Optics: Two-beam interference - collimated beams | MIT Video Demonstrations in Lasers and Optics

  Рет қаралды 33,926

MIT OpenCourseWare

MIT OpenCourseWare

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 19
@stb1820
@stb1820 11 жыл бұрын
Excellent. I was wondering what the interference would look like, & this video demonstrated it perfectly.
@ParsaIQT-lk4um
@ParsaIQT-lk4um 2 жыл бұрын
I have looked around youtube and have yet to see another video that gets complete destructive interference with their interferometer like this, this setup is either really good or its more to do with skill
@sandrooliveira334
@sandrooliveira334 2 жыл бұрын
Great....thank you teacher!!!
@1234ToddgMr
@1234ToddgMr 11 жыл бұрын
How long can you keep it totally blacked out (total interference)?
@HDsharp
@HDsharp 8 жыл бұрын
Can a laser beam interfere with another laser beam if they meet head on? or at an adjacent angle?
@MC-wg3fm
@MC-wg3fm 2 жыл бұрын
Two laser lights, cross hair and different frequency(color) so that a green laser light is perpendicular to a red laser with a hair in the center of the intersecting lights? My guess is the light frequency difference isn’t going to affect anything with similar results in the crosshair experiment. Bending the laser light into a slit experiment would be cool too.
@odal6770
@odal6770 4 жыл бұрын
I wonder what we would see it we moved the screen to the location of the last mirror, without using neither the mirror nor the lens.
@saleshpal4924
@saleshpal4924 4 жыл бұрын
I have cleared my confusion through it
@wayneyam1262
@wayneyam1262 5 жыл бұрын
can I just shot two laser together at home and see the interference?
@papz5049
@papz5049 8 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍👍👍
@andymiron7941
@andymiron7941 2 жыл бұрын
Proof that Light is a wave of energy and that Photons does not exist as particles at all.
@cristig243
@cristig243 3 жыл бұрын
Special Relativity still holds based on a mathematical prank . The relativistic dummy copy of the Sagnac formula is a shameless make up. It is the same v = Rw formula used by Sagnac, yet written in a funky way, such as to induce the illusion that it is relativistic.The only relativistic "contribution" is the Minkowsky ct^2 = ct^2 1 = 1 start. Crucially, the c + v (as measured by a relativistic stationary observer !) is artificially implanted through the back door, without any theoretical justification. The cheap clownery is eventually useless, because if you chose R tends to infinity, you measure c + v in a straight line.
@dreamdiction
@dreamdiction 3 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Relativity is bullshit.
@anonmoto4648
@anonmoto4648 3 жыл бұрын
ether does exist
@asdfasdfuhf
@asdfasdfuhf 5 жыл бұрын
"High quality" ... 480p
@mitocw
@mitocw 5 жыл бұрын
These videos are well before the days of Blu-Ray and HD video.
@lordblanck7923
@lordblanck7923 3 жыл бұрын
hahh, i think its cause they are old videos.
@Mathin3D
@Mathin3D 2 жыл бұрын
MI freaking T!
GIANT Gummy Worm #shorts
0:42
Mr DegrEE
Рет қаралды 152 МЛН
How a  Lens creates an Image.
22:40
Huygens Optics
Рет қаралды 112 М.
Collimate Light from an LED | Thorlabs Insights
8:19
Thorlabs
Рет қаралды 22 М.
How wiggling charges give rise to light | Optics puzzles 2
21:33
3Blue1Brown
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
How a quartz watch works - its heart beats 32,768 times a second
17:35
Optical Interferometry Part 1: Introduction & ZYGO GPI layout
27:18
Huygens Optics
Рет қаралды 131 М.
I did the double slit experiment at home
15:26
Looking Glass Universe
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН
How did the Enigma Machine work?
19:26
Jared Owen
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН