One Last Chance: The Trial of Scott Peterson l 20/20 l PART 4

Neighbors report suspicious activity to investigators in Laci Peterson's case: Part 4
A burglary was reported across the street from the Petersons’ home on the day Laci Peterson went missing. Neighbors said they saw her walking the dog after Scott Peterson had left.
WATCH THE FULL EPISODE OF 20/20: bit.ly/3weRyR9
#ABCNews #ABC2020 #Documentary

[@madeline6850]

He' 'hid' at the candle ceremony because he didn't want h is girlfriend to see h im on TV. Cold as y ou can get.

[@msmithrandir561]

So now 20 yrs later we have witnesses/kidnappers? Give me a break! Total BS. He sold her Car. He knew she was never coming back.

[@sophie8394]

There are no witnesses. More lies from Janey Peterson and Pat Harris.

[@nathana2215]

With all the cash his family was slipping him he could have rented a truck. He knew she wasn't coming back.

[@aok4418]

So why does all the evidence point straight to the people involved in the Medina burglary. The witnesses were there in 2002 and 2003. This isn't new information. You just haven't read it. Over a dozen very credible witnesses. At least 10 of those witnesses described Laci down to the breed of her dog. And it wasn't another woman like at least of the MPD detectives had lied about. ALLEGED LOOK ALIKES JORDAN VISOLA-PRESCOTT Jodan Visola-Prescott lives on the same street as the Petersons and testified that in late December 2002, she was 4 1/2 months pregnant with twins and frequently walked her border collie- Labrador mix at La Loma Park. Her photo showed her holding her swollen belly with her brown hair falling on her shoulders like Laci.On cross-examination, she acknowledged that she usually pulled her daughter in a red wagon during walks. ELIZABETH GUPTILL Guptill lives near the Petersons and was five months pregnant in late December 2002. She does not have a dog but often walked in the neighborhood around that time. JILL LEAR Lear lives near the Petersons and was 6 1/2 to 7 months pregnant in late December 2002. Photos were shown of her posed in black tights like the ones Laci Peterson often wore walking. She often walked her dog in the neighborhood and at La Loma Park around that time but does not think she went on a walk on Dec. 24. *********** During his cross-examinations, Geragos pointed out that the women were hardly carbon copies of Laci in either habits or appearance. He noted that Lear's dog was a small Australian Shepherd with a black-and-white coat drastically different from Mackenzie's blond coat. Bisola-Brescott's black-and-white spotted border collie and Labrador retriever mix also scarcely resembled Mackenzie. -Over a dozen witnesses had described Laci even down to the breed of her dog on the 24th. You Said police found a woman that walked that day that resembled Laci and had a similar breed of dog. That's false! Here are the people interviewed. Elizabeth Guptill, pregnant walker with son in jogging stroller, no dog, didn’t walk in December Janet Kenworthy, Park walker with white Huskie mix (she didn’t testify), worked on 24th, thinks husband walked the dog that day Jill Lear, pregnant walker with Australian Shepherd, didn’t walk 24th Joan Lee, pregnant walker with chocolate Lab and Husband, didn’t walk 24th Melba Martinez, La Loma walker with 2 Golden Retrievers, didn’t remember if she walked 24th Dianne Merenda, blond, not pregnant, Park walker with Golden Retriever, didn’t walk 24th Patricia Mewhinney, long blonde hair, Park walker w/German Shepherd/Black Lab mix, drove and then walked on 24th east from Phoenix Amy Neumann, pregnant walker with apricot standard Poodle, not walking in December Jordan Visola-Prescott, pregnant neighborhood walker with black/white Border Collie/Lab mix and Red Flyer red wagon with daughter in it, 99% sure she didn’t walk on the 24th Kim Westphal, not pregnant, long brown hair, neighborhood walker with Golden Retriever and a friend, 14766 : Kim Westfall (Westphal); she was walking with a friend on 12-24 at 11:30 Michelle Dean (Merced Co. DA, Laci look-alike with Golden Retriever named McKenzie), did not walk on December 24

[@sophie8394]

@@aok4418 list the evidence that points to the Medina burglary. This should be good 😂😂 Why didn't these witnesses testify genius?

[@sophie8394]

@@aok4418 I'm sure that big fat $500,000 reward had nothing to do with all of these witnesses coming forward and describing her right down to her breed of dog that was on every flyer

[@dionne8611]

He wasn't on the stage as he didn't want his mistress seeing him on the news. He's guilty as sin.

[@kcoffman3210]

And he told his mistress he wasn’t married. Hmm

[@pattydykes8214]

He is guilty he did it and he knows he did it!!!!!

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

Yep!

[@VideoFanatic02]

Guilty as heck.

[@aok4418]

@@VideoFanatic02 Sure Reneenay

[@wm3277]

Scott is and will be guilty forever...

[@jimc6687]

Peterson's sister-in-law lives on a famous river in Egypt!!

[@simcastpodvids]

Jim C DE-NILE!

[@jimc6687]

@@simcastpodvids E-XACT-A-MUNDO!! Janney Peterson wants Scott to get a retrial almost exclusively based on the fact that the innocent authorities tried to get as much information out there to assist with trying to find Laci and mentioned her husband was away that morning on the 24th fishing in the San Francisco Bay! Janney's theory is that Laci's actual murderers cashed in on this alibi by driving Laci's dead body to the bay to dump it so Scott would be blamed!!?? Ridiculous!!

[@jessicapeoples3683]

She has a bird brain 🧠

[@jimc6687]

@@jessicapeoples3683 Might actually be giving the poor girl too much credit but I can certainly live with that statement, Jessica!! :> )

[@BrookelLakeKC]

@@jimc6687omg I hadn’t put it together like that! That sounds delusional. Scott’s mom seemed to be that way too, but more sinister. Scott’s sister seems genuinely nice but clueless. Now he has the appeal process going🙄 I feel terrible for Sharon Rocha going thru this bs again and that a non-profit is assisting him with the appeal.

[@marcelaruby84]

An innocent man doesn’t dye his hair and run south to the border

[@transformation5469]

Nope

[@aok4418]

DID NOT FLEE He wasn't even close the the Border. The only reason he was even in Southern California was because he was essentially forced from his home. There was constant traffic driving by their home, media was camped out there, their home had been stripped of many items during the search warrants (none of which had any evidentiary value), radio DJs called out to him with bullhorns while airing their show live from in front of his house, his house had been broken into, and the volunteer center and any effort to find Laci alive had ended in Modesto. "Scott's trips to southern California are confirmed by police surveillance and the testimony of Officer Skultety. Not only were the police aware that Scott was in southern California, but there is no testimony that Scott ever attempted to flee. Scott not only made multiple trips to San Diego, he also went to Guadalajara, Mexico and came back on a business trip in early February. He left Los Angeles for Guadalajara on February 3rd and returned on February 7th. The police were aware that he was going there. See the testimony of Detective Grogan for confirmation. "On the way to the golf course, Scott called his brother, Joe, and told him he wasn't going to be able to come because he was being followed. In this conversation he indicated that he thought he was being followed by the media. This conversation was recorded and entered as exhibit D8X." The camping gear in Scott's car was bought in March at REI, near the soccer field where he had attended his nephew's soccer game. Scott's friend, Mike Richardson, testified that he knew Scott enjoyed camping. Jackie, was going to loan John the money to buy out Scott. John was then going to take over the payments. On April 8, 2003, Jackie went to Bank of America to withdraw $10,000 from an old account she rarely used. She did not know her account number, so she gave them her social security number to look it up. Unbeknownst to Jackie, she was listed on Scott and Laci's checking account as well. (Jackie had opened that account with Scott in 1991. Scott added Laci when they were married and never removed his mother.) The bank gave Jackie $10,000 from Scott's checking account. The withdrawal receipt was entered as Exhibit D8Y1. Jackie paid Scott $8000 cash for his equity in the Dodge pick up. She paid him cash so he could better negotiate while shopping for a car. On April 12, 2003, Scott purchased a Mercedes from Michael Griffin. He paid him with 36 $100 bills. Scott had $4400 left of the $8000 his mother had given him. Scott discovers the $10,000 withdrawal from his bank account. He sees the withdrawal ticket signed by his mom and calls her. Jackie then goes to Washington Mutual on April 17th and withdraws $10,000 cash out of her account. She gives the money to Scott that day to replace the money she took out of his account. She paid him in cash so that the bank would not put a hold on the funds. Scott now has roughly $14,400 in cash. Scott is arrested the morning of April 18th . He had yet to deposit the money his mother had given him the day before. Scott also had some "foreign currency" with him when he was arrested. The 2 bills were photographed with other items and entered as People's Exhibit 293-29. One bill is worth 50 pesos and the other is worth 20 pesos. This is roughly worth $6.40 US. This is not an unreasonable amount of pocket change for someone who had recently returned from Mexico.

[@miagardner541]

HE SURE DOESN'T!

[@marcelaruby84]

@@aok4418 DAMN! YOUR ALL UP IN HIS NUTS 🥜 I didn’t ask for a fiction story

[@aok4418]

@@marcelaruby84 Damn you're ignorant!

[@sistergrace9833]

When Scott talks he looks guilty as sin .

[@jazminrodriguez9026]

Factz🙅🏽‍♀️

[@SUGAR_XYLER]

When he was asked if he killed his wife he was smiling when he answered !!

[@belauyong]

He’s repulsive.

[@carrieday8423]

Another Chris watts acting like they care soo much with thier phony ass looks and comments ...

[@reeceecup8969]

Yesss omg that’s the only thing that makes me feel he’s truly guilty . It’s all in his eyes . That’s why when I lie I completely avoid eye contact

[@deniseleaps]

What may have happened is that Lacy found out about Amber and confronted Scott about it. He killed her the night before and had time to come up with a plan to go fishing and conceal her body in the boat and dump her in the bay.

[@jacquelynjones1023]

Makes logical sense but doesn't

[@mrsdee47]

She was seen walking the dog the next day. So he must have killed her when she got home, then went “fishing”.

[@deniseleaps]

@@mrsdee47 They reported that it was another lady with a dog that looked like her. She was also pregnant and walking her dog.

[@cl9824]

@@deniseleaps That's right Denise, it was someone who "looked" like Laci. Also, I was wondering how crowded the bay would be on Christmas Eve when it's cold and rainy. SP definitely could have carried this out during the day, and SP was the only one saying he was fishing in the Bay. Whose says he "stayed" in the Bay, could have gone outside the Bay. He has one of the creepiest voices I have ever heard.

[@PrincessZaire100]

@@cl9824 as someone from SF, no one in their right mind would go into that Bay while the weather is bad. We know better

[@nitagirl614]

Of course Laci didn't walk the dog. Her purse, keys, cell phone were all left at the house. Her shoes were left at the house as well. And by all accounts, Laci stopped walking the dog in October and went on maternity leave in November because she was always tired.

