November 2024 SAT Predictions | Reading and English: Expert Insights to Boost Your Score

Рет қаралды 8,886

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер

@r22gamer54 Ай бұрын

I watched her october and august video, took both of those tests. She was spot on. I recognized those questions on the test.

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

That's amazing! Happy to hear this! Hope this video helps you ace the November test! =) =)

@binishaniraula1986 Ай бұрын

rlly do they match?

@hussainbutt5344 Ай бұрын

Fr?

@aryahan4976 Ай бұрын

is this true? the questions are the same or the concept are the same?

@r22gamer54 Ай бұрын

@@aryahan4976 questions were exactly the same, but with dif vocab choices. The sentence was the same.

@kuka8315 Ай бұрын

23:38 was brilliant

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

Thank you! Know these transitions words for when you take the exam! =)

@crxzen9850 Ай бұрын

Took the November yesterday and recognized 2-3 of your questions! Helped me save a lot of time, thank you :)

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

I’m so glad! I hope you get the score you want!! =) =)

@AmrutaVelamuri Ай бұрын

hey, do you know if the notes questions were as she predicted? Do I need to read the notes too now?

@aaronmaddali2049 Ай бұрын

Just took the November SAT the Inference question with the Vitamjn D and chimpanzees was exactly on my test but different choices. Thank you so much❤

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

Oh really?! That's amazing! Glad you found it helpful! 😊😊

@oyeitsmilangaming7386 Ай бұрын

Due to your support . I hit 790 on math .Thank you so much babe ❤

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

Wow! I am so happy for you! Congratulations! Such an AMAZING score!!

@bereketgidey7167 Ай бұрын

it was such an intriguing video; thank you for the time you made to prepare this video.

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

You're welcome! Hope it helps you on the test! =) =)

@oyeitsmilangaming7386 Ай бұрын

Plz bring more videos on reading and writing . Math is ez

@Batman-f3z5o Ай бұрын

Thanks, and keep uploading reading and writing prep😊❤

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

You’re welcome! Glad you found it helpful! I’ll keep them coming! 😄 =)

@Abdul-RahimAbubakari Ай бұрын

Thanks for your video; I saw 3-4 of these questions on my Nov,2 SAT including the ambigious p6 rating question 😅 anyway i hope your answer will be correct:(

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

Oh, wow! I’m so happy to hear my predictions were helpful! I hope that it helps you get an amazing score! Let me know!! =)

@Abdul-RahimAbubakari 28 күн бұрын

@@janakpanthi7393 @janakpanthi7393 yess I'm pretty sure the p6's answer is wrong because I'd one of the bars of info & ideas empty; anyway I'd my dream score of a 1530(740RW!) 🥳🎊🎉 tnx gurlie your're amazing

@Abdul-RahimAbubakari 25 күн бұрын

@@janakpanthi7393 Yeah I'm pretty sure the answer to the p6's question was wrong because I'd an empty bar on the info and ideas section of my score report; anyway I'd my dream score: a 1530! (740RW) tnx @epicexamprep:)

@varnikaaaaaa 12 күн бұрын

1:10:00 we are supposed to support the author's conclusion not the claim right? so won't it be B

@ХусанРахимов-б8и Ай бұрын

22:00 Don't touch think Granted fits better than Again and again?

@fluteplayer0756 Ай бұрын

I think that the question is controversial.Both granted and again and again fit

@ХусанРахимов-б8и Ай бұрын

@@fluteplayer0756 agreed

@K0rth1K 16 күн бұрын

I have a question about the P6 cubism question. Since the question never mentioned that a higher correlation would mean more aesthetic pleasure, wouldn't the only conclusion that we can reasonably make is that they would differ?

@SubashThapa-jk8we 29 күн бұрын

59:14 Please make sure which is correct some of my friend are saying its d and i also prefer that are you sure its A???

