanation for Danya scoring better results than you in Titled Tuesdays despite broadly similar (even slightly lower) quality of play (based on average CAPS): the time factor in 3+1 may play in favor of Danya, who may be able to flag opponents in equal or even inferior position, while it may play against you (despite the 1 second increment), due to mouse-moving skills. Don't you think that could be a reasonable explanation for the discrepancy in results despite broadly similar average CAPS?

[@nicholas6870]

Kramnik's callouts make a great for great story lines in potential matches.

[@МаксимБузуй]

Keep going, this is amazing!

[@jankastl2114]

The pieces of the puzzle start to provide clear picture. I hope this guy is done for good from the chess world. All of this is good for chess, thanks for the work Vlad. Regards from CZ

[@drainus5013]

but 300 games sample? isnt that like 10 days of play for Danya? I mean, isnt it so that anything can happen in such a short period of time? The variance will be colossal

[@VBKramnik]

It is not de facto, OTB,and cant be

[@brainletsYT]

naroditsky is a hack and always has been both in chess and within his character. you never seen him playing any real pros otb, is permanently online, and always plays lower rated players online (and apparently otb in the latest findings) to inflate his ridiculously unrepresentative online rating. the conclusion regarding him is that he has a lot of explaining to do but he never will because he can never do serious wrong in his own eyes. he would take offense to reading this comment too because he knows that he cherry picks what he does confess to and what he doesn't. his character is closer aligned to a liar than a frank and honest person. my conclusion from this new investigation series from you vladimir is that it is very much needed, so thank you, fide world champion vladimir. i hope that naroditsky comes out of this with at the minimum a confession that he has to work on how honestly he lives life in general so that he can eventually tackle the more serious issues that i mentioned

[@sleepyjoe9267]

His reputation is destroyed, and rightfully so.

[@sleepyjoe9267]

@@MC12-ps6rh You are terrible at your job, shill.

[@zeimarunescape]

Daniel might be a pathological liar,

[@sleepyjoe9267]

@@zeimarunescape Looks like it, and he's really good at it too.

[@Mortlerickle123]

​@@sleepyjoe9267he teaches the game extremely well and is a fantastic bullet/hyper bullet player

[@GrafKarlsonskiy]

Vladimir Kramnik, все правильно говорят читком, нельзя сравнивать цирк с игрой в шахматы) и нельзя сравнивать козлов с овцами. Опять я поиграл минут 10 на личите, получил порцию "удовольствия". Жаль народ не понимает, что это зашквар. Так как в оффлайн турнирах шахматисты перед началом игры пожимают друг другу руки или fair play как говорится

[@musasiddiqui5629]

Any response from Naroditsky Mr Kramnik?

[@FRANKONATOR123]

You allude to suspicions with regards to Fedoseev. Will there be an investigation into him?

[@konstantinkaryaev5381]

You see, it takes a lot of work to collect data and produce content, so we cannot expect everything in no time. Personally I am more interested in Jeffery Xiong )

[@Juggler707]

Yoo woke up yesterday and chose violence

[@MrSupernova111]

He'll have a lot of time to think about his actions in a small room.

[@leobonart1638]

Рассказы читкомовцев о единицах процентах читеров стали еще чуть ближе к жанру тупой брехни

[@GrafKarlsonskiy]

Так на личессе такая же байда

[@happyrabbit7944]

Я тоже, иногда, "ну" говорю почему то вместо "well" :D я думал я такой один. Спасибо за разбор!

[@asdkpi6897]

Спасибо за анализ и сравнения)

[@rband300]

Thank you for the series Mr. Kramnik😅

[@diesonne0127]

Thank you for your effort. Maybe the tables could be easier to read if you change the names of the columns to: Name, Number of games, number of games against 91 performance, % of games against 91 performance, ...

[@alexlalexx]

exceptional work!

[@leobonart1638]

Интересно, а куда подевались анонимные математики, рассказывавшие нам, что Крамник не умеет в статистику?

[@Art8157]

According to the file name we can wait something interesting about Gukesh.

[@Frostgaming335]

По поводу оценки точности - кто-нибудь проводил тест этих систем ? Например сыграть партию на 100 ходов: белые делают ходы только по 3 линии движка, черные делают ходы только по 1 линии движка, но в конце партии допускают зевок. Кому личесс/чесском насыпит больше точности? Во втором случае игра проиграна, хотя игра более "движковая", но неужели точность черных будет выше?

