Nikon 35 F1.8G FX VS Nikon 35 1.8G DX

froknowsphoto.c... Click Here to download the RAW Files and read the rest of my thoughts.
This unboxing and sniff test at Allens Camera started off like many of the ones I have done in the past. This time around it was time to unbox and sniff the new Nikon 35mm F1.8G ED FX. This lens is priced at just under $600 and I am here to tell you if I think it is worth spending the money.
Like many of my previews I take sample images and allow you to download the RAW files for yourself to pixel peep as much as you would like. Being that this is a preview and I am just giving my first thoughts on the camera I generally look at the sample images while I am at Allens.
What happened this time was slightly different. I took sample images with the new FX 35mm and noticed at 1.8 a ton of vignetting. Now many of you know that Nikon has a 35mm F1.8G for the dx cameras and I personally own one. That lens is very interesting, it is meant for the DX but you can use it on the FX with pretty good results.
Since I noticed so much vignetting with new lens I figured I would compare it to the older version that is not even meant to go on the FX cameras. What I found was at 1.8 there was more vignetting as expected with the DX that you can slightly correct with lightroom.
To connect with FroKnowsPhoto please follow below
froknowsphoto.c... Check out the FroKnowsPhoto Flash Guide.
froknowsphoto.c... FroKnowsPhoto Beginner Guide
store.froknowsp...
Facebook: / froknowsphoto
Twitter : / froknowsphoto
Google + : plus.google.co...
Please Subscribe www.youtube.com...

[@froknowsphoto]

FINALLY i can see the video properly with all the information. It's only my video yet that was such a pain waiting for it to load properly.

[@mohamedsalah3]

+Jared Polin u made me confused ,, i wanted to buy this lens too much ,, but after this video i had changed my mind ,, so hard to believe this amount of vignetting

[@diggnuts4834]

mohamed salah He doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about. Just try the lens out and make up your own mind. Don't follow the shallow advice of colorblind near-sighted loud mouthed youtube jews.

[@mohamedsalah3]

Diggnuts it seems that u have this lens ,, so tell me did u used it in crop sensor ,, and what about this much vignettes in his pix!!?

[@mohamedsalah3]

Diggnuts there's another point too ,, that i can't pay money to try ,, i just wanna collect info's about the lens before buying it ,, and i know that 35 mm is great lens till i saw this video ,, i have a crop sensor so i'm going to buy the dx one ,, he said that it works good in CS cameras

[@diggnuts4834]

mohamed salah In what back water of the world do you live where you can't try out a lens for an afternoon? This is a quite normal practice. And anyway, If you can buy the lens, why can't put down a deposit if the seller demands it?? That makes no sense...

[@nerwin]

I love my 35 1.8G DX. I know Ken Rockwell doesn't like it, but who cares what he thinks. The DX version is such a great lens for the price. Probably my used lens next to my 12-24 f/4. Honestly, from this review..I don't see much of any improvements over the DX version besides the less vignetting on a FX. If I was going to full frame, I'd rather get the Sigma 35 1.4 art series and its not that much more.

[@karnivorx]

I love the 35mm DX as well. It may be my favorite crop-sensor lens. It's just so fun to use and I'm never disappointed with the images I get from it. Crazy good lens for the price.

[@nerwin]

RedSandStudios Its compact too, makes it great for street photography.

[@curtoegrosso]

I got one too, and I love it. Since it feels like a 50mm on a cropped frame, is a really good all around glass... And the fact that Ken Rockwell doesn't like it, make me love it even more!

[@larryhenderson6294]

I already own the 35mm 1.8G DX, I wonder if the 35mm 1.8 FX used on a cropped sensor performs any better than the G lens?

[@xxkrstnaterryxx]

jared, why didn't you put both lenses on the dx body as well? be nice to see the way they act on it as well

[@MegaRay68]

True that

[@savnac]

probably because the 35mm 1.8G DX is more than good enough for the DX line.

[@gsboss]

i came here for a lens review i got a sniffing review

[@Victorkapz]

gsboss nice to see photos of brick wall though right? hahahaha

[@pvolkspvolks]

I have both 1.8g 35mm DX and 1.8g 50mm. Although the 35mm very nice and is worth its money, I strong feel that there is absolutely no other lens under $1000 that can give you the results of the $250 50mm. It can compete with lenses much pricier than even that and its FF. Simply astounding. If you can find the extra space use the 50mm.

