New Tudor Ranger - Good and Bad

[@christophernichols9387]

In my opinion it's clear why folks may be underwhelmed by this release, but if I really think about it, it's really what a lot of us have wanted from tudor for quite a while.

[@typebflieger]

Exactly. I can’t count how many comments I’ve heard over the last few years begging for a smaller Ranger.

[@vincentschneuwly9783]

Exactly: first Tudor I want to buy from a while

[@dominicrusho]

Saw one in the metal today - it looks fantastic! Size is great, bracelet in particular is a real highlight. For the money this is a great buy. I’m sorely tempted

[@Billeh556]

I’m beyond stoked for this, I hope it’s not as popular so it’ll be easier to get

[@mdesmet9111]

I contacted my AD and they have both the bracelet version and the one of the hybrid strap in stock, so they should be quite easy to get

[@johnozmen2147]

Great review mate. Just bought my new ranger yesterday and love the heck out of it. Get one you won’t be disappointed

[@roamy3605]

I was on my way through London at Heathrow heading back to the US 4 days ago (9/28/22) and of course I had to go into the Watches of Switzerland in the International terminal. Finally got to see the Ranger in person (my Tudor AD sucks and rarely ever has stock). They had the bracelet version and with the power of my US dollar (sorry UK) I was able to buy it at a really good price. I wrapped it up and took it home. Finally on wrist I will say that this is an impressive watch in my mind. I know this is supposed to be a re-interpretation of an older Ranger but I can't help but think of the Rolex Explorer 1016 from the past. This may not be a Tudor hit. I think the 39mm Pelagos and Black Bay Pro have taken that role, but it is a really solid contender for people looking for a great field watch, as long as they don't listen to the negative reviews. From a male perspective this watch is like a really nice looking woman who doesn't wear a lot of make-up and puts on nice, but not flashy clothing or jewelry, and can carry a very interesting conversation. At the end of a date you just want her! That's the girl I have and so is this Ranger.

[@mrfuriouser]

Wonderful anecdote- quite apropos! She may not be a "supermodel" but she wouldn't wish to be one, either. She is beautifully well-rounded and someone you WANT to spend time with, doing all types of things...and you wouldn't trade her for the world.

[@typebflieger]

Lol at all the commenters who want something “exciting” as if they’ve never seen a shot of a Tudor Ranger before. Did you guys seriously think it was going to have polished applied markers and shiny gold bits all over the case? Tudor has that already. It’s called the entire Black Bay line. Seriously, if you people were expecting anything remotely resembling bling, I don’t know what to tell you except to go see the latest Omega releases… Re the “It looks cheap” comments. 😂 It came out the other day and 99.999% of you haven’t handled one. But, sure, you’re the experts! I mean, give it a minute. I’m reserving judgement until I see one at the AD.

[@BruceWilliams]

Most naysayers don't 1) Understand the history of the Ranger 2) don't have realistic expectations or 3) sometimes don't have any idea of what they want and 4) will decide they like it after seeing it in person or seeing a good deal on a pre-owned example.

[@michaelfierman3256]

My point really goes to the point of why even make a “new” Ranger, and yes TBF, if they are going to make one, why not have at least something “exciting” about it? No one, or at least not me, is asking for bling. How about some proportion to the dial. Way too much empty space. And what’s up with the faux patina? Why not have a clean white? This is a fail. Falling into the category of “why bother?”

[@typebflieger]

@@michaelfierman3256 First off, I didn’t see your other comment until just now, so I want you to know I wasn’t singling you out, my friend. I believe they made this watch for the many people who want a watch like this. I’d argue that there are enough exciting pieces in the rest of their collection, and the Ranger was never going to be the watch to take that excitement to new levels. Tudor, smartly, knew what this watch was and what audience it was for, and didn’t try to make more out of it. NSOW said in his video: “nobody was asking for this.” What? I’ve heard people asking for a smaller version of the discontinued 41mm for years… People like me, who (as you know all too well) don’t want flash.

[@typebflieger]

@@BruceWilliams Well said! Nobody is obligated to like this watch, but I keep hearing all kinds of weird suggestions for what would make it better (a triangle at 12, applied markers, a bezel!) and what people are describing is some version of a Black Bay. All told, the reaction to this fairly inoffensive under-the-radar everyday watch has been unusually hysterical.

[@mdesmet9111]

@@michaelfierman3256 I will pick a watch with much 'empty space' on the dial over one with a 'cluttered' dial every day. There are several reasons for the faux patina; it's a heritage model, the clean white would look too hard on the matt black dial, it would conflict with the retro looking numerals and perhaps most important, it would be more of a direct competitor for the Explorer. So, it's actually a very smart design. I understand you may not like it, but that doesn't make it a fail. Tudor doesn't design watches for you, but for a target audience and although many people may not like it, many others probably will. I already own a 39mm Explorer and I'll probably get me a Ranger too, which I wouldn't do if they were 90% the same.

[@theenavybluemonster]

I’m a big fan of 3 hand time only watches. This is a big improvement over the previous version. The real life pictures I’ve seen of the watch look way better than the renders. Only thing I don’t like is the yellowish lume and possibly the red tipped second hand so I’d like to see this in the metal to make a final conclusion. Now hoping Tudor will make a t-fit clasp for BB58 owners to purchase for their bracelets.

[@jarrodlee1506]

Totally agree .I dont even set my date.its on the phone.love 3 handers

[@dimatha7]

I also thought white would be better but after seeing the version of ID guy the greenish makes a smoother contrast.

[@melcox1539]

I have it on the bracelet and was a little underwhelmed with it at first but over the last couple of days it has really grown on me. The bracelet has already been on my BB58 and looks far better than the faux rivet bracelet. My advice would be to see it close up before discounting it if you have your doubts.

[@alienlife9832]

To be honest I was underwhelmed until I tried one on....... it's honestly sublime on the wrist !

[@jectorlam1480]

I skipped the 41mm, and this is for me. Thankfully, not wait too long. I agree with you, it should be a rose not shield logo for this particular modle.

[@austinzizzi1142]

I wish we had the rose on it too. Thinking about getting this one

[@jimv.6631]

Totally agree with you. I love, love, love this watch and feel I have to have it! In fact, I could easily envision this being my personal one watch “collection”!

[@wisamal-hakim5531]

Your point about the explorer being a luxury watch nowadays is spot on. It’s no longer a tool watch. This is what the explorer once was. Specs are really good, heritage is right up there and the price is amazing. For sure I’d go for the bracelet option. I think this offering is fantastic if you’re after a luxury brand top quality military style tool watch

[@KeepoKreepo]

Think I would prefer it in a 36 but I can't deny it is a great Gada and I don't have a "premium watch" so it may be my first even still.

[@anthonystevens8683]

I like it although I've not seen one in the flesh. A slight improvement could be using applied sliced ceramic cheese numerals and markers similar to the BB Pro. I will reserve judgement till I see one at the AD. BUT, an in house movement in a Tudor for the price it sure looks pretty good value. The crystal reflection seems like a thing on the BB line as well but isn't a huge issue for me from personal experience.

[@SonOvaSon]

I was thinking the exact same thing just in a 36mm case, snowflake hands and a jubilee bracelet 🥵 but then it wouldn’t be a ranger

[@Not-a-bot222]

I like the current watch and like that it keeps its distance from the explorer. I too though wish we had it in 36mm or maybe 37mm. I think a rise would cool rather than the shield logo. Not sure why that’s not used anymore

[@edteach3r]

A beautiful watch, Bruce. For comparison, I own the 41mm 79910 Heritage Ranger and I simply adore it (7.5” wrist). For me, the larger size is the perfect size for a field watch, if that is what it is actually used for (as I do). The dial is highly visible in all conditions and it takes a hammering in its stride. The ETA is easily, and cheaply, maintained and I love the way how it wears its “battle scars” proudly, making it simply more adorable. It was highly discounted after being discontinued and it therefore does not bother me that it gets a fair amount of abuse. I will definitely be buying the 79950 as well as this is my preferred style of watch; but I can foresee it being much more of a ‘desk fieldie’/formal watch rather than an actual tool watch. This is emphasized visually by the fact that it does not have drilled lugs. Thanks for the video.

[@BruceWilliams]

Cheers Eddie!

[@_BLacKWaTeR_]

Tudor is the shield now and it’s never going back man… fact. Either way IM glad to see you are excited about this watch.. I really don’t get the people that hate it🤷‍♂️. Great video as always 👍

[@vamark7751]

Sorry if raining on the parade, but for around $400, the Steinhart Adventure 39mm. Readily available direct from Steinhart and probably cheaper than first service of the Tudor.

[@VMIyanks04]

Great point about some people will always look down on the entry level watches of a brand. This is a great watch and I was originally thinking about getting an older Explorer, but this may be the better option. The quality gap is closing between Rolex and Tudor.

[@dstjoe]

Hi Bruce I really like your videos because you share your perspective instead of just stating the specs. Can you please do a video to discuss the popularity of Rolex and the hype that is causing an increase in watch robberies across the US, especially in California? I feel like many people work hard to own a Rolex but then realized how dangerous it is to wear them in public. The watch then just gets stored to keep safe. What are your thoughts about wearing luxury watch in public in the current climate? I know many people who own a Rolex but won't wear them because of fear for their safety.

[@hillbillyartscrafts4367]

I would have personally like to see applied indices and logo for the money but overall it's a really nice watch something you could use for the rest of your life and I'm pretty sure it will retain its value

[@hambone988ubet]

I saw the Ranger in person yesterday and was surprise by the light weight (with bracelet), the fit and size was very comfortable. I did not buy it because the dial was a bit meh. I walked out with the BB59 Pro on strap instead.

[@therascals8237]

I agree that it's not a fair or appropriate comparison vs the newer Rolex Explorer.. they are totally different watches imho..closest comparison would be the older 1016 Explorer that obviously isn't available new anymore. Next best comparison would probably be the IWC Spitfire in terms of the field watch category, though the Spitfire is more of a pilot watch aesthetic. The Ranger fills the well-made field watch niche pretty well I think, at a great price and value.

[@nickdebenedetto2087]

This is my favorite release from Tudor to date. In my opinion, it just doesn’t get any better than the 1016 or the classic Ranger. Great design is great design. Now give it to me with a 36mm option.

[@BLR653]

This really is Tooltastic. I agree it’s way more of a tool watch than the Explorer 1 (which I love as well). This looks amazing on the fabric / rubber strap.

[@sacdubro]

The design of this model was just what I was looking for in my next watch. The clean unassuming face with a brushed steel case/bracelet and solid build quality that doesn't attract attention. That doesn't mean that I wouldn't like owning an Explorer 36mm also. I think they're completely different watches. The Rolex is more refined and the Tudor more robust The Ranger fits my style of a luxury daily driver like a Toyota Land Cruiser, well done Tudor.

[@davekizerian]

In person this watch is a stunner! Not for everyone, but a great GADA watch.

[@waterfordrs22]

Well done with this review. You get it, you’ve got a very reasonable perspective.

[@kurtnunn6116]

I really like this offering and I will check it out at my local dealer when I have an opportunity. I had the previous iteration Ranger. I loved its dial but was never a fan of the case at 41mm and the lug design. This model seems to hit a lot of the right notes with the new case size and lugs similar to the black bay's design. I wish they would have stayed with a completely red seconds hand. I also think they would have maintained its simplicity if they would have polished the sides for a little bit of contrast. The dial would look cool if they printed "self winding" in the arching fashion as done for the Black Bays with T600 movement instead of the straight across "ranger".

