Palworld Pokémon lawsuit update: Pocketpair CAN win!

[@NeosparkJ80]

Nintendo don’t own the mount patent. All games have it, even final fantasy mmorpg games. My mom and brother still think Palworld is a ripoff. But I do hope Palworld wins. When they do, I will try not to rub it in on their face.

[@christiandavidcoate]

They clearly have not played Palworld to think it’s a rip off. The similarities end at the monster catching and taming mechanics. It’s a survival game first and foremost.

[@queaye1939]

Pokémon has more in common with Yu-Gi-Oh than Palworld my friend

[@christiandavidcoate]

@@queaye1939 I have almost 200 hours in Palworld. It’s more like ARK with monster taming.

[@NeosparkJ80]

@ how?

[@NeosparkJ80]

@by cards?

[@cliffordkun2844]

I'm really sad to see what Pokèmon have become especially with bullying other monster franchises to remain dominant in the monster taming genre. I'm glad that Digimon and other monster franchises made the right choice by supporting Palworld and hoping that Palworld would win the lawsuit because creativity and imagination as well as their right of existence would be in danger if Pokèmon wins the lawsuit. Despite me liking Pokèmon, I hope that Pokèmon lose the lawsuit or settle the lawsuit because if Pokèmon wins the lawsuit, we would have to say goodbye to Digimon, Monster Rancher, Yu-Gi-Oh, Neopets, Yo-Kai Watch, Bakugan, Palworld, Monster Hunter, Monsuno, Moshi Monsters, Monster Sanctuary, TemTem, Nexomon, Chaotic, Monster Crown, Cassette Beasts and other monster franchises especially potential new monster franchises. Another worst case scenario if Pokèmon wins the lawsuit, we would have no choice but to play or buy Pokèmon as well as supporting the franchise because Pokèmon would be only option since Digimon and other monster franchises are gone from existence. Pokèmon should be ashamed of themselves for their actions such as bullying other monster franchises as well as wanting to monopolize the monster taming genre.

[@ThunderTheYellowJolteon]

I wouldn't really be surprised if SEGA decided to give PocketPair a fair amount of money and supported them as well.

[@infern209x]

How many times do I have to tell you clifford, digimon isn't in trouble, its not a pokemon ripoff, digimon is a tamagotchi spinoff brand, vpets, came out the same year as pokemon but hit the west first in 1997, its manga came first too, then both animes dropped the same year. And digimon you don't capture monsters, you have a partner digimon and you save both worlds from destruction fighting for survival. And the games are like persona/shin megam tensei, not pokemon. Pokemon is a ripoff of dragon quest and shin megami tensei, pokemon has no case against digimon. Stop the fake fearmongering on digimon.

[@drakofox1362]

​@@infern209x same with Yu-Gi-Oh it's unique enough and big enough to fight Nintendo back

[@infern209x]

@@drakofox1362 facts, yugioh isn't a ripoff of pokemon either.

[@baalfgames5318]

I would not feel bad for Pocket Pair. If the way they advertise Palworld on their steam page, and their previous game: Craftopia, is anything to go by, then they're anti-environment/zoosadists who deserve to be shut down. I can only imagine they only added the ability to fight poachers just to save face, because instead of advertising that, they advertise all the colorful ways you can kill and abuse pals, instead.

[@theactualrealpikachufans2018]

After finding out about what the supposed filed patents are now that we know, now PocketPair has the win cause all they have to do is say “Hey Nintendo/TPC, you guys aren’t the only ones who have put out a monster catcher game series/franchise because there’s a whole lot of other monster catcher games out there, so Pokemon isn’t the only one that exists therefore this lawsuit is very vague, very petty and is an act of bullying while at the same time not following Japanese laws.”.

[@cliffordkun2844]

I agree with this. There are other monster franchises that are just as good as Pokèmon.

[@theactualrealpikachufans2018]

@cliffordkun2844 Yup, so Pokemon isn’t the only monster catcher game in existence and it’s not gonna be the only monster catcher game in existence because not everything is gonna be about Pokemon.

[@zaxentothegreedy7816]

Pokemon wasn't even the first one either, as I believe Shin Megami Tensei predated Pokemon Red and Green by around 3 and a half years. Shin Megami Tensei is still going strong right now too I think, and is not too obscure of a series to have been overlooked especially in Japan.

