THIS DECK DESTROYS THE META. UNDEFEATED 9-0.

[@adamquenano8563]

I always believed Centurion was cool without the lock

[@Ralir]

So based, it's just a cool synchro midrange deck, no need for cringe locks

[@Cashmoneez]

I’m sorry I like centurion but gd they are fkin boring to play imo

[@illseeyaonthedarksideofthemoon]

​@@CashmoneezLeast pathetic floodgate player:

[@jimtat2527]

Unless I'm missing something during G3 against the yubel fiendsmith deck, the yubel that was summoned from throne destroying spirit shouldn't have stayed face up since the player did not tribute any monsters for it's maintenance cost

[@dontaeseniours4955]

Since you placed a monster w emblema you cant summon anything besides centurion monsters so the crimson cant come out until next turn 30:48

[@littledyu-gi-oh3580]

That's incorrect. You are only locked while you control the specific card that was placed in the backrow with oath (in this case Gargoyle),at the time he summoned Crimson dragon he did control Gargoyle so the play was legal

[@dirtymarshmellow9072]

Went to locals today and full combo and after I was done I told my opponent what all cards did on the field opponent takes their turn "standby" ------------> "Main" ----------> "regeki?" I say ok and nothing is destroyed, Primera is in backrow We both proceed to laugh

[@littledyu-gi-oh3580]

39:30 Veiler resolves, but at the time the Dark beckoning beast resolves it was not face up anymore so I believe it's effect still works

[@scottosmundson9845]

I typed a reply to my comment but I think it didn’t go through. Basically dbb’s on field effect is still negated by cl4 veiler. A monster being in the graveyard dodges on field targeting not negation. If effect is on field and the negation is on field, the resolution of the effect is negated. The whole vanquishsoul deck displays an example of this.

[@scottosmundson9845]

The only time you can dodge negation is if you flip ur monster facedown before urs effect resolves as facedown monsters effects cannot be negated.

[@gunnergarcia1863]

I love synchro decks because of my love for 5ds, and i have always wanted to try the centur-ion deck and now I've got everything for it coming in the mail. Well, besides the new expensive hand traps but I'll work something out 😅

[@gino6828]

i miss branded but still cool to have these videos

[@epicelite681]

Im glad you started playing the deck again. I love playing this deck when it first came out.

[@Lockon_Stratos]

I have the rest of the Centur-ion cards coming in the mail by Monday at the earliest, but I also ordered a P.U.N.K. deck core to use in it. If I had Bystial, I would run that instead, but P.U.N.K. is cheaper and still a pretty solid engine. Even better with Primus out.

[@M4rk889]

How many punk you play?

[@Lockon_Stratos]

@M4rk889 I might do a line up of 3 Tune, 3 Ze, 1 Deer, 1 Shara, and 1 Ogre for the P.U.N.K. lineup. Along with 3 E-Tele.

[@kevinalbarn120]

That retiliating goes brrrr! Not only killed the azamina combo but also forced an imperm and a xyz eff on it lol

[@rogueduelist3137]

if you cut bonds and run chimerea you can get the same field in the first game. even without chimerea or bonds you can get double blazar with that hand(even though you drew the gargoyle). bonds is never needed and chimerea makes access to multiple emblema oaths live. I know bonds can let you chain block ash on opponents turn, but chimerea can make your end boards stronger and certain play lines less susceptible to nib.

[@BlueBlast-mw7fr]

Sifr dragon is another solid crimson target as it has 3 interruptions 1. Chain crimson to summon it to fizzle a destruction effect 2. Negate a monster effect 3. Non Target destroy another card I use it as a substitute for second blazar

[@stantin17]

it's definitely solid, but i feel like second blazar is just better. if you get two blazars in rotation its gg

[@alecwilson8743]

its just worse blazar

[@blastc123]

it's a good crimson target in blue eyes to protect their new synchro from destroying itself, second blazar is better in centurion though

[@carlossaldiviaheinz6439]

Quick question, at 18:00, wasn''t it best to CL1 primera, CL2 field spell? If I understand it correctly, he could have negated the chaos angel summon with the statue with field spell CL1, or am I wrong?

[@IcyWeissy]

I think you’re right because stand up states “immediately after this effect resolves”

[@Mrsirmansir]

Looks like it didn't matter due to druiswyrm

[@stantin17]

@@Mrsirmansir what does druis have to do with it?

