OJ25 Episode 14 - The TRUE Story of the OJ Simpson Trial (Court TV Docuseries)

[@moonstar9101]

Watching this in 2024. Cannot believe it’s been 30 years.

[@josephconnor2310]

Can't believe it's been 30 years since the murders either.

[@AnitaMariaWhite]

@moonstar9101 - Watching right now 4/21/2024...better than anything on local television...viva la youtube . . . the best platform/service on the Internet!!!!!

[@dollienotparton2921]

I thought I saw every minute of this case .. but this excellent series revealed new issues I do not recall.. regardless of the human & judicial mistakes, the DNA, hair, bloody footprint evidence existed & it’s so clear Simpson was guilty…don’t know how these defense lawyers sleep at night..

[@bgiovannic]

@@josephconnor2310Yes! 30 years since the murders. Let’s be clear though…, O.J. Did not do it!!!

[@daviddavis3389]

​He was clearly not guilty! The Jury members did not trust the inconclusive DNA! The Jury members were not highly educated however they were intelligent common everyday people and most( if not all) had never received any formal DNA training and did trust the police at all; do not forget that DNA was relatively new in 1994! ....OJ had been dating super modeLs and apparently did not want Nicole no longer! repudiately, she : Goldman had been involved in shady association and why was Ron dropping off eyeglasses at 2AM?...I wish that the Jury had been better trained in forensics! I would've voted innocent as well!😢😢@@dollienotparton2921

[@kgmv4798]

Thank you Kay for taking the time to upload this for all of us.

[@thetrialofthecentury]

No problem!

[@elchessboy0wnzuagain]

@@thetrialofthecentury this should be called OJ25-The HATING story of OJ SIMPSON the innocent man

[@SethMacLeod95]

@@thetrialofthecentury you’re the best!!

[@elizabethalexis7812]

Yes thank you Kay. This series is a lovely recap of the trial with appropriate commentary.

[@qualateel1076]

@@thetrialofthecentury q1

[@annefernstrom9418]

Kay, thank you so much for posting these. They're very addicting, I couldn't stop watching them. You did an excellent job !!

[@kanyebreast6072]

Addictive** not addicting

[@daviddavis3389]

​@@kanyebreast6072es lomismo tambien.😢

[@Anita-ee4bs]

Johnny Cochran was much more aggressive than soft spoken Chris Darden. He was no match for him

[@PoirotFanGirl]

So very sad for the Brown and Goldman families that they were never afforded justice for the murder of their loved ones 🙁

[@williebeamen2x]

What would constitute for justice in your opinion sir?

[@tobak952]

@@williebeamen2x i cant speak for San, but the police actually doing their job and finding the right killer, wouldve helped in my opinion

[@jadedheartsz]

especially since OJ didn't do it.

[@tobak952]

@@jadedheartsz exactly

[@j.m.5744]

@@jadedheartsz Oh, OJ definitely did it my man. His lawyers just kicked the prosecutions ass because they got complacent. They all were use to prosecuting people who had no money, or legal teams representing them, and then they end up in court facing 7 legal scholars and a famous defendant. Nicole and Ron's blood was at OJ house lmao.....he did it.

[@111111111Tiger]

Sociopaths do not think they are mentally ill. It is all they know. It is their normal.

[@julief634]

We need to bring back the institutions for the mentally ill and put them in straight jackets just like the good ol' days. Keep them out of society.

[@LibertyStation92106]

And oJ is a malignant narcissist. We had the same in the 2016 election.. it's not political, it' a mental health fact.

[@HectorJW2007]

Actually, Elliot was the one leaving the Reese's Pieces. E.T. ate them.

[@angeliquerodriguez1215]

Damn! It sure was!😂😂😂

[@williamrichardson24]

🤣🤣🤣

[@EdibleOctopus]

Your objection is sustained

[@MadWeiner]

Ouuch.

[@gmailuser3377]

You should’ve been on the prosecution team.

[@roxannemoser]

LAPD was called 8 times and they did nothing? Nicole and Ron's blood is on their hands.

[@marleneg7794]

And his exoneration is on the DAs office.

[@LoveTeeC3]

OJ's acquittal is as well. They directly contributed to screwing up the evidence and allowing reasonable doubt to enter. I have no doubt he did it--but the DA's office and the LAPD did NOT prove it. So sad.

[@jadedheartsz]

@@marleneg7794 nah he innocent.

[@TheInterestedObserver]

he was charged and punished in 1989, at the time of the murder they were divorced what three years? Nicole even said he had not been physical with her since the divorce.

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

no it is not

[@Syphaxx5]

Cochran was in complete control. He used everything surrounding this case to his advantage. He had mind-control over the jury and judge Ito! I almost felt the judge would step in & tell him calm down as passionate as he was speaking to him

[@marleneg7794]

Its easy to control the weak with flattery

[@Syphaxx5]

@@marleneg7794 thank you for the comment. Have a blessed day

[@Syphaxx5]

Innocent

[@jadedheartsz]

no the prosecution just screwed up that's all

[@philipwilliams1754]

@@marleneg7794 Cochron was Itos' boss at the LA Prosecutors office.

[@kennethcharles1386]

The one thing that puzzled me about this case is that Ms Clark continues to question the experts who are being cross examination by the defense experts, made absolutely no sense in her trying to confuse the Jurors as to what she is talking about instead of her letting the experts speak she took total control over the state's experts. I guess Ms Clark thought she knew more then the experts even they at times seemed to be confused. The prosecution team could never explain that preservative found in OJs blood found at the crime scene. In the end the prosecution was able to prove that OJ was a batterer of Nicole Brown Simpson. Instead they put on battering case. The cops couldn't be trusted and that tape recordings of Mark Fuhrman talking about he'd frame Black African Americans. Ms Clark trying to explain DNA was a big mistake. With all that evidence the amount of blood recovered at OJs resident was minute by all means he had to have been covered in blood they keep referring to a DNA match but then its broken down to it's his blood type and then to have Ms Clark explain DNA was just as bad as the trying on of those gloves not once but twice. This trial was definitely made for TV because it wasn't about justice for Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. Everyone involved became a celebrity except for Allen Park the limousine driver and because of Ms Clark's over questioning him over and over again about did he see a bronco parked outside, he finally says and I quote (I wasn't looking for a bronco) under cross examination he admitted it could have been there, but he wasn't looking for a bronco, he was looking for an address. They blew this case big time. A dog barking in that community and only one witness heard a dog barking at that time of night. Why didn't the neighbors within a few feet hear anything....... there's just to many unanswered questions. You can't be home alone and establish your alibi in this case even if you have people living on your property and your in one place and their in another part of your property? A hundred years from now they'll still be asking questions about this case.

[@rastula8708]

Well put

[@bethsmith-zv3iq]

I bet our grandkids will be talking this case

[@kennethcharles1386]

@@bethsmith-zv3iq definitely this will be a lesson in every law school in America and else were in the world.

[@bethsmith-zv3iq]

If I was on that jury and had to listen to Marcia Clark explain DNA I would have been catching ZZZ s 😭😭😭😭

[@kennethcharles1386]

@@bethsmith-zv3iq but that's exactly what happened, instead of letting the DNA experts handle their job, she tried to explain it and then when she realized she didn't know what the hell she was talking about; she tells the jurors you just have to use your common sense. But my favorite was her trying to explain the EDTA situation and how it got in OJs blood samples from a crime scene? Ms Clark's answer was its in the foods we eat. "I could see the look on those jurors faces. WTF.... this was just a bad prosecution team all together then to make it even worse the police and the detectives kept lying or acting arrogant as hell, and dumb as #u@k. It was Gill Garceitti who was playing games by appointing Ms Clark to handle this case with dummy Darden, they couldn't prosecute a traffic ticket........

[@queensabs6333]

Oh Kay you have made my day… actually days. Thanks so much sis 🥰💋👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

[@tobak952]

i love how Lange called OJ a sociopath for wanting him to do his job propperly... realy tells you something about the cops attitude 14:50

[@lisabradford8180]

he needs to look at his own colleagues to see a sociopath.

[@LoveTeeC3]

Yeah, f**k that guy. He takes no responsibility for what his colleagues and him messed up. OJ walked because they messed up, and because the DA's office botched trial.

[@jadedheartsz]

yeah Furhman is the real sociopath here.

[@tobak952]

@@jadedheartsz exactly

[@tobak952]

@@lisabradford8180 this

[@petaljames6402]

OJ's passing directed me to these series!!

[@sharonharrison3611]

The judge was obviously for OH Simpson

[@jadedheartsz]

no troll

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

no, drunkard

[@sww3405]

This is so heartbreaking 💔 Rest In Peace,beautiful Nicole. Rest In Peace, Ronald. Can’t understand how this monster gets to be free.

[@tobak952]

they never caught the monster... heartbreaking indeed

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

would it be less tragic if they were ugly?

[@lisa._.the._.lovely]

You and me both, my friend. It doesn't matter how long it's been since their deaths, Nicole and Ron will be stained into the American memory. *Their lives were **_not_** taken in vein for, among many reasons, they haven't been forgotten.*

[@sww3405]

@@lisa._.the._.lovely ❤️ it’s true.

[@drointhewind480]

Thank the dumbass cops, a mockery of justice

[@patchandkayla]

The jury could have stopped listening when they ask the same question over and over .

[@chrissyart7984]

A man that Bashes a Woman& Inflicts fear into her,Is Not A Real Man@ all, Is Not Even an Innocent Man..He Will meet his Challenge Some Day!!!

[@imadbasayev8541]

What if dinner is late or shirts are not ironed, would he get a pass?

[@Screencappedhats]

There you go again with your atrocious spelling and grammar and of course your batshit crazy "logic".

[@johndoe3788]

Depends on what the woman did to the man.

[@kanyebreast6072]

OJ is not a man. He's a piece of shit to beat the hell out of his children's mother, while his children are present. Hes nothing but a dirty piece of shit, regardless of the murder.

[@samantarizzi248]

@@kanyebreast6072 exactly! As a woman I can’t thank you enough for thinking this way! Real men don’t beat their wives!

[@InstructorMike]

Kay is AMAZING!!!!!!

[@daviddavis3389]

I actually love Kay's jewelry..

[@mallismills4342]

Some of the prosecutors witness didn't do their homework well... They didn't take the case serious and the dream team had easy time to nullify the witness and some of the evidence presented to the court...

[@SuiGenerisAbbie]

Kay, you are LEGEND! ❤

[@donjonesmusic860]

This is so wonderful

[@ezekielmajor5511]

The one thing I struggle with in this case is the lack of bruises on OJ if he was in such a fierce fight with Ron. He should have had noticeable bruises of this struggle, but there were none.

[@lisabell2573]

No one ever claimed they fought, in fact in trial they said the opposite . ..

[@AK-my6dv]

@@lisabell2573the prosecution literally claimed they fought. They said the scuffle with goldman lasted 2-3 minutes and he had defense wounds from instances where he tried to counter the attacks on him. Are you implying that Ron just stood there for 2-3 minutes and let OJ do whatever he pleases

[@pommiebears]

Hard to punch someone who is behind you with a knife in your throat. I think Ron hurt his hands trying desperately to get away, trying to punch, hitting the tree, and fence.

