Fascinating content. With regard to Part 3, it seems the author indicates a strong connection between Bolshevism and Judaism. I’ve recently heard historian Mike Duncan of the Revolutions podcast reject this idea categorically calling it in effect untrue and antisemitic. His treatment of the Russian Revolution is an amazing retelling and he seems authoritative. It seems like this is an important claim to clear up even today, and that someone ought to be able to chase it to ground with facts. In any case, thanks for all your good work. I’m learning a ton.
@StephenHeiner6 ай бұрын
The connection is stated by Zionists themselves and is documented in photos and manifestos! More on this in 2025. This year I have to continue to cover many aspects to this issue.
@StephenHeiner6 ай бұрын
Remember that anytime someone wants to shut down investigation or discussion a telltale sign of dishonesty is calling it “antisemitic.” Facts have no ideology. Truth is not afraid of sunshine. If the claims are false they will be proven so. In the meantime the name calling indicates insecurity.
@hanihani86126 ай бұрын
Thank you, your channel is educational.
@StephenHeiner6 ай бұрын
I appreciate that. Just trying to learn about all this myself!
@Offa7a6 ай бұрын
Great review.
@StephenHeiner6 ай бұрын
Thank you
@KeithBrighouse-m4g3 ай бұрын
Again, fine work in reviewing and presentation.
@StephenHeiner3 ай бұрын
Thank you
@ramseypietronasser25 ай бұрын
One thing to bear in mind is that selling land is like cashing in on a pension. You buy when you're young. The land goes up in value. You sell when you're old It's the same in Persia but with carpets, for example
@Lioninthenight6 ай бұрын
Excellent book. I'll have to reread it because I forgot a good deal of the granular parts of the book. But because of you, you provided me with a great review and summary of what I have forgotten. Thanks again, Stephen! I find a great amount of use from your fantastic reviews!
@StephenHeiner6 ай бұрын
I’m glad! ;)
@EgyptNewFascistRev6 ай бұрын
Please accept my Super Thanks as a token for my appreciation, have a great day
@StephenHeiner6 ай бұрын
Thanks again.
@francisheperi41806 ай бұрын
I look upon this conflict in the Holy Land as a curse from God on both their houses until Heaven intervenes, when the hand of God can no longer be restrained.
@StephenHeiner6 ай бұрын
Well the “both their houses” would imply this is some 50/50 thing when the aggression and criminality and lawlessness is 90% on one side.
@francisheperi41806 ай бұрын
@@StephenHeiner God of the Jews (a cursed race, anyway) versus the God of the Palestinians (who are Muslims)? And yes, the percentages are lopsided and we all know why that is, in this geopolitical landscape.
@Offa7a6 ай бұрын
But Only 5.9% of the land was sold. 50% of that 5.9% was bought from non Palestinian absentee landlords In 1930 selling land was completely discouraged.
@StephenHeiner6 ай бұрын
Yes but unfortunately it still happened, particularly among the wealthy elites.
@xaviercrain73364 күн бұрын
It was absentee landlords who sold…not Arabs in general
@StephenHeiner4 күн бұрын
It was both. In any case, people are allowed to sell their land.
@xaviercrain73364 күн бұрын
@ not if they are selling it knowing what is being done…and it shows class prejudice
@StephenHeiner4 күн бұрын
@@xaviercrain7336 this is a silly argument. People are allowed to sell their land to whomever they want to. There are more powerful arguments to be made than "these people prejudicially sold their own land."
@xaviercrain73364 күн бұрын
@ go and look at the sursok family who sold land…no it is not a silly argument. You still have so much to learn about how Zionism operates. They were not singularly invested households buying.
@StephenHeiner4 күн бұрын
@@xaviercrain7336 I didn't say Zionism wasn't crafty, nor did I say that everyone who bought or sold were virtuous, I'm saying that it's silly to say that people are not allowed to sell their lands. People get tricked about who or how they sell their lands all the time. This is not some new thing in human history. A much stronger argument, regarding the land, is that the British Mandate had no legal basis. That brings into question the 1947 partition resolution and the entire premise from which Israel declared independence. But hey, if you want to pursue this, please feel free.