[@Epoque99]

If you want a lens suitable for general purpose shooting on DX at this equivalent focal length, you are either going to need to drop a couple of big ones on the wonderful 24mm f/1.4G (36mm equivalent on DX), or, the brand new 20mm f/1.8G ED lens (which is already generating a lot of plaudits for its sharpness and performance). Get either of these and, IF you are planning to upgrade to FX at some point, you already have yourself a beautiful very wide FX lens that you don't need to sell/ replace. For 50mm equivalent, I would still spend that little extra for the Sigma Art lens: I have one and love it (sharpest 35mm I have ever used). Though I am really unhappy with myself at the moment as I bought it very recently, dropped it on my office floor, and though all the glass/ body is fine, the focus mechanism jammed as a result of the fall.... Now on its way to Sigma for fine surgery and I am just hoping the repair bill is not too steep :-(

[@Epoque99]

At this focal length, for FX, there is only one autofocus 35mm lens you can consider, and that is the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art. Superior to both the Nikon and Canon variants, streets ahead of this f/1.8, you get fluorite and special low dispersion (SLD) and 2 x aspherical elements in it, focus ring is real smooth, build quality is really nice, and boy does it take beautiful images. Bokeh on the Sigma is beautifully creamy too (it isn't on th straight bladed Canon f/1.4 or the Nikon f/1.4). The new Sigma lens breaks all the rules: a lens that is HALF the price of the big boy offerings, yet offering superior build, optics, performance, and it's even much better looking a lens (if that matters to you!). Steer directly to the Sigma stand, and get the 35mm f/1.4 Art lens: it is the best, and, you save yourself a lot of money which is a bonus!

[@hetalkstorainbowws]

It's funny because this is one of the hottest lenses right now, even tons of people are selling their sigma 1.4 to get the nikon (because of the weight and price), maybe if you'd tried it like you should have you wouldn't be hating so much on this lens

[@rehabr2255]

Iacuzzi Facundo rightly said

[@ryd3v]

It's hard to believe this was 10 years ago, feels like yesterday ;)

[@DaveDiamonds]

Nice man! I've been waiting for this video. Would you rather go with the 35mm f/2 D instead of the new 1.8 FX?

[@DogRox]

Just outta curiosity what is this sniff test?? I never really understood what that supposed to do? What's it supposed to smell like? Hehe

[@karnivorx]

That amount of vignetting on a $600 lens is unacceptable, imo. And there is hardly a noticeable difference in image quality. Might as well save your money and get the 35mm f/2.

[@MattisProbably]

Oh and about how the lens feels: I always distinguish between weight and how it feels. For example, I think it is a good thing when an expensive piece of equipment isn't very heavy. Makes it easier to use and as long as the image quality is there I don't care how much glass is in there. As long as it feels great that is good enough for me. For example, I don't like that this lens costs 600 bucks, only has decent image quality (judging by your samples) but still only has a plastic body. They could at least have included some metal parts in the lens casing (outside of the bayonett of course) but a $600 all plastic lens doesn't sound very nice to me.

[@RayCornett]

Do you have a regular review video for the DX version like you do of the 40mm 2.8 micro? The one with Castle Grey Skull.

[@MokYiChow1222]

Thanks for the review, glad I went with the x100s and did not wait for this lens...

[@rodrigobrambilla4782]

Hey Jared, thanks for your video! I was thinking about buying the 35mm f/1.8 DX for my new D7100, but before it, I'd really like to hear, or read haha, your opinion about it! What prime lens would you recommend me to buy for a D7100? I can't spend too much, I've just got the 70-300mm... Thanks!

[@ZachKeller]

I use a 35mm 1.8 dx on my D7000 almost every day. It's my go-to lens. For $200, you can't go wrong. I bought a 50mm 1.8 before the 35, and I wish I had skipped the 50mm altogether. It's great for bokeh, but the crop sensor turns it into a zoom lens. On our sensors, the 35mm DX is the bomb.

[@rodrigobrambilla4782]

Thank you very much Zach Keller , I'll go with the 35mm DX then! Really helpful answer! ;)

[@chDiago]

Yep, I also bought the 50mm 1.8 and 35mm 1.8 dx to compare, but I kept the 35mm and I will never give it away. On our DX cameras it's close to a 50mm on full frame. It's super light, small and images are really sharp if you want them to be, otherwise throwing the background out of focus is really fun. Although it's slightly plasticy, it's my favourite lens.

[@rodrigobrambilla4782]

Diago Jagluiperd It's really good to hear that! And the best thing about it, is that it's very versatile, isn't it? :)

[@Langben121]

Here here! What everyone else has been saying, the 35mm 1.8 dx is brilliant.