[@aok4418]

Over a dozen eye witness. At least 10 of those witnesses described Laci down to the breed her of dog Einstein. Don't say it was another walker, because they couldn't find a woman that walked that day and matched Laci's description. -LOOK ALIKES JORDAN VISOLA-PRESCOTT Jodan Visola-Prescott lives on the same street as the Petersons and testified that in late December 2002, she was 4 1/2 months pregnant with twins and frequently walked her border collie- Labrador mix at La Loma Park. Her photo showed her holding her swollen belly with her brown hair falling on her shoulders like Laci.On cross-examination, she acknowledged that she usually pulled her daughter in a red wagon during walks. ELIZABETH GUPTILL Guptill lives near the Petersons and was five months pregnant in late December 2002. She does not have a dog but often walked in the neighborhood around that time. JILL LEAR Lear lives near the Petersons and was 6 1/2 to 7 months pregnant in late December 2002. Photos were shown of her posed in black tights like the ones Laci Peterson often wore walking. She often walked her dog in the neighborhood and at La Loma Park around that time but does not think she went on a walk on Dec. 24. *********** During his cross-examinations, Geragos pointed out that the women were hardly carbon copies of Laci in either habits or appearance. He noted that Lear's dog was a small Australian Shepherd with a black-and-white coat drastically different from Mackenzie's blond coat. Bisola-Brescott's black-and-white spotted border collie and Labrador retriever mix also scarcely resembled Mackenzie. Elizabeth Guptill, pregnant walker with son in jogging stroller, no dog, didn’t walk in December Janet Kenworthy, Park walker with white Huskie mix (she didn’t testify), worked on 24th, thinks husband walked the dog that day Jill Lear, pregnant walker with Australian Shepherd, didn’t walk 24th Joan Lee, pregnant walker with chocolate Lab and Husband, didn’t walk 24th Melba Martinez, La Loma walker with 2 Golden Retrievers, didn’t remember if she walked 24th Dianne Merenda, blond, not pregnant, Park walker with Golden Retriever, didn’t walk 24th Patricia Mewhinney, long blonde hair, Park walker w/German Shepherd/Black Lab mix, drove and then walked on 24th east from Phoenix Amy Neumann, pregnant walker with apricot standard Poodle, not walking in December Jordan Visola-Prescott, pregnant neighborhood walker with black/white Border Collie/Lab mix and Red Flyer red wagon with daughter in it, 99% sure she didn’t walk on the 24th Kim Westphal, not pregnant, long brown hair, neighborhood walker with Golden Retriever and a friend, 14766 : Kim Westfall (Westphal); she was walking with a friend on 12-24 at 11:30 Michelle Dean (Merced Co. DA, Laci look-alike with Golden Retriever named McKenzie), did not walk on December 24

[@aok4418]

S. ROCHA: Yes. Yes. She always took her dog for a walk. Not necessarily every single morning. Because she is far along in her pregnancy, but yes, that was her normal routine, to take the dog for a walk in the park. Q. Okay. And you know that within that last couple of days that she'd also been to the -- been to the park walking the dog or walking McKenzie; isn't that correct? A. I don't know for sure if she walked to the park, but I knew that she'd been walking frequently, yes. From medical records and from Brocchini’s interview with Kristen Reed: GERAGOS: If I were to tell you that Laci had called the OBGYN and had indicated that she was concerned about weight gain, even after the doctor had recommended that she stop, and that she was walking again even though the doctor had asked her to stop. And then you get Kristen Reed's statement that she made to you that she had started walking again because of weight gain, would that change your opinion or your belief that she had been walking on the 24th?

[@rustyscrib6071]

Exactly! Janey Peterson cannot come to terms her brother in law is a murderer. She's in such denial it's scary.

[@rustyscrib6071]

@@aok4418 If there were all these witnesses then his attorney Garagos should have spoken with them. The reason he didn't is because he knew it was a bunch of garbage and it wouldn't help his case. It was someone who looked like laci. None of these people even knew laci at all. How can they identify her?

[@aok4418]

@@rustyscrib6071 How could they call witnesses tgat police didn't investigate Einstein. How many times do you need to be told Reneenay FabNayNay, Sophie, Laney Bobs, Mia Gardner. . .

[@debyecleide]

Scott’s lies are so raw ! His sister is really the only one who believes he’s innocent.

[@X3AmySarah]

She’s delusional

[@aok4418]

@@X3AmySarah How so? When and where did Scott transfer Laci's body from the truck to the boat in broad daylight? And why didn't a single witness see or hear him killing Laci or transporting her body anywhere? -Why did any and all forensic testing come back negative for biological evidence of a dead body in any alleged crime scene? They even tested the water in the boat, Negative results. -Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. So how is he guilty if Laci was alive after the 24th? -How did Conners body end above the water break and high tide line if he was in the ocean? -How did his left ear get permanently flattened against his head and a rectangular piece of material was over it? -Why was their no animal feeding on Conner whatsoever? - How did plastic wrap get knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested? Dr. Cyril Wecht, who examined Conner's body but who did not testify, told Greta van Susteren that Conner's head measured 28 cm circumference and his neck measured 20 cm (On the Record, October 27, 2004). 28 cm = 11.02360 inches; 20 cm = 7.87400 inches. He confirmed the measurements in another interview with Fox News, and expressed his disbelief that the twine accidentally wrapped around Conner's neck. He also conjectured about the baby being in a bag. -Why was Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been? Certainly explains why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made. -Why did police ignore evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction? Isn't it standard police practice to track down a missing person's last known whereabouts? It's not like they didn't have credible eyewitnesses that seen her walking on the 24th. Some called multiple times. Police ignored them. Sounds like tunnel vision and incompetence led to her death since the science proves she was alive after that day. - Why was there no cadaver scent if Laci had been dead in the boat, warehouse, truck or home?

[@animalloversfacts]

Because she's just as Dellusional as Scott and his family.....

[@aok4418]

@Animal Lovers Facts I don't believe they are delusional in any stretch. He's factually innocent.

[@animalloversfacts]

@@aok4418 Your Dellusional too.... Im at the Eiffel Tower Amber.... BAHAHAHA

[@joshiecamacho2319]

He was telling her he was near the eiffle tower when he was actually at a candle light ceremony for his wife and unborn child. GUILTY 100% Especially that moment he showed he was happy and smiling the whole time. Only crying in front of the cameras.

[@mazzadude]

What a dumb take lol.

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

Joshie, you nailed it!

[@aok4418]

That's a lie. He was not smiling the whole time. It was one picture taken out of many, and that picture painted an innacurate depiction. If he wanted to be with Amber so much, like some suggest, then why did he lie to her and say he was going to be away over the holidays? He returned Amber's calls before the vigil because she was constantly calling him and he didn't want her calling during the vigil.

[@sophie8394]

Smiling and yucking it up with friends. And fake crying in front of the cameras.

[@mazzadude]

@@sophie8394 How do you know it is fake? Your own bias can give you that opinion. No-one can truly know if it was fake or not.

[@thetruthtellerojisguilty4350]

He's as guilty as O.J. Simpson.

[@VideoFanatic02]

Yes he is.

[@briannadaylon90]

Yup

[@bohemianchic638]

E I FSU. S free the Rex ruxrexxfxqxqxbgiOILuuu

[@marlainetriplett2449]

And Casey Anthony...All 3 need to be locked up with Chris Watts.

[@briannadaylon90]

@@marlainetriplett2449 Amen to that sister!!!!

[@Ami-dk9pl]

Nobody with half a brain could ever conclude that SP is innocent!

[@Ami-dk9pl]

@Love Always lots of people have been convicted on just a fraction of what he has against him, dna isn't always there, especially after you go on a "fishing trip" and dump your defenseless vicitms in the bay!

[@Wolfiebadass]

@Love Always then why’s he on death row? ??? Oh yea because that’s what happens when you get found GUILTY🤣 not to mention he was fishing in the water she was found in or telling the mistress he lost his wife weeks before like you can’t sit here and think because clearly you don’t have a brain 😭

[@Danielle-ii8zc]

There's no evidence that he killed her ... None. Just that he went fishing and that's were her body was......

[@Ami-dk9pl]

@Love Always I feel very sorry for you. Yes, I also believe OJ is guilty, he is a narcissist too, who believes he can get away with anything, just like Scott. There are people who never give a thought about anybody else in this world, for example Chris Watts. Sadly, we all need to learn how to spot them and exclude them from our lives! And I didn't say "without evidence", I said with much less evidence.

[@VideoFanatic02]

@Love Always Calm down, jeez.

[@barbarahenninger6642]

They show the marina on a sunny day. The day he went it was cold, rainy and miserable. It's not surprising that there are few witnesses out there.

[@heidiho5179]

Excellent point. One of the main arguments in the trial was who goes fishing on a day like that?

[@tinatullin879]

@@heidiho5179 And it was Christmas..

[@katyburns9758]

@@heidiho5179 Especially if you chose not to go golfing because it was too wet and rainy...but yes, going out on the sea in an open boat is preferable....makes zero sense...

[@heidiho5179]

@@katyburns9758 I’m glad you brought that up...that was always a glaring discrepancy in his story, and one of the best ones. I can’t believe people forget everything they’ve heard about this. The most likely reason for those lies is he’s guilty. I can’t believe his white knight excuse that if it came out that he had an affair it would take the focus off of Laci. It would put the focus on him is what it would do, and it did. Adultery is a leading motive for spousal homicide. It would be very rare to find that there is an affair of that that intensity, where he had talked about leaving his wife and losing his wife before he “lost” her, and have it be unrelated to the crime. I wouldn’t necessarily look at him if he had been having hookups with escorts or something. But to have a secret significant relationship and she doesn’t know that he has a wife? That’s a really good reason to look at someone. I don’t think that just because somebody cheats they would murder someone, either, but you have to look at the nature of the relationship.

[@katyburns9758]

@@heidiho5179 Exactly. And stop to imagine gall of trying to carry on the facade of being free and single to your mistress whilst actually at the vigil for your missing wife. Pretending you’re calling from Paris. Affair to one side, if you were truly innocent of your wife’s disappearance, how could you concentrate on anything else, let alone maintaining a lie. Priorities pleases. It seems sociopathic to me.

[@wm3277]

He was hiding... He didnt want to be seen on tv..

[@mannysd6191]

Janey says Scott buying a new boat and trying to throw Laci in the bay defies logic, because of the hours/being crowded... how else could it be done?? She is in denial... Scott got a boat out of nowhere and Laci was found at the bay.

[@kellieneville2796]

I think her point is that, if Scott didn't do it, then whoever DID kill Laci could have heard his alibi from the media and dumped her body there at night.

[@Sumermak]

@@kellieneville2796 yes but it is well known that when wives go missing husband are usually the perp. Also the fact that she is as found right where he went? Seriously that’s way too much of a coincidence

[@kellieneville2796]

@@Sumermak but that's her whole point, it's not a coincidence if the perp was watching the news. I'm certainly not saying Scott is innocent, I can just see how someone else putting her there to frame Scott is possible.

[@Sumermak]

@@kellieneville2796 yes but really how often do we see that happen when wives are missing? There is historical proof that usually the husband is the perp. We have so many times seen it happen.

[@kellieneville2796]

@@Sumermak sure, but is that trend really enough to sentence a man to death?

[@cheechalker8430]

“….. and frankly, this isn’t about us being in front of the camera ……• Scott says as he sits in front of the camera

[@moviemonster2083]

They've already established there were at least 4 pregnant women who walked dogs who looked like Mackenzie in the neighborhood. It wasn't Laci. Scott had already killed her.

[@aok4418]

Completely False! They couldn't find a single person that could have been Laci. ALLEGED LOOK ALIKES JORDAN VISOLA-PRESCOTT Jodan Visola-Prescott lives on the same street as the Petersons and testified that in late December 2002, she was 4 1/2 months pregnant with twins and frequently walked her border collie- Labrador mix at La Loma Park. Her photo showed her holding her swollen belly with her brown hair falling on her shoulders like Laci.On cross-examination, she acknowledged that she usually pulled her daughter in a red wagon during walks. ELIZABETH GUPTILL Guptill lives near the Petersons and was five months pregnant in late December 2002. She does not have a dog but often walked in the neighborhood around that time. JILL LEAR Lear lives near the Petersons and was 6 1/2 to 7 months pregnant in late December 2002. Photos were shown of her posed in black tights like the ones Laci Peterson often wore walking. She often walked her dog in the neighborhood and at La Loma Park around that time but does not think she went on a walk on Dec. 24. *********** During his cross-examinations, Geragos pointed out that the women were hardly carbon copies of Laci in either habits or appearance. He noted that Lear's dog was a small Australian Shepherd with a black-and-white coat drastically different from Mackenzie's blond coat. Bisola-Brescott's black-and-white spotted border collie and Labrador retriever mix also scarcely resembled Mackenzie. -Over a dozen witnesses had described Laci even down to the breed of her dog on the 24th. You Said police found a woman that walked that day that resembled Laci and had a similar breed of dog. That's false! Here are the people interviewed. Elizabeth Guptill, pregnant walker with son in jogging stroller, no dog, didn’t walk in December Janet Kenworthy, Park walker with white Huskie mix (she didn’t testify), worked on 24th, thinks husband walked the dog that day Jill Lear, pregnant walker with Australian Shepherd, didn’t walk 24th Joan Lee, pregnant walker with chocolate Lab and Husband, didn’t walk 24th Melba Martinez, La Loma walker with 2 Golden Retrievers, didn’t remember if she walked 24th Dianne Merenda, blond, not pregnant, Park walker with Golden Retriever, didn’t walk 24th Patricia Mewhinney, long blonde hair, Park walker w/German Shepherd/Black Lab mix, drove and then walked on 24th east from Phoenix Amy Neumann, pregnant walker with apricot standard Poodle, not walking in December Jordan Visola-Prescott, pregnant neighborhood walker with black/white Border Collie/Lab mix and Red Flyer red wagon with daughter in it, 99% sure she didn’t walk on the 24th Kim Westphal, not pregnant, long brown hair, neighborhood walker with Golden Retriever and a friend, 14766 : Kim Westfall (Westphal); she was walking with a friend on 12-24 at 11:30 Michelle Dean (Merced Co. DA, Laci look-alike with Golden Retriever named McKenzie), did not walk on December 24

[@VideoFanatic02]

@@aok4418 Shut up Scott.