[@drakofox1362]

​@@zaxentothegreedy7816 and one of those Ultraman games predates the SMT games as well

[@Rojaniel]

Megami Tensei, man. Megami Tensei.

[@unknown000001000]

History may not repeat, but it often rhymes. In 1983, Universal sued Nintendo over Donkey Kong, which they deemed to be too similar to King Kong, It turned out the Universal had no legal claim to King Kong and knew it, resulting in them having to pay damages. Now Nintendo is the bully... (

[@electrobob992]

That would be copyright, while here it's Patent based. Such as "Play a game during a paused menu" would be a mechanic, and could be patented

[@unknown000001000]

@@electrobob992 The parallel that I was trying to make is the fact that in both cases, the bully is just pulling something out of their rear. In Universal's case, it was a copyright they did not own. In Nintendo's case, it's patent trolling. :3

[@Unknown_User174]

@@unknown000001000 Type A and Type B Palworld wokeness.

[@altercard5389]

For the mounted mechanic there's ark survival evolved with cryopods allowing you to summon a creature to traverse the land sea and sky in an open world.

[@electrobob992]

And minecraft, which has horses and pig, that if I recall CAN be put into boats at least in mods.

[@PichuStardust]

I'll always be a pokemon fan through and through until the end. And normally, i would stand by the side of pokemon, but i am on palworld side. Apart from the "inspiration" of much of the pal monsters looks. The game isn't anything like arceus, and it's dumb to try and claim ownership of real-time open world combat.

[@unknown000001000]

The sad thing is that if Nintendo had played by the rules and actually tried to compete fairly with Pocketpair, Pokemon could've been improved by leaps and bounds as a result. The resulting arms race could've been a huge win for fans of both series... X(

[@ThunderTheYellowJolteon]

Why didn't they sue SEGA for Sonic Frontiers having a similar open world to Breath of the Wild? This lawsuit makes no sense, and the amount of money is hilariously pathetic. That amount of cash isn't even threatening.

[@circledude2362]

Better question: Why didn't SEGA sue nintendo, the Pokemon Company AND Gamefreak for the future paradox Pokemon being too much like the Metal series robots like Metal Sonic? Clear examples of Future paradox Pokemon being too similar like Metal Sonic robots are Iron Bundle and Iron Valiant. I mean, the F.P.P.'s names all begin with "Iron". That's a metal. and "Metal" is part of Sonic's Metal Series robots' names. Hello? Iron Bundle, Iron Valiant, Iron Moth, Iron Thorns, Iron Hands after Metal Sonic, Metal Tails, Metal Knuckles, Metal Shadow? Come ON!

[@Magicwaterz]

Due to the honor system, they won't make a stink if they don't do it in the first place, similar to what a mobile company did to Nintendo. Funnily, it's Nintendo making the stink this time.

[@ThunderTheYellowJolteon]

@@circledude2362 SEGA will sue Nintendo if they find out LMAO.

[@circledude2362]

@@Magicwaterz SEGA might as well found out Iron Valiant is too much like Metal Sonic. so copyright infringement

[@danielmalinen6337]

Nintendo sued Sega at the end of the last century because Sonic is a platformer and has a scrolling screen which Nintendo had patented, but they finally settled. So it may be that in order to respect the so-called Code of Honor, they won't sue them again because of that case. Or maybe Nintendo just doesn't want to break up with Sega again.

[@IaeyanElyuex]

PocketPair MUST win or else the whole industry is wholesale cooked.

[@thebigmanishere]

Pocket pair winning their lawsuit against nintendo no matter what will be the good ending for not just people who like palworld but the gaming community whether or not nintendrones like it or not.

[@grantskolos4128]

Remember that Square Enix game that came out in 2010 that let the player summon a chocobo to fight in combat in an open field, as well as mount. Then later it was able to fly and go underwater. Also a small company called Capcom made a game called monster hunter 3tri that I watch back in 2010 where the player in a 3d field could throw tranquilizers at monsters to catch them. Of course those monsters joined the players team by becoming part of the equipment of said player.

[@bryanmerel]

It is still upsetting that many Japanese are siding with Nintendo simply out of blind brand loyalty and not out of any logical reason.

[@Omid-v7d]

That's absolutely true...I'm Japanese and I'm astounded by their blind stubbornness. Every time I point out the problems with patent litigation, they call me a villain.

