New quantum computers - Potential and pitfalls | DW Documentary

[@zhanzo]

1) There are various type of Quantum Computers: Digital Quantum Computers, and Quantum Annealers/Simulators are two major categories, and there are various ways for achieving those. Quantum Annealers and Simulators are more like analog computing devices rather than digital computers. They are the most commercially employed devices as of now (such as port logistic optimization, garbage collection optimization, patriot tracking solutions etc.) Most experts think digital quantum computers will dominate and transform the market once error resistant logical qubits become available. (10 years?) 2) EU is backwards in both categories. It is somewhat better in Quantum Annealers/Simulators. The leading (commercialized) digital quantum computer is IBM Q, and leading (commercialized) annealer is D-Wave, with various applications in defence and logistics (since logistics=economy, this is a big current application, see Dassault). 3) EU is playing catch up with new EU projects (as well as various national level projects). However budgets are still very limited compared to China and US budgets. 4) EU is heavily promoting PASQAL in project requirements (a simulator/annealer state sponsered quantum computing firm from France).

[@ForeheadPushUps]

Must be refreshing working on such initiatives. Meanwhile most of us will continue living our sheep lives

[@climate-moneymakingcampaig305]

​@@ForeheadPushUps i wish we could understand what exactly being sheep means, its somebody that "evaluate the opinions of ppl based on their authority" for example a person with a 1000 page book in his resume is considered more correct. We dont think logically to evaluate their opinions, in reality, from the appearance/authority/social position of them , we conclude the correctness and falesness of the statements. Sheep and sheperd ,they follow the sheperd even to the slaughter house. Knowing This one simple fact about sheepness can tchange whole lives and it doesnt need high IQ at all, all it needs is effort in going thru everything u know and start re evaluate them based on ur simple logic , common sense, it takes alittle time but it turns u into a beast of real thinker , this is why they say all humans have the same brain capability but 99% dont use it.

[@climate-moneymakingcampaig305]

What about chine ? Ive heard the google , ibm can only run for seconds with 50% error rate but china more stable with less than 10% error rate? Have u heard about this ? Can u explain more about it ?

[@sobsag]

You too can work on something like that but you have to study hard.@@ForeheadPushUps

[@ForeheadPushUps]

@@climate-moneymakingcampaig305 Idiocracy

[@delatroy]

Pretty insane to imagine we're trying to build a machine that can access an insanely large number of temporary dimensions to run a calculation that conventional computers wouldn't finish if they ran to the end of the universe.. instantly

[@marktucker208]

What?

[@ticiusarakan]

yep, technically, we humans invented portals technology

[@ahmetmutlu348]

i guess...as they dont give detailed technical information... what they mean by standard computers cant do is floating point precission . ie defining and storing floating points numbers on pc takes lots of memory and lots of time to do computations on them. while i guess they use electron states as ram modules. therefore on traditional computer one precise floating number that requires lots of bytes while on quantum bit depending on precission it probably can store lots of mbytes of data only on one bit... im not sure just a guess .. if they can set and get value of qbit/electon state :D im not sure how they set electron state anyway if they can :D

[@delatroy]

@@ticiusarakan correct. It's literally a way to open so you can compute in an almost infinite number of branches of reality simultaneously that emerge into reality when the computation starts and collapse again when it ends - all in a split second. Mind blowing shit!

[@brianm2881]

I'm going to use it to run SNES emulators.

[@ecocodex4431]

What people claim quantum computing will be used for: * Helping develop medications * Curing diseases * Storing renewable energy What quantum computing will REALLY be used for: * Global data breaches * Hacking governments * Mass surveillance

[@mute9914]

Mix of both,

[@astronut2925]

If not already

[@chazdean201]

Indeed. I’d say 7 years before we start seeing multiple blockchains being cracked like an egg.

[@comicdubs9923]

For a wider part of human history, anyone who imagined or even considered thought reaching stars was treated as a lunatic. But out they made the impossible possible, the problem with quantum computing is it is praticaly a blackhole one knows when were are going to get a result and people are getting impatient.