[@iPro3million]

@@AK-my6dvdefence wounds are not an attempt to counter attack, they are wounds made when one is trying to defend themselves

[@hernandayolearyallda]

@@pommiebearsCut the crap, how does a knife wielding old ass arthritic man just "get behind" the younger man with a knife and manage to obtain and maintain control from the rear. It is a foolish comment. Ron was faster, OJ can't take his back easily. There is literally one small stub of a tree, it doesn't explain even 40% of those bruises.

[@pietertantih8641]

Only if dogs could tell

[@gingerriviera3654]

Wow...Johnnie literally said everything everyone wantes to hear. Playing to Ito's ego, saying what all the jurors were thinking about going home etc.. Ito can't even and doesn't raise his eyes to speak to the Prosecution when he sustains the objection by the defense. Pathetic.

[@TheInterestedObserver]

It's almost like he is a professional defense lawyer being paid to win a case 🙄

[@hus390]

Johnnie quoted the judge’s order which the prosecutors violated! Of course he will rule in favour of Johnnie!!

[@meredithbirkholz5724]

Yes he did. He played to the Judges ego and Ito falls for it. When the prosecution objects - Johnnie would answer the prosecution’s objections before Ito can respond.

[@EmilyMontoya-sh8vn]

So sorry Mr. Goldman ❤

[@LLittleLessons]

I was 14 when this was going on,I remember that was the year I changed my mind about being a lawyer. Granted they were doing their job but I just kept thinking a lawyer is someone who helps rich murderers.

[@jadedheartsz]

O.J. didn't kill anyone troll

[@machi402]

@@jadedheartsz yes he did loser!

[@keyzbrazy]

Makes no sense because Prosecutors are lawyers and defend victims etc lol

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

they lawyers did their job...................................................................... to............................................................................................................................................................. defend their client...............................................................

[@riverebec1]

@@jadedheartsz If OJ Simpson didn't kill anyone then Ron and Nicole must be alive somewhere.

[@sha11235]

The fact that they didn't present certain things was another blunder for the prosecution.

[@josephbrewer5523]

Can someone tell me why they never searched the local dump (where the airport trash was taken) in the effort to find the bag OJ threw away? It's my understanding when taken to the dump, trash is tracked. There should have been some kind of traceability for it.

[@kevinmalone3210]

The authorities at the time thought Simpson dumped the knife in Chicago. They were looking through dumpsters near the airport there.

[@DVA579]

They didn’t speak to the witness that saw Simpson throw a bag in the trash at LAX before he boarded for Chicago until 3-9 months later (I can’t remember the exact amount) and they found out that the trash can is emptied 3x a day… it would have been impossible

[@NomadChristian]

Oj was on camera from the time he exited the limo and boarded the flight. He did not throw anything away at the airport

[@patchandkayla]

Lang is so mad they messed this up

[@pooryorick831]

What a miscarriage of justice. Does anybody still think OJ is innocent? He so obviously did it. He made a lousy criminal, leaving such a huge trail of evidence behind him. But he was rich and famous. Almost nobody wanted to see The Juice in prison. He was a beloved figure, especially in downtown LA where people live and die over Trojan football. But he still did it. The prosecution made some criminal blunders but in the end his public persona and the cache of high powered lawyers allowed him to buy his way out of a double homicide charge. Not guilty was the proper verdict given how the prosecution failed to present the evidence, the way the defense was able to destroy the testimony of two critical witnesses, and the judge becoming starstruck and playing to the cameras. But it was still a miscarriage of justice. The judge and prosecutors are responsible for that.

[@QuatMan]

After watching this entire trial, we KNOW he is innocent. There was not a huge trail of evidence. That is why he was deemed not guilty. The prosecution did a great job of presenting the poorly planted "evidence". Maybe they will do a better job next time.

[@LynxStarAuto]

@@QuatMan they did. That's why they destroyed him in the civil trial.

[@QuatMan]

@@LynxStarAuto The good thing is that OJ was smart enough to move his money so that they never see a dime of it. The bar at civil trials are considerably lower. Looks like they will be ignoring Ron Goldman, who had 2 close friends murked in a similar manner as him ( Micahel Nig and Brett Cantor), and his shady past till one of them drops.

[@jadedheartsz]

yes plenty of people do, especially non-white ones, "huge trail of evidence" my ass fool, actually he was popular in prison. miscarriage my ass.

[@jadedheartsz]

@@LynxStarAuto no troll, he lost in the civil trial because they had a MUCH lower standard of proof.

[@scotsummers5772]

Kay, these are informative and well done. Thank you for posting these.

[@ebonyrose4511]

Rip Ron and Nicole

[@goldenstatewarriors9418]

If by the end of any prosecution’s case you don’t think the defendant is guilty, then they have utterly failed their job. The defense hasn’t even started their case and called their witnesses yet. If you’ve only heard the prosecution’s side and already have reasonable doubts, those will only grow from hearing the defense’s side.

[@bergencounty6602]

Fuhrman and Darden were the weak links on the prosecution side.

[@cameron_fairchild]

Thank you Kay!

[@thetrialofthecentury]

No problem!

[@ameliareaganwright2758]

Judge Lance Ito was/is an inept clown. He loved to be in the lime light.

[@sharonharrison3611]

JUDGE ITO WAS OBVIOUSLY FOR OJ SIMPSON

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

no, and u forgot capslock, drunkard

[@brandonfarr6740]

@sharonharrison no question.. terrible judge for this case.

[@padraig853]

Alan rhe Limo driver NEVER said he saw a man walk up the driveway. He testified he saw a man walk in the entrance. When he drove in, OJs luggage was already dropped outside the entrance, exactly where he saw the msn walk from

[@theinquisitiveprince7095]

Thank you

[@jhhollier]

Except that wasn't Park's testimony. Try again.

