Paul McCartney is dead and The Government made The Beatles | Awful Music Podcast Clips

Watch the full episode here: • The Government created...
Awful Music Podcast is available on:
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/5EOaUWd...
Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Watch more Awful Music Podcast episodes here: • Awful Music Podcast
Awful Music Podcast clips: kzbin.info/aero/PLg...
Support the channel by becoming a member:
/ @becometheknight
Follow my band Crusade:
/ @crusadeofficial
/ crusadenash
/ crusadenash
/ crusadenash ( @Crusadenash )
SUPPORT ME ON SUBSCRIBESTAR!!!: www.subscribestar.com/become-...
Become The Knight merch: teespring.com/stores/become-t...
Wanna TIP? I accept PayPal and bitcoin!
Bitcoin Address: 1BBWEk7Qo8Rrm7RdRWsizVj6pRmACbPHH6
PayPal Email: [e-mail]
Support the artist who made the new channel graphics: / ragethedragoon
MIKE THE MUSIC SNOB: • Mike The Music Snob
Watch me make music on RANDOM JAMS!: • Random Jams!
Instagram: / become_the_knight
Facebook: / becometheknight
Twitter: / becometheknight

[@richardthomas2448]

The guy playing Paul today is billy shears, this guy is not the bio paul

[@paulmahoney5937]

MK-Ultra is freaking real.

[@jimcortez3838]

It’s very noticeable the James Paul McCartney1966(JPM) is diff person to Sir Paul by watching their Bass playing performance. JPM played the Bass very nice and easy with bass chord patterns and not looking at the bass, while Sir Paul is playing it in simple chord, less chord pattern and always looking at the bass, see and compare the video “ Cant buy me Love,, Till There was You,, and Yesterday for the guitar and see the difference,, they are 2 diff person..

[@bluesky6985]

Billy is right handed so he has to play bass left handed. He probably can play good right handed

[@EmperorTigerstar]

George definitely used drugs and it was George’s dentist that introduced LSD, not John Lennon’s.

[@jamesglass7044]

Emperor Tigerstar what are you doing here

[@bajorekjon]

Yeah, John and George definitely did a lot of LSD in the 60s. I think Paul and Ringo only did it once.

[@Kieop]

The official story is that John and George were dosed by George's dentist in early 1965. Ringo tried it for the first time at an LA party that summer where a conversation with actor Peter Fonda led to inspiration of She Said She Said. Paul believes that he didn't try LSD until late 1966, but there's a strong case that it was in Dec 1965 at Tara Brown's house and that it was the true inspiration for Got to Get You Into My Life, though Paul says it's a love letter to marijuana, the lyrics contain wording more consistent with an LSD trip and John Lennon believed it was LSD, but he wasn't sure, since he didn't write it. Paul goes to the press in 1967 to extol the virtues of LSD and horrifies the other Beatles, b/c this will put them on the establishment radar, who had been protecting them up to that point. John would be busted in 68 and George in 69. But if you believe in conspiraciy theories, then Paul's "confession" does seem orchestrated to "normalize" drug use for the youth.

[@PerfectedInDeath]

@@Kieopit’s odd how george took LSD in early ‘65 but he ALWAYS references 1966 as the year that changed his life

[@Kieop]

@@PerfectedInDeath George is referring to his first trip(s) to India and meeting Ravi Shankar. He had used the sitar in 65 but that was through the Angadis and the Asian Music Circle. Meeting Ravi changed the entire course of his life. There is an 80s interview, however, that PID people point to in which George implies he doesn't want to talk about 1966 because he doesn't want to go into drug thing. The further implication is that it may be because of the war on drugs of the 80s. It is clearly a reference to drug use, but as you say, he took LSD in 65 and the emphasis given was on his reticence to discuss it, which PIDers take as a "cover story" for what he really didn't want to talk about.

[@photobearcmh]

I hope the one dude is being satirical. George Harrison def did drugs and had a significant cocaine problem for a while, his wife talked about it the documentary.

[@Scp716creativecommons]

While i agree, George was chasing dragons, not living high on life; there is, with enough skeptical research, reason to believe that intelligence orgs have artificially "padded" the record with certain artists use of substances. Now, having a meddlesome past with such things myself, and having heard brilliant guitarists outplay themselves on speed, and mind blowing rhymes come from previously artless mouths, while on acid; i tend towards the opposite end of "they just mush your brain, and make weak ish sound good", but i also KNOW the rainbow family connections, personally, and how they developed into honeypots like a hole for nirvana to crawl in on heroin. Or how she introduced so many to lucy

[@altamirano1932]

I was skeptical until I saw the comparison report from forensic scientists who have the same system as the FBI.... After I saw the report published in Wired Italy Magazine, I no longer had any doubts. Forensic scientists in Italy said that he may not have died, but that Beatle Paul from the beginning is not the one on stage today. Interestingly, John Lennon gives some clues about Sargeant Pepper...in the song How do Sleepy

[@TheLIVEKIWI]

lol...bollocks. O wait, they found a lookalike who could play left hand bass in the exact style of McCartney, had McCartney's voice and could write like McCartney...and his name was......Paul McCartney, you shouldn't believe everything you see on youtube.

[@mfb3042]

The videos from Justice for James Paul McCartney will change people's minds. So many were calling him Billy. You see the guy how he looked before the surgery. You see him admit it. You see George and Ringo say things.

[@handle-schmandle]

Except it’s all dubbed, coached, and photoshopped. Those “proofs” only exist on PID channels; not in the real world.

[@michaelwills1926]

@@handle-schmandleI know it’s tough to think it was a a fraud but it’s not the only one, and we all got had. Bernard Purdy will tell you “there were four drummers on the Beatles tracks; Ringo wasn’t one of them” Once you see it you can’t unsee it.

[@handle-schmandle]

@@michaelwills1926 The problem is, you only see it because you want to see it. Those of us who are better at recognizing red flags and lies can tell there’s nothing there to see.

[@beatlebrian4404]

"Justice for James PAUL McCartney" is an absolute disgrace! It uses carefully edited selected video clips to meet an agenda! Doesn't allow any comments on it that disagree! In fact I had been banned on that channel! ( so much for free speech)

[@beatlebrian4404]

​@@michaelwills1926yes this was on the Mike Williams channel he said Ringo didn't play on any Beatles records and that Ringo can't play the drums! When i correspondage with him, I said but didn't Ringo play the drums for "Rory storm and the hurricanes" good old Mike never got back to me on that one! Doesn't like free speech does Mike! your comment will just get deleted if you are disagree!

[@bradgrauer9148]

You don't grow 2" taller and 2 shoe sizes 8 and a 1/2 to 10 and a 1/2 and 8 months And if you did the handwriting analysis and voice analysis are obviously 2 of them people I've actually got multiple pictures of William Campbell way before he joined The Beatles Which if you don't know is The Paul McCartney double

[@davidlipman8093]

I've seen those photos too. But the Proles grow restless when the Narrative is questioned.

[@OCTOBERBABY7901]

There were three Pauls. The real one, Billy and Pauls twin, Mike. His "brother" Mike McGear is a paid actor. Read Miles W. Mathis paper on this subject.

[@handle-schmandle]

@@OCTOBERBABY7901 Actually there were four Pauls. Tall Paul, small Paul, regular sized Paul, and Mexican Paul.

[@nidain0490]

I think a lot of those are editing mistakes from photos for newspapers. Seriously, most of the “proof” can be explained away and what else is left is stupid enough not to even be believed

[@constantine7382]

@@handle-schmandle That's brilliant! Made me laugh out loud. And made a Hell of a lot more sense than the idiots that started this thread.

[@bandcouver]

As much as I always will love the music of The Beatles, they did make an efffective destraction from the Kennedy assassination. The media ,and Capitol, in the US finally decided to get behind their music with a segment on televison, and obtaining the rights to their music in late December '63.

[@corymartin6091]

Let's introduce you to the one and only Billy Shears.

[@davidbarton1806]

Yup Paul is dead you say goodbye and I (billy) say hello

[@blinkerz4676]

@@davidbarton1806You are not Billy, you are David Barton! David, Bart On! Woohoo

[@desertfox1273]

@@blinkerz4676 He's quoting lyrics from the song. Get it now?

[@blinkerz4676]

@@desertfox1273 You mean like "Yea i talk about Shears (yeah yeah shears), i talk about shears now, WHAT A BUNDLE OF JOY!" Yes i know this song, it is wonderful, i love Faul but Paul was better

[@Henrik2020]

That would be Ringo.

[@YinWhoo-zx2sz]

The Beatles were a Tavistock creation. They had ghostwriters doing the lyrics.

[@bls5160]

After the Revolver album. John wanted the group to breakup to get away from their handlers, but John still had to record Imagine to fulfill the contract. The new world order plan song. Then he was free until they took him out using the guy they had mk ultra-ed.

[@ArujKhan-sp6gi]

@@bls5160 Yoko was his handler and he was super excited about her handling him....

[@ShadowKiller571]

Damn that title gave me a scare for a second lol

[@davidlipman8093]

"He blew his mind out in a car. He hadn't noticed that's the light had changed...

[@davidbrown8763]

"Nobody was sure if he was from the house of Paul?...I'd love to turn you on."

[@JeffPayne-dp4fw]

The true story of the Beatles, written by Billy Sheperd, June1964. Back cover states; "this is our true story as we told it to Billy Sheperd".. He also wrote several articles for the Beatles monthly magazines... interesting...

[@beatlebrian4404]

You need to do more research into this and find out who, the made up name of, Billy Shepherd was!

[@beatlebrian4404]

@ARE3A3B-yj6jl I like your homour! Unfortunately, it will completely go over the head of most.

[@wesleycook7687]

Billy Shepherd ( Shears) didn't write the book. The so called true Memiors were found to be written by at least 3 different people, one was a girl that used to have a post on here somewhere. The comment says that this is "our true story" as we told it to Billy Shepherd.. Who's the "we" who wrote" the true story" ?

[@OldSchoolVibes1978]

Yep Billy was behind the scenes with The Beatles since the early days. Which is why he was recruited when Paul died and integrated into the band fairly easily.

[@GoemonLovesFujiko]

Within the first 30 seconds it’s clear that nobody here is qualified to discuss this.

[@GoemonLovesFujiko]

And it just keeps getting worse… 😂

[@TrulyNaturalMom]

SOCIAL ENGINEERS!! Rip Paul

[@anneannabu5130]

Ok folks here's what I think..I've been "researching" since my dad got me hooked on this 2 years ago now..and yes, ALL of this happened long before I came to earth but it's good because my view is completely unbiased , (except I gotta admit he melts me when I see pictures of him when he was my age, Omg I would've married this man in a second❤❤) but ok, back to my theory... after looking at a million photos before and after 1966 I gotta say MOST show 2 different people, I'm talking about head shape, teeth, height, skin tone..there's no doubt it's different people..the voice is less obvious, yes there are many songs in which it sounds like a slightly different voice, but it's hard to use voice as evidence since most everything was done behind closed doors in the studio from 1967 on, and it's obvious what can be accomplished with technology..even back then, and yes, new Paul is definitely slightly older, the 1967 photos clearly show this.. Personally I don't buy the common (and played out) story that the other 3 knew and were just playing games with album clues, and I believe evidence (and good old common sense) shows there were alot more people involved much higher up the food chain who came in and took over because of good old MONEY and the love of it!! Anyone should know the Beatles = MONEY..LOTS OF IT..and there were so many contracts and obligations which had them locked in for YEARS..clearly all the way thru 1974, so imagining that should boggle your mind already. Personally I believe that after "Paul" was chosen, shaped, molded and trained both he along with the other 3 were told to fulfill the remaining contracts and obligations and they would be free to each go their own way..i believe the lawyers and handlers managed to get most things moved up to late 1969/1970 which required the group to handle everything in person as a group, the rest without them finally expiring in 1974. Personally I don't believe there were many people who knew..only the group, Brian, and the higher ups directly involved..and it was the reason why so many things were done, like why Paul and Jane suddenly spilt, for no obvious reason..and John leaving Cynthia conveniently around the same time, again to divert suspicion.. and why they stopped touring and all live performances, and the most obvious, the sudden and really strange "new look" that manifested overnight AND AT THE SAME TIME...what are the odds that 4 young men all looking good suddenly ALL drastically change their appearances going from young cool fun guys to old looking dudes with ridiculous moustaches and hair that didn't look good on any of them!?!? Now think of another thing..had it only been Paul, going for the sudden overnight changes, it could've raised suspicion..BUT if ALL of them did it at the same time, it could've just been "a group thing" Ok now about the album "clues"..look, I wouldn't waste my time on that simply because A: it doesn't make any sense for them to drop clues when IF they did indeed pull a slick one on everybody..WHY WOULD YOU RISK BLOWING THE WHOLE THING BY GIVING CLUES..and B: why would Paul himself be involved in something like dropping clues that could ruin his new gig and cost him losing all the money to be made..again, they were way more smarter than that, and that's what leads me to believe instead they, (the group themselves), intentionally dropped clues because of the huge guilt they each felt knowing what had happened and what was then being done, I believe they themselves, Paul included, did it rebelliously to go against the higher ups who were by then running everything. I feel the group became almost hostages to the game..and that was what was generating all of the stress between them in the studio during that time up until late 1969 when it began to crumble. Personally I feel that the key people were each warned to play along and NOT go public with the truth and this explained the sudden really strange "accidents" that began to plague certain people..including Brian Epstein, their manager and mentor/handler who suddenly was found dead in 1968..i also suspect Brian Jones found out somehow and it's why he was suddenly found in the bottom of the swimming pool right after Brians death in 1969. I also believe it even reached John Lennon himself..he had been out of the scene for years when in 1980 he turned 40 and him feeling a major milestone he was heard a few times saying he was making major changes starting over in his life, getting back into music again..he was heard saying he was getting ready to leave Yoko AND he was going to finally tell the world the real reason the Beatles broke up..which is believed to be the truth about Paul..and next thing you know he was suddenly murdered a month after his birthday by a nobody and for no apparent reason..and then George Harrison..he's been caught on tape many times coming so close to coming out with it (Paul) and saying many times in interviews how "after that thing in 1966 it was never the same anymore"...suddenly some headcase breaks into his house one night and tries to stab both him and his wife to death again..for no apparent reason..well they both fought back and survived and George lived out his final years and coincidentally without having said another thing publcally about Paul or 1966. Coincidence..no, I don't buy that..heres where the common sense really comes in, when there's a clear pattern that's easily seen when looked at from this perspective..this and the many many little things that have happened over the years since 1970..including Paul's big weed bust in Japan in 1980 when his FINGERPRINTS DIDN'T MATCH UP WITH HIS THAT WERE ON FILE FROM YEARS BEFORE..which was QUICKLY pulled from the news and is difficult to find any trace of now..or the paternity test he recently took when an old lover from the Hamburg days tried suing him for back child support..his DNA wasn't a match!! These are things no one could've foreseen happening which explains why there were no defensive in place. It's an ongoing thing so there's still way more to be discovered and without any actual official documents to locate to back any of this up..im afraid it really IS "Speculation" but when something looks like, smells like, and tastes like something..chances are its that something!! So this is my take on the whole thing, and yea I know it's alot but when you consider all that's involved, the power of money and the threat of it being taken away can make people do things they otherwise would've never considered. The only way we are ever going to know for sure is if someone comes forward after the 2 remaining members have gone and puts it out..otherwise the conspiracy will live on...