[@Ddub1083]

"good for energy efficiency too" You just got done explaining that you need to keep the quantum computer at less than 1 degree kelvin.... that takes a lot of energy to do. Until theres room temp quantum computers, "energy efficiency" isnt a thing that has anything to do with quantum computers.

[@cakapcakep241]

Photonic computing looks more promising in the near future compared to quantum computing which use a huge amount of resource to build one. It will probably the one who will replace the current electronic based computing .

[@ChinchillaBONK]

Current trajectory is AI > Silicon Photonics > something else > Maybe Quantum computers. Not in our lifetimes for sure

[@andrewreynolds912]

​@@ChinchillaBONK in mine for sure

[@catchnkill]

It never will. But I see some offload to photonic computing for some processing but never the complete replacement.

[@andrewreynolds912]

@@catchnkill photonic has a lot of potential

[@catchnkill]

@@andrewreynolds912 Of course, but never complete replacement.

[@georgeedgeworth915]

Schrödinger was a theory guy, he never intended that you actually put a cat in a box, that makes no sense. It’s a thought experiment.

[@lepidoptera9337]

Yes, but it's a failed thought experiment. It is a document of Schroedinger's confusion about quantum mechanics, though.

[@roanbrand7358]

It was more an analogy, to explain the quantum effect by trying to compare it with something macro like that thought experiment. But it could never actually work like that

[@privacyvalued4134]

Yes, but cats love boxes anyway. They are simply letting us know that they've already licked quantum mechanics and are waiting for us to catch up to them.

[@Irrazzo]

For the record, the OP is talking about the segment at 6:16. After having seen it, I agree that DW's attempts at tongue-in-cheek humor there, "primarily known because of a cat", "an experiment that he fortunately never carried out in real life", rather falls flat on its face. 1) No, he is primarily known as one of the founders of quantum mechanics and for the Schrödinger equation. That's like saying that Einstein is primarily known for E = mc2 and for crazy hair, rather than for developing the theory of relativity. Granted, popular science vs. science, I guess. 2) Yes, I am afraid you are probably confusing your general audience by mixing up thought experiments with real experiments for the sake of a cheap joke there, DW. Still, thanks for the great documentary!

[@lepidoptera9337]

@@Irrazzo One can easily carry out Schroedinger's cat as a real experiment. Even at home. It will be just as pointless as it is as a Gedankenexperiment. The problem isn't Schroedinger. The real problem is that it's basically 100 years later and we are still not teaching modern physics in a rational way to the public. Everybody is focused on intellectual debris from the 1930s instead on handing out the correct explanations.

[@Claudio-nf2lm]

Respect to the person translating all this Swiss German

[@neptunevibe]

You know is a DW documentary when at one point you hear techno music in the background! Ja ja das is Berlin baby!

[@TheMrSlyxx]

When people start out saying "no one knows what quantum computing really means" but there are now thousands of clips on youtube explaining exactly what it is in less than five minutes.... come on man.

[@vickomf]

SO BASICALLY quantum physics is my childhood conversation with my friends about what if everything behind anything doesn’t exist until we finally see it and there’s a fraction of a second where the particles join together by some force of nature (quantum nature) to make the illusion that what we are seeing is what’s we’re seeing. Got it.

[@masterblasterofdisaster]

This is amazing. Great work DW.

[@yvonneho876]

Do you know DW stands for don't worry

[@Amocles]

Quantum computers will somehow get tied together with artificial intelligence and give birth to the new sentient life form of Earth

[@alvaroluffy1]

we need maaaaany many many qubits for that, and for all of them to be of good quality... its like the difference between 70s computers and todays computers, but on quantum we're still on the 70s

[@cannabistalk4164]

If we get to the mid 90s we good

[@kyo250996]

​@@alvaroluffy1except now we have an assistance that wants us to create the biggest new house for them, and said assistance is already smarter than us (individually) in terms of knowledge since it can tap into all the digital documents

[@alvaroluffy1]

@@kyo250996 yeah of course it will be faster than 50 years, but still, maybe 10 from now, i think quantum computers are actually not the next step, but the next to the next, we're gonna have some major breakthrough this year or in a few years and that will keep us going for a few years more until when we crack quantum computers and probably nuclear fusion right around the same time, like, one or two years apart from each other or something like that and then will come another revolution

[@monkeydog8681]

Hey that's how your brain works!