[@RafaelTheMusician]

If i have an entry level dslr. Can i make it like a full frame with this 35mm prime lens? choosing between the 35mm and the 50mm and also d5200 and d3300. whats your thoughts?

[@ronniem6403]

I have the Nikon D3400 should I get the 35mm 1.8g the dx or fx?? Will be photographing my family indoors and outdoors and my wife modeling

[@schweinhund227]

Thank you for showing the differences from Full frame to DX and ending with a true guts feeling the lenses isn't worth all that cash ! most excellent Video! That dude that popped in your Video ? Didn't he see the lights? and Camera..?? LOL Rude ! all the best and keep up the good work !

[@newarr7788]

Hi there....I am planning to get a Nikon D500 which is a DX camera... I am confused about getting a lens..that will suit all kinds of photography landscape, portrait etc with a good creamy bokeh. I had initially planned on getting a 50mm 1.8g lens but then later found out that it isn't the same for a crop sensor so I later resorted to 35mm 1.8. But again fount out that there is both 35mm DX And FX lens. So could you help me with this ? Which will be the best for my requirement ? Thanks

[@hadencraghead2150]

Does the fx body lose megapixels when you put a dx lens on a full frame body?

[@overlander82]

Thanks for your honest and candid review. Looking at the samples you'd never guess it's a prime, an FX lens, cost $600, or made by Nikon.. For a laugh, compare to Ken Rockwell's review.

[@lemmor6791civ]

How does it compare the G FX with the 35mm AF f/2D ??? I know it is an older lens but it does cost only $389...

[@louaiello1493]

I have a D750 and 35mm 1.8 (FX) and many other FX primes. Recently got a D7200. Question is SHOULD (not Can) I use my existing 35mm on the D7200 or would the 35mm DX be a better option. The DX version has good reviews, is easily had and relatively cheap, so I don’t mind buying one if it’s a better fit.

[@lucast.mathews4797]

I'll go for the Sigma any day because its cheaper and the image quality is really good for the price your paying. Superb honest review!

[@antreasioannou3535]

hello Jared, thanks for the awesome work you provide. I am beginner and I need a 50mm for my dx camera. I got an old manual 58mm but with the crop factor is about 87mm plus is manual... I hardly can get 1 of 10 images sharp. so the question is, should I buy the 50mm f 1.8 or the 35mm f 1.8 ?? thanks a lot mate, have a nice day.

[@payastikotekar6531]

Hey Jared, great video; Do you think that the price will drop on this one in about a year?

[@MatSjo]

I was a little bummed out when they first released this lens since I had just bought the Sigma 35 1.4 ART. But seeing these test results makes me glad I chose the slightly more expensive Sigma instead. That one looks and feels more like a Zeiss lens, and it really gives you the results you are asking for in a fullframe 35mm lens.

[@dnlrz]

Hey fro, I have a Nikon D3200 and I was wondering if I should get a 35mm f/1.8g for my first prime lens? Or would you recommend another first prime lens?

[@skyborg007]

I got it on the same camera. I've taken plenty of good photos with it. It has plenty of boke potential too. It's at a decent price too.

[@tbrowniscool]

skyborg007 I am new and have a d3200, this was the first prime lense i bought. I got the 18-55 kit with my d3200 and bought a 55-300 nikkor then this. I LOVE THIS LENSE! it was £149 i got them to price match amazon uk to £137. best buy ever

[@skyborg007]

tbrowniscool Same! I use it now for making KZbin videos on another channel. And taking pics of my family. at f1.8 the depth of field can be very narrow though so it can be tricky to get the focus JUST RIGHT on peoples faces. You'll often get only 1 eye of the two in focus. The trick is choosing the one closer to you.

[@Ebenzification]

Dear Jared, I am a Nikon DX user, I have 40 mm macro lens, do i need to buy a 35 mm 1.8 ?

[@andycaper2825]

For 2 years I have been chomping at the bit to get my first DSLR, im in love with photography but have been stuck with a P&S for financial reasons. I had saved up to buy my first DSLR but the money had to go towards a family members medical bills even though i live in a country with supposedly "free" health care.. rant over :/ since my point and shoot is no longer working should i spend another 60-100€ on a P&S or save up again for a DSLR. im really unsure what to do, im young so maybe it would be best for me to just be out shooting instead of sitting inside waiting for the next 6 months?

