Google:Airbags were made in early 1970s Toyota in 80s and 90s:Nah fuck Airbags we live life on the edge
@Jan-grnjak11 ай бұрын
back then they were more expensive and they became mandatory only in 1995
@JonahLyman177610 ай бұрын
My 95 Tacoma only has a driver side airbag, was listed as a feature.
@GF-mf7ml9 ай бұрын
airbags are mandatory in 1995 cars before 1995 :
@You_dont_need_my_name9 ай бұрын
This test is in Europe and Toyota over there didn’t have air bags but in the us air bags where demanded in 1994 and if you don’t have a front airbag you can’t sell the vehicle
@jcwarner907 ай бұрын
My first car was a 1994 BMW 740iL. No airbags at all, but it was a tank. Volvo was one of the few companies using airbags before they were mandatory.
@zachbennettresurrected951911 ай бұрын
#1 They’re both Toyota Corollas #2 Airbags for the win #3 Crush points are better in the newer model.
@carbeastsm10 ай бұрын
Yes
@Francisco-j1e6 ай бұрын
the new corolla is the size and weight of a 90's avensis
@joshmanwaring38484 ай бұрын
I was about to correct you because the caption says mazda, but upon closer inspection, that is a corolla.... ig toyota and mazda are partners
@0w3nn3 ай бұрын
@turbogamer_982realthe video says it’s a Mazda
@underverse223 ай бұрын
1.the new one is a toyota auris
@rizzie806611 ай бұрын
The reason its like that is because new cars are designed to crumple partially. If not, all the momentum from the car will go to you, so even with a seatbelt, yould go flying.
@presidential32289 ай бұрын
we dont need features to keep humans alive we need population control we are overcrowded
They are actually sold under Mazda brand name in some countries i think
@KANAL4TV Жыл бұрын
@@zzoinks Stop at 0:01 and you can clearly see that the badge is Toyota.
@fred5977_ Жыл бұрын
I wanna see a full sized full frame 2.3 ton 1970s cadillac or lincoln against the toyota!!
@randomthingsstuff659111 ай бұрын
Its a Scion not a Toyota
@iqu60511 ай бұрын
@@randomthingsstuff6591 Toyota cars are sold under the Scion brand in some countries. Also what’s the point replying to a 2 year old comment lol.
@Sadsillybilly8 ай бұрын
The survivor got me dying tho☠️
@shrimpaerospace5 ай бұрын
Unlike the dummy in the 90's car
@julinarlie26847 ай бұрын
"Mazda al" The very obvious toyota: am I a joke to you?
@thomaschirila63726 ай бұрын
Love finding an engine in my lap. Makes my day ❤
@ChrisPatrick-q6k4 ай бұрын
In a 1950's car this happens
@SimbaTheGreat2 ай бұрын
There’s 20 years of crash technology between the two and a massive weight difference
@Secretaryaccount-zz7ct5 ай бұрын
That sent CHILLS down my SPINE :SKULL: :GHOST:
@neilpiencenaves4603 Жыл бұрын
Is not a 1998 toyota camery that's a 1998 toyota crollla
@zacjohnson840410 ай бұрын
It's not a crollla either
@Frusie6 ай бұрын
They’re both Corollas
@edrickocran6 ай бұрын
bruh its not even a crolla its a corolla
@johnparkes24529 ай бұрын
Wow it’s almost like it’s newer and better tech and design
@lukedavis4365 ай бұрын
The reason nobody talks about them is because nobody who owns a 90s corrola is concerned about safety
@AyRCeeАй бұрын
Nope I'd rather die with omom aka momo imprinted on my face 😂😂
@lukedavis436Ай бұрын
@@AyRCee totally, my dream Volvo lacks airbags (at least I think the 200 series does) Am I gonna drive it head on into a semi?...no! I'm gonna swerve into a tree or something else.