[@NomadChristian]

@@jhhollieryes, it was. He even uses a pointer on a rockingham diagram during his testimony

[@W.Khairi]

Observing with almost disbelief the audacity of these defense lawyers defending a ruthless killer

[@Archie583]

Observing with total disbelief the audacity of these prosecutors bringing a case against a defendant who, according to the Constitution of the United States, is innocent until proven guilty, and then complaining that the defense, for once, has the resources that match those of the prosecution.

[@W.Khairi]

@@Archie583 The fact that the defense didn't/couldn't refute the condemning evidence of blood and instead resorted to play the race card - among other distracting tactics - resulting in the acquittal, doesn't deprive us the viewers from the right to be appalled by such an unjust verdict.

[@jadedheartsz]

OJ is innocent lying nazi troll

[@jadedheartsz]

@@W.Khairi STFU racist POS, anyone who unironically uses stupid terms like "race card" is a complete loser who cannot be taken seriously, "unjust" my ass troll.

[@TheInterestedObserver]

you mean.... the audacity at them doing their job?

[@sha11235]

Watching this as it is now June 12, another anniversary of this horrible crime.

[@sharonharrison3611]

Chris Dardon is a GREAT Attorney!!!!

[@LoveTeeC3]

When I watched the TV movie about the trial, it was revealed that he did not want to do the glove test, and that the DA's office strategically chose him to present at certain times because as a Black attorney he would go over better with the jurors...I feel for the man.

[@jadedheartsz]

nah he sucked

[@chocolatetownforever7537]

Great man, too.

[@darnylgaming4377]

Sike

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

and im the king of pluto

[@sha11235]

So the rest of this episode is a review of the prosecution's case?

[@TLHHE]

SHE COULDN'T LEAVE BCUZ OF THE MONEY PLUS HER FAMILY WAS USING JUICE ALSO!!! THEY COULDN'T LEAVE THAT LIFESTYLE ALONE!!!

[@Mws556]

GREEED BABY

[@neilevan7870]

you sound black.

[@bgiovannic]

I believe she was getting alimony at the time of her death

[@von4774]

Ito is so scared of punk Cochran

[@NkrumahTure]

Johnny Cochran was a great defense attorney. He performed his job well. He did what he was supposed to, zealously defend his client. What was he supposed to do, rollover like a dog for the prosecution?

[@raysolorzano8563]

How do you exclude evidence found at the crime scene that is directly connected to the defendant? Ito was the wrong judge for this case. In fact the prosecutors were the wrong ones for this case. Especially MC who got caught up in all the attention and publicity.

[@sha11235]

ET didn't leave the candy, Elliot did. Oh, wait, wasn't there a scene where he had gathered up the candy and put it down in a pile?

[@merimasviland6817]

That jury has said after the trial that they were too tired and they were going to get back for the Floyd case. This is f***** insane. This is injustice played out live!!!!!

[@nyyankeesbaby7]

U mean the Rodney King case?

[@cvance37]

Means Rodney King… but rest assure there were plenty of George Floyd incidents back then which went unrecorded. And so many Black peoples cries of Police brutality falling on deaf ears. Black people rejoiced at the verdict not out of Malice of the victims, but as payback for years of injustice. Just like Blacks voices of injustice were ignored, now black people ignore the white peoples cries of injustice.

[@consciousmachine413]

​@@nyyankeesbaby7these bots are wild...they often have an error now to entice a comment.

[@jakeviane1064]

The limo driver ruins alibi and Kato is great at playing dumb, he knew what was up

[@LoveTeeC3]

Yup. He came out later and said the "bumps" he heard were more like a body hitting the wall, and that he believed OJ did it.

[@jadedheartsz]

I think he really is that dumb, he sounded like he was high while testifying.

[@larrymcroberts995]

Kato was scared of OJ. He played extra dumb! Limo driver told what he saw I think.

[@johnnycash1365]

He was involved in some level, weather that was... Visiting the scene.. Killing one.. (part of 2 or more people) Killing both.. (killing alone)

[@rayray.0]

What exactly were the thumps that Kato heard? What was the prosecutor trying to convey especially when OJ entered his house through the front door.

[@jakeplissken9991]

Made up. The thumps are maybe the biggest red herring in the whole case.

[@robertclark9]

Cochran to Ito: “you don’t want to wait another three months do you”? This is where Ito should’ve said “I’ll wait until hell freezes over in order to give both sides a fair trial”. Now sit down Mr Cochran.

[@amir324]

The million dollar question that no one asked is how is OJ running into an air conditioner coming from the back of the house while parking the bronco and leaving a blood trail up the driveway ?

[@LaMostraVia]

Solid question

[@garrickgregory6403]

This timeline doesn’t add up. When did he take shower, change clothes, and dispose of all the evidence ? It has been over 25 years and nothing has been found.

[@leahcombs5778]

Yep.... and if he did run into the air conditioner, why was no blood found on the AC unit, the fence, or the ground in that area.

[@LaMostraVia]

I Read OJ’s Bodyguard Tom Gleasons “fictional” Book about his life protecting OJ and he says that he was stumped by that scenario as well but early on when he first started working for the Juice and way prior to the trial starting he made it a point to walk back there to see why he might have gone back there... in the book he says someone might have been going back there to dispose of evidence and mentioned that there was a building on the opposite side of the fence in line with the AC unit and mentions they might have climbed the fence and placed the evidence in the roof line gutter of that building and came into contact with the wall by falling off the fence or they stumbled when they landed. It’s a great book I highly recommend it to anyone who has interest in the OJ saga. Like I said it’s portrayed as fiction but a lot and I mean a lot of the events he describes in the book actually happened. You can cross ref them with KZbin videos and such.