[@02brother]

why i love this video : 1. good news for palword 2. megaman x6 inami temple theme

[@johnm9263]

we honestly need to have the parent patent and all child patents be removed and considered invalid, because its based on a mechanic that existed basically forever

[@leonoliveira8652]

Ooh yeah, it's all coming together. Hope Nintendo falls flat on its face in court - that or the court is corrupt. (Considering Nintendo's origins, I wouldn't put it past them from pulling some shady stuff)

[@electrobob992]

A lot of people feel that the worst that will happen is the game won't be available for sale in Japan. Which if that happens, I hope it bites Nintendo in the butt elsewhere. Where future Palworld products and games BEAT Pokemon in other countries. Basically what happens to certain anime and such in Japan. Where those are more popular in Japan, but dead in others.

[@leonoliveira8652]

@@electrobob992 There's anime that's basically dead in the west anyway but not because of japanese companies tho. Macross is one. Because of Robotech we can't have proper macross in the west.

[@MrWrestlingGod1989]

Simple solution make the Pokémon game that we want, stop locking Pokémon behind a pay wall and listen to your community like pocket pair has done and your game will succeed, I know shocking right?!

[@xionshiyon6269]

FINALLY someone who brings up craftopia and its capture system! And uses the older footage of the game! Craftopia came out before legends and already had capture and ride mechanics! Like legends you can catch the creatures without battling them but like in palworld punching them in the face first does make it easier to catch them. Nintendo is just salt that "pokemon with guns" became palworlds call to action when in reality if ANYONE could go after palworld it would be ARK as it has more similaritys with that than pokemon

[@baalfgames5318]

I would let an elephant trample me before I punched it in the face, tbh.

[@danielmalinen6337]

I don't understand people who still support Nintendo in this case just because they don't like Sony for personal, taste, loyalty or political reasons. Because those Nintendo's patents are too broad and vague, which is a threat to the entire game industry and even the Japanese (at least some) now think that it's strange that they are legal and granted.

[@baalfgames5318]

Nintendo might be greedy, but at least they aren't zoosadists like Pocket Pair is. ...Then again, Kid Icarus Uprising, Splatoon 3, Kirby and the Forgotten Land (to an extent) and several of their other games put that into question.

[@firepoet6926]

Sony is the one who is fueling Palworld so that they can get a cut of the Pokemon slice onto Sony platforms. And from what I’ve seen from those who showed details, Sony made the first move.

[@danielmalinen6337]

@baalfgames5318 We can then say that Pokemon is luckily just a human-sadist and they wrote several Pokedex entries about how many Pokemon hunt, prey, stalk, lure and kill people. And then they send children to catch and train these creatures. Like, for example, the Moon Pokedex entry says that if you see Gengar, give up because your life is over. And its other entries talk about how Gengar sucks the life out of its victims, laughs at the shadows and you only feel the air getting colder until you are lifeless. And then, we're not talking about carnivorous mushrooms, Foongus and Amoonguss, that mimic Pokeballs to lure other Pokemon and trainers only to spray poisonous spores on them and spread their kindred that can grow anywhere. And these two examples are just scratching the surface.

[@baalfgames5318]

@danielmalinen6337 Pokemon was never advertized as a "human-sadist game."

[@dimanarinull9122]

the mount patent is EXACTLY the same mount system that existed in Ark:SE(a game from 2015) down to the key-functions and mount class specifications. I'm not talking about "it's sort of similar and is just different in tiny areas" I am talking exact copy down to the specification of a button presses to switch between fly-mode and walk-mode for flying mount, the land-sea-flyer classes, the specific characteristics of each class, etc. ark did take its mount system from other games, but they didn't patent this, they also were somewhat different in functionality in some areas to many other games of the era, nintendo not only copied it to a T, they patented that system and are using it to sue another company that copied from the same source - Ark(stated as a major inspiration for palworld, and evident by its gameplay).

[@circledude2362]

oh yeah. the riding mechanic in palworld is based on the one from ark. Nintendo has NO ownership on that

[@dimanarinull9122]

@@circledude2362 yes, same goes for the mount system in legends arceus, apparently.

[@dumpmail-xz2qp]

I think devs should start creating and releasing game mechanics no matter how dumb as free open demos just to spite nintendo and keep them from patenting bs

[@antiheartless45]

Outstanding was waiting for this video

[@muffinchubby2352]

😅 Just realised how palworld brakes the battle patent: battles can happen without you being involved. Pokemon has a battle radius, palworld doesn't. You don't throw a pal to start a fight, you throw a pal to indicate its task. Dose palworld allow for easy switching??? Depends on how you word it. In palworld you need a saddles and you need to mount (you can't simpley switch like in pokemon). I presume there taking about pokemon ride, which was introduced in sun/moon.

