Patterns of Evidence EXODUS - 10 - Israel's Conquest, Jericho and events of Biblical Joshua

[@sucorrolawrence3233]

Shalom Praise the Lord Halleluyah Thank you Dr David Rohl for such precision in nailing the Truth on these false academic presumptive citations. I am so blessed to follow your Truthful study and stand Tall in defence of my Holy Bible against any tyranny.

[@Zebred2001]

I have no religious or cultural skin in this game but David Rohl presents a very very cogent case. I'd almost say it's compelling!

[@bosse641]

It sure is. Amazing.

[@josefperry3836]

I've listened to Egyptologists and archaeologists try to explain how the Israelite stories in the Bible are mere mythology. But their explanations are vague. They repeatedly say there is no archaeological evidence of the Israelites until around 1,000 BC. But they also say, contradicting themselves, that the Israelites didn't get to Jericho until around 1,400 BC, 180 years after Jericho was destroyed and deserted. Therefore, they argue, the story of Joshua and Israelites conquering Jericho must be made up. And now here comes David Rohl matching the archaeological evidence uncovered in three cities with the texts in the Bible and with a tenable revised time line for these events. What do the critics have to say to Rohl's reconstruction of that period? I wish Patterns of Evidence as a documentary was a bit more confrontational or hard-hitting in exposing the ambiguity critics are hiding behind. Perhaps David Rohl should have tagged along as a companion interviewer to filmmaker Tim Mahoney. It's too bad this noteworthy research is viewed only by 524 KZbin watchers and not on Netflix or Amazon Prime.

[@aggabus]

I see before.. Lovely.. Who offered his son