110% agree with you. Ban companions in constructed, undo nerf so you can get the most of them while having the challenge of building around them in limited.
@TrapdoorSocial6 күн бұрын
Go Jim!
@murdockberk88887 күн бұрын
One neat thing about Companions being nerfed and banned af is they are all super cheap to get a set of for cubes, and i feel like building a cube that revolved around each companions ability would be neat
@flamaster17577 күн бұрын
Really boggles my mind 😎
@TobiasCara-r3f3 күн бұрын
Appreciate the detailed breakdown! Could you help me with something unrelated: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How can I transfer them to Binance?
@CoastalWizard7 күн бұрын
Filmed before the Jegantha Ban?
@kyuuno6 күн бұрын
ayay nice deck. reminds me of some old age when bogles was a real thing in modern. btw i coudlnt find a link to a decklist on the description, i even tried most of those links
@cjs667 күн бұрын
Some sub-optimal play from that last opponent....but hey! Nice deck.
@dcmag2020Күн бұрын
I still hold Companion as a mechanic would be fine if they had designed the cards better. Even potentially with the old companion rule. In particular, the restrictions should be strict enough that there should never be a “free” companion, and at least half of them did it perfectly. Umori, Keruga, Lutri, Obosh, Gyruda, and Zirda are all powerful, but you have to make serious concessions in deck building to include them. A few even saw limited modern play, but were never dominant. The problem is only with the cards where the restriction is easy to hit anyway. Jegantha is, I think, the greatest offender on this. If Lurrus had checked every card and not just permanents he may have been ok, although even then he may have been too strong. Kaheera is mostly fine although her appearance in creatureless decks is suspicious. And Yorion was easier than a lot of people expected.
@walrusassociation93176 күн бұрын
Mulligan on removing companion. You shouldn't remove an ability from a card in paper
@exposfan94movies6 күн бұрын
"Reading is not my strong suit." (says the English major, hahaha)
@MyschaCannon6 күн бұрын
where is the decklist my man?
@Valdreag177 күн бұрын
Took Sram to Top 8 off of a 12-0 run. That’s the whole story.
@andrewp67387 күн бұрын
jim put your glasses back on
@augustocanas5 күн бұрын
I miss being able to copy-paste :/
@Valdreag177 күн бұрын
I’d be fine with more companions in a Commander product.
@WhereHeInsertedTheBladee7 күн бұрын
We do NOT need more BANS in vintage
@IntrepidGamers7 күн бұрын
Wow
@ToadboyVlogs7 күн бұрын
Lol jegantha deserved the ban obviously
@robertozagarella10626 күн бұрын
What is the meaning behind the "they have the stones" sentence? I get it means "they have the best draw", but It doesn't make sense to me 😅
@TalenLee6 күн бұрын
it's a term from poker; the normal term when a player has a hand that is going to beat most everything reasonable is 'they have the nuts' the upgraded term from that is when the player has literally the best POSSIBLE hand, which is 'the stone nuts.' When poker players use it outside of poker it usually means something like 'I was going to lose because my opponent simply had everything they wanted and I could not beat their best draw.'
@thunderwolf1887 күн бұрын
Would love to see you play a UW auras in historic. Invisible stalker and spirit dancer are gas
@PhotonBread7 күн бұрын
Man... i hate ads in videos, its why i pay for KZbin Premium. And the Monopoly Ad just feels so forced right there in the middle. It turned me off from watching the video and i clicked off. Just my honest opinion and hopefully taken as feedback and nothing more
@JimDavisMTG7 күн бұрын
It will be gone in a few videos, gotta pay the bills, make sure kids have a good Xmas, etc
@asherhinrichs95666 күн бұрын
@@JimDavisMTG personally I am happy to sit thru an ad if it helps to make a merrier Christmas for your family. Just my opinion. happy Holidays Jim & thanks for all you do for the community!