Thank you so much for all your work on org-ref. I use it almost every day for publications and lecture notes. Every once in a while, I have to produce a file that can be read by M$ Word. It looks like this has just become much easier and more reliable with version 3.
@naupakazimmerman24333 жыл бұрын
Thank you for all your hard work on this! Looks awesome.
@mbarton983 жыл бұрын
Looking forward to the upcoming videos on org-ref.
@RobHickswm3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this.
@arnabdey15162 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this wonderful work John. Can you please share the configuration to mark multiple citations (7:28)?
@JohnKitchin2 жыл бұрын
I just type M-tab to mark them. I guess that is set here: github.com/jkitchin/scimax/blob/master/scimax-ivy.el#L107
@arnabdey15162 жыл бұрын
@@JohnKitchin thanks so much. Worked perfectly :)
@Jdonovanford2 жыл бұрын
Excellent! How do you get in hydra the column headings such as "WWW", "Copy", "Edit", and "Navigation"? Should they show automatically? I get the actions but not the headings.
@JohnKitchin2 жыл бұрын
they should show automatically.
@Jdonovanford2 жыл бұрын
@@JohnKitchin They don't on my Emacs 27.2 with Prelude.
@JohnKitchin2 жыл бұрын
@@Jdonovanford I guess that could have something to do with the version of hydra you have installed. I have 0.15.0, which works.
@Jdonovanford2 жыл бұрын
@@JohnKitchin Of course! It works now :)) Thanks!
@datenschauer3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your good work! What do you think about org modes own development of a citation engine? Btw: It would be nice to have a link to the github repo in the show notes. :-)
@JohnKitchin3 жыл бұрын
The org-cite library in org-mode has a singular focus on citations that should work consistently across all exports. It doesn't do cross-references, indexes, glossaries, etc (except for what is possible in org syntax). It is also designed to be very modular, and not dependent on anything like helm or ivy. org-ref has a different goal. On citations, org-ref aims to provide the same capability as LaTex, and stay close to that syntax since it is what I do the most of. It also provides the cross-reference, index, glossary, etc capability of LaTeX for exports to pdf, and some bibtex management tools. Personally, I don't want to manage a lot of separate packages for that; they are all related to me and I want a solution that does it all. I don't mind the dependence on something like helm or ivy, although I have tried to minimize that in version 3. I learned a lot from the new org-cite development, including how to make org-ref support the same kind of features through links, and to use CSL for other exports. It serves a valuable function for people who don't need org-ref.
@datenschauer3 жыл бұрын
@@JohnKitchin Thank you for this elaborate answer! From this it seems to me I probably won't switch to org-cite in my writing process. Although I rely heavily on ebib, which I really love to organize my bibtex file. But thanks again for all your good work!
@loveoflife89953 жыл бұрын
Would you recommend ivy or helm for working with BibTeX? I'm using helm, but it looks like you prefer ivy?
@JohnKitchin3 жыл бұрын
They are both fine. I used to use helm a lot, but eventually found ivy a smidge easier to develop with, so I have switched over to it. If you use helm, and it works, there is not a good reason to switch..