@Oddballtech25 күн бұрын
God loves us all so much that he gave his perfect son to die for our sins and raised him from the grave to defeat death. Through faith in JESUS we can be saved and reconciled to GOD. please repent🙏♥️
@lukedavis43625 күн бұрын
@@Oddballtech not even Jesus can save you from a head on collision in a 90s Toyota even you should know that
@connor72724 ай бұрын
Yeah It’s called “cars have been around for like a century and we’re still trying to figure out how to make them safe”
@Gtrrrrrrrr3 ай бұрын
They weren’t kidding when they said “Let’s go places.”
@okayipulluphoppinouttadaaf20127 ай бұрын
Mm yes, the ‘camery.’
@aZuLa_PiG5 ай бұрын
Airbags still cut the shit out of your face if you hit your head in the dashboard as they deploy, cause that’s what 9 year old me had to go through. But at the same time, mom’s car was from 2010…
@dogday2834 ай бұрын
My mums car is almost as old as her and she’s 42
@makiagrigsby8211Ай бұрын
@@dogday283damn what car does she drive
@dogday283Ай бұрын
@@makiagrigsby8211 you posted this straight as I got out of my sisters car after looking for my mossy spray but my mums car is a Toyota Land Cruiser series 105 or one o five.
@makiagrigsby8211Ай бұрын
@@dogday283 ur moms car issss what?
@makiagrigsby8211Ай бұрын
@@dogday283 woww thats a solid car with excellent maintenance it's no surprise it can last that long
@revelare_xvii62692 ай бұрын
Older cars may have more character, but that isn’t gonna save you in the event of a crash.😂
@e728cw11 ай бұрын
This is why cars cost more. At least you live.
@nonyabusiness41517 ай бұрын
They cost triple. 😅 They also can't survive a deer.
@theman58933 ай бұрын
@@nonyabusiness4151you think the old one can?
@nonyabusiness41513 ай бұрын
@theman5893 Yes. That solid steel bumper can do a lot. I once slid an 83 Oldsmobile Brougham Regency 98 into a dirt ditch at about 20 mph. The car bounced back on the road and kept going like nothing had happened. Do that in today's cars, not an SUV/Truck, and you would have major body damage, and if the airbags deploy, the car is considered totaled by the insurance company.
@cndvdxyhjblbilg2 ай бұрын
@@nonyabusiness4151old head detected
@Nameisnotimportant2 ай бұрын
@@nonyabusiness4151I’ll explain why modern cars are “weak” and can’t survive hitting a deer. Older cars were often made from high quality materials and because of that they weren’t deforming as easily. There is a problem with car being as solid as a rock though. In case you crash into something a lot of kinetic energy will be absorbed by your body leading to worse injuries and overall more physical damage to your body. Modern cars are designed to be more deformable which means they will absorb more of that kinetic energy and expose occupants to lower g forces during an impact. This is what saves people in crashes. Basically that metal that gets crushed and bent is supposed to act as sort of a cushion to hopefully help you walk away with ideally no injuries. It’s all because of safety. And while I understand your point I am glad that cars are made to protect their occupants.
@teerollings691927 күн бұрын
"why is not one talking about these car's crash test?" Because no one is surprised that a car with air bags and crush zones performed better than a car that's 20 years older.
@andyb2028 Жыл бұрын
People should talk about why there aren't crash ratings for SUV/light trucks and sedans
@AaronRodgeer8 ай бұрын
There literally is
@ProjectEurobeat6 ай бұрын
What are you talking about, they're there just like all the other cars
@Jay-ut9cmАй бұрын
What
@Oddballtech25 күн бұрын
God loves us all so much that he gave his perfect son to die for our sins and raised him from the grave to defeat death. Through faith in JESUS we can be saved and reconciled to GOD. please repent🙏♥️
@nothingnoone0007 ай бұрын
I still love 90s boxy cars because id rather die fast than pay hundreds of thousands of hospital bills and be in pain for the rest of my life having a debilitating physical illness. Just me?