[@德復汪]

DW Is A GOOD TECHER。

[@walking_in_the_shade]

Ohhh the irony 😄

[@troyarrington5492]

@@walking_in_the_shade”English isn’t my furst languages bro”

[@andistheinforitbutso7513]

New word unlocked Techer: a person or institute who gives info about technology

[@rendermanpro]

"Money was invested in research are billions" - and someone will wanna get it back with a profit, right....

[@lugburzhr8081]

What is wrong with that? This was told about Google and IBM - private companies, private investments and so - private risks and someone's profit. To make money you need to give people what they want, so companies doing their best to make progress.

[@rendermanpro]

Nothing wrong with that, right, except that these billions you will pay out of your pocket. This is not massive product, and heathcare is most unaffordable thing there, so tech from billioners for billioners. And if it will be successful *or not* you will pay these billions anyway "taxed" from other companies products...... your point is clear, but from these kind of videos, epic music, great intentions, they wanna say that's about saving planet, green energy transition, wonder of medicine, for humanity - but real point of this investment is take money out of your pocket. And simple example - some energy companies already charging "green energy *fee*"

[@rendermanpro]

"private companies, private investments and so - private risks and someone's profit." - and public payment from new subscriptions, fees, charges, bumping prices etc. No matter if tech will successful or not (while it could take decade(s)) and ton of money. Another points that they not collaborate but every company invest billions in their own project that we will pay off in any scenario

[@rendermanpro]

Long story short - many companies spending billions to create the same product, with questionable outcome and the main point astronomical tons experementing by money milked from the current end customers

[@lugburzhr8081]

@@rendermanpro This is called competition. According to your logic, we should only have Boeing, and developing Airbus was a mistake, we have iOS, so why have Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, SunOS, etc. The best will survive, we cannot foreseen which one is better. Money was made by companies that make those research, not milked, or invested by investors. If you don't like competition, look what happened with soviet economics, compared with the market one.

[@alfonso8843]

This should be shown in all schools. Bravo!

[@JazevoAudiosurf]

really do believe that people are not long term sufficient to write quantum algos and that it will be a major application of AI

[@ungroundedpilot]

Almost all hype and incoherent links between unrelated tech

[@ambition112]

0:32: ⚛ Revolutionizing scientific research with quantum computing's potential in drug development and disease simulation. 5:58: 🔬 Quantum theory challenges classical laws with paradoxes in tiny dimensions. 11:27: ⚛ Advantages of quantum computing in healthcare and medication development. 17:14: ⚛ Advancements in quantum computing for medical research and job creation. 23:11: ⚛ Implications of quantum computing on data security and encryption Recapped using Tammy AI

[@matstarcher7630]

When is enough enough? Whats the ultimate end game with all of this and AI? Were not able to handle our climate, economy, politics but our world is obsessed with devoting time and resources to this construct that humanity ultimately doesn't need.

[@Prometheus70747]

It is the only way to truly resolve those crises. Far from being a distraction. It's the only real solution

[@mrcazanl8156]

Little people now, this would be a change in the scientific industry.

[@gunkwretch3697]

its nice to see scientists admit that animal testing is both inaccurate and cruel, only sick people thought otherwise

[@imtiazmuhammad1096]

Thanks for sharing cutting-edge insight

[@PrestigeWorldwideNAM]

Badasses...All the best to these pioneers ❤

[@wclewis123]

We hear about great potential and how fantastic quantum computing will be. There are people who pretend we can do amazing things today however when I search for specific examples I am disappointed. What people talk about is the possibility. Let's see a specific commercial application in use today. The few I found use an adiabatic quantum computer that is a very different kind of technology. Could it be after spending billions on building a general purpose quantum computer a new way of computation will be discovered and all that effort will fall by the wayside?