[@brittany9414]

God bless ur dad for introducing this to u. my parents would just tell me I'm crazy lol

[@OldSchoolVibes1978]

Congratulations you're awake to this

[@anneannabu5130]

@@brittany9414 Thank you, I admit that at first glance I was like, " You can't be serious!!" but when I started to become curious I looked at stuff and quickly saw that SOMETHING did really happen.. the first thing that convinced me were many of the photos between 1966 and 1967..yes people change in time but NOT that quickly. I look at pictures of ME last year and then others of me the year before and I didn't change like that!!

[@anneannabu5130]

@@OldSchoolVibes1978 Thanks, I only got interested from listening to my dad go on about it..pictures don't lie, they didn't have Photoshop back then and it was easier to see things and it's obvious that there are clear differences between 1966 and 1967..my own face/body/bone shape doesn't change like that, so I can't believe his did either

[@lucydayLucida]

Take a look at pictures of Keith Richard from mid 1960's for an even more extreme example of the touring musician's hard road life can do to the appearance. He goes from a sweet baby faced young man to a haggard lined very different appearance in the space of a year or so. No one's remotely suggesting a doppleganger replacement there. If you think a person's face cannot change radically over a short period of time you haven't been paying attention. Look at some before/after pictures of drug users. There's nothing remarkable about the changes in Paul's appearance. You cannot determine actual measurements from pictures, especially those chosen and/or manipulated to make this point.

[@johnsaunders8021]

Like her or not Heather knows something.???

[@davidotto3731]

You guys should check out Mike Williams Paul is Dead channel. Start with his Did the Beatles Write their own music. It goes into this very deep.

[@gaylealleluia8392]

Shadow of a Bassman is much better

[@user-gf6zw4nk7d]

lol 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅.back in your basement

[@user-rv1lu2ld1u]

Billy ,S HERE

[@LawrenceRussellSaturnSelection]

Paul was killed because he was a Christian and wanted out of the game or he was simply replaced. His father was even replaced there's also DNA evidence photo evidence sound evidence it's wild.

[@oneminuteguitarlessons6732]

I wanna hear more about this kind of stuff 😀 Very fun watch and your guest was very insightful and interesting

[@brians1793]

I'm not sure if this is quite what you had in mind, but I had this comment typed out and in my copy/paste, wasn't sure if I wanted to post it or not: In all honesty I actually believe the parents panicking about Satanism in music were right, some of the most Satanic bands are non-obvious bands like The Beatles. They're not even hiding it anymore, The Satanic Temple is having after school Satanism programs in elementary schools and probably lying about Christians making bomb threats to try and play victim and frame Christians as violent extremists just like Trump supporters on Jan 6th. MRA's are Trump supporters are the 'terrorists' when it's actually ANTIFA. I was saying there's going to be a rise in hate crimes against Christians and eventually persecution particularly from the trans community before the shooting in Tennessee happened. I also believe holidays like Christmas are actually Satanic pagan holidays where people are tricked into performing pagan rituals around winter solstice like bringing a tree in your house and decking it in gold and silver, mistletoes, ect. Of course most people don't question these things but so many things just don't make sense or add up. I mean, literal Satan worshipers(thought they deny it of course to relax parents that don't take these things seriously, they're trying to desensitize kids to Satanism and trans women in particular) are trying to paint themselves as the 'good guys', good is evil and evil is good kind of thing. White Christian men bad, feminism good despite it destroying the nuclear family and enabling abusive women to destroy the lives of good men and families. It's really something. Not to mention glorifying promiscuity, single motherhood, and obesity. Body positivity is normalizing sloth and gluttony mostly in women. There's little if any difference in certain outcomes between a single father and 2 parents but single mothers are far more likely to raise emotionally weak boys prone to violence and promiscuous daughters likely to end up single moms themselves. The state favoring women for custody helps ensure the cycles continues and makes it harder for men to break it. Boys raised by single moms are probably more likely to end up trans too, especially with how boys are shamed for being born boys now. Men are becoming like women and women are becoming like men, both figuratively and sort of literally. The trans community is vulnerable and the same people convincing them people like me 'hate' them(and women, which I don't) are the same people bullying and silencing de-transitioners from speaking out on regret. Parents opposing their extreme minor kids transitioning as the state intentionally convinces them they were born the wrong gender and puberty blockers, hormones, and surgery is the answer(not a lot different than greedy people pushing the pill, ADHD meds, ect), and parents objecting to it is likened to 'genocide' and misgendering an 'act of violence' to 'justify' using actual violence and even persecution. It's so crazy, they're trying to outlaw parents objecting to their kids transitioning. An anti-gun group was saying the trans community should take up arms to 'defend' themselves, it all just added up. Baphoment is a transgender demon too, it's an obvious Satanic agenda and a lot of people either don't see that or laugh it off because they don't take religion seriously at all.

[@brians1793]

Also the theory about Christmas explains a lot, how greedy and shitty people can get around then, the rise in depression, self-deletion, ect. Abortion also desensitizing people to ending unborn children so there's that, and arguably Planned Parenthood is Satanic and it's another way the elites make themselves more powerful.

[@hellokitty104hello]

Look up Sage of Quay, aka Mike Williams

[@angr3819]

I didn't believe he died. It didn't make sense that his whole family would have kept quiet. Until a couple of weeks ago I looked into it more and discovered that he only had one brother and their father. The Beetles manager had a bad reputation for being one of the mob. If he and others wanted to keep the band going it would have been easy to threaten the father that his other, only remaining son would be targeted and threaten his brother their father would wind up dead. They would have kept quiet to save one another. The more I went into it the more I found by way of photographs which were supposed to be him but there were differences. Not only one other 'double'. I suspect the man who acts his part now might be a Paul Shepherd. How can one Paul be a very different height to another? Add to that his apparent reluctance to sign autographs. According to MSM this is only since circa 2008. However, reportedly, years ago he took the piss out of Phil Collins in front of others, when Phil asked him to sign an original LP and he didn't autograph it. This might have been that the replacement Paul has a different autograph to the real Paul. That said, if as is said the group were being misused for political purposes, Paul might have simply wanted out and may not have died. Or he might not have wanted to become that big and have his time and effort taken up for years by being in a band. It might have been great at first but if as often still seems to be case, managers kept most of the earnings he may have decided it wasn't worth it. I mention this possibility because of his cousin John Halliday who was at one time custodian of Paul's childhood home. He is the double of an older Paul. I wonder if any sleuth has looked into his aunts and uncles to see any of them had a son by the name of John Halliday? If the birth were actually registered ar their local registration office and then on central government records for births, as required by law? Perhaps Paul became John. It would take some research that I am not interested enough to undertake, with all else I have to do with what is left of my life now. So it's only an idea I am putting out there

[@marindbou4113]

Wow. Thank you 😊

[@stephenfrancis303]

Lk NM

[@zackattack635]

MI5 managed the Beatles project. They literally replaced Paul with a session musician that was 4 inches taller, had a bigger head and very different ears. Real Paul is gone and the guy who replaced him was a better musician. Suddenly Paul played brass, drums and piano like a genius. Suddenly the rest of the band hated Paul when he’d been the most liked member overall for years.

[@gaylealleluia8392]

@@zackattack635I agree except Billy may have been a better musician, but not songwriter. Paul did leave behind 50+ songs when he died. Billy’s songs after the Beatles sucked, except for a few he probably found while snooping through files. The guy took his house, farm, clothes, and royalties. Justice will never be served until Judgement Day

[@Henrik2020]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/mHTJZYWhpNyHodU

[@lesleyjane7785]

I'm so entirely convinced. Thank you so very much. Wow. You guys are uncanny. I'm so glad I got out of bed this morning! To think I could have missed this!