@cjsantos62477 ай бұрын
Mad respect cause I rather do with the hospital than with the funeral
@DitiPeng4 ай бұрын
You wouldn’t die fast if it’s a low-speed accident, which would leave you potentially paralyzed (in the old car) instead of mildly injured (in the new car).
@ChrisPatrick-q6k4 ай бұрын
Your comment is BS
@nothingnoone0004 ай бұрын
@@ChrisPatrick-q6k ok
@RoadTo500Subscri3 ай бұрын
@@DitiPengmy big brother got into a crash in a 1997 Toyota Avalon. He lived, not paralyzed, completely fine. (an 83 year old man cut him off)
@bhoot1702Ай бұрын
Because some will say old car are more robust than new cars.
@RichardGaming-YouTube7 ай бұрын
Bro in the old Toyota got freaking obliterated💀💀💀💀
@JakubPyrachewsky5 ай бұрын
Because there are always myths about old things being durable in every aspect.
@JamzPlayz1552 ай бұрын
Blud leaned in for a kiss
@IDOWOH2 ай бұрын
Look up the dateline 90s crash tests! Its insane how far weve come, also the first airbag crash was between two 89 chrysler Lebarons!
@user-ec8kp6sn1z5 ай бұрын
The 1998 bro just got demolished
@flyingscotsman_a33 ай бұрын
To be fair to the 98’ Camry, it just got hit by a much bigger, heavier and stronger modern car, so of course it was going to be destroyed. Had it been hit by another car of the same age it probably would’ve faired better.
@TD_TD-TD_TD5 ай бұрын
I think people here talking about it, that’s why the IIHS created a whole new kind of crash test for this exact impact because of it
@AmbroseBurnside182411 күн бұрын
Bet the car was rusty asf tho. unmaintained vehicles are unsafe.
@Namenobody4153 ай бұрын
Lived but with broken legs and arms along with a liver failure, heart problems, mental issues, disabilities
@megaprimemaster4 ай бұрын
Then tell me that it’s not worth getting a newer car and make the payments. Had a 2018 civic that literally saved my ass in a 10 time rollover. My older previous 2006 forester wouldn’t have kept me alive as well.
@Emeraldcoastking4 ай бұрын
Idk man I was in a 92 civic that hit a knee wall at 65 then rolled 4 times I walked away. I think it's just very situational lol
@Oddballtech25 күн бұрын
God loves us all so much that he gave his perfect son to die for our sins and raised him from the grave to defeat death. Through faith in JESUS we can be saved and reconciled to GOD. please repent🙏♥️
@EdrielPinem6 ай бұрын
I remember being a kid watching these video before becoming a car guy 😭😭
@nonyabusiness41517 ай бұрын
I noticed it wasn't a 1973 Cadillac 75 series against the 2016 Mazda.
@83goobmoonlight4 ай бұрын
It seems like the modern cars have airbags. The older 1998 car doesnt have an airbag which would make even more chances of death from an car crash
@UmaysImran-zl6xe2 ай бұрын
Toyota be like: Who needs airbags
@MackyDriftFan11 ай бұрын
imagine the guy died with legs cut
@C.game0Ай бұрын
As someone whose favourite car is the trabant 601, eith legit 0 safety features, this looks worse than the trabi crash tests 💀
@gamerxxxx583221 күн бұрын
In our country it’s the opposite, the new cars gets destroyed more than the old cars, one time my grandma’s Renault Megan failed break and it front rended a 19’s red fiat well my grandma’s car’s back bumper was dented and the back left headlight was cracked, but nothing happend to the fiat only some paint that got on my grandma’s car paint, Btw hopefully u understand me cuz I’m not very well at English and also the fiat looks like a fiat uno
@petrnedved529714 күн бұрын
Newer cars are actually safer because of being more fragile. They have crumple zones - areas including the trunk and engine bay which are designed to crumple and absorb as much of the impact as possible.