[@JimSpencer-1945]

I'm fascinated by your insight into the discussion of quantum computing.

[@nikhilpatro6376]

It's all a part of the process. We know that new, or even better things take time and yes, a lot of resources will be utilised. It's just like back a hundred years ago when transistors and computers where starting to come into relevance. Early models weren't all that much, but still look and what we have currently. But yes, your point is valid though.

[@AdvantestInc]

Quantum computing's role in enhancing data security is pivotal, especially in sensitive fields like healthcare. It's inspiring to see technology paving the way for safer, more efficient medical solutions.

[@GnosticElohim]

No, it's about absolute control and the enslavement of the entire human race. Wake up!

[@thomasduggan8755]

Great work 👍 best wishes from Manchester Old England ❤

[@rextech-q]

As someone from the field of quantum tech, I must say much of this is very misleading. I wish you would have checked with scientists before publishing. Quantum computing has promise, but it's still a long way, and it impact is unclear. Especially in competition with AI (see protein folding via Alphafold). For example (9:53), the port of Los Angeles "benefiting" from quantum computers. Every time quantum supremacy was "proven" for useless problems, it was successfully challenged with a classical computer. Therefore, any "benefit" is no better than using a pocket calculator. For a much more informed view, watch Sabine Hossenfelders videos on this topic. Quantum Tech is not only quantum computing. Quantum sensing for example is underhyped and is already bringing real benefits.

[@mohammedsaysrashid3587]

Most wonderful scientific explanation documentary about quantum computer ,quantum scientific researching .thank you 🙏 ( DW) documentary channel for sharing

[@DWDocumentary]

Thanks for watching and for your constructive feedback! :-)

[@AX-sq5vm]

🤥

[@FARDEEN.MUSTAFA]

It was an academic and informational documentary about Quantum computer. If the outcome data of qubits comes with many 0s and 1s, it means this is a stage 2 classical computer. According to Dr Michio Kaku's analysis, the qubits talk to one another not like classical bits algorithm. In 1998 Dark energy's outcome data came with 120 0s and 1. The classical bits outcome data comes with 0.0001. Voyager 1's signal sent 32 0s and 1s. Is it possible to build 100 Quantumbits algorithm for a real quantum computer?

[@navya-s3v]

A DW documentary on new quantum computers digs into their remarkable potential as well as the problems they face. It's a fascinating look at how these technologies could transform computing while negotiating their existing constraints.

[@ungroundedpilot]

Why did they use videos of animal facilities from decades ago and not modern facilities ?

[@adroitspartan7907]

Bet none of the present Ai could give detailed instructions on how to build a quantum computer much less imagine it. In a world where the media tells us that Ai will dominate humans this is some Quantum of Solace.

[@mrcookies409]

Just you wait for quantum developed ai... it will develop better quantum computers... which will develop better ai... which...

[@adroitspartan7907]

@@mrcookies409 LoL. Wake me up when these halcyon 'daze' arrive.

[@mrcookies409]

@@adroitspartan7907 By then it will be too late >.

[@jasonderby7635]

quantum will be a tsunami compared to AI....when quantum and AI integrate it will be an entirely different world.

[@_Chad_ThunderCock]

AI isn't advanced enough yet, tho it's rapidly evolving. What you think about AI now will be a whole different story in 12 months. Once we reach AGI level AI then you'll see what it's really capable of

[@valterzc8187]

Some time ago everyone talked about artificial intelligence, but it seemed an eternal tecnology of the future, with no real advancements and suddenly in the last years it became a reality, and it is developing really fast. I think it will be the same with quantum computer, it will take some years, but suddenly it will be a reality, and advancing fast.

[@wsmith9716]

I swear, humans can be so much faster than any quantum computer or artificial intelligence! God has truly blessed us humans with a soul, so much greater and powerful than any sort of man-made computer technology.