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

There was one gal in particular who really resembled Laci.

[@aok4418]

@@reneenayfabnaynay5679 Wrong. And the fact you don't even know her name is telling. Here are the people interviewed. Elizabeth Guptill, pregnant walker with son in jogging stroller, no dog, didn’t walk in December Janet Kenworthy, Park walker with white Huskie mix (she didn’t testify), worked on 24th, thinks husband walked the dog that day Jill Lear, pregnant walker with Australian Shepherd, didn’t walk 24th Joan Lee, pregnant walker with chocolate Lab and Husband, didn’t walk 24th Melba Martinez, La Loma walker with 2 Golden Retrievers, didn’t remember if she walked 24th Dianne Merenda, blond, not pregnant, Park walker with Golden Retriever, didn’t walk 24th Patricia Mewhinney, long blonde hair, Park walker w/German Shepherd/Black Lab mix, drove and then walked on 24th east from Phoenix Amy Neumann, pregnant walker with apricot standard Poodle, not walking in December Jordan Visola-Prescott, pregnant neighborhood walker with black/white Border Collie/Lab mix and Red Flyer red wagon with daughter in it, 99% sure she didn’t walk on the 24th Kim Westphal, not pregnant, long brown hair, neighborhood walker with Golden Retriever and a friend, 14766 : Kim Westfall (Westphal); she was walking with a friend on 12-24 at 11:30 Michelle Dean (Merced Co. DA, Laci look-alike with Golden Retriever named McKenzie), did not walk on December 24

[@nathana2215]

Bingo.

[@socal_ian817]

The fact that he was smiling at her memorial while his SON UNBORN child and pregnant wife were supposedly missing no remorse

[@torrihendrickson2536]

Actually, he had been holding his baby cousin and someone brought up a funny memory of Laci and it made the WHOLE GROUP laugh. The media just scrutinized his every move because they were so fixated on making him guilty

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

@@torrihendrickson2536 you actually believe that? Oh brother!

[@aok4418]

@@torrihendrickson2536 You are absolutely correct. The media told so many lies and destroyed any chance of fair trial.

[@cl9824]

Barely able to work up a tear with Diane Sawyer and his excuse for not being on stage makes no sense.

[@ritaeichler2066]

The fact is as phone records indicate , he was romancing Amber as the memorial took place! Lied about beong in paris...its all on the recordings

[@oregon32nursenurse43]

It’s hard to believe that their are folks who think Scott is innocent. I mean, seriously. Scott murdered lacy because she was pregnant and he didn’t want to be married to her any longer, and besides, he wanted amber.

[@aok4418]

It isn't hard to believe he's innocent you know the facts. People who know the facts know her name is *Laci, not "Lacy". Laci would still be alive today if police did their job and followed the actual evidence, tips and sightings instead of just pursuing the husband and ignoring crucial evidence. Scott P didn't dump her body in the bay. It just didn't happen. He had a 14' boat. He was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round. There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. We even have the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explaining to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found. Conner was even found above the high tide line and water break. Full term, tape stuck to his ear and plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested. If he wanted Amber, he would have made himself available instead of telling her he wouldn't be around during the holidays. He repeatedly told Amber he loved Laci.

[@VideoFanatic02]

@@aok4418 Shut up Scott.

[@nathana2215]

There are not that many if you compare to the people who believe he's guilty.

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

@@nathana2215 exactly. In fact, there are more flat earthers than SP followers. That says it ALL right there.

[@mamas-jeep1984]

​@@aok4418B frieking S Katherine! You're delusional and up Scatts an^$ on the daily.. Hey, speaking of the an^$.. how goes it at MULE CREEK prison?? I really look fwd to your updates😂😮

[@ichosecommonsense5295]

News reporter: "did u kill your wife?"Guy responds with ear to ear smirk😏, an arrogant look in his eye. "no i did not kill her" hes such a bad liar i can guess his inner thoughts..."let me use my charm act 😎 thats all i need to convince these idiots"

[@heidiho5179]

Yeah...he thought, and still thinks, he is smarter than everyone, including the experts. Typical of narcissistic sociopathy or psychopathy at its worst.

[@ahill4642]

Well said. It's sickening.

[@rosierose1917]

He's not on the stage at the vigil because he lied to his lover about being in Paris. If Scott is innocent then he really is stupid to set himself up to look like the most guilty idiot.

[@gqakathemagazine6111]

Defies logic he would dump his wife’s body in the bay but it’s perfectly probable in her eyes someone else does the same thing while the bay is being searched

[@cheechalker8430]

Scott could not have possibly taken a boat out into the bay in broad daylight and put Laci in the water ….. but a homeless burglar could have accomplished it Makes sense to the Peterson family

[@jwait1496]

Medical examiner currents GERAGOS: Okay. Now, when you talked to Boyd Stephens, he also told you and he was the San Francisco, or still is the San Francisco Medical Examiner. He told you that in cases previously where bodies have bloated with decomposition, that they pulled as much as eighty pounds of weight up with the body surfacing in the Bay, correct? GROGAN: Yes. GERAGOS: Okay. And, once again, you gave him, and this would have been on April 2nd, of 2003. You gave him the hypothetical of the chicken wire, right? GROGAN: Yes, sir. GERAGOS: Okay. And he told you that the water flow southbound was at four knots, right? GROGAN: In one particular area we were talking about, yes. GERAGOS: Okay. And he also said that, in his opinion, thirty pound of weights would not likely be enough to cause a female of that weight, especially wrapped in plastic causing additional buoyancy in the plastic to immediately go to the bottom, correct? GROGAN: Yes, that's one of the things he said. GERAGOS: And he said victim would likely have traveled with the currents for a considerable distance before any exposed weights could catch something on the bottom, or the current would allow the object to stay in one place long enough for the weights to begin to sink in the mud. GROGAN: Yes. When talking about the Richmond Turning Basin area, there. GERAGOS: If it had made it to deeper waters, it's possible the body would still be in pristine condition, right? GROGAN: Yes, sir. GERAGOS: Thank you. I have no further questions.

[@cheechalker8430]

@@jwait1496 lol Ok sure Laci’s body was just floating around the bay for 4 months and no one noticed

[@cheechalker8430]

@@jwait1496 Scott is in jail today because no one is stupid enough to actually believe that theory

[@jwait1496]

@@cheechalker8430 Nobody had to go out in the bay. Both bodies were discovered on the shoreline. In fact Conner who was determined to be alive until Jan 3 was found above the high tide level and water break next to plastic bag, plastic wrap knotted around his neck and duct tape permanently flattening his ear.

[@sophie8394]

A burglar who didn't even own a car much less a boat 🤣🤣

[@hulksmash4311]

Who goes fishing alone in the Christmas Eve? And who kidnapped a pregnant woman on broad daylight on Christmax Eve?

[@michellechristine2288]

No one.

[@aok4418]

Yet you think he disposed of her body in broad daylight on Christmas Eve in a 14' game fisher. She was seen by over a dozen witnesses. At least 10 of those witnesses described her down to the breed of dog. So who did they see. Because nobody came forward that could have been mistaken for her. So who did they see?

[@miagardner541]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/aIWshGmgdsh4f7s

[@mamas-jeep1984]

@@aok4418 He did it

[@VideoFanatic02]

@@mamas-jeep1984 Yes he did.

[@dominika1640]

Janey what proof do you have that laci walked that dog?! Any material evidence or is it just words /hear say!?

[@sophie8394]

She's got nothing.

[@AmberMUA]

GUILT AF. No questions.

[@SAVETHEKIDS-bn5zo]

Someone murders there wife you find evidence of a murder.... So what evidence did they find oh that’s right zero evidence... Scott P is creepy gross and selfish but all the evidence says Laci tried to boss the robbers and she made a deadly mistake....

[@VideoFanatic02]

@@SAVETHEKIDS-bn5zo Bullshit

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

@@SAVETHEKIDS-bn5zo hope this helps; Scott tells Amber he lost his wife a couple of weeks before she went missing, and this would be his first Christmas without her. On the day he said that to Amber he bought a secret boat no one knew about. He also made five anchors, four of which were never recovered. The one that they did have, didn't match the cement in the driveway, which is where Scott said he'd used the rest of the missing cement, proven in court. Laci didn't know about, nor had she ever been in the boat, yet, a couple of Lacis hairs were found, wound tightly in some pliers. Agreed to take a lie detector test, but backed out after his father advised him not to. Upon returning home, he immediately washed his clothes, ate, and took shower. After getting out of shower, instead of just calling Lacis cell phone one more time, he calls her mom and tells her Laci is missing. He told, at least, three people he'd been playing golf, before finally sticking to the fishing story. Speaking of fishing, Scott told the detectives that going fishing that morning had been a last minute decision. But, this was an obvious lie because he'd purchased a two-day fishing license dated for the 23rd & 24th, a few days before. Or, maybe he's just psychic, and predicted he'd be making that "last minute" decision! When he took the detectives to his warehouse, he led them to believe the power was out, when the truth was, only his office in the warehouse had lighting, but the warehouse, itself, was only lit by a sky light during the day. On the night of Dec 24th, the day Laci went missing, Scott was already inquiring about grief counceling for Lacis family. Really??? She's not even yet gone a full 24hrs! I've never heard of anyone doing that over someone being missing for only a few hours! It just seems like Scott knew she wasn't coming home. The next day, Scott called the detectives asking them if they'd be bringing in and using cadaver dogs. She hadn't even been gone a full 24hours, and, he is inquiring about cadaver dogs! This was a huge red flag to the detectives working the case! He sold Lacis car while still missing, before her body was found. And, inquired about selling their home before she was ever found too! He even wanted to sell it with all their furniture! Supposedly, he doesn't know if Laci is dead or alive, but has no problem selling her car and their home, with all their stuff in it? He told lie after lie after lie. Of course the big, well known lie was when he called Amber from Lacis vigil. Right before, during, or after just doesn't matter, at all! His mistress should've been the last thing on his mind at any moment during that event. When he did his Diane Sawyer interview, he was already refering to Laci in past tense. Another huge red flag! It was well known he didn't want children, and wasn't thrilled about Laci being pregnate. Even telling his sister-in-law he was hoping for infertility. Laci telling her mom Scott wouldn't touch her belly to feel baby kicking. He didn't participate in the searches for Laci, opting instead, to secretly go to the bay, park his car, and just watch the search that was going on in the bay. Instead of showing grief about his wife being missing he, instead chose to flirt with his sisters baby sitter. Offering to make her drinks he called, "flirtinis". The baby sitter was so weirded out by Scott, she left! In one of the recorded calls with Amber, Scott tells her that if the police find any evidence, he'd lose his freedom. Not a confession, but close enough! Speaking of phone calls, authorities secretly wire tapped Scott's phone calls. They're even more telling than the calls with Amber for just how deceitful Scott truly is! When the due date, of the birth of his missing baby came around, he didn't have a gathering of friends & family to remember Laci & Conner. No, he didn't do anything at all to remember them. And, that would've been fine, if he chose to do nothing, no problem. But, he DID choose to do something. Since that day was also Ambers Bday, Scott chose to celebrate it, by hiding a bag of jewelry and a CD, etc for Amber to pick up. It seems it was Amber he wanted to remember & honor, not his missing wife & baby. When a body of a baby washed ashore, and then a body of a woman who had been pregnant washed ashore shortly after, within just a couple of miles from where he says he was 'fishing', he never even called anyone about it to see if it was Laci. About a week or so later, he was caught trying to flee with just about everything he owned, BUT his golf clubs and golf shoes. I add that he didn't have his clubs & shoes because Scott tried telling the cops that he was just going to play golf, not flee! However, the list of things he had with him is just as long, if not longer than my list here of the evidence! I could go on & on! I know there's more, but I'm drawing a blank on the rest. Can anyone else think of anything I've forgotten? Okay so, one or two things on this list would be maybe a coincidence. three or four things --- sketchy, but okay. All these things plus more --- he's guilty, guilty, guilty! And, I don't even have it all listed here.