@epicexamprep 29 күн бұрын

Yes...I would go for A P6's Actual Ratings: The question states that participant P6 gave equal ratings to both abstract and cubist paintings. Model's Predictions (Correlation Data): Abstract Paintings: High correlation (0.42) indicates the model's predictions closely matched P6's ratings. Cubist Paintings: Lower correlation (0.29) suggests the model's predictions didn't match P6's ratings as well. What we can interpret from this: The higher correlation for abstract paintings means the model predicted P6 would enjoy abstract paintings more than cubist ones. Since P6 rated both styles equally, the difference lies in the model's predictions, not in P6's actual ratings. Why Choice D is Incorrect: Choice D suggests P6's actual ratings differed, which contradicts the given information that P6 rated both styles equally. Choice D misinterprets the data by attributing the difference to P6's ratings rather than to the model's predictive accuracy. (in my opinion) ha. So, the data indicate the model predicted that P6 would derive more aesthetic pleasure from abstract paintings than from cubist paintings-making choice A the correct answer.

@SubashThapa-jk8we 29 күн бұрын

@@epicexamprepsome of sat tutor are saying its d i am really confude right now are you sure its a???

@swaroopkhatiwada4969 29 күн бұрын

@@epicexamprephow can we be sure about the fact that p6 derived more aesthetic pleasure from abstract paintings than cubist ones? Let’s suppose that p6 gave a rating of 1 and 4 to abstract and cubist paintings respectively and the model predicted the ratings to be 1 and 3. By this sense, the correlation graph would still look like this. As we can see, model’s predictions are equal to the actual ratings for the abstract paintings giving high correlation and model’s prediction for cubist is not exact for cubist paintings giving it a low correlation. That would mean p6 actually derived less aesthetic pleasure from abstract paintings than from cubist paintings, despite abstract paintings having higher correlation. This doesn’t really add up to me. I’d be more than happy if you could provide some help ❤

@SubashThapa-jk8we 29 күн бұрын

@@swaroopkhatiwada4969yeah same question i hope we will get our answer soon❤🎉🎉😢 much love😊

@user-cm9wy8zw2f Ай бұрын

6:50 what if one of the answer choices have a semicolon how do I choose between colon and semicolon?

@Мухамед-ш4г Ай бұрын

It means the both wrong 100%

@CHETNASHARMA-h9p Ай бұрын

Could you please upload more of such vidoes for the upcoming November sat.I would say that out of all the videos , I have watched only this youtube channel actually provides questions that comes on real test.Please upload more vidoes before our nov 2 sat.That would really help us.

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

Yes! I am working on some! Stay tuned! =)

@CHETNASHARMA-h9p Ай бұрын

@@epicexamprep If possible, could you please provide us with the worksheet of maths and english both.This is my second time giving the sat and I really wanna get a good score.Your videos have really helped me and I would be really glad if you could provide us with tons of worksheet soon before our test so that we can practice.Khan and college board have not been enough.

@binishaniraula1986 Ай бұрын

@@CHETNASHARMA-h9p do these predicted questions actaully come?

@AriongDeng Ай бұрын

I came across ur videos after my oct test n l nearly cried😢

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

Oh no! Positives...now you have them for future SATs! 😊😊

@SubashThapa-jk8we 29 күн бұрын

48:19 i think its a i am preety sure like many sat tutor as well as my friends are telling me a are you sure its wrong?

@epicexamprep 28 күн бұрын

The chimpanzee one? I feel good about D. What is your reasoning behind choosing A over D? Let me elaborate: Passage: Wild chimpanzees live exclusively in tropical countries like Tanzania. They lack adaptations to seasonal variations in UVB irradiance because UVB levels in the tropics are relatively constant year-round. In mid-latitude countries like France, UVB irradiance is lower and more variable due to seasonal changes.This raises concerns about how these differences affect the vitamin D synthesis in zoo chimpanzees. Study Findings by Sophie Moitié and Colleagues: Correlation with UVB Irradiance: Vitamin D levels in zoo chimpanzees correlate with UVB irradiance. No Plateau at Highest UVB Levels: Vitamin D levels do not show evidence of plateauing even when UVB irradiance reaches its highest local levels. Option A: "Adaptations to seasonal variations in UVB irradiance may be emerging in zoo chimpanzees in France and other mid-latitude countries." The passage indicates that chimpanzees lack adaptations to seasonal UVB variations. There's no mention or evidence of new adaptations emerging in the zoo chimpanzees. The fact that vitamin D levels continue to rise without plateauing suggests they haven't adapted to the lower UVB levels-they're still responding as they would in their natural habitat. Option D: "Zoo chimpanzees in France and other mid-latitude countries tend to synthesize less vitamin D than they are inherently capable of synthesizing." Since vitamin D levels don't plateau even at the highest local UVB levels, it implies that the chimpanzees have not reached their maximum potential for vitamin D synthesis. This suggests they could synthesize more vitamin D if exposed to higher UVB levels, similar to those in their natural tropical environments.Therefore, D logically completes the text by highlighting that the chimpanzees are not reaching their inherent capacity for vitamin D synthesis due to lower UVB levels in mid-latitude countries.