[@sebastien6483]

it's great that there is an abundance of choice in this industry...

[@authorjohnwquinn]

Great everyday watch at a reasonable price. I like it.

[@smittysmitty481]

It’s simple, nice, & the perfect size for most people.

[@steelsteez6118]

Agreed. For me it's too boring but a lot of people do like this simple to the point clean style so I can totally understand the allure.

[@jswede1]

Don’t forget it comes on a Rolex & Co bracelet. It’s a helluva package at $3k.

[@RagnarHoff]

Not boring, just a simple time only design with an obvious tool-like vibe to it. People loved the last-gen Ranger because it was discontinued. But now it's boring? lol.

[@BruceWilliams]

Lol seriously

[@jcb0920]

Owning and loving the hell outta my BB Pro, I think this is a decent, no frills, time-only field watch. For my personal tastes, I don't care for an all printed dial especially when you get into watches that are thousands of dollars. Yes, I'd be willing to pay a bit more for a few applied components. Great video Bruce!

[@marktroddyn3351]

Definitely have to see this in person. I have the first release and have to say this newer version lacks character. But again, I'll have to see it in person.

[@jorgerosas5138]

I absolutely love this watch! BTW, this may be one of your best videos ever!

[@nickcarson6389]

Great review, well balanced and objective. Makes a change from all the outright negative bordering on hostile reviews I've seen. I think it's a great release from Tudor

[@watchound.bernardo9738]

Spot on, I own Tudor, this opinion is coming from admiration. The watch looks great, built and form, except for the yellowish numerals and indices on the dial. I know it’s a nod to the original but looks off, like a San Martin homage.

[@chelious1973]

It's almost perfect. A little polish like on the bevel would be nice. Just a tad. But for $3000 with a in house movement, adjustable clasp, etc. It's a steal. Great review and a great release. Tudor needs to become more than a BB watch company.

[@BruceWilliams]

Definitely

[@dangermuz]

Price is surprisingly good considering it has an in-house movement, compared to the BB36 with ETA/Sellita

[@Kip78956]

Bb32-36-39-41 family now has in house movement with the S&G jubilee configurations. Very soon we’ll see them with standard oyster bracelets with full steel. They’ll be cheaper than the ranger when they come out I reckon. Or similar price as I’m pretty sure those BB models have 50m more water resistance.

[@MuchachoCarracho]

@@Kip78956 lets hope that MT5400 makes it to the steel versions. Im patiently waiting to snatch a 36mm GADA and the BB36 fits my design tastes, however I cannot justify paying 2300£ for a watch with an SW200, even in its T600 Tudor version. The rest of the package simply doesnt add up. However, give me that COSC certification with 70hrs of power reserve and Im all in.

[@edwardteach6157]

Personally I love the rose on the dial and the smiley "self winding" of the heritage ranger on the dial.

[@Peter-2704]

I tried it on today. It's all good except the dial. The markers are printed flat with no volume . Very boring. It reminded me of the printing on the Q Timex.

[@michaelriera6277]

Yes! Odd how no one mentions this fact.

[@diavalus]

@@michaelriera6277 people are into this hype for now, of course they don’t notice anything yet

[@BruceWilliams]

Look up the previous rangers and original explorers. Printed lume is the heritage. It's a large part of the watch. If you want applied markers you could look at the black Bay line 👍

[@johnmcknight459]

It would be nice if you could get one here in uk. Trying to buy one was told even with putting down half as deposit, I will or could get one around Christmas.

[@enriqueparedespinel1694]

A good specs/branding/value watch. Don't like the hour hand and would look better with applied markers.