[@at6686]

There is nothing that says OJ can’t go in the back way then walk out to the front to check on the driveway. He could have stripped his bloody shirt off or hit the the AC with part of his body without blood. Nothing magical had to happen to explain the evidence. What no one has explained is how cops and labs all decided at once to frame OJ and spread his blood and evidence everywhere and no one has ever cracked and told anyone else about this vast conspiracy.

[@bigtrevdogglbc]

Chris Darden was such a subpar attorney but so arrogant. We all know those types. lol

[@cindy9593]

The most horrible thing was that O.J. didnt care for his children sleeping upstairs. That is almost more shocking than the crime.

[@saffiyah4447]

Ok did not do it

[@Yadigar23]

So strange. The movie serie did no tell prosecuters won. Quite the opposite. They lost.

[@alexandria62753]

The Man is GUILTY !!!!!

[@theinquisitiveprince7095]

Guilty of being falsely accused.

[@kevinmalone3210]

Anyone who has some critical thinking skills couldn't help but think this way.

[@theinquisitiveprince7095]

@@kevinmalone3210 those low IQ personnel are the only people that can't see past B.S. of the news media, LAPD, and prosecution.

[@jumpropestairs6129]

Retested and tested again

[@sharonharrison3611]

OJ SIMPSON IS GUILTY!!!!!

[@jadedheartsz]

nah he's innocent troll

[@darnylgaming4377]

No you’re wrong

[@chpalmer2007]

Well ya. He admitted it later.

[@jadedheartsz]

@@chpalmer2007 nope

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

he is not guilty

[@maro3069]

I'm so shocked at the jury, after all this evidence, how the hell can they think he's innocent, how stupid and naive were the people at that time. He would never have come out as an innocent person today. you were just lucky that you got in front of an inexperienced jury O.J. your day of judgment is yet to come before God.

[@cvance37]

The Jury did not get to hear the one sided media biased breakdown like you got to. The Jury was not supposed to vote on whether they think he did it or not but whether the prosecution proved their case beyond a reasonable doubt. We let a few guilty go free so that we are less likely to convict an innocent person. It’s a better system than getting all the guilty at the expense of convicting more innocent people. In this case, the Defense had an explanation for everything and raised a lot of reasonable doubt.

[@maro3069]

@@cvance37 DNA doesn't lie. This man left DNA and traces, DNA from his victims and evidence of domestic violence were found on him. The case was clear, only O.J. Samson's defense misplayed and thereby confused the jury. And here I think, I'm on the jury, my job is to have a clear head and judge based on the evidence, I can't get confused. DNA is the proof, he should never have been released with such a horrific double murder and this DNA evidence. Forensic evidence is solid evidence. A fair verdict was reached in the civil case. It is a tragedy and always a blow to the families of the victims to see him live his life without consequences.

[@AngeliqueASMR]

One juror openly states she said not guilty , for payback that happensd to a black guy, I forget his name. But she said yes it was payback. It’s on KZbin

[@kevinmalone3210]

​​​@@AngeliqueASMRIt was Rodney King .

[@KingBoxingandFitness]

The Dream Team came in like internal affairs ..

[@kaloresikaloresi4541]

This trial shows that trial by jury is the worst kind. The jury was playing politics.

[@jadedheartsz]

no they weren't lying nazi troll, there was reasonable doubt, cope harder.

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

no. they.............................................................................................................................. got it right, drunkard

[@jumpropestairs6129]

Throwing pictures off the wall..27

[@gledatelj1979]

32:45 If the Bronco wasn't there at 10:25 and was there at 10:55 then that closes the case.

[@liannebennici9707]

Are they saying that OJ parked his bronco and walked up to the front door? At what point do we think he put the glove behind Katos room?

[@DavidMcdonald-df8tb]

When he snuck in the back way

[@MrDark21knight]

jurors should be arrested as co-conspirators

[@remopkr198]

Kay you the man

[@johnfox9169]

There wouldn't probably be much of a case if this identical crime occurred today. With surveillance cameras ubiquitous in metro areas enough inculpatory evidence would decide the case. Marcia Clark performed exceptionally well in this trial. It seems that only a confession or direct evidence would bring a conviction. The super strong circumstantial evidence just didn't do it for this jury, and that's all there was. It was VERY convincing evidence, in my opinion.

[@darbyohara]

The dna evidence would be a slam dunk. The defense would be presiding their client into a deal

[@TheInterestedObserver]

The evidence is very convincing but there is that doubt and that is the only reason why he did not serve time for this crime. Too many holes in the prosecution story, it does not add up, especially the fight with Ron. Ron was a 3rd dan Karate black belt and 21 years OJ's junior and in his physical prime. OJ has no bruises, cuts, scratches or swelling and Ron's fists and knuckles are swollen and blue, he was landing some blows in a fight where he was stabbed 28 times and still fighting, punching and kicking. OJ should have evidence of that tussle on his face and body and there was none.

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

ur right, he would be acquitted much faster today

[@kanyebreast6072]

@@TheInterestedObserver Actually, OJ DID have scratches on his neck. And its been pretty much proved that OJ grabbed Ron from behind, held the knife to his throat, and gave him some "threatening cuts", there were slash marks all across his throat that weren't life threatening. Then OJ stabbed him properly twice in the side of his neck, piercing the carotid artery, which would have substantially weakened Ron, and Ron would have been unconscious in around a minute. In that minute, any blows that Ron landed would not have been anywhere near as forceful as they would had he not been stabbed. OJ continued to stab Ron, but Ron was weak and did try to defend himself, but was quickly losing strength. Then when Ron fell unconscious, OJ went over to Nicole, sliced her neck and then OJ went back to Ron and stabbed him a few more times to make sure he was dead. Let's not forget OJ was also a lot taller and heavier than Ron, and OJ was wearing a lot of layers with would have cushioned any blows. It's very easy to understand how OJ did this

[@TheInterestedObserver]

@@kanyebreast6072 You say "And its been pretty much proved that OJ grabbed Ron from behind" sorry that is just not true is it, that was not proven at all and "pretty much" does not wash. A theory was presented that does not cover all the holes and answer all the questions that raise doubt which is why he was acquitted and not charge. IF what you claim was proven he would not have remained innocent. Patched up story, patched up portions of evidence compromising the good evidence, moving timelines. Truth is always stranger thasn fiction but the inability of the LAPD to investigate thoroughly any other conclusion is what got this guy off, they were too desperate to convict instead of calmly and cooly proving without a shadow of a doubt.