[@Mrsirmansir]

​@@stantin17drums chain blocks on the C.A. summons, no?

[@stantin17]

@@Mrsirmansir you can't chain block a summon that way. the way it works is you attempt to summon, you are supposed to ask your opponent if they are negating the summon or not (people usually skip this step because very few cards in the game do that), and after that summon window you start building your trigger chain links (ie druis and whatever else)

[@alexanderjackson1152]

43:50 yubel tribute itself on EP eff, why is it still on board?

[@sythal5985]

I was looking for this comment

[@Jason-dh3el]

In round 2, the guy could have used azurune on the standup summon since he synchro summoned last on the chain rather than draw.

[@westleywilson3983]

Yeah I was wondering why he didn’t use it

[@sirchristoph2162]

It’s because azurune only stops inherit summons. Not effects to summon

[@Jason-dh3el]

@@sirchristoph2162 Cards like IP, Tribrigade Revolt, etc. and in this case Stand Up has the player performing the Link/Synchro/XYZ summon. This is an inherent summon and because it was activated as CL1, Pak’s opponent could have Azurune’d it since the last thing to happen was the summon and the summon window is open for negation.

[@alessandrobruno_ibonaz]

@@Jason-dh3el i was thinking the exact same thing, ty for emphasizing it

[@caesar4557]

@@Jason-dh3el The answer is correct, the explanation is not. "Inherent" doesn't really mean anything, it's just an umbrella jargon that different players interpret differently, look at what sirchristoph said, for example. The ones you mentioned are all activated effects that perform a summon, the thing is such summon occurs outside of a resolving chain, provided they were activated as cl1, hence, they can be negated, it has nothing to do with the card instructing the player to perform an action, that is immensely vague to say the least. To me, the opponent there didn't use azurune for 2 possible reasons: 1) Pak told them 20 seconds prior Azurune couldn't negate Primera's summon from the s/t zone because "it was an effect to summon", so they thought the same would apply later with stand-up (which again, is technically correct, but that's not how those cards work) 2) They simply didn't know the interaction and/or got confused by the situation and Pak immediately declaring his chain links, as if the summon was successful by default

[@mkultrarare]

45:00 Vanguard mentioned???

[@RaffSolis]

We need a restock on this supreme pro sleeves

[@sasakhudari8346]

I l fw pak and TSX but those sleeves are not it. They're too slippery for my taste

[@mikeshredsguitar]

Hard making Ty-phon is hilarious

[@the4horsemen317]

Team sam needs to make a centurion deck box

[@scottosmundson9845]

Ok I read EVERY comment before commenting to make sure no one said this yet. I think game 3 against yubel when you summon primus and activated its effect to search emblema, you could’ve chained bonds to place back Trudea then resolved primus to add emblema then pop bonds and his yubel since you were already going down the path of popping his monsters. I try so hard to find more efficient ways of play so my heart will be shattered if this doesn’t seem more efficient.

[@scottosmundson9845]

Also I think game 2 against e hero, might’ve been better to search gargoyle as a discard instead of phalanx. Since wake up is in hand it’s pretty much a guarantee that you get phalanx in grave (most people ash primera that searched it in the first place anyway) then you can search bonds on auxilla instead of another standup to place back the gargoyle. Then use bonds second effect when you use phalanx to summon auxilla on their turn. These replays reignited my passion for this deck and it’s so fun to watch someone so dedicated playing it.

[@OGRENZO94]

28:22 Pak should be locked into cent ed monsters only right? Same turn goes onto crimson dragon plays, maybe I mis read something.

[@Paktcg]

You should read oath

[@TheDragunBreath]

40:51 Does anyone know the Yubel players cloth mat and where they got it from? It looks cool asf

[@saxonhagemann1918]

Could the Angel Statue have negated the summon of Chaos Angel? Cuz chaos Angel wouldn’t have been “unaffected” yet cuz it wasn’t summoned? Game 2, like 18:30

[@kyle5372]

Yes . A lot of ppl forgot about Azerunes effect I feel like

[@kevinalbarn120]

I love to see a Centur-ion doing full combo for once

[@RobinsAssistant]

18:21 why didnt he azurune negate the summon of chaos angel bruhhh

[@devonmantle6127]

Yeah I felt that Pak shoulda done cl 2 stand up to prevent that.

[@6210classick]

doesn't matter how the chain is ordered because Azurune negates the summon

[@devonmantle6127]

@@6210classick No it matters. For example tenpai cl eff to synchro cl 2 eff to synchro, you cannot negate the summon of cl 2 with say a judgment.

[@smithlead47]

im a little confused, on the hero match round 1 how is it that pak is able to activate so many effects even though its his opponent's turn? does he keep chaining/activating on resolution of his effects or whats the deal?

[@BlueVoid500]

When will more sleeves be in stock?

[@eldridgepogue6060]

Might be a dumb question but would it hurt to try a small azamina package in the deck like 3 wanted, 1 witch 1 deception, 1 azamina fusion spell?

[@easyygo3008]

It wouldn't hurt. He jusst doesn't have space for that, is too much to ask as his strategy revolves around the hand trap simplified gamestate

[@gubigubigubigubi]

Its funny how different different locals can be. My closest locals is usually like 3 rounds and its stuff like War Rocks or incomplete meta decks like pure snake-eyes no bonfires or S:P or Promethean lol Your locals has more rounds than the regionals in my area. Usually those are 7-8 rounds tops.

[@6210classick]

Little bit late to the party but at 51:05 couldn't ya have chained Bonds so that once Primus resolves, ya would able to destroy Bonds alongside Phantom Pain 😮

[@BoilerTCG]

I bought My centurión core a week ago , 1 day before pak Made this deck skyrocket, iam so happy

[@raikiri3035]

The first title was waaaay better

[@StrawCFB]

"A dead token" wait whaat....lolol since when they stay on the field

[@AlexA-cq7jt]

In game one that IP masq was illegally summoned. You activated oath previously

[@josef24601]

No, he removed atri from the field before summoning I:P. Restriction only applies if the monster’s on the field.

[@kevinalbarn120]

​@@josef24601 thanx, i was abaut to comment the same

[@thequick-player3432]

i dont know that would exist a person like you Pak, thanks for all ! Absolutely best player !

[@djkilla0655]

We need that support in master duel

[@manuelguzman5544]

Do you have any video with the Deck Profile of the Centur-Ion?

[@superidol8463]

18:50 why didn't he angel

[@silvanodesimone6582]

4:23 Man I would really like it if he added commentary. Like why didn't he go for double blazar there

[@Riruka_Dokugamine]

Because Emblema locked him into Centurion monsters while Atrii was in the S&T card zone

[@silvanodesimone6582]

​​@@Riruka_Dokugamine yeah I know but atrii wasn't on the field. He could have gone a different route. auxilla add wake up; wake up summon lv4 token; wake up foolish phalanx; phalanx reborn primera primus; primera primus and token makes; crimson dragon; crimson dragon effect make blazar.

[@Riruka_Dokugamine]

@@silvanodesimone6582 Yes I know that he could probably have gone for a different route with that hand, But he didn't- and Atrii was on the field when he made his second 12 since he literally used it for the summon of it. and he also didn't even have primera primus in his GY to begin with. Since he instantly went for the 12 anyways. I don't know what Pak's hand was at the start of his turn but I'm sure that he had a reason for doing what he did.

[@silvanodesimone6582]

@@Riruka_Dokugamine yeah that is what I am saying. I wish we had commentary so I could know what he was thinking

[@Valkyrion19]

Dang, this is why I don't go to locals. I can't just be told "activate effect" I would be reading every card and probably annoy the heck out of my opponent lol. Like tell me what the effect is :p

[@shiredude87]

How often is the second primera primus needed? I'm struggling for extra deck space because I'm trying to play either Stardust Sifr divine dragon or Final sigma and I'm looking for something to cut

[@CSCH69]

you make it during opp turn also quite often. searches follow up + is a Pop. Also unicorn is a card

[@metalmariomega]

This deck honestly feels like it could be completely viable without Crimson Dragon, but the ability to Double Blazar in key instances does give it a competitive edge in the meantime.

[@ericmaldonado2778]

It’s THE reason bro nothing else

[@silpheed4346]

it does jack shit without crimson though

[@RudyDedic-k9i]

I have a question, in turn 1 game 2 you special summoned Gargoyle without sending a centurion card to grave, then in the same turn you summoned gargoyle with it's effect again but this time you sent the trudea that was in S/T zone (the same card you were supposed to send unless you wanted to send the stand up centurion to summon it), so the question is, how has no one noticed it? EDIT: I'm a Brick

[@darkaltf4454]

Gargoyle has 3 effect 1 to add back 1 to summon from the S/T 1 to summon from hand by sending an S/T The first time the Gargoyle was in the S/T from Stand up effect then added back to hand after synchro summoning And then using its effect from hand

[@RudyDedic-k9i]

thanks! I totally missed it was from stand up, i'm a brick lmao

[@angeldust9090]

Dunno ,Centurion is very much Draw non engine or you loose going 2. Like Decks with a Strong Main engine more

[@masterminer2338]

Just like every deck this format

[@GameConnoisseur69]

no shit that is every deck in the game thats worth playing rn

[@stantin17]

pretty much, however pak main decks 18 hand traps, and post side he has 24 ht's so it tends to work out

[@abelramos742]

Haven't finished the duel but shouldn't the maintenance cost of yubel cause it to be off the field in game 3?

[@TheCalebH422]

2nd garunix was crazy

[@lordzaneu6749]

Happy birthday chris

[@Daxlsstuff]

Stop doing this dude, it is expensive now!

[@RobinsAssistant]

It's quite annoying. Imagine waiting for the reprints for this deck to be affordable and the the prices are jacked right back up.

[@Lockon_Stratos]

​@RobinsAssistant Yeah, I picked up Oaths at my local card shop for $6 each on Monday, but they only had 2 in stock. Decided to wait till payday to pick up the rest of the stuff and Oath was now $12-15 for both versions. I ended up buying the third anyway, but since Primus can search it, I probably should've just stuck with just two.

[@alexgalaxynexus]

bro, literally decided to build centurion 2 weeks before ycs niagra . picked up everything except primera. was planning on snagging them at the ycs. because of pack all that shit spiked and was unfindable

[@easyygo3008]

Imagine calling $10 usd cards expensive 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@easyygo3008]

Also, emblema oath was bought out. It will plumment right back where it was in a few days.

[@RICKYROSZzzz]

happy birthday Chris

[@giraitnkung]

So many illegal plays 43:09 Yubel didn’t tribute or destroy itself in the end phase 49:54 Gruesome Grave Squirmer cant destroy Phantom of Yubel

[@PapajusLtu]

Also if opponent wouldn't have sided out lvl 11 Yubel he would have won. Bounced OG Yubel, field effect to summon lvl 11. He wouldn't even be able to negate it because of his own typhon

[@VanFactor]

Thank you for the voice. Cannot watch the video without it because your interactions are difference between spice and bland lol.

[@nassimbounif7725]

Is Centur-Ion/Bystial better than Centur-Ion/Horus and/or Centur-Ion/Fiendsmith ? thx

[@Tidalx3]

I love when Pak starts cooking people they all start apologizing or coming up with excuses to why they're losing. Classic YGO players at locals.

[@purrpl8331]

This Pak’s new branded? lol *this my fav deck 🔥❤️ side note **

[@kinsy3840]

Bro Always when i plan too Pick a Deck you start playing it so i have too panic buy the core before the price goes thru the roof Stop it😂

[@Duelerama90]

My new favorite deck of all-time; Synchro summoning is just too good. Guu time

[@kevinalajko2756]

Game 3 vs yubel he passed without using yubel in the ep to tribute or destroy itself

[@kevinalajko2756]

Also you cannot pop a phantom with squirmer effect

[@fhyrajackal]

I was literally gonna comment this yeah

[@XxCuLtxX1213]

Tell Sam to restock the sleeves

[@francescopipito73]

Deck list?

[@neonidus9655]

7:27 not the thumbs up 😂

[@clearminddarkthoughts5477]

Centurion is 🐐. Double blazar is to good. I like red dragon lvl 12 too cuz it comes up and wipes snake eye

[@dimitarhinchovski1883]

Why did he waste a veiler on the dark beconing beast the extra normal is only live while beast is face up on the field or am I trippin.

[@scottosmundson9845]

He would’ve added opening of the spirit gates then pitch dbb for the dbb in grave (opening of the spirit gates 2nd effect) and then closed moon with shyvara and dbb

[@dimitarhinchovski1883]

@@scottosmundson9845 thanks

[@littledyu-gi-oh3580]

​@@scottosmundson9845 Please correct me if I am wrong, but shouldn't Beckoning beast still add opening despite the veiler since it is removed from the field before it's resolution so at the time it's effect resolves it is no longer affected by veiler?

[@scottosmundson9845]

@@littledyu-gi-oh3580yes so in Yugioh, the card isn’t “resolving in the graveyard”. Cl1 is dbb then cl2 is imperm then cl3 is shyvara. What the Yubel player is trying to achieve is the dodging of an effect that “targets” the dbb. Bc effect veiler cl4 targets dbb. Dbb is still there on resolution of cl4 so it’s “on field effect” gets negated regardless. It’s like imperming snake eyes ash on its summon effect. Snake eyes ash can attempt to activate its second effect to send a card with it to the gy to special a snake eyes monsters from deck but because it’s “on field effect” was negated, even though it is resolving in the graveyard, it’s still negated. The only method of “dodging negation” (not to be confused with dodging targeting) is by book of mooning your monster as monsters who are facedown have this property where their effects cannot be negated. Ex. Cl1 dbb, cl2 imperm, cl3 book of moon target dbb, cl4 veiler target dbb. Veiler still goes through and negates dbb then cl3 goes through and flips dbb and this flipping removes the negation from dbb. So when cl1 comes around dbb would still search.

[@jacobrandall5185]

Just a small tip dont put the record in title people like not knowing the result

[@simonezaza1863]

How can he summon auxila with atrii and primera primus, both being tuners? He did that at least twice and I'm at 37'

[@thejuanma001]

Read Atri

[@Lockon_Stratos]

Atrii effect: "If this card would be used as Synchro Material, you can treat it as a non-Tuner." It's the first sentence of the text.

[@simonezaza1863]

@@Lockon_Stratos guys...

[@darkenblade986]

where is the deck list?

[@laxusplays818]

I believe it’s his video from a few days ago the one tittled “my undefeated 10-0 yugioh! YCS”

[@samwoolcock9336]

Centurion love!

[@smithlead47]

deck profile?

[@jonanderirureta8331]

Nah, still needs more support, right Konami??

[@BeastModeYGO]

you can't summon I:P after you activate Emblema to place a monster only if you set a spell/trap

[@Paktcg]

It only looks you while the monster is face up.. so yes you can.

[@BeastModeYGO]

Oh wow, i never noticed that, thats insane! Deck is broken​@@Paktcg

[@GameConnoisseur69]

laughing emoji

[@ora5799]

Explaining this to people at locals comes up so often its wild

[@grossoutcome2519]

Summon of crimson at 54:03 was illegal bc of emblema'd primera ​@@Paktcg

[@brandonmanuelmoralesgonzal8196]

Podrias intentar jugar drytron???

[@pretendphilosopher2300]

i love centurion but i dont think its a good deck. pak is a great player and i put it easily in tier 2. idk how he topped with it, hes just very smart. love seeing the game play!

[@nycnow811]

Why would you have that hat ?!

[@bel_t_arran375]

Game one Turn one , since you used oath to place atrii , you could not summon i:p, this specific effect of oath locks you into Centurion monsters from the Extradeck

[@hoangphanvu6031]

It only locks u when u control the card

[@bel_t_arran375]

​@@hoangphanvu6031oh you're right my bad Like a real Yugioh Player i could not read the card 😅

[@Dylligraphy]

My Yubel brethren, side Metaltronus and hit Crimson Dragon then Summon Veiler or Ogre

[@RobinsAssistant]

Why summon veiler

[@Dylligraphy]

@@RobinsAssistant because it has same attribute and ATK as Crimson Dragon to chain to it negate it and Summon off Metaltronus then you can use it as Link Material or whatever

[@EyesOfNeji00]

Dopeee

[@ToxicZ0mbie]

Stop promoting something that hasn't been available for 2 months

[@MordecaiThe33rd]

I used to be able to enjoy playing this deck, then once Pak posted his YCS list, every sub-70-IQ player in existence decided to net-deck and now its the only thing I see when testing online. Make sure to reply your need for validation below.

[@djkluee]

Epic ending for a video, ulti pull 😎

[@fletchyfishing6911]

You misplayed turn one, you cannot special summon monsters from the xtra deck except centurion monsters after you activate oath, hense you could not summon I:p, technically a illegal move

[@maxmyers2734]

the lock is only in effect when you control the monster, or a monster with that same original name, that was placed with oath.

[@Harmonic14]

I wish people would read cards before commenting

[@thomasmanzo-g1z]

First!

[@Hawken123Phone]

You draw like no sense wtf xd Normal that youvwin xd

[@jaxckpryda6761]

deck profile ?