So much smoother than the old Cessna 172s and Pipers I trained with. Great video guys!
@wheelsandwings75353 жыл бұрын
That is impressive the DA 40 NG is very pleasing to the eye and state of art technology wow I want one, well done Diamond 💎👍
@attorneyaviator13183 жыл бұрын
My favorite airplane. Got my PPL in a DA-20. Then got signed off in the NG. Wow. So easy to fly.
@LifeStyleAviation3 жыл бұрын
We're happy to hear this! It's a pretty amazing airplane!
@whatisgeneralaviation88743 жыл бұрын
Really good airplane, well equipped , nice to fly ! Love it ❤️
@enyapersson2855 Жыл бұрын
This is so cool, looking forward to starting on my license with this plane!
@Big.Ron13 жыл бұрын
I learned to fly in the DV and DA 20 back in the 90s. One of the things they would do is spins. Will this aircraft, the DA40 NG spin? Is it certified in both Standard and Utility catagories like the Rotax DV & DA-20 are? It was the best thing for getting over the problem of carrying an extra few knots on landing. To know what the airplane is telling you made life so much easier. And spins are great fun. Several times on way back to the barn my instructor and I would compete for who had to buy a beer after we were done. 4 and half turn spins. We had a road out in the desert that was our guide. In the end it was about even. But, it sure helped my flying as I learned how to feel the airplane talking which made me a better and safer pilot. No more floating down the runway! I loved them then and I am sure I will love the new ones. Although, I have never flown a glass cockpit. I cant wait. Thank you!
@LifeStyleAviation3 жыл бұрын
Hey Ron! The DA40 is not approved for spins. Glad to hear you got to enjoy the DA20 though -- it's a fun, sporty airplane!
@rodolforodriguez453510 ай бұрын
Flying modern planes with harry porter, cant get better than that.
@rayterry7 Жыл бұрын
I was the one-thousandth like! Great video guys!
@owenrosindell89562 жыл бұрын
Very nice video and I will use some of the patter for type conversions. I didn't see the TO flap retracted or fuel pump switched off after takeoff at 700 ft AGL but noticed they were off later in the video. I am FI in the UK exclusively flying DA40 and DA42 Diamond > 1000 hours Instructing. There are significant advantages with FADEC not found in another aircraft type with name sounding like a cloud I would comment . . . Waiting to the DA50 to be available here in the UK
@Booboobear-eo4es2 жыл бұрын
I always thought of the planning, navigating, running up to check the engine, manually piloting as part of the enjoyment of flying. If the airplane does everything, where's the fun? One might as well stay home and let the airplane take the flight by itself.
@semiprofessional8470 Жыл бұрын
I agree. That connection to the machine is special. The connection to multiple computers isn't for everyone.
@bobmccoy46522 жыл бұрын
How many authorized service centers are nearby to help when engine fails run up?
@CraigLewis3 жыл бұрын
Your audio was very clear. What method did you use to connect and record the audio? Thanks.
@LifeStyleAviation Жыл бұрын
Hi Craig, we use a Zoom Recorder plugged in to one of the passenger headset ports via 1/4 in cable.
@donlyons5279 Жыл бұрын
Would love to own one
@barrycliborn51692 жыл бұрын
Any chance Diamond is going to upgrade this plane to a Austro 330 for 180 hp?
@erikdijkhuizen8 ай бұрын
How did you record the radio and microphone audio?
@Paco_Gaepedores Жыл бұрын
What a beauty ❤
@rmj2n3 жыл бұрын
Nice landing!
@barrycliborn51692 жыл бұрын
So I fly this plane in MSFS 2020. From kPWG to KCWC, 184nm converted to regular miles 211.7. I use 10.8 gallons of JetA. For 19.5 mpg. At 10,000 feet. Is this about right for the real DA40? If correct this would be a great selling point. Better mileage than my 2014 Tacoma.
@semiprofessional8470 Жыл бұрын
Maybe even better in real life with fuel management.