[@Vivi_9]

Just say anything and end with "it's well researched at this point" and you'll definitely be right, it's foolproof

[@orinbrim7019]

It’s what I hate about podcasts. Just people saying shit without proving it for people to listen to. It can be interesting at times. This guy just sounds unwell though.

[@constantine7382]

He's right in one respect. It HAS been well researched and proven to be bullsh*t. He's an idiot...... and I can prove that too.

[@constantine7382]

@ARE3A3B-yj6jl LMAO!

[@lisajackson5134]

411, Over 100 people on November 9th 1966 that evening they heard it on the radio, ' We have breaking News, Today Beatles member Paul McCartney died in a car crash.

[@gaylealleluia8392]

I heard it

[@cjs750]

I was a kid, but I remember watching "The Monkees" for the first time on NBC TV. I believe it was their first broadcast episode so the date would have been Monday September 12, 1966. As I recall, during the broadcast, a news bulletin was scrolled across the screen reporting that one of the Beatles had been in an automobile accident and that more information would be provided when it became available. I remember hoping that whoever it was would be ok. From what I understand, the message scrolled to viewers in the western US specifically reported that it was Paul McCartney who had been involved in the accident and that he had in fact been killed. There was never any follow up on the report.

[@gaylealleluia8392]

@@cjs750 that was a preview. The first Monkee’s episode was November 9, 66

[@cjs750]

@@gaylealleluia8392 No. I don't think so. I checked IMDB. It lists all "The Monkees" TV episodes and the dates they were broadcast. It states that the "The Monkees" first TV episode was titled "Royal Flush" and that it was broadcast on Monday September 12, 1966. Like I said, I was a kid (12 years old). I don't remember the episode itself. But I do remember being aware that I was watching the first show of this hyped up, brand new program. I recall a bulletin scrolling across the screen during the broadcast that stated one of the Beatles had been in an auto accident. It didn't identify which one. I remember hoping that whoever it was would be ok. I loved John's kick ass rock and rollers (which I didn't realize were actually covers of 50s American rockers), so I hoped it wasn't him. My sister loved Paul, so she was hoped it wasn't him. I also wondered if it meant this new phenom we were watching would be replacing the Beatles at the top of our music scene. A lot of us kids didn't really care for the Beatles that much anymore since their change of direction with Rubber Soul.

[@anneannabu5130]

That definitely fits in the timeline..the accident was in the early morning hours of the 9th in London..which was still the 8th in America..by that evening on the 9th in the US there was plenty of time for news to circulate and then be silenced. I myself have heard hourly newsbriefs on the radio many times about stories that were announced but then instantly disappearing next hour never to be heard again, so I can totally believe this.

[@zacksguitarhacks6390]

There is a good book that exposes a lot of connections that laurel canyon stars had with govt. I forgot the name and author but it really is outstanding I'm gonna try to find it and post it.

[@zacksguitarhacks6390]

Why would they want Paul dead though? I've seen evidence that loosely supports this but never found any motive for killing Paul.

[@chrislawuk]

I’m pretty sure you’re talking about “Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon” by the late and very great David McGowan. If not, I highly recommend that and look forward to you remembering your rec :)

[@zacksguitarhacks6390]

@@chrislawuk yes you nailed it thank you that's the book I listened to a reading of most if not the whole thing many years ago and if I can find it I'm gonna go through it again.

[@rebelwalzt]

Did you know that Mama Cast and Keith Moon lived on the same street in Laural Canyon.BUT! They died in the same house in GB?

[@surfrunnerd8457]

Jim Morrison's Dad was in the Gulf of Tonkin incident which launched us into the Viet Nam War.

[@JD43232]

0:30 No they were not proffesional musicians before getting famous. They were a mediocre bar band in the very early 60s and George Martin didnt want to sign them because they were bad musicians but got told from someone above that he had to sign them. They somehow went from mediocre musicians to the biggest band ever and took america by storm just 3 years later. But keep believing in the mainstream story about4 normal lads making it big by their talent and hard work.... haha

[@michaelwills1926]

Walked in for rubber soul without a single piece of written material and proceeded to kick out a banger. No wonder people thought these guys were geniuses

[@nidain0490]

Because they were? None of these claims have evidence

[@cjs750]

@@michaelwills1926 In a month no less. Hmmm

[@bajorekjon]

​@@cjs750 Is there a video on this? Seems interesting

[@cjs750]

@@bajorekjon Mike Williams has a KZbin presentation titled "Did the Beatles Write Their Own Music?", or something like that. Part of it includes a day-by-day analysis of the Beatles' activities during the Rubber Sole production timeframe. The crux of his analysis is that on Day 1 the Beatles had absolutely no written material for the album. Yet 30 days later the album was being mass produced for sale. His day-by-day analysis of the band's activity and his knowledge of the recording industry leads him to contend that it would have been completely impossible for the Beatles to have accomplished this on their own. His conclusion is that the Rubber Soul songs had been previously written by ghost writers and recorded by session musicians. All that was left to do was for the Beatles to provide the vocal tracks. In a sense, they were pretty much the Monkees who relied on pro song writers like Boyce and Hart and Neil Diamond and top-notch studio musicians like the Wrecking Crew. Check it out and see what you think.

[@gaylealleluia8392]

An insider said Paul and Billy were half brothers, and being born in wartime, Billy was given up for adoption. That would explain the looks and voice. Billy grew up rich, and went to private schools and learned music. Paul grew up relatively poor.

[@ThePrescriber]

It would counter argument those who say, "Paul couldn't be replaced, his looks, voice is too similar to the one in 1965"

[@jeremyb5468]

They were not related at all

[@wesleycook7687]

Keep up this stupid rumor. I like a good laugh ever once in a while..

[@user-jl3ex4ik1t]

Billy’s son isn’t cute like Paul

[@user-jl3ex4ik1t]

Me and my beatle wife…. Beatle Bill…

[@MOONBASE_Stereo_Side_Touchdown]

I will tell you guys why the industry elite took out Paul. Firstly, let's look at Elvis. Elvis was a rocker, he was content choogin' along doing what he loved most, R&Roll ! Then, in 1967, psycodelic music was just about to go down. Sex, drugs etc etc & lots of it. Elvis was summoned into RCA headquarters, where he was warned that if he wasn't prepared to ditch the R&Roll, which they told him was dead in it's tracks and switch to more psych, he would be cancelled. Hendrix hit big time. So, in 1968-69, Elvis changed his style, more psycho, which led to his demise, as he rebelled and ate himself to death. Then of course came Woodstock ! So, back in 1966, the same mob, tried to make Paul, who just wanted to sing "I saw her standing there" etc, forever, took him out because he refused to change to psych. Then WALLAH ! Sgt. Peppers ! With a new Paul, with the new sound the mob wanted. Listen guys, it's all about record sales, popularity and following trends. I hope my story helped to shed a logical light on all the theories and help everyone better understand who you deal with when you get to certain level in music. Cheers.

[@randallgiovanetti]

The Beatles/Stones were launched by MI-5 to create revenue for the Crown, that was loosing its territories. They did not write most of their songs, and, used studio musicians like the Wrecking Crew regularly. Look at the song books with binders the Beatles had in the studio - prewritten songs.