[@SAVETHEKIDS-bn5zo]

Bombshell There’s new evidence of Scott’s Innocence a video of Laci approaching the robbers.... Caught on neighbors video Sorry but he’s getting a new trial and this new evidence is Absolute Proof of his Innocence!!!! Do your research

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

@@SAVETHEKIDS-bn5zo You've been duped. There is no video of Laci on the 24th doing anything. She was dead already by the time the burglars robbed that house. LMAO! If there was a video, Janey would be showing it on each & every show she's been on. Some people are so gullible!

[@jenniferking4682]

Why I bother watching these videos in parts knowing they always leave out the last part! Plus each part basically goes over same info just to drag it out! Sl these pats could of been put in one 15 minute video!

[@m_christine1070]

Theresa part 5

[@vitathervil5440]

That man killed his wife. No questions asked. Those people saw nothing🙄

[@jwait1496]

That's false. The MPD should have done their jobs. They refused follow the actual evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it. He was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round. There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. We even have the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explaining to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found. -Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. -Conner was found above the high tide line and water break. -The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear. -Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested. -The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years." -Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments. -Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.

[@sophie8394]

You're absolutely right. Pay no attention to the troll. She gets a nickel for every copy and paste of garbage from the appeal page and thinks it's evidence 😂😂

[@mamas-jeep1984]

​@@jwait1496Teller of falsities.. fabricator, lying liar pants! Nobody cares what you think.. Scatt is going to get exactly what he deserves.. I'm guessing he will make a great wife in there.. top... bunk.. or ... bottom?

[@HomegirlfromKC]

they should make the videos longer so theres not so many parts (theres 5) and they're out of order sometimes

[@transformation5469]

He lied about being in Paris after asking the law to trust him? Is he mad?

[@fabiwilliams4644]

He went fishing alright & used his wife's body for bait

[@paulmc3457]

Thumbs down to 20 / 20, they are the king of leaving us hanging by not including the entire ending. 😒 👎👎👎

[@m_christine1070]

There's a part5

[@vha3742171]

Scott sister in law needs to face the facts. He was convicted. He went to the bay. Same place her and her son body wash up. Then at candle light vidule for his wife he tell Amber he in Paris. Why he just come clean at the first about the affair. That someone broken in to a home near the house. Kidnap her and dump her in the same place he went that morning.

[@VideoFanatic02]

Yup

[@marcmaza2821]

Scott was never upset in any videos! Family’s we’re sick and lost!

[@monicasaturn2514]

He's quilty af. Deal with it

[@lalaluvzbookie]

Give him the chair already

[@kellycampbell7937]

He gives me Nick from gone girl vibes except Scott is actually guilty

[@kallymcdonnell]

that book was inspired by scott

[@jwait1496]

The MPD should have done their jobs. They refused follow the actual evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it. He was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round. There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. We even have the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explaining to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found. -Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. -Conner was found above the high tide line and water break. -The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear. -Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested. -The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years." -Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments. -Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.

[@admiralkrankandhismightyba158]

Except there's no evidence

[@hulksmash4311]

How come nobody knew or was informed that he suppose gone to fishing alone before anything happened? Too many coincidences and just make no sense.

[@Trogdor1365]

At the vigil in the park, there is a very pregnant woman right there. There are other women that are pregnant and golden retrievers are like the most common breed of dog in families. The cops ruled it out because they found the woman that fit the description people gave

[@Trogdor1365]

@Pixie I was reading things the judge wouldn't allow to be revealed to the jury. The cops found laptops at his storage unit where he kept the boat. It was full of violent, bondage porn. I get why the judge didn't allow that. But he had also looked up info on the bay including info on water currents. When the police asked him his plans to go out on the new boat, he said he was just winging it and didn't have a plan.

[@heidiho5179]

Right. That was even said in this video. I guess the passage of time worked because people act like they have forgotten everything about this case.

[@heidiho5179]

@Pixie True. I wonder why the witness won’t listen to reason but she probably wants to get some more attention out of the deal.

[@aok4418]

@Pixie That's a lie. Police could not find a single woman that matched Laci's description and walked that day. Elizabeth Guptill, pregnant walker with son in jogging stroller, no dog, didn’t walk in December Janet Kenworthy, Park walker with white Huskie mix (she didn’t testify), worked on 24th, thinks husband walked the dog that day Jill Lear, pregnant walker with Australian Shepherd, didn’t walk 24th Joan Lee, pregnant walker with chocolate Lab and Husband, didn’t walk 24th Melba Martinez, La Loma walker with 2 Golden Retrievers, didn’t remember if she walked 24th Dianne Merenda, blond, not pregnant, Park walker with Golden Retriever, didn’t walk 24th Patricia Mewhinney, long blonde hair, Park walker w/German Shepherd/Black Lab mix, drove and then walked on 24th east from Phoenix Amy Neumann, pregnant walker with apricot standard Poodle, not walking in December Jordan Visola-Prescott, pregnant neighborhood walker with black/white Border Collie/Lab mix and Red Flyer red wagon with daughter in it, 99% sure she didn’t walk on the 24th Kim Westphal, not pregnant, long brown hair, neighborhood walker with Golden Retriever and a friend, 14766 : Kim Westfall (Westphal); she was walking with a friend on 12-24 at 11:30 Michelle Dean (Merced Co. DA, Laci look-alike with Golden Retriever named McKenzie), did not walk on December 24 Is this just a coincidence? 2:00-4:00 PM (VAN) Tom Harshman, a former reserve police offer who lives in Modesto, sees something that really concerns him near the corner of Scenic Drive and Claus Road as he is driving with his wife between 2:00 and 4:00 p.m. on December 24. He sees a young pregnant woman who closely resembles Laci squatting by a fence, urinating, with a tall white man hovering over her. Harshman sees the woman’s face when she is up against the fence -- that’s what he is concentrating on -- and he sees a scared look on her face. The man then forces the woman into a tan van, and someone else is inside the vehicle. Harshman's description of the van is similar to Jackson's description of the van used in the commission of the Medina burglary. He describes the van as an older white van with three windows and a tan stripe on the side, approximately a foot wide. The woman Harshman sees has dark hair and is wearing black pants and a red shirt (perhaps a jacket?). The man he sees with the pregnant woman is a white male, in his forties, and is wearing a ball cap. After driving past this scene, Harshman is so upset that he turns around and goes back to the spot, hoping to find the van still there and hoping to get more information about the license plate number, but the van is gone.

[@aok4418]

@@Trogdor1365 He did NOT look up water currents. It was fishing and boating regulations. Read detective Walls testimony. That was another media lie. This is interview with Brocchini. The phrase "wing it" didn't come from Scott. BROCCHINI: When did you realize you were gonna go fishin'? PETERSON: Well, that was the morning decision, it's either BROCCHINI: That’s a morning decision… PETERSON: go play golf at the club, or go fishin… BROCCHINI: Okay. PETERSON: It seemed too cold to go play golf at the club (chuckle) so um, ya know, Decided that ya know, might as well do that. . . . BROCCHINI: Okay so if you got the, ‘bout 5 minutes to one, you got your boat in, how long you think you stayed in the water? PETERSON: Ah felt like an hour and a half or so, but like I said, I didn’t have any lunch or anything, but see if I was getting home at 4:30, quarter to, I don’t know an hour an hour and a half I guess, probably be accurate. BROCCHINI: Ah did you have a map for that area or… PETERSON: No. BROCCHINI: What, you just wing it? PETERSON: Um hum. BROCCHINI: So you just, when you got in your boat you took off did you go very far or… PETERSON: Well I mean probably a couple miles, I went north ah, found a, like a little island kinda deal there. BROCCHINI: Um hum. PETERSON: Ah island ah had a buncha trash on it I remember a big sign that said no landing, looked like some broken piers around it. I just assumed it would be a decent, you know, shallow area. BROCCHINI: Did you troll? PETERSON: Little bit. I mean a lot of, lot of the reason I went was just to get that boat in the water to see, you know.

[@MiuXiu]

Only starts crying once the focus is on him and how the public sees him. I don’t want to diagnose a stranger, but I’ve been around a few narcissists in my life and he makes my skin crawl because of it.

[@aok4418]

You can't diagnose a stranger. And I doubt you're qualified. : Okay. Now, did you also say, in your response to Mr. Distaso's questions, that you'd never seen him hysterical, but you had seen him cry, you had seem him being emotional after Laci was missing, isn't that right? GRANTSKI: Yes, I had. GERAGOS: On more than one occasion? GRANTSKI: Yes. GERAGOS: He was extremely emotional, especially for him, because you had never seen him emotional at all before that? GRANTSKI: That's true. . .GERAGOS: The comment was, if I've got it right, he's in the driveway, is he standing with a police officer? GRANTSKI: He came walking up as I was talking to the police, to where I was standing. GERAGOS: Okay. And you say, How was golfing? GRANTSKI: Yeah. GERAGOS: Okay. And he said, GRANTSKI: He said I didn't go golfing, I went fishing. Officer Spurlock: Officer Spurlock: I saw Mr. Peterson. He seemed concerned. He had a look of concern on his face. I think he maybe even had some tears in his eyes. But as far as a frantic behavior, I wouldn't claim. Just frantic concern. … Mark Mark Geragos: Did he appear to be upset to you? Officer Spurlock: Yes. I would say so. Officer Evers: Mark Mark Geragos: When you saw them, you saw that Laci's mom Sharon, you know who Sharon is; is that correct? Officer Evers: Yes, I do. Mark Mark Geragos: She was crying, and she was very, very upset, correct? Officer Evers: That's correct. Mark Mark Geragos: When so Scott, when he walked up, he appeared to be very upset; is that correct? Officer Evers: That's correct. Mark Geragaos: And the other family members, you described them as just concerned, correct? Officer Evers: Yes. Detective Grogan: Mark Geragos: Now the, did you look at any of the interviews that Ms. Rocha had given, for example, to the Today Show on December 30th in which she says mom, that she said that Scott said, "Mom, is Laci there"? Craig Grogan: No, I have never seen that before. Mark Geragos: Did you ever look at the January 14th Today's Show where she said "I just immediately, I knew she was missing"? Craig Grogan: No, I have never seen that before. Mark Geragos: Okay. That would have been the January 14th show would have been two days before she was told about the existence of Amber Frey, is that correct, or the day before? Craig Grogan: It would have been the day before, yes. Mark Geragos: And that, at least if the transcript's accurate, she's the one who said that she knew Laci was missing just by the panic rising in Scott's voice, correct? Craig Grogan: Yes, that's what it says. Amie Krigbaum (neighbor): Amie Krigbaum: So I mean he, he was distraught; it kind of made me a little distraught, so I didn't really know how to handle the situation, so Prosecutor Distaso: Okay. Amie Krigbaum: I just kind of took bits and pieces of it and didn't really know what to do. I shut the door and kind of asked Terra, Help him look, or, you know? Greg Reed (Scott’s friend): Prosecutor Distaso: Okay. What, let me, before I show you the report and refresh your memory, what did, what was Mr. Peterson's, how did he sound on the message? Greg Reed: The perfect word would be frantic. Stacey Boyers (Laci’s friend): Mark Mark Geragos: You got a call from Scott approximately what time? Stacey Boyers: 5:26. Mark Mark Geragos: Okay. You know that now because you looked at cell phone records? Stacey Boyers: My cell phone records, yes. Mark Mark Geragos: You didn't just, Stacey Boyers: Didn't just pull that out, no. Mark Mark Geragos: Okay. Now, you get the call at 5:26. Was he upset? Stacey Boyers: Uh, yes. Lori Ellsworth (Laci’s friend): Lori Ellsworth: He had a different tone in his voice, yes. Pat Harris: He was panicked, wasn't he? Lori Ellsworth: Panic, maybe

[@aok4418]

Ignorant comment.

[@MiuXiu]

@@aok4418 I literally said I wasn’t diagnosing and was just going off of my own experiences. Also are you drunk or something? You already replied to me two weeks ago.

[@aok4418]

@@MiuXiu Just because you said said you weren't diagnosing doesn't make your statement any less ignorant.

[@VideoFanatic02]

@@aok4418 GFY Scott.

[@transformation5469]

Cold hearted and didn't care.

[@BrookelLakeKC]

Scott made Laci’s MOTHER be the front face of all media. Scott forced that on her too. I wasn’t a mom yet when Laci & Conner died. Just graduated high school in May 2002. 21 years and 4 kiddos later, watching this footage hits me totally different. He is absolutely guilty.