[@darkangelfire1]

The fact that a company would file a patent on such a simple idea. It's ridiculous. Thank you Nintendo, for stifling people's creativity.

[@drzombiezzz9718]

That thumbnail you break the heart of Pokémon, well that’s ok

[@Rocketlux]

Yeah don't forget bakugan has a similar concept

[@PichuStardust]

It does?

[@Rocketlux]

@PichuStardust well kinda the little balls are the monsters bakugan is a mix between pokemon and yu gi oh

[@drakofox1362]

​@@Rocketlux what about monsoono then? It's kinda like Pokemon but instead of spheres they use cylinders to capture and throw the monsters out

[@Rocketlux]

@drakofox1362 i never seen that so I'm just talking about ones I heard

[@komradekush3411]

Why did you steal your thumbnail art from Pikachu on Acid by high5toons without crediting them?

[@ponocni1]

My guess was that either it has to do with them trying to do proxy war with sony, or palworld is first real competitor in the space that shown world how stale and bad modern pokemons are. Also it did not help that pocketpair is small company that was ripe for legal bullying, something Nintendo legal department does constantly toward fans and content creators. But they overplayed their hand with this one.

[@Ivytheherbert]

Moon Channel did a fairly in depth discussion about this, and the conclusion that this is 100% a proxy fight against Sony, and that Sony is the main aggressor here by trying to find a way to monetise Pokemon-like designs and destroy the brand image of Pokemon via Palworld. It's a frivolous lawsuit, but following the logic there are some fairly catastrophic losses for Nintendo if they don't try to stop Palworld in some way.

[@ponocni1]

@@Ivytheherbert Yea I watched that one. Still if you ask me, Nintendo should step up their game and actually go hard on polish and quality of pokemon instead of throwing temper tantrum like little kids. Outcompete them on merit and quality they are 100% able to do if they try. It was their complacency of them being top dog and shoddy weak releases that allowed Palworld to come swinging this hard.

[@topgamer2690]

Let’s not forget that Nintendo stole Designs ( Plagiarism ) from Fakemon the evidence is on Pokemon Scarlet and Violet!!!!! Many New Pokemon designs were from Fakemon

[@Omid-v7d]

Is that true? Which Pokemon is that?

[@fraserodonnell7618]

Nintendo should at least leave palworld alone rather than doing that

[@jordansmith5615]

Lawsuits are the worst in my opinion There are some stupid lawsuits besides this one

[@janaguirre4756]

Hold up, let him cook

[@mariothehedgehoggaming5306]

Nintendo is only doing this due to pokemon legends ZA being in development,not to mention,the fact some mods from 2012 probably made nintendo lose a lawsuit is funny,fuck when are we bringing pixelmon into this?,fuck bring starbound into this cuz it literally has the same mechanic as palworld as an optinal thing,you can tame monsters by throwing a ball at it and have said monster fight along side you,unless Starbound came out after aecrus i can see so,so many different ways this can fal onto nintendo,nintendo hates the fact people can play versions of there Games and IP in ways they do not approve of(like Then DMCA'ing pixelmon cuz you had to buy Minecraft to play a free version of pokemon via a mod),i hope pocket pair wins and i hope this lawsuit bites nintendo in the ass.

[@Blood-Moon-Pack]

lets just hope poketpair is smart enought to know all this aka craftopia and the gta thing

[@komradekush3411]

Are you using a playskool microphone? Goddamn what is that audio quality?

[@YuubiTimberwolf]

Palworld is more like Ark: Survival Evolved than Pokemon and you dont see Wildcard/Snail Games sueing them and that says something knowing what a disgusting company Snail Games is (tldr: they bought Wildcard and force the devs to strange player-hostile things since ARK is the only breadwinner they own)

[@Arguyus]

Additionally, the creature taming and fighting mechanic would also bring Nintendo into conflict with Capcom due to the Monster Hunter Stories franchise.