[@bottomsupbass]

I always found it odd that the New Paul was addressed as Bill by the others in interviews and outtakes. Also, Paul was a bright shining star. Lovely and charming with a versatile voice. His writing playing and execution was that of a young rocker. Within a year he’s doing orchestration, playing and arranging on piano and his writing, singing and swagger was completely different. He wrote things the Beatles of 2 yrs previous couldn’t play or come up with. Using classical , oompa, and developed new and exciting techniques still used….. idk man. We’ve found out so much recently about the theatre and misdealings produced by our respective countries in those years. From kennnedy to Kennedy to the slaying of civic leaders. Research the lsd experiments conducted by u.s. military and later institutionally. People like Ted kaszinsky , Charles Manson amd many other madmen were lab rats. Unrelated but relative

[@MrThedonhead]

You clown

[@handle-schmandle]

“Unrelated but relative” should be the motto of the “Paul Is Dead” club. Translation: we throw whatever crap we want in there and hope it sticks.

[@lucytupper69]

@@handle-schmandle: Go to Sage of Quay. Listen, then decide for yourself.

[@handle-schmandle]

@@lucytupper69 Been there; done that! If you believe anything that guy says, you're just allowing yourself to be deceived.

[@lucytupper69]

@@handle-schmandle : as I said, decide for yourself. Do your OWN research. Btw, I was only a fan of the early Beatles.

[@christophermorrisette]

really enjoyed the younger than me perspective. I grew up in it, first guitar in 1963 at 9 years old, quit highschool in 1970, ran away at 16 the year the Beatles broke up. it was all consuming is what I mean to say but it meant different things to different people. As for the mkultra there's some truth to it, didn't apply to everyone of course and if the mindfuck was meant to hinge on Billy Shears and we are actually talking about what seemed like a lark back then, well mates, there must be something to it. I grew up in Kesey Land(Oregon) and can safely speculate an attestation to the notion. I followed Mike's Whatshusname Paul is Dead KZbin channel where some of what you mentioned I have heard. An alternate theory is that after Paul dropped acid he changed completely, like a 21st century schizoid man, maybe even took residence on the dark side as they believe. Memoirs of Billy Shears is their bible on the subject. Who knows, right? In any case perhaps still the Greatest Band of All Time, Modern Era, maybe not. 😎

[@alankoz5067]

According to Dr. John Coleman, a former MI-6 agent, the ENTIRE Beatles phenomenon was created by the Tavistock Institute. "The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations" is one of his most notable works. His books are WELL WORTH the read. He's not done very many interviews but in them he has stated people like David Icke have plagiarized his work greatly. Before people try to make The Beatles into saints, it's very clear they HATED Christ and that they were DEEPLY into Crowleyan "magick."

[@DrTomoculus]

This is about as close as you're getting by title alone. I have not watched this video, because the world of Paul Is Dead is limited. Because people will just not accept, nor fathom the evidence that says there's at least THREE Paul McCartney's in operation by 1966. You can see two of them in A HARD DAY'S NIGHT. And as that was filmed on a weekly schedule, the changes in his face from week one (on the train scenes) to week 2 (the party scene) are too dissimilar to be the same person. Plus, between 1962 through 1964, that dude's height was all over the place, and it wasn't anything to do with heels or lifts. The key is to check out his right eyebrow, and how high up it goes on his forehead. Or if it doesn't. My theory is, the Moped Accident of December 1965 is an absolute bullshit story concocted to give "Paul McCartney" an identifying marker (the lip scar), so that it could be seen that theres only one. And then in September 1966, people around the Beatles start getting wacked. By the end of 1967, there were already 10 people very closely associated to them dead by unnatural causes. (Suicide, Murder, Car Accident, Overdose.) Which in the land of statistics, is a trillion grains of sand to one that that many people would die in succession like that. You can find that with the Kennedy assassination as well. Witness, Informants, ANYONE WHO KNEW JACK RUBY was on the hitlist. HOW Paul McCartney dropped off the radar for TWO MONTHS, (September - November 1966) being a Beatle living in Central London is THE QUESTION EVERYONE SHOULD BE ASKING. Because he wasn't dead. NOR WERE HIS DOUBLES. How does a Beatle completely avoid interview, article, photographer FOR TWO MONTHS.

[@paulmahoney5937]

Elvis is alive! He's still working at a 7-11 in Kalamozoo, MI.

[@wesleycook7687]

Jim Morrison takes the trash out there too..

[@MERCURYSUNSET]

😅😅@@wesleycook7687 Yeah and Kurt Cobain delivers the milk.

[@-Susso]

you guys should read "The Memoirs Of Billy Shears"

[@wesleycook7687]

Nah.

[@zackattack635]

The Beatles were a boy band that had their songs written for them. They were the Monkees basically. None of them were strong musicians… they were personalities who could sing.

[@gaylealleluia8392]

Stop listening to Mike Williams

[@dylanphelan4599]

Let It Be documentary literally shows the creative process of the band in real time. Besides why would their songs be made up for them by shadow writers or some shit?

[@YinWhoo-zx2sz]

It's true they were a Tavistock creation.

[@Henrik2020]

You guys .... 😂😂😂

[@constantine7382]

Then how did Paul become a billionaire if he doesn't own his own songs? Who's going to allow that? Paul is a great musician and George is among the most underrated guitar players in history.

[@DannyWonder]

The Beatles were so good that there are conspiracies they were a government controlled weapon or something? 😂😂😂

[@surfrunnerd8457]

Well, they are supposedly great musicians but Quincy Jones and George Martin, their producer, made statements to the contrary. They are supposedly brilliant songwriters yet Lennon was quoted as saying the lyrics don't mean anything, they're just words. And they seemed flippant and not very deep in press conferences. Films like "Help!" were embarrassingly bad. So many believe, long before the Monkees, the Backstreet Boys, 'n Sync, the Beatles were the first "boy band "

[@beatlebrian4404]

​​@@surfrunnerd8457nobody said the Beatles were great musicians, the Beatles said in interviews that they were adequate musicians! But please don't compare them to the people you have mentioned, they composed songs that will last forever the sheer success of The Beatles Forced the other record companies to go out and sign up other groups (for which the groups who came after should be entertainly grateful!) basically they changed everything in the music Industry.

[@olly6525]

Where do I find evidence of the dentist being on the MI6 payroll?

[@arthurcassuli]

When I realized this guy was being serious and not ironic, I stopped laughing and started getting mad

[@davidbarton1806]

Of course you did and you won't bother to take five minutes and look for yourself keep believing in all the narratives they feed you and not to seek truth and live in lies is exactly what they want

[@np4231]

Because you have emotional weakness. Your logical brain would research into the matter and then come to a conclusion. Instead you immediately dismiss the theory.

[@handle-schmandle]

Or, because you are sane.

[@debbee5057]

Tavistock institute look for yourself

[@hom0s4cer]

@@davidbarton1806 keep believing in all the narratives they feed you and not to seek truth and live in lies is exactly what they want

[@ArujKhan-sp6gi]

The comment section is intellectually light years ahead of the podcast..

[@cliffhass9158]

That Dude in the Glasses is Nuts!!! He's awesome!!

[@billyshears988]

By the way it was George and John that tripped with their 🦷 dentist 🪥 it’s on KZbin here!!!

[@TheGuesteMC]

How would you possibly know how many times someone dropped acid ?

[@jeremyb5468]

Call did dye that is true 100% true. Paul died and because it was a Government experiment On the masses, they had too much time money involved. So they had to get a replacement to keep this beetle Sting going. They had all the best write for making music. The Beatles dinner record. Any of their own music at the beginning are as I say. Black & white Ed Sullivan Beatles. Rolling stones to paul died every song the replacement has Made eludes 2 or is about Paul dying. That song by The Rolling Stones Ruby Tuesday. That's about Paul dying the who they have a song about Paul as well. Elton John the greyseal, that's about Paul dying. No, all the musicians know that are in the elite you could say. It's hard to believe. That the most photographed person in the world could be replaced. That should scare the s*** out of everybody. They could kill a President and put somebody in his place. It's harder to pull something like that off today. But back then before the internet, it was a lot easier. Pause family wasn't gonna say anything. They were paid and there's sons career keeps going. But for the people that don't think that happened, you m************ are dumb. It's obvious Paul says it everyone of this songs. Are you alluded to it? I swear to you

[@laveritaforza108]

According to Wikipedia... classic

[@strumbley]

John Lennon admitted to tripping multiple times...during his time in The Beatles.