[@annem9402]

The most important thing, I think, of that, that I really want to make clear to you is, you did not hear a single witness who said they saw Laci Peterson walking in the neighborhood, or on Covena, or in the park on December 24th. You did not hear from this stand a single witness who said that. You heard officers testify that people reported to that. You can't consider that for the truth, not a single bit of it. You know what's an interesting point, Detective Brocchini was on the stand. He was asked about Chris Van Zandt, a man who had called in and reported that he saw Laci Peterson down in the park on the December 24th, and it came in as hearsay. Not offered for the truth, so you can't consider it for that. And that was the testimony. That was it. Yeah, this guy said he saw her, called in. Okay. Well, remember we brought in Chris Van Zandt, the actual witness. We brought him in and put him on the stand. Okay, fine. Let's hear what he has to say. Remember what he told you? He said, I know for sure I didn't see Laci Peterson on the 24th in the park that day. So the only witness who, the only person who called in to the police and said they saw Laci Peterson that came in and testified, told you without any doubt in his mind it wasn't Laci Peterson that he saw that day. That's the only evidence you can consider for its truth. None of these other ones. Remember the defense even put an exhibit in. I might have it over there. That's all right. I'll move on. The defense put an exhibit in. I wrote it in my notes here. D7Q. It was a map of these alleged witness sightings. And I think it included Tony Freitas, and Grace Wolf, and Homer Maldonado. I'm pretty sure those were the people. If I'm wrong, just look at the testimony, look at the map itself. Not a single one came in to testify. Why do you think that was? This is a very experienced defense team. They are very good lawyers. They obviously know how to prove facts if they want to. Why do you think they didn't bring in a single witness to testify that they saw Laci Peterson walking that day? Remember, you heard a bunch of evidence about Tom Harshman. Remember that whole thing with the fence, and the woman urinating, and the van, and all that crazy story? How come Tom Harshman didn't get up here on the stand? Let's hear what he has to say if that's true. None of those people came in and testified. You know why? You can assume because that what they were going to say was not credible, that's why. Remember Investigator Bertalotto was asked about a guy named Chris Clark. Remember Chris Clark? He didn't contact the police until April, 2004. He didn't know Laci Peterson. He never spoke to her. He said he saw her while he was working in the neighborhood. He said he knew this from his time in treatment for substance abuse. His problems obviously continued, because in 2004 he was under house arrest for his third DUI. I'm not beating up on anybody with a substance abuse problem. Far from it. But it's not right to ask about hearsay evidence in this trial and not put this witness on the stand. How come this witness wasn't called to the stand? The investigator testified just back in April he went out to his house and talked to him. He is certainly available. Why didn't we hear from him? We didn't hear from him because obviously his story was not credible, that's why.

[@jeremyanderson5063]

I personally think that a lot of the witnesses who saw Laci that day and did call in, decided to change their stories based on the medias portrayal of the case. Scott was convicted long before he had his day in court. I’m not saying he’s innocent, but I believe the police dept and detectives made a narrative and ran with it.

[@jwait1496]

First of all. You don't understand the definition of hearsay. Second thing. Almost all of the witnesses were ignored by the MPD. They only called back. I'm just going to paste what it says on the pwc site because I'm a tired of explaining it to you, Sophie. Pwc site "the area within a 1 mile radius of Laci’s house there were 26 sightings. Within a 3 mile radius, there were an additional 7. This is a total of 33. What possible excuse did MPD have for not investigating each and every one of these sightings to determine exactly what was seen by each of the witnesses? Grogan excuses the MPD failure to follow up on tips by citing Karen Servas’ 10:18 timeline for finding McK. Even if Karen Servas’ timeline were accurate, which it is not, MPD did not have information about her reinvented timeline until January 3. The detectives did nothing to confirm that her time source was valid. Grogan also says tips were not followed up because phone records indicate that Scott was still in his neighborhood at 10:08. This theory did not take shape until shortly before trial. Two prosecution witnesses stated that cell phone records were not designed to be used to identify location. Grogan also uses the excuse that tips were not investigated because witnesses reported Laci wearing black pants and her body was found wearing tan pants. MPD did not have this information until mid-April when Laci’s body was found. Then Grogan indicates that sightings outside of the park were discounted because Laci was planning to walk in the park. This is blatantly false and Grogan knew it. Grogan had been present on December 26 when Chris Boyer interviewed Scott Peterson at his home. Scott clearly stated that Laci sometimes walked in the neighborhood. He told Boyer, in Grogan’s presence that Laci had walked on Sunday, December 22, in the neighborhood."

[@jwait1496]

Chris Clark. Working for a family living on Encina, the man saw Laci walking McKenzie on Encina at least 5 times after October 15. He also saw the two of them in the park, and said one of the family members would talk to Laci when she waked McKenzie. He last saw Laci and McKenzie walking two weeks before Christmas. He said he knew it was Laci he had seen because on the night of the 24th he and the family he worked for on Encina brought coffee to the Peterson house.

[@jwait1496]

GERAGOS: Now, specifically the, you received, or you did an interview with somebody by the name of Chris Clark? BERTALOTTO: Yes, I did. GERAGOS: And you did that recently, I take it? BERTALOTTO: I think it was in June. GERAGOS: I'll do it either way you want. Want me to show you mine? Or just use yours? You got it. And when did you do this interview with Chris Clark? BERTALOTTO: On the 23rd of April, 04. It was a face-to-face interview. I had done a short phone interview prior to that. GERAGOS: Okay. Now, is it a fair statement that this gentleman called after reading this story in the Modesto Bee that prosecutors intended to present evidence Laci was not walking her dog during the two months preceding her going missing? BERTALOTTO: Yes. . . . BERTALOTTO: I think he called the DA's office and he was forwarded to my desk and I got a voice mail, returned his call, and he had mentioned he had seen Laci walking in the neighborhood. And I says Well, why don't we schedule an interview, and I went to his house. GERAGOS: Okay. And the reason that he called is because he said he read an article that MPD was intending to present evidence that Laci wasn't walking, right? DISTASO: Objection, your Honor. It's not relevant. JUDGE: I don't know why he called. I don't know how he can tell why this person called. GERAGOS: Because he told him. JUDGE: Well, that's different. GERAGOS: Isn't that what Clark told you? DISTASO: It's still, it's not relevant. I mean, GERAGOS: It's clearly DISTASO: I don't have a problem with the information. Get it out JUDGE: It's relevant to the extent if this is what started this call. There's calls, you said you had 10,000 tips, so you don't know who motivates people to call, but this person read about it in the newspaper, apparently, and he decided to call. GERAGOS: Is that, is that a fair statement that I just asked you? That he said - Well, n he said that he had read in the Modesto Bee the prosecutors intended to present evidence that Laci Peterson was not walking her dog within the two minutes, two months that preceded her going missing, correct? BERTALOTTO: That’s correct. GERAGOS: He also said that he worked, worked in the neighborhood and showed up at His boss's house in the morning where they loaded up supplies to go to work, correct? BERTALOTTO: Correct. GERAGOS: And he had said his boss, and he identified him, and his boss's wife lived on Encina near Covina, right? BERTALOTTO: Correct. GERAGOS: And they did residential construction? BERTALOTTO: That’s what he said. GERAGOS: And he said he saw Laci walking her dog on Encina approximately five times, correct? BERTALOTTO: Yes. GERAGOS: Okay. And at that point you said Halt, I want to talk to you in person, correct? BERTALOTTO: Yeah. GERAGOS: You wanted to follow-up on this because obviously this was something that had not been followed up on, at least by Modesto PD, correct? BERTALOTTO: Well, this was the first time he had ever made contact with anybody, so I doubt anybody had contacted him about this. GERAGOS: Okay. Well, it was also the first time that he was aware that somebody was going along with this theory that Laci had not walked in the last two months, right? DISTASO: Objection, your Honor. BERTALOTTO: Right. JUDGE: Sustained. DISTASO: No, it's argumentative and calling for facts JUDGE: I sustained the objection. GERAGOS: Just keep arguing. He said that, that when you went out to meet him, he said starting on October 15th he had seen Laci walking her dog approximately five times, right? BERTALOTTO: That’s correct. GERAGOS: And he said he would go outside the Williams's residence preparing to go to work sometime between 8:00 and 8:30 a.m. and she would be walking her dog, right? BERTALOTTO: Generally? GERAGOS: Second paragraph. BERTALOTTO: Right. GERAGOS: Okay. You asked, you then asked him where she was walking her dog, and he said eastbound on Encina Avenue, right? BERTALOTTO: That’s correct. GERAGOS: You asked had he ever seen her on Covena and he said he hadn't, right? BERTALOTTO: Right. GERAGOS: And you asked what kind of dog and he identified it as a Golden Retriever mix. He said it did not look like it was full blood, but the coat was a bit different, correct? BERTALOTTO: Correct. GERAGOS: And he said he thought he saw her walking her dog in the park near the neighborhood by the creek in October shortly after he went to work, right? BERTALOTTO: That’s correct. GERAGOS: Went to work for the Williamses, correct? BERTALOTTO: Correct. GERAGOS: Okay. And he said they had went into the park to use the restroom and had noticed her walking in the park, right? BERTALOTTO: That’s correct. GERAGOS: Okay. And he said there were three other times that he saw Laci walking by herself, correct? BERTALOTTO: Where are you reading from now? GERAGOS: Looks like the one, two, three, fourth paragraph up. BERTALOTTO: Yes. GERAGOS: Okay. And he said her dog, that Laci's dog would bark at the Williamses' dog. That's the name of his boss, right? BERTALOTTO: Yes. Carl Williams. GERAGOS: Right. And he said once when Richie, and was that his boss? BERTALOTTO: No, that's the boss's stepson. GERAGOS: Okay. Was outside, that he even talked to Laci as she passed by, right? BERTALOTTO: Correct. GERAGOS: Okay. And he said the last time that he saw Laci walk by the Williamses' residence was when? BERTALOTTO: Approximately two weeks before she went missing. GERAGOS: Is that, two weeks before Christmas, right? And he said he was doing some work, and he knew how to date this because, in terms of the timing because he knew that he was doing work on the Williamses' yard in preparation for a Christmas party that they were intending to throw the week before Christmas, correct? BERTALOTTO: That’s correct. GERAGOS: And he said there was nothing unusual about that other than he remembers it was just the last time he had seen her, which was two weeks before Christmas, right? BERTALOTTO: That’s what he said. GERAGOS: Okay. And he said specifically that he realized the woman he saw walking the dog was the missing Laci Peterson the night she went missing on Christmas Eve, right? BERTALOTTO: Um GERAGOS: You asked him how do you know that this woman that you saw with the dog was Laci Peterson, right? BERTALOTTO: Right. GERAGOS: Okay. You wanted to know if it was Laci or if it was the DA who had the dog or if it was somebody else who was walking a dog, right? BERTALOTTO: Correct. GERAGOS: And he said that the night that she went missing, Christmas Eve, he was at his boss's house for Christmas Eve, right? BERTALOTTO: Correct. GERAGOS: And they walked over to the Petersons' restaurant, the Petersons' residence with turkey sandwiches and coffee, right? BERTALOTTO: Right. GERAGOS: So he was actually over there at the location at the house, 523 Covena, on the, on the 24th? BERTALOTTO: That’s what he told me. GERAGOS: Okay. And he said that he also verified it when he began seeing her face on television and the newspapers, right? BERTALOTTO: That’s what he told me. GERAGOS: Okay. He didn't want to be a witness in this case or be fronted in the media, right? BERTALOTTO: That’s what he said. GERAGOS: Okay. And you prepared a report and turned this over sometime in April or May, correct? Looks like you prepared it in April and it was turned over to the defense sometime in May? BERTALOTTO: Well, I prepared it the date that I did the interview. When it was turned over, I have no knowledge. GERAGOS: Okay. When it was turned over to me you have no knowledge? BERTALOTTO: Right. I turned it in to the DA's office. GERAGOS: Okay. Then specifically I want to ask you about, did you do a re-canvass of the neighborhood at some point?