[@readthetype]

You keep forgetting to add _“…if they existed…”._

[@lazarusblackwell6988]

Thank god for scientists.

[@perseusarkouda]

Thank scientists for science.*

[@DanH-u3f]

This is another leap forward in computing. If you combine Ai and quantum computing, you will create a monster.

[@JigilJigil]

5 Years ago US was the leader in quantum computing technologies followed by China, China was second but ahead of Europe, now US is far ahead of everybody else, but the Europeans have surpassed China, Europeans managed to do very well, the number of quantum startups, labs and institutes have doubled and trippled in Europe just during the last few years.

[@witherbossbros1157]

As they say with fusion energy, quantum computing is just a decade away...and always will be.

[@camronrubin8599]

So how many years have they been saying that about quantum thus far ,?seems like a pretty modern phenomenon to me. Fusion is an old school saying but quantum isn’t even something we’ve taken seriously until recently

[@MuhammadQasim-cc7pz]

that’s not a fair way to look at innovation. They’re researching something nobody has understood before so they cannot possibly know all of the hurdles they will end up facing as they learn more and more about it. Sometimes they make a prediction based on the pace of improvements taking place but ofc, they cannot logically know what comes next when exploring a vast frontier of science. You saying this belittles the value and significance of their work, makes it sound like a charade and you should really change your perspective to science. At least they’re doing something worth trying to achieve? The same was said of AI for the last 50 years and look at the impressive accomplishments of AI today, altho it still has a long way to go

[@gwizz4fs]

They also said the same thing about California’s coast line falling into the ocean… oh wait, it’s happening. 😂 y’all brilliant as a lump of coal.

[@witherbossbros1157]

In general, I agree with you. But on this topic, there are subject matter experts who have chimed in with reasonable arguments against what is going on in the research effort. I would encourage you to read the IEEE article entitled, "The Case Against Quantum Computing" for reasonable, contrary thoughts.@@MuhammadQasim-cc7pz Too many people believe science is magic, and that simply working on it for a long enough period of time will bring the desired success - effort does not always translate into success.

[@witherbossbros1157]

I will encourage you to read the IEEE article, "The Case Against Quantum Computing" for a different perspective from a subject matter expert.@@camronrubin8599

[@ChairmanMeow1]

I understand why quantum computers would be much faster, but I cant wrap my mind around HOW they really work.

[@NerdThingsAndMore]

Solving problems that today's computers can't fast enough.

[@adampullen3786]

yeah its fairly complicated, university courses are dedicated to that exact topic. so don't feel bad about it

[@codewebsduh2667]

The reporter got "quanta" completely wrong. Come to think of it, quanta hasn't been used to explain quantum mechanics since Max Plancks time. Quantum mechanic effects are seen clearly on the atomic scale, you don't need to be smaller than an atom.

[@adampullen3786]

"Quanta" is just a semantic thing. It just is the root word in quantum mechanics - where quantum is actually the singular version. So not quite sure what you mean by "it hasn't been used since Planck." Though I agree the use of the word the way the reporter was using it sounds a bit odd, as most people would assign something to the word - as it just means smallest piece of something. So most people would say electrons, ions, photons, etc. instead of just saying quanta, however I think given the reporter is doing his best and isn't a scientist this is nit-picking. Like the whole "smaller than an atom" quote is just for effect. Obviously you don't "need" to go smaller than an atom - but we absolutely do. The most popular form of qubit at the moment is an electron, which is very much smaller than an atom.

[@wyntoncolter1067]

During this informative mini doc on quantum computing this statement stuck out the most to me. Processing the complex correlation between all of those data requires the kind of computing power that classical computers struggle to achieve. - Frederick Flother "And that's where quantum computers have real potential." With AL being a new addition to apply to these different types of technologies can open even more doors for computing on higher levels. Especially with the production of A.I. microchips.