[@jonathansmith283]

I am looking to pick up a , TUDOR ROYAL DATE /DAY blue dial . hard to find . that too has a good low point of entry. we just purchased a tudor royal for the wife , during our nyc visit. TUDOR is a good watch. ~ JDS/CT

[@matiasferrer4700]

I’m a 3 hand dial type of dude. Not big on busy dials or complicated time pieces. I’ve had the BB58 for a minute now & I like it just fine. I love the name “RANGER”, as in the 75th Ranger Regiment but, wholy cow this dial is just way too boring for my low class taste. I think I’ll pull the trigger on the new 42mm Breitling Superocean. Thnk u sir for the though provoking review.

[@samayoa95]

If it had a date, I would buy this watch.

[@rogerwatt8491]

The absence of the date is one of its major plus points for me!

[@craigwoolbert2443]

as always- great stuff.

[@mikeritz4547]

I wear a suit for work and tried on the new Ranger during my lunch break. I felt instantly this watch looks horrible when dressed up. In this case the marketing might be right - this watch may fit the rugged adventurer style. This is in contrast to the Explorer which can be dressed up easily in my view.

[@Benjamin-xh5hj]

I like this watch. All I would change is the colour of the lume to white, and 36mm would make it a classic. But for mass appeal 39mm is the better choice.

[@stephengarratt8027]

This is a great release. Imagine your not a watch geek , then surely this is a fine watch. Great specifications, heritage and under the radar for 2,000 pounds!

[@angelos6817]

Nice watch which I considered for a moment but I have a Sinn 556A on the H link bracelet and can see no reason to upgrade it to this Tudor.

[@markhiggins2793]

Hi sir, what do people expect for a explorer type field what , my watch collection consists of a ball a Sinn a Longines I'm slowly replacing lower end with slightly better watches 😃. But I have a San Martin explorer watch and it's awesome but it was $350 so I don't mind, sir how do you wear your watches without worrying about price . I'm starting to wear my Sinn more but for a while I didn't cause it cost $1700 I would like your viewpoint

[@AldoFelt]

Such a beautiful all around watch for me. At a great price.

[@KCTimeShare]

Nice review Bruce! I checked this one out in person yesterday and still think it is one of the most boring releases from Tudor in the recent years....

[@mattyg7475]

Can’t wait for you to see it in the metal…I don’t think we think it’s boring just cause we are negative to begin with. Gotta give the watch community a bit more credit. This is indeed boring in finishing in real life…especially the dial and markers.

[@jollyrob]

I was hoping they'd update the North flag rather than release another Rolex homage.

[@SillytanN]

once poor man rolex, now poor man vintage rolex

[@mdesmet9111]

I love how some people think a watch should have diamonds, neon lights and disco balls on the dial in order to be interesting. This watch is simply brilliant in its simplicity!

[@sebastien6483]

so is a timex

[@mdesmet9111]

@@sebastien6483 The Timex Q is brilliant in its design indeed. You cannot compare its quality to that of the Ranger, but then again, you cannot compare the prices either

[@jmac316]

I own one. So I'd say it was a winner for me. Now, if September's release is an updated BB36 then they'll have another sale on their hands.

[@BruceWilliams]

I hear the fall release will be the biggest of the year ☺️

[@jmac316]

@@BruceWilliams Intriguing.

[@jimg518]

Not a Tudor fan, but this one is great for all the things you cited. It checks all the boxes, which the Explorer doesn’t do anymore.

[@robdickson5902]

Great review, and I think a great watch. Can't wait to try one on.

[@BruceWilliams]

Same here!

[@fakenewsisthenews3542]

I like the Tudor Range Rover. Mr. Willis, are you a dealer?

[@trooperbill]

Should have gone with the double 12 o clock markings from the prince and had lumpy like rather than a flat print

[@ripperx444]

Great watch.

[@roamy3605]

Some may say that this new Tudor Ranger is bland. If so, it's always been bland. But the improvements that were made this watch are outstanding. If Tudor critics are going to criticize this Ranger for what it has become don't they have to go after the Black Bay 58 for the same reason. But funny, I didn't hear critics say much in the negative about the BB58. Did you hear; Gee, lazy design, all they did was make the BB a little smaller and thinner, and it's kinda bland because they didn''t change the design/color from the BB41? No, you didn't hear that. But I guess the Ranger is not the great fan favorite so critics will gang up on the poor Ranger. But the Ranger will not falter, will not back down, will stand up straight, fight back, and win the day!!!! From now on July 8th will be known Around the World as Independence Day for the Ranger! Okay, not sure how quotes from the movie "Independence Day" made it into my comment but there it is.

[@BruceWilliams]

"Welcome to earth!" or "hello boys, I'm back!" Lol excellent comment my friend. Agree with everything you say

[@denniskai2331]

Thanks for the take on the new range ... my overall reaction is that it's a little underwhelming visually - I don't think they're going to be queues for this watch

[@quickerthandrawing2822]

poor man's explorer ftw!

[@anonymouswatchguy4223]

I’m a fan..good value for money

[@davidskeeterskeeter1835]

Having bought 5 Tudors Including the Harrods black bay,,can assure you I will NOT Be buying this watch,, Because it is BORING beyond belief,! 🥴🇬🇧

[@michaelfierman3256]

horrific. I feel like I'm slipping into a coma just by looking at it

[@mrlong6267]

I’m still trying to understand why everyone on KZbin is talking about such a boring watch

[@lastminute2607]

I’m a big fan of this release. It’s not a beautiful watch. It’s not a complicated watch. It’s basic, rugged, and contains no BS. Looks like a badass on the rubber strap. Arguably better than on the bracelet even. Can’t wait to get my mits on one. EDIT: I 100% agree there should be a rose on the dial. Tudor ought to embrace the rose more. It would add an unexpected detail to otherwise rough and tumble watch designs.

[@BruceWilliams]

Imagine how awesome this will be in a rubber b fitted strap

[@SuperScottie3000]

Now put that movement in the BB36 and I’m sold

[@michaelriera6277]

Boring, dull, and derivative design. I’d rather get a real watch like the excellent Moonswatch.

[@steelsteez6118]

How are you Bruce! Looks like I'll be heading to Utah for a short vacation. What are the best cities you recommend visiting?

[@BruceWilliams]

I'm in Northern Utah. I recommend any of our national parks. Capitol Reef and Canyonlands are some of the under the radar ones. As far as destination cities Park City and Moab are popular

[@jodysilvia2]

I like it, its definitely a good value.

[@TheBigWrist]

The Tudor BB41 Black dial is a better 3 hander, and less money.

[@commander4068]

I feel it's a bit big for the design. So much empty dial space, feels a bit disproportionate. Also, consider the BB58's perfect proportions - this time only threehander doesn't need to have the same case size as a diver.

[@greenerick]

Great video so happy I still have the North flag 😀

[@EDHBlvd]

The rose is never going to be on a dial again. Look at the brand logo. It’s a shield.

[@BruceWilliams]

Why do they put the rose on the crowns of multiple models?

[@luxman9463]

The watch isn’t for me. My main criticism is the lame marketing tie in to the Greenland expedition which has nothing to do with the Ranger.

[@eljayr4669]

On paper this watch has everything and looks like a no brainier but on seeing it aft my local AD today, it just left me cold. Subjective I know but to me, in the market for a new luxury watch, a big disappointment.

[@gimusk5667]

I like it, if Tudor releases a new submariner, ill never even look at the overhyped rollies anymore

[@ozzy1154]

This will never happen. Rolex wouldn’t cannibalize itself like that.

[@davidomarmartinezcontreras3897]

For the price and history, better buy than the explorer. Not sure if will stop explorer tickle.

[@KC-bv9kf]

Lol, without my glasses on, I thought it was an OP.

[@jh-il5sb]

sorry, this watch does nothing for me. it would have been good of tudor to have included this release with another new model. on it's own it's kinda underwhelming

[@samuele.marcora]

I like this more than the rolex explorer

[@carzakone333]

Tudor is the best choice who are afraid to buy fake vintage Rolex/Tudor or unable to get vintage piece 👍

[@guillermoflores1245]

It’s a Working Man’s Explorer!