[@rabbibienes5165]

experience wise, buy the 35mm FX and use it on a DX camera and get a very nice 52.5mm equivalent with hardly noticeable vignetting and barrel distortion (unless you're a pixel peeper)... :)

[@MedicalExamUK]

can you compare it to sigma 35 1.4?

[@lafaelastson]

I have a nikon d5100. Which one of the 35mm lens would be best to be used on my camera? Thanks

[@Pampaku]

Af-s 35mm f1.8g DX Hands down.

[@panzerfaustnl]

Strange is that if you use the DX on a analog F80, i don't see that much vignetting? Any clue why?

[@jsanmejias]

Marco de Boer I don't see that much of the vignetting through the finder in my F5 too, don't know why.

[@y35n00b5]

For another 200 you can get the Sigma 35mm f1.4 Art. It's more sturdier, sharper and less bs at 1.8 (distortion, etc.). Nikon has really been slipping lately and its really depressing.

[@TheHooHan]

Using nikon d5000. Planning to buy a new lens. Which one would be better? 35mm 1.8g or 50mm 1.8g Please advise.

[@Aps3FanBoy]

35mm works out as a fifty and a fifty works out as a 75mm on dx depends on what you want to do if you want to do traditional portraits the 50mm will be a good bet as it's about as close as you get to 85mm on dx the 35mm will be good as a jack of all trades lens it really depends on what you want to do with it

[@KBSheldon0926]

Take a good look at the sigma 50mm EX DG. awesome lens as well.

[@DevinDymkowski]

Have u ever reviewed the sigma 35mm 1.4 art lens?

[@cameramannaresh2968]

What is the difference Between nikon Ed lens and DX lens

[@stevenj2380]

Nov 2017. First Nikon, coming from Pentax gear is D7500 - tired D7200 for a bit and returned it- like D7500 more despite well pointed out issues- and got 35 f/2 D, besides other lenses 3 zoom and 3 primes FX except for 12-24 f/4 DX..

[@miike111]

Thanks for the review on the Nikon 35mm f1.8 lens. It is a bit sad that the price did not match the performance of this lens but it can be use as a walk around lens but not use in pro work.

[@Themoigt]

"when i walked to the foot loocker when i was working on the mall just to sniff shoes, they looked at me like i was weird , but..." best of all

[@TexMex421]

I shoot the Tokina 11-17 on FF and 1.3 crop, and it is great. 11 will vignette like crazy on FF, but you can crop that or zoom to about 14.

[@mayhem052]

Man Nikon, this is disappointing. I bet their marketing material claims all of the vignetting and bowing is for a "3D special effect." A prime isn't supposed to look like that, especially a $600 one.

[@idowuvictor1388]

Nice video here, pls i have a D610 full frame camera and i need a good and cheap lens for a wedding photograpy, as a starter i already have 50mm 1.8g but am thinking of buying the 35 f1.8g fx. Please i need your help for a good lens tips

[@justsaying7741]

Idowu Victor i got recently got the 35mm 1.8g FX and believe me, its a great lens. i got it second hand for about 300 euro's. (it still costs 599 euro's new) i started with the 50mm 1.8 then the 85mm 1.8G now the 35mm 1.8G and im hoping for a 24mm 1.8G soon.

[@SB-yv5lm]

Which prime lens is an ideal for Nikon 7200; Nikon DX 35mm f/1.8G AF-S Standard Lens or Nikon 50mm f/1.8G AF-S Standard Lens or Nikon FX 50mm f/1.8D AF Standard Lens or Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S Standard Lens or Nikon AF-S 40mm f/2.8 G DX Compact NIKKOR Lens or ???? Your comments are much appreciated.

[@DacLMK]

I bought the Nikon DX 35mm f/1.8G AF-S Standard Lens recently and I'm really happy with it. I'm using it on my Nikon D3100 and it takes great pictures. I think you should get the 35 mm DX sensor because the FX sensors won't let you autofocus on a Nikon designed for DX sensors.

[@stg5ive]

How about the FX lens on a crop frame camera like the D3300?

[@TheGermanElectrician2000]

smaller sensor, probably no problems there

[@theJaseEdwards]

I have a buddy selling his, to me, for $350. Still work the buy?

[@rlwings]

Yes but if you use the DX on the FX then you would still need to crop into the image to get rid of the remaining vignetting which would then make it a 50mm lens... Also, all the new G series lenses have the same level of build quality... So, yes, in order to get an effective 35mm focal length, this lens is certainly worth the $600. Build quality is par for the course. Don't hammer nails with it.