[@Mexican00b]

people who think "quantum pc" will never be a thing are the same people who in the 30's never believed computers (the size of a room) were gona be for regular people... can't wait to see what 30-40 years in the future will do... if i survive that long ofc

[@lepidoptera9337]

Quantum computing has been "a thing" since the beginning of the universe. Every single proton, for instance, computes the proton mass, something we can't do with classical computing very well. Every hydrogen atom computes the entire spectrum of hydrogen to infinite precision. That's very cool. It's also very useless. The problem is to make useful quantum computers and that is still lacking. There are fundamental reasons why it may not amount to as much as the current hype predicts.

[@JayDee-b5u]

This is purely a scam.

[@adampullen3786]

@@lepidoptera9337 Well a proton just has a mass. It doesn't "compute" it. The very concept of computation refers to a being using a tool to calculate something. Quantum computing is just using qubits (like electrons or photons) to store information like a normal computer would with bits. I also don't think you really gave a reason that it won't live up to the hype you just said the technology is still in infancy.

[@adampullen3786]

I agree we don't know what may happen in the future. However, there are certain physical limits you run into when making computers as small as we're making them right now. This is in fact one of the reasons quantum computing has some buzz - because theoretically it could break through barriers that the typical modern transistor is running into. But the physical limitations quantum computers have is also many - finding methods to actually physically control electrons and contain them is one such limit, as well as operating these methods at room temperature.

[@lepidoptera9337]

@@adampullen3786 A proton is a quantum system and it does produce a measurable physical property called "mass" that is very hard to calculate classically from first principles. To somebody in the field of computing that's a calculation and it's a valid "benchmark" between classical and quantum systems, whether you like it or not. So is classical chaos, of course, which not even a quantum computer can calculate. That we both agree that nature doesn't actually calculate doesn't matter. That's just idle philosophy at the practical level.

[@meahoola]

The good parts were only missleading. The bad ones outright wrong.

[@maxmordon7295]

Elaborate, please...

[@VeeDee713]

source: trust me, bro

[@rayrocher6887]

thanks for the report, outstanding

[@DWDocumentary]

Thank you for your comment!

[@gurs-2k]

There are a lot of documentaries that are no longer available on DW youtube channel. Is those are deleted for some reason?

[@DWDocumentary]

Hi, thanks for asking! Some of our documentaries have been bought from other production companies and distributors and therefore have limited online rights. We hope that clarifies things. :)

[@Hawkenshmire]

Computers were first used for calculations and now are being used for simulations, awesome.

[@Quantum-zi9hw]

bronchoscope fluids for oxygenation, articulation, suction and assessment could potentially be relevant to this hardware; suctioned fluids could be assessed with greater efficiency.

[@moneyfeinbusiness]

So when they say they explore "all possible options" at once, do they mean: that the computer knows options that we are unaware of or they explore all of the options possible based on the math it's trained on?

[@chrisking7603]

It's not trained. Simplest quantum elements take inputs... each of which can be described as having a range of probabilities, and produce outputs of the same nature. A probability density function covers more possibilities than an equivalent digital 0 or 1. It makes no sense intuitively, but mathematically it's descriptive of the behaviour.

[@crispykid]

excited to watch

[@ernestclark21]

Can someone explain this: If the whole advantage of quantum computation is the fact that classical computation's binary language of 0 or 1, and quantum being able to be 0 and 1 at the same time, then why can't we use software to emulate the same thing? Sugch as: the software uses a dual binary language where one side can be 0 or 1 and the other side can be 0 or 1. A controller could split the bits to each processor and in effect have the same quantum computation ( if both processors see 0's or 1's at the same time, thats the same as an entangled pair)

[@muddeer5383]

don’t get excited, ppl. quantum computing is just like fusion energy. theoretical basis is solid, but the technology to bring it to practical use is not even close. in about 40 years, QC will be in the same developmental stage as fusion energy is now

[@Christian-gf2ef]

When a hospital has a CEO you should know that money will save your life. 😂😂😂

[@e-learninggate797]

strong algorithms are required to secure encrypted data in the context of quantum computing. Traditional encryption methods, such as RSA and ECC, rely on the computational difficulty of factoring large numbers or solving discrete logarithms, tasks which quantum computers could solve efficiently using Shor’s algorithm. This poses a significant threat to current cryptographic systems. Therefore, post-quantum cryptography, which includes algorithms resistant to quantum attacks (like lattice-based, hash-based, and code-based cryptography), is being developed to ensure data remains secure in the quantum era.

[@lepidoptera9337]

Shor's algorithm has only been demonstrated for trivial numbers. If that is what you are afraid of, then you need some anti-anxiety treatments.

[@Capozzi3]

I wonder who is going to be the first to fusion quantum computing an AI. And what the result going to be?

[@HarpreetSingh1991]

Given that the laws of nature behave differently at the quantum level, how can we exert control over quantum systems?

[@SquashyPan]

Hi! Laws of nature work in a counter intuitive way but we have a very good mathematical description for them and we can test the equations on these quantum systems and they totally work! In particular, the way you interact with quantum systems can be devided in two fields, quantum optics, where you use lasers to "talk" to your quantum objects and quantum transport, where you use currents to "talk" with them

[@HarpreetSingh1991]

@@SquashyPan Thank you for sharing your knowledge.

[@acoustic61]

How do you input information to a quantum computer? In what form is the information?

[@madcaptv6456]

If only there was a centralized, open source research approach to this problem. Business needs to stop slowing down development by closing down great technology 😐

[@macombus269]

And in the meantime, I will continue to consciously consume products that are not tested on animals. 💪🏽🌱

[@adampullen3786]

not pharmaceutical drugs you won't... lol

[@srajjad]

What operating system it runs on?

[@lazarusblackwell6988]

All i know about Quantum computers so far is that its t he latest computer technology that is way more powerful then "ordinary" computers.

[@adampullen3786]

fair enough, the video kind of said more than that though.

[@mihaiachim5299]

Why this …t music in the background ?

[@SoCalFreelance]

Qubits are not like a flipped coin. They have a range of values which introduces errors.

[@marianasalles242]

I really hope that animal testing stays in the past…its about evolution without involving suffering

[@duncanildaho4966]

I dont get it .If general princip of quantum computing is simultaneously explore true and false possibility of equations ,for what the need cryogenic material?

[@Dawizbuffy]

To put the quantums in an certain state for computing.

[@ArnaudJoakim]

Working on my own quantum computer. 🤓

[@ManPursueExcellence]

How? 👀

[@CalvinCarlson-lu9yt]

I decide that I get to watch.

[@Human_01]

Quantum computing sees the manipulation of electro-magnetic fields and [quantum] particles being utilized as hyper sensitive calculators and potentially sensors. The potential of quantum computing is limitless. Their benefit is a reenactment of lasers; being a solution that requires problems to solve. Quantum computing will be compulsory for mind-upload technology, as well as gifting Ai with an artificial soul. Quantum computing only needs to be further developed. Quantum computing will make it easier to understand the literal fabric of our reality (and consciousness itself).

[@MrThewhore]

Let's see!

[@suniixxsav]

I’ve seen this in that “Joan is awful” black mirror episode 🤔

[@cavedon.felipe]

Being able to solve problems we can't even formulate: sounds like marriage.

[@duerf5826]

Four horsemen of "it's only 10 years away": solid state battery, nuclear fusion energy, flying cars, and quantum computers. Am I missing anything?

[@sokatsoi]

Very well done!

[@YNW_QI]

What software will it use? Windows or Mac? When will it be available for mobile devices and what's the price. ❤

[@Mahinegi-ui9cx]

😂😂😂

[@TM-uy4jg]

Awesome show

[@ungroundedpilot]

Virtually all relevant molecules are either not modelled well by full coherence or are subject to bombardment by water molecules that strip any larger coherence.

[@NarcisMM]

Nice!

[@Clancydaenlightened]

The biggest improvement you'll probably see due to quantum computing Is very high density parallel data storage and cloud computing, where quantum computing actually would replace server farm, but not regular computer Better medical and your car may go as fast as a Bugatti and make a Concorde that doesn't malfunction The problem with quantum computing is you have a "CPU" but no true quantum io devices still have to use a regular computer to run a quantum one

[@Clancydaenlightened]

No you won't be running GTA or crysis on a quantum computer anytime soon Quantum computing is what regular computer was in the 1930s and 40s Need a whole warehouse floor to run one

[@Clancydaenlightened]

A few registers and a quantum alu is pretty much wat u got Difference is Quantum alu can operate on all registers (qbit) at the same time with different instructions

[@adampullen3786]

@@Clancydaenlightened It isn't really intended to replace small device-based computers, and also there is actually cloud access to quantum computers right now! Xanadu made one a couple years ago and you can program it online remotely. also.... did you just reply to yourself? Twice???

[@JaxApocalypse]

Looking forward to post quantum cryptocurrencies 😊

[@adampullen3786]

boo

[@farhanaf832]

We can help scientists by processing data from boinc distributed computing software ♥️

[@alanfolmsbee4916]

A quantum computer once calculated that the factors of 15 are 3 and 5. Try to beat that!

[@nickplays2022]

Of course, they will “simulate molecules”… Or maybe allow the governments to decrypt your data which is currently encrypted

[@yuriantifragil]

Every animal deservers to be free and respected. Stop animal test.

[@PSVR2isAlive]

6:00 Fallout 4 The Institute music.

[@rifatsikder]

informative documentary

[@michaelrobinson9952]

Schrodinger never intended to use his cat in a box experiment to champion quantum uncertainty , he was pointing out how ridiculous he believed it to be.

[@robertherman1146]

It's amazing-it can solve problems we don't even have!

[@stefanxhunga1681]

🎉 Very interesting video Quantum Computing and site!

[@perseusarkouda]

Nice! My next upgrade is a quantum computer!

[@voodoochile7581]

I love the fact 6hat they are going to make animal testing redundant ❤️ This technology is going to change the very world we all live in for the better.

[@LeonardTavast]

Quantum computing will never common because of the insane cooling demands to achieve coherency. They are also only faster than binary for some special workloads.

[@delatroy]

I think there were recent material breakthroughs to allow quantum effects to occur at room temperature

[@Costa_Conn]

@@delatroy hope you're not referring to any of Ranga Dias' withdrawn (fraudulent) Nature papers?

[@nathancasey3391]

Cloud access will solve it.

[@NorthCalm]

They said same thing about classical computers in the early days when they were bigger than whole rooms

[@rextech-q]

Not all architectures need cryogenics. NV centers in diamond work at room temperature. So does photonics. Ironically, even "ultracold atoms" don't need cooling (at least in the classical sense). They use laser cooling, which is much easier, technically speaking

[@elvinilogy]

Everybody talks about potential.... Where is the result? Can someone demonstrate how it works?

[@chrisking7603]

The current quantum computers are too simple to solve complex problems. Theory has shown a path to efficient algorithms in cryptography. At the moment though, more complex quantum circuitry battles cumulative uncertainty.

[@valdroz]

love this mostly cause it stop hurting animals hopefully

[@chrisking7603]

There's more quantum behaviour in my fingertip than all of the world's existing quantum computers.

[@adampullen3786]

not really sure what your meaning is..

[@MozartificeR]

Thank you quantum people...

[@rahulav4009]

Good one!

[@sutats]

It's WarGames.

[@jaidenBenzz]

Great talk thank you

[@semerebaraki5911]

But it is not just two places at the same time it's infinitely many places at the same time.

[@adampullen3786]

qubits? well typically if you use electrons its only 3. Where the 3rd is just a superposition of either spin up or down. I will say there are other options such as photons, which can increase the spectrum of states they can exist in by taking into account phase, frequency, and intensity. But wouldn't say it's infinite as far as I'm aware.

[@notheotherklaus]

Amazing.