[@cindy9593]

O.J. is looking like he was caught. It is too much even for O.J.

[@johnnymurphy4475]

If Ron left the restaurant at 10pm he went home first to change his clothes how was the murders at 10:15?

[@DiMo28]

I believe that this is incorrect as well. However, Ron lived within walking distance from the Mezzaluna and drove a car to Nicole's which is also near the restaurant so 10:15 is not an impossible timeline, but I believe that he also ate and showered so it seems very shaky.

[@nyyankeesbaby7]

Ito on the law! 😂 Man alive Johnnie was so damn smooth..cant even be mad at him!

[@BillKinsman]

OJ wrote a book, "If I Did It. That was the last straw for me to make up my mind about his guilt or innocence.

[@wesleyfreiman4617]

That's right. The whole title may be helpful: "Confessions of a killer"

[@QuatMan]

A ghost writer wrote that as a money making scheme and it was not released due to backlash. There is a good interview on this channel in which OJ explains the details for why he allowed it to be written. Not surprisingly, there is no real confession in the book.

[@wesleyfreiman4617]

@@QuatMan Got it.

[@blue-calla]

@@QuatMan not true. OJ’s victims' families condemned his book & TV interview and tried boycotting them. The book was ultimately delayed b/c it was held up in court due to the book’s rights, and the publisher backed out. The rights were signed over. OJ was ordered to pay his victims’ families $33.5 million (now $60 million) b/c he was found responsible for both m*rders. The profits from the book would’ve been owed to the Goldmans & Browns. The TV interview OJ decided to give Judith Regan, where he creepily confessed to both m*rders, is where there was backlash that prevented the airing from 2006 til 2018. As for the subject matter of the book, OJ wrote it with his ghost writer, Fenjves. It was just like most other books that are ghostwritten where Fenjves interviewed OJ, who gave him the subject matter and details. Once the deal for OJ to publish the book fell through and the rights were awarded to his victim’s families, Fenjves said OJ tried to distance himself from the project and accused Fenjves of inventing parts of the story, but Fenjves said OJ read the manuscript 3 times and signed off on it before it went to print. OJ never disputed that in court.

[@QuatMan]

@@blue-calla Yes it is true. The Gold digging Goldman's want as much money and notariety as they can get. The Browns steer clear of the Gold digging Goldmans to this day...wonder why... The book was ghost written by a guy who does that type of book. Nothing you say changes this.

[@rastula8708]

OJ The Great

[@RedLeo-pf9yo]

Why didn’t Nicole’s parents ever show up to court?

[@brandonfarr6740]

@RedLeo they did show up.. maybe not everyday but yes they would show up.

[@TheMYERSFAN25]

Like I've said a million times: I don't believe OJ did it, but I believe he knows who DID. I believe he knows more than he's saying.

[@IanP1963]

I am reading a book by Norman Pardo at prez about Simpson case!

[@harlemswingdancehotjazz1205]

I don't think he did it solo; I think Jason was there too.

[@tqsuited]

Absolutely. He took a big gamble taking it to court, admitting nothing.. I guess he felt he would go down as an accomplice if he admitted being there and knows who might have done it. But the gamble paid off in the end, legally.

[@merimasviland6817]

And I believe that Santa Claus is real and I am a unicorn 🤣good lord, how much proof do you need? A bit slow or something?

[@woodyhayes7402]

Something wrong with that juror #6 and his 600 pages of notes. He just doesn’t add up

[@brandonfarr6740]

@woodyhayes he’s a former black panther who gave oj a panther salute after the acquittal. that cocksucker wasn’t convicting simpson if he saw oj on film committing the murders. that whole jury was a damn joke as was the ones that let the cops off during the rodney king trial. justice failed in both cases. difference was u didn’t see white folks burning the city down.

[@N4divers]

Johnnie and mutiple memebers of the dream team acted like they were on the side of the jury. They also spoke to the Jury through the media. The prosecution pimarily Marcia Clark were talking at the jury. Plus Darden sounded so dull. All that plus the bias most of the jury with ill feelings towards the lapd and the system really had the defense had a higher advantage of winning than the prosecution

[@mv11000]

Really annoying in these series I find the selfjustification of all the bumbling police officers. Had they done their jobs well, OJ wouldn't have stood a chance.

[@chocolatetownforever7537]

Not so sure it mattered with that jury.

[@theinquisitiveprince7095]

Had they done their jobs well. The LAPD would have pursued the real culprits of those horrible crimes. Instead, the LAPD was determined to make mistake after mistake to frame an innocent man.

[@mv11000]

@@theinquisitiveprince7095 I beg to differ.

[@chocolatetownforever7537]

@@theinquisitiveprince7095 You ignorant fool. Its amazing how dumb people can be.

[@theinquisitiveprince7095]

@@mv11000 the LAPD and Prosecution should've investigated Faye Resnick and Ron Goldman's drug dealing activities. That's the best place to start.