@jazielwins72462 ай бұрын
Her: the 90’s car got destroyed What she thinks was happening:omg the old car won?!
@Bruh86568Ай бұрын
If it was a Volvo probably yes😅
@ItsJust_Sheza5 ай бұрын
Am I the only one who thought they had real people in it, like my heart stopped for a sec-
@bertaarredondo47973 ай бұрын
I think I like cars with airbags because if you get in a car accident and you hit your head on the steering wheel in the older version without your bags it’s gonna hurt, but if you have your car with airbags, it would not hurt so that’s why you should get cars were airbags
@yatnn1x22 күн бұрын
Well no shit the older one gonna be more dangerous
@UnfocusedKnight1114 ай бұрын
*2016 Has Beef With The 1990s*
@sahibgue77012 ай бұрын
It’s because one car is old and one car new. Airbags were not in all cars back then and it’s not that big a issue because now all cars are REQUIRED to have airbags.
@09RadBoy9 ай бұрын
Thats Corolla VS Corolla.
@bluespeedrail77319 ай бұрын
No one is talking about it because they most likely expect that to be the result.
@cjsantos62477 ай бұрын
A lot of people think metal vehicles are safer than plastic ones..
@rinzler32605 ай бұрын
@@cjsantos6247plastic cars?
@mostafakoji2 ай бұрын
crash test r awsome kep doing more
@Zedryc_694202 ай бұрын
Meanwhile the dummy in the 90s car kissing the airbag:
@anacabrita294928 күн бұрын
Thats how evolution works
@elochero103 ай бұрын
and all these kids want a beat up 90s jdm that they swear is the fastest, until the max out at 90mph and hit a tree and turn into spaghetti
@resky_vr3 ай бұрын
Hmm cause maybe people in the 90s weren't dumb enough to go 90 miles per hour into a car and the other car doing the same
@Frank_castle802 ай бұрын
No airbags...and we die like a real men...
@ahmetmutlu3484 ай бұрын
steampunk age airbags was experimental and mostlikely werent ready for cars or crash sensors wasnt ready ... i guess thats why you cant see on hih end brand/models
@PatrioticShephrdАй бұрын
I would still pick the 90s car over the new car
@petrnedved529714 күн бұрын
Why?
@kentdiano7 ай бұрын
About my calculations. Cars that realese 80s to 90s doesn’t have airbag . It release on 2009
@pixistix_7 ай бұрын
No? Airbags became mandatory in 1998.
@onewapani2 ай бұрын
What's there to talk about? Car safety has evolved over the years. There ya have it. 👍🏾
@Mr_Pigeon_GuyАй бұрын
Depends how hard is impact
@Bellingham26395 ай бұрын
If me and the boys got a car:
@yyk_yАй бұрын
“camery” 😭🙏
@UpsideDownCanoe6 ай бұрын
Almost like technology because more advanced over the years.
@ZENVOTSRS116393 ай бұрын
Mazda Artificial intelligence💀💀💀
@a.s.541029 күн бұрын
Because youtube is only showing the old corolla vs the new corolla
@noruwaado_san.hyougen9 ай бұрын
Me thinking that 1998 toyota camery and 2016 Mazda ai is real: 👁️ 👄 👁️
@emmali19452 ай бұрын
Because the 90’s didn’t have airbags
@justnick332 Жыл бұрын
That’s a 80s car
@andrewklokoc5229 Жыл бұрын
It says 1998 Toyota on the hood
@RokuRoblox6 ай бұрын
Toyota Quality: 🤮 Volvo quality: 💀
@vorleaklovesong970Ай бұрын
That is the worst car crash, but I’m not drawing that
@Tieigo02 ай бұрын
Ah yes, the Camery.
@shadowcat49636 ай бұрын
yeah my ‘93 eagle talon will near 100% kill me in a wreck! i mean a car from the 90’s that has the capability of going 145mph from the factort is just asking for problems!