@mauricio3350 Ай бұрын

The correlation one seems confusing to me. The graph only gives the correlation between the guess and the actual rating. Now suppose that P6 gave a 1 rating to both, the model would predict a rating that strongly alligns with that rating for the abstract painting, and such the predicted rating would be lower. On the other hand, since the correlation is lower for cubist, the model would predict a higher score. In my mind the only answer that makes sense is letter D, because if the correlations differ, it means that the guess differ, given the rating was the same between those two.

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

Yes! It is a tough question! So first...like I mentioned in my video that correlation measures how well the model's predictions align with the actual ratings given by the participant. It ranges from -1 to +1: +1: Perfect positive correlation (predictions exactly match ratings). 0: No correlation (predictions do not match ratings at all). -1: Perfect negative correlation (predictions are the exact opposite of ratings). So in the question: Abstract Paintings: Correlation = 0.42 Cubist Paintings: Correlation = 0.29 A higher correlation for abstracts (0.42) means the model's predictions for abstract paintings were more accurate compared to cubist paintings (0.29). This doesn't directly indicate whether the model predicted higher or lower enjoyment, but rather how well the predictions matched the actual ratings. ok so if P6 rated both Abstract and Cubist paintings as 1: Model's Predictions: Abstract: 1.5 Cubist: 3 Interpretation: Abstract Prediction (1.5 vs. Actual 1): Closer alignment → Higher correlation (0.42) Cubist Prediction (3 vs. Actual 1): Farther alignment → Lower correlation (0.29) Conclusion: The model was more accurate in predicting the abstract painting rating. Ok....so let's see if P6 rated both Abstract and Cubist paintings as 3 Model's Predictions: Abstract: 2.7 Cubist: 1.7 Interpretation: Abstract Prediction (2.7 vs. Actual 3): Closer alignment → Higher correlation (0.42) Cubist Prediction (1.7 vs. Actual 3): Farther alignment → Lower correlation (0.29) Conclusion: Again, the model was more accurate in predicting the abstract painting rating. So...I am going to double down on A hah Higher Correlation for Abstracts (0.42) indicates that the model's predictions for abstracts were closer to P6's actual ratings, meaning the model better predicted enjoyment for abstracts. The model likely anticipated higher enjoyment for abstracts, and this anticipation matched P6's actual ratings more closely.... Option D: "P6’s ratings for abstract and cubist paintings would differ from one another." First, there is an assumption issue that I addressed in video...because the passage explicitly states "Assuming participant P6 gave equal ratings to the abstract and cubist paintings." Also, correlation doesn't indicate equality: Correlation measures how well predictions match ratings, not whether ratings are the same or different. Even if P6 gave equal ratings, the differing correlations show how accurately the model predicted each style's rating, not that the ratings themselves differ. D assumes differing ratings, which contradicts the given scenario of equal ratings. So mainly, Higher Correlation ≠ Higher Rating: It means the model's prediction was more accurate for that style, not that one style was rated higher. I hope this makes more sense of it!! Let me know! Thank you =)

@feislurz1667 Ай бұрын

@@epicexamprep yeah but answer choice A states that the model predicts p6 derives MORE aesthetic pleasure from abstract art which would indicate the model predicting P6 a higher score. This would, like you said, imply that higher rating = higher correlation. To me, it seems Answer A does not mean it was more accurate, but that it thought P6 would enjoy the painting more??? Im so confused