[@sprite1086]

Every Nikon lens since like 2001 is a G lens, and some of them are made much nicer than others.

[@ramonalcontin7082]

Thanks to this video, i bought the 35mm and its great!

[@donnlowel2387]

I’m not sure why he said this lens is too light. The weight and price is good compared to any 35mm brand lenses in the market. I know most lenses has weight to it but also the he price.

[@rabbibienes5165]

did that guy on the background just videobombed you at 1:17: :D

[@xxkrstnaterryxx]

Rabbi Bienes sure looks like it...lol

[@EverythingFilmmaking]

Nikon needs to get their $hit together..Sigma is outshining them at this point with certain glass..

[@leandroamarillo3262]

If i have a crop sensor camera and i buy a DX lens that says 35mm do i still have to apply the crop factor? is it 35 or 52.5?

[@rabbibienes5165]

Leandro Amarillo no... DX lenses are made for crop sensors, no need to multiply the focal length by 1.5... :)

[@PHOT0GUY]

Leandro Amarillo If you want to know the equivalent field of view of a lens on a dx camera you have to apply a crop factor. It does not matter if the lens is dx or fx, you still apply the same crop factor.

[@MurasakiBunny]

+Leandro Amarillo I always thought you didn't need to, but what I finally did was pick up crop sensor with a DX lens at 35mm and an FX camera with an FX lens at 52mm and looking though both viewfinders they both exhibited the same visual focal view in degrees. So your DX 35mm will look like using at 52mm on a full frame camera.

[@ivanborissov1547]

+The Laughing Rabbit So for dx cameras is better to get the 35mm not the 50mm? Am i going to get good bokeh?

[@MurasakiBunny]

Depth of field with always get smaller with larger focal lengths. A 50mm on a crop camera can make for a great portrait lens and will remain a decent lens if you full frame (assuming it's not a DX lens). A 35mm on a crop will make a decent protrait lens with a bit more emphasis on lightly blured out scenery. I have a zoom I used and at 45mm (was cramped and counldn't zoom at 50 without leaving too much out) and got pretty good bokeh with focusing at close range flic.kr/p/BkVNQr In the world of crop lenses, the battle between 24 and 35mm is like the battle of full frames using 35mm and 50mm.

[@johansmitphotography]

That doode in the background at 1:16. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 He's just like ✌✌

[@Ghettowill]

$600 .. I don't think so .. I have the 35 1.8 DX with my d600 and it works fine and I think it adds a little flavour on the photos

[@Liljoozy]

I have the same camera and was thinking about the same setup seeing how you can get the DX lens for around $150 used

[@Stainless404]

Why is Nikon building a 35mm lense which you can't use on full frame? I don't really get it... The focal lenght is not as short enough to justify that...

[@sebjean7793]

Hello, can someone suggests me a wide angle for a nikon dslr which is not too expensive and with a good quality? I would you to shoot interior with it thanks for your help cheers from France

[@MegaRay68]

Filter size for 35mm 1.8g is 52mm not 58mm.

[@adz8084]

I'm assuming the Nikon 35 1.8G DX fill fit on a Nikon d3300? Could any one clarify that with me? Thanks in advance

[@TheColdBloodedGamer]

Adam Voelmle yes it will. d3300 is a crop censor and those are DX lenses

[@ruffianotv]

Adam Voelmle That's the camera I have and I love it! I can't find a reason to spend more on a crop sensor camera. Im getting that 35mm f 1.8 DX soon.

[@piperpilot26]

On an FX body the 35 is close to a 50mm. seeing that I shoot with primes only, I'd much rather spend $600 on the 28mm f1.8G. that lens will blow your mind!!

[@SpareParts88]

On FX 35 is 35

[@piperpilot26]

Jefferson Peters In terms of field of view, 35mm isn't too far off from 50mm. What I'm getting at is that since I own a 50mm I'd rather go a little wider and get the 28mm f1.8G instead of the 35mm. To me the 35 isn't that far off from the 50mm.

[@pass-my-test]

I drifted off sorry. What's your conclusion?

[@wanderingphotog]

Jared, do an unboxing and sniff test of a Leica M240! Just for the hell of it.

[@dcmartns]

I'm happy with my 35 f/2 :)

[@TechTimeGames]

1:16 just that guy in the back lol..

[@yoshimura11000]

Kamera????

[@berto1999]

A DX lens on a full frame camera always produces vignetting, is a law of physics.