@ErenFabianBERLIN3 ай бұрын
This is everywhere in the search 💀💀💀
@satanbirmingham9112 ай бұрын
Check out the crash test between a 1959 Chevy Bel Air (today marketed as a Chevy Malibu) and a 2009 Chevy Malibu… If this video blew your mind, ladies and gentlemen, I strongly recommend seeing that test video asap 😂
@JaccoriDavis4 ай бұрын
Me and my friends are driving in GTA be like😂😂😂😂
@Luke-v3k8mАй бұрын
Crazy, my mum has the Corolla white one
@Singlemethod42173 ай бұрын
Airbags obviously removed 😂
@trivelox154 ай бұрын
Love my 80s coupe
@R4l3yt7 ай бұрын
blud got out in a rule 1 💀
@claudineagoncalves64674 ай бұрын
No one is talking about it cause they failed to make the drivers seat they put it on right
@chilledburrito4 ай бұрын
The seat wasn’t the problem 😂
@Turkey124574 ай бұрын
Why is no one talking about this maybe bc it’s an older car so we expect less safety
@noodle_car6 ай бұрын
"no air bags we die like real men"
@HUR4C4NN6 ай бұрын
Even wheni looked at the airbag and wanted to sleep at it.
@LincolnKorman5 ай бұрын
No one talks about it cuz it’s so obvious that we don’t need to talk about it
@assim-khan76117 ай бұрын
Airbags are not the main thing of safety Build quality is the main thing
@ast45794 ай бұрын
No one‘s talking about it because the results are obvious
@thereallyrealplayer4 ай бұрын
If the world just drove safe, without any car to inorganic obstacle collisions, I doubt youwould ever have to worry. Even in a speedy rust bucket, you won't die just from coming into contact with any unexpected wildlife, at night.
@Moonz125 ай бұрын
I never talked about it because I never knew
@ChummyVR1236 ай бұрын
This guy is clearly a Mazda fan if he’s saying that the white Toyota Corolla is a mazda
@carrot_slayer_of_patatos11 ай бұрын
Both got destroyed but one of them is safer
@zsigmond19462 ай бұрын
in the 90s people could drive unlike now
@CJ_PROTAGONIST_GUY3 ай бұрын
First of all, its obvious that the 90s car would get destroyed, second of all, let the past remain past.
@CJ_PROTAGONIST_GUY3 ай бұрын
And also no one wants to talk sbout crash tests
@larryblood64813 ай бұрын
I'd still take a 1985 Ford LTD ANY day!!!!!
@kittycatsrulecars_playzАй бұрын
90s car vs cyber truck >:)
@petrnedved529714 күн бұрын
The Cybertruck has no crumple zones and absolutely shit build quality. I’m willing to bet if you put a 90s pickup truck of a similar weight, it wouldn’t fare worse.
@tampawakos2 ай бұрын
The 90s car driver would have lived in the steering wheel was on the left side, where it belongs.
@bolm-us6yb2 ай бұрын
Left steering wheels mean driving on the right side, which in turn results in the exact same crash but mirrored.
@jeremyamateur171919 күн бұрын
1998 Camera xl vs. 2016 Mazda gpt
@VuNguyen-vs3nn6 ай бұрын
Bc what you’re dealing daily isn’t an old car. Those got more steel and heavier than!
@nextplayz95434 ай бұрын
Instad of the airbag going off it flew off😂☠️
@ruthkale43925 ай бұрын
'Died' Yeah no shit bruh
@chester_urloss8 ай бұрын
bro kissed on that thing 😳
@berschneiderkorbinian8386Ай бұрын
The car from the 90s was meant to protect against a car from the 90s, no wonder a 2016 suv completely destroyed it
@Felon229Ай бұрын
No they would still die even in the 90’s,plus thats a sedan😂