NO CHEATING RECAP DING-GUKESH GAME 5

[@VBKramnik]

Min 10.30 blundered after Ne8 Nd7,Re8,sorry just noticed Ra6 instead 😊

[@MrGanzGeheimnisvoll]

if u write 10:30 with this double points it will be a klickable link to the moment in your video. thx for ur work.

[@M-uk1wo]

No worries, even if there are mistakes this is so much better than other commentators that read computer line like zombies

[@kramnikstudentc24]

Good work switching to Lichess :)

[@VBKramnik]

Yeah thanks

[@Cheats_Detected]

NO CHEATING RECAP should become a standard. I always find it funny when people ask players questions in interview segments, such as: "Why didn't Ding/Gukesh play the "xyz" move in this particular position?" Of course they would never have thought of it themselves without the engine, but by askin these questions, they put the players in an uncomfortable position while pretending, or hoping, to be perceived smarter than they actually are, naively thinking no one will realize that their questions are actually suggested by the stockfish. Even their creativity in journalism has been replaced by the engine. It's just sad where all this is going, but it's good to have an alternative like this here!

[@gunnersg2700]

i don't know why you think that the interviewers think that nobody thinks that the moves are engine moves. To me, it seems likely that the interviewers know that everybody knows that the moves are engine moves. Still, i always appreciate and pay attention to such questions, because we get insight into the minds of the players. For example, we learn that in game 3, Ding missed the engine move 23. Ne2. Kramnik agreed that Ne2 isn't an easy move to see in advance, and showed us why he still thinks 18... Rh5 is very strange. So, both the human and the objective perspectives are very interesting

[@M-uk1wo]

This is a fantastic series. Chess commentary has been destroyed by engines. Commentators have become complete zombies to the engine. Human analysis by a strong player is much more helpful to the average viewer than computer lines.

[@polos7714]

Love the champs commentary. Great to see how one of the all time great thinks. It's quite fascinating

[@adelahmetgaleev4118]

Когда дело касается шахмат Владимир Борисович делает топ контент! Огромное Вам спасибо за то, что делаете анализ без движков. Это просто глоток свежего воздуха!

[@julo626]

Thank you Mr. Kramnik, this video series is absolutely wonderful. It is an honor and a pleasure to hear you share your masterful knowledge. A French fan (nothing to see with the defense 😊).

[@Jona-u8z]

Only now had time to watch the recap. Great work and entertainment, thank you a lot! :D

[@PetrovOleg-t1t]

Владимир Борисович спасибо вам за потраченное вами время на эти обзоры партий! Отличная идея анализировать партии на личесс! Возможно ли в следующий раз сделать доску немного больше? Для этого можно увеличить масштаб веб страницы. Для этого достаточно нажать комбинацию клавиш « ctrl» и «+» одновременно. Вернуться обратно можно нажав сочетание клавиш ctrl и - .

[@OmkarChakradeo]

Thank you Vlad, Only good move of the day was moving to lichess

[@asdkpi6897]

Спасибо большое! Стараюсь учиться, чтобы обыграть мужа. Но пока не выходит. Так что выкладывайте еще такие видео с разборами, они мне должны помочь в моей борьбе ( хотя бы за ничью) 😂

[@ChuckNorrieS]

"Hikaru top 5 Kramnik Insults" in the pin bar . What will Hikaru do when Kramnik will come for him? ....

[@RobertJBrazeau]

Fantastic analysis. Love that you don't use the engine.

[@vikramaditya47_]

Always delighted to see review by you. Also good that you moved to lichess 👍

[@pierQRzt180]

I may not agree on your cheating crusade but the recaps are golden. Hopefully you will keep doing recaps of major tournaments (current or past). Really nice.

[@syonnain]

"Probably theory" - the famous Anish Giri Chessable course on the French, yes.

[@kramnikstudentc24]

Loyal Anish fan marketing his courses. I recommend Understanding Chess Openings by Kramnik on Chessable

[@dark_magician_sdy]

You are a legend !

[@andrelelis7035]

Mr. Krmanik, I believe Ding is playing very well, but he is not pushing for victories. I don't understand why. On the other hand, Gukesh is in a below level than we expected.

[@whitegoldsilver]

Yes again a very constructive Analyse without engine help. And thanks for your opinion at the end of the video. As an amateur, I think now Ding Liren‘s team knows that Gukesh is beatable in positional chess. Game 6 Ding must win. And most probably with 1. e4

[@ethanguo4219]

It's clear ding's strategy is to play boring chess to bait gukesh and threaten to go to tiebreaks where ding is 120 elo higher rated

[@Craftworld_patriot]

Every game of this match proofs that Carlsen-Caruana was the best match ever in terms of the quality of games

[@sugavanambalasubramanian8536]

Vlad big fan of you from India! Really like your insights and comments!!! 👍👍👍👍

[@fathanthoriq2413]

Thanks, for me you're the goat❤

[@GAMEKING51]

10:30 Ne8 not possible because of Nxd7 Bxd7 Rxe8 Rxe8 Bxd6+...Kramnik should not be missing simple tactics like this

[@VBKramnik]

@@GAMEKING51 mentioned above already Any chance I can get you record it? 😉

[@asefkhalili-v2r]

Thanks for effective lessons

[@Sisyphus64]

"A simple player like me" 🤣🤣

[@MetalYarick89]

Почему Дин в позиции без риска не мучал Гукеша еще 20-30 ходов? Завтра же будет играть белыми и можно соперника, так замордовать что в следующей игре он может играть хуже...

[@RockyMoony]

All the other commentators I've seen so far do their analysis based on engines. So far that's fine. But many of them criticize the players strongly because they don't play the moves of the engines in crucial situations. In my opinion, this kind of commentary is simply disrespectful to the players.

[@varishnakov]

Hello, Mr. Kramnik. It might be easier for viewers to see the position if the variation arrows did not appear. They can be turned off by clicking the hamburger button menu in the bottom right and unchecking "show variation arrows", but whatever your preference, it is an option. I am enjoying watching your coverage of the match!

[@bcdefg]

thanks for all these recap videos

[@psyleha]

Владимир Борисыч, хорош уже на английском, давай уже для самых преданных фанатов на русском!

[@miosilver9718]

Во время матча с Яном вы тоже говорили, что Динг слишком стандартный шахматист.

[@scarecrow1488]

I guess in 28:02 after Rb8 black could play Bc8, but it would still be a very difficult endgame for both sides.

[@VBKramnik]

Correct,but quite close to a draw anyways

[@dark_magician_sdy]

Hello 👋

[@HussainYasseen]

Keep Up The Great Work , Also Lichess Board Looks much better (:

[@vespian2023]

Good video

[@a230mn]

Вэри гуд обзоришен! Сэнкью вэри мач!

[@rtt1961]

The Fischer-Bishop :)

[@ym276]

Seems like neither player is able to get an advantage with white.

[@sachinkumar-rk9df]

Honestly this content is goldmine.

[@-DistantHorizons-]

Can I ask why you always start the game analysis from Ding's perspective? Not complaining, just curious. Are you a fan of Ding? I root for Gukesh btw. I love watching your game reviews, you are the best at it. Much respect to you sir.

[@VBKramnik]

Thank you I prefer having perspective of the side whose position I like more :)

[@prabhatkiranmukherje]

@@VBKramnik Yes! I noticed in Game 1 you switched to Gukesh's perspective when he was having a nice position out of the opening.

[@kartavyaapurwa-z2q]

Thanks sir 🍿👍

[@BattleheartDLS]

this is brilliant, GM Kramnik!

[@gusevpianoeng]

Владимир Борисович, большое спасибо, очень интересно и приятно сделано

[@percyweasley9301]

Thanks 😊

[@catplayscatalan956]

Haven't seen lichess light theme in long time, feels like they're trying to blind me

[@VBKramnik]

I rather feel chesscom tries to blind everyone 😊

[@catplayscatalan956]

@VBKramnik 😂

[@UAdair]

#Kramnik

[@МаксимВласихин-ж6з]

Акцент рязанский

[@IgnatiusC650]

Thanks, Vlada

[@pavel5213]

Жаль, на русском нет ваших обзоров(((