[@circledude2362]

Capcom can also sue nintendo for this: kzbin.info/www/bejne/p5mvd2OqaKuqoqMsi=3CbIf3PkunJVcOby

[@Omid-v7d]

Other big games may secretly cross-license with Nintendo in Japan. Maybe palworld is being sued because they didn't do that. We don't know which games have patent licenses with which companies because they don't make them public. There are countless game mechanic patents in Japan, so no matter what game you make, you're likely to infringe on one of them. This is already unreasonable. Not all game creators can keep track of patents. They don't have the funds, effort, or knowledge to look them up. But patents are a world where you can't get away with "I didn't know." If you infringe, you'll be sued. And it's advantageous to have patents. Large companies can nip new buds in the bud when they feel like it. The Japanese game industry is airless.

[@MrESEGaming]

I fear that if Nintendo _does_ somehow manage to win this case, RPG Maker users may be affected, myself included.

[@AWanderingTressym]

Ark Survival Evolved - June 2nd 2015 (LONG before the 2021 patent) Any fishing game in a 3d space, since throwing a net would absolutely qualify, and there's several hundred of those, ESPECIALLY if you count survival games. Almost every MMO since Everquest 1 has had mount systems, many of which with you throwing out an object to summon the mount. Even the pokeball system itself is a direct ripoff of Capsule captures from Robotrek, Dragonquest, and Megami Tensei. Heck, the original basis for Pokemon was off capturing bugs with nets, a real world action that far predates Pokemon by well over a thousand years. Fishing itself using Nets is several thousand years old. It is, quite frankly, patently absurd.

[@ellieysama]

Hahahha Imagine the embarrassment later on, but even more interesting Imagine that they just CAVE in when they fail to stop palworld to where they will just have no choice but to allow it to even come on the SWITCH platform cuz hey, good business etiquette practice means they will make MORE money through good customer relations from a joint venture and then in the future we can see a weird crossover between Palworld and Pokemon...its a win win no loose situation...Pokemon can improve greatly and be more popular while Palworld can still be a top indie underrated game XD, that is if Nintendo could F*cking learn to be more humble.

[@leonoliveira8652]

Since it's already in sony's hands and released everywhere else, I doubt it'll come to switch tho.

[@madDragon08]

Can't hear you over the music, but I got the info that seemed relevant.

[@unhinged-void]

WAIT NINTENDO IS GOING TO COURT!!!??? I need to keep updated more on these news

[@Ivytheherbert]

When did they file the applications though? There's a reason 'patent pending' labels are a thing, it's so that inventors can pre-emptively protect inventions they've filed a patent for but haven't been registered yet due to long processing times. It can take years to register a patent, but a 'patent pending' label notifies competitors that a legal process to protect the invention is underway and copying the invention can be deemed a patent infringement. Also, Google's AI tool is absolute not reliable as it just copies some rando it finds somewhere on the internet, and recently there have been a lot of randos making hot legal takes about Japan's patent system.

[@queaye1939]

Heres the bottom line. Pocket pair has now paired with Sony. Sony being based in Japan and Nintendo being based in Japan means heavy competition! Also the western world (america) loves the game. This is the same thing PubG and Fortnite went through. PubG sued and Fortnite won and now no one plays PuBG anymore. 😅

[@limehuzki]

1:23 if this was an American lawsuit this would be illegal. Fun fact if patents are too vague they can be taken down If Nintendo wins the industry stalls if they lose, they are going to start losing repeatedly

[@circledude2362]

even in japan, this can be seen as illegal. Cause NINtendo is trying to run a Monopoly. Even THAT'S illegal in japan.

[@recoojones7874]

Ark could sue pokemon since 2 of the patents are relevant to them

[@iamzid]

DOWN WITH NINTENDO!

[@Blood-Moon-Pack]

multiple i think trashtendo cant count the money coroded there brain

[@TatharNuar]

1:55 They're not just asking. Divisional patents use the parent patent's application date.

[@circledude2362]

@@TatharNuar which is after the release of craftopia and the pokemon mod for GTA.

[@TatharNuar]

@circledude2362 not disputing that, but the distinction matters for prior art generally. The prior art also needs to contain *all* of the elements to either be prior art or infringing -- which is why divisional patents even matter. If there isn't a catch rate display (for example) it isn't relevant, unless you add another element to the defense, such as the difference not being eligible for protection under a utility patent (the arbitrary catch rate exists whether or not it's displayed) or the invention lacking an inventive step (anyone with ordinary skill in the art of game development could do it)

[@Kratos7560]

It's a despicable tactic. I expect nothing less from Nintendo's law team. It's going to be straight schadenfreude if they lose to Palworld.

[@artieb89]

Ark Survival Evolved had all of those things in it before Palworld came out too. I mean you can use Cryopods to "capture" your creatures(after taming/breeding of course), you can mount a large portion of creatures in the game, and obviously you can't fight other creatures with your own. So Nintendo's case should be thrown out because they are not unique to Pokemon.

[@shadowbolthaseo1861]

I really hope you are right

[@kingisaacofimaginationland3664]

Well, of course they can win it just one simple similarity no biggie

[@TimefordiscordsonicmanbcsImYou]

Well boy is it done the female eye zoom?

[@VaporShiroVTuberCh]

Anti competition!

[@PedroHenrique-nm5lp]

Gud video =)

[@TimefordiscordsonicmanbcsImYou]

Excuse me bro is it done?

[@AubergineMiller101]

Palworld should sue back for being sued.

[@blackmage20]

Okay I'll admit, I only watched the first 35 seconds of this video. And this is because of your definition of the word, "multiple". Claiming that multiple should mean "more than 3" is beyond stupid as the literal definition of multiple is simplly, "more than 1". Even 1.5 is technically, "multiple". Because of this, I stopped watching because if you start with information like that, I can immediately assume I shouldn't trust the rest of the video, and thus shouldn't waste my time on it.

[@DakumunDahBat]

That's kinda wild, considering all that is is a simple misunderstanding.

[@MuscularHamster-t6w]

Nintendo sued Palworld not specifically because of the patent infringements but because a lot of the pal designs took some heavy "inspiration" from pokemon. They are just using the patents as an excuse to sue Pocketpair. You know why Nintendo haven't sued World of Warcraft / Craftopia for having "open field with summon-able mounts"? cuz they didn't copy any pokemon's designs. Honestly, Pocketpair could've just avoided all of this if they had just used their own creatures.

[@Kakachi07]

Heavy Inspiration still isn't copying, they aren't 1 for 1 and are different enough to pass. They're suing Pocket pair because they are an actual threat to the pokemon brand as competition, especially since they are teaming up with Nintendo's arch nemesis Sony to broaden the franchise of Palworld. And they haven't Sued World of Warcraft or Craftopia because they wouldn't win the suit. People are pointing out Craftopia because the parent patent still came after Craftopia which used all of those mechanics before they were patented which means Nintendo really doesn't have a leg to stand on legally and if they actually win the case it's because of the heavy bias the Japanese people have in favor of Nintendo, meaning it's most likely not a fair trial for PocketPair. Honestly it's super petty and stupid to be this hung over a few designs that are similar, as if Pokemon didn't do the same thing with Dragon Quest when it came out.

[@MichaMundy]

Bro is actually pulling something up his own ass lmao 😂. Pokemon choosing the copyright lawsuit route is literally even dumber since in that case they will definitely not win and look even more dumb, literally alot of online lawyer already said this. that's why they go with the more vague patent lawsuit cause they hoping it can "stick" more

[@MichaMundy]

​@Kakachi07 Yeah, essentially what this video says, it's a "lose lose" situation for nintendo now. well, they definitely deserve it tbh, if the would just i dunno use those legal fee and time to actually make a good modern pokemon game, then they could ya know actually out match the competition but i guess it's too big of a task for them huh

[@Kakachi07]

@@MichaMundy That's the dumbest part of this entire thing. If Gamefreak actually put in effort they wouldn't need to resort to this BS. It's not even a time issue anymore, the quality of work they put out even under crunch time is still novice levels in Game development. The only reason it's stayed like this is they've had no competition biting their heels. Pokemon was a Fluke for Gamefreak because of how popular it got, now years later their inabilty to make basic level game design choices is showing more and more with each new release. I can't wait to see the dumpster fire that is Legends ZA. I Ain't buying it at all, especially if I see no actual improvement on the effort part.

[@MuscularHamster-t6w]

@@Kakachi07 idk man i would be pretty pissed if someone just took my hard work, changed it enough so it can avoid a copystrike from the original creator and made thousands of dollar from it. If they hadn't copy the designs, I think palworld wouldn't have gotten so popular, after all it's known as "pokemon but with guns"

[@UDUC]

the discord link to your server in your channel description is broken and you have still not responded to my request for a way to contact you. is there a way that i can contact you about your plagiarism?

[@circledude2362]

circleboy123 discord name

[@UDUC]

@@circledude2362 thank you.