[@TechnoirGraphix]

Ya’ll should bring this crew together and have Jay Dyer on.

[@lisamcwilliams1920]

Read memoirs of Billy shears or Billy’s back. He’s not a shepherd or shears. Listen to sage of quay. It explains his real name and where he came from and who’s his parents and grandparents. One of his albums states his name sake. Look Up who flew over Mt Everest first. That’s also his name sake.

[@elchango6183]

Once the hippie movement started, this country went to shits.

[@OCTOBERBABY7901]

I hate Hippies!

[@asloii_1749]

Good.

[@theneonchimpchannel9095]

A lot of the facts (or claims in the case of the Paul Is Dead story which is not true) are slightly off. It was George's dentist and it was him and John that were the first to have LSD. Paul actually held off taking it as he was scared about what doors it might open. George did stop taking it around the time they were making Magical Mystery Tour though (although he would continue to use other drugs). As for cocaine, that became more of a thing in the 70s. The drugs that The Beatles used before LSD were marijuana and before that, amphetamines. They took those during the Hamburg years in order to play 6 hour shows and not fall asleep on stage. As for whether Paul died in 1966...no. There's only 1 Paul McCartney and it's the same guy who was there from the start. His car was involved in an accident, but he wasn't in it at the time. He did fall off a motorcycle at some point which left him with a small scar on his lip and possibly requiring some dental reconstruction, but aside from that, there is no truth to those particular rumours. I can't say as to whether the government were involved with The Beatles in any meaningful way, but I don't think they were. Not in the same way that a lot of the Laurel Canyon acts were.

[@BecomeTheKnight]

I'm not a subscriber to the "Paul is Dead" theory. It seems pretty obvious they leaned into the rumors to sell more records.

[@theneonchimpchannel9095]

@@BecomeTheKnight Oh yeah,, they probably came up with the whole thing as an in joke. The Beatles shared a very twisted sense of humour, it's exactly the sort of thing they'd do. Then once it worked they would have milked it.

[@Rumham729]

And they didn’t deny that klatu wasn’t the Beatles lol

[@damienalvarez2957]

@@theneonchimpchannel9095I heard I Am the Walrus was written in response to learning that there were university courses studying Beatles songs and they decided to make the most confusing, lyrically nonsensical song they could conjure as a means of trolling.

[@philipbrown6500]

PAUL ID DEAD!

[@jonnuanez7183]

Pure bs. The Jerry Garcia lookalike is way off on his Beatles timeline. He said that around the time of Rubber Soul, they had an outsized influence on TV programs like Shindig!, etc and so that's why they did the Ed Sullivan show? Um, Rubber Soul came out at the end of '65 and they did Sullivan in February 1964. And why would our CIA track some unknown club band in Hamburg? It was anywhere from 4-6 shows a night for at least 4 nights a week. Paul was facing the opposite direction in the one on the street...Abbey Road? Nope, Magical Mystery Tour. 😂😅😅😂 Dude needs to go outside and play...

[@williamsimmons5931]

The Doors, Led Zeppelin, the Stones, the Beatles are god awful now? Lord…

[@tom_bout]

British govt

[@n91605]

They wacked him, man, the brakes were fixed .. a year before he died he wrote Yesterday it's a suicide note. He wanted out .. they had become the queen's performing monkeys .. George wrote Taxman in the spirit of Paul's rebellion .. they warned him he said he would fulfill contractual agreements with the record company .. up to Revolver.. that's a clue the lame reason for Revolver .. about a turntable.. is BS .. it was the last album and they literally did with a gun to their heads .. they fixed his scooter moped .. he chipped his front teeth .. that was your last warning mate! .. Paul wrote Paper back writer .look at the clip!!. he was offering a compromise.. I'll ghostwrite and perform just to get Billy to be me in public .. and Billy was used for 2 years already Paul was even coaching him ..

[@davidbarton1806]

Paul is dead Died September 11 1966

[@michaelkennedy6415]

I believe in the November 9th theory. The date got changed to 9/11 after the WTC bombing because of the internet.

[@lisajackson5134]

November 9th 1966

[@gaylealleluia8392]

November 9, 1966

[@michaelkennedy6415]

@@gaylealleluia8392 Amen. Correct date. So many young people on the internet have changed the date after 30 years to 9/11. That all started after the World Trade Center bombing. Freakin’ newbies. The real Paul was working on a movie score in October/November.

[@nidain0490]

No he didn’t

[@jimilove7773]

Not all accurate but interesting!

[@randyramon8437]

That was George Harrison’s Dentist

[@randyramon8437]

It was George Harrison and John Lennon

[@mrjelly5718]

it was Tavistock INstitute. but also guys, it makes no difference the songs are great so we need to thank the government or whatever institute it was that wrote the songs. but yes it was not just 4 guys playing music a lot and then getting better and then getting better at music writing and then becoming famous. Cmone guys, wake up.

[@drummessiah88]

Lemme just say this and entertain the theory that McCartney died in 1966. That means that Sgt. Pepper, MMT, White Album, Abbey Road & Let It Be were all done with a Government agent designed to look like Paul. That same government agent would form WINGS and write songs like Band On The Run and Live And Let Die.....you can imagine my skepticism. THAT, I have a hard time believing.

[@cjs750]

Who's to say Paul(or a replacement) actually wrote any of that stuff? There's a guy on KZbin(Mike Williams) who makes a plausible case that much/most of the Beatles output was actually accomplished through ghost writers and session musicians. Specifically, he does a detailed day-by-day analysis of the "Rubber Soul" project. It is actually hard to dispute his conclusion that the Beatles did little more than provide the vocals to previously written and recorded tracks for the album. In effect, the Beatles' operation wasn't that much different than the Monkees. The Beatles and crew were a Tavistock-based entity tasked with pushing a social engineering agenda.

[@michaelwills1926]

@@cjs750Mike’s breakdown is impressive. It’s like he says, if you know anything about recording tracks and producing a record the timeline doesn’t add up. The whole thing is predicated on people being complacent and easily satisfied with simple answers. The Cinderella story.

[@bajorekjon]

Maybe all of his vocals for those albums were recorded before 1967. Or maybe they had the technology to replicate his voice in the studio. It would explain why they never toured their last 5 albums. And maybe by the time they broke up, the Paul replacement was extremely good at impersonating his voice. I'm not sure if I believe it, just throwing things out there.