[@crazygeechee]

Did they test the blood drops at the condo leading away from the scene? They never said

[@risingoneagleswings1776]

Around 15:00 the detective said " Hairs on the SECOND cap" Second cap? What second cap? There is so much that stinks of set-up here.

[@christoo5125]

There was a baseball cap in the bronco. And a knit cap at the scene.

[@risingoneagleswings1776]

@@christoo5125 I would expect the baseball cap in the bronco to have OJ hair. It was his. The knit cap at the scene, did you know they never matched OJ's hair to it? Just an African American male. His son Jason has one just like it. There are photos out there. Jason was seriously angry that day when Nicole didn't show up with everyone for the big meal Jason had prepared at Jackson's where he was a cook. Then he altered his time card. His boss gave the time card to the defense but OJ didn't want it shown.

[@christoo5125]

@risingoneagleswings1776 from what I recall the hair found in the knit cap was "consistent" with hairs taken from OJ Simpson basically a way of saying it matched without saying it matched. I think OJ was there that night. Whether he actually did the killing i just don't know, he would have to be soaked in blood, the car seats would have been covered in it. It's just one of those cases that will be talked about forever, everyone has their opinion and I don't think we have heard the last of it, I think more will come out now he died.

[@risingoneagleswings1776]

@@christoo5125 I totally agree. He came after the fact. Which is why his shoe prints were there. I strongly believe his son Jason did it. OJ covered for him. Jason's boss at Jackson's called OJ and said " Nicole cancelled the big dinner that Jason spent preparing and didn't tell Jason, he is angry and I think he is heading to Nicole's, you better get over there.". This was the the dinner that was to celebrate OJ's daughters recital the same day.

[@beckytaylor9003]

the blood ,the knit cap with his hair on it and ron shirt his blood in the bronco is very damming evidence oj oj alone did this!!!!

[@schakiarligonde1736]

Nope oj didn’t do it no was he able to take doe two healthy young adults and not have more blood on him all and on the bronco his son did it oj came to the scene after the murders happened

[@beckytaylor9003]

@@schakiarligonde1736 no need to argue with an idiot done here

[@chocolatetownforever7537]

@@beckytaylor9003 Agreed. He thinks OJs son killed Nicole and Ron, because she ate at Mezzaluna, and didnt have the Fettucini Alfredo at his restaurant. Seriously, how dumb can you be to think OJs son did it?

[@christopherrankin4769]

@@chocolatetownforever7537 I think his son could have done it. Bill Dear's book shares a very plausible theory. No evidence points to his son, but it really makes you question things.

[@chocolatetownforever7537]

@@christopherrankin4769 I mean, I can write a book about anything and make it sound believable. Its about motive and most importantly, the evidence. I or anyone can blindly just say LAPD covered it up, because its hard to rebut a faceless entity, but to me, the Jason theory is preposterous, and nothing logical supports it bro.

[@daviddavis3389]

Vannater ( det.)

[@Rasslinwithracism]

Denise Brown the one sister who Nicole cannot stand and vice versa was the only one who testified to abuse. She obviously lied on the stand.

[@uram9440]

That’s a lie. Where did you get they couldn’t stand each other. Oj guilty asf period

[@imadbasayev8541]

So his blood drops were found on the floor of the foyer of his house but there was no blood anywhere on the pathway behind Kato's room where he supposedly dropped the glove..........

[@terrellhopkins9205]

Yeah, so many inconsistencies. Why would he discard the glove there and not discard it with knife, shirt, trousers and shoes? All too strange.

[@imadbasayev8541]

@@terrellhopkins9205 The answer to that would probably be that he dropped it unknowingly, but that still doesn't explain the lack of blood or any other kind of evidence anywhere around the glove or the pathway, or the fact that the glove was "moist" when found and didn't fit lol.

[@terrellhopkins9205]

@@imadbasayev8541: so you’re suggesting the rest of the items were planted somewhere on that property?

[@imadbasayev8541]

@@terrellhopkins9205 No way to know. The only things that have been confirmed are that the pigs were proven to be corrupt liars, the criminalists were incompetent, the crime lab was a cesspool, and 1.5 ml of OJ's blood sample was missing.

[@anthonywillis7634]

Look, there were so many coincidentals with the case: * The Shoes and gloves. They were obviously OJ’s * The empty knife box in simpsons room and no sign of knife. * The thumps on Kato’s wall, where glove was found the next day. * Blood following tracks to back of condominium on the left hand side re: Finger cut. * Simpson not answering intercom for limo driver until the time that he walked back into the house. * Kato used as a alibi at 9:30. There was obviously planting of evidence but that was after enough evidence was found.

[@jonathan4712]

For people who think O.J. didn't do it. Let me ask this, why would O.J. write a book Hypothetically killing the Mother of his children and Ron Goldman?

[@saffiyah4447]

Because the YT's asked him too And it would have been a best seller = money

[@jakeplissken9991]

He didn't. It was a work for hire project that Pablo Fenjves (Nicole's former neighbor) was hired to write. OJ's kids talked him into doing an interview with Fenjves in order to get paid, so he reluctantly agreed.

[@rockmeister33]

Vannater was the dad in Teen Wolf

[@moderusprime]

Lange comes off as shady.

[@DiMo28]

Lange is overly defensive. Vannatter is shady.

[@marvinbrando722]

Who was the policeman that take OJ blood to the crime scene?

[@theinquisitiveprince7095]

Detective Vannatter

[@jiogcyihsugyiocjfdoivhphvw6821]

a liar

[@shanepaige6715]

No one asked when the flight was booked …. Was it done out of desperation after knowing what he did and wanted to leave … he caught a red eye.. generally not always but generally they’re last minute bookings ..

[@raysolorzano8563]

His flight had been booked weeks in advance. He was scheduled to participate in a celebrity golf tournament in Chicago.

