OJ Simpson Trial - March 7th, 1995 - Part 1

[@SebMenard]

This guy is clearly not cooperative... doesn’t seem honest at all.

[@AliceNsWonderland]

Rosa Maria Lopez

[@surpriseimblack]

Not cooperative with the defence** 🤬

[@surpriseimblack]

@Lori Massacci They're all racists.. especially Furhman. Don't you remember the Rodney King riots??

[@diogopinto9462]

Marcia can u please stop coughing on mic ?

[@nurnadialacson1134]

Lange what kind of detective are you???? Cannot say,cannot pin down,I don't know so on and on!!! The bottom line is if you telling the truth and nothing but the truth you will remember every single thing Lange!!! Unless you have amnesia!!!!

[@AliceNsWonderland]

3 words: Rosa Maria Lopez

[@michaelshaffer1658]

Seasoned officers/detectives are expert at the art of selective amnesia. Couple that with judges who allow such witnesses to answer questions, on defense direct, to their own satisfaction, is a very big part of the corrupt legal machine to not only remain running, but to grow ever larger.

[@surpriseimblack]

@@michaelshaffer1658 they are sooo uncooperative with the defence..

[@kennethwalls341]

Shut up lmfao what she lied about, nothing important to do with the murders 🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️​@@AliceNsWonderland

[@joeragman6568]

If the trivial objections were removed this trial would have lasted a month.

[@steveviveney4796]

Johnny made a fool out of this snide cop!!

[@tolstoyed]

he made a mockery of the court and judicial system at best

[@90times4]

@@tolstoyed however, Mr. Simpson was found not guilty.

[@romahnae]

37:05 what an objection. probably the most important 'sustained' that cost the prosecution the case. judge ito most likely looked back at that one and said "oh dear". either way, the ruling was correct. it was indeed a 'assuming facts that aren't in evidence' call. the detectives and the prosecution knew what type shoe left the print but failed to hunt them down at all cost or any other evidence that proves a connection between the suspect and the shoes.

[@kennethwalls341]

Lmfao they mostly sustained the defense 🤦🏽‍♂️

[@micheller7509]

they literally had a guy from bloomingdales testify that he was showing OJ the size 12 bruno magli shoes but unfortunatly back then they didnt have a computerized sales system to recall the receipt. it was only a year later that the civil trial found a photo of OJ wearing those shoes. how can they hunt down shoes when OJ dumped them along with the murder weapon and probably some clothes

[@paulpatane2439]

​@micheller7509 always wondered where the shoes,knife and clothes he had on went.

[@Darknezz2]

Man Marcia was NOT strong enough for this case. She the kinda person fall for anything

[@Brrrettt]

If any tiny protocol wasn’t followed, the Defense would destroy you on the stand. This forces the prosecutors’ witnesses to lie about the little things that normally don’t matter (like putting the shoes in the trunk lie) tiny lies = scared detective. Black jury doesn’t like lying policemen.

[@Wallace-oh6qy]

Dat jury hated all white cops

[@rebelwithacause3574]

Black's dont like anything and impossible to satisfy.

[@lostdogs10]

The redirect by Marcia Clark os hard to watch and listen too, it's like she lost the ability to ask proper questions

[@sherilynnpontillo7936]

Good thing there was no Covid back then... Marcia would have been a super spreader!

[@manthony777]

True lol

[@lynndragoman2454]

If Marcia was a super spreader she most likely wouldnt be going through her second divorce

[@manthony777]

@@lynndragoman2454 , you are trans?

[@beneaththecrust4661]

@@lynndragoman2454, heeeeeeeeeeeeee he he

[@dulaelba9589]

How would he know the garage was closed and secured during the times of the murder? Corrupt COPS 👮

[@pommiebears]

If they planted the Bruno Magli shoes....why take the Reebok’s for comparison? Surely, they’d already know the Reebok’s weren’t the ones that left the prints. Only one who planted those Bruno Magli shoes is OJ.

[@lynndragoman1573]

No bruno magli shoe was ever produced during this trial please watch more and post less

[@veteranhelpingveterans2113]

It was taken for ojs foot size in shoes only

[@Wallace-oh6qy]

​@@lynndragoman1573 in civil trail they did it. Oj lied

[@lindastretch2522]

my top cop

[@nurnadialacson1134]

The Goldman Family or the father don't give a damn of getting real justice for his son! He only after of OJ millions!

[@db7377]

nur nadia lacson you're joking right?? You don't actually believe that do you???...

[@LynnAnn588]

nur nadia I can't believe you can be that dumb and cruel. Try having a loved one slaughtered by this man while he sits in court like a Cheshire cat with a black jury and his "dream team scum " lawyers after your loved one was slaughtered by him and lays cold and dead than come back and say you only care about OJ's money when you want justice done for your loved ones. The Goldmans only other option to punish OJ for what he did was to hit his wallet. You never said why don't OJ just pay the 3 million instead of hiding out in Florida after he killed their son and brother. Mr. Goldman already said if OJ went to prison he wouldn't want the money, he'd rather have OJ in prison

[@edgarestradajr8192]

Seriously???

[@nurnadialacson1134]

@@LynnAnn588 you can call me stupidest and heartless person in the whole white world but I cannot believed 1000percent that the defendant did it simply because some people who investigate that case are not telling the truth and nothing but the truth!

[@nurnadialacson1134]

@@db7377 How I wish that I am not!

[@busterbrown8523]

Now where would Furhman meet Nicole. Are they suggesting that they were intimately involved.

[@romahnae]

what? no. furhman had met nicole briefly in response to a 911 call after a furious o.j smashed her car's windshield with a baseball bat. she was sobering uncontrollably, furhman came unto the scene and got everybody to settle down then he asked her if she wanted to make a report and she said no.

[@lynndragoman1573]

@@romahnae i think OJ smashed his own car?

[@lindastretch2522]

that my top

[@lynndragoman1573]

The corruption at LAPD was top to bottom. The Co-lead detective took Mr Simpson's shoes home for the night and snagged 11 cents from the crime scene.

[@bennywhite7062]

Wow, how deaf, blind and dumb you must be. The cops planted OJ's blood too right........Moron.

[@lynndragoman1573]

@@bennywhite7062 watch deputy district attorney christopher darden during his first meltdown and quit being a useful idiot your embarrassing your mother

[@24running]

Great video for questioning on a cross.

[@lindastretch2522]

how he got away with it

[@lostdogs10]

Very suspicious that Detective Lang took the Reebok shoes home and the explanation of why he did it makes no logical sense

[@TheMrbc74]

If there was something shady going on why would lang not just take those reeboks to bundy, dip them in blood leave some shoe prints and frame oj. Slam dunk case then right. The reeboks was a red herring by the defence, accuse police of handling evidence poorly then say well your honor all the evidence must be suspect. They knew the evidence was damming so they had to fool the jury into thinking it was all planted or where it wasn’t disputed say the evidence was tampered with, and this jury who didn’t understand what dna was fell for it

[@Jeromemayle]

24:36 28:14 "Just took the shoes instead of giving them to Fung"

[@lashondamadise1880]

I love Mr. Douglas’s voice

[@Jeromemayle]

LOL... I thought I was the only one.

[@Anita-ee4bs]

I love hearing him say alcohol

[@paulawerchowsky926]

To be fair, there should be equal number of lawyers on both sides

[@kennethwalls341]

That's not how it works lol