[@michaelohare3157]

Goggle pops knows nothing they used to take copious amounts of uppers in Hamburg to stay awake an keep playing! Also.. it was harrisons dentist that gave the acid 😒

[@juanmanuelcastro6431]

I want you to pay close attention. In 1964 a colossal level of fame and fortune was finally achieved. In 1966 John had no better idea than to say that "the Beatles were more popular than Jesus" and other worse phrases. This caused many people to burn their records and others to stop buying them. In addition, it caused them to no longer be able to perform concerts, not only because they would receive attacks but also because they could stop selling tickets. They knew that the big business of selling records and concerts was over. They had to implement a marketing strategy to attract attention: change the look, dress up, do everything possible to attract attention (that was Sgt. Pepper), load the mystery discs (Mystery Tour implies a desire for mystery and a tour that they wanted to do and couldn't) and phrases backwards... The effect of this gradually began to wear off as well... and they had to appeal to "someone unidentified" to call a radio station in the United States -a station with national coverage (it is not coincidence that happened in the USA where John Lennon said stupid things) - to say that Paul had died (a serious radio does not allow an anonymous message to air unless it agrees with the strategy of attracting attention again... but they needed someone to say it because people didn't understand the hidden messages). This reignited the sale... But only for a time. Then they broke up... This caused sales again... but only for a while. When we see John in a white robe and with beards and long hair like Jesus, it is very evident that all these changes and tests were to heal the wound caused by Lennon's words and recover the attention of the public and the business. Paul, George and Ringo also with beards and long hair like Jesus. It was a kind of apology... It was like saying "we are not against Jesus and we want to be bought back". This call for attention also did not last long. Then John Lennon pretended to criticize Paul with songs and Paul pretended to criticize John with songs... (John himself acknowledged in an interview that he had a good relationship). Mystery strategies continue to work to this day. Remember that these were not the ideas of John and Paul but of a large multi-million dollar company. If Paul McCartney died in 1966, how come he continued with the same talent, the same powerful and versatile voice and even better compositions? This is simple: mystery movies sell more than love movies. MARKETING STRATEGY same as the false testimony recorded by a Harrison impersonator. Don't compare Paul's height to his girlfriend without heels and him in heels or comparing Paul's height to John having Paul in heels or the mirror pictures where the left ear is actually the right. And don't start with the stupidity that the CIA or the queen killed Lennon. Find out for yourselves how he treated Yoko and where the shots that hit her body came from (Chapman fired but didn't kill anyone). Find out who was with Yoko at the Dakota's apartment the day after the crime. If the queen wanted to kill him because he was going to expose a plan, she would have done it sooner and if the CIA had wanted to kill him because they believed he was a communist, they would have done it much sooner. And remember: Chapman hasn't found out yet that he didn't kill John Lennon. Ask Yoko that she knows the truth. She knows who José Perdomo is and why the freight elevator was open. But she also knows the truth of everything she suffered. Paul will still not answer and play the actor every time he is asked if he is a double and he will laugh... But he is certainly the same man as before 1966. kzbin.infoFgZlfiED2U4?feature=share3

[@beatlebrian4404]

I have just seen your post, a very long post! But full of innocracies, for a kick off, the Beatles gave up touring and concerts, because they were absolutely, burnt out, after 3 years constantly on the road! Nothing whatsoever to do with Lennons "bigger than Jesus" quote, ther 1966 USA Tour, after lennons quote was their most successful to date in terms of money earned! the other point I disagree with is, the Beatles were a manufactured band, with music, written for them! The only help the Beatles had was from Brian Epstein and the fantastic George Martin the rest was Talent and sheer hard work! But I do agree with you on thr fact McCartney never died or was replaced in 1966!

[@juanmanuelcastro6431]

@@beatlebrian4404 That is to say, you think that wearing uniforms is not a marketing strategy to win back the conservatives?... Do you think that leaving a long beard and long hair like Renaissance art indicates that it was Jesus is just a coincidence and it is not a way to apologize to the believers?... Do you think that the colors of psychedelia and the cartoon movie were not to win over the children?... Do you think that the supposed fights in the form of songs between Paul and John were not were they a strategy to sell?... Do you think that Tom who called the US radio was not a strategy to attract attention?... Do you think that inventing mysterious characters like Sgt. Pepper, Maxwell, Rita, etc.) was a coincidence and it was not to generate mystery?... I do not rule out that everyone has written what they thought and what they felt; I don't rule out that they were tired of giving recitals... But just around the time Lennon spoke about Christianity, in the country that gave them fame (USA) they began to lose contracts and not sell as many records... Think about it.

[@juanmanuelcastro6431]

@ARE3A3B-yj6jl You're wrong, my friend.

[@beatlebrian4404]

@ARE3A3B-yj6jl I like your homour! Unfortunately it will completely go over the head of most.

[@bajorekjon]

Who was with Yoko at the Dakota the day after the assasination?

[@Kieop]

Show us your shirt!

[@tbeau6663]

Crap, guys....... you weren't there. Or even born. Lennon and Harrison both experienced LSD on the same night, late in 1965. It was two to three years before McCartney repoprtedly tried acid. Lennon was the most experimental, guys. McCartney was an opportunist who jumped on everyone's bandwagon.

[@serious323]

They were heavy into Crowley and that's disturbing enough. The Beatles really honestly were not that great. They were pretty much a boy band and got too much credit for mostly lame lazy written songs.

[@JD43232]

yes but no not the government. and you have to ask yourself...who is the government?

[@anneannabu5130]

Heres something that seems a little sketchy to me also..and its so simple people look right past it... WHY doesnt anyone compare DNA????????? This whole circus could be cleared up once and for all and either Paul would never have to hear another word about it or he'd be exposed and would have to explain the whole thing. His DNA has alteady proven to not match the claims of the woman from his Hamburg days..which could mean either she lied which personally i dont buy since she wouldnt have waited 60 years to say something..OR maybe Paul doesnt want DNA testing?? WHY hasnt the simplest thing that could answer that in a day been done? I think everyone interested should pressure him to be tested.

[@Kieop]

She didn't wait 60 years. She waited 2 years. She waited until Beatlemania broke to come forward. Despite the fact that it is MORE than plausible that any of the Beatles might have fathered children in Hamburg, her story and the math just never added up. Paul wasn't in Hamburg when she conceived, nor when she found out she pregnant (according to her own timeline). He WAS in Hamburg a week after she gave birth, so why didn't she approach him THEN? Why wait until he was famous? Also she claimed they were in a relationship that no one else remembers, especially his other Hamburg girlfriends. I could believe a one-off, but a long term relationship? There is photo of them together, so we know that they did at least meet. Even so, Brian Epstein had a policy of paying off all claims no questions asked. When her daughter turned 18 and the money ran out, she sued to get her daughter officially recognized and that's why the paternity tests weren't done until the 80s. She was lying the whole time, until she probably convinced herself it was true.

[@18gabbanelliplayer]

Do your research, George did use some drugs too look it up he mentioned it in an interview where he was in the middle no heavy drugs but still doing psychedelics.. man I want to do a podcast now it amazes me how I come for info here and everything is just off. George recorded a song with John called where do you sleep at night and he looks so uncomfortable recording it cause they were threatened by the mi6 if they kept on giving clues they would die, look it up that’s where John is saying a lot about Paul and sadly he was shot when his biggest song yet was Imagine just think about that and let it sink in…

[@taramilton8695]

Absolute b.s J.Lennon has been on 'record' numerous times admitting to his daily L.S.D consumption during 67...

[@christiansamaroo]

That’s definitely a lie because it cannot be used daily.

[@Mredits-m2012mkkboy]

Y’all talking about the conspiracy but all I’m thinking of is the boomers music taste personally I like 2 of the bands listed and I gen z

[@IndepIndepWALT]

Ok but they did what they could to push back, all you need is love, give peace a chance, and I'll put a rare one, notice how leenons really political songs like Attica state, and luck of the Irish aren't big, I've followed the beatles my whole life, i don't think they were "Created" by the government, they were MANIPULATED by capitalism. Remember we hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal that we are endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights such as life liberty and the pursuit of happiness, that to secure those rights governments are instituted among men deriving their just powers FROM THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNORD THAT WHENEVER ANY FORM OF GOVERNMENT BECOMES DESTRUTIVE TO THESE ENDS IT IS THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO ALTER OR TO ABOLISH IT. AND TO INSTITUTE NEW GOVERNMENT LAYING IT'S FOUNDATION ON SUCH PRINCIPLES AND ORGANIZING ITS POWER'S IN SUCH FORM AS TO THEM SHALL MOST LIKELY AFFECT THEIR SAFETY AND HAPPINESS. I hearby consent to the government of NeuTopia.

