Particle Separator Efficiency Test

Don't be fooled by misinformation that our KWT Particle Separator is not as efficient as we've stated. This is a test proving just how efficient it really is, with an efficiency rating of 97-98% you can see the amount of dirt collected just before reaching your stock air filter. With these numbers and requiring no power, and no loud fans, this is the best off-road particle separator on the market today!
Dirt Tray Before Test: 448 Grams
Dirt Tray After test: 467 Grams
RZR Filter Before Test: 603.5 Grams
RZR Filter After Test: 604 Grams
97.5% Efficiency
For more information: www.KWTfilters.com
#kwtfilters #kwtparticleseparator #polarisrzr #canam #cfmoto #hondatalon #offroad

[@jeffsalazar4537]

Amazing product. I can't wait to order o e for our talon. thanks for sharing

[@SimmCity3]

Are you going to have something for the 2024 Pro R soon?

[@Roostfactor1]

Looks promising but how much suction did you have? I would guess if you had a lot of cfm going through your system it would work great! But how does it work in real world scenarios when engine demand is constantly varying, especially for the non racers?

[@KWTFilters]

The KWT uses the induction of the engine to pull the airflow through the particle separator and removes up to 98% off all dust and dirt before reaching the stock air filter. Dyno test results are posted on the website here: kwtfilters.com/pages/how-it-works. No reduction in power or air flow restriction. Works best for the every day UTV driver in all conditions. There are several independent reviews and tons of testimonials of this but this one might help: kzbin.info/www/bejne/oquUlHRna9Seh8k. No power required and no noise for an enjoyable user experience.

[@Roostfactor1]

@KWT Filters I understand the concept, and that it would work well when at high engine rpm when intake velicity is high. What I am curious about is how well it works when intake velocity is lower such as cruising at low rpm behind a vehicle in dusty conditions? I'm not doubting your design, just curious!

[@KWTFilters]

@@Roostfactor1 Thank you for specifying that John, you are correct! It is slightly more efficient at higher RPMs, however it has been tested at lower RPMs cruising around as well and the efficiency is still comparable to that at higher RPMs. We have more testimonials on our website as well! kwtfilters.com/pages/testimonials. We love hearing from our customers how great it is working for them!

[@Roostfactor1]

@@KWTFilters And thank you for the clarification! I'll give you a call to place my order.