[@konstantinkaryaev5381]

Читеры точно делали такой анализ ) Много партий, где идёт сплошняком 1-2 линия, а пара "зевков" уже не меняют исход.

[@twopiebytwo]

Do you have stats about another onliner "Nihal Sarin" ?

[@shrinivas105]

Unlike Danya, Nihal plays OTB as well, he recently got best prodigy award in GCL.. lol

[@tabletlenovo6443]

Hello kramnik love from belgium

[@MrMoeqt]

will you make exposures for other players soon?

[@Art8157]

Gukesh is the next. Look at the name of the file.

[@ungimmicked]

A non sequitur if I ever heard one

[@AlexisChess27]

Приветствую Владимир Борисович! Надеюсь будете радовать видео и на русском языке, либо субтитрами к англ видео. Спасибо за вашу работу.

[@gstar3062]

Почему вы показываете таблицу, где есть Накамура, Карслен, Фируджа, Грищук и прочие? У них же заметно выше рейтинг фиде, чем ваш? Следовательно, на бумаге против них сложнее показать высокую точность. Почему вы не взяли шахматистов для той таблицы, которые сопоставимы с вами здесь и сейчас по рейтингу. Может против такой группы тоже был бы высокий процент точности 91+? Это ведь было бы гораздо корректнее и нагляднее внутри вашего исследования.

[@leobonart1638]

У Кракозии рейтинг теперь рейтинг выше?

[@nickname5306]

Thanks Vlad ❤

[@Nature-of-reality]

Good work Vlad

[@sniper_in_bush]

what is this tumbnail

[@zeimarunescape]

We love Kramnik!!

[@janszimmermann4674]

He won against Fabiano OTB in blitz 2 months ago

[@VBKramnik]

1 game anyone can beat anyone,first He lost against Caruana,second

[@MarkMentzen]

@@VBKramnik He also beat Aronian and some other GMs. Saying "he's never really playing OTB with professional players" at the beginning of the video is a big manipulation. But very typical of you

[@egoforis]

Интересно, что если бы читер собирал о своих играх статистику, как вы, Владимир Борисович, о них, то его было бы почти не поймать, так что вполне возможно, что читеров еще больше, чем показывает статистика, хотя наверное таких людей не так много, но я думаю, что найдется хотя бы один такой человек и вполне возможно что это будет человек, к которому уже большие подозрения, либо это человек например из первой двадцатки.

[@TheSevenBridgesofKönigsberg]

why is your presentation titled gukesha? lol

[@alexke3273]

шахматы шахматы.. а не было желания делом заняться? ну там ассемблер х86 изучить

[@evgeniyp1976]

кэпс, нот капс

[@Pavel_ALG]

Владимир Борисович, вы боретесь с ветряными мельницами. И вы сами это прекрасно понимаете. С развитием ИИ попросту невозможно будет доказать живой ли человек делает ходы или бот. Уже даже о читерстве речи не идет. Это данность. Вы либо принимаете это, либо дальше бессмысленно тратите свои силы впустую. Если с otb серьезные проблемы, то про онлайн можно вообще забыть. Тем более online chess это гнилое явление, которое разрушает эстетику шахмат. Онлайн это пристанище для бестолковых мышкокликеров-флагорубов, разного рода троллей, и откровенных идиотов, повторяющих поведение приматов. Если вы знаете, что против вас ведут нечестную игру, тогда зачем вы позволяете глумиться вышеперечисленным над собой?

[@AllRockAndMetal]

На русском будут ролики?)

[@darkcitizen]

А зачем? Он очевидно нацелен на более широкие охваты зрителей. При этом его уровень английского довольно посредственный, так что большинство русскоговорящих, которые учили в школе английский, должны его понимать.

[@BQNES]

inspector kramnik 🔎

[@АлександрВоробьев-ф7н5к]

Жаль, конечно, что на субтитры для соотечественников времени нет, а ИИ не справляется с переводом. Отписался.

[@shelbyisback5104]

Kramnik I love you litteraly

[@MrSupernova111]

hello champ!