[@kevinmyerscough8670]

Your leg shaking bugs me

[@libbytown]

This HOST is completely in the dark about MANY facts. These are ones the Beatles themselves wrote about.. How rediculous to even hold this discussion.

[@0flan]

That guys foot is bugging me. Sorry .

[@beffjuckley]

Fta

[@wesleycook7687]

Lies, Lies. I can't believe a word you say.... Knickerbockers, 1965. This is Billy Shears? Wow, he looks Nothing Like Paul. !!!

[@mateusshoeman2092]

You are brilliant in your bedroom

[@gilvieira4110]

God, the ignorance!!!

[@johnyarusso4953]

I've never heard so much misinformation about The Beatles in my life. Do your homework guys, it's all out there.

[@Henrik2020]

That's the problem. None of them do their homework. They regurgitate what someone wrote or said somewhere. They're simply lacking the skill of critical thinking, which I hope will be taught better to future generations.

[@justiceforjamespaulmccartney]

James Paul McCartney died in car crash on September 11 1966 and was replaced by William (Billy). This is THE TRUTH no matter what.

[@MrThedonhead]

This is also unfair with people with mental health health issues that dont realise you are taking the piss! Some poor people really believe

[@johnedwinoliver6842]

Not Accurate

[@JaySuschrist]

Dude is so wrong, but so sure of himself. lol.

[@alanoneill3065]

bullshitters they were on speed and the rest in Hamburg

[@DCfromBC]

John did acid every day for over 2 years. It IS documented, quite extensively.

[@bajorekjon]

I don't know if he did it that much, or he would have become an acid casualty like Syd Barret. I believe he did it a lot, but maybe not every day for years.

[@DCfromBC]

@bajorekjon it's in the Love You Make by Peter Brown and in John's best friend Pete Shotton's book. He took an ENORMOUS amount of acid. Syd's problem was how much he took at once, coupled with a predisposition to schizophrenia.

[@bajorekjon]

@@DCfromBC That's interesting I'll have to check ot out. I would just assume he took a couple days off a week to reset his tolerance.

[@DCfromBC]

@bajorekjon quite possibly. Books are full of hyperbole. In any case, he did tons, and a lot of great music came from it.

[@bajorekjon]

@danielchase3390 His best music in my opinion. There's a fine line between acid creating great music (Lennon, Hendrix) or acid destroying someone's ability to create (Syd Barret, Peter Green)

[@bellodrade]

If Billy Shepperd was that talented, why wasn’t he in the Beatles? And why not, with all that talent, strike out on his own and keep his name and identity? Think about this: this November will mark 57 years of impersonating a music icon without any discovery- except, of course for the astute and diligent among us who cradle the truth dear and near to our faithful hearts. It boggles the mind! And something else that is nagging at me- if the CIA, MI6, or 5, the Queen's guard, the illuminati, or whatever, were responsible for this, why were they allowed to break up? You would think that once under control, they'd be going harder than the Stones by this time. I don’t get it. Paul or Faul. Whoever is calling himself McCartney nowadays did an almost impossible job of recreating the natural progtession of a one in a million talent. Why couldn’t they do this with Elvis, or Hendrix, or even Jim Morrison? Why do they get to die when their time came? Was McCartney's entire family replaced? These are hard questions, my friends... hard questions.

[@johnjohn37371]

I'm sincerely praying that the bourbon bottle was passed around and emptied prior to this conversation...

[@MrThedonhead]

I know otherwise they are the thickest people in the world and people with mental health issues believe it

[@johnjohn37371]

@ARE3A3B-yj6jl I'm not 100% sure what to do with this information...

[@elpolitemexa2272]

>Affirms the Beatles where not druggies and there is no evidence >Believes Paul McCartney died >"Paul McCartney was the more innovative of the Beatles" His ass not cooking

[@scotsman6712]

"Boomers and their godawful taste in music" haha. You don't know much.

[@Menyhard]

In a car crash

[@juliewilt9732]

More likely, murder.

[@michaelwills1926]

@@juliewilt9732ritual style

[@bellodrade]

It was the Lizard people who control the Illuminati. But Paul isn't dead. He's been time travelling with the alien who is actually the goofy, bearded knucklehead's father... but which one? Hmmph....

[@jlutie2943]

Why are middle aged men still talking about the same old story that everyone has heard a million times

[@davidbrown8763]

Stupid comment.

[@keithaguirre4927]

Wow whatever you got to tell yourselves...Paul is dead and who cares.

[@mace9930]

What? The whole band was replaced by alien androids in 1965!!! After smoking pot with Bob Dylan for the first time, the Beatles took a Yellow Submarine (called lovely Rita) into the Marianas Trench. Paul did it to honor his Mother, and the other Beatles wholeheartedly agreed without any reservations. The Yellow Submarine sank, and the Beatles died in an Octopus's garden. They were immediately replaced by alien robots from the Constellation Cygnus X-1 (which Neil Peart of the band Rush later wrote about). Obviously, the FBI was not involved. After playing concerts until December of 1966, the alien robots brought LSD into the world. "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" was about the robot's former life on another planet, and "A Day in the Life" was about how well the androids were coping with human lifestyles. Only someone that was an alien robot could eat as much LSD as "John Lennon" could, that is self evident. The robot Beatles had lots of free love, and conceived 15 robot babies, which were quickly whisked away to Area 51 for experimentation. Robot Lennon returned to the alien planet after faking his own death in 1980. He was contacted by an alien ship in NYC shortly beforehand and told them "I want to go with you". They agreed to take him. Moreover, he wanted to leave Yoko, who had become suspicious because his detachable toes had a habit of sleepwalking. Robot Lennon was adeptly repaired by an alien engineer named "Dr. Roberto X3000". When John was gone, Robot Paul remarked, "He was a Dragon" (referring to John's status as a Dragon according to Chinese Astrology). No one knew what this cryptic line meant. After George Harrison robot faked his death in 2001 and returned to planet India Omega, Robot Paul was replaced by yet another robot clone, whose name was "Earworm" in 2008. The Android Beatles reunited on Pluto in 1979, for an interplanetary concert for the galactic federation of multidimensional beta sloths. Because money means little to an Android, they only charged $3..... Android Ringo decided to remain a part of mankind until the human race went extinct, deciding to neither "die" nor leave. Faithful Ringo will thus always be with us. Paul the Android quipped in 1998, after his wife died, "Maybe I'm amazed". The world over was appalled by his lack of sensitivity, calling him "inhuman". An actual robotic red alert siren went off in Paul's head, when he thought he had been discovered somehow, and he quickly changed the topic. These are all facts, and can be verified if you listen closely to Beatle songs in reverse or read reputable Beatles publications.

[@constantine7382]

I buy it! Makes a Hell of a lot more sense than this brain dead guy.

[@younggrinch2826]

Goddamn I hate when people act like their conspiracy theories are definite truths. Like dude there’s no actual proof relax

[@mikeclinton5069]

Even if Paul died who gives a flying crap

[@davidbrown8763]

Such a stupid comment. Obviously many people care, or there would not be so many conversations on the subject.

[@samdeninno1951]

Because if some miracle he did die and was re[placed they could do it to anybody

[@bustercherry8734]

John halliday is the original paul. Never died in 66.

[@johnnyharperscoutstable5386]

I like billy better🐸🍺🔪🔥

[@wagyubeefstyle]

The Paul is dead rumors are HILARIOUS but what the theorists dont realize that if thats true "Billy" was a better musician AND singer than Paul ever was 😂

[@StarcasterBand]

I call bullshit.