[@jwait1496]

Police ignored Harshman's tip. Tom Harshman, who lived in Modesto, saw something that really concerned him near the corner of Scenic Drive and Claus Road as he was driving with Elizabeth Harshman between 2 and 4 p.m. on the afternoon of December 24. He saw a young pregnant woman being forced into a van. After driving past this scene, Harshman was so upset that he turned around and went back to the spot hoping to find the van still there and hoping to get more information about the license plate number. GERAGOS: And they have witnessed the incident, and don't know if they have called Modesto PD yet or not, correct? GROGAN: Correct. GERAGOS: Okay. JUDGE: Does he say what time of the day that was? GERAGOS: This was at 10:08? GROGAN: That would be 10:08 a.m. GERAGOS: So, at this point, Mr. Harshman has called on the 28th at 6:50 said he saw a woman being forced into a van, gave a description of the van. Then approximately two months later a New York City police detective says, I have talked to, presumably, Harshman's wife who may have witnessed the incident, correct? GROGAN: Yes. He got the information from a friend of Miss Harshman's, Mr. Harshman's wife, I believe. GERAGOS: Okay. And specifically you contacted him on May 18th, 2004, correct? GROGAN: Yes. GERAGOS: And he, when you contacted him, he told you that the same day he called into the police department. You put it down at 12:28, right? GROGAN: Yes, based on that tip. GERAGOS: I don't think you ever saw this. I'm just going to show this to you. When I went through the tip lines, at 14789, it looks like somebody called in, but the name that was written down was Thomas Harsh. Do you see that? GROGAN: I see it. GERAGOS: Okay. You hadn't seen that before right now, had you? GROGAN: No. GERAGOS: Okay. It says, reporting that three or four days ago he saw a pregnant lady being pushed into a van. Caller given to Detective Holmes. You were not aware that Harsh had indicated that it was three or four days prior to the 28th when he had actually phoned in; isn't that correct? GROGAN: No, I don't think so. GERAGOS: Okay. This is the first time that you have seen that, because when the caller, whoever took down the information, they just wrote Harsh as opposed to Harshman, correct? GROGAN: Correct. GERAGOS: Okay. And he said that he, specifically, on the same day that he had called in, he had seen a van parked on the south side of Scenic, west of Claus, which he described as a 70s, American-made model, beige in color, correct? GROGAN: Is that the tip that you are reading from top? GERAGOS: No. I'm at 4527. GROGAN: Yes.

[@dogloverjb6873]

I'd like to know if SL, if he ever took a lie detector test. Scott mother is just protecting her son, but it's an insult to Lacy's family. SP is guilty hands down. He's a pathological lier. Look at his history of lies.

[@aok4418]

So, where's the evidence? Lying about an affair doesn't constitute as evidence. The MPD should have done their jobs. They refused follow the actual evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it. He was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round. There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. We even have the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explaining to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found. -Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. -Conner was found above the high tide line and water break. -The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear. -Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested. -The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years." -Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments. -Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.

[@daisydaisy1349]

I think laci left the house but not on foot and not alive .

[@GatCat]

Oh! They asked the burglars if they kidnapped Laci and they said no. So thats that. Wow.

[@SAVETHEKIDS-bn5zo]

Remember they were nice robbers at home eating dinner with their mothers like all nice crack heads

[@GatCat]

@@SAVETHEKIDS-bn5zo I knew it! I’m pretty sure Scott Peterson killed all the dinosaurs too!

[@billy6047]

So two crackhead burglars who were seen on the front lawn in broad daylight kippnapped and murdered a heavily pregnant woman because they were afraid of being IDENTIFIED! LMAO! Maybe if they were that concerned they would have robbed the house at night time!! But no, they apparently kippnapped Laci. Then waited patiently for a few days until Scott's alibi was released. Then they drove to the BIG BAY and some how knew where Scott went fishing. Then dumped her body within the tidal flows of that area. Genius burglars!! Took polygraphes and passed. The real murderer is Scott Peterson.

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

@@billy6047 yes, yes! Not only what you have stated, but, they also want us to believe that LE knew it was the burglars but gave them a pass because they didn't like poor Scotty. So, they helped the burglars frame Scott. Even changed the date of when the robbery occurred to help out the thugs who robbed the Medinas. They're insane!

[@loc5377]

I’m sure they did more than just ask. 🤦‍♀️

[@andreakarnas7670]

And the way he says Eiffel Tower with such phony affect. Who talks like that?

[@annem9402]

@ 0:31 Janey's deception. Remember what the Berkeley Marina was like on the 24th? You heard from the employees. Cold, chilly, hardly any activity. The marina manager: It was a slow day, nobody came to the office. Cold and cloudy. The, cold, windy, one of them said. Not busy at all. Gary Friedman, the guy who works at the bait shop, says no fishing trips were booked that day. December is a very slow month for fishing. Most fish are out of season. There was nobody there at the Berkeley Marina that day. Remember this receipt? This is from the 23rd to the 27th, only three tickets were sold. Three tickets that whole time. 23, 24, 25, 26, 27. Three tickets; one of which is sitting right here in court. Only two other people launched a boat from the Berkeley Marina during that whole period. Now, there was some I think attempt by the defense to make it seem like the Berkeley Marina is the most happening place on the planet. Well, it wasn't on that day. That's a proven fact.

[@sophie8394]

Excellent! Janey is a bigger liar than Scott at this point.

[@brennanhuff2960]

“There was no one at the Marina that day”. Seriously? PEOPLE LIVE ON BOATS THAT ARE DOCKED AT THAT MARINA. Talk about lies. 🤥

[@annem9402]

@@brennanhuff2960 That was brought up throughout the trial that people lived on their boats.

[@brennanhuff2960]

This is from Distaso’s closing argument. Of course he’s going to spin things for the jury. The launch tickets sold on those days don’t represent people who are actually around that area or frequent that area. They only tell us the people who were honest and purchased tickets to take their boats in the water.

[@annem9402]

@@brennanhuff2960 Remember what the Berkeley Marina was like on the 24th? You heard from the employees. Cold, chilly, hardly any activity. The marina manager: It was a slow day, nobody came to the office. Cold and cloudy. The, cold, windy, one of them said. Not busy at all. Gary Friedman, the guy who works at the bait shop, says no fishing trips were booked that day. December is a very slow month for fishing. Most fish are out of season. There was nobody there at the Berkeley Marina that day. Remember this receipt? This is from the 23rd to the 27th, only three tickets were sold. Three tickets that whole time. 23, 24, 25, 26, 27. Three tickets; one of which is sitting right here in court. Only two other people launched a boat from the Berkeley Marina during that whole period. Now, there was some I think attempt by the defense to make it seem like the Berkeley Marina is the most happening place on the planet. Well, it wasn't on that day. That's a proven fact.

[@StarSurvivor1585]

Turns out there is more than 1 pregnant woman in the neighborhood...smh.

[@admiralkrankandhismightyba158]

Okay, but we're talking about reasonable doubt.

[@brennanhuff2960]

But yet the MPD couldn’t find the supposed Laci lookalike that walked that morning on La Loma Avenue with a dog that looked like McKenzi. And they tried reallllllllly hard to find such a woman…

[@pauldawson6138]

Tip to criminal suspects: get a lawyer, never talk to the press or media. Everything is held against you.

[@redwingsfan3621]

Exactly! And never talk to cops.. ever!!

[@bsrk3170]

Janey thinks she has all the answers. Why didn’t anyone ask her about his behavior? His girlfriend?

[@rustyscrib6071]

This is such B.S!! Those ppl that said they saw the dog and Laci never even knew Laci. How do you recognize a person you don't even know. There were other women that were pregnant walking their dog/golden retriever. And they said she was wearing something completely different than what she was found dead in. If these people were creditable, you know darn well Mark Geragos would have brought them in to testify in court. He didn't do that, did he?? He didn't call anyone because he knew they weren't credible!! This is so stupid to even bring up.

[@jwait1496]

You're lying again Sophie. Over a dozen witnesses had described Laci even down to the breed of her dog on the 24th. You Said police found a woman that walked that day that resembled Laci and had a similar breed of dog. That's false! Here are the people interviewed. Elizabeth Guptill, pregnant walker with son in jogging stroller, no dog, didn’t walk in December Janet Kenworthy, Park walker with white Huskie mix (she didn’t testify), worked on 24th, thinks husband walked the dog that day Jill Lear, pregnant walker with Australian Shepherd, didn’t walk 24th Joan Lee, pregnant walker with chocolate Lab and Husband, didn’t walk 24th Melba Martinez, La Loma walker with 2 Golden Retrievers, didn’t remember if she walked 24th Dianne Merenda, blond, not pregnant, Park walker with Golden Retriever, didn’t walk 24th Patricia Mewhinney, long blonde hair, Park walker w/German Shepherd/Black Lab mix, drove and then walked on 24th east from Phoenix Amy Neumann, pregnant walker with apricot standard Poodle, not walking in December Jordan Visola-Prescott, pregnant neighborhood walker with black/white Border Collie/Lab mix and Red Flyer red wagon with daughter in it, 99% sure she didn’t walk on the 24th Kim Westphal, not pregnant, long brown hair, neighborhood walker with Golden Retriever and a friend, 14766 : Kim Westfall (Westphal); she was walking with a friend on 12-24 at 11:30 Michelle Dean (Merced Co. DA, Laci look-alike with Golden Retriever named McKenzie), did not walk on December 24

[@jwait1496]

Grogan excuses the MPD failure to follow up on tips by citing Karen Servas’ 10:18 timeline for finding McK. Even if Karen Servas’ timeline were accurate, which it is not, MPD did not have information about her reinvented timeline until January 3. The detectives did nothing to confirm that her time source was valid. Grogan also says tips were not followed up because phone records indicate that Scott was still in his neighborhood at 10:08. This theory did not take shape until shortly before trial. Two prosecution witnesses stated that cell phone records were not designed to be used to identify location. Grogan also uses the excuse that tips were not investigated because witnesses reported Laci wearing black pants and her body was found wearing tan pants. MPD did not have this information until mid-April when Laci’s body was found. Then Grogan indicates that sightings outside of the park were discounted because Laci was planning to walk in the park. This is blatantly false and Grogan knew it. Grogan had been present on December 26 when Chris Boyer interviewed Scott Peterson at his home. Scott clearly stated that Laci sometimes walked in the neighborhood. He told Boyer, in Grogan’s presence that Laci had walked on Sunday, December 22, in the neighborhood.

[@laneybobs8157]

@@jwait1496 what are you, DRUNK?? For the millionth time - IT WAS NOT LACI WALKING THE DOG! IT WAS NOT LACI! REPEAT after me - IT WAS NOT LACI! Got it? Good! Talk to me when you sober UPPPP!!!!

[@jwait1496]

@@laneybobs8157Who was it? Here are the people interviewed. Elizabeth Guptill, pregnant walker with son in jogging stroller, no dog, didn’t walk in December Janet Kenworthy, Park walker with white Huskie mix (she didn’t testify), worked on 24th, thinks husband walked the dog that day Jill Lear, pregnant walker with Australian Shepherd, didn’t walk 24th Joan Lee, pregnant walker with chocolate Lab and Husband, didn’t walk 24th Melba Martinez, La Loma walker with 2 Golden Retrievers, didn’t remember if she walked 24th Dianne Merenda, blond, not pregnant, Park walker with Golden Retriever, didn’t walk 24th Patricia Mewhinney, long blonde hair, Park walker w/German Shepherd/Black Lab mix, drove and then walked on 24th east from Phoenix Amy Neumann, pregnant walker with apricot standard Poodle, not walking in December Jordan Visola-Prescott, pregnant neighborhood walker with black/white Border Collie/Lab mix and Red Flyer red wagon with daughter in it, 99% sure she didn’t walk on the 24th Kim Westphal, not pregnant, long brown hair, neighborhood walker with Golden Retriever and a friend, 14766 : Kim Westfall (Westphal); she was walking with a friend on 12-24 at 11:30 Michelle Dean (Merced Co. DA, Laci look-alike with Golden Retriever named McKenzie), did not walk on December 24

[@jwait1496]

@@laneybobs8157 Are you delayed Rusty's crib? Yes you are the same person and we both already know that.

[@kathywedzik4905]

1) After sp left to go fishing, lp came across a robbery got abducted , the robber killed lp held lp body till the robber found out the location where lp husband sp had been , then, disposed lp dead body in the exact spot sp had been to set sp up. 2) sp was being stalked by a malignant narcissist and when sp left to go fishing, sp's malignant narcissist killed lp, sp's malignant narcissist using its own boat, followed shadowed sp and dumped lp body where they saw sp had gone to perpetuate sp guilt. Lol

[@Wolfiebadass]

🤣🤣

[@wineasy9002]

So Scott said to Amber his wife had been dead and to Laci that he is cheating. Wtf Scott deserves to be free when he is 200 years old.

[@luckynorm100]

His family must have a lot of money his dad will do anything to get him out of jail

[@VideoFanatic02]

They will probably go broke trying to get him out of jail.

[@MakeupMobster]

That interview was so creepy. The witnesses that supposedly saw Lacey after Scott was already fishing, did any of them actually know Lacey?