@kmurphytcs8 ай бұрын
Nice plane
@tymark16 ай бұрын
Would love to own one. Sadly GA is just ridiculously expensive. Not sure I’ll ever be able to afford a $500-600,000 airplane. Shit, my current 70 year old aircraft cost me $60k lol. Just insane.
@Kefoo_ Жыл бұрын
-- I can't fly. I want one anyway. Does anyone know a woman pilot who wants me and has a Diamond DA 40 NG?
@carlhopkinson2 жыл бұрын
My experience flying this in MSFS, it is very spin-resistant.
@Quin360 Жыл бұрын
Same
@fdtank813 жыл бұрын
We’ll done!
@carlhopkinson2 жыл бұрын
I WANT ONE!!!
@randho51502 жыл бұрын
Looks tight - what's the cabin width?
@OmarKnowCars Жыл бұрын
I don’t know the numbers buts is wider and room-er than a C172 or a piper Archer. If this reference helps.
@thezeek27453 жыл бұрын
What a company. Make the only twin that won’t kill you of an engine goes out and you’re not an ace pilot
@nickthechicken11 Жыл бұрын
so fun to fly on microsoft flight sim
@haroldhalmason3815 Жыл бұрын
That joystick does not look well positioned for a long flight
@MAGApepe3 жыл бұрын
nice :))
@jeremy89295 ай бұрын
I would love to own one
@michaelzwiener3952 жыл бұрын
Need. want.
@dtsh44512 жыл бұрын
How many coffee cup holders in the cabin🤣?
@rogerj.77233 жыл бұрын
Does it have an airframe parachute? Thanks
@owenrosindell89562 жыл бұрын
No and you probably don't need one in a DA40. With engine out the decent rate (and speed at which you'd hit the ground) when trimmed is very low. Compare this with the decent rate of another GA aircraft when using an airframe parachute. The speed could be up to 1700 ft per minute or 3X that of the DA40NG . . . The only place this parachute system will benefit is in mountainous and rocky domains or over extensive forests and even then there are significant risks to deployment
@manuelaranas397311 ай бұрын
One just crashed.
@giannisflorakis36808 ай бұрын
!!!!!!!!!!!!
@phatkid68112 жыл бұрын
Dislike the instructural technique. 1 person on the controls - either the student or take the aircraft. Having 2 people on the controls is bad all around.
@WattsUpDev2 жыл бұрын
That’s why you aren’t an instructor
@OmarKnowCars Жыл бұрын
@@WattsUpDev are you?
@meazy4518 ай бұрын
You should cry more
@heartscards63352 жыл бұрын
music sucks
@cmdmd2 жыл бұрын
As “reliable” as prop aircraft engines can be, they are a joke compared to car engines. Their reliability is crap. Aviation Engine failure stats are astounding, I know you’d ever imagine your old Chevy/Toyota/Audi/Ford engine to simply break and seize up or malfunction. Funny, isn’t it?
@buckshot7042 жыл бұрын
Completely different conversation. Apples and oranges. Aviation power plants operate in three dimensions not two as would any machine designed for land travel. Any man-made machine has the capacity to fail. Proper maintenance is key, along with competent instruction for the range of use.
@cmdmd2 жыл бұрын
@@buckshot704 The numbers don’t lie. Regardless of maintenance, piston aircraft engines have a considerably higher failure rate when compared to car engines. It is an issue of reliability, the constipated certification process has strangled innovation. Just facts.
@buckshot7042 жыл бұрын
@@cmdmd ; I’d be curious to see evidence of those “facts”. I call statistical BS. If true, then aviation, as a global industry, either has tremendously competent pilots who consistently put-up with manufacturing negligence, or lazy attorneys refusing to file lawsuits against engine manufacturers. The video is about a particular model of Diamond aircraft. Their diesel is an outstanding mechanical marvel. I fail to see how negative perspectives about aircraft engines versus car engines makes sense. Two totally different applications.
@jasonsong86 Жыл бұрын
It's all relative. Most airplane engines are running continuously at 70-90% of power where car engines rarely continuously run at that level.