[@TheDyingFox]

This is a tough decision... FX is definitely overpriced for its performance and the DX has double the ammount of chromatic aberration if anything except f1.8 is used, that is around 1 pixel, making it quite noticable... (where the FX has 0.6 and below)... But then again, there is no CA test for the FX on a Crop Sensor, so that could be worse... Maybe there are better options now in 2016.

[@stevejobs101]

For the price, I'd go with a Sigma... The DX isn't that bad in reality after a little post processing.

[@froknowsphoto]

Yea the sigma for a little more could be an nice option.

[@MrNickhoover]

Soooo happy to see you back in Allen's! I love videos like that. They are why I subscribed!

[@crxracer805]

Pretty disappointing. Did they not test the lens beforehand?

[@beavertown2006]

Nikon has been like this putting sky high price tags to their lenses. So disappointed also about the price of the new FX 20mm f1.8

[@MattisProbably]

Wow, that is a LOT of vignetting for 600 bucks! You buy this lens so you don't have vignetting comapred to the DX version, what were they thinking when they released this thing? I shot the DX version on an FX camera (film to be precise) and the vignetting was ok. It actually looked pretty neat on some photos. But the images were also sharp, that's what I care about. The vignetting can be fully corrected as it seems but still, I think this is a pretty disappointing lens...

[@TVBlackStone]

so i dont need afull frame cams or FX lenses thx for this video.

[@cary5822]

I wish I would have found this video a week ago lol I had to return the 35dx too much vignetting for my d750 too much correcting on Lr😅

[@christyrobinson9424]

Is this the lens you recommend on your Nikon D3200 review video? Yea or nay? Yikes!

[@EllaEquestrian]

I got this lens for Christmas in a couple of weeks and I have a the d3200! Please make a review video!!

[@kingalias]

looks like you're better off spending the extra $300 for the Sigma 35mm 1.4

[@Rusty1995_]

I agree $399 id rather buy a sigma 85mm F/1.4

[@mattandhisnikon]

Spend $100 more ($700) and get the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 A, which is better than the L series Canon 35mm f/1.4 and Nikon's Pro 35mm f/1.4

[@ItsYourDistraction]

I 110% agree. I was actually looking at these two models recently, and I felt the 1.8g was kind of scamy.

[@froknowsphoto]

Just over priced.

[@FINDaCHANNEL]

personally i think they ask $600 is because they can

[@MrGeorgeKav]

idea: what if you crop the photo using PS

[@QRNPTBUZ]

Get the Sigma 35 f1.4 instead!

[@MrYunsi]

Odd issue here, some of your videos won't play the audio tracks and I can't hear jackshit! Occurs only on some videos though and all other youtube content is fine. It Only happens for your videos. Whats going on?

[@froknowsphoto]

For whatever reason KZbin is really screwing the pooch on this one. I had all the info, went public and it tells me it's still private and stripped all my info. So not sure whats going on.

[@MrYunsi]

Jared Polin I appreciate your content very much and I'm a big follower already but that happens on alot of your videos which makes me sad because then I'm forced to skip it.

[@MrYunsi]

MrYunsi well this is awkward. Issue was on my end with a youtube plugin. I apologize and I'm happy that I can watch all the content now that I missed!

[@froknowsphoto]

MrYunsi exactly please don't blame me.

[@killer-beas3074]

Is it weird that now i can't wait for my lenses to get here just so I can smell them.....lol

[@brandonj8018]

lol

[@DerMBen]

Yes

[@MrGeorgeKav]

idea: what if you crop the photo using PS 👌😉

[@EnergYbomB]

Oh no Nikon, what do you do?

[@photoboy2005]

I would grab a 35mm 2D

[@thundershots974]

For $200 dollars more get the Sigma 18-35 1.8 and forget about it.

[@carlodeceglie6376]

For you it’s always too expensive...

[@WillenyAlmeida]

JaredPolin eu fotografo em RAW n__n Brasil - Crato - Ceará

[@DerlisRuizDiazR]

Why does he smell the things? Every time :|

[@Ketan74847]

i have the same que.

[@thatlinter]

inspired by Gary Vaynerchuck much? ala Wine library TV

[@BenjaminRootPhoto]

Haha in the background at 01:16

[@ZiadAmerr]

That guy at 1:17

[@arpadsarf6864]

1:16 tho

[@youravantgarde]

I was so excited for this lens and now I'm so disappointed. Wtf nikon.

[@2fadedphotostv]

I got mine for $190

[@tracyhawley8829]

Walked into foot locker to smell shoes??