Omega Seamaster Diver 300M Chronograph 210.62.44.51.01.001 Omega Watch Review

[@davidbrown9947]

I have one and a Bluesy Rolex, this is my favourite by far, and the compliments I get are second to none. If you know, you know.

[@blazeoconnor9899]

I’m always attracted to this piece. No matter how much time passes.

[@Hocksman]

I’ve been having my eye on this piece and lusting for it for a while now and finally bought it yesterday. I looked at the two tone one but didn’t like it. Too much going on with black, steel and gold. This one has, for me, a better combination of just black and gold. Simple and elegant.

[@rossdonison4999]

Congrats. I have the tt version and I’m looking at this one for the reason you mentioned. Enjoy that beautiful piece!

[@Hocksman]

@@rossdonison4999 thanks Ross, hope you are able to get your hands on one too.

[@chomik751]

Congrats

[@Hocksman]

@@chomik751 Thank you !

[@eth2636]

Oh holy crap if I only had the money I would definitely buy this masterpiece. I know next to nothing about watches but does that matter at all to me? Nope I'm not a connoisseur. I just love how beautiful it would look on my wrist.

[@mendipfox1650]

What a piece. I have the steel chrome version on a OEM blue strap. It’s a watch which is so impressive, it kinda ruins the other watches in my collection. I think other Seamaster chrono owners will understand this. It’s a bit like having a powerful SUV in the garage. Everything else seems boring. 😅

[@allankandakji1880]

OMEGA the pinnacle !❤

[@charlottejet4338]

That's a lot of watch! 😊

[@1570CHRIS]

Fantastic!

[@bigblue7091]

Top JoB ~ Omega ~

[@KaneChamp]

I've tried this on maybe 4-5 times. The strap is too thin for such an impressive watch, it just looks misplaced. And then the tiny little pin buckle on a solid gold piece that weighs at least 180 grams...

[@centrallyintelligentagency]

I agree. If it comes on the strap it should have the solid gold deployant too.

[@TamiCC]

wrist 18+ only, hi tim, no1 wears a watch that high on the arm, its a wrist watch QQ. despite the fact its a good looking watch, pity it just does not suit for everyone. its gigantic as a clock

[@nightstalker824]

You must use really small clocks...

[@crap8011]

You should see where Tim wears an Explorer 2! Half way to his elbow, lol.

[@jeffmccollum3769]

i love this watch, but i think it is over priced

[@branchclan6112]

Huge - but beautiful.

[@mendipfox1650]

It wears smaller on the rubber. You’ll be surprised, assuming you don’t have tiny little wrists.

[@DGenerationX69]

Better than that Swatch crap.

[@JamesAlexander14]

I’m an Omega fan, but I am constantly bemused by manufacturers who make what is essentially tool watches, into blingy contraptions or abominations. I would prefer the Nekton version.

[@robertposteschild2353]

What's the point of having 1/5 second counters on the main dial when the watch is 3.5Hz? You can't even read the sub-seconds.

[@mendipfox1650]

4hz

[@robertposteschild2353]

@@mendipfox1650 It is not 4hz. Please watch the video.

[@mendipfox1650]

@@robertposteschild2353 I own this watch. Well, a steel variant. It’s 28,800vph. For some reason tim keeps saying the 9900 is 3.5hz. Im 100% correct. Tim is wrong. Other Omega non chrono co-axial calibres are 3.5hz. That’s where the confusion lies. 👍🏻

[@robertposteschild2353]

@@mendipfox1650 ok so you still can't read the sub seconds.

[@mendipfox1650]

@@robertposteschild2353 well, it’s not a high beat, but it’s one hell of a one watch and done! You can easily time most things life throws at you. For me, mainly soft boiled eggs & stuff in the oven. 😂

[@stevephlyer]

Funny, those that buy a watch like this are only qualified to dive in the bathtub.

[@blackwidowcheergym9701]

I can’t believe Rolex hasn’t sued for this. Knock off of rose gold yachtmaster

[@Miaugma]

Not everything is „patented“by rolex. Some things other brands been doing for ages rolex does too. But that doesn’t mean rolex „owns“ it

[@garyboyle695]

​@@Miaugma Well said, unfortunately some Rolex fan boys believe Rolex invented everything.

[@benmilesbc]

Looks nothing like a yachtmaster lol

[@Hocksman]

I guess because you see the blacked out bezel and the gold, you’re comparing it to the 42mm Rolex Yachtmaster gold? The Yachtmaster is not a chronograph watch, this one is. Plus the Yachtmaster’s case is quite slim, which I don’t like. And it’s only 42mm in diameter, I prefer 44mm. Also I happen to think the Omega time accuracy is a step higher than Rolex (nothing against Rolex, I have a few) so because of all that, I chose this one over the YM (which incidentally is the cheaper watch). Now, based on the above differences, how on earth is one a knock-off of the other, when they have such different characteristics ?? I think you don’t really understand watches.