@janakpanthi7393 28 күн бұрын

@@epicexamprep there is no assumption issue in the last sentence of the qn it says ...model predicted that ______ so we are talking about model's prediction of P6's score and we are not contradicting with the assumption on the question which states that actual P6's rating were same. Consider this: P6 actual rating Abstract 2, Cubist 2 (since P6 rating is same for both). Let's assume the model predicted that P6 will rate 1.5 for Abstract and 3.5 for cubist (again we don't have any idea about what the model predicts, it's totally up to how it was trained so don't make any assumption here). Here you can clearly see that the correlation in P6 actual rating and the prediction by the model for P6's rating on abstract paintings align closer i.e. higher correlation. And since the rating differs for cubist there is lower correlation. BUT THIS SITUATION WHERE U HAVE HIGHER CORRELATION FOR ABSTRACT PANTINGS BUT PREDICTION OF HIGHER RATINGS FOR CUBIST FROM P6 BY THE MODEL DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS WITH OPTION "A". (So, the only thing we can logiclly conclude is that THE MODEL'S PREDICTION OF P6'S RATINGS FOR ABSTRACT AND CUBIST PAINTING WERE DIFFERENT).

@saurabbanstola7839 Ай бұрын

Please upload another video on Nov test prediction... I am giving test in nov...please help

@PrincessDeborah-l3v Ай бұрын

Thank you so much.still awaiting more predictions especially the maths

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

I'm working on it! 😉

@Azmo.s Ай бұрын

1:21:41 i think its B because the conculusion says ability to distinguish the laughters but the 2nd opt sayd the have no effect on identification (means they cann't seperate r?) and i think opt A is out of context or please help me understand it more please reply mam

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

Always, for weaken questions, the conclusion is king, and the conclusion of the study is that the ability to distinguish between spontaneous and volitional laughter is universal across cultures. This means the researchers believe that regardless of the culture or society, people can tell the difference between real and fake laughter. Option B mentions "community size" as a factor. It says that the size of communities has "no effect on listeners’ identifications of laughter." This means that whether a society is big or small doesn't impact people's ability to identify laughter as spontaneous or volitional. But this doesn’t really challenge the main idea that distinguishing laughter is universal across cultures-it just says community size doesn't change that ability. So, Option B isn’t a strong answer because it doesn't weaken the conclusion that this ability is universal-it just mentions a specific factor (community size) that doesn't make a difference. Option A says that volitional (fake) laughter in a natural social context can share acoustic qualities with spontaneous (real) laughter. In other words, fake laughter and real laughter can sound similar in certain situations. This would weaken the conclusion because if both types of laughter can sound similar, it would be harder for people to tell the difference, challenging the idea that people can universally distinguish between the two types of laughter. Hope this helps! Thank you for your comment =)

@j3ffgarlic136 Ай бұрын

Thank you for this video

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

Good Luck tomorrow!! I hope it goes well!! =) =)

@j3ffgarlic136 Ай бұрын

⁠yo i encountered exactly 2 questions from reading lol. One is the abt the DNA and the other is the P6 one.😂😂 Thank u so muchhh!!

@dima542-i4s Ай бұрын

@@j3ffgarlic136 exactly the same question??

@dima542-i4s Ай бұрын

from this video

@j3ffgarlic136 Ай бұрын

@@dima542-i4s yep

@NickAce-g6u Ай бұрын

we had a debate in 1:01:01 question i told a many told d so a bit confused

@bayoracle7176 Ай бұрын

I hope these come out🎉 Thank you so much 😅

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

You're welcome! I hope they help for your next upcoming exam! =)

@shihyeonbang6249 Ай бұрын

can upload more videos for english??

@ashrafhameed6493 Ай бұрын

Thanks alot for ur help appreciate it

@Iamtrishna8 Ай бұрын

Her voice is so sweet

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

Thanks! Sometimes it is hard to listen to for me. 🙈 But I can't change my tone, so I just roll with it!

@MiaDo-k9c Ай бұрын

thank you so much !

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

You're welcome! Hope you find them helpful!

@chaubaonguyen2183 Ай бұрын

The chimpanzees question was a really controversial one in August. My teacher said B was correct but a lot of people thought A and D were also correct. :)

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

I think definitely D, but it is 100% a tough one! Just to summarize the main points: ->Wild chimpanzees live in tropical countries like Tanzania and lack adaptations to seasonal variations in UVB irradiance. ->UVB exposure enables vertebrates to synthesize vitamin D. ->Zoo chimpanzees in mid-latitude countries like France are exposed to lower and more variable UVB irradiance. -Study Findings by Sophie Moittié and colleagues: ->Vitamin D levels correlate with UVB irradiance in zoo chimpanzees. ->Vitamin D levels show no evidence of plateauing as UVB irradiance reaches its highest local levels. So basically the correlation indicates that as UVB irradiance increases, vitamin D levels in zoo chimpanzees increase. The lack of plateauing suggests that even at the highest local UVB levels, the chimpanzees' vitamin D levels are still increasing and haven't reached a maximum. And that's why I feel D is correct because the correlation between UVB irradiance and vitamin D levels, coupled with the lack of plateauing, suggests that zoo chimpanzees are not synthesizing as much vitamin D as they are capable of. This is due to the lower and more variable UVB irradiance in mid-latitude countries compared to their natural tropical habitats. =) =) =)

@user-cm9wy8zw2f Ай бұрын

one of the questions was on my august exam lol

@SadafChowdhury-gl8dp Ай бұрын

I had a question for the correlation graph. So, the participant gave an equal rating to the paintings. But the rating is never mentioned in the text. So, let's say he gave a rating of 1 to both the images. But the computer model predicted the person's rating to be around 1.5 for abstract and 3 for cubist. Hence, it shows that there is a higher correlation for abstract than for cubist. So, the model predicted person to enjoy the cubist more than the abstract. The exact opposite can happen if the person rated both the paintings a rating of 3. The model might predict the rating to be 2.7 for the abstract and 1.7 for the cubist. So, the correlation of abstract is again higher than that of cubist. So, the model assumes that the person will enjoy the abstract more than the cubist. Doesn't this show that options A and C can be both correct at the same time? Let's say we eliminate them. Then we are left with option D as option B is already incorrect as it is the opposite of what the graph is saying. So, isn't option D the correct answer as the model predicted the person to have different ratings due to the different correlation?

@epicexamprep Ай бұрын

Hi! Great question-let me clarify. In the passage, we don't have P6's actual ratings for abstract and cubist paintings-they're not provided. What we do have are the correlation values between the model's predictions and P6's actual ratings: higher correlation for abstracts (0.42) and lower for cubists (0.29). A higher correlation means the model's predictions matched P6's actual ratings better for that style. This suggests that the model predicted P6 would enjoy abstract paintings more, and this prediction was more accurate. Even in your hypothetical scenarios where P6 rated both styles equally, the higher correlation for abstracts indicates the model's predictions were closer to P6's actual ratings for abstracts than for cubists. We can't assume or confirm that P6 gave equal ratings-we simply don't have that data. Option A states: "The model predicted that P6 would derive more aesthetic pleasure from abstract paintings than from cubist paintings." This aligns with the higher correlation for abstracts, showing the model's predictions were more accurate for that style. Option D ("P6 gave equal ratings to abstract and cubist paintings") isn't supported because we don't know P6's actual ratings-we can't infer this from the correlation data alone. So, based on the information provided, Option A is the correct answer because it reflects what the model predicted and how well those predictions aligned with P6's actual ratings. Hope this helps clarify a bit more? Let me know =) =)

@SadafChowdhury-gl8dp Ай бұрын

@@epicexamprep thank you very much!

@chasematthews5037 Ай бұрын

Yes but what if the model predicted different values for abstract and cubist, the correlation would then be how close the model predicted to p6 response. So if P6 rated both 2 but the model predicted he would chose 3 for abstract and 4 for cubist, it would show the model was closer to predicting the value of abstract because of the .42 correlation but does not necessarily say he would like it more. Cause if it predicted 4 for cubist and he put 2 the correlation would then be less for cubist which is .29. So I feel like D, which is different could absolutely be right, since it proves the stament that since p6 put equal values, and the correlation are different then the model predicted he would have different response. I understand your interpretation is right, I’m just trying to explain how I’m conceptually understanding it, and I’m struggling to understand right answer.

@chasematthews5037 Ай бұрын

@@epicexamprepfor option D you could support that right? Because in last sentence it saids “assuming P6 have equal answers” which is means that since the graph as different correlation, it would then be saying graph predicted p6 answers to differ right?

@chasematthews5037 Ай бұрын

@@epicexamprepalso thank you for all the help, last video helped so much got a 760 on reading in October SAT