[@Mast3rMindTalks]

How did Goldman get to Nicole home ?? Taxi ? Car? if so where was his vehicle? or did they ever think to call the taxi company to see who took him ?

[@merimasviland6817]

Idiot!! Watch the documentary or read the report

[@shanonkay907]

It says he walked to her condo from his apartment. Just a couple blocks.

[@jessejoseph7372]

confirmed leaving work at 9:50 from a co-workers... So he walked to his house, changed then walked1.2 miles in 25 minutes???Look at a map. It WA like 1.2 miles from rons house... And he is said

[@DiMo28]

He borrowed a friend's car and drove to Nicole's. He parked around the corner because you are not allowed to park on Bundy at that spot.

[@AprilCampbell]

I’m sorry Nicole’s sister didn’t have to tell that lie. The entire town knew how jealous she was of Nicole. I get she was trying to get her sister some justice but she was lying through her teeth. OJ took care of Nicole’s entire family at various times. He even bought her dad a hertz dealership. What I know best is that those children never wavered in their love for their dad even after death. Cato would’ve spotted the glove don’t you think⁉️ or was it being planted because OJ knows his own home. You have got to be Superman to make a murder like that the catch a flight without any blood evidence all of the place Instead you only found strategic droplets. The murder scene is obvious staged in terms of the evidence. You can easily see that much. He can’t be if you have rogue cops walking his hood around from one scene to the next. Psshhh. That hood would have left streams. It strategic droplets like that.

[@cameron_fairchild]

Right. They showed a demonstration in court and the person was standing behind as if he was behind Nicole and slit her throat. So blood should be all over the killer's arm on the side with the knife in it, and down to his clothes. Specs and droplets and a bruised knuckle ain't enough. Especially when some droplets have 'edta' in them like it came from the lab. And was brought out to Rockingham by VanAtter.

[@Flagrum3]

@@cameron_fairchild You have no clue what your talking about. You ever slice a persons throat? I doubt it. How would blood get on his arm? With the head pulled back using a slicing motion blood would not get on the arm or hand. Think!! The blood droplets would have come from his cut finger. It was cut not simply bruised!! The only blood that had 'edta' was on the socks.

[@teea2809]

In your experience ppl who argue with their siblings (damn near everyone) are favorable to them being killed? Nobody denied she lived a privileged b life with him. Not even her sister. But she was battered too in the process of that life, and the evidence pointed to him when she was murdered. Point blank

[@QuatMan]

I agree. That bloody mess with even a boot print aaaand...5 drops of Ojs blood, 4 smudges on the armrest, blood droplets that magically appear 2 months later, no blood tracked ANYWHERE in OJs Bronco or home, one small cut on the finger that magically got there without piercing the glove, a sock and gloves that magically appear where they weren't before...I mean LAWD! All this "evidence" points to shoddy evidence planting by incompetent cops that were not prepared for this corruption to picked apart by this laser focused team.

[@cameron_fairchild]

@@QuatMan Well said. Agreed.

[@christophersermeno8631]

Furhman planted those Reeses Pieces....😂😂😂

[@kevinmalone3210]

When Simpson was trying on the gloves, he could've made a break for it. There were only 2 bailiffs close by, that he would've had no trouble getting past, lol.

[@erikledmad]

Mr Darden, they did put on a show and was a hit with the jury 😂

[@EmilyMontoya-sh8vn]

See that jaw tighten before he looked at Marcia. He's a monster.

[@Keeshablu]

Everyone should know that all the evidence points to one person & one person only O.J & he could care less about the evidence they found or they have he knew he would be found NOT Guilty when he is GUILTY AS SIN . I feel bad for the Brown family & the Goldman family they had to sit & here thru all this horrible horrible murder trial. R.I.P NICOLE & RON my heart goes out to the families. NO JUSTICE FOR THE VICTIMS IN THIS MURDER TRIAL. SO SAD A EVIL MAN WALKS FREE.

[@Johnjohn-dt6hw]

Why is he guilty cause of 3 specs of blood as big as your fingertip??

[@brandonfarr6740]

@Johnjohn learn the facts.. ALOT more of his blood than three drops.

[@hood_TheJoker]

helluva thing to depend on a dog to nail down a murder... bold strategy Cotton..

[@ivorysanders3116]

Not guilty.respect the verdict

[@mexi54]

Thats true everywhere OJ went he left evidence. But he has the best lawyers that prove his innocense even with the evidence pointed in everyone faces. That's some best lawyers. So many at his defense to prove hes innocent when he actually guilty. I feel was him and Glen Rogers at the scene... Explains why they found blonde hair from other videos i seen about the case, but this video saying from a black person hair.

[@brandonfarr6740]

@mexi54 glen rogers wanted his fifteen minutes of fame. all the evidence pointed to ONE killer.. oj simpson.

[@daviddavis3389]

The thing that i learned from this was that OJ enjoyed Reeces Candies....thats not grounds for a conviction though...

[@angeliquerodriguez1215]

Did they ever give him a lie detector test? I wonder.

[@slabbusterrtr7690]

Nope idk why in the hell not

[@chocolatetownforever7537]

Shapiro gave him one and he flunked it as badly as one can.

[@angeliquerodriguez1215]

Chocolatetown Forever Damn I wonder how that got swept under the rug.

[@chocolatetownforever7537]

@@angeliquerodriguez1215 Well, they arent admissable in court. OJ first denied ever taking a polygraph, but later admitted to having been hooked up and taking a "practice" test. Polygraph experts have laughed at the notion. As far as it being swept under the rug, just google it. Theres a bunch of articles about the subject.

[@angeliquerodriguez1215]

Chocolatetown Forever oh ok. Thank you!