[@nitagirl614]

No, they didn't know Laci. That's why it's easy for them to misidentify.

[@annem9402]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/aIWshGmgdsh4f7s 3:50

[@aok4418]

@@nitagirl614 Grogan also says tips were not followed up because phone records indicate that Scott was still in his neighborhood at 10:08. This theory did not take shape until shortly before trial. Two prosecution witnesses stated that cell phone records were not designed to be used to identify location. Grogan also uses the excuse that tips were not investigated because witnesses reported Laci wearing black pants and her body was found wearing tan pants. MPD did not have this information until mid-April when Laci’s body was found. Then Grogan indicates that sightings outside of the park were discounted because Laci was planning to walk in the park. This is blatantly false and Grogan knew it. Grogan had been present on December 26 when Chris Boyer interviewed Scott Peterson at his home. Scott clearly stated that Laci sometimes walked in the neighborhood. He told Boyer, in Grogan’s presence that Laci had walked on Sunday, December 22, in the neighborhood. At the time these sightings were coming in, MPD still believed that Scott had left home around 9:30 a.m. and that Karen Servas had found McK around 10:30 a.m. Each and every one of these sightings should have been investigated thoroughly. MPD’s failure to do so is inexcusable.

[@aok4418]

@@annem9402 Renee, Sophie, Twills Reneenay FabNayNay, Jay Taylor Ginger Clove, VideoFanatic02 Rustys crib, Pan Rules all Chee chalker, Tippy Canoe. Mia Gardner, Laney Bobs, Anne M Trailrunner925.

[@VideoFanatic02]

@@aok4418 Shut up Scott

[@nancymcdermott5795]

Scott was/is a SELISH person.

[@zanecarano8185]

This lady Janey is so out of touch with reality.

[@sophie8394]

🎯

[@yogabee2222]

Robbers kill pregnant women on Christmas? He had more motivation and already told the mistress that she was "gone" all these other theories investigated. Let her rest in peace and let him do the time for his crime!!

[@aok4418]

That's not proof he killed her. And the State could not determine a motive. They conceded Amber was NOT a motive and neither was money. No the other theories were NOT investigated. Read the trial records. The MPD let Todd and Pearce basically walk even though they knew they had something to do with her disappearance. It's disgusting, read the facts.

[@VideoFanatic02]

@@aok4418 Bullshit.

[@ritaeichler2066]

11:40 am that mornimg? Laci was already dead!!

[@sarahkhan443]

Was gone girl based on this? xD

[@betterthanyourname2391]

Yea

[@k21schmi]

"The only thing we couldn't eliminate was Scott" But just minutes earlier admitted to finding burglars who confessed to robbing her neighbor's home. but they said they didn't do it so let's not investigate them any further. I mean that's just sloppy detective work.

[@nitagirl614]

They took a polygraph and passed. They also looked in the vehicle and found no evidence of Laci being there.

[@sophie8394]

They were able to eliminate the burglars. They cooperated, unlike Scott. Took and passed polygraphs. The burglary happened on the 26th. Already proven.

[@nathana2215]

It was more thorough than their word. Ridiculous.

[@nickirito3435]

I want to say from personal experience. I used to be very shy never wanted to be on TV or anything like that. But when I was fighting my case, and the press came and wanted an interview, and to talk about my case, I didnt want to speak to anyone, I didnt trust them. Then an authority figure told me, if I want people to listen to my case then I better swallow whatever anxiety I had about talking with the press. She said just be honest, and brave and talk about your case, and its OK to be emotional, because I was afraid of crying in front of people. I changed my whole life that day. If going on camara and talking about my case, could save my loved one, then who cares about my problems! with anxiety or whatever. I did the interview. Was honest, and emotional and intelligent. That press release wound up helping my case a lot because people could see how genuine I was and people called their representatives to do something about it, and I won the case in the end. Now I'm not shy anymore, and I would go to the press for help, its an important process of solving a case.

[@nathana2215]

People do get in front of the camera unless you got a girl on the side you're afraid will see you.

[@jackieclark9679]

Guilty

[@kimmilliner7300]

No remorse

[@rubydawn1]

why did he not just divorce her.

[@dianemardis8964]

Sister visit your brother and accept it. Prayers for laci Conner and Sharon Rocha!

[@judimiles3522]

He went fishing in the Bay. She was found in the bay. He had a secret boat, a secret girlfriend, he told a bunch of lies. How anyone could believe this guy is innocent is beyond me.

[@nathana2215]

Yeah it's beyond me.

[@jwait1496]

The boat was not a secret. Laci knew about the boat. "Scott had told the police that Laci knew about the boat and that she had been to the warehouse on December 20, 2002. Detective Brocchini was told about an eye witness who confirmed seeing Laci at the warehouse (where the boat was stored). When he heard about this witness in August of 2003, he purposely left it out of his police report. While under oath during the trial, he admitted to excising the information from his police report and acknowledged that he did not think it had been reported by any other officer. This woman later confirmed that Laci was at the warehouse on December 20, 2002. This situation confirmed that Scott was once again being truthful. It was Detective Brocchini who had been deceptive. Guy Miligi told police on January 4, 2003 that he and Scott had discussed purchasing a ski boat together prior to December. Jodi Miligi told police that Scott discussing a boat one to three weeks prior to Thanksgiving. Brian Ulrich told detectives on January 4, 2003 that Scott had been discussing buying a boat for over three months. Scott withdrew the $1400 from his joint checking account with Laci. Also, Scott did not try to hide his identity from Bruce or the DMV. Scott gave accurate information to Bruce including his home address. This information was filed with the DMV on 12-9-02. Another boat Scott looked at on December 8th was not registered with the DMV, so Scott decided not to purchase it. It was also the sellers request that Scott pay cash. Who specifically looks for and buys a registered boat to keep a boat a secret? BOAT REGISTRATION GERAGOS: But he also told you, I don't know, was it in that conversation or another one, that specifically it had been registered for a long time? Do you remember him telling you that in one of the conversations? GROGAN: I remember we talked about registration and, with another boat that he had looked at. GERAGOS: And that boat was not registered and he didn't want an unregistered boat, correct? GROGAN: Correct. And I - GERAGOS: Did you find that, did you find that to be a, a little bit at odds with this theory that he was trying to hide the boat? And that he was actually buying a boat or he wanted a boat that had been registered? GROGAN: Well, not necessarily. I don't think that if, if he got stopped for a violation of an unregistered vehicle or boat while enroute to the Bay, maybe that wouldn't be good. GERAGOS: Well, did he put his name down, we've got these DMV documents that were marked as People's Exhibit 263; is that correct? These were marked by Ms. Fladager. GROGAN: Yes. There's a release of liability completed. GERAGOS: Okay. And specifically these documents show that that boat's been registered for a while, correct? GROGAN: Yes. It appears so. GERAGOS: Okay. And specifically these documents show that Scott Peterson's name is registered with the DMV as the buyer of the boat; isn't that right? GROGAN: That’s correct. GERAGOS: Okay. So, and that receipt date was on December 17th; is that right? GROGAN: I'm not sure. I'm sorry, I didn't look at that. GERAGOS: Okay. When you talked to Bruce Peterson, you did interview Bruce Peterson, didn't you? GROGAN: Yes. He was interviewed several times, I think. GERAGOS: Okay. He told you that he, that he had filled out a release of liability, correct? GROGAN: I don't know if he told me that, but I believe that's in one of the reports, at least. GERAGOS: Okay. And specifically the DMV documents show Scott Peterson, his address, correct? And the transfer date as 12/9; is that right? GROGAN: Yes. GERAGOS: Okay. And specifically the release of liability is also a document that is filed with the DMV, to the best of your knowledge? GROGAN: The release of liability? GERAGOS: Release of liability. GROGAN: Yes.

[@nathana2215]

@@jwait1496 Plz stop with your lies Amber Heard.

[@nathana2215]

AOK has Amber Heard disease.

[@jwait1496]

@@nathana2215 What does Amber Heard have to do with this case. 🤔

[@basiahellwich3505]

his sister in law lives on another planet, why does she not investigate Scott herself, if she's so convinced, he is innocent? Why not put in the same effort looking into Scott's possible guilt, as she did on the burglars, who she thinks are responsible for Laci's murder? I was a victim of crime myself, I could not believe how some, close family members will come up with in order to convince themselves someone else is responsible, no matter what evidence you put in front of them! Total denial, it is mind boggling, how some live in an alternate universe.

[@Lightworkers.]

If she was 8 months pregnant she wouldn't be walking a dog for hours. Anyone who has been pregnant knows that.

[@khalida02]

I don’t get how his sister-in-law thinks that what she is saying anything that makes sense??? Nothing she is saying has any weight. What could he be telling her that she is putting all this effort in on his behalf???

[@aok4418]

Be specific. I'll be more than happy to explain.

[@VideoFanatic02]

@@aok4418 GFY, Scott.

[@Phyllyps-Levine]

I do not believe him.

[@aok4418]

You don't vave to. There's no evidence proving he did it, period! Lots of exonerating evidence and reasonable doubt though.

[@arrivagabry]

you don't kill a pregnant wife for a woman you met 2 weeks in total prior.

[@sophie8394]

He met Amber more than a month before he murdered Laci. Laci's fate was sealed the moment she got pregnant. He would have killed her with or without Amber Frey. Chris Watts met his gf about 6 wks before he murdered his entire family. So ya. It definitely does happen.

[@jeandixson5610]

Laci was found in the same clothing she had on the night before, Scott murdered her the night before and disposed of her body. He went back to set the stage in the home, in the wear house, and in the marina. He didn’t want to be caught with a body in the light of day.

[@FreedominLove711]

I agree

[@petelikedporn6009]

She didn't see anything. She waited days to report it.

[@cl9824]

You have pull all the weeds out, then what's left is the truth. Scott Peterson is guilty. It was proven later that that this person who saw Lacy walking the dog was wrong. It was someone else. Who is to say Scott let the dog out with leash on when he killed Lacy to set all of this up. I wouldn't put it past him.

[@jwait1496]

Than who was it? -LOOK ALIKES JORDAN VISOLA-PRESCOTT Jodan Visola-Prescott lives on the same street as the Petersons and testified that in late December 2002, she was 4 1/2 months pregnant with twins and frequently walked her border collie- Labrador mix at La Loma Park. Her photo showed her holding her swollen belly with her brown hair falling on her shoulders like Laci.On cross-examination, she acknowledged that she usually pulled her daughter in a red wagon during walks. ELIZABETH GUPTILL Guptill lives near the Petersons and was five months pregnant in late December 2002. She does not have a dog but often walked in the neighborhood around that time. JILL LEAR Lear lives near the Petersons and was 6 1/2 to 7 months pregnant in late December 2002. Photos were shown of her posed in black tights like the ones Laci Peterson often wore walking. She often walked her dog in the neighborhood and at La Loma Park around that time but does not think she went on a walk on Dec. 24. *********** During his cross-examinations, Geragos pointed out that the women were hardly carbon copies of Laci in either habits or appearance. He noted that Lear's dog was a small Australian Shepherd with a black-and-white coat drastically different from Mackenzie's blond coat. Bisola-Brescott's black-and-white spotted border collie and Labrador retriever mix also scarcely resembled Mackenzie.

[@VideoFanatic02]

@@jwait1496 Shut up, Scott.

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

@@jwait1496 you just don't give up. No matter how loco your words make you appear. You must be a glutton for embarrassment.

[@redwingsfan3621]

There’s zero evidence against him. Zilch!

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

@@redwingsfan3621 the jury didn't spend almost nine months listening to nothing. Get a grip.

[@marlimarlirni]

The hair on his pliers is the evidence

[@ashleyvalentine2790]

Why didn't Scott Peterson not get the death penalty??? He is not welcome in this world!!

[@lina_binaa]

He did & they took it back. Gave him life instead. Do your research before posting stupid comments.

[@patriciabeecher72]

He did get the death penalty,but the judge made a mistake in jury instructions,so it had to be life in prison.