[@Geniusclicks]

Please the language “poor man’s” Rolex? ❌🚫

[@Jaycelestra]

Nice watch! The G-shock will always beat this in the wild 😃

[@alexwalker5423]

Once again a fantastic appraisal of a new release,definitely one of the best KZbinrs out there.I think all your comments are fair Bruce and to be honest I have a couple of Tudors in my collection with my Rolex’s and the quality is fantastic .For me and I think with many others who are slowly moving over to Tudor we were expecting something else in my case I hoped they would have released a Tudor Submariner in Ceramic now that would have caused an explosion of interest in Tudor and probably satisfied so many people who are unable to get a Rolex Submariner. Keep up the fantastic work that you do your an absolute credit to the Watch Community Buddy.

[@BruceWilliams]

I really appreciate that Alex. Thanks for the kind comment!

[@overkillbliss6535]

Too small for me but otherwise looks about perfect for an outdoorsman.

[@SaSpursFan]

If I’m paying thousand I want applied indexes

[@michaelriera6277]

Absolutely!

[@diavalus]

Indeed, even sub $500 watches have applied indexes

[@BruceWilliams]

😂

[@SonOvaSon]

Are date windows going out of style?

[@jamesminshall4601]

I tried on the last version and I really didn’t like it’s green markers and far too big spoiled it for me. I love the bracelet and the case is nice on this version but it’s annoying that it’s missing the smiley self winding logo and I’m worried that the markers are green. What really bothers me is it hasn’t got a date function, any watch without a date function should not pretend to be a tool watch.

[@davidcoleman2796]

Make a 36 mm and I'm getting one .

[@watchfalcon122]

probably time to give that rose logo a rest or just commit completely to the shield 100%. pick a lane

[@nartlambaz]

Many similariries with the Longines Skin Diver

[@borassictime918]

The dial lacks something. Maybe because all the markings are just printed, which is a bit ‘cheap’? It’s not boring, but it’s not exciting either. Perhaps it appears to be meh to some because of the black dial and recycled handset (it’s only one model, just with different strap options)? Tudor could/should have given it a bit of fizz eg an applied Tudor rose logo?

[@BruceWilliams]

Printed because that is the history of the Ranger and Explorer. Its all about simplistic contrast and not excitment

[@robdickson5902]

@@BruceWilliams Exactly!

[@borassictime918]

@@BruceWilliams OK, but I don’t understand what you meant when you said “this is exciting”? Don’t get me wrong, I’m not slagging this off, I just think something like the new 38mm Khaki Field Titanium Automatic with green dial (H70205860) is far more interesting visually and practically useable as a field watch because of its more attainable price (lower in-use risk) whilst doing everything the Ranger does as far as I can see. I’d be interested in your thoughts when you get the change to get one in the hand. Thanks. 👍

[@borassictime918]

@@robdickson5902 So, when Bruce said, “I don’t think this is boring at all, I think this is great, I think this is exciting” and yet he also thinks it’s not about excitement…which “exactly” are you referring to? Any new release needs to have *some* fizz; far from being “negative” the reaction reaction to the Ranger has been indifferent (if you want ‘negative’ see what people have to say about the new Superocean), which is in some ways worse. I don’t dislike it, but if someone put £2,500 in my hand I wouldn’t feel like buying it either. Maybe that’s why Tudor discontinued the last Ranger not that long ago?

[@robdickson5902]

@@borassictime918 Hi. My "exactly" was in reference to Bruce's explanation of the printed dial. It is common to the Vintage Rangers, the 2014 release Heritage Ranger, and now this new Ranger.

[@durandsimon5221]

Great specs, well built but the problem with this model clearly is the lack of appeal. There is something about this dial which is simple alright, but lacks this x factor the explorer or khaki field do have imho.