[@sistermaryfrances4480]

Are you all dragged in this s*** out again, he's guilty and you know it

[@aok4418]

America's Most wanted tip. Caller said he had a conversation with two men who were bragging about Laci’s murder. The first man was named. The second man was unnamed, but the tipster gave a description and knew where the second individual lived. It was reported “when they did it they thought it was going to be just another murder case . . . now it’s a big case all over TV and news . . . and they are blaming the husband and they are not getting any attention.” Caller went on to say that he knew John Doe lived with his mother; his mother has the same last name. The last name is worth mentioning because four days earlier, the Modesto Police had encountered Mother Doe. She was present at her neighbor’s home when police came looking for the Medina’s stolen property. There was a strong connection between the Doe family and burglar Steven Todd. Certainly, this would merit follow-up, especially since the AMW operator stated this caller was 100% sure. Unfortunately, the extent of their follow up was this: This tip was given to a Modesto police officer - the same officer that encountered Mother Doe four days earlier. This officer drove to John Doe’s house - which was one block away from where he had encountered Mother Doe four days earlier. John Doe was standing outside. The officer confirmed his identity and asked where he was on December 24th. John Doe said he was “locked up.” The officer called the jail and a deputy confirmed that John Doe had been in jail on the 24th, so the officer did not ask any other questions. Not one. But notice the tip did not say John Doe had murdered Laci, the tip just said “they did it.” It is not clear at all who “they” are. However, the officer asked no more questions of John Doe. The officer never asked John Doe why it would be reported that he was bragging about the murder of Laci Peterson; whether he knew anything about Laci’s whereabouts; or about his mother’s connection to the Medina burglary. It was later found that HE WAS NOT IN JAIL during December of 2002.

[@sophie8394]

Wow! 2 months and no reaction. And you think people pay attention to the garbage you post 😂😂😂

[@aok4418]

@sophie8394 AMW -----MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT. #CN-142591 ---This I what I told you Verbatim from the other thread. You asked... Documented by who? I told you the tip was logged after the show aired? Then handled by an officer from the MPD. Modesto Police Department supplemental report, CN#02- 142591. What is it you don't understand, Ang?....... ----Deputy from Stanislaus County Sheriff Department was asked to follow up on the tip on 01/07/03 regarding the tip filed to AMW tip line 01/06/03. The man was located and lied about being locked up on the 24th. The The deputy that said he had confirmed he was in jail had used an intake document that only estimates an inmate’s jail stay, it was not updated once he was released. So he was not in jail. They have the names of both individuals, genius. The tip even indicated he knew where the first man lived. We already know who that is. He and the mother were tracked down. They MPD just didn't do anything about it. Must be just a coincidence that Steven Todd's name came up again huh... a direct connection to the Medina burglary and the "Doe" family named, and where many of the stolen goods were located. Talking about how stupid everyone was for blaming the husband. He was right about that. The police were definitely stupid and completely incompetent. AMW Modesto California. Fugitive. Laci Peterson Operator. Tony. Date 1-6-03 Time. 9:36 PM ......Tattoos, drugs, drank and always carried a .38........ SOPHIE riiight J We're not the ones posting garbage about "unnamed" people, "Mother Doe" "Mr. R" "Citizen Q" and countless witnesses' who don't exist. That would be YOU Kathryn. Me No, Ang. It isn't garbage. It's documented, like I explained. I'm sorry you had so much trouble understanding as usual. And unnamed means they didn't name the person publicly due to the investigation.

[@aok4418]

@sophie8394 Speaking of garbage. Tell me, how could Geragos use the Aponte tip during trial if the defense wasn't aware of it, genius? Grogan only refers to the notation for January 22, 2003 where Aponte was asked to verify. It only includes Aponte’s phone number, where he worked, the names of the Shawn and Adam Tenbrink. It did NOT mention Steven Todd or Laci. You would know that if you bothered to research this instead posting this. To quote you " Mark Geragos is a highly skilled attorney. He didn't use the Aponte tip bc he knew it was bogus. Multi level hearsay. " QUOTE " there's nothing I haven't reviewed. I've been reviewing it for more than 10 years. I'm not impressed by KZbin legal experts. And for the 2nd time. RN did NOT co author a book. The fact you don't even know that tells me everything I need to know about your expertise. " FACT RN did co author a book called 'we, the jury' QUOTE ("Are you aware the boat was never registered") FACT The boat WAS registered. The correct information including his name and address was filed with the DMV on 12-9-02. QUOTE ("Even though Ron already had a boat and a better one at that.... LOL") FACT Ron didn't have a boat. He had a float tube. QUOTE (...you don't have an explanation for why SP refused to even speak to John Walsh...") FACT He did speak to John walsh. Get your facts straight, stalker! John Walsh: "I talked to Scott on the phone for about 45 minutes and his parents for about an hour," Walsh said in the lobby of the DoubleTree Hotel. " -You said Scott did not have an anchor rope, FALSE. I even gave you the exhibit number. QUOTE "None if the so called witnesses knew Laci." TRUTH Martha Aguilar: Around 10 a.m. on the morning of December 24, Aguilar saw Laci and McK walking on La Loma Avenue in the same general area that Freitas saw her. She was sure it was Laci. Aguilar lived 2 blocks south of Laci on Covena and they went to the same doctor. Aguilar’s call to the MPD tipline was never returned. She was never interviewed by anyone from MPD or from the DA’s office. QUOTE "They also claim to have seen her in an area where she was never known to walk." TRUTH Grogan indicates that sightings outside of the park were discounted because Laci was planning to walk in the park. This is blatantly false and Grogan knew it. Grogan had been present on December 26 when Chris Boyer interviewed Scott Peterson at his home. Scott clearly stated that Laci sometimes walked in the neighborhood. He told Boyer, in Grogan’s presence that Laci had walked on Sunday, December 22, in the neighborhood. -Tabitha K and Patty S both insist Jackie must have been lying because she would have had to fill out a CTR form to withdraw the $10,000. Anyone can look it up and see that a CTR form is not filed for a single transaction of $10,000. "Federal law requires financial institutions to report currency (cash or coin) transactions OVER $10,000 conducted by, or on behalf of, one person, as well as multiple currency transactions that aggregate to be OVER $10,000 in a single day. These transactions are reported on Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs)."

[@BrookelLakeKC]

So many deaths connected to this case. Laci’s dad & stepdad. Those men likely did of broken hearts. And Scott wants a damn appeal?!

[@mykonos4393]

The "burglars talked about the abduction and said their hands were clean on that" ??? And cop chuckles. Just can't trust this cop.

[@OctPSfever]

He killed her,,,Who is the old lady saying that she saw something else? Its Scott...

[@sophie8394]

Diane Jackson. A neighbor who claims to have seen 3 short, dark-skinned men (who have never been identified almost 20 yrs later) infront of the Medina home on the 24th...but waited 3 days to report it to police 🙄

[@nathana2215]

@@sophie8394 There were two vans on the street on the 24th right?

[@sophie8394]

@@nathana2215 no one reported 2 vans. There was one van that was a work vehicle that belonged to neighbor Amie Krigbaum and it was parked on the street all day.

[@nathana2215]

@@sophie8394 It could have been the work van that the lady saw the three dark skinned males right or no?

[@sophie8394]

@@nathana2215 yes. It had to be or she would have seen 2 vans. Funny, she waited 3 days to report this and the 3 short, dark-skinned men have never been located.

[@darcyswanson7287]

He plays innocent very well. But he smells bad

[@FreedominLove711]

One thing unknown; when & how he did it. I believe his alibis tripped him up

[@sabrinamiddlebrooks5674]

The police didn’t even investigate any witness statements or even take them seriously. The only thing they investigated was Scott even before amber frey came into the story.

[@sabrinamiddlebrooks5674]

No I’m not saying he’s innocent I’m just saying it was investigated properly

[@sophie8394]

How would you know anything about the investigation and how it was handled? There were over 90 LE agencies that participated in this investigation including the FBI and the DOJ.

[@nitagirl614]

They investigated sex offenders and those convicted of assault around the areas. They also investigated Laci's family members.

[@PrairieeGirl]

Why is Scott even still alive? How is he sentenced to death and then gets to live for years and get a redo? The guy is a psychopath.

[@Kimmiecat-yx2sd]

Killing your wife defies logic, but doesn't mean it doesn't happen, he OBVIOUSLY dumped her body but that lady is in denial.

[@aok4418]

I fail to see what's obvious. Her body was found nearly 4 months later. His alibi was public and there isn't a shred of evidence proving he put her where she was found. Medical examiner currents GERAGOS: Okay. Now, when you talked to Boyd Stephens, he also told you and he was the San Francisco, or still is the San Francisco Medical Examiner. He told you that in cases previously where bodies have bloated with decomposition, that they pulled as much as eighty pounds of weight up with the body surfacing in the Bay, correct? GROGAN: Yes. GERAGOS: Okay. And, once again, you gave him, and this would have been on April 2nd, of 2003. You gave him the hypothetical of the chicken wire, right? GROGAN: Yes, sir. GERAGOS: Okay. And he told you that the water flow southbound was at four knots, right? GROGAN: In one particular area we were talking about, yes. GERAGOS: Okay. And he also said that, in his opinion, thirty pound of weights would not likely be enough to cause a female of that weight, especially wrapped in plastic causing additional buoyancy in the plastic to immediately go to the bottom, correct? GROGAN: Yes, that's one of the things he said. GERAGOS: And he said victim would likely have traveled with the currents for a considerable distance before any exposed weights could catch something on the bottom, or the current would allow the object to stay in one place long enough for the weights to begin to sink in the mud. GROGAN: Yes. When talking about the Richmond Turning Basin area, there. GERAGOS: If it had made it to deeper waters, it's possible the body would still be in pristine condition, right? GROGAN: Yes, sir. GERAGOS: Thank you. I have no further questions.

[@billy6047]

@@aok4418 Where's all the missing anchors your Scotty boy made??

[@berniceanaya6709]

I couldn't figure out is that why Scotts' brother was not with his wife backing up his own brother, but Scotts' sister-in-law is really determined to believe Scott is innocent. She's determined to get him released from prison, believing he's innocent but his brother is not seen on camera proving his brothers innocence. I find that to be very strange, cause you see a lot of her and not him. I wonder if he was involved or knows more what his brother did and is keeping his mouth shut also out of sight, out of mind. If he does know or is involved he's just as guilty as his brother Scott. His sister-in-law is totally believes Scott is innocent, either She's really dense or he convinced her that he's innocent or she knows more than what she's saying. I just found it really bizarre on how that family was acting. It reminds me of that family of Casey Anthony. Hopefully the truth will be revealed about his brother and sister-in-laws actions on wether or not they're guilty just like Scott is.

[@LivingOnaPrayer123]

Scott was probably having an affair with the sister in law too..thats why shes so defensive of him. Amber probably wasn't the only woman he had on the side..

[@khalida02]

So then they just happened to dump her body in the bay exactly where he went fishing?

[@Kittycattnatt]

First of all, Why would they believe people who were robbing?

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

They passed two polygraphs. Scott refused to take one.

[@patriciagazey4693]

Evil

[@user-yg6xf5vz3z]

He's sister in law is nuts.😢

[@janalynneshannon5195]

Right? Gossip I read is Mrs. Janey Peterson, Esquire was having a shall we say an inappropriate relationship with her Bro in Law for some time prior to the murders . Laci suspected from her Sis in laws distinctive perfume .Word is Laci was going to expose the affair to John, Scott's Brother. Scott killed her to keep the secret from getting out.Amber Frey was just collateral damage.His phone calls to her say it all .He is not even trying to sneak to see her.Why ? Cause sis in law/ Lover was sitting at his dinner table Christmas night and has since been his biggest supporter.Becoming a Lawyer and all the perks to privacy to have conjugal I mean, business visits. Makes alot of sense when that is placed on why Janey Peterson, Esquire is working so hard to get her murdering Bro in law / prison lover released.

[@sappermade6012]

Why would Scott leave his dog out??? This is odd

[@judysanchez6329]

Oj, Simpson and..... Scot Peterson did the Same thing ?

[@VideoFanatic02]

Yup

[@77tinaja]

Sister in law has a crush on him that's why she's doing all this. He is guilty no doubt so let's move on

[@karencarpenter5845]

She is just Anothwr Narcissistic sociopaths riding the fame wave all the way.

[@aok4418]

Plenty of doubt. I doubt you know much about the case if you belive otherwise.

[@mamas-jeep1984]

@@aok4418 Aliens are climbing out of your nether regions too

[@yungdcwa81]

NO ONE KNOWS WHAT REALLY HAPPENED , WE KNOW THE POLICE WILL GO AFTER WHO EVER IS EASIER TO CONVICT

[@gwilburn5271]

His wife did not had a chance why is these people wasting time in this bullshit

[@blue3381]

6:27 Why was he telling his mistress that he was at the Eifel Tower